Very useful prompt

Can you explain? I didn't quite understand

Hello von Thailand, I'm not sure that I understand what makes good promote. Please help with some examples thx 😢

Thanks for the kind words Steve! As always, it was a great pleasure to talk to you. Keep rocking 🚀and shining 🌞

What’s the voice plug in?

@@cobracommander8133 It's a Chrome plug in - Voice Control for ChatGPT.

Me too

How much time do you think it would take for the voice support to come?

​@@abhinavchauhan7864 ChatGPT isn't multimodal for the public yet, but this young man figured out how to do it using plug-ins. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/fJ2moLJ8vdGmYIk.html

Fantastic comment! Also the study of languages can help people connect with their own ancestry. Especially for Americans. Learning Norwegian has been surprisingly soulful. I loved learning the other languages I speak, but Norwegian has been uniquely wonderful. Despite not growing up there or with the language I can't help but feel the language is apart of my soul in some way. It's like a discovery of the Scandinavian part of my soul or something. 🇧🇻💪

This is the humanistic case for studying language that’s too often forgotten. It’s depressing that a lot of people just see language learning as some skill to put on their CV.

None, pure anthrophic phycobable. Here is why: You're correct! Dogs have an incredible sense of smell that allows them to identify individual dogs down to the cellular level. They achieve this through several fascinating mechanisms: Superpowered Olfactory System: More Scent Receptors: Compared to humans, dogs have about 220 million olfactory receptors in their noses, compared to our measly 5 million. This vast repertoire allows them to detect and differentiate a wider range of scents, including subtle variations unique to each dog. Vomeronasal Organ: This specialized organ, located near the roof of the mouth, processes pheromones, chemical signals that convey information about an individual's health, reproductive status, and even emotional state. Acute Sense of Smell: Dogs can not only detect faint odors but also track and analyze them incredibly precisely. Imagine reading a complex novel just by inhaling the paper! Filtering Out Undesired Scents: While sniffing another dog's rear end provides valuable information, fecal matter isn't part of the intended message. Here's how dogs manage to isolate the relevant scents: Selective Attention: Just like we can focus on a specific conversation in a noisy room, dogs can prioritize specific components of an odor mixture. Their brains focus on the pheromones and other chemical signals embedded within the overall scent, effectively tuning out the fecal component. Odor Localization: Dogs can pinpoint the source of different odors within a complex scent mixture. By sniffing strategically, they can focus on the anal glands and other scent-producing areas, excluding the surrounding fur and fecal matter. Prior Experience: Over time, dogs learn to associate specific scents with specific meanings. They recognize that the fecal component isn't relevant to understanding another dog's identity or mood, allowing them to filter it out subconsciously. So, yes, while smelling another dog's rear end seems strange, it's a crucial social interaction for dogs. Their amazing sense of smell, combined with their ability to filter out irrelevant information, allows them to gather a wealth of information about their canine companions, laying the foundation for social interactions and communication Ok. All life forms communicate. But lives communicate in different ways. Wolves and Dogs communicate the same way but they do different socially. Wolves are peridomestic dogs are domestic. Humans communicate as dogs and wolves do. But we do not have enough ofactory glands to tell one individual from another. We have to do that in a different way. The uniqueness of each human voice stems from a complex interplay of anatomical factors and learned behaviors. Here's a breakdown of the key contributors: Vocal anatomy: The size, shape, and elasticity of your vocal cords, along with the dimensions of your vocal tract (including your mouth, nose, and throat cavities), influence the fundamental pitch and resonance of your voice. These anatomical features are unique to each individual. Learned behaviors: The way you use your voice, including your speaking habits, pitch variations, and emotional inflections, is shaped by your cultural background, social interactions, and personal experiences. This adds another layer of individuality to your voice. Together, these elements create a vocal signature so distinct that even identical twins can be identified by their voices alone. The uniqueness of human faces is a result of a complex interplay between genetics and environmental factors. Here's a breakdown of the key contributors: Genetics: Our genes determine the basic blueprint of our facial features, including bone structure, muscle placement, and skin tone. However, genes don't provide a fixed recipe; they allow for variations, making each individual's combination unique. Environmental factors: From the womb to adulthood, various environmental factors like prenatal conditions, diet, and even posture can subtly influence facial development, adding to the individuality we see. Random chance: During embryonic development, even minor random variations in cell division can contribute to facial uniqueness. The combined effect of these factors creates a vast number of possible facial configurations, making it highly unlikely for any two individuals to have exactly the same face. It's an intriguing thought experiment to consider how humans would fare without the ability to distinguish each other visually. While facial recognition plays a significant role in social interactions and identity formation, it's not the only factor that shapes our relationships and communities. Here are some potential challenges and adaptations if humans couldn't tell each other apart: Challenges: Social recognition: Recognizing individuals and forming relationships would be significantly more difficult. We rely on facial cues for nonverbal communication and emotional expression. Personal identity: Our sense of self is partly shaped by how others perceive us. Without visual differentiation, self-identity and expression could be impacted. Social organization: Daily activities and social structures might require major adaptations. Adaptations: Heightened reliance on other senses: Hearing, touch, and smell could become more important for recognizing and interacting with others. Increased use of symbolic markers: Clothing, hairstyles, and other visual markers could take on greater significance for individual and group identification. Shift in social dynamics: Communication and social interactions might emphasize shared experiences, values, and interests rather than individual appearances. Ultimately, whether humans could "do well" without visual recognition is subjective and depends on how well we adapt to the challenges and develop alternative means of social connection and identification. Therefore languages emerge because we all sound and look different because we cannot tell each other one from another as, E.G. dogs do. Even if everyone sounded identical, communication would face challenges: Speaker identification: Recognizing who's speaking in group conversations or when voices overlap would be difficult. Emotional nuance: Tone and pitch convey emotions. Without them, understanding intent and sarcasm would be trickier. Nonverbal cues: Visual expressions and gestures complement speech. Their absence could lead to misunderstandings. Social cohesion: Shared accents and dialects foster group identity. Uniformity might weaken group bonds. Personal expression: Vocal variety allows individuality. Monotony could hinder self-expression and creativity. Despite these hurdles, humans would likely adapt through: Emphasis on words: Precise language and enunciation would gain importance. Alternative cues: Touch, smell, and posture might take on new significance in communication. Symbolic communication: Clothing, hairstyles, and mannerisms could become identity markers. Ultimately, communication would evolve, but human connection and expression would likely face challenges in a world without vocal variety. We may not choose language, custom, habits, traditional, and more they maybe what we have to use given what we are. Humans possess an innate capacity for language acquisition, but the specific languages we use are learned through social interaction and cultural experiences. While Chomsky's theory of universal grammar proposes innate linguistic principles, it's a complex concept with various interpretations and ongoing debate.

