Charlie Rose interviews Lawrence Schiller about his book American Tragedy and the O.J. Simpson Trial. (October 17, 1996)
Пікірлер: 235
@mikepersich31487 ай бұрын
Nicole predicted her own fate in writing and verbally topped off with ," He will get away with it". That's powerful.
@pjpredhomme76994 ай бұрын
She had good reason to believe that he would get away it. When he finally was supposed to have been arrested Jan 1, 1989 for domestic assault - there had been 8 previous police visits - and there had never been any consequences for him.
@lbca813 жыл бұрын
Per Carl Douglas, they did the redecoration and he said if OJ would have been hispanic he would have put up sombereros
@suejuede525 Жыл бұрын
I find it hard to believe OJ found that repugnant. He didn't find it repugnant to beat the crap out of Nicole all those times
@riverdean7 Жыл бұрын
huh was only 1 time
@pjpredhomme76994 ай бұрын
part of the danger of a narcissistic sociopath - he had a way of compartmentalizing it - "he made her do it" if you listen carefully to him -they argued - -all couples argue - Nicole had a "terrible temper" When he hit her car with the baseball bat - she said you are going to pay for that - he said I pay for everything - so he decided to go all out on it - it is all consistent with the narcissistic sociopath that he clearly is/was
@blueberrycobbler3 ай бұрын
@@riverdean7Not according to her diary.
@riverdean73 ай бұрын
@@blueberrycobbler she never had a diary
@janes68942 ай бұрын
@@riverdean7 yes she did. Her sister Denise talks about her and her dad reading her notes and diaries kzfaq.info/get/bejne/nteWncuQyrmnoXk.html
@beckyrivera86004 жыл бұрын
It really bugs me when Rose pronounces Kardashian's name "Kadassian."
@antoniothompson24863 жыл бұрын
The interview with Johnny Cochran I realized it
@SethMacLeod952 жыл бұрын
The name wasn’t that popular back then.
@riverebec1 Жыл бұрын
@@SethMacLeod95 True.
@twinktoiletsbestfriendsmomscan Жыл бұрын
Lol, to each their own. I personally love it and find it hilarious. That family needs to be belittled in any way possible, even if it is something as benign as mispronouncing their name.
@annechris2677 Жыл бұрын
That's fine. Robert Kardashian would be ashamed to see his kids turn to porn
@truesonic669 Жыл бұрын
i have never been hooked such a case. then the oj trial. there still unanswered questions.
@Augfordpdoggie2 ай бұрын
no oj did it
@riverebec14 жыл бұрын
No, the best book on this subject was Outrage by Vincent Bugliosi, followed by Murder in Brentwood by Mark Fuhrman. And Simpson is not an atypical murderer who has submerged his crimes into his subconscious. He's a narcissistic sociopath who not only knows he murdered Nicole Brown and Ron Goldman, but believes he was justified in doing so. He spent years trashing Nicole even after he murdered her. He probably still does.
@beckyrivera86004 жыл бұрын
@@camoyscommercialcleaning8115 YOU STFU! Unlike you, I can cite actual evidence proving Simpson's guilt.
@bigdaddycool42423 жыл бұрын
Actually, the best book on this is “Evidence Dismissed” by Dan Moldea.
@kingdomofanimaria3 жыл бұрын
@@bigdaddycool4242 what’s Lange theory on what happened that night based on the gate
@bigdaddycool42423 жыл бұрын
@@kingdomofanimaria Read the book.
@kingdomofanimaria3 жыл бұрын
@@bigdaddycool4242 don’t have time unfortunately
@Dequehablo3 жыл бұрын
Great interview. Looking forward to reading the book
@blueberrycobbler3 ай бұрын
What he found repugnant was that he no longer, in the years proceeding the murder trial, had the total adulation of the public that he enjoyed for so many years prior to 1994. I also don’t think that he found the act of murder against Nicole as repugnant on any level because he probably justified it and blamed her for pushing him to the breaking point.
@asmasultana8775 Жыл бұрын
Blood samples can be planted somehow, but a timeline can not be created. So O J did not or could not do it!
@abdulmah722 жыл бұрын
Charlie is in denial himself considering that he got fired for his own inappropriate behavior. But great job by the writer for only giving the facts and leaving his personal opinion out of it. That's excellent journalism.
@jeremywatts81343 жыл бұрын
This guy is a master manipulator.
@harrylime38952 ай бұрын
Why did OJ fail the polygraph if he believed the crime didn’t exist in his mind?
