music is too loud..

@@TjSi most the time, he wont put a track on it

@@I_K_I_K math problems be like. Cranston careful he got us manga liner Against All American and probably can see the mother for cheaper at the wrong with this and would be nice about it because he said that he can do what he couldn't take his garage lights Home Market snake-man the red who threw him take a camera. Calculate the mass of the sun.

@@Malaysian.Dajjal funny joke lol

@@TjSi go hear some kpop music while watching compression video What a dumb

Ikr

*Should just post the results of the time. Straight to the point in 1 second. No one even sits there watching the countdown. I just skip to the results of each video game so what's the point of the countdown timer.*

@@AzNightmare We watch the full countdown in order to understand better the full screen time experience. Imagine someone telling you about the movie Avengers:Endgame that-they go back in time, steal the stone, thanos manage to come back, all fight each other and iron man save all by sacrificing. Simple and easy no need to watch the full movie, everything straight to the point. Is that what you desire in life? Loser

@@boombam_bob121 *Your logic doesn't even make sense. One is a movie that is constantly feeding the mind fresh information, the other is equivalent to watching paint dry. You literally staring at a clock. Only a loser would do that:* ˡᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᶻᵉʳᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒ⁰⁰⁰⁰ᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒʰᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒ⁰⁰⁰⁰⁰⁰⁰⁰⁰⁰⁰ᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒ⁰⁰⁰⁰⁰ᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒʰᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᶻᵉʳᵒ⁰⁰⁰⁰⁰⁰⁰⁰ᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒ⁰ᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒ⁰⁰⁰⁰⁰ᵒᵒᵒᶻᵉʳᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒˢᵉʳ *What is simple, is finding the results, knowing which one is faster... No need to stare at a clock like a* ˡᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒʰᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᶻᵉʳᵒ⁰⁰⁰⁰⁰⁰⁰⁰ᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒ⁰ᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᶻᵉʳᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒᵒˢᵉʳ

@@AzNightmare I'm not stating the fact that one is a movie and the other is just a timer. I know the differences. I'm not comparing them, i explain the LOGIC of "everything straight to the point"...if you have the brain to decipher it. Loser Now, let's see your logic 1.the movie is not just information its entertainment and art 2.of course noone want to watch a paint till it dried up it pointless and uninformative. But the video is brief and informative. Btw you cannot compare a video about how fast/slow ssds are with watching a paint dry (according to you say-logic). If you don't like the style of the video so much then why click it in the first place. I click on the video cause it less than 3mins and very informative, i experience the full effect plus the results. You can see the thumbnail you know which ones better then you should go f**k yourself. Instead you're just b***hing around like an a**hole. You know that your the biggest LOSER of all for wasting your PRECIOUS 3mins TIME. loooooooooser

So true

Thanks now i know

@Badr Ahmed get a ssd. Windows will boot in 15-20 seconds

@Badr Ahmed i put a pny 120gb ssd into my 10 year old pc. Booted up pretty quick.

​@Badr Ahmed For me around 15 sec with my M.2 intel 660p nvme

exactly.

How long do they last tho?

The Kingston A400 doesnt have DRAM cache tho. It is fine for loading games, but under heavy workload, it can be disastrous (there is a case that it was slower than the HDD). Also, DRAMless SSD can wears the NAND Flash Memory even quicker. You can check things about DRAM-less SSD online. Thats the reason why i bought a slightly more expensive 860 EVO (mainly due to higher TBW than A400 by a lot (about 140TB difference), and having a DRAM cache for heavy workloads as main drive and its not wearing out quickly). Also, you dont need 860 PRO for everyday usage, the EVO variant is good enough for it, you can also look at other SSD thats cheaper and has DRAM cache included 😁

@@Keikoatr72 thank you for this information! Is there anything else I should consider before buying a 1Tb ssd for my new gaming+3D rendering pc build?

