China vs Japan: The Diaoyu/Senkaku-Islands dispute

  Рет қаралды 135,705

Politics with Paint

Politics with Paint

Күн бұрын

This video explains the territorial dispute over the Diaoyu or Senkaku Islands between China, Japan and Taiwan. The conflict exists in its current form since the 1970s and has caused worrying incidents involving Chinese, Japanese and Taiwanese militaries and navies, which some have argued could even lead to war.
Due to the political nature of this conflict, conversations over this topic tend to get heated or one-sided. In this video I try to present the facts of the conflict as neutrally as possible. Reaching a better mutual understanding is often the first step towards solving a problem. I hope this video can contribute to that.
Thanks for watching!
Consider subscribing for more videos with hopefully better quality!
____________________
Consider supporting this channel on Patreon:
Link to my Patreon: / politicswithpaint
____________________
Wendover Production's "China's Geography Problem": • China's Geography Problem
____________________
Timestamps:
0:00 Introduction
1:27 Chinese & Taiwanese point of view
3:03 Japanese point of view
4:36 History after 1945
6:02 Recent events
7:22 Taiwan's difficult position
9:39 Reasons behind the conflict
10:01 Economic value of the Islands
11:31 Strategic value of the Islands
12:18 Symbolic value of the Islands
14:06 Conclusion and Outro
____________________
Sources:
Hagström, Linus (2005) Japan's China Policy. Taylor and Francis.
Hollihan, Thomas A. (2014) The Dispute Over the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands. Springer Palgrave Macmillan.
Monika Chansoria (2018) China, Japan, and Senkaku Islands: Conflict in the East China Sea Amid an American Shadow. Routledge.
____________________
#china #japan #conflict

Пікірлер: 763
@tylerzeng6692
@tylerzeng6692 3 жыл бұрын
Saw it on the news one time, Taiwanese ship rolled up to Diaoyutai, and forgot to bring a 🇹🇼 flag. They brought a 🇨🇳 flag instead 🤣🤣
@grosstraktorkrupp7651
@grosstraktorkrupp7651 3 жыл бұрын
Oh no xd got me roll'in if this is true
@ML-kj3fr
@ML-kj3fr 3 жыл бұрын
因为现在中华民国的领导都是日本人的狗。哦,不对,蔡英文苏贞昌从父辈开始就是日本人的狗了。
@tylerzeng6692
@tylerzeng6692 3 жыл бұрын
​@@jw1731 I put in the flag Emoji haha. Kinman and Matsu certainly play an important role in Taiwan strait politics. There has been a time during the Cold War when the US asked Chiang to withdraw troops from Kinman and Matsu. But obviously, that never happened. The reason being, if ROC troops withdraw from these two places, ROC would completely lose legitimacy over mainland China. And from the PRC's point of view, having the government that runs Taiwan to have holdings that belong to a Chinese mainland province ties Taiwan to China (as opposed to independence). And that was the consensus during the Cold War.
@tylerzeng6692
@tylerzeng6692 3 жыл бұрын
@@ML-kj3fr 这是历史进程衍生出来的结果。同时说明台湾问题的复杂性。这个不是形容谁是哪家的动物就可以解释的....
@k.umquat8604
@k.umquat8604 2 жыл бұрын
@@ML-kj3fr Then why did they even bring a PRC flag? How does that make Tsai Ing-wen a Japanese dog in the first place? (I ran your comment thru Google translate)
@sadia9061
@sadia9061 3 жыл бұрын
this video was so helpful!! thank you so much, I loved it.
@ekin4260
@ekin4260 4 жыл бұрын
Very well made video! I don't mean to tell you how to do your job, but from the very beginning I was waiting for the "why" of it. Maybe explaining why before going into the details could be a better idea. Anyway, subscribed and excited to see more content from you!
@PoliticswithPaint
@PoliticswithPaint 4 жыл бұрын
Yeah I can see your point, the why part is the most interesting after-all. Thanks for the criticism!
@ekin4260
@ekin4260 4 жыл бұрын
@@PoliticswithPaint Oh no, I didn't mean that, the whole of it was very interesting. It's just that hearing about all the tensions rising over a piece of rock in the sea I constantly said, "Yeah but why? Was there oil in the vicinity?" I think it might have been easier to put the actions of both parties into context if we knew their motivations. Anyway, thanks for being so nice about it!
@wangyingsen458
@wangyingsen458 3 жыл бұрын
@@PoliticswithPaint Ryukyu was not a independent Kingdom it was a subject kingdom of China since Ming Dynasty Just like Korea. And Since then Diaoyu Island always be apart of Taiwan in China's administrative divisions. Japan colony Ruykyu and Taiwan at the same time. During Japan's colony time they also remained the same administrative divisions. But after the WW2. Taiwan should be given back to China(after 50 years colony The native Ryukyu people already be minority in Ryukyu) then Japan play this trick claimed Ryukyu has the Diaoyu isalnd....
@djangounchained9387
@djangounchained9387 3 жыл бұрын
@@wangyingsen458 10cent member spotted
@felixb6
@felixb6 2 жыл бұрын
@@wangyingsen458 Ask a native Ryukyuan about whether they feel more Chinese or Japanese and come back here
@aussiesang5307
@aussiesang5307 3 жыл бұрын
This helped my project so much man, Thank You VERY much!
@shitzuation
@shitzuation 4 жыл бұрын
Wow so much more complicated than I’d realized!! Thanks for the brilliant vid!
@marcnassif2822
@marcnassif2822 4 жыл бұрын
Real shame you don't have nearly as many viewers as you deserve But I'm certain your future is bright! :)
@wangyingsen458
@wangyingsen458 3 жыл бұрын
This uploader is biased Ryukyu was not a independent Kingdom it was a subject kingdom of China since Ming Dynasty Just like Korea. And Since then Diaoyu Island always be apart of Taiwan in China's administrative divisions. Japan colony Ruykyu and Taiwan at the same time. During Japan's colony time they also remained the same administrative divisions. But after the WW2. Taiwan should be given back to China(after 50 years colony The native Ryukyu people already be minority in Ryukyu) then Japan play this trick claimed Ryukyu has the Diaoyu isalnd....
@lightningbolt4419
@lightningbolt4419 3 жыл бұрын
@@wangyingsen458 what about North Korea? 🇦🇴🇦🇴🇦🇴🇦🇴🇦🇴🇦🇴🇦🇴🏴‍☠️🏴‍☠️🏴‍☠️🏴‍☠️🇻🇪🏳️🏴‍☠️🇩🇪🇩🇪🇩🇪🇩🇪🏴‍☠️🏳️🇸🇦👌🇹🇼🇺🇸🇸🇦🇺🇸🇬🇧🇰🇵🇹🇼👌👌👌👌👌👌🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇰🇵🇸🇦🇸🇦🇺🇸🇰🇵🇺🇸🇰🇵🇺🇸🇸🇦🇺🇸🇮🇱🇦🇪🇸🇦🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸🏳️🇩🇪🇹🇹🇦🇪🇷🇺🇦🇺🇹🇹🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺🇦🇴🇨🇳🇦🇴🇦🇴🇷🇸🇨🇳🇦🇴🇨🇳🙋‍♂️🤫🙌🖐🤕🖐🤫🙌🙋‍♀️🤫
@JohnSmith-nz1vj
@JohnSmith-nz1vj 4 жыл бұрын
Wonderful vid. Audio too quiet but otherwise awesome.