@josephswabe55842 жыл бұрын
The criminalist (Andrea Mazolla) put her initials on the blood swatches collected from the crime scene. When the swatches got to CellMark to identify who's DNA it was, none had initials on them. Vanatter booked only 6.5ccs of the 8ccs OJ gave to the LAPD on the 3th of June. Gary Segler of the coroners office testified in the civil trial Vanatter demanded and received the blood of the victims on the 15th of June. Collin Yamauchi testified in the criminal trial that he may have accidentally put OJ's blood on the Rockingham glove while propping the vial that spilled holding OJ's blood. Officer Kelly Muldorfer testified in the criminal trial that she was in the Bronco on the 16th of June and there was no blood in it. The blood on the back gate didn't appear until July 3rd. The blood on the socks didn't appear until August 16th. Fuhrman was pointing at one glove a whole hour before he goes to Rockingham to find the other glove. He doesn't point at any blood footprints, car keys, envelopes, a bloody beeper or the knit cap. What made the glove so special. A lot people don't even know that a light blue police evidence bag was found on OJ's neighbors property. Less than 5 feet away on the other side of the fence. Cochran submitted into evidence in February of 95. The diary used in the civil trial has since been debunked because Nicole supposedly was writing about events that would not occur for another 3 days based government records. The picture with OJ supposed wearing the Bruno Maglis was supposedly taken on Septempber 26th, 1993. Bills vs Dolphins. The game is on youtube. All the sportscasters are talking about is how it has been raining all weekend. When you look at the picture, it is sunny. The original pathologist that performed the autopsy stated that Ron was killed by two different types of knives. One single edged and double edged. The courts refuse to release the phone records of the victims. How can the murders occur at 10:15pm. If Ron is going to a club to party with friends that night and he leaves work at 9:55pm, how is he at Nicole's at 10:15. He goes home. 5 minutes He takes a shower 10 - 15 minutes Gets dressed 2 minutes Eats a salad 3 minutes. Go to Bundy 2 minutes I'm quite sure he called Nicole to tell her he was on his way. Goldman was at work for 7 hours. He didn't rush to leave and you expect me to believe when he got home he started doing a lot of running around.
@ellenlyons4090 Жыл бұрын
Read Body of Evidence that will give you the correct time lines and what was used In the civil case that wax the used in the first trial .
@josephswabe5584 Жыл бұрын
@@ellenlyons4090 Who is it by?
@ellenlyons4090 Жыл бұрын
@@josephswabe5584 Tom Lange and Phillip Vannater it’s on Amazon if you have a kindle. It’s an honest account from their point of view. They don’t sugar coat any mistakes made what they give is the reasons why they were made.
@josephswabe5584 Жыл бұрын
@@ellenlyons4090 Your talking about Evidence Dismissed. They agree with the Defenses time line which means OJ could not have done it.
@ellenlyons4090 Жыл бұрын
@@josephswabe5584 it was the prosecutor Marcia Clark who decided to go with the time line. Even though Lange and Vannatter told her it was wrong. They had a guy walking his dog who heard a guy shouting hey hey hey. Going on the guys time frame they think this was Ron Goldman coming across Nicole being attacked. And then taking in to account the woman car driver that saw OJ nearly taking her out and screaming at another driver who got in his way at a junction. And the time she gave and the the Limo driver who was waiting to pick him up and saw him walking from behind the bungalows across to the main house and the time he saw him. They told Marcia Clarke the murder was later than the time she said it was.
@atlantarhythmsection20174 ай бұрын
Toobin was so far off in his analysis of OJ’s importance to his own defense that it makes me wonder what Toobin was doing during the trial. I think we found out years later. lol
@dulaelba95894 ай бұрын
For many years I believed everything I heard on the news on this topic. I thought Toobin was trustworthy but I’ve since learned (studying the entire case) Toobin is a greedy lying piece of shit. The entire media made obscene profits off OJ and that is why I believe they refuse to even consider the possibility of another killer. I believed every word the media told but not anymore!
@soulovelee_24332 жыл бұрын
What was their excuse for Ron Goldman's blood being in his Bronco?
@proudlysouthafrican4368 Жыл бұрын
Was planted there...It had EDTA in it...Something that the body does not produce on it's own...And the Blood was only found there 3 weeks after the murder
@ellenlyons4090 Жыл бұрын
It was all three of their blood in OJ bronco . Unless Ron and Nicole hitched a ride in the Bronco explain how it got there it had to have been transferred. As they were lying dead in the front yard they didn’t leave it in the Bronco.
@milart12 Жыл бұрын
@@proudlysouthafrican4368 Not true, of course.