@@ozlevin1678 for 1TB... You better look for TLC ones (they tends to have more reliability, its a bit more expensive. MLC is even better than TLC, but again more expensive). QLC is nice for daily usage but for heavy workloads where you write a lot of datas, QLC tends to wears out quicker. Thats why QLC is cheaper and also shorter warranty. QLC examples whould be the Samsung QVO variants. DRAM cache is also needed for good performance + durability of the NAND Flash chips. If you wanted a really, really durable one (you are doing 3D rendering after all). Go for Samsung PRO variant (highest TBW that i know for now and MLC which is durable than TLC). Second choice would 860EVO (1TB has 600TBW which should be sufficient) or Crucial MX500 (if you can find a brand new one, its kinda rare here in my country so the price is kinda higher than 860 EVO and it comes with no warranty). But again, its up to you (since you know how much you can spend). People spend more a bit on the durability of the SSD, not just the speed of it... so do some research and look at the TBW and the reviews of it. (Also at the DRAM cache, make sure yours has one)

Everybody here is talking about the negligible difference in speed, but what you pay the premium price for is durability and reliability. The SSD from Samsung has a 5 year warranty compared to 3 years on Kingston, will sustain its fast speeds during longer workload (for example moving a 20GB game from one directory to another), and won't slow down when nearly filled. Maybe I wouldn't go for the 960 Pro in 2019 (nobody should), but 960 Evo and MX500 are slightly more expensive than this Kingston, and a lot lot better. I wouldn't cheap out on it.

Stupid delete the image

@@Piko5552 in your opinion, which program is easier to use: crucial or Samsung? I look for reliability and beginner friendly program for cloning when choosing SSD. Granted this is my first time building a PC lmao

​@@WitchYuki22 IMO best just to get a 500GB Samsung 970 Evo Plus for boot and the games you play the most, then get a decent 2TB HDD for everything else (very cheap nowadays so better value for bulk storage where you don't NEED fast speed). 500GB is enough wiggle room to be useful for most everyday things, and you won't be paying a fortune for it. This is what I just built my own computer with, and it works perfectly for what I need. 970 Evo Plus is one of the best SSDs available atm, at least in terms of benchmarks and reliability. As for programs, I've not really had much experience with other brands so can't say. Samsung software is decent enough though.

I bought kingston 240 gb cheapest model 32 buck on sale..and i am glad i bought this.. its amazing and if you compare with expensive one difference is not even visible at all in overall performance..go for cheaper..

you can't even read the hints

Lame😂😂😂

Buy faster phone😂

Im using M2 SSD which is way faster than SATA SSD and I literally have to wait 10 seconds after loading until I get connected to the internet. Literally connecting to the internet is my bottleneck now

LMAO

Same Lmao

TRUE. 😂🤣 I bought a WD Blue 3tb at the same price of a 480gb SSD.

Yesss

@@ricwilliam9839 Or you could buy a small SSD for the OS and main programs + a 2TB HDD and have your OS run faster than a dying gasoline truck

@@Siberianwolf232 I actually own a WD Blue SN550 512gb for OS

@BreakFast_Mach10 I don't even know what you're talking about

@BreakFast_Mach10 What's that?

Ssds have a dram or dynamic random access memory cache so that stuff can be retrieved faster. This is helpful because ssds can only be written to a finite number of times and possibly puts less pressure on the ssd itself to retrieve stuff

the samsung ssd is also bigger

martin0499 because they chose a bigger drive

Humans can only see HDD

But i need to download more storage and also turn my hdd into ram ...

lololoji How do I turn my computer case into 4 RTX 69420s?

???

Thanks for likes :)

Why

@@firefoxclub you don't get the joke.

@@Bryle_ try playing rust and say that 3 seconds dont count

@@ozy5332 i know right . rust is the best game and every second count

@@iamrahulmaurya no lol. Loading maps could take more than an hour if you don't have a SSD (Rust)

You also pay more for the brand, and lifespan

Jay lay I think you’ve missed the joke

@@therealshimo I think he don't care about the joke

@@ThePepe969 well yes. But actually no.

What joke? Lol

its like 3 second diffrence

@@evan4096 Yes, I don't see much difference either, I have two 480gb Kingston A400 rn, but in 1 year I'll still buy an expensive fast reliable m2 for several terabytes and be fully confident that I have a good PC build

You can get crucial mx 500 for the same price which is almost as good as 860 Evo. Plus double the dram cache compared to a400.