@dylancool
@dylancool 2 жыл бұрын
Turn your volume up
@mrbyzantine0528
@mrbyzantine0528 2 жыл бұрын
@@dylancool I did, then he got even quieter!
@savereyy8177
@savereyy8177 2 жыл бұрын
@@mrbyzantine0528 how does that work?
@manleyaccmanley617
@manleyaccmanley617 2 жыл бұрын
@@dylancool ratio (me and the guy agrees on him being too silent) i win
@deanliu2982
@deanliu2982 3 жыл бұрын
A fairly unbiased summary of the issue. Good job!
@jxxxxx44
@jxxxxx44 10 ай бұрын
You support the CCP, don't you?
@eamon821
@eamon821 3 жыл бұрын
I just found your channel and your content is great!
@HenryElfin
@HenryElfin 3 жыл бұрын
Simple and funny drawing plus unbiased, well researched and serious content is a really good match. You deserve a lot more sub with this high quality content!
@nou6150
@nou6150 4 жыл бұрын
Awesome video!!!!
@Matt-rr9bk
@Matt-rr9bk 3 жыл бұрын
Loving the style. Great video on the topic also
@forjw2google135
@forjw2google135 3 жыл бұрын
another great video, just good info/analysis no politics 👍👍👍👍👍
@non_religious
@non_religious 3 жыл бұрын
This channel is very underrated.Hope it will be more popular.Best of luck 🤞
@whatifrealhist992
@whatifrealhist992 11 ай бұрын
Very good video with simple, understandable explanations on a complex issue
@roberteischen4170
@roberteischen4170 3 жыл бұрын
It's nice to see the situation explained impartially. That's quite rare, especially for hotly contested stuff like this.
@jamisonmaguire4398
@jamisonmaguire4398 2 жыл бұрын
How do you "impartially" discuss the seizure of all the islands in the South China Sea by war mongering communists stealing the resources of a half dozen nations and daring them to go to war over it?
@historyrepeat402
@historyrepeat402 2 жыл бұрын
@@jamisonmaguire4398 by not just assuming we are the first humans to ever exist on the planet and understand that history has always effected and will always effect the way the world works.
@jamisonmaguire4398
@jamisonmaguire4398 2 жыл бұрын
@@historyrepeat402 LOL Now that is funny.
@user-xp8hh1hx3q
@user-xp8hh1hx3q 2 жыл бұрын
@@jamisonmaguire4398 When China discovered the South China Sea Islands, the countries around China were still primitive tribes. Do you understand on a first-come-first-served basis?
@jamisonmaguire4398
@jamisonmaguire4398 2 жыл бұрын
@@user-xp8hh1hx3q LOL When was that in the 14th century. You are definitely delusional or a shill of the communist party.
@TomKellyXY
@TomKellyXY 3 жыл бұрын
I live in Japan so I find this fascinating as well as Japan’s disputed islands with Korea and Russia. While there is an impasse now as neither side will give up their claim, part of the issue seems to be that the US didn’t care about these when defining “home islands” that Japan could keep control over in 1945.
@johnl.7754
@johnl.7754 3 жыл бұрын
@lee Yuri People like to say US should not interfere but forget when it was beneficial for them when US did interfere like prior to WW2 in helping China and other countries by stopping trade with Japan.
@deadby15
@deadby15 3 жыл бұрын
Personally, I am way less interested in the Senkaku/Diaoyu and Takejima/Dodko. When I read both arguments, both seem to have at least SOME points. However, some Kuril Islands are so clearly part of Japan historically and geographically. The treaty of SF says Japan keeps all islands that it didn’t acquire thru invasion/ colonization. Now, if Ainu or Giliyaki formed a new nation and claimed the territory, I’d be very sympathetic, but IMO Russia should have no claim at all.
@TomKellyXY
@TomKellyXY 3 жыл бұрын
@@deadby15 The Senkaku/Diaoyu and Takejima/Dodko are worth following not because of the merits of claims by either side but because of the stakes. What may have seemed a minor detail to western powers, could lead to conflict if not resolved. The Kuril Islands (and Ryukyus) were arguably also annexed by invasions. As a New Zealander I'm very aware of indigenous land claims and how often they're overlooked. The issue is what were Japan's borders before this? Japan agreed to relinquish claims to lands gained from wars with China and Russia pre-dating WW2. Borders were not well-defined that long ago. The Japanese territory dispute with Russia is a claim that 4 islands were not part of the Kuril islands and we always part of Ezo/Hokkaido. Museums in Sapporo still depict these are part of Hokkaido prefecture and Japanese citizens are asked not to go there as showing a passport to Russian authorities would be seen a giving legitimacy to Russian claims. However, in all 3 disputes there does not seem to be obvious resolution as it would political suicide for either side to give up their claim without a massive deal in return.
@user-ie9lm4lp4k
@user-ie9lm4lp4k 3 жыл бұрын
When Americans leave this place, they will create problems in this place. This will help the United States to control or destroy these countries in the future. The Diaoyu Islands is a problem deliberately created by the United States.
@user-ie9lm4lp4k
@user-ie9lm4lp4k 3 жыл бұрын
In fact, the Diaoyu Islands belong to China. When there was no such country as the United States in the world, the Diaoyu Islands were already the territory of China. At that time, Japan worshipped China and learned from China.
@zaneexner1045
@zaneexner1045 3 жыл бұрын
This channel is like a ghetto sam o Nella academy
@tengkualiff
@tengkualiff 3 жыл бұрын
Rip sam
@raptor4840
@raptor4840 3 жыл бұрын
@@tengkualiff he ain't dead he's just focusing on Uni
@ultrascarlet5275
@ultrascarlet5275 3 жыл бұрын
@@raptor4840 so he's dead, good to know
@chupachups901
@chupachups901 3 жыл бұрын
This channel is so UNDERRATED
@72hrs_vermithor
@72hrs_vermithor 2 жыл бұрын
Good video, we will watch your career with great interest!
@matthimcarmen11
@matthimcarmen11 4 жыл бұрын
Love it, Big PP
@jacquestbd3134
@jacquestbd3134 Жыл бұрын
A little bit element to discuss, I think Taiwan Island and Chinese Mainland respectively under control by different regimes since 1950, not 1945. The KMT government recaptured Taiwan Island in 1945 and lost majority of Chinese mainland in 1950.