@user-ci7bf3gg2q3 ай бұрын
Ron and Nicole’s blood was in the Bronco bc Ron and Nicole’s blood was on OJ. When OJ got back into the Bronco, that’s how it got there
@truesonic669 Жыл бұрын
charlies does amazing interviews. to bad he is gone now.
@SIKE014 жыл бұрын
the best book on the trial of the century along with OUTRAGE by VINCENT BUGLIOSI.
@SUNMAYDEN5184 жыл бұрын
he did it period
@bigdaddycool42423 жыл бұрын
@ Yes
@hotboy80baby183 жыл бұрын
@@bigdaddycool4242 no he didn't
@bigdaddycool42423 жыл бұрын
@@hotboy80baby18 and what leads you to believe he didn’t?
@bigdaddycool42423 жыл бұрын
@@hotboy80baby18 was it his blood at the murder scene, or the victim’s blood at his house? Just curious 🧐 Kind of hard to explain the blood of someone you’ve never met, in your vehicle, and on your property.
@hotboy80baby183 жыл бұрын
@@bigdaddycool4242 because I have common sense and I've really watched and disected the whole trial, they got caught trying to frame oj and Johnnie cochran proved it at the end of the day....
@truesonic669 Жыл бұрын
Going to buy his book
@theloaner43783 жыл бұрын
countless books were written, but Schillers book is far and away the best. Toobins was the second.
@josephswabe55842 жыл бұрын
Did their books mention these facts: The criminalist (Andrea Mazolla) put her initials on the blood swatches collected from the crime scene. When the swatches got to CellMark to identify who's DNA it was, none had initials on them. Vanatter booked only 6.5ccs of the 8ccs OJ gave to the LAPD on the 3th of June. Gary Segler of the coroners office testified in the civil trial Vanatter demanded and received the blood of the victims on the 15th of June. Collin Yamauchi testified in the criminal trial that he may have accidentally put OJ's blood on the Rockingham glove while propping the vial that spilled holding OJ's blood. Officer Kelly Muldorfer testified in the criminal trial that she was in the Bronco on the 16th of June and there was no blood in it. The blood on the back gate didn't appear until July 3rd. The blood on the socks didn't appear until August 16th. Fuhrman was pointing at one glove a whole hour before he goes to Rockingham to find the other glove. He doesn't point at any blood footprints, car keys, envelopes, a bloody beeper or the knit cap. What made the glove so special. A lot people don't even know that a light blue police evidence bag was found on OJ's neighbors property. Less than 5 feet away on the other side of the fence. Cochran submitted into evidence in February of 95. The diary used in the civil trial has since been debunked because Nicole supposedly was writing about events that would not occur for another 3 days based government records. The picture with OJ supposed wearing the Bruno Maglis was supposedly taken on Septempber 26th, 1993. Bills vs Dolphins. The game is on youtube. All the sportscasters are talking about is how it has been raining all weekend. When you look at the picture, it is sunny. The original pathologist that performed the autopsy stated that Ron was killed by two different types of knives. One single edged and double edged. The courts refuse to release the phone records of the victims. How can the murders occur at 10:15pm. If Ron is going to a club to party with friends that night and he leaves work at 9:55pm, how is he at Nicole's at 10:15. He goes home. 5 minutes He takes a shower 10 - 15 minutes Gets dressed 2 minutes Eats a salad 3 minutes. Go to Bundy 2 minutes I'm quite sure he called Nicole to tell her he was on his way. Goldman was at work for 7 hours. He didn't rush to leave and you expect me to believe when he got home he started doing a lot of running around.
@twinktoiletsbestfriendsmomscan Жыл бұрын
How do you feel about Bugliosi's book?
@theloaner4378 Жыл бұрын
@@twinktoiletsbestfriendsmomscan Damn good I would rate it third.
@twinktoiletsbestfriendsmomscan Жыл бұрын
*27:16** "OJ doesn't know in his own mind that he did this crime." I really thought this guy was smart and interesting until I got to this part.*
@riverebec1 Жыл бұрын
Agreed! I read this book when it came out and don't remember a lot of specifics, but I do recall thinking it was filled with a fair amount of speculation and conjecture.
@twinktoiletsbestfriendsmomscan Жыл бұрын
@@riverebec1 sounds consistent with this interview. Of all the books written about OJ, may I ask if you have any recommendations?