@@siphoningblues2975 Ya true i have both Crucial MX500 500 gb and Kingston A400 240GB and Crucial i use it for games bcs its much faster then that Kingston A400 . Kingstom A400 i use it for windows .

The intel 1tb 660p m.2 goes on sale on newegg for 95 from time to time great drive

Defy Convention I actually just upgraded my 256gb 850 pro for the 660p 512gb (for $52) and for some reasons my load times feel slower. I never measured them, but in some games it will take ages compared to my other drive lol.

One thing I'll say is that the Samsung has advantages too . (Cache storage and way longer life span)

Buy cheap SSD, you'll need to buy it twice

@@MuhammadRafy why?

@@mustang_7553 maybe he means that 2 cheap SSDs are better than one expensive

Cheap SSDs don't last long Samsung SSDs are costlier because they are the most durable ones

Crucial SSDs provide good performance for their price but they can't match Samsung in terms of life span , stability,etc.

aint that a good thing?

Well its a good SSD after all

@@Ilias_Geo it’s not good compare to samsung. for games yes, but for work not really. even tho i hate samsung and probably buy cheap ssd just for games

Well atleast u have a ssd I dont even have ssd port😕😕 :' Crying in corner!

@@zeitsuishere2609 you don't have a sata port?

tbh i still think SSD would be faster on day2day but there are certain places where the HDD is right next to the SSD for instance in seq writes. WD Black 12TB vs Kingston A400 128GB

obviously a cheap SSD is faster than an expensive HHD

HDD*

The fastest hdd in the world (seagate exos) is 480mb/s. Even the crappiest ssds have speeds exceeding 500mb/s

Fast wise SSD wins (obviously) storage wise HDD WINS u can get a 1TB for less that $60

It's mainly for professionals, not gamers.

@@10ReasonsWhy professional what?

For professional cloud is the only answer for safety but if you want extreme performance the go for expensive.and if you want play games go for cheaper with extra storage cus games can take lot of space

professional LUL

*Sips tea in preparation of SSD breaking and or running out if space*

Yep, they should consider that. I bet that kingston ssd will die way before samsung does.

The way SSDs are made (closed system with its own OS), both of them can die or endure for the same amount of time. Dram cache is only useful when writing large files at full speed - which, in case of a drive for games, mostly does not happen. Most users use either internet (Gbit LAN can handle up to 125MB/s speed) or HDD (5400rpm - 150MB/s, 7200rpm HDD up to 200MB/s), which is way below SLC cache speed. Well, except QLC drives, since QLC is extremely slow, with maximum writing speed of 80MB/s after exhausting SLC cache. Also don´t forget, that many currently sold SSD´s don´t have dram cache - AFAIK, only Samsung and Crucial use it and only in selected models. Everyone else uses only SLC cache. Durability means nothing when it´s all only electronics. It can die within first hour of use (yes, even the most expensive Samsung can do that) or endure years of service with zero issues. Just like every other consumer grade electronics.

And speed but not in games.

SSD Durability is the same...

@@Morpheus-pt3wq yep but Samsung SSD’s are more reliable.

Loading time is not the only thing to be taken into consideration

i often lay down a bit to help my back while my game is loading so hard drive it is, who know maybe i will even fall asleep !

extra time sounds cool but extra 120+dollars for a little extra time isn’t worth it imo

@@fieldsofbozos insta bloody_impact_xt , snap BloodyFang28882

The Aussie Gamer yeah, like I’ve got a nice wd black m.2 boot drive, but honestly a lot of my games are still on a hard drive and I don’t notice loading times being too long, so I’ll probably just go for cheaper ssds for additional storage.

Cheap ssds suck tho. Don't look at load times only. Your Samsung will last a lot more longer and it will keep its performance high even when its full. Meanwhile cheap ssds are slow asf when they are full. Plus they don't last as long.

@@joesmith1810 Western Digital is the worst

@@youtubeshadowbannedme what about crucial or samsung evo? Both 500gb

@@youtubeshadowbannedme my wd still alive after a decade 🤷‍♂️

Its not just liading times. The samsung will last double longer than the kingston

@@Daniel-ru8je The disk will become obsolete sooner. According to my calculations, if you record 30 GB of data per day, then the disk will last for 7 or more years.

