No he didn’t he just didn’t want to ruin the episode

@@jaythemachine3845 no I don't think so he's been talking about this ever since it happened he keeps talking to his guests about how smart Terrence Howard is

@@TheGiantMidget he's a tard for sure lol

For real! Except for when the homless person says “look up how many companies use my patents” you won’t actually find anything

Its really sad because of how they truly believe thier own ideas. Thier self confidence and charisma is what makes people thisnk thier genious and just over thier heads. When thier not. They took some concepts and mashed them up with a bunch of fantasy using words people might connect with in a logical way.

there’s a lot of crackheads where i live this is exactly the type of shit they scream when they’re walking in the middle of the street 🤦‍♂️

That's because you're thick.

Now we talking down on homeless people ? You having a home don't make you better than them

asdfhdafhadfhadfhadfhadfhadfh hahahahaha

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

For me i go to Chris Delia

"Where is Ja Rule?

When I'm looking for sense and logic I read the KZfaq comments on Chris DuhElia's page.

When Chris Delia looks for sense and logic he bangs a 16 year old

Rogan is no genius but he also doesn't pretend to be one. He has moments where he has made an ass out of himself like everyone on this planet. Why are you all so bent on tearing people down the second they show any flaws?

"I'm a f*cking moron." "I'm not a respected source of information, even for me." "but don’t listen to me, I’m an idiot.” - Joe Rogan. "When someone shows you who they are, believe them." - Maya Angelou

He such an idiot he's worth 100s of millions 😂

​@Valerius123 100% joe is brilliant at what he does. He smart enough to grasp multiple concepts and discuss them. Ask the right sort of questions. Why people like to shit on him is beyond me.

He's not super intelligent or anything, but he's certainly knowledgeable because he likes to learn, he seems to know alot of shit your average Joe would never haha

Yes. Exactly.

I don’t know I thought he had some really interesting points like how we build houses like squares and hurricanes and tornadoes always destroy them. Instead we should build them round and spherical. There was actually an architect hundreds of years ago that was doing that. He never used straight lines in his architecture. I forgot his name. I also like his drones. Also what he said about the plasma rifle in space with water, if that’s true that’s mind blowing. I love how people are so quick to shit on others when they go outside the normal standard of thought we’re used to.

Bro, I found a lot of his shit really interesting and I'm way too stupid to disregard his claims, just pointing out what it sounds like

@@The_Primary_Axiomif a mad man speaks for 3 hours straight there’s a good chance a handful of points will be good.

@@MacLaw3084 Highly doubtful. Also, did you see his VR and AR patent he made? Like he even showed it. Don’t think mad men do that kind of stuff do you? People are calling him names yet they haven’t achieved 10% of what he did.

What is a woman?

Is it a lie tho? 😂

​@@natetechr your mum

Except his brain

I'd rather have pancakes

Accurate

Infinity is just a nicer Nissan

Next you’re gonna tell me lexus and Toyotas are the same thing. Quit fucking with me

@@SyntheticShinobithey aren’t the same. It’s like saying a Volkswagen is a Bugatti

what has he called him out on? what did the guy say to say he's wrong, you think he understood everything he said...lol prove it that he's wrong...o right, you can't

Do you agree with what Terrence is saying?😂​@@donnie9001

There are several videos on YT that address Terrance's bs claims. I suggest watching Sabine Hofstadters

Howard doesn't speak the language of science and when he tries to he loses reality

@@justinoff1what credentials do you have to prove what he’s saying is wrong?

@@centerfield8924 I have a college degree and took organic chemistry and calculus unlike Terrance Howard

@@justinoff1 thats great for you. you studied and got consumed by the established system. your credentials and achievements are unfitting for explaining this man's ideas. Everything is waves. I know that much and I don't see anybody explaining how a particle simulator, using real phyics creates a 1:1 simulated saturn WITHOUT GRAVITY. You are all ver quick to dismiss everything that challenges the established system but none of you have the guts to actually get into it and dispute it or have a conversation with the man. Scared little chicken all of ye.

Especially when one of the people have made up their own language

Yeah, and any person who has a basic understanding of the laws of indices in maths will tell you Terrence is talking through his arse too.

I'm sure everyone will be waiting on your Oxford seminar and multiple patents. Dud!