@riverebec1 Жыл бұрын
@@twinktoiletsbestfriendsmomscan Outrage by Vincent Bugliosi (on how he would have prosecuted the criminal trial) followed by Daniel Petrocelli's book Triumph of Justice (on he did prosecute and win the civil trial - the cross-examination of OJ Simpson alone is worth the read) were both favorites of mine. Murder in Brentwood by Mark Fuhrman is a good read. The books by Marcia Clark and Chris Darden aren't bad...once you get past the sour grapes. His Name is Ron by the Goldmans is a heartbreaker. Those are my picks. Thanks for asking.
@twinktoiletsbestfriendsmomscan Жыл бұрын
@@riverebec1 Wow. Amazing. Great minds think alike. The Bugliosi book is actually at the top of my list. Thank you so much for sharing, my friend.
@riverebec1 Жыл бұрын
@@twinktoiletsbestfriendsmomscan Thanks again for asking.
@JinChohan9 ай бұрын
19:30 the 2 witnesses walked past at 10.25 not 10.35-40
@truesonic669 Жыл бұрын
27 tapes. there is no time to edit 27 tapes.
@m420373 жыл бұрын
Last year? Uhh that was 25 years ago lol
@andycummings-music2 жыл бұрын
27
@SethMacLeod9510 ай бұрын
28
@dreams13193 ай бұрын
Spouse abuse doesn’t lead to murder ?? Is he nuts
@kennethwalls3412 ай бұрын
Bc that's not always the case 🤦🏽♂️🤦🏽♂️
@lynndragoman15733 жыл бұрын
Anything to make some money schiller.
@TaborTalk3 жыл бұрын
What an honest guy - you have to take your hat off 4 that
@bekreto2 ай бұрын
Stop LYING. The blood evidence did Not sait he did it.
@ikediamond7 жыл бұрын
Charlie Rose slants negative and condescending... Schiller asserts Norman Rockwell painting and Rose barks "poster or whatever". Cornball ass
@gloriawashingon14526 жыл бұрын
Ike Diamond yes I watched the trial. And I did DNA analysis at J&J and readcTHE DOUBLE HELIX....SCHECK OR SHYSTER BAmboozled them...even the two ignorant motors said they PSID the evidence no mind and based the decision on Furhman
@SirDiamondRod6 жыл бұрын
Too many oddities that fail to add up to convict OJ
@kennethcharles1386 Жыл бұрын
This was first person who made ant sense at all about the OJ Simpson trial. Now I've got to get the book.
@josephswabe5584 Жыл бұрын
He is doing a lot of lying in this video.
@acefromspace2727 Жыл бұрын
Excellent book
@bekreto2 ай бұрын
READ " LEGACY DECEPTION " and " KILLING TIME ".
@drewlavay2 ай бұрын
Legacy of deception is chilling.
@palerider9649 ай бұрын
I don't care what anyone says. The bastar* did it.
@ronrendina89869 ай бұрын
Nicholas shreck
@Augfordpdoggie2 ай бұрын
ridiculous he was a wife abuser, he was not a good person he did it
@deoglemnaco70252 жыл бұрын
I wrote a book myself!
@riverebec1 Жыл бұрын
Seriously, I mean about this case? Was it pro or plant?
@deoglemnaco7025 Жыл бұрын
@@riverebec1 huh?
@riverebec1 Жыл бұрын
@@deoglemnaco7025 Was your take pro guilt or pro planting of evidence? Or were you just making fun of the hundreds of people who wrote a book about this case, in which case I wrote a book too! A comic book.
@deoglemnaco7025 Жыл бұрын
@@riverebec1 what was your comic
@riverebec1 Жыл бұрын
@@deoglemnaco7025 Was just kidding that if I had ever written about this trial, it would have had to be a comic book. Over-the-top, cartoonish, and full of fantasy.
@ronrendina89869 ай бұрын
Why does shiller have all the insides of from jfk to charles manson ..oj i dont believe shiller government stooge
@suejuede525 Жыл бұрын
I can't believe this guy. I don't want any of his books....
@kingdomofanimaria2 жыл бұрын
24:51
@twinktoiletsbestfriendsmomscan Жыл бұрын
Are you referencing the terrible edit?
@kingdomofanimaria Жыл бұрын
@@twinktoiletsbestfriendsmomscan Na just the statement tbh I agree with him OJ valued his public image more than anything and here it was over and he was going jail he wanted to kill himself he even said he hated how they were talking about him on the media and news in the build up to the bronco chase and it pushed him over the edge along with the medicine he was taking ps the editing is terrible
@johnnyhawkins433 жыл бұрын
Well at least he was acquitted and justice was done!
@Avinadav123 ай бұрын
Are these people Stupid? The blood had EDTA in it meaning it came out of a Blood tube not Simpson body on the Night of the Murders.