@@Daniel-ru8je still it's more than twice the expensive 🙄

Same it just 3 or 4 sec fast 🤩

@@Daniel-ru8je if that go for a Kingston a2000 nvme or crucial bx500 quite a bit cheaper than Samsung and will last similar

Thanks man

Thanks \(^.^)/

Thanks

Thanks

Thanks you are amazing

I have Crucial MX500 500gb and its so fast + stable. Paid only 60$.

Eh, maybe. The cheaper brands tend to die after 6-12 months. Not always, but still very often. Just look at the comments and ratings for Samsung vs cheaper brand ssd's on Newegg. Samsung ones last years in almost every case and on average only cost about 30% more than Kingston. If you average out the Kingston lifespan between people who got good ones and those who got the shaft, Samsung still comes out on top for dollar per gb value.

@@robertlefeaux Agreed but just like u said ... it depends on how you treat ur pc & ssd I have a Samsung m.2 and adata su sata Both are awesome

@@Eddie16 That's not what I said at all. When the cheaper drives break it's usually due to manufacturers defect and the consumer has no control over it.

@@robertlefeaux "IF it breaks" Dad has one from 2015 and it's still good .. so if you are building a mid-range rig you won't buy the expensive especially that the differences between them are as little as Cool Cat's mind ...

Hola

@@croxdechuek58 hi

AMD!

@@ricaeldocarmo5005 XD

Money win

No! The A400 will be as slow as a crappy HDD, just after a couple of weeks using it! Don't buy it!

@@Lemure_Noah wrong.

ClayJitsu i’ve used 3 cheap ones(sandisk, klevv, kingston) and they all died within 2 months. swapped them out for a samsung snd have been going strong ever since

ive had 3 OCZ SSD's fail, im on 2 sammys now, 128gb 840 pro for OS and programs, and a 250gb 850 evo for games

Im thinking on doing the same exact thing here

Im building a new pc and am probably going to go with a 500GB WD Blue M.2 NVMe, and 2TB Seagate Barracuda, those 2 combined is only $110 which is good for the price

Your profile pic is legendary and I still play the game

Wut Dude, CS 1.6 is the shit

Does raid actually make games load faster? Is it hard to set up?

Darzo raid doesn’t make load times faster and is fairly easy to set up.

@@kryskarr23 it's not worth it, you just need one drive to fail and everything die. And a ssd is basically a raid 0 of NAND chips, so it's just not as good as it would be on a HDD..

*say

which probably doesn't have a dram cache

Well the Kingston also doesn't have a dram cache.

@@smashishere A400 is also DRAm-less That's why this video makes sense.

Andika Suryadarma Your wallet can too

So "may I ask which SSD is and best for a gamer that has a third generation console (PS3/ XBOX 360) ? ANYONE PLEASE SHARE

thank u so much lol

Thanks a lot man.. I was really searching for this comment

Dude, you are amzing! Thank you!!!

Yeah, durability and stability are why expensive SSDs are expensive, not just speed 😂

Exactly

THANK GOD SOMEONE SAID IT. Seriously guys, always check the guarantees (both TB written and the duration) on the SSDs you're planning to buy.

I dont think so.

Not to mention the Kingston also doesn't have a dram cache.

You sure about that? What about open world games with very little loading screens? Maybe not necessarily fps but it will at the very least get rid of shader cache stutters playing on those kind of games that load as you play it.

@@wpninja83 I think it's just what I said, the game gets more fluid with sdd, because all the scenarios and textures are loaded faster with ssd, nowadays hd is obsolete, it just does not use ssd, who still does not know its benefits, ssd is the best purchase for a computer

Scenery and textures come from your video memory on your graphics card. Even an NVMe drive isn’t fast enough to load textures from without a noticeable stutter.

@@TheVillainOfTheYear It is not that way, everything is allocated in ssd, the faster the ssd the better the loading of the games, the gpu has the function of running and rendering the frames of the game that was loaded by ssd, faster ram memory and ssd brings much benefits in games

DJ DaniBoy Eqp Mega Stars when you load up a game, the textures and assets are loaded into system memory and video memory. When you’re in an open world game and you are walking, you’re not loading every few feet of texture from system storage. It’s simply not that fast. That’s why you have 4-11 GB of frame buffer on your graphics card.

its all about reading spead. the mx500 is clearly NOT way faster

Way way faster than A400? :D in loading times? In data copy? In scratching?