Ok. chatGPT and Google Gemini you say the said one must use the personal pronoun every time one uses a conjugated form of a verb. Ok. That is not correct. However AI has to make an assumption. In French and English the pronoun must accompany the conjugated verb. So if French, English, and German are the languages the major developers of chatGPT use like the human that started it it will make a similar assumption. That is a good thing! That tells us that chatGPT and Google Gemini are living, breathing systems that not only teach but also learn. When chatGPT and Google Gemini say something that is not correct I tell them via examples. The outcome has always been thank you. I did not originally understand that. Those systems have to learn from us. It is not a one way street. I asked Google Gemini to correct what I wrote above. This was the response: "You're right that it's not always necessary to use a personal pronoun with every conjugated verb. While languages like French and English often require them, others like Spanish or Italian can omit them in certain contexts. It's true that language models like ChatGPT and I are constantly learning and evolving, and your feedback helps us improve our understanding. Keep providing examples and corrections, as it helps us become more accurate and informative.' Back in the old days Google Translator asked you, me, and others who it knew were reliable language users to join with the application. Many times we had to write in the best translation. Most people could not write in the best translation. I would watch people using Google Translator in conversations and laugh. The people in the conversation would ask "what is so funny?" Unlike what some think Google Gemini and ChatGPT work best when the user knows the language the AI is speaking. AI is like talking to a Russian. One gets the most out of it when one can hear, listen and speak Russian. But there is no human being that can match AI. It is smarter, knows more, learns faster, does not have an agenda. Right now there is nothing that a human being can teach that it cannot teach better. It cannot teach you how to hit a baseball yet but in less than six months there will be muscle tissued cybernetic beings that will be the best baseball players in the history of the game. We will have a cybernetic baseball league. That will mean that there will be no human professional baseball players. Just as there will be no more human language teachers. And

I have a better idea I think- why not find article on topic in TL, read it engage etc. Then knowing tha t is correct put it into GPT and ask it to generate questions for you? I'm gonna try it- so thanks for your initial statement!

One cannot tell that one is not talking to a real person. AI means that one does not have to go to a country to speak a language. I have a friend's list on Whatsapp App. I used to have to talk to them. Once they got tired that was the end of the conversation. AI does not get tired. It does not get mad when you ask a question. It does not yell into the phone "I do not know what a God damn past participle is and I do not care to know. Do you understand me or not? If not I am hanging up the phone."

100% agree. I can clearly see that he isn't a native English speaker, but his level in English to quote Christophe Clugston is phenomenal.

That's an excellent way to start, now branch out with the same enthusiasm.

Interesting, can you elaborate on how did you use whisper for learning? Thanks

.

@@BacNguyen-hg9vt I use it to generate subtitles for videos/podcasts. I struggle the most with listening comprehension but this helps.

I don't know if that make a difference, but back in the day, people when learning a second language had fewer resources than now and that I think played a big role into their capacity of remembering things and stuff. Internet is a nice revolution but sometimes people just get lazy because they think that Internet will solve all their problems and when learning a language the rate of attention into it can vary depending of how addicted to internet you are. But I'm not saying this is bad cause it changed the world in a good way but it has drawbacks.

Imagine an infinitely patient teacher accessible twenty four seven, with a totally complete vocab and flawless grammar, that knows every slang, that can emulate every type of accent...that's where this is heading, this will be the end of language teachers

Quazel is an interesting tool. I just downloaded the app. I don’t see why the teachers in this video haven’t recognized the value of chat ai. It’s like having a language partner at your disposal who has infinite patience and will talk about anything you want in your target language.

I asked it for example sentences in French, and it made so many obvious mistakes. I asked "why" and it produced made up language rules to justify its mistakes. Scary. Wondering whether later versions will be better. At its current state, I have a hard time trusting any of its output.

@@Ph34rNoB33r yeah. It’s a large language model program, but the problem I think most of its training input was English. I’ve had the same issues, I tell native speakers the sentences and they definitely tell me there’s awkward phrasing sometimes.

That is really cool so it created the material for you?

@@jsweebles2150 yeah.. ChatGPT itself is sometimes very good at this, but you kinda need to already know what you're doing or you'll end up with crap.

InnerFrench