@thomasjuniardi3559
@thomasjuniardi3559 3 жыл бұрын
You should make another video about current situation, a lot had changed in 2020 that make 2 decades of history less relevant. You point of view is refreshing, very informative as well 🙏
@dheerajb1883
@dheerajb1883 3 жыл бұрын
What happened
@linkfromzelda1002
@linkfromzelda1002 3 жыл бұрын
I, too would like to know.
@taiwan6691
@taiwan6691 3 жыл бұрын
@@dheerajb1883 JP will fire if China step on that island and USA Will fight for JP.
@walterwayne3081
@walterwayne3081 2 жыл бұрын
@@taiwan6691 unlikely the USA cannot be trusted and Ukraine has proven it.
@jthehugenuts2229
@jthehugenuts2229 Жыл бұрын
@@taiwan6691 i doubt JP got that dare to, their basicly watching CN&RU plane and ship go around their home everday, and did nothing but take some nice photo......
@victorbmadslund
@victorbmadslund 2 жыл бұрын
Very good explanation
@N3Wk1d5
@N3Wk1d5 3 жыл бұрын
So heart warming to see China and Taiwan be on the same side and working together
@lolasdm6959
@lolasdm6959 2 жыл бұрын
happens more than you think, Taiwan lifted the blockade on the mainland for the mainland navy to go on a skirmish against South Vietnam
@Quasi-Zenith_Satellite_System
@Quasi-Zenith_Satellite_System 8 ай бұрын
めちゃくちゃ公平な解説で感激ですわ!! 私自身日本人ですがDiaoyu/Senkaku問題がこれほどスケールが大きい話だとは知りませんでした。東アジアはこれからもっと加熱していくでしょうから、海外の学生さんも研究対象にどうですか?(唐突な勧誘) I'm very impressed by your very impartial commentary!🥰 I am Japanese myself, but I didn't know that the Diaoyu/Senkaku issue was such a large scale and interesting story. East Asia is going to heat up even more in the future, so foreign students, why don't you make it a subject of your research? 😁
@kkbmmalinaukaltara5786
@kkbmmalinaukaltara5786 2 ай бұрын
Diaoyudao Islands China ❤❤❤
@Quasi-Zenith_Satellite_System
@Quasi-Zenith_Satellite_System 2 ай бұрын
中国ではそういうことになっているんですね!@@kkbmmalinaukaltara5786
@tvgerbil1984
@tvgerbil1984 3 жыл бұрын
Japan also has disputes with South Korea and Russia over some islands too. So every country in the area has some kind of disputes with someone else. That is the norm in the region.
@mikan________ta
@mikan________ta 3 жыл бұрын
That’s right. The term is still used. I'm fourteen years old Japanese, but we are praying that the world will have. JAPAN🤝WORLD 🇯🇵🤝🇺🇸 (Sorry for my bad English.)
@Yae-Miko216
@Yae-Miko216 3 жыл бұрын
@@mikan________ta 🇯🇵🇺🇸 are two evils on the Earth
@user-mh4kh4tm9u
@user-mh4kh4tm9u 3 жыл бұрын
But there's no land disputes between China and Russia now.
@potatonoodlebear8035
@potatonoodlebear8035 3 жыл бұрын
@@user-mh4kh4tm9u Well, when you have shared interest, some tradeoff seems natural
@tuankhangcaonguyen5545
@tuankhangcaonguyen5545 2 жыл бұрын
@@mikan________ta lol praying that Japan will be the testing zone for another nuclear strike
@morrischen5777
@morrischen5777 3 жыл бұрын
Well, it's a little bit late to mention, 2:42, PRC didn't in charge of China at 1945, ROC(now Taiwan) did. PRC was fund in 1949.
@hao8623
@hao8623 3 жыл бұрын
bad grammar alert
@gaafailok3719
@gaafailok3719 3 жыл бұрын
You mean “ROC claimed the island and Japanese had no opposition and were sent to those island with US war ship and were returned forcefully by America and PRC wasn’t founded yet until 1949 after the internal war ROC was push into Taiwan “
@arthurwang4208
@arthurwang4208 3 жыл бұрын
Also, it's not precise to call Taipei government Taiwan - the government name is called ROC. ROC government right now controls Taiwan and a few islands of Fujian.
@beandiesel974
@beandiesel974 3 жыл бұрын
@@hao8623 That just means he knows another language and is trying to learn another
@TrueSkinLab
@TrueSkinLab 3 жыл бұрын
I think the author put chinese flag there to not confuse people, it is not about who rules the country at that time. The chinese flag simply doesn't reflect the political party but the country itself.
@dsdw-qz4gc
@dsdw-qz4gc 11 ай бұрын
讲的非常中立,谢谢你的解说。
@lepnoxicray7398
@lepnoxicray7398 2 жыл бұрын
Well made video but I was on my laptop speakers and couldn't hear anything. It would be nice if the audio would have more volume.
@georgedeng8646
@georgedeng8646 2 жыл бұрын
Me heading into the comment section: I'm feeling brave today. Me in the comment section: not as bad as I expected.
@happyliferay
@happyliferay 3 жыл бұрын
I watched all your China related video from Hong Kong
@nobeer9785
@nobeer9785 Жыл бұрын
Interesting way to see(neither like nor hate) Thanks for sharing your view
@kelt6330
@kelt6330 2 жыл бұрын
Bro u r seriously underrated
@lvhao5105
@lvhao5105 11 ай бұрын
Good content
@Jokkkkke
@Jokkkkke 4 жыл бұрын
Where's that accent from?
@sweetdaddy9275
@sweetdaddy9275 4 жыл бұрын
My guess would be Central European Germany maybe
@stoggafllik
@stoggafllik 3 жыл бұрын
@Schicksal Schicksal “ghast feelds”
@EZPZMAGA
@EZPZMAGA 2 жыл бұрын
Volume too soft (headphones recommended). Otherwise, great content!👍
@Natsumithegreat
@Natsumithegreat 3 жыл бұрын
The US should have kept them. They have oil, which means they are definitely US territory.
@dduay
@dduay 3 жыл бұрын
If I stand inside my kitchen am I in US?
@zhililai3801
@zhililai3801 3 жыл бұрын
@@dduay If you sit on your toilet you are definitely in USA.
@Sammerd
@Sammerd 4 ай бұрын
When will the border disputes between Japan and China be covered? Would love to know more about that!!
@GoldenArrow297
@GoldenArrow297 4 жыл бұрын
Please make some video on Indo China conflict.
@PoliticswithPaint
@PoliticswithPaint 4 жыл бұрын
I plan to make a video covering the issue in the near future :)
@tomaschanth9755
@tomaschanth9755 3 жыл бұрын
Indo Pakistan conflict too
@tenki_desu
@tenki_desu 3 жыл бұрын
Ryukyu sounds like a tasty name
@jie1379
@jie1379 3 жыл бұрын
Pretty much what happened. Unfortunately, most ppls just don't realize that.
