Chernobyl Episode 4 - The Happiness of All Mankind - Nuclear Engineer Breaks Down/Reacts

  Рет қаралды 207,497

The Atomic Age

The Atomic Age

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 543
@tomh2572
@tomh2572 2 жыл бұрын
21:11 "the baby in utero would be pulling a lot of resources from its mother" - pregnancy described by an engineer
@TheAtomicAgeCM
@TheAtomicAgeCM 2 жыл бұрын
hahahaha
2 жыл бұрын
😂😂😂
@THErealOGse
@THErealOGse Жыл бұрын
As an RN and EMS provider he isn't wrong though LOL. The fetus and the newborn pull a lot of resources from the mother. If Mom is breastfeeding baby is pulling a nice amount of resources from Mom.
@metallusmelandril7380
@metallusmelandril7380 Жыл бұрын
@@THErealOGsewo how many calories is a nice Titt of milk?
@robinpage9362
@robinpage9362 2 жыл бұрын
“The baby absorbed the radiation.” This isn’t true, but it was a commonly held belief at the time, even among nuclear scientists, so it makes sense that she would say that
@panosfasoul699
@panosfasoul699 2 жыл бұрын
Plus the story of the woman is mostly true and taken from her book. Her description of what happened to her husband was actually much harder to read than what depicted :')
@SweetLou0523
@SweetLou0523 2 жыл бұрын
Correct! The director mentioned that in the podcast. Most of the inaccuracies in the show were deliberate because they would have been accurate to the understanding or experience of the people at that time. Craig said there is enough documentaries, he didn't want to make another. He wanted to tell the peoples story as they related it in their books, and as they related if based on their understanding at the time.
@PKAC972
@PKAC972 2 жыл бұрын
Eventually an american doctor who treated Chernobyl victims cleared that them being radioactive themselves was not true. It were the particles on their clothes and skin that were radioactive, but by their hospitalization they have already been washed and their clothes removed. Moreover, an Ukrainian medical responder said that the child showed no signs of radiation exposure: she had congenital heart defects and cirrhosis, which means the child was already sick before the accident; cardiac congenital defects are developed in the first 12 weeks of pregnancy, but the woman was already on the 20-30 week; the chirrhosis instead is a common side effect of cardiac congenital defects, as one of the first organs damaged by a heart defect is the liver.
@p00bix
@p00bix 2 жыл бұрын
Really wish the end of the final episode had clarified that the baby's death was a tragic coincidence rather than a consequence of Lyudmilla's decisions. She's still alive and faced serious harassment from both the media and online audiences after being portrayed on HBO's Chernobyl.
@PKAC972
@PKAC972 2 жыл бұрын
@@p00bix I know. It's the only thing that I don't like of this series. She suffered so much cause the accident. She didn't deserve it again. But also the reporters. How can someone be so cruel? To go to someone and ask her why she exposed her child, while apart from the fact that it isn't true, there's also the fact that she didn't know what her husband was suffering of, as no doctor told her what was really happening.
@berelinde
@berelinde 2 жыл бұрын
Regarding Lyudmila's baby, ionizing radiation damages rapidly dividing cells, regardless of where they are found. The GI tract, the epidermis, and bone marrow suffer profound damage from radiation because these cells are replenished often. ARS patients lose their hair because hair follicles fall into that category, too. But fetal cells divide more rapidly than any of these. That's why they ask women if they are pregnant before taking an X-Ray or performing a CAT scan. A developing fetus is uniquely vulnerable to radiation. Lyudmila's baby did not absorb the radiation instead of her, the baby was just more vulnerable to it. Lyudmila did not increase the risk to her child by spending time with her husband or even by touching him, the damage was done before she ever left Pripyat for Moscow. At the time, she was in her first trimester, the most vulnerable phase of her pregnancy. She is fortunate to have borne a healthy son in the years since, but the odds of it might not have been as remote as original estimates portrayed. A woman is born with all the eggs that she will ever have and they do not begin to develop until they are activated by lutenizing hormones, so the Chernobyl explosion might not have much impact on eggs that were still dormant at the time.
@TestTest12332
@TestTest12332 10 ай бұрын
All that is true. However, during pregnancy stem cells will travel from the fetus and take residence in tissues of the mother, where they in some cases act to repair damage or contribute to immune response. Fetal cells have significant presence let's say in c-section scars contributing to healing effort. Not sure how much or if that helps with radiation sickness, but there IS contribution of the fetus to the processes inside mother's body. I guess there haven't been enough studied cases of radiation sickness in pregnant women to know for sure...
@eTsMONST3RGAMING
@eTsMONST3RGAMING 2 жыл бұрын
Scientist: How can me make measuring radiation dosage as confusing as possible? Other scientists: YES
@TheAtomicAgeCM
@TheAtomicAgeCM 2 жыл бұрын
Blame nature for making it complicated haha.
@lukahutinski9075
@lukahutinski9075 2 жыл бұрын
Its going even on with more common type of radiation we all love and see: lighting. Im used to power ratings. Now led has killed it xD. Lets say im holding a candle for wats.
@andieslandies
@andieslandies 2 жыл бұрын
Ionising radiation is a lot more comprehensible in SI units! Non-ionising radiation (like lighting) is a nightmare of unconvertable units.
@MnemonicHack
@MnemonicHack 2 жыл бұрын
When he says "I did everything right", it sort of reminds me of the main character from Falling Down. In the end, he says "I did everything they told me to." Both of them were lied to and taken advantage of by systems much bigger than them.
@ArsenicApplejuice
@ArsenicApplejuice 2 жыл бұрын
CIVIL ENGINEER REACTS *graphite scene* “Yup, that’s not concrete”
@elluvitesmith9137
@elluvitesmith9137 2 жыл бұрын
guess who won a free trip to the infirmary?
@u.v.s.5583
@u.v.s.5583 Жыл бұрын
@@elluvitesmith9137 Is he delusional? Then you must bring him to infirmary!
@u.v.s.5583
@u.v.s.5583 Жыл бұрын
It is concrete. You know, when oil burns it leaves black stains on concrete. As a result, a block of concrete can look awfully like a chunk of graphite. But we know that graphite is inside the reactor, and the reactor can not explode, so graphite can not get out!
@connor56347
@connor56347 2 жыл бұрын
Can't wait for your thoughts on episode 5 when they really dive into the more technical details of the reactor and explosion!
@xinny4190
@xinny4190 Жыл бұрын
Still love the part when he restates the question Fomin asked earlier to Legasov of "Explain how does an RBMK reactor explode" in conclusion to his testimony
@DmitryArciszewski1
@DmitryArciszewski1 2 жыл бұрын
One small correction: Even when reactor stopped, new atoms of Xenon are still produced from other radioactive elements, so even after 8~9 hours the levels of Xenon would still be high.
@TheAtomicAgeCM
@TheAtomicAgeCM 2 жыл бұрын
Very good point!
@shaun3423
@shaun3423 2 жыл бұрын
If those levels get high enough they actually will preclude starting the reactor back up. We called it a xenon precluded start up.
@platospotatoes6205
@platospotatoes6205 2 жыл бұрын
You'd be waiting a few days before safe restart could commence for Xe considerations. Production is reduced enough with the reactor shutdown to not be a significant factor.
