No matter how many times you say Apollo went to the moon, it doesn't change that it didn't happen, and as for Artimush, it wouldn't have got round the moon without the early 1970s soviet rs25 rocket motors that the US bought a bulk lot of for the space shuttle program. The Saturn V Never had the lifting capacity with its pathetic 50atmospheres rocket chamber pressure. And Elons scrapped any plans for crew. So don't be surprised if China is the first country to get a human above low earth orbit. They will need superconducting magnetic shielding to handle the radiation.

Lol @ "without media bias". What a charitable slogan when you really just mean overt bias sanitized. And in return, you hope that my fellow Chinese back home, who aren't so versed in "free world", will be naive just enough to fall for it. How I can't wait to go back to China. I'll be spilling the beans on how best to exploit "free world" "reporting".

I don't understand why only china able to match there dead line or launch its project before there actual date . How they do that even NASA can't do that even they have largest budgets when we compare to other govt space agencies

@@kojotasunashe8547 I think as a Chinese, I can talk about my understanding of why China follows the space program it promised and realizes it within the deadline. First of all, when proposing a plan, there will be a strict project feasibility discussion plan, and there will be a discussion and certification that lasts for several years. During this discussion phase, its content will be continuously updated. When the final project plan is finalized, it will be written into the next five-year plan. After being written into the five-year plan, in the next five years, the space program will be carried out successively, and the realization cycle will be even longer. Take why China built its own space station as an example. At first, China wanted to cooperate with NASA, but the United States issued a bill prohibiting China from joining the US space cooperation program. Therefore, China had to start from scratch with difficult independent research and development, and the birth process of the Chinese version of the GPS positioning system was actually the same. He was rejected and had to develop independently. From the beginning of the project to the official network and the start of the global Beidou satellite communication service, it has gone through a long research and development cycle. The second reason is that once a certain space program is included in the five-year plan, it will not change with the change of new government. It can be seen that the reused award-winning project of American sapceX company has achieved success and has a great advantage of cost saving. Chinese officials have not yet revealed the relevant research plans.

@@kojotasunashe8547 因为计划的一部分，就像上司给你的工作一样必须完成

NASA is leaded by politicians,but scientist in china@@kojotasunashe8547

@@kojotasunashe8547cultural and social system

Half a century too late, ask Buzz Aldrin, the second man to walk on the MOON .

@@Arturo-lapaz LOL

thanks for mentioning it

Hahaha 🤣😂

Hold my tsingtao

And still he stands there holding the beer for ever!😂

China: were going to land men on the moon Usa: that's soo 1969

@@mike4769 or they would have you believe…

Great lots of labor can be used to build space colonies.

Thanks Richard, glad you enjoy them 🙂

🙂+1🙂

Any wumao could put up such fake proppganda.

That is socialism in a nutshell, so this shouldn’t be surprising lol

Loord Modi seid vii ar a vedi poowerphul an supaapoower advans contri. In a few shoort yeears, vii wiil beuld a spaes baes on Mars befoor cpp cuuld evan beuld Mara rokiits

Made in China😂😂😂😂. But they do better than India. This I will give to China. At lease some countries bought J17. China love to exaggerate but the Indian is just too honest.

@@dylangtech 这与社会制度无关，制定合理计划然后实现它，这不是常理吗？

Since 9 years china didnt send any crew to moon ...why ? India plan for next year after soft landing . See the difference 😂

@Xrabittgaming: That's what the U.S is deathly afraid of! Hard as they might attempt to try the U.S will not be able to the Chinese and will only make matters worse for themselves by attempting

I was stunned when I saw that. However, it is probably just as reliable as a catch system as the SpaceX chopsticks. I am confused about how the cables will be able to survive the violence of the deceleration thrust plume.

This is pretty close to what I dreamt up as an alternative when I first saw the SpaceX chopsticks idea. As an engineer this system seems less sensitive to exact positioning than the chopsticks. In addition cables are lighter than chopsticks which allows them to be moved more quickly and/or with less power and the springiness of the cables appears beneficial too. Of course cables can break but it is possible to have multiple as a backup and cables can be made very strong too. I would expect that the chopsticks are preferable if the booster can be landed very precisely but the cables give more catching flexibility if the landing is a bit off. In any case the cable solution looks like a very good idea; maybe some amateurs/universities could do some evaluation with scale models. I don' t think it would be a big deal copying some good idea from the Chinese.