@@jvadoptante any, and I mean ANY person with even a basic understanding of maths can (and a lot have) debunk Terrence's utter BS about 1x1 = 2 and 1^3 =|pi| (which even goes against what Terrence says himself). By his own stupid, non-sensical rules, 1x1=2 (which is total crap) so 1x1x1 should equal 2x1, which by Terrence's stupid rules would equal 3 (not 3.141592....). Don't get me started on the cube and square root thing; it's been explained before by many other people and I'm not going to humour an ignoramus like you. As for his seminar at Oxford, it was supposed to be about acting, not his crackpot, lunatic word salad ramblings. As for patents, he's probably lying about them (just like his educational history). If not, anyone can take out a patent and it doesn't even have to work. People like you just lap up any dogs**t that celebrities say that go against the status quo without even thinking. You're like braindead cultists.

@@jvadoptante I'm so very sorry that your father was not around in your life. (ask me how I knew.) anyway, do you think.. do you think a patent takes anything except money? You know that you could go apply for a patent on some random shit right now, right? But also, terrence howard has applied for 3 patents and FAILED TO ATTAIN all 3 by failing to even meet the very basic requirements of a patent lol as for the oxford seminar, he got that because he's famous actor terrance howard, not for any of the shit he says lmao if you listened to any of that and walked away thinking "this guy is smart" then your critical thinking skills are utterly nonexistent and that is a deep failure of the education system.

Mate he's talking absolute nonsense, he might be using words that have meaning in some context, but he certainly doesn't understand that context

@@jackbicknell4711how is it nonsense when “Cymatics” is an actual study??? I’m no physicist or anything but I know that everything deals with frequency and resonance, sound etc. TH is opening the floor for conversation, has a number of patents for new tech and is being attacked….. Where have we seen this in history?? 🤔

@@savi9540 If you think terrence is talking sense, you're as deluded as him. The guy is talking nonsense. Absolute hogwash. "Keep dividing light by 2"

No you didn't, there are no "acoustic physics" classes. You're just a liar with a very low IQ....

​@jackbicknell4711 you can most definitely turn color into sound. It's not a new thing. Have a bit of knowledge so that you don't get into arguments that you can't win

wat?

Hope you aren't in support Terrance. Jiddu despised poppycocks and charlatans who led men astray.

It’s just alchemy. Isaac newton was more of an alchemist then he was a scientist

I can mention something sounding like a Graham theory, too. Would you then believe I can talk to my future children threw ball contortion?

@ryanbowen you are a moron

@@BillyDHughesDrums Is "Graham theory" supposed to be a positive thing? I thought this guy was trying to slander Terrence.

We move things with sound all the time. Its not the lost key to becoming telekenetic, its basic science we already know they want to be using differently but can't.

Yes sir. Agreed.