@randomguy-xp7se
@randomguy-xp7se 2 жыл бұрын
Isnt xenon suffocation a problem in thorium reactors as well? I feel i remember kirk sorensen say they had to figure that out in the 40s.
@platospotatoes6205
@platospotatoes6205 2 жыл бұрын
@@randomguy-xp7se xenon is a problem for fission on general: xenon is a fission product, part of a distribution of potential products that does not change significantly between thorium, uranium, and plutonium isotopes (en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ThermalFissionYield.svg), so yes a thorium reactor would have the same general problem, but the particulars would change slightly depending on the neutron energies (for the xenon's neutron capture ability or 'cross section) and flux inside the reactor.
@piotrwoznica9100
@piotrwoznica9100 2 жыл бұрын
There's one extra reason that they may have wanted to classify their RBMK 1000 reactor documents. They were designed to produce electricity, yeah, but they were also used to produce weapons-grade plutonium for the military use. That, plus the incidents at Ignalina and Leningrad involving said reactors, where the SCRAM procedure actually produced a spike in power before shutting down the reactors. Definitely not as safe as they were made to be to the public/west.
@umbraunuivis
@umbraunuivis 2 жыл бұрын
Also I imagine the documents were classified in the 70s/80s in USA too, during the Cold War!
@mckenzie.latham91
@mckenzie.latham91 Жыл бұрын
Nah it was primarily so that no one would question or think the Soviets weren't infallible They literally thought that any hint of weakness in their nuclear system would be a national threat and or would hurt their image as the superior civilization The reason for this is, they censored the potential hazard of the reactor exploding even from the operators of the plant and the nuclear scientists themselves While I can see them censoring that information from the public and international community Keeping it from the actual technicians and scientists was insane Which is why we know it was for national and ideological Pride
@haukesattler446
@haukesattler446 2 жыл бұрын
About the stalled reactor: Xenon is not a direct product of the fission. Iodine135 is. Iodine135 decays into Xenon135 with a half life of about 6.5h. Xenon135 IS the strongest known neutron absorber. Xenon135 can be removed from the reactor ether by burning it by neutron capture, or by waiting till it decays into caesium135. The production of neutrons (neutron flux) and iodine135 is proportional to the current reactor power. Xenon135 burns away proportional to the neutron flux. And now comes the problem: The 'production' of Xenon135 is a not proportional to the current reactor power. It's production rate is a delayed function of the average reactor power several hours ago. So whenever you lower the power of an reactor, you 'inherit' a delayed 'neutron debt' from all the produced Iodine135 'waiting' to decay into the neutron absorber Xenon135.
@dunning-kruger551
@dunning-kruger551 2 жыл бұрын
Exactly. This is how I understood it.
@shadowprince4482
@shadowprince4482 2 жыл бұрын
@@dunning-kruger551 Your name is quite humbling for me. I thought I roughly understood why the disaster happened but I apparently was quite off. I'm pretty sure I'm in the middle of Dunning-Kruger Effect graph right now. 😅
@dunning-kruger551
@dunning-kruger551 2 жыл бұрын
@@shadowprince4482 the more you know, the more you know you don’t know!
@haukesattler446
@haukesattler446 2 жыл бұрын
@Gerald H You are right that Te-135 is the actual main initial fission product. But it's quite short half life of about 19 seconds quickly turns it into I-135. So the actual amount of Te135 in the reactor is negligible. In the end it doesn't matter (for a reactor) whether iodine was produced directly or whether the detour via tellurium was taken. While the correct decay chain is Te135 -> I135 -> Xe135 -> Cs135. The very first transmutation is not really important to explain the Xenon/Iodine pit.
@haukesattler446
@haukesattler446 2 жыл бұрын
@Gerald H Well Iodine or Xenon pit, both make sense. Iodine135 is like a mortgage whose interest (neutron absorption through Xe135) waits to be paid later when you 'maybe' lack the funds (neutron flux) to keep going anymore .
@robinhood5627
@robinhood5627 2 жыл бұрын
21:00 From a biology standpoint, babies and children are growing rapidly, their cells are dividing constantly and generating more human mass to make them grow up. Radiation damages DNA inside cells and so as children are dividing fast that damage materialises much more quickly than in adults who have stopped growing and whose cells divide very slowly. As for a foetus saving the mother, what I think the logical concept here is the mother would not be suffering as much damage from radiation as she's older, the foetus is dividing very very rapidly and so it's cells would be all messed up by the radiation, there was a massive spike in horrific birth defects directly after and as a consequence from chernobyl for exactly this reason. Also check out Chernobyl Heart Syndrome which children born to this day are suffering from. TLDR: the younger you are the more radiation affects you.
@hammyarse8142
@hammyarse8142 Жыл бұрын
I have actually met children that came from people who lived through this whole thing, they used to bring around 40 over to the island I live on in the English channel for a week or two, I met one of the firefighters too, and he was really messed up. Very hard to watch this having met people who were there, as they all had deformities, those poor kids.
@robinhood5627
@robinhood5627 Жыл бұрын
@@hammyarse8142 Indeed it's very heartbreaking. And then we have the fact that there are some 600 nuclear reactors on this planet, while not RBMK designs, they still have massive inventories of fuel and spent fuel just waiting to be released into the environment. Ticking time bombs.
@WTFBODY
@WTFBODY Жыл бұрын
correct. well stated.
@christinanichols5542
@christinanichols5542 Жыл бұрын
Sorry i am so late, but the other and only comment i would add to this is the type of cells in a fetus vs adults account for a lot of this problem. A fetus has many "stem cells" (they all have more specialized names) from which everything else develops. For example, nerve tissue and skin tissue both come from a precursor cell that differentiates and specializes into different tissue. So if that precursor cell is damaged, all cells made after will be damaged. For more of a measurable idea here, a fetus needs to go from 1 cell to a few trillion in ~9 months. So 1 damaged cell = 2 damaged cells after mitosis then 4, then 8, then 16. That is 1 cell after 4 replications that could lead to damage in multiple tissue systems. Now imagine this happens to a full football stadium of cells. Hope that illistrates the difference between mom and baby better. For comparison, the average adult has 50-70 billion total cell divisions per day. A fetus has ~2 trillion total cell divisions per day.
@willerwin3201
@willerwin3201 2 жыл бұрын
The RBMK was designed both to produce power and breed nuclear fuel, either for reactors or weapons. This dual nature may have contributed to the secrecy of some of its specifications, but it’s more likely that the scene is showing the irrational information control that was a daily reality in the Soviet Union, especially as it dealt with the shame of the reactor accident.
@drtidrow
@drtidrow 2 жыл бұрын
My understanding is that the RBMK design was derived from plutonium production reactors, so shared many of the characteristics (some possibly classified) of them.