@randoviral8113
@randoviral8113 2 жыл бұрын
Great graphix just the audio
@raidarlasala1405
@raidarlasala1405 3 жыл бұрын
Great vid but the audio is too low. Im at full volume
@KWang_12
@KWang_12 3 жыл бұрын
1:16 One China policy is widely acknowledged and respected by the international community and governments. It’s one of the foundations for establishing official diplomatic relations with the People’s Republic of China(PRC). So yes, the One China policy is supported by your country (the US, Germany, France, the list goes on). The Republic of China(ROC, Taiwan) is not recognized as a country in the UN. And it has no representatives in international organizations (cause it ain’t a nation). Don’t try to make it like PRC is making an ostentatious claim not supported by anyone but herself. And btw, the PRC and ROC are still in a civil war. So don’t be surprised when PRC decided to send troops to Taiwan province when they try to declare independence from China.
@KWang_12
@KWang_12 3 жыл бұрын
Technically, the two sides have been in almost a century-long civil war. Reunification was actively sought after by both sides back in the 80s to 90s. But was eventually suspended due to foreign interests from Japan and the US.
@shazzatulanam6680
@shazzatulanam6680 3 жыл бұрын
Most of the developed countries two times both proc and roc.only the poor countries who are on chinese money support proc chinas claim.
@KWang_12
@KWang_12 3 жыл бұрын
@@shazzatulanam6680 You need to get your facts checked. Taiwan only has 14 official diplomatic relations. Almost all of them are (hate to say this) poor countries that are on Taiwan's money. Taiwan's local regime has been pumping money into countries like Palau to maintain official diplomatic relations. They even admitted doing it themselves: news.ltn.com.tw/news/politics/breakingnews/1923578 This news article is published by a local newspaper from the Taiwan province. It's in Chinese but you can translate it with translators easily. I'm just going to quote a sentence translated by google translator: -- Begin quote -- Officials of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs confirmed this and revealed that Sao Tome and Principe and The main reason for Taiwan's severance of diplomatic ties was that the Holy Kingdom asked our lions for financial aid. After being rejected, they broke off diplomatic relations with me and established diplomatic relations with China instead! -- End quote --- The automated translation is not very clear. The article basically said: The ROC's "MOFA" confirmed that they decided to break diplomatic ties with the Democratic Republic of Sao Tome and Principe after the latter requested a 200 million USD aid from Taiwan. The minister of "MOFA" Dawei Li admitted that the reason behind cutting the relationship was because ROC can no longer sustain the "money diplomacy" relation they had with the aforementioned country. See? Almost a perfect contradiction to what you said.
@KWang_12
@KWang_12 3 жыл бұрын
@ry睿 www.fmprc.gov.cn/ce/ceno/eng/ztxw/twwt/t110655.htm ---- Begin quote ---- In October 1971, the United Nations General Assembly adopted at its 26th session Resolution 2758, which expelled the representatives of the Taiwan authorities and restored the seat and all the lawful rights of the government of the PRC in the United Nations. In September 1972, China and Japan signed a Joint Statement, announcing establishment of diplomatic relations between the two countries, and that Japan recognizes the government of the PRC as the only legitimate government of China, fully understands and respects the Chinese government's position that Taiwan is an inalienable part of the territory of the PRC, and promises to adhere to the position as prescribed in Article 8 of the Potsdam Proclamation. In December 1978, China and the U.S. issued the Joint Communique on the establishment of diplomatic relations, in which the U.S. " recognizes the government of the People's Republic of China as the sole legal government of China" and "acknowledges the Chinese position that there is but one China and Taiwan is a part of China. " Up to now, 161 countries have established diplomatic relations with the PRC; they all acknowledge the One-China Principle and promise to handle their relations with Taiwan within the one-China framework. --- end quote ---
@KWang_12
@KWang_12 3 жыл бұрын
​@ry睿 www.state.gov/u-s-relations-with-taiwan/ --- Begin quote --- the United States recognized the Government of the People’s Republic of China as the sole legal government of China, acknowledging the Chinese position that there is but one China and Taiwan is part of China.........The United States does not support Taiwan independence. --- End quote ---
@leungpaul9401
@leungpaul9401 3 жыл бұрын
People keep forgot Taiwan 's proper name is Republic of China. So for both side of China : Taiwan, province of China. Also failed to mention Okinawa local are seeking independent from Japan, Japan have to appointed governor from Japan to rule Okinawa
@youtubedeletedmyaccountlma2263
@youtubedeletedmyaccountlma2263 3 жыл бұрын
Taiwan proper name is neither. The aboriginal never really unite Taiwan.
@zyz8423
@zyz8423 3 жыл бұрын
@ry睿 那怎么还不赶紧把青天白日旗换了?中华民国跟你有什么关系?😅占着地盘撒泼打滚是吧
@pekodd2518
@pekodd2518 2 жыл бұрын
@ry睿 說真的 我們的官方名稱就是中華民國 臺灣只是大眾對我們的稱呼 沒必要這麼執著
@pekodd2518
@pekodd2518 2 жыл бұрын
@@kenwu3407 你俄爹前幾天把我們列為敵對國家 你怎不說分裂祖國了🖕
@user-nt4ux9iq4t
@user-nt4ux9iq4t Жыл бұрын
@@pekodd2518 无论中华民国也好 中华人民共和国也好 钓鱼岛是都是中国人的领土 划给台湾管辖
@randomlyselected8998
@randomlyselected8998 2 жыл бұрын
Underated channel
@legendarybeast44
@legendarybeast44 4 жыл бұрын
Upgrade a bit, you can be on the top!! Specially the sound, its low.
@vincentbourret9468
@vincentbourret9468 3 жыл бұрын
Just subscribe good job
@rommyjoj326
@rommyjoj326 3 жыл бұрын
0:46 Love how he put the war flags of japan and china
@jw1731
@jw1731 3 жыл бұрын
Yep, they're the naval ensigns of the respective navies. The attention to detail on this channel is highly commendable.
@nimotalkssense
@nimotalkssense 2 жыл бұрын
Wonderful masterpiece.. Couldn't understand the lands over rainbow one was kshmr other Catalonia? Pray any viewer to enlighten
@AR-Z17
@AR-Z17 2 жыл бұрын
China be like, "This land belongs to Taiwan n Taiwan belongs to me."
@GustavoRodriguez-qr5po
@GustavoRodriguez-qr5po 2 жыл бұрын
Taiwan is China It’s like saying the keys belong to Florida and Florida belongs to USA
@AR-Z17
@AR-Z17 2 жыл бұрын
@@GustavoRodriguez-qr5po it's different but it does.
@youknowwho8925
@youknowwho8925 3 жыл бұрын
South China Sea with everyone 🤣 I died
@SelamatArtist
@SelamatArtist 2 жыл бұрын
Well presented but audio very soft.