@@clay-tw5gc As far as I see the cables will still be quite far sideways when the exhaust plume passes through the square formed by the cables. The cables move in only when the engines are already below the level of the cables. Furthermore the cables could be under an overhead protection initially. I would be mostly worried that the cables damage the booster skin during the catch.

Thanks Jeffrey!

He will do it with few babies in his hands by then

Count on me! 😁

Loord Modi seid vii ar a vedi poowerphul an supaapoower advans contri. In a few shoort yeears, vii wiil beuld a spaes baes on Mars befoor cpp cuuld evan beuld Mara rokiits

impossible to live broadcast from the moon, you will only be getting images

@@zackwang9314 It will definitely be broadcast live, China has established a communication satellite orbiting the moon

@@zackwang9314 i think when amstrong went to moon, they did the live broadcast ?? How come?

@@creatormaxi8324 by making the video quality low, and having a really low frame rate to reduce the data needed to be transmitted

Thanks for your support! ☺️

Interesting bs? Lol

Did you know? China has never claimed that this is a space race, which the West has unilaterally claimed

@bvusjxlee3941 Lol of course its a space race. It's a race for technological superiority.

​@@bvusjxlee3941 So they just conveniently come up with plans for a lunar base, Just as Artemis is announced? Sure.

Chinese 'crewed' moob base still has to wait until the late 2030s at the earliest, ILRS is mostly focusing on a robotic moon base at first. So... if nothing else, US might build the crewed base first.

@@DOSFS Americans haven't caught up to Japanese 60s bullet trains. US moon base with Jewish space lasers. Thanks for the humour, made me laugh.

There is always a reason why they haven’t done something Iike this. If there is something more they can learn from a moon base they should do it but I think the amount of info they gathered from the moon made them realize a moon base would be expensive and accomplish nothing. Maybe space tourism is the main goal here.

@@DontUputThatEvilOnMe Cmon, America spent $1.7 Trillion on multiple failed F-35 jets that could have housed ALL the US homeless 29 times over and could have also been used for a moon base. Use military money, the rest of the world are sick and tired of the US helping countries by bombing them.

​@@DOSFSBefore 2030, it is 2029

Wumaos are just so fake n hillarious.😂😂😂

Celebrate the fact that china is 50 years behind the US. 😂

@@ChadwickTheChad China doesn' have hollywood or an advanced film industry 50 years ago 😂

@@zackwang9314 There is equipment on the moon used to bounce lasers off for measuring - how did it get there, little idiot?

@@zackwang9314you make me laugh to death

Bro nobody cares if china landed in the dark side , we will watch and see , good luck to China , good luck to my cousin who works in CNSA

Pooh PAID Bot , It's India which landed on the Dark side of Moon , First country to land on the dark side of Moon .

@@exploreandunravel5773 。。。😆😆

Better still, India owns the moon.

@@exploreandunravel5773 It is absolutely great to see what India reached this last week with the Chandrayaan-3 mission. It was only India's second attempt to land on the Moon and they achieved their goal to land on the South pole (Which is not the backside of the Moon as you claim. But India is nevertheless the first nation ever to land on the South pole, which is also a impressive achievement.). So yes India did a hell of a job, and I do think that the whole world does applaud for them, but China is the only nation that ever landed a rover on the backside of the Moon. Not even Russia and/or the US could do this yet. But maybe that it is time to set all nationalistic feelings a side ? We can be happy for every nation who does reach it's goals and helps humanity to improve their knowledge. ✌ (Greatings from the Netherlands, who will never land on the Moon. 😉)

China officially announced they will do it before 2030, and yes I think they will do it in 2029 because of the reason you mentioned.

Thanks Meiling!

Loord Modi seid vii ar a vedi poowerphul an supaapoower advans contri. In a few shoort yeears, vii wiil beuld a spaes baes on Mars befoor cpp cuuld evan beuld Mara rokiits

We all know Artemis is not gonna happen.....LMAO, explain.....Artemis 1 has already been accomplished by sending Orion Spacecraft , Artemis 2 with crew mission is set to launch in 2024 and they have selected 4 astronauts for this

Another unbeliever.

A moon landing would be good, but I’d rather see China achieve a just society by 2030.

anyway they will have to do it in 2028 by hook or by crook as the politician and planner's life is not involved.

Thanks Greg!