The 860 PRO is only really desirable for frequent sustained writes (such as found in cloning or video storage) and its *extremely long* lifespan. A much better "cheap vs. expensive" comparison would be comparing the Samsung 970 EVO Plus to the Kingston A400, since NVMe SSDs like the 970 EVO Plus are far faster in every category than SATA SSDs. Another good comparison would be comparing the Samsung 860 EVO to the Kingston A400, since they're closer together in price range and the 860 EVO is just as good as the PRO for gaming and general use.

@@MegaDominik1 You have no idea of what you're talking about or haven't done your research then because if you go to UserBenchmark you'll see that the Crucial MX500 500GB gets an average of 477MB/s for sequential reads while the Kingston A400 480GB gets 332MB/s which IS a large difference of 35%. The 2nd biggest factor for loading games is 4K reads at high queue depths and there the Crucial MX500 obliterates the A400, averaging 351MB/s vs 212MB/s. That makes the MX500 65% faster in that aspect. Overall the MX500 will be about 50% faster at loading games so yes, WAY faster.

@@amehu Yes, you can go to UserBenchmark for results. The MX500 is anywhere from 35% to 80% faster for only a couple bucks more plus you get an additional 20GB of space and a 5 year warranty vs 3 years.

As well as money ;)

@@rambo7890 dude time is money

I have an old Kingston V300 drive, 240 GB. The write performance is almost as good as read, around 500MB/sec (as expected.)

AMERICUNT DREAM!

Why would you loase data on a Cheap SSD ?

Ever heard of backing-up? You should be backing up your stuff weekly...regardless of what drive you have.

@@rubaiyatmehedi9337 In Germany you can buy Intenso ssds. They are cheap and often made of chips from unknown sources. People rated them not that well in terms of durability...

@@BlueSparkzVideos i'm always backing up important data, but a failure would still cost me a lot of time. In Germany the cheapest terabyte ssd is like 95 Euros and s Samsung 860 Evo is 130. I'm willing to pay 50% more for more speed and durability...

Also (not to brag, but...) in a 2000 Euro computer i think 30 Euros more for the "best" ssd of its class is justifyable.

That's what I thought! If it's gonna be alot cheaper than we have to look about the other factors and I just thought about that if it keeps up with a samsung than it'll probably die quicker... Goodjob for bringing this up.

Yeah so you're gonna spend triple the price on something that as far as I'm concerned may very well just be a possibility? That's absolutely ridiculous. Every comment section has to have an idiot like you tho.

@@hugopereira5640 all SSDs have a maximum read/write capacity and usually more expensive ones have a higher capacity. I didn't say that you shouldn't buy the cheap ones I was just pointing out another factor. No need to be mean about it

The A400 doesnt have a long lifespan as the Samsung 860 Pro.

I have had a Kingston in my laptop for the last 5 years, no problems.

CloudKingXII lol, assumption because it’s cheaper? BS

@@bigostream5979 no, i own a A400 myself and done multiple heavy writing on it for a year and last month it officially died on me. This vid just so happen to come by as i was searching for a new ssd.

@@CloudKXII I uderstand you, and sorry to 'attack' you. But, I've to say, I have 3, A400's my self. And I do heavy writing and reading too. But mine are after 2 years still fine and running good. So I thought you made an asumption. But, they really shouldn't die that fast in my opinion. Don't you have any warranty, still?

Будешь должен

спасибо в карман не положишь

@@asderr77 ,ты прав мы ещё не додумались тереться членами друг с другом, мы живём традиционными методами!

@@asderr77 , твой язык попы наши как облизывал так и будет облизывать, судьба ваша такая смиритесь! Без России вы никто!

@@percentworld5593 Piece of shit im still not retarded enough to undertand you

I also have a cheap Kingston SSD, it's an old SSDNow! V300 240GB SATA drive I bought sometime back in the dark ages of home computing (early 2015.) I've used and abused my Kingston drive like a 10-dollar whore, and it still shows up as having 98% life remaining and no spare blocks used.

there is no a400 pcs you idiot

@@asderr77.... i dare say he was sayin watching on his pc that has a a400 in it, especially with the space before pc!