@ignisilluminati
@ignisilluminati 3 жыл бұрын
South Korea doesn't have issue with the island itself, but the oil fields in the brown region at 10:13 is also claimed partially by South Korea. Currently, the area isn't developed so none are actively claiming the ownership of the oil fields, but it can be another potential source of dispute in the region as the area is now included in the EEZ (naval claim) and ADIZ (sky claim) of all 4 countries along with the US carrier fleet patrolling around here.
@user-mi3ix4qm3z
@user-mi3ix4qm3z 8 ай бұрын
Maybe you are talking about the EEZ that expanded throughout South of Jeju islands, Pacific Ocean. Yes, we call that "제7광구", as I know, not as territorial sovereignty but as international law allowed us to claim economic resources and regions.
@bigusdickus9903
@bigusdickus9903 3 жыл бұрын
Taking a page out of the British border drawing book I see.
@user-mi3ix4qm3z
@user-mi3ix4qm3z 8 ай бұрын
As a Korean, really interesting point. The region is exactly located near Okinawa, where many merchant ships for global trade can pass and China-US power collision can occur. Also, recent days it became more difficult as the natural resources are about These islands. I want to hear the reason why you Chinese/Taiwanese and Japanese call these islands your own island. Could you leave a reply for me? I learned little about Chinese, so you can reply in Chinese too. 我是韩国人,这个领土问题我觉得很有意思。我想听你们日本人和中国人,台湾人的根据为什么这些岛是你们的领土。我会说汉语一点儿,写中文也可以。
@DokdoGirls
@DokdoGirls 7 ай бұрын
尖閣諸島は日本領です。中国は尖閣諸島を自国の領土であると国際司法裁判所に証明しに行かないからだ。
@chinarise
@chinarise 6 ай бұрын
The problem is very simple, the Taiwan Islands belong to China's territory since ancient times, and the Diaoyu Islands are part of the Taiwan Islands. China ceded the Taiwan Islands to Japan, and Japan claimed the Diaoyu Islands as its territory after the defeat. But the matter is not as simple as it seems. The US supports Taiwan's conflict with China and Japan's conflict with China to contain China's development. Therefore, whether it is the South China Sea issue, the Taiwan Strait issue, or the Diaoyu Islands issue, the essence behind it is the United States' containment of China's rise. Whether it is the Eastern Europe incident, the war in Afghanistan, the Gulf War, the war in Ukraine, behind the United States to contain Russia's development. Unfortunately, the Soviet Union was defeated by the United States, and China is emerging as a new challenger. China is challenging the American-led order, just as the United States challenged the British-led order a century ago. In the contest of superpowers, guns are the real justice.
@user-mi3ix4qm3z
@user-mi3ix4qm3z 6 ай бұрын
@@chinarise Thank you
@takeme1916
@takeme1916 4 ай бұрын
@@user-mi3ix4qm3z 영어보다 한국어를 더 잘하므러 한국어로 적습니다. 실제로 일본이 인지하기 전부터 중국과 류큐 왕국(현재의 오키나와)은 尖閣諸島,魚釣島(Senkaku Islands)를 인지하고 있었습니다. 근데 그때 서로나라는 영유권 등을 주장하지 않고 그냥 항해할 때 표시...?뭐 아무튼 랜드마크 로서 쓰고 있을 뿐이었다. 그리고 1895녕에 일본 정부는 각 나라에 확인과 동의를 받고, 어느 나라도 영유하고 있지 않다는 걸 확인한 후에 일본의 것으로 했습니다.그리고 일본인이 사업을 위해 살기 시작해 248명이나 되는 사람이 살았습니다. (당시의 사진도 존재함) 이렇게 해서 일본은 그 섬의 선점권원?의 조건을 클리어했다. 이러한 점유를 인정하는 중국의 문서도 현존하고 있습니다. 아마...이 영토 문제가 발생하기 전에 일어난 일에 대한 일본의 주장을 아주 간단히 설명하면 이런 느낌이에요.아마도....ㅋㅋ 어색한 한국어라서 미안해요~
@user-mi3ix4qm3z
@user-mi3ix4qm3z 4 ай бұрын
@@takeme1916 감사합니다
@arthurwang4208
@arthurwang4208 3 жыл бұрын
It's not precise to call Taipei government Taiwan - the government name is called ROC - by its constitution and also its passport. ROC government right now controls Taiwan and a few islands of Fujian.
@haruzanfuucha
@haruzanfuucha Жыл бұрын
@ry睿 Kinmen and Matsu are not Taiwanese. Signed a Kinmenese.
@maxmy2007
@maxmy2007 Жыл бұрын
@ry睿 nope
@user-dx9ki4uv5o
@user-dx9ki4uv5o Жыл бұрын
@ry睿 少TM挂民国旗,别恶心中国
@kangding
@kangding Жыл бұрын
haha
@oskarngo9138
@oskarngo9138 Жыл бұрын
Just Make All Disputed territory into “Wild-Life-ONLY” territory with No people..!
@appa609
@appa609 4 жыл бұрын
They're not completely uninhabitable. If a few people from any one of these parties were to go there and build a house that would create a pretty indisputable claim wouldn't it?
@PoliticswithPaint
@PoliticswithPaint 4 жыл бұрын
In legal terms not necessarily. They need to be able to sustain human habitation, however the Islands lack basic resources such as a fresh water source which are needed for that purpose. Even if people were to set up permanent houses there, they would be entirely reliant on water, food and anything else from elsewhere. That makes it difficult for the Islands to be recognised as actual Islands in International law. However this hasn’t prevented nations from utilising buildings to strengthen their claim, China does so in the South China Sea and South Korea has done so on the Takeshima/Dokdo Islands.
@appa609
@appa609 4 жыл бұрын
Politics with Paint I mean it's expensive for a house but I'm sure a national government can provide a solar still, greenhouse, a fishing boat and other such tools for their pioneers right? I mean we're currently planning for sustainable colonies on the moon and mars how hard can it be to get one on an earth island?
@kekeke1201
@kekeke1201 3 жыл бұрын
@@appa609 There are ships of all sides swiming around there 247 just to prevent what u were suggesting. U saw news of Japanese navy ramping fishing ships? Because they fear pioneers disgised as fisher man and set up settlement there. Plus I don't know about Japan, since they are passing a lot of provoking resolutions lately, but China seems to want to avoid escalating too much on this measure. And just as in many other things, China dislikes its people doing too patriartical actions that disrup its own foreign policy.
@bluenosedfish3839
@bluenosedfish3839 3 жыл бұрын
destroy the rock before it destroys us all!
@heretohear1847
@heretohear1847 3 жыл бұрын
comment for the algorithm
@kalinka4482
@kalinka4482 3 жыл бұрын
you should try using music in these videos
@cagykoala6004
@cagykoala6004 11 ай бұрын
A legend was born
@annagagliardi2046
@annagagliardi2046 3 жыл бұрын
Interesting but can hardly hear the talking.
@SatyaJanta
@SatyaJanta 3 жыл бұрын
Very Low Audi⭕⭕⭕⭕ but video is fine!!!