#1, he's making claims that are demonstrably false. For example that 1*1 = 2 or whatever the fuck. We know this is false because we know how multiplication works. 1*1 = 1 (terrence tries to justify his claim on a false assumption, that multiplication means to "add or make more", this is a COMPLETELY separate definition to the mathematical definition of "multiply" Math definition of multiply: "obtain from (a number) another that contains the first number a specified number of times." definition of multiply you guys like to use "(of an animal or other organism) increase in number by reproducing." basically you guys are using the biblical definition of multiply to talk about the math definition of multiply) addition might be more your guys' speed, but think of multiplication, so for example 1*1, as one, one times. 1*2, one, two times, etc. #2 he is chaining together completely unrelated topics and finding patterns in them. This is a very common symptom of schizophrenia/bipolar disorder, it's called "apophenia" now everyone is susceptible to some type of apophenia (Gambler's fallacy is a form of it, as is confirmation bias) but Terrence is at the level of psychotic homeless man outside of walmart rather than guy who really wants to confirm his own bias level. For example the shit he talks about in regard to "dividing by 2," you should be asking yourself "where did he get the number 2? what's the reasoning here? why not 3? why not 100?" Or the shit about the periodic table and certain things being in "the key of E" where did he get the key of E from? Why not D? Why not C? But most importantly, let's say that is true and that if you take the periodic table and divide some.. element's... light.. by 2.. whatever that means or however that's done (it doesn't mean anything) and it ends up in the key of E (That would be E F# G# A B C# D#, and what octave are we talking about here? I get the sense that Terrence is under the impression that each note name has only one hertz number associated with it, that is not true at all. Middle E4 is 329.628 Hz, while E3 is 164.81. Oh and you and Terrence know that these note names being assigned to specific hertz numbers.. are man-made and decided by us right? Typically we use A = 440 Hz, but you can also use an alternate tuning with A = 432 Hz, so which one does carbon match up to, guys? Tuning has also changed throughout history, different cultures have their own musical scales etc etc. These musical things are NOT inherent values set by nature, WE decide them.) I could say to you "If you take 10 (the number of fingers on our hands) and times it by 12 (the number of apostles) then add 3 (for the three wise men) it comes out to 123, first of all that's a special number, 123, for obvious reasons. But what happened in the year 123? Emperor Hadrian averted a war with Parthia by a personal meeting with Osroes I AND Chinese scientist Zhang Heng corrects the calendar to bring it into line with the four seasons, proving that PEACE and ALIGNMENT are innate parts of human nature and dictated by the lord Jesus Christ as well, but modern historians and mathematicians will deny what I'm telling you right now." and your response to that absolutely SHOULD NOT be "wow that is some really profound shit! and it's so true, it MUST be a sign!" your response should be "what the fuck do any of those things have to do with each other? Why are we multiplying the number of fingers on our hands by the 12 apostles and not literally ANYTHING else? Why are we doing 10 * 12 instead of 10 / 12 or 10 + 12? Why are we adding 3 instead of taking 3 or dividing by 3 or multiplying by 3? Also, where does the bible say there were three wise men? (it doesn't, it never specifies the number of the wise men at all)" And the answer to all of these questions is that I pulled all of these things completely out of my ass, just like Terrence Howard routinely does. The human brain is a pattern recognition machine, if you look hard enough ANYWHERE at ANYTHING you WILL spot some kind of pattern eventually. The issue with Terrence Howard types is that he's not actually seeing these patterns, because they aren't there, he is having intense delusions that he's seeing these patterns. And what happened here is that you saw the ravings of a VERY mentally ill man and actually believed the shit because you were too lazy to think, for two or more seconds, about what he was actually saying and WHY it may or may not make sense.

you are easily fooled, clearly...he hasn't worked on anything but his own ego and madness.

He has blueprints and patents, what am I being fooled by, he is not selling anything.

There is no suppressed technology

@@Paul-ew5st All MURDERED RIGHT AFTER CREATING INVENTION 1. STEFAN MARINOV-FREE ENERGY 2. JOHN MULLEN-NUCLEAR PHYSICIST 3. MARK MCCANDLISH- ANTI-GRAVITY PROPULSION 4. DIMITRY PETRONOV -PLASMA BATTERY 5. ZACHARY WARFIELD -PLASMA BATTERY 6. EUGENE MALLOVE- FREE ENERGY DEVICE 7. ARIE DEGEUS -FREE ENERGY-ZERO POINT 8. RORY JOHNSON- COLD FUSION MOTOR 9. MARK TOMION -STAR DRIVE 10. JAMES ALLEN -AEROSPACE ANTIGRAVITY DOCUMENTARY INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES RUNNING ON WATER 1. CHARLES HENRY GARRET - ELECTOLYTIC CARBURETOR 2. ARCHIE BLUE -WATER POWERED CAR 3. DANIEL DINGLE -HYDROGEN REACTOR CAR 4. STANLEY ALLEN MEYER - WATER FUEL CELL 5. BOB BOYCE - ELECTROLYSER 6. STEVE RYAN - 50% WATER 7. PAUL ZIGURAS - HYDROGEN ENGINE 8. FREDDY WELLS -WATER-POWERED ENGINES 9. RYUSHIN OMASA -HYDROGEN-OXYGEN GAS MIXTURE 10. STEAVE EATON -WATER-FUELED ENGINES 11. OLIVER & VALENTIN-WATER-FUELED TECHNOLOGY 12. WALT JENKINS -HYDROGEN & OXYGEN FUEL 1. TOM OGLE - VEHICLE COVER-UP 2. CHARLES NELSON POGUE - VEHICLE COVER-UP 3. TROY REED - VEHICLE COVER-UP ENERGY COVER-UP 1. THOMAS HENRY MORAY - FREE ENERGY 2. JOHN SEARL - FREE ENERGY 3. FLOYD A. SWEET - FREE ENERGY 4. ADAM TROMBLY - FREE ENERGY 5. BRUCE DE PALMA - FREE ENERGY 6. PARAMAHANSA TEWARI - FREE ENERGY CANCER COVER-UP 1. HARRY HOXSEY -CANCER CURE COVER-UP 2. BJORN NORDENSTROM - ENERGY MEDICINE 3. MAX GERSON - CANCER CURE COVER-UP 4. ALFREDO BOWMAN-CANCER CURE COVER-UP 5. STANISLAW BURZYNSKI- CANCER CURE COVER-UP 6. ROYAL RAYMOND RIFE - CANCER CURE COVER-UP 7. SANDRA ROSE MICHAEL -EESystem -CANCER COVER-UP

