No way he s 20... He looks 30 years old.

do you know the beard product he's using

No way bro.. I’m 20 and that man could be my father

​@@Alberto-cx3hjBecause he's black? Some of you are just too funny.

He's 20

Chelsea default settings 😂

I like dt guy as he is a vry good player bt his look is like dos dangerous Mexican drug lord😂

35 year old 😂😂😂😂😂

….45 😂😂

You mean 35 😂

@@stephanusadjeimarfo743 no I meant 55 😅😅

it won't even send shivers down the spines of championship players

@@Espeo 🤣🤣🤣🤣

Really nice shot

yes rather then getting a good player to start with .🤣

@@osmanfadil2451you can’t be guaranteed that you buy a player and they will be good for your team! So yes low risk is better in some situations

​@osmanfadil2451 what makes you think calafiori will be good in the prem you don't know that it's just a prediction atp trust the process I prefer signing smart alternatives that are less money than signing the main guy bc less pressure to perform and actually given the room and experience to develop

So?

I was talking about the profile the whole video. And I’ve been speaking about getting a left sided gusto. That doesn’t have to cost 50m so I dunno why you’re confused

@@matissearmani youve not seen him before and you think hes good for your club. Common man. I thought you were the one with a brain in the social media industry

David Datro or Wesley?

Sell disasi,Keep Chalobah, loan ugochokwu, Sell Sterling , we’re keeping Sanchez , Sell Chilwell, Keep carney and sell the rest

Lol Gallagher too

Fofana is the future of Chelsea bro

Badiashille

minoxidil

Can’t see him wanting to leave city to come to us. I’d rather we got a Costa from Porto who has something to prove

@@matissearmani fair enough

They obviously liked him and would’ve wanted him. But I think it was very obvious a deal couldn’t be done from early on. Like I said before, no space

@@matissearmani I hear you bro but we're one Cucurella injury away from a catastrophe. This Veiga is not very promising at all from what I've seen. (not judging by comps)

😂😂😂

These chelsea fans omg 💀

He might need to in a game. Just because it might not be plan A doesn’t mean it will never be needed

Lateness is greatness 😂😂

Far from this guy is a monster

All of them probably

interesting 😂😂

They will challenge but not this season. They are building a model similar to city. When Chelsea were doing well in the 2000s and 2010s city took elements from Chelsea and made a system that brought them the success they enjoy today. Chelsea is doing the same thing as our fortunes have reversed 😂

Chelsea are in a rebuilding phase that's focused on the medium to long term by signing a lot of young talented players. If you look at players like gusto who was a success last season and more recently signings like estevao and paez that will be coming in 2025 they have the ability to become world class players in 3-4 years while being in their early twenties. Those that don't end up breaking through can still be sold to recoup or even profit from the money spent on them. A recent example of this would be Omari Hutchinson. On paper this will allow Chelsea to sustainably build a team that would be capable of competing for many years.

​​The difference is City is not buying players like pokemon card​s, 15m here,10m here,20m here.. City never did what Chelsea is doing@@Chelseafan4life_

@@loz501Chelsea’s Top talent WILL BE SOLD FOR PROFIT and prop the next “talent” for sale. That is the medium/long term vision. Owners have stated that WINNING is secondary! The “idea” is to have a constant supply of top talent replacing the talent that was just sold so you making top dollar AND competing at the same time. Interesting concept but it does not seem to cater to retaining the CORE of the team. Feeder clubs “compete” but don’t tend to WIN anything. This is the NEW Chelsea. Don’t paint as negativity .. it’s just a fan accepting the simple reality.

@@djgaryd9147 the problem is it conflicts with the vision that Todd Bohely outlined himself. In order for Chelsea to grow as a brand and for revenues to grow they need to win. That's one of the core objectives he outlined. I do agree with you that they are intending to create a constant supply talent and I personally think they should at some level since footballers can't play forever and it adds a layer of competitiveness. You're likely also to agree with this which is why the key difference in interpretation between us might be the timeline in which the core lasts. From what I gather I'd assume that based on your interpretation Chelsea will likely sell Palmer a top talent in 1-2 years. This means that on average players bought are sold after 2-3 years in order to accommodate for the next batch of talent that comes through. This method definitely destabilises the core of the team which is what we see in the feeder clubs. My interpretation is that the players will most likely be sold in 5-6 years. This allows for continuity needed to win trophies, refreshes the core without destabilising it and allows the club to sell players at a good price. As an example. Someone like gusto in 6 years would be 27 and would go for triple the amount bought for him.

Kellyman was way over priced but this player helps our height issue that we would’ve had with Maatsen defensively so idm this

Maatsen is garbage. He s a midget that costed Dortmund s the UCL final.

that’s not how the accounting works

Chelsea just broke british transfer only last summer. If you expect another 100m every summer then you are delusional.