@shonenjumpmagneto
@shonenjumpmagneto 2 жыл бұрын
4:07 - incomplete map of The Japanese Empire. The Kuril Islands should've been red+white or light red color coded.
@YJSP893
@YJSP893 4 жыл бұрын
Btw, Taiwan call itself as "Republic of China". And there is no doubt this island belongs to Taiwan.
@BBarNavi
@BBarNavi 3 жыл бұрын
We honestly don't give a shit
@YJSP893
@YJSP893 3 жыл бұрын
BARRR so just don't comment
@zhiqianwen
@zhiqianwen 3 жыл бұрын
牛🐮啊看到这头像我立马就笑了
@Sunnyboy0926
@Sunnyboy0926 9 ай бұрын
@@zhiqianwen 🤣Can you speak English?😊🤣
@darkcookie5158
@darkcookie5158 3 жыл бұрын
I am writing a paper and you just saved my life. But i was wondering if anyone knows the sources? Bc if i want to use the info from this video i need to confirm that this is a serious source bc iT´s YoUtUbE tHaTs ThE iNtErNeT tHiS hAs To Be BuLl
@darkcookie5158
@darkcookie5158 3 жыл бұрын
and yes i am aware that there are articles in the video
@PoliticswithPaint
@PoliticswithPaint 3 жыл бұрын
Glad I was of help! Looks like I forgot to add my sources, I'll do that tomorrow.
@shrinilodedra3001
@shrinilodedra3001 3 жыл бұрын
Focus on south east Asia?
@kng5451
@kng5451 2 жыл бұрын
the point here is not really just the resources of the island, but the 12 nautical miles or 22 kilometers of territory (including military's) rights who owns the island. If China officially owns it, it can setup military bases North of Taiwan, South of Japan and Korea and potentially keep US pacific naval forces 350km out from it coast line. It is so strategic for China and Japan / US will not want it to go to China. 2 cents
@sun.1921
@sun.1921 10 ай бұрын
中肯的
@deanzaZZR
@deanzaZZR Жыл бұрын
As an outside observer (mostly, American here), I think Japan was very fortunate to retain all of the Okinawan Islands all the way down south nearly to Taiwan. Waging such an aggressive war and losing usually results in some consequences. Senkaku/Diaoyu is not part of Okinawa. In a fair world China/Taiwan would get them.
@xuepingsong5329
@xuepingsong5329 Жыл бұрын
There were also many war criminals in Unit 731 that got away completely free, yep not a single charge, they constructed and used biological weapons that likely killed at least hundreds of thousands to say the least of their crimes against humanity. One them became mayor of post war Toyko and another founded what is one of Japan's biggest pharmaceutical companies today. Compared to the Germans, Japan's atrocities are rarely talked about just like the soviets in their counter offensive against the German civilians. They then had a great economic boom and even kept their emperor! so yea they were pretty fortunate. Also japan was lucky that it wasn't split like germany.
@realllllllycool
@realllllllycool 11 ай бұрын
@@xuepingsong5329 yep us Americans were too scared they would go commie if we slapped them too hard
@tiefblau2780
@tiefblau2780 2 жыл бұрын
How does claiming what is your property count as mending ties? Oh ohh I know this one... by giving you Free Cash... Right Right got it... NO!
@simpmaster7995
@simpmaster7995 Жыл бұрын
684 comments but only 5 can be seen.I wonder what is happening.
@ryankline1164
@ryankline1164 Жыл бұрын
Regardless of who they belong to, they are part of the first island chain which is of great strategic value for any potential invasion of Taiwan, which Japan would almost certainly be drawn into. Tbh, I doubt Taiwan wants them at this point in history. It would just be another island they'd have to defend, and they already have too many of them. Maybe after China recognizes Taiwan's independence (ha).
@user-qw5oj3bc8i
@user-qw5oj3bc8i Жыл бұрын
可惜台湾不可能独立
@Quasi-Zenith_Satellite_System
@Quasi-Zenith_Satellite_System 8 ай бұрын
台灣可独立「台湾」不「中華民国」。不要一国二政府。唯二政府在而已。 我偽中国語好😎
@jianwen5760321
@jianwen5760321 3 жыл бұрын
Difficult international law issue? Trial by combat then:)
@ALWH1314
@ALWH1314 3 жыл бұрын
It’s all about economic zone. The island is just a piece of no life rock but allows Japan to declare a large economic zone to fish. Historically the island was a part of Taiwan’s Pin-Don (屏東縣)county its only 140 miles north east of Taiwan (much far away from Japan) and got colonized by Japan along with Taiwan in 1900. 1943 US, UK, Russia and China signed Cairo Declaration and agreed Taiwan returning to China after WW2 which includes this island by default. However, US transferred the ownership to a private Japanese in 1970 without Taiwan’s consent. Then this Japanese gave the island to Japanese government so Japan can declare economic zone which means Taiwanese fishing boats will enter Japanese territory as soon as the boats leave ports. Protest in Taiwan started in 70s, I remember because I participated. China didn’t get involved till recent year the pro Japan taiwan government stopped claiming the island. Chinese coast guard filled the missing Taiwanese coast guard to protect Chinese and Taiwanese fishing boats in the region against Japanese coast guards and navy. Chinese position is this island a part of Taiwan and Taiwan is a part of China, hence Chinese has the duty to confront Japan and US to protect Chinese sovereignty. Japan did the same thing to another smaller rock east of taiwan, claiming it’s an island and arrests Taiwanese fishing boats. The pathetic Taiwanese government keeps silent on the matter and China is not engaged.
@gregorjerman973
@gregorjerman973 3 жыл бұрын
You'd be surprised that WW3 will end or maybe erase those Islands claimed both the PRC and the ROC for sure.
@SCHANG-fp1xv
@SCHANG-fp1xv Жыл бұрын
Wrong fact. The island is considered to be part of Yilan County, Taiwan. Pintung is the southernmost county of mainland Taiwan and is perhaps the farthest mainland Taiwan county (aside from the Taiwanese Spratly territories under Kaohsiung County's rule) from the Tiaoyu-Tai/Senkaku island. The only reason that Taiwan has remained relatively cautious is because of Chinese threat and China's potential invasion. Only when Taiwan regains its full statehood can it protests its territorial disputes with one of its closest allies strongly and openly.
@darkenwong5040
@darkenwong5040 Жыл бұрын
@@SCHANG-fp1xv 有那個實力嗎?
@user-qw5oj3bc8i
@user-qw5oj3bc8i Жыл бұрын
怎么都觉得台湾会独立笑死😂
@xuepingsong5329
@xuepingsong5329 Жыл бұрын
@@gregorjerman973 Nukes are overrated for their environmental damage. Its mostly being poisonous. Go watch the Us conducting tests of nukes on old battleships, basically no effect.
@villiamkarl-gustavlundberg5422
@villiamkarl-gustavlundberg5422 3 жыл бұрын
I wonder if the island will survive world war 3. You never know somebody might blow it up.