Technically there is an international standard, It’s how the Russian and US sides of the ISS are connected. Currently China uses its own docking standard based off of the same standard. While not currently physically or politically possible it could be in the future.

@@PhazzeeYeehawapart from the way the individual ISS modules are connected, Russian and NASA use different docking ports for their crew and cargo space craft.

After 2018, Chinese docking mechanism is compatible with IDSS (rev D). The Wikipedia page says compatible with APAS, which is an outdated information.

US once rejected China in space station will soon beg China for consideration to allow US to join in space exploration.

@@qiufusheng3058 I was thinking that the NASA lunar gateway could be used as a rescue island by China or Russia if anybody had problems in lunar Orbit. The gateway (currently planned to be tiny) could be extended in future by other countries modules.

Maybe China has their own SKubrick China lands man on moon this Xmas YES !

按照中国人的性格，不管你们是否到过月球，我们都不会说，就算到了非说不可的时候，大概率还是会说你们到过月球。

不光是中国，追求星辰大海，探索宇宙是全人类的梦想

The United States 🇺🇸 landed on the moon? The whole world is saying that it is fake news, and Hollywood helped to do it. How hard is it to go to the moon now?

You believe US did go to the moon with racktag DOS technology? LOL...

Wonder how they landed on the moon when technology was still primitive by today's standard. 50 years forward, the US can easily land a man on the moon in a heartbeat.

@@wongpohchan9485 Well, spacecraft have to be built and tested, physicists and mathematicians have to build models to accurately plan the operation and those models must be tested to improve the accuracy. Finally, spacecraft are very expensive and difficult to build, requiring custom fabrication. This is why it takes years to do and also why the US can’t just do it “easy,” it will take years of will and planning to pull off even though they went in the past.

If u really believe the usa landed on moon in 1969...I got bad news for you

Tosspot alert !!!

​@@sidstevens9035 briTITS alert

Ugh, yes of course 😧 thanks for pointing that out…

@@DongfangHour It's a tough job presenting, and being on the spot. I'm just trying to ensure the record is set straight in the these comments.

"More footprints on the moon..."? There are footprints on the moon? When did that happen? I know those are not human footprints.

Although there are many skeptics, China's top space workers say it is true.😢Questioning requires evidence. In China, most people admit that the United States did indeed land on the moon🎉

There are a lot of American equipment on the moon, And the trajectory of the Lunar rover. No matter what, we must be rational

Never knew that Asian people had been looking at the stars 🌟 with dreams and wonder 🤔.. Hmmmm.. I thought that the European does that.. hmmmm.. well done Asia 🌏.. Hmmmm.. if I could encourage my African people to look at the stars too ..hmmmm 🤔...

@@peaceleader7315 sounds like you are just not interested in progress in the east Or you have being limited by the western MSM and propaganda lol

Same as BBB world. Being reactive and not planned properly is the downfall of the USA plans and prestige. This is not the 70s where people can be tricked by Hollywood clips.

pretty sure nothing happened 50 years ago, only in a hollywood studio

​@@zackwang9314and China can't still develop the same type of superheavy lift rocket used in Apollo 11

Or just use two falcon heavy, SLS is way too expensive😂.

As USA has got too much money.

@@qiyuxuan9437 Each country should make good use of the technology it is good at. China is more mature in space docking technology. The United States has experience in building large rockets because of its previous competition with the Soviet Union.

No. NASA isn’t looking to repeat what’s already been done. It’s trying to innovate and build the advanced technologies that will enable human exploration of the solar system and colonies off world, technology China will eventually steal once the US has perfected it (as always). Starship & New Glenn will revolutionise the way we look at building things in space and solving the boil-off problem with Hydrogen & LOX + Rapid reusability will truly start a new era. Stop being short sighted and think bigger.

They can and it's happen on 2025

Space is an inhospitable place for humans and it’s distant and expensive to land us on the moon, hence how few Apollo missions there have been or why there’s not been one for awhile

Spielberg will make it happen!

@@lotsofthisandthat9791 Stanley Kubrick did it in 1969. This time, the movie will look more realistic.

Whackadoodle alert !!!

yall literally watched 15 minutes of Chinese powerpoint and CGI animations and you have the gall to accuse America of having a fake space program. smdh.

@@leeswecho Nasa does not know how to go to the moon and land now. Only stupid iditos beleives they did it 60 years ago.

And shall be Unable to set foot, 3,000 more years from now..🎈😌