@@Paul-ew5st 1. STEFAN MARINOV-FREE ENERGY 2. JOHN MULLEN-NUCLEAR PHYSICIST 3. MARK MCCANDLISH- ANTI-GRAVITY PROPULSION 4. DIMITRY PETRONOV -PLASMA BATTERY 5. ZACHARY WARFIELD -PLASMA BATTERY 6. EUGENE MALLOVE- FREE ENERGY DEVICE 7. ARIE DEGEUS -FREE ENERGY-ZERO POINT 8. RORY JOHNSON- COLD FUSION MOTOR 9. MARK TOMION -STAR DRIVE 10. JAMES ALLEN -AEROSPACE ANTIGRAVITY DOCUMENTARY INTERNAL COMBUSTION ENGINES RUNNING ON WATER 1. CHARLES HENRY GARRET - ELECTOLYTIC CARBURETOR 2. ARCHIE BLUE -WATER POWERED CAR 3. DANIEL DINGLE -HYDROGEN REACTOR CAR 4. STANLEY ALLEN MEYER - WATER FUEL CELL 5. BOB BOYCE - ELECTROLYSER 6. STEVE RYAN - 50% WATER 7. PAUL ZIGURAS - HYDROGEN ENGINE 8. FREDDY WELLS -WATER-POWERED ENGINES 9. RYUSHIN OMASA -HYDROGEN-OXYGEN GAS MIXTURE 10. STEAVE EATON -WATER-FUELED ENGINES 11. OLIVER & VALENTIN-WATER-FUELED TECHNOLOGY 12. WALT JENKINS -HYDROGEN & OXYGEN FUEL 1. TOM OGLE - VEHICLE COVER-UP 2. CHARLES NELSON POGUE - VEHICLE COVER-UP 3. TROY REED - VEHICLE COVER-UP ENERGY COVER-UP 1. THOMAS HENRY MORAY - FREE ENERGY 2. JOHN SEARL - FREE ENERGY 3. FLOYD A. SWEET - FREE ENERGY 4. ADAM TROMBLY - FREE ENERGY 5. BRUCE DE PALMA - FREE ENERGY 6. PARAMAHANSA TEWARI - FREE ENERGY CANCER COVER-UP 1. HARRY HOXSEY -CANCER CURE COVER-UP 2. BJORN NORDENSTROM - ENERGY MEDICINE 3. MAX GERSON - CANCER CURE COVER-UP 4. ALFREDO BOWMAN-CANCER CURE COVER-UP 5. STANISLAW BURZYNSKI- CANCER CURE COVER-UP 6. ROYAL RAYMOND RIFE - CANCER CURE COVER-UP 7. SANDRA ROSE MICHAEL -EESystem -CANCER COVER-UP

Absolutely.

Yes Physics is totally normal stuff

@@eddydeathwishe4638 Terrance is a looney bin who's full of shite. He's already been debunked by MANY already.

He allegedly had a hallucinogen problem while on Power. Meth would do it too.

​@@Jilly42Google tan gentsl flight corporation. The lynchpin. One of Terrence Howard's innovative inventions 3 years ago. A working prototype

it’s the latter

@@Evan-yp3oz After further review, it would appear that way.

@@Levelityhahaha yeah

People who do mind altering substances can sort of get where a person who spews nonsensical disjointed ideas with the resemblance of those with schizophrenic delusions is going.....you don't say😂

@@gameking9830 I’m guessing you’ve never tripped.

But he is wrong. Hence why a ‘qualified’ person would not say it. Hence why that doesn’t happen. Educated people also have accountability, so when they say something they face educated individuals who scrutinise it, or even more so have professional bodies/regulators that they are accountable to. TH will go home to his stupid social circles/echo chambers, then jerk himself off while watching his JRE interview

Why? Is it getting more insane?