@crodsbye
@crodsbye 3 жыл бұрын
*USA sweats profusely*
@villiamkarl-gustavlundberg5422
@villiamkarl-gustavlundberg5422 3 жыл бұрын
Ha ha 😁
@gregorjerman973
@gregorjerman973 3 жыл бұрын
I'm sure China would target Guam Japan and Sokor Taiwan with more than that small rock. US for sure will blow China big time.
@perry6660
@perry6660 2 жыл бұрын
@@gregorjerman973 and China won’t blow the US as a response? Don’t be too full of yourself.
@fabianwee
@fabianwee 3 жыл бұрын
We need a stronger UN . A flimsy UN is bad for humanity.
@sagee5424
@sagee5424 3 жыл бұрын
I feel bad for taiwan, taiwan is smaller than china and japan, smaller population than China or Japan, smaller active military than China or japan, smaller economy than China or Japan, and cannot complete 2 titans of east asia.
@sagee5424
@sagee5424 3 жыл бұрын
that is sad
@xiaohexiaoheyang3389
@xiaohexiaoheyang3389 3 жыл бұрын
Think about it another way,If china doesn’t help Taiwan, the island will be Japan’s
@xiaohexiaoheyang3389
@xiaohexiaoheyang3389 3 жыл бұрын
For u does Taiwan belong to China that is not important
@typiclyjohny5114
@typiclyjohny5114 3 жыл бұрын
@@corndog7905 Taiwan also thinks Taiwan belongs to China
@kinewe1161
@kinewe1161 3 жыл бұрын
@@xiaohexiaoheyang3389 In fact, Taiwan can do nothing in the face of Japan. The Chinese mainland maritime police boat has regularly patrolled Diaoyu Island.
@happy-smile2525
@happy-smile2525 3 ай бұрын
私、日本人 私達にとってこの問題は中国、台湾のちょっとした欲望によるものではないかと考えています。 事実、昔の尖閣諸島にて、中国の漁師が漂流してきたので、まだその島々にいた漁師の日本人が助け、送り返し、中国政府から感謝状が出されています。 ”大日本帝国さんありがとね、尖閣諸島は貴方方のものやで、そして助けてくれた漁師達に謝謝”なんていう物が出ています。 が、ちょっと前に国連が尖閣諸島の地下にサウジアラビアにも匹敵する石油が眠っているという報告が出た後に台湾や中国は領有権を主張してきました。 最近は台湾有事が恐れられている中、一緒に盗られるのではないかと思っています。 日本政府も中国政府も早くICJに出て、反論できなくさせればいいのに、それをしないのには疑問が生じます。 中国を信用していないのでしょうか?
@Anonymous_world5000
@Anonymous_world5000 Ай бұрын
I completely support Japan. The Senkaku islands are 100% Japanese territory. 🇯🇵👍😊
@Ss-jn6mm
@Ss-jn6mm 2 жыл бұрын
Make vedio on israel -iran and iran -america disputes.
@snaiper195
@snaiper195 3 жыл бұрын
Why 1945 china is represented whit prc flag
@MrTrinitius
@MrTrinitius 2 жыл бұрын
So why did the US unilaterally give administrative rights of the islands to Japan in 1951? Was it their islands to give the rights to Japan in the first place? The motivations and validity of that decision during the McCarthy period is the elephant in the room that nobody talks about.
@LoC28C
@LoC28C Жыл бұрын
This is a very pertinent question. You see most of the conflicts around the world currently are caused by the USA. The other party that causes another Huge part of the conflicts are caused by the British, and when the British give their former colonies independence they normally plant a time bomb that will cause disputes in the future.
@colecummings2071
@colecummings2071 3 жыл бұрын
7:38 Poland: I know how it feels to be surrounded by giant countries
@jifa17
@jifa17 3 жыл бұрын
But Taiwan is not a country. Just part of China, they call themselves the Republic of China.
@colecummings2071
@colecummings2071 3 жыл бұрын
Well they are just the remaining people who believe in democracy they fled there in 1949 when they lost the civil war
@chetshu4175
@chetshu4175 3 жыл бұрын
​@@colecummings2071 China's civil war has been suspended not ended. Both sides never sign a truce.
@colecummings2071
@colecummings2071 3 жыл бұрын
True they just fled there and for the rest of history is be allied to usa
@colecummings2071
@colecummings2071 3 жыл бұрын
And if you heard one country two party well it dead for what China done in hongkong
@chetshu4175
@chetshu4175 3 жыл бұрын
1:17 but don't forget the official name of Taiwan: Republic of China
@kittyflier8338
@kittyflier8338 3 жыл бұрын
I prefer the usage of the terminology PRC & ROC over China & Taiwan.
@matthewmann8969
@matthewmann8969 3 жыл бұрын
For a while The Japanese were the big heads
@spartanx9293
@spartanx9293 3 жыл бұрын
Until said heads were deformed by nuclear radiation
@gregorjerman973
@gregorjerman973 3 жыл бұрын
@@spartanx9293 All would share the same fate don't worry about it.