@budgreen4x4
@budgreen4x4 Жыл бұрын
Would be like trying to look up specs on the reactors at Hannaford at the time
@mckenzie.latham91
@mckenzie.latham91 Жыл бұрын
The KGB and Politburo deemed any kind of hint of a failure or weakness in the soviet nuclear system to be detrimental to the state Essentially they legislated the idea that any notion or reveal that the Soviets weren't infallible was deemed a threat to national security It's literally arrogance and egocentrism "All aspects of the Soviet system are beyond reproach and perfect, and any mention to the contrary is a lie and treason" So they censored anything and anyone who failed to promote "Were perfect always"
@bv1989ro
@bv1989ro 2 жыл бұрын
I believe your explanation of the positive void coefficient is simple enough to be understood yet informative. Kudos to you for the excellent effort and for the series as a whole.
@zerodadutch6285
@zerodadutch6285 2 жыл бұрын
I've been following Chernobyl for about the last decade or so and the New Safe Confinement building (shed looking building) was built for two purposes. First it was created to basically kind of replace the crumbling concrete sarcophagus which had been leaving pretty badly since the 90s. It also has a VERY interesting system in place on the inside that they designed specially to be able to start dismantling both the sarcophagus and to start emptying out the inside of the old reactor building. It basically a supersized crane system. I'd look it up it's actually fascinating how they built it.
@zerodadutch6285
@zerodadutch6285 2 жыл бұрын
One other thing. Alot of the Liquidators that ended up on Katya roof... well most of them have since passed away due to cancer.
@tommyt1971
@tommyt1971 Жыл бұрын
I think Netflix has a documentary about it - it’s an amazing feat of engineering. They built the thing in two parts and slid them into place. Holds the record for the largest human-made object ever moved into place.
@natec599
@natec599 7 ай бұрын
That crane is nothing special. Large production facilities have them all over the world. The place they built it is.
@PhantomV48
@PhantomV48 2 жыл бұрын
How this show didn't hit every horror list that year, and a ton of Top-10+ horror lists since then is beyond me. The way they depict the core is pure cosmic horror. Certainly plenty of body horror. It's apocalyptic horror. It's arguably true crime. For something not technically in the horror genre, it is absolutely terrifying.
@DamienBlade
@DamienBlade Жыл бұрын
I wouldn't say it's cosmic horror, but it does inch towards it with nuclear power. I'm a huge fan of cosmic horror, and while this is horrifying, it seems like this is completely within control if they didn't cut corners.
@samwallaceart288
@samwallaceart288 Жыл бұрын
_The Conjuring_ did nothing for me, it's just a hokey family drama with spoopy home intruders and visiting counselors. _Chernobyl_ made me distrust my own breathing.
@Falcrist
@Falcrist 2 жыл бұрын
The best explanation I've heard of the "positive void coefficient" in the RBMK 1000 reactor was that water *_BOTH_* moderates and absorbs neutrons (if it's not heavy water). In a PWR reactor, water is basically the ONLY moderator (and it's heavy water so it doesn't absorb). If it goes away, the reaction just stops. This seems to be true of boiling water reactors as well. Less moderation but also less absorbtion. The loss of moderation wins, though. In an RBMK 1000 reactor, graphite is the primary moderator. Water absorbs neutrons, so if it goes away, the graphite is still there so reactivity goes up. More reactivity → more heat → more steam → more reactivity → more heat → more steam...
@TheAtomicAgeCM
@TheAtomicAgeCM 2 жыл бұрын
Sounds pretty good. It's actually not heavy water in a PWR or BWR, though. It's light water.
@ricksaburai
@ricksaburai 2 жыл бұрын
Was about to comment this. The effect goes the same for both applications: water both absorbs and moderates neutrons much more readily than steam. That means that wherever water is being employed as a moderator, higher power will generate more steam, lowering moderation, therefore reducing reactivity (negative FL) - likewise, if it's used as a neutron absorbant paired with a moderator (graphite in this case), then more power generates more steam, decreasing absorption, therefore increasing reactivity (positive FL). So RMBKs basically relied on the coolant itself to both cool the core down and limit reactivity along with the control rods (which had their graphite and boron sections surrounded by water). Overall a design very difficult to regulate in unstable configurations (but yeah, cheaper) and power excursions are exponential and drastically fast. Ignalina also experienced an excursion like Chernobyl's, but the core wasn't poisoned, control rods were inserted and safety systems were engaged so they managed to recover automatically.
@Feyqueen91
@Feyqueen91 2 жыл бұрын
@@TheAtomicAgeCM Here's a bit more info on the structure that now houses the Sarcophagus & the reactor that you had been wondering at 13:59. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chernobyl_Nuclear_Power_Plant_sarcophagus Here's another KZfaq Creator that has been doing an in depth examination of Chernobyl as well. The link below covers the containment structure. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/gat_aLlz1Jy2ZKs.html
@daflip7844
@daflip7844 2 жыл бұрын
One of the things I like about this show is how the directors wanted it to be as real as possible. The control room from the beginning was the exactly the same as the Chernobyl control room. What they say in the control room was almost exactly what was said. The speech the general gives to the soldiers before they go on the roof is exactly what he said in real life, and the scene on the roof is shot in real time and we as the viewer are on the roof for exactly 90 seconds with the soldiers.
@grahamsalmons2027
@grahamsalmons2027 2 жыл бұрын
The new cover is called the ‘New Safe Confinement’ and is the largest moving land object ever constructed (apparently). I read somewhere that part of the reason that the Sarcophagus deteriorated so badly was that the concrete and steel was denatured by the intense radiation. I don’t know if this is correct though and would your thoughts (or others) on this. It is very clearly visible from the air! Although I’m well versed in this accident through my own research, I have immensely enjoyed your patient commentary, and consideration of the radiation, doses, exposure using the chart, and learned even more through it. Great series
@swokatsamsiyu3590
@swokatsamsiyu3590 2 жыл бұрын
The rapid deterioration of the old Sarcophagus is twofold. The one you mentioned, the off-the-scale radiation and the second reason is the way they had to build it. Soviet build quality wasn't the best to begin with. Add to that, that the builders had to work under extreme conditions in often very adverse weather. They basically had to throw it together from a distance due to the still absurdly high radiation levels at the time. So, they knew when it was finished that it wouldn't hold forever. The New Safe Confinement is almost like a work of art. Not just because of the sheer size, but also because of all the advanced technology it has to have in order to deal with the dismantling of the old Sarcophagus and the subsequent decommissioning of Reactor No 4. If you're interested, Chernobyl NPP has its own YT channel and they have a lot of interesting videos showing the various tests and rolling out of cleanup equipment.
@grahamsalmons2027
@grahamsalmons2027 2 жыл бұрын
@@swokatsamsiyu3590 I didn’t know that! Will investigate! Thank you!
@jrus690
@jrus690 2 жыл бұрын
Contrary to what was talked about in the video, my understanding is that they are using this new confinement building to begin dismantling the reactor core. It is not going to sit there for all eternity, they are actively trying to clean the place, but of course they have no idea how long it will take, so maybe 100 years is accurate. They have to clean it up, they cannot leave it like that, but I guess the greatest difficulty is figuring out where to put everything.
@erinfreeman4149
@erinfreeman4149 Жыл бұрын
@@jrus690 From a documentary I watched about the new confinement building it has a life of about 100 years and they ae hoping to have dismantled the reactor and the other building by then.