@@user-ze8zo5uv2s Dude went on to say 1x1 = 2 HAHAHAHAHA! Insane is an understatement my friend.

no he was too busy texting 16 year old girls.. he doesn't have the mental capacity for that interview or even to talk to a grown woman lol

@edishusidic1960 that sounds like you talking about drake 😅

Yes, and it's completely insane nonsense all the way through

Those are all things in the universe, but they are not all the same thing in the universe.

Yes

​@@evonne315??

The sun only reflects light when it's near matter like the earth. But if you go into outer space the sunlight reflection disappears and is a "black hole". Sun's are black dots. It only appears as light when matter is involved. This concept is known in mainstream science.

One of the patents is a shape.....

You know that anyone can get anything patented? You just pay for a patent. You can come up with bullshit and patent it as long as you pay for it. That doesn’t mean anything at all. The day this Terrance Howard invents something then you can call him a genius. Edison, Tesla, Franklin, all geniuses because they put their theories to work and made things that help society. This dude hasn’t done shit.

Insanity is a word we put on things our little human brains can’t understand or handle. We call anything we dont agree with “ crazy” thats how the church burned people and what they did to Galileo ! That part

Yup. Chris supporters and him are so quick to make fun of Terrence. Their attention span is so short. Not only admitting they are ignorant, but dumb too. I tend to be less angry already at such people because I remembered Terrence quote, “there are balance to everything…” I truly believe Terrence will have the last laugh. I respect him. And you.

all he did was show an image of saturn in a bunch of dots... dont bother with any more context as you only stand to lose braincells. he also said the spot on saturn will turn into a planet, and that suns basically poop out planets. at no point does he explain how according to his theory saturns matter came into existance or gathered to create itself. its all just a bunch of misused/mispronounced words for 3 hours. hes demonstrably wrong about so much, its so cringe how many people think this guy actually makes sense. he claims saturns spot (which he claims will be a planet eventually depite the fact that it is just a storm. you cannot have a planet made out of wind) is at the equator. it literally takes 2 seconds to see that is not the case. its 20 degrees from the equator. everything he says is either wrong or just plainly doesnt make sense. youtube "terrance howard debunked". this guy is a clown

@@aizat5b "Chris supporters and him are so quick to make fun of Terrence" Never mind the already 10-20 videos debunking Terrance from ACTUAL scientists with experience and knowledge... Terrance is a straight LOON and the podcast only solidified that.

Chopped him up out of context lol. The guy said 1x1 = 2... You don't need to chop him up to look absolutely foolish, he does that himself.

Reminds me of Andrew Tate but instead of "how many bugatti do YOU have?" It's "how many patents?". Not quite the same flex.

Walter Russel and tesla was around before him this is second hand material he’s just bringing it back up

L. Hubbard was a fictional writer not similar LRon was in a time that people were looking for guru’s. Following John Lennon . Enlightenment. Transcendental meditations.

@@laneneal3510 And...

Your conclusions are laughable

Why does he gotta be stupid? Because you’re dumb to comprehend?

How would you know what a genius sounds like? We have idiots on TV confusing you what a genius actually sounds like.

You're just parroting what other people say like what an idiot would do. If you're gonna critisize him, do it point by point. Be specific. That's how you dismantle arguments. Throwing around useless ad hominems only tells me you either lack critical thinking, or integrity. Or both.

@@X3MAntics thank you! I haven't seen anyone actually break down what Terrence Howard is saying as a way to articulate why he's wrong. I can only find people who just simply discredit the conversation by using personal attacks, or comparing him to a homeless man on the street with schizophrenia. This seems to be like a litmus test of the critical thinkers of the world. Almost as if a polarity is developed between people who see two different realities when they listen to Terrence Howard. It's fascinating to behold.

@@X3MAntics Took the words from my mouth. "person X only sounds smart to idiots" has been said over and over again throughout time. Not a unique take, or an interesting one.

Please elaborate? Point specifics.

what flaw did you see in his logic? please do tell? no one has gotten it right...wonder why?

he does mention.. almost.. the hz of E's when talking about hydrogen and silicone and shit he says "40.5 hz, then it would be like 81 hz" and I have no idea where he gets these numbers in relation to the elements themselves, but E1 is 41.203 hz and E2 is 82.407 hz so he's like.. almost memorized some of the E notes in A440 tuning (wait till he hears about A432 his mind's gonna be gone for real this time) but that's about it