@taiwan6691
@taiwan6691 3 жыл бұрын
@@gregorjerman973 It is yours,Not for me
@liushu2979
@liushu2979 2 жыл бұрын
There is no dispute, it is mine
@543lincar2
@543lincar2 Жыл бұрын
The issue of Taiwan independence is not a Chinese issue. It is not a choice between reunification of China and separation from China. The true color of the issue of Taiwan independence is an unfinished decolonization job. Why decolonization should be applied to Taiwan? First, Taiwan was a Japanese colony since 1895. Because Japan renounced her territorial sovereignty over Taiwan in 1952 without designating the successor, Taiwan became a former colony with undetermined status. Second, because the post-war disposition of Taiwan is still undetermined, the Allied Powers’ post-war military occupation arrangement is still effective. In other words, Taiwan is still a territory under Allied Powers’ military occupation. Finally, according to UNGA Resolution 1514, decolonization should be applied to non- self-governing territories and lands under military occupation is certainly non-self- governing. Hence, decolonization should be applied to Taiwan. The Allied Powers’ military occupation is an operation of All allied members of the world war 2. The Allied Powers as a whole, is the owner of military occupation rights, and members mentioned on the occupation plan General Order No.1, are the actual executors. They are empowered agents of all members of the Allies. The ONE CHINA cage cannot and should not cover the Allied Powers’ military occupation entity and Taiwan. So you may ask, what can I do? Well, if you are a member of legislature in any sovereign state, please spend some time to check related archives and confirm the facts mentioned in this video, stop passing bills or resolutions demanding executive branch to form official diplomatic relation with the ROC regime, stop pushing executive branch to form official diplomatic relation with the ROC regime, and use the facts you have confirmed to ask executive branch, especially the department of foreign affairs, about their position on the status of Taiwan. Please ask the executive branch, especially the department of foreign affairs, about executive branch’s position on Taiwan’s status based on the San Francisco Peace Treaty. If the answer is not clear, request the executive branch to do research. Then pass resolution to request executive branch to support the entity of the Allied Powers’ military occupation to represent people on Taiwan in international organizations as observer, and request executive branch to demand the UN to put Taiwan on the list of non-self-governing territories. If you are a nice person, and you really love Taiwan and its people, please check related archives and confirm the facts. Also, please stop requesting your government to form official diplomatic relation with the ROC regime, but instead, request your government to study the actual situation of Taiwan. To help Taiwan and its people, please stop calling 🇹🇼this the national flag of Taiwan and stop regarding the ROC regime as the Taiwan government. Because this will only put Taiwan and people on Taiwan into the ONE CHINA cage. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/otmjZbKVss7NaWQ.html
@New_Cold_War_Analysis
@New_Cold_War_Analysis Жыл бұрын
De-colonization by Western Allied Powers, first of all, due to their intentional colonialistic action over Taiwan as a territory renounced by Japan which status is still unsettled. It should have been returned to China has it was promised in the Postdam and Cairo declarations, and if it was not done so was because the communists (PRC) had already taken control of most of China except Taiawn. Thus, as a measure to keep control of Taiwan as a tool to counter communism in China, they decided to ignore their previous promises and, instead, exert once again their imperialist domination to play with Chinese territory. We might not forget that at this time the Western Allied Powers were all imperialist, with plenty of colonies all around the world. The San Francisco Peace Treaty was aberrant and legally dubious since it did not count with a very important state entity directly affected by the renounce of Japanese territory: China, who was also an Allied Power, by the way. Neither ROC nor PRC were invited to the treaty and decisions that directly affected them were taken without counting with their voice. That is not the way peace treaties are supposed to work under international law. But it did not matter because, anyway, it was the US who dictated when international law was necessary and when not. To begin with, had the SF treaty or the Taiwan treaty of 1952 specified that Japan ceded back Taiwan to ROC, then PRC would have had a legal right to militarily conquer Taiwan, as it would be a part of China's sovereignty territory. To avoid that, they decided to leave it undecided, an imperialist trick for selfish interest that brouth us to the problem we have today in Taiwan. Advocating for the self-determination of Taiwan as you ask is very loable, but unfortunately actions of self-determination only take place in two ways: through war or through consensus with the parent state, which if the status of Taiwan had not been tampered with by Allied Powers in 1952, would be PRC.
@user-qw5oj3bc8i
@user-qw5oj3bc8i Жыл бұрын
漏洞百出😢
@user-mk4ul2dp8o
@user-mk4ul2dp8o 11 ай бұрын
旧金山条约你台湾都没去你再说什么呢?一切请以二战后最基本的波兹坦公告为主😅
@Sunnyboy0926
@Sunnyboy0926 9 ай бұрын
Love you❤
@user-idontknowmyname
@user-idontknowmyname Ай бұрын
The closes thing we ever got from the team work of 🇨🇳🤝🇹🇼
@christineannclerino4008
@christineannclerino4008 9 ай бұрын
Yeah it is owned by China since middle ages and taiwan agrees but in the 1879 annexed by Japan. 😅
@coffeelink943
@coffeelink943 2 жыл бұрын
It’s simple, the island doesn’t belong to anyone
@hetienyi8628
@hetienyi8628 3 ай бұрын
If you don't know, don't try to explain.
@techno22936
@techno22936 Жыл бұрын
I know there are a lot of opinion but, it is also true that there are oils under the island. And china insisted after it discovered. But Japan insisted before it discovered. If the island ruled by Chinese army,it also means the danger of Southeast Asia. And world became Chinese territory.
@FSch.
@FSch. Жыл бұрын
✨✨🎌🎌 J A P A N 🎌🎌✨✨
@byhyew
@byhyew Жыл бұрын
Quite biased against China but better than most Western productions. 1. Taiwan was never de facto independent from China in 1945. In 1945 China took back Taiwan from Japan. If you mean the separate rule of Taiwan and mainland China, that happened in 1949/1950. If you mean when Taiwanese started seeking independence from China then it was the 1990s. 2. Allied agreements on Japan prior to the end of WWII and leading up to the founding of the United Nations limited Japan's legal territory to only the 4 home islands and by this international law/precedent Japan never had any legal claims to Okinawa/Ryukyu, which was placed under UN/US administration, which the US handed over control to Japan later. Rather Okinawa/Ryukyu under which the Diaoyu/Senkaku falls under is a semi-autonomous kingdom administered by Japan seeking independence.
@CloudC-kj6kt
@CloudC-kj6kt 3 жыл бұрын
no bullshit only war can resovlve territory problem
@ConnorTan-sg6jv
@ConnorTan-sg6jv 3 жыл бұрын
Don't really understand why they want this little island
@ddwkc
@ddwkc 3 жыл бұрын
The sea around it is valuable. Also security. These nations are highly dependent on trade, so they are particularly interested in any sea control they can get in that region. The island itself is whatever.
@johnnyhshify
@johnnyhshify 3 жыл бұрын
What accent? Sounds German
South Korea vs Japan: Who owns Dokdo/Takeshima?
18:01
Politics with Paint
Рет қаралды 163 М.
China’s $17 billion plan for a Canal across Europe
10:01
Politics with Paint
Рет қаралды 398 М.
ДЕНЬ РОЖДЕНИЯ БАБУШКИ #shorts
00:19
Паша Осадчий
Рет қаралды 4,2 МЛН
Super sport🤯
00:15
Lexa_Merin
Рет қаралды 20 МЛН
Sigma Girl Education #sigma #viral #comedy
00:16
CRAZY GREAPA
Рет қаралды 71 МЛН
I Need Your Help..
00:33
Stokes Twins
Рет қаралды 135 МЛН
China-India border dispute explained
16:24
Politics with Paint
Рет қаралды 854 М.
Should every state own Nuclear Weapons?
9:01
Politics with Paint
Рет қаралды 116 М.
Are China and Russia Allies?
10:25
Politics with Paint
Рет қаралды 888 М.
Why NATO doesn't protect members everywhere
11:58
Politics with Paint
Рет қаралды 344 М.
Why South Korea wants a tiny piece of Russia
13:09
Politics with Paint
Рет қаралды 390 М.
Feature History - Chinese Civil War
15:22
Feature History
Рет қаралды 2 МЛН
Territorial Disputes in 2023
12:53
General Knowledge
Рет қаралды 260 М.
Why Japan's Lost Decade Is China's Future
12:04
Explained with Dom
Рет қаралды 122 М.
How Chinese & Japanese Cultures Influenced Each Other Through History
13:43
Cool History Bros
Рет қаралды 345 М.
Why China and Vietnam Have Fallen Out
10:09
TLDR News Global
Рет қаралды 355 М.
ДЕНЬ РОЖДЕНИЯ БАБУШКИ #shorts
00:19
Паша Осадчий
Рет қаралды 4,2 МЛН