@jrus690
@jrus690 Жыл бұрын
@@erinfreeman4149 I wonder how far along they are with dismantling the reactor. I would not mind daily post about it, even removing a piece of rebar would be good. We have to clean it up eventually, we cannot leave it like that.
@1in6win
@1in6win 2 жыл бұрын
There is actually a really interesting documentary somewhere about the new containment's construction and moving it over the old sarcophagus. It's was designed with an inner crane that is designed to slowly dismantle the old sarcophagus and reactor. Not sure how that project is actually going, but that was the intention of the new containment. Not to simply cover the accident for another 100 years, but to actually dismantle the wreckage altogether. I believe the documentary is a PBS NOVA episode called Building Chernobyl's MegaTomb.
@JKSSubstandard
@JKSSubstandard 2 жыл бұрын
Correct. There were a few goals with new containment. 1) replace and then dismantle the original sarcophogas. 2) make the reactor building water tight. The original sarcophogas was not water tight and allowed rainfall into the reactor building. The drying up of the water in the basement of the reactor building is responsible for the recent high readings at chernobyl as the flooding is no longer there to moderate the corium. Which 3) will allow workers to enter the containment and finally defeul the reactor and begin clearing the monster. If successful, in theory they would be able to bury what's left and not need another containment building in 100+ years
@minty_Joe
@minty_Joe Жыл бұрын
@@JKSSubstandard For step #3, they should just let the machines do all the work. The idea of using humans again to remove and clean up the fuel is unnerving. They used "bio-robot/liquidators" in the beginning, which contributed to many deaths, injuries and disabilities for those who survived.
@erinfreeman4149
@erinfreeman4149 Жыл бұрын
@@minty_Joe From what i understand there is a robotic arm in the new building to do it however there was a building built near it so it can be controlled form there. and people have to drive the trucks away from the site with some of the old parts. so they have minimized the amount of people in the operation as possible.
@bradsmithstudios8881
@bradsmithstudios8881 2 жыл бұрын
I’m a layman, but I loved the Chernobyl series, and I’m loving your reaction series. Great videos! Thank you!
@TheAtomicAgeCM
@TheAtomicAgeCM 2 жыл бұрын
thank you!
@mikeschiavello7068
@mikeschiavello7068 2 жыл бұрын
The US government does own the reactors on nuclear submarines, and those are highly classified.
@TheAtomicAgeCM
@TheAtomicAgeCM 2 жыл бұрын
Yup, not used for US Power Grid electrical generation.
@foxs683ss
@foxs683ss 2 жыл бұрын
@@TheAtomicAgeCM Well there was that one time....
@platospotatoes6205
@platospotatoes6205 2 жыл бұрын
There are lots of government owned reactors, but as conditioned in the video, none whose principle purpose is electricity generation for consumption by the general grid.
@mikeschiavello7068
@mikeschiavello7068 2 жыл бұрын
@@platospotatoes6205 It's strange how both private and government owned reactors are still PWR's, yet privately owned are well known, and government owned are not.
@platospotatoes6205
@platospotatoes6205 2 жыл бұрын
@@mikeschiavello7068 PWR is a "pressurized water reactor" as opposed to a BWR "boiling water reactor" - government-owned reactors are typically smaller research reactors or test reactors, and are often through the US Dept of Energy and so aren't subject to the same level of public transparency/oversight as (commercial) power reactors. Seeing as they don't need to produce electricity for the grid, there is no incentive to put them next to population centers (electricity demand), and so they can be sited remotely in restricted/limited access facilities like national labs.
@matthewgillies7509
@matthewgillies7509 2 жыл бұрын
I knew someone growing up whose mother was a nurse in Poland at the time of the disaster. The problem with radiation and pregnancy is down to metabolic rates of the fetus and the mother. A pregnant woman's body is already functioning at its maximum capacity with regards to immune function and metabolism, well above the rates seen in men and children. There is a very fine line that exists between a body's ability to compensate in that state, not entirely dissimilar to the elderly, except recovery occurs post-pregnancy. Therefore, pregnant women are considered to be at significant risk to adverse effects from a variety of causes. This is why certain treatments, drugs, and inoculations are avoided while pregnant. Now, the unborn child due to the nature of human gestation is vulnerable to the lifestyle and diet of the mother-to-be, and her environment. Just as toxins and pathogens (and immunities) can be passed to the child, so to can absorbed radiation, which can occur at a faster rate within the child. While I'm uncertain of specific case studies, due to the rarity of such incidents, it was supposed in Poland and the Soviet Union that the fetuses would draw radioactive iodine into their systems away from the mothers, and that modest exposure of the adult could adversely effect the child, due to their faster metabolism and the concentration of radioactivity in their developing cells. This theory is put into use for more positive outcomes when doctors give high doses of anti-viral drugs to HIV+ mothers as a means to prevent their children from being born with that disease. The nurse from Poland unfortunately recalled many healthy mothers choosing to abort their babies during the Chernobyl incident, even if they were not considered as high risk of exposure at the time, due to their location.
@joelgarcia1782
@joelgarcia1782 2 жыл бұрын
The speech General Tarakanov gives to the liquidators before they start to work in the roof has been kept identical by the series to the one you will find in the documentaries from the accident. You can see it in “Chernobyl 3828” a documentary made by Valery Starodumov, a dosimetrist that worked on the roof cleaniing. He actually is the guy that “ringed the bell” hitting a piece of steel to warn the liquidators they have completed the “safe time” on the roof.
@meghanhause9435
@meghanhause9435 2 жыл бұрын
Speaking of that General, I think he is still alive, but has to take a ton of meds everyday to stay alive. I read an article about him, and he grave praise to actor that played him in the mini series
@politedog4959
@politedog4959 2 жыл бұрын
Yeah, id like to see a reaction to Chernobyl 3828
@-8l-924
@-8l-924 2 жыл бұрын
always a good day when I see an update in this series
@rachelaugustine3125
@rachelaugustine3125 2 жыл бұрын
Can’t wait for the next one! Rewatched the series just because of your prior videos
@vilestine
@vilestine 2 жыл бұрын
I binged all 4 of your reactions back to back, please come out with the last one as soon as you can!
@CRAIGMASTER2
@CRAIGMASTER2 2 жыл бұрын
Steam voids in the coolant channels can also help with heat transfer in a process called nucleate boiling when the steam voids created on the channel walls leave the walls and enter the coolant channel and transfer the heat to the water turning the steam voids back to water. However depending on conditions of the coolant it can lead to dryout of the coolant channel or a departure from nucleate boiling causing steam voids not to leave the channel walls, both reducing overall heat transfer.
@Holyrock91
@Holyrock91 2 жыл бұрын
Just recently discovered this series, watched through it all and now I can’t wait for episode 5. Peaked my interest in science for sure.
@wiseauserious8750
@wiseauserious8750 2 жыл бұрын
I wish I could go back in time and watch episode 5 of this masterpiece show with fresh eyes
@lookslikerain6758
@lookslikerain6758 2 жыл бұрын
Hi, I’m not a nuclear physicist, nor do I do anything in this field at all. I am also not a nuclear reactor myself. However, I just came across these videos today and have watched them all and I hope part 5 is coming soon☺️
@RTCMAHL
@RTCMAHL 2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for explaining all of this! Love the show and really appreciate knowing how everything works.