What's happening here is that Terrence Howard is experiencing a schizophrenic break from reality. he studies these topics with an idea in mind and tries to find different mathematical theories that he can bastardize to confirm his preconceived delusional belief. He DOES have these complex theories memorized and at least understood enough on a level where he can bring them up in conversation and connect them to his ideas, which means he's not stupid, but he IS MASSIVELY mentally ill and anyone who's ever spoken to a schizophrenic can tell you that (they all sound like this, it's a very universal way of speaking for them, and the misconception is that they talk about things that aren't real or they sound just random and crazy or whatever, not the case. What actually happens is that they tend to have a pretty decent grasp on a lot of these topics, but they shoehorn them TOGETHER in ways that don't really make sense if you know what they're referring to. But if you're not paying close attention or if you don't understand the topics they're discussing, it can be pretty easy to fall for it and end up thinking what they're saying is legit. It is not legit. If someone is telling you that their one math theory solves EVERYTHING from music to motion to physics to diet loss to flight etc etc, that should be a red flag for you, things in real life generally are not a one solution fixes all type of thing.) He's absolutely not a teacher, he is a schizophrenic rambling and raving and seeing patterns where there are none. The fact that you fall for it is EXTREMELY troubling, you need to promise me that you NEVER find yourself near any cult leaders because you are the PRIME cult victim. You need to spend some time learning critical thinking, right now how you operate is you listen to someone speak and if it sounds articulate enough, you take it as 100% true without actually digging into what they're saying at all. This is an EXTREMELY dangerous way to live. My advice to you is pay extra special close attention to the CONNECTIONS between things he references, because when you do you'll see that the "connector" he sees makes absolutely no sense and is completely arbitrary. So for example he talks about elements vibrating and says that Carbon and Hydrogen having the same "tone" that they both vibrate in the key of E. Where does he get these numbers? He says in the video "So it would be 40.5, then 81" and those are ALMOST E1 and E2 (E1 is 41.20, E2 is 82.41) so he ALMOST has some E note frequencies memorized. But is he talking about molecular vibration? What vibration is he talking about? An easy way to test if Carbon and Hydrogen are vibrating at those frequences is.. YOU WOULD FUCKING HEAR IT, YOUR EARS WOULD LITERALLY HEAR IF CARBON WAS VIBRATING AT 40.5 HZ AND HYDROGEN AT 81 HZ. They literally cannot be vibrating at those frequencies. Two notes vibrating at an "E" note in different octaves is not "the key of E" by the way, they're just two E notes. The key of E is E F# G# A B C# D#. But let's say they were, do you and Terrence Howard know that our scales are entirely manmade? There is not an INHERENT hz number that makes something music. The standard tuning we use in the west today is A=440hz, but you can also use A=432hz which was used historically and is experiencing a resurgence in the present day, so which one is carbon vibrating at, fellas? And what about the musical scales of different cultures, where do those fit in? The arabic scale which has 22 notes? the Indian music systems with 24 notes? What about Pelog, the Indonesian scale, whose notes are considered dissonant in other musical scales? 'Keep an open mind, but not so open that your brains fall out' - James Oberg

James, I did it a couple times. Makes you feel enlightened

He doesn't have a point though, it's literally nonsense. it's hard to critique something that legitimately is incoherent rambling. sometimes people are wrong, or you disagree with their conclusion, but you can see how they logically got there. you can address that and have a conversation. But Terrence is literally just making up random shit. He strings together meaningless sentences like scientists in B tier sci fi movies. he's just banking on people assuming that they didn't understand him because they are too dumb and not wanting to out themselves by questioning him. It's a narcissistic manipulation tactic, not brilliance.

Yeah? Try countering a chattering Monkey. Same difference, nincompoop.

@@ericfortin5612have you ever researched frequencies of the elements? You can’t just say the guy is spewing gibberish without providing some reasonable argument, which you are not even close to doing. I’m not saying he’s 100% correct, but you sound like a complete moron for saying the guy is crazy “just because” like eff off

@@ericfortin5612Bro if you don’t understand then say that but don’t say he’s making up shit. He very blatantly sited his sources.

@@kevmanshawty6402 He IS making shit up...and it's obvious to anyone who isn't dumb.

To be fair, it is the funniest thing he’s done, albeit by accident 🤦🏻‍♂️😆

Why you hear watching his video then? Seems you're just as stupid as Terrance.... I guess you think 1x1 = 2 aswell huh?

NDT literally did a whole peer review of TH's paper. Sabine Hossenfelder made a video about it. It's nonsense. Also I LOVE the appeal to authority, totally forgetting that Terrence Howard is just an ACTOR. It's absolutely fair for a scientific theory to be interpreted by a comedian if the theory was proposed by an actor lmfao, you can't even stay logically consistent unevolved.