@@TENNSUMITSUMA There is no difference in watching videos with or without an SSD dare I say. Its nothing remarkable and shows his life is meaningless due to that cancerous emoji

HellFire yes there is

For gaming, there is no point, for work and stuff like that, maybe.

The point is the durability The evo has double TB endurance, and also a dram cache unlike the kinston

I've got an one too! ;)

I've two 480gb

Yeah but the human eye can only see 10mb/s read write!!

@@LukusMaxamus Well I can't see the difference between 2mb/s and 10

but it s good for loading why every one speak about his eyes

@@Frank_Pods tbh u can find 1tb HDD with 30 dollars

Depending on what you use your storage device for, for example SSDs are really useful for speed runners when they're practicing a game level and they need to reload the game often SSDs help out in that situation a lot

Watch tech deals video u will understand that endurance doesnt matter for normal case use

Panther God yes it does, don't save $100 when the hassle will cost you more than that in the future. Word of advice: never buy QLC garbage

I want my stuff to last years!

@Fitrah Mulia A R Commskill18 I'm not saying other ssds won't last. I'm saying Samsung is better than the competition. Don't kid yourself. There is a reason why Samsung sell ssds for twice price and still sell more than the competition. I recently bought a ex950 over the evo plus. Not Samsung fanboy, they are just better.

@@propeldragon Your point does not make sense. Even cheap throw-away SSD's can easily do 5+ years of heavy abusive usage. After 5 or 7 years, even if the SSD is still working fine, you WILL have moved on to more modern storage mediums in that time. So stop kidding yourself with that "there is a reason Samsung sells for twice the price" nonsense. Samsung ssd's are expensive because they are meant for high profile data centers, content creators, etc. If you are just a gamer or professional installing an ssd for your own personal computer, getting the Samsung would be just idiotic.

I used to have an ASUS laptop with a 2 cores n2840 celeron, 2gb of ram, 64mb of integrated graphics and a 5400rpm seagate hard drive, can you point out what is the bottleneck of this extremely low spec machine, it’s so slow that’s it’s incredible

kumar venice there isnt a gigabyte ssd

@@zphantox have u googled before commenting

@@kumarvenice310 dont u mean tb??? He is right

@@ChewMunchy www.google.com/search?source=hp&ei=Cdv1XNqtGKPez7sPvuWyyAo&q=gigabyte+ssd+240gb&oq=gigabyte+ssd&gs_l=mobile-gws-wiz-hp.1.1.0l8.1492.6366..8600...0.0..0.269.1649.0j9j1......0....1.......8..41j0i131j46j46i131i275j46i275.sXTyp0C6Olc

You already know the 970 is gonna smoke the 860 out of the sky

That's nvme vs sata are you high??

@@NaoVII Ikr thats like comparing Lightning McQueen to a Bugatti. Ofcourse Lightning McQueen is far faster.

Sata ssds are cheaper and very likely the wiser choice, but to compare the 970 Evo Plus or 970 Pro vs 860pro is not to see who would win, but for how much, how much gain in loading times does an nvme gives you over a the best sata ssd.

970 evo and pro SMOKE the 860pro

Bruh its not only loading times The samsung will last like double than the kingston

Ssd is ssd price don't mean much

It really depends on the game and the amount of data your cpu/gpu can handle vs how fast the medium reads it. A faster SSD only really helps with a game that heavily streams data with a system that can process the data that is read by the SSD at an equal or greater pace.

@@MLWJ1993 Well said

I was expecting that too, because of the prize gap

@@oulhadjouldsaadi9978 objectively wrong.

Right, i dont understand people saying the kingston is bettere or the ones who insult samsung ssd owners

Yeah but some people do not understand this. I had SanDisk Plus and it gave up in 6 months due to downloading and copying big files...got replacement and sold it immediately. Bought 860 Evo and after 2 years its still going strong. Performance is like day and night. So much better than cheap TLC ssds. On the good side i get +2 more years of warranty (5 years total)

@@amixreckless6118 I also have the 860 evo