@justinsingree2565
@justinsingree2565 2 жыл бұрын
The two producers of Xenon are directly from uranium, but most Xenon is produced by the decaying of Iodine 135; usually, Xenon directly from fission is so low you can ignore it for most calculations. So the source of your Xenon is determined by the power you had around 8-10 hours ago. The most significant way of removing Xenon is by absorbing a neutron, so your current power level with another option of waiting for it to natural decay. So when power was much higher 8 hours ago than it is now, you have much more Xenon being produced than is being removed, increasing the concentration and lowering reactivity. So when power 8-10 hours ago was much lower, you are removing Xenon faster than it's being produced, reducing concentration and increasing reactivity. When power has been around the same level for a while, the incoming Xenon will equal the Xenon being burned, and you are at a state known as equilibrium xenon. I operated a reactor for the US Navy, and we had much more power changes that would be experienced at a typical power plant and saw the effects of Xenon changes a lot.
@thanatosstorm
@thanatosstorm 2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for your service squid. I'm honestly still researching this stuff for my sci-fi books, but as a tanker I dealt in depleted uranium rather than the fissile materials. I don't think people understand how difficult the balancing must be in a Nimitz or an attack/missile boat.
@Whatever_works
@Whatever_works 2 жыл бұрын
Gosh that took a minute… glad you are back doing these!! You make it much easier for my lameness understanding of nuclear material
@marklanfier8287
@marklanfier8287 2 жыл бұрын
Love your content, can’t wait to see your reaction to Episode 5.
@jaxman1235
@jaxman1235 2 жыл бұрын
Great job! Love your videos on this series. Your insight on this series really answers a lot of questions. I Binge-Watched the whole series in one night when it came out on HBO. Have followed what occured at Chernobyl for some years. Watching the series was like seeing a real life horror movie unfold right before your eyes. Am so glad that this is under control now. A lot of people sacrificed their lives and careers so that others would live. Grateful for them.
@tannedbrunette1
@tannedbrunette1 2 жыл бұрын
I love these videos. Thank you for doing this!
@happybunny4836
@happybunny4836 2 жыл бұрын
Ahhhh!! I just found you today and binge watched your reaction to this series and now I’m at the end :( can’t wait for the next one!!
@johnthebaptist9828
@johnthebaptist9828 2 жыл бұрын
Hey man really enjoy the series, glad you took the time and effort and continue it.
@4realjacob637
@4realjacob637 2 жыл бұрын
I've been anxiously waiting for this video
@patrickptmonk8673
@patrickptmonk8673 2 жыл бұрын
bout dang time. been waiting for this.
@gabriellaritaart
@gabriellaritaart 2 жыл бұрын
Thank for this video, i love your commentaries on this series
@TheAtomicAgeCM
@TheAtomicAgeCM 2 жыл бұрын
You're welcome! And thank you.
@timb83
@timb83 2 жыл бұрын
My recollection from nuclear safety at orientation ~15 years ago is that developing humans (fetuses, children) and the very old are more sensitive to radiation. Thus the NRC maximum dose for a pregnant woman is half that (during the pregnancy) than a non-pregnant worker. So it's incorrect to say the baby "absorbed the radiation that would have killed the mother" but completely possible that radiation that caused minimal acute symptoms in the mother ultimately killed the baby. Is that because of the mass differences (increased probability the radiation would interact with critical anatomy)? Or that genetic anomalies caused by irradiation propagate much quicker in developing bodies than developed ones? Someone in medical physics will have to answer that question.
@TykeMison_
@TykeMison_ 2 жыл бұрын
Mass differences/critical anatomy would be correct, a more technical way to say it is "this (developing) human has X times less cells, so the same body-area dose impacts an X larger proportion of sensitive anatomy"
@Falcrist
@Falcrist 2 жыл бұрын
I am not in medical physics, but I had this conversation with a physics professor who specialized in medical physics. He pointed out that DNA and cells in general are most vulnerable to the disruptive effects of radiation during cell division. Therefor fetuses are much more sensitive to radiation.
@andieslandies
@andieslandies 2 жыл бұрын
Sorry, slightly off topic. I find it surprising that NRC sets the dose constraint for a pregnant worker at 50% of a non-pregnant worker. My understanding was that IAEA recommends that dose constraints for pregnant workers are the same as for a member of the public (on the basis that the feotus is not a worker); that's certainly how it's regulated in Australia.
@bobthebomb1596
@bobthebomb1596 2 жыл бұрын
@@andieslandies Pretty sure that is the case in the UK too.
@willerwin3201
@willerwin3201 2 жыл бұрын
Minor correction: the older you get, the less sensitive you are to radiation damage. Cell division slows with age, and you have fewer years for an extra cancer to kill you.
@benlockhart8721
@benlockhart8721 2 жыл бұрын
I just wanted to say as someone who is learning more about nuclear physics for personal interest, your videos are very very good and incredibly interesting. Keep on going!
@Nefville
@Nefville 2 жыл бұрын
Charlie Murphy! Interesting mental picture, "the baby absorbed the radiation", I see the liquidators on the roof holding up babies as radiation shields. "It's 90 seconds without a baby, 90 minutes with a baby!" grab a baby and get to work boys!
@eloy2169
@eloy2169 4 ай бұрын
3:23 yep, fluorine fires are no joke. One of the most volatile substances is basically just fluorine and can make concrete “catch on fire” ,for lack of a better term
@texasrattlesnake31637
@texasrattlesnake31637 2 жыл бұрын
Awesome reaction and analysis bro! Definitely learned a lot about how it all works in relation to nuclear reactors - just subbed already bro'! Looking forward to the finale!
@nzagami88
@nzagami88 2 жыл бұрын
Been waiting for this for a week
@neryskkiran1820
@neryskkiran1820 7 ай бұрын
Thanks for doing these.
@TheAtomicAgeCM
@TheAtomicAgeCM 7 ай бұрын
You're welcome!
@TonyHammondTheBest
@TonyHammondTheBest 2 жыл бұрын
The new editing style looks great! Well done!
@frazerguest2864
@frazerguest2864 Жыл бұрын
Good video. Many thanks
@SylviusTheMad
@SylviusTheMad 2 жыл бұрын
Regarding access to science books being controlled: In the 1990s, in an attempt to save money on textbooks, some Canadian engineering students tried to buy their books directly from the publisher (McGraw Hill) rather than the university bookstore. All of the books they ordered were available for purchase in the university bookstore (in Canada), but McGraw Hill shipped from the US. The US State Department denied export to some of the chemistry books on the grounds that the students did not possess permits to export military secrets.
@matthayward7889
@matthayward7889 2 жыл бұрын
Another great video!
@davidmccarthy9300
@davidmccarthy9300 2 жыл бұрын
Awesome series man ! I’m a dental practitioner and my past time is nuclear physics thanks for helping me through some tough times !!
@bobschannel1844
@bobschannel1844 2 жыл бұрын
Love these. Keep it up please.
@stutzpunkt
@stutzpunkt 2 жыл бұрын
Hey buddy! Love your work. Thank you
@Dihuda
@Dihuda 2 жыл бұрын
Well done! Thank you!