I’m aware he’s wrong about most or a lot of this btw.

Why's it good? That's how people like the LGBTQ movement think Men can be Woman... Because others thought it was brave and a good thing to do. When in reality we all know Men can't be Woman and vice versa, now look at the mess they're in.. Men literally dominating woman sports, even going as far as being allowed in Womans locker rooms etc etc.. Point is when you appease crazy people, this is the result you get.

Agreed. At least he's questioning everything and that's a good way to he. Everyone else just ride along to get along and apply no level of critical thinking or high level of perspectives.

If you watched that episode and nothing made sense you are low iq

What's funny is he's actually saying something along the lines of Graham Hancock. Hancock was talking about how one of the "lost technologies" was to move things with sound. And you do that by finding the frequency of the material. Or the "tone" of the element.

@@tPeazyyright on the money

Can you tell us about tones while directly quoting Terrence so we can look it up? You seem to know a lot about them.

That was also an edited video.

The problem is we DO understand both him and the subject matter very well. He's talking complete nonsense. He's not a well man.

@@psiro7966 what is nonsense about it?

​@@paulwall2891 It's all just gibberish. "same wavelength, just twice as long" is not deep. Wavelength is the only property of light that has length. It's like me saying "they are the same length, but one is longer". It is just nonsense. A couple more if you are unsure : You can not turn color into sound (try it) - they are different things and it's nonsense to confuse the 2. Also, you can't half light, that doesn't mean anything, it's nonsense. In case you are watching some of this madman's other content (from the Oxford union address for example), 1x0 does in fact =0. To suggest otherwise is also wrong. This guy talks like a highly functioning drunk.

Well, do you understand what he's saying?

​​​​​@@paulwall2891 well lets start his most basic flaw, 1x1=2, it doesnt, because thats not how multiplication works, thats how addition works. 1+1=2, because you have one unit added to another unit to get two units. When you multiply your counting groups of units, so if i have one group of one unit, i have one unit. Considering thats a big point of "terryology", it really puts a wrench in the gears immediatley. He also claimed that carbon has the same "tone" as hydrogen, it doesnt, and "tone" does not mean musical note as he implied lmfao, he also referred to it as a "bisexual tone", which....hes wrong anyway, but the ONLY possible thing i can guess he meant to say is a "bisectional tone", which is wrong regardless lol. Its just hard to take someone seriously when they outright claim to be the smartest human being on earth (he actuallly said that in the podcast) but then they dont know what proper terminology is and use it incorrectly on top of that.

So what I think you're saying is people don't have the capacity to study more than one discipline? Check this out, Mayim Balik from the Big Bang theory is an actual neuroscientist graduated with a PhD from UCLA, Natalie Portman graduated with a degree in psychology from Harvard, Brian May, you know from Queen, Bohemian Rhapsody? Musical genius, renowned guitarist and yep you guessed it astrophysicist and one more for good measure and one most people probably already know Ken Jeong from The Hangover, got his MD from the University of Carolina, Chapel Hill so I'm not sure how Terrence being an actor automatically mean we should write him off, open your mind, question yes but also be open to new possibilities, it doesn't hurt us to postulate these ideas even if he is wrong because imagine how beautiful it might be if he is correct, he was talking about new possibilities for space travel and his ideas might spark the genius in someone out there to solve inter stella travel or even a way to maintain life here, the possibilities are endless but not if just we shut him down with the age old disgusting crazy attack.

@@twentythree7sevensix too bad terrenace is a college dropout that lies about having a phd.

@@rocko0o Yeah that is unfortunate but people make mistakes, I'd be interested to hear what he was thinking and why he would do such a thing, but if he is truly only 3 credits away, what does it matter? Why do we put so much stock in a PhD anyway? I mean sure it makes some people feel like that validates someone's findings but if he is right then he is right, however I think everyone is missing the point, he is sparking discussion and his ideas are thought provoking it's just a pity that a great portion of people are so closed minded they can't even have the discussion they just need to tear those down that have the courage to go against the grain. Just sheep with a mob mentality.

@@twentythree7sevensixand where did Howard get his PHD from ? 😂😂😂

@@twentythree7sevensix3 credits? He only attended 3 semesters. I'm pretty sure you can't get a PHD in 4 semesters unless it's Trump University