@galidroo
@galidroo 2 жыл бұрын
thanks for the video dude :)
@kennedytaylor4783
@kennedytaylor4783 2 жыл бұрын
I just recently discovered the mini series Chernobyl, and as a layperson I appreciate your simple explanations of this complex topic.
@dontdodrugs8538
@dontdodrugs8538 2 жыл бұрын
Finally! Please finish up the whole series
@LogicalNiko
@LogicalNiko 2 жыл бұрын
One of the flaws in the Soviet structure of the day was that the authority above you (state/party) was always right. Even when they were wrong, they had to be right. So if they said the design was perfect, or the risk of an operation was low, it had to be whatever they said or else you would be replaced with someone who would unquestionably think that.
@Merssedes
@Merssedes 2 жыл бұрын
Yep. And anything that can question their rightness becomes classified. Because politics.
@simonphoenix5768
@simonphoenix5768 2 жыл бұрын
yup kind of reminds us of the democrat party in 2021
@JM-vm9jr
@JM-vm9jr 2 жыл бұрын
Excellent work Charlie!!! You got some talent for sure!
@TheAtomicAgeCM
@TheAtomicAgeCM 2 жыл бұрын
Thank you!
@JM-vm9jr
@JM-vm9jr 2 жыл бұрын
@@TheAtomicAgeCM You’re absolutely welcome brother! Great idea with the medium close-up dropped into the spherical, floating bubble! Color temperature and saturation looks quite warm and the tint has shifted from cool, blue-green to orange/peach/red. Looks like 1990s, 35mm film stock that is not contrasty and does not exhibit signs of the skip-bleach process or silver retention film lab processing seen in films such as 7even, fight club, Snatch and saving Private Ryan. Much better organization and composition of frame now and we see that possibly layering/superimposing is the key. On the other hand- juxtaposition of several moving images, rectangles or frames, causes a bottle necking and congestion of the screen or the left+center+right frame including the rule of thirds and also eyelines. Eyelines are not that big of an issue if you are not filming yourself talking to another person with editing POVs So, you’ve made some great modifications Charlie! Hope this helps, man! Be well and stay safe!
@UniqueTrash
@UniqueTrash 2 жыл бұрын
I’ve been absolutely loving this series!
@sweetlooshi322
@sweetlooshi322 2 жыл бұрын
I’m so hyped for this last episode. I love getting educated on this part of stuff. I honestly think the science is so nutty.
@TheAtomicAgeCM
@TheAtomicAgeCM 2 жыл бұрын
Awesome! I agree, it's crazy that we are capable of doing this kind of stuff.
@sweetlooshi322
@sweetlooshi322 2 жыл бұрын
@@TheAtomicAgeCM Yeah science is like modern magic.
@Malibutomi
@Malibutomi 2 жыл бұрын
what a timing, just finished the first 3 reaction this morning haha
@ForTheFREEMAN
@ForTheFREEMAN 2 жыл бұрын
Ladies and gents he's back! fantastic video!
@BackwoodsLaw
@BackwoodsLaw 2 жыл бұрын
have watched all of these so far, good break down of most of the stuff that made my head split in half as BS. Good resource for public info on responses here in the US is the FEMA site. Most of the plans are just very general and high level, but gives you a way to contrast and compare how it would be dealt with here, were it to happen. We also do have specialized teams that are trained up and on stand by for a call from NIST that are US Army and USMC active duty units, they have a wide breadth of specialist that are assigned from medical to weapons specialist if needed by NIST.
@mrthatdude9275
@mrthatdude9275 2 жыл бұрын
YESSSSSSSS I've been waiting
@wesleysmith5275
@wesleysmith5275 2 жыл бұрын
absolutely great content. stay with your expertise and mixing it with a passion and you'll do well on youtube
@coolnamesweretaken1
@coolnamesweretaken1 2 жыл бұрын
Keep up the good work! 👍
@syntaxerorr
@syntaxerorr 2 жыл бұрын
Great video.
@AlphaLimaXray
@AlphaLimaXray 2 жыл бұрын
That concrete "Sarcophagus" originally erected over the ruins of Reactor 4 is still there, but it is slowly crumbling. How much of that is due to the radiation is debatable, but the major factors are weather and water related. Plus parts of that containment building rest on compromised structures and/or other items not designed to indefinitely support the weight. The New Safe Confinement not only covers the structure, it has ventilation systems the Sarcophagus lacks to prevent dust and contaminants from escaping into the atmosphere. It also supports two huge, remotely operated gantry cranes, which will slowly dismantle the old containment structure and the ruins of the reactor building beneath it, as well as the parts of the reactor itself. Most of this will be placed in permanent dry storage casks and taken to a long-term storage facility. Once all of the nuclear waste is completely removed, and everything stripped down to the foundations, the site will be permanently capped off, most likely with concrete. This process is expected to take a few decades.
@toddydoyle
@toddydoyle 2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the insight.
@scrungo8635
@scrungo8635 2 жыл бұрын
Been on a bender of nuclear physics videos ever since I wathed an MIT lecutre about the chernobyl disaster. Your channel is one of the best I've come across. Keep up the good work!
@TheAtomicAgeCM
@TheAtomicAgeCM 2 жыл бұрын
Thanks so much! That means a lot to me.
@mccarthy5825
@mccarthy5825 2 жыл бұрын
Yes! Delighted this just popped up. I only subbed a few days ago and am enjoying your work so very much. You are very good at engaging the audience and presenting your information in an interesting and thought provoking way. You can tell how well you know your stuff because you can explain quite complex topics very clearly. Also the fact you do corrections is brilliant. Very very few people would do that and it brings a hell of a lot of class to your channel. The channel is really brilliant and I wish you nothing but the best for the future. KZfaq needs excellent and informative channels like this and you have the talent and knowledge for sure. All the best from 🇮🇪 👍( I still remember the orange boxes of iodine tablets the Irish government sent out to the east coast because they were so scared of Sellafield being attacked.i bet my mam has them in her 'everything drawer!)
@TheAtomicAgeCM
@TheAtomicAgeCM 2 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much! Glad to get the best from my ancestral homeland
@mccarthy5825
@mccarthy5825 2 жыл бұрын
@@TheAtomicAgeCM Murphy of course! Thank you for the reply. Made my day. Currently I'm reading Voices from Chernobyl, Midnight at Chernobyl, Atomic Bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, The Plutonium Files, The Apocalypse Factory. I've just finished Samson Option, Doomsday Machine: Confessions of a Nuclear War Planner, The Bomb and Able Archer 83. Absolutely fascinating stuff. I have taught English before and I can recognise your talent for presenting material like this in a fashion that can be understood and absorbed. It's a delight to see your enthusiasm for your field too. Oh if you want epubs of any of those books let me know. As amazing as teller-ulam bombs and molten salt reactors are... Books imo, are the best technology ever. Always a pint or two with your name on it if you make it to Dublin!
@mccarthy5825
@mccarthy5825 2 жыл бұрын
@@TheAtomicAgeCM also I would love to hear your opinion on the danger of Sellafield to irish East Coast. The Irish government certainly believed so in the 90s. AFAIK the buildings are hardened to attack by plane or whatever and its mainly a spent fuel processing and waste disposal facility now but I vividly remember the fear when those tablets got sent out and every newspaper and TV programme was talking of the nuclear disaster on an apocalyptic level we faced. Looking forward to the next video and wishing you and family an great Christmas!
@josephmassaro
@josephmassaro 2 жыл бұрын
I'm trying to envision the kid friendly animated graphic explaining the "egg basket." Dozens of little particles bouncing off a cod piece like bullets bouncing off Superman's chest.
@TheAtomicAgeCM
@TheAtomicAgeCM 2 жыл бұрын
Haha makes me think of the Fallout bobblehead and some kind of 50s sarcastic thing.
@RaKalamando
@RaKalamando 2 жыл бұрын
Very nice!
@swokatsamsiyu3590
@swokatsamsiyu3590 2 жыл бұрын
The reason why she wasn't allowed to see certain reports and reading materials has to do with the fact that in the Soviet Union civil nuclear power was seen as a state secret and as such fell under direct KGB jurisdiction. They even had a special department called "Ministry of Medium Machine Building" erected for it. Everything was highly Top Secret and on a Need-to-Know basis only. As to your question about the baby. Yes, this is a true event. I have several books about the Chernobyl disaster and one of them has direct eyewitness accounts in it from the actual people involved like the Liquidators, family of the firefighters, control room staff, evacuees etc.. The eyewitness account of Ignatenko's wife, Lyudmila, is it too. She very vividly describes how her husband, Vasily, deteriorated by the hour in the later stages. And it is every bit as gruesome as we think it is. She also explains about the death of her newborn child. It has to do with that radiation attacks the fastest dividing living cells first. That's why things like the thyroid and bone-marrow get attacked first compared to, say, muscle tissue. That divides a lot slower compared to the first two. Since the baby has the fastest dividing cells compared to the mother, the radiation went there first. It was born and lived for four hours. It had severe cirrhosis of the liver and a badly malformed heart. If you're interested, the book is "Chernobyl Prayer" by Nobel Laureate Svetlana Alexievich.
@blorp.1956
@blorp.1956 2 жыл бұрын
I'm sure the baby did die, the issue is more saying the baby was somehow a "radiation sponge" for the mother - that part really doesn't make sense.
@swokatsamsiyu3590
@swokatsamsiyu3590 2 жыл бұрын
@@blorp.1956 It may be a poor choice of words, but that is essentially what happened. Read my explanation about the fastest dividing cells. That's why the radiation bypassed the mother (for the most part) and attacked the baby more violently. It had the fastest dividing cells of the two organisms, so the radiation went there first. And since the baby is that much smaller than its mother, the allowable dose will be much lower, the damage will be bigger and more lethal faster. Let's just agree that it was bad news all around.
@blorp.1956
@blorp.1956 2 жыл бұрын
@@swokatsamsiyu3590 I did read your reply, but also once a foetus is in the 3rd trimester the risks of teratogens to do harm are much lower (unclear how far along she was, but I'll assume towards the end of her pregnancy when it all happened?) so it was probably just more the dose vs. size of the foetus rather than any innate issues to do with the foetus itself.
@swokatsamsiyu3590
@swokatsamsiyu3590 2 жыл бұрын
@@blorp.1956 From what I could gather she was either near the end of the first trimester, or just crossed over into the second. Other sources say she was around 6-7 months pregnant. And I agree with your last statement, you just worded it better than I did^^
@u.v.s.5583
@u.v.s.5583 Жыл бұрын
To call ministry of medium machine building a DEPARTMENT is delusional. Imagine an absolutely huge ginormous secret machine with tens of thousands of employees and secret, but extremely huge budget measuring percents of GDP of Soviet Union. That is your department. It is the Soviet nuclear army. In fact, Chernobyl power plant did not fall under jurisdiction of this department, only the reactor was theirs. The whole plant around the reactor they had nothing to do with, that was under Ukrainian ministry of energy. Don't ask me how it was even supposed to work.
@-JG-339
@-JG-339 2 жыл бұрын
14:14 actually the new cover was built with the purpose of finally dismantling the core and removing all of the nuclear waste for permanent storage. So let hope no new building will be needed
@TheAtomicAgeCM
@TheAtomicAgeCM 2 жыл бұрын
Oh really. Nice to know, thank you.
@marklanfier8287
@marklanfier8287 2 жыл бұрын
I was just about to say the same thing.
@concretmixer
@concretmixer 2 жыл бұрын
Didn't they build remote cranes inside the building to dismantle it?
@-JG-339
@-JG-339 2 жыл бұрын
@@concretmixer i think it is much more complicated then that. They do need to disassemble half of the building to get to where the core melted to.
@airborneofficer2640
@airborneofficer2640 2 жыл бұрын
Well that is gonna be pushed back a bit now
@guymorad4593
@guymorad4593 2 жыл бұрын
I respect this guy so much for not nitpicking at things that are clearly there for cinematic purposes!
@KarinaMilne
@KarinaMilne 2 жыл бұрын
I’d love to see further episodes on other nuclear incidents!
@userofthetube2701
@userofthetube2701 2 жыл бұрын
You'd be surprised at the seemingly trivial things that were considered secret back in the days of Cold War paranoia. Or at the things that were not secret but nobody talked about anyway out of fear that someone would decide that actually it was secret after all.
@johan.ohgren
@johan.ohgren 2 жыл бұрын
It's not only back in the day. Even today things get classified only to save someones face.
@thespaceman2743
@thespaceman2743 2 жыл бұрын
Prior to this series Chernobyl was something that had my interest but after watching your series covering the show and more so the disaster itself my interest in the disaster and the physics behind it all has skyrocketed to something more a strong interest in radiation and the physics of it and the way it works and truly I just want to say thank you for that because it’s not necessarily something I would think I would’ve gotten interested in if it weren’t for your videos
@TheAtomicAgeCM
@TheAtomicAgeCM 2 жыл бұрын
That's awesome, really glad to hear that.
@greymoonz1
@greymoonz1 2 жыл бұрын
Nope, I don't want to wait longer to see your next episode. This is too interesting.
@TheAtomicAgeCM
@TheAtomicAgeCM 2 жыл бұрын
Thanks so much! Made my day. Part 5 won't be until January some time.
@the_kombinator
@the_kombinator 2 жыл бұрын
Every time I hear you say "from the Atomic Age" in my head I add "OF RENEGADES!" and I go down a Tom Morello rabbit hole. BTW excellent explanation of positive void coefficient - I was able to see it clearly in my head when you were explaining it (having studied RBMK and CANDU type reactor schematics did help with imagining the localization of the components) - not many people can do that. :D
@TheAtomicAgeCM
@TheAtomicAgeCM 2 жыл бұрын
Yes, Rage it up! Glad my description worked so well for you
@MantraHerbInchSin
@MantraHerbInchSin 2 жыл бұрын
Oh man I laughed wit h the egg basket xD It's really good that there are not many big earthquakes in that area... Building a dome like that, that can withstand quakes, must be so much more difficult to build
@SubvertTheState
@SubvertTheState 2 жыл бұрын
Nice new set up man
@TheAtomicAgeCM
@TheAtomicAgeCM 2 жыл бұрын
Appreciate it
@richf.7845
@richf.7845 2 жыл бұрын
“The baby pulls a lot of resources from the mother. I want to learn more about this process.” Dude, you need to get out more. :) :)
@TheAtomicAgeCM
@TheAtomicAgeCM 2 жыл бұрын
they don't let me out much haha
@johnthomas1433
@johnthomas1433 2 жыл бұрын
Why must you upload RIGHT before i got to bed WHYYYYYY :'(... time to watch lol
@carymattgmail
@carymattgmail 2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the fun commentary! How necessary do you think was the culling of animals like the stray dogs? I can understand not wanting them to transport radioactive material out of the area around Chernobyl, but on the other hand there will always be a lot of animals like birds that you aren't going to be able to cull.
@Dobviews
@Dobviews 2 жыл бұрын
The New Safe Confinement Building was built with special cranes on the inside to start tearing down the sarcophagus built in 86. The NSC was built in two large pieces then slid over the old sarcophagus covering the damaged reactor. It is so far the largest building ever to be moved laterally into position using teflon like sliders creeping a few inches per hour over a course of days.
@FlarGarg
@FlarGarg 2 жыл бұрын
new containment facility was build on the side and then moved over the reactor on large tracks. It is airtight now. It was specifically engineered and build to contain everything, including the old Sarcophagus. Now, the work of carefully deconstructing, decontaminating and preparing for safe storage of everything that can be processed that way is ongoing, including the parts of the old structure. There`s been rumors about old Sarcophagus collapsing, yet they`ve been disproven as far as i know. However the construction wasn`t in great shape. Basically, every country in the world helped to build new containment facility. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chernobyl_New_Safe_Confinement its referred as NSC or, rarer, the Arch ("Akra" locally). NSC was placed over the reactor in September 2017.
@pavoutsinas
@pavoutsinas 2 жыл бұрын
great channel name
@nilnull5457
@nilnull5457 2 жыл бұрын
If a reactor falls below the lower limit or is scrammed, it has to be kept shut down for 3 days for Xe-135 to naturally decay away.
@DinerLingo
@DinerLingo 2 жыл бұрын
Was beginning to worry whether or not we'd see a new episode!
@TheAtomicAgeCM
@TheAtomicAgeCM 2 жыл бұрын
never fear!
@Dr.TJ_Eckleburg
@Dr.TJ_Eckleburg 2 жыл бұрын
The steam void discussion was interesting, it's not completely dissimilar from the water cooling system on an automotive engine. It's important push all the air bubbles out of the system before sealing it up, because they will cause voids in the water jackets around the cylinders and lead to the engine overheating.
@sergiofabrietti9960
@sergiofabrietti9960 2 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much! :) Quick feedback: I personally preferred the previous layout, with a miniaturized player on the right. Don't really like the blurred background. Waiting for the last one!!!!!
@RaKalamando
@RaKalamando 2 жыл бұрын
He might have to do that to avoid copyright strikes
@sergiofabrietti9960
@sergiofabrietti9960 2 жыл бұрын
@@RaKalamando makes sense
@Matt-vv7fl
@Matt-vv7fl 2 жыл бұрын
Just want to say that I've watched a lot of reaction videos on the chernobyl series and these were done by regular folks, KZfaq reactors without any first hand knowledge of nuclear physics. Those reactions are fine, and convey the emotional impact that the series was intended to create, but lack depth or substance. Your reactions are done with a critical eye for detail and a healthy amount of criticism on the perhaps more exaggerated parts of the series. It's very informative and helpful. I also like that you point out the gaps in your own knowledge. I think all intelligent people freely admit the limits of their knowledge while the ignorant are convinced their knowledge is absolute. All this is to say very good job! I've enjoyed your reaction to this series and looking forward to the conclusion.
@TheAtomicAgeCM
@TheAtomicAgeCM 2 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much! Very kind words. I'm looking forward to the conclusion as well - my part is going to be much more in depth.
@blorp.1956
@blorp.1956 2 жыл бұрын
Really enjoying this series! I really appreciate how you can break down complex concepts, and you don't pretend to know what you don't know. Regarding the death of the baby, I agree that it's more likely that the baby had a fatal dose purely based on size, rather than it being some kind of radiation sponge for the mother. It also might have died from something totally unrelated and they just assumed this was why it died. But yeah it would be much easier to knock out the bone marrow and thyroid of a baby (which would normally have a poor immune system having just been born), baby could have died from sepsis and/or severe hypothroidism. edit: or bleeding and anaemia! forgot about the other important stuff in marrow lol. birth is very traumatic, and a baby with no platelets could die from a brain haemorrhage very swiftly.
@BedsitBob
@BedsitBob Ай бұрын
The replacement cover is the called the NSC New Safe Confinement.
@scasny
@scasny 2 жыл бұрын
i have faint memory that the xenon problem was also what cause the Windscale fire. They were also cutting corners (and fins) and bypass safety measures to increase productivity because there was nuclear (friendly) competition between US and UK.
@herbert92x
@herbert92x Жыл бұрын
Great presentation. Also a good example of why engineers shouldn’t be screenwriters. That’s not a criticism, my father in law was a nuclear submariner, it’s though to watch a submarine movie with him - he starts criticizing the pipe layout on the set. 😉
@TheAtomicAgeCM
@TheAtomicAgeCM Жыл бұрын
haha "but we have to teach them calculus first!" I think I can pretty good about turning my brain off when I watch movies, this is just fun to do :)
버블티로 체감되는 요즘 물가
00:16
진영민yeongmin
Рет қаралды 115 МЛН
Always be more smart #shorts
00:32
Jin and Hattie
Рет қаралды 48 МЛН
KINDNESS ALWAYS COME BACK
00:59
dednahype
Рет қаралды 133 МЛН
I Got Access to Chernobyl’s Deadliest Area
12:56
Kyle Hill
Рет қаралды 3,2 МЛН
this show may actually destroy me...*CHERNOBYL* (part 1/2)
41:09
Natalie Gold
Рет қаралды 326 М.
The Chernobyl Helicopter Crash: The Untold Story
11:28
That Chernobyl Guy
Рет қаралды 500 М.
Nuclear Engineer Break Down of Fat Man and Little Boy
28:41
The Atomic Age
Рет қаралды 33 М.
"What Is The Cost Of Lies?" | CHERNOBYL | Episode 5 Reaction
35:05
Haylo & Kiss
Рет қаралды 161 М.
Chernobyl goes to shit (part 3.6)
6:00
John Banana
Рет қаралды 116 М.
Chernobyl Episode 3 - Open Wide, O Earth - Nuclear Engineer Reacts
30:15
The Most Radioactive Man in History - Hisashi Ouchi
21:30
Peaked Interest
Рет қаралды 8 МЛН
Chernobyl Episode 1 - 1:23:45 - Nuclear Engineer Reacts
30:02
The Atomic Age
Рет қаралды 1 МЛН
Would Not Pressing AZ-5 SAVE Chernobyl?
10:07
That Chernobyl Guy
Рет қаралды 231 М.
버블티로 체감되는 요즘 물가
00:16
진영민yeongmin
Рет қаралды 115 МЛН