Christian Takes Muslim Off Guard | Hashim | Speakers Corner

  Рет қаралды 175,977

DawahWise

DawahWise

Күн бұрын

#Islam #christianity #debate
Support DawahWise gofund.me/dba0...
=============
Please, Subscribe, Like, leave a comment and Share this video.
We request everyone to maintain the decorum of this forum. We will not tolerate any abuse, bullying, swearing etc. in the comments section. Understandably, it is impossible to monitor every comment 24/7. So, if you see any inappropriate behaviour/comment, please report them to us at dawahwise@gmail.com so that they can be deleted/blocked.
Thank you!
Please, subscribe to @DawahWise. Click the bell icon to get notifications and never miss any of our new videos and Livestreams.
Please support DawahWise 🤝:
Kindly, donate generously to support our ongoing efforts and channel expenses:
❤️ / dawahwise
❤️ paypal.me/dawa...
❤️ Become a DawahWise Member and get access to exclusive Membership perks:
www.youtube.co...
🔗 Please FOLLOW us on Social Media:
👉 / dawah.wise
👉 / dawahwise
👉 / dawahwise.sc
👉 / dawahwise
👉www.youtube.co...
👉dawahwise.com/
👉EMAIL
dawahwise@gmail.com
At DawahWise we have NEVER advocated or encouraged violence or illegal activity, publicly or privately, and we completely disavow anyone who commits violence or breaks the law. We have always encouraged and expected from all our readers / listeners / viewers / students that they obey the laws of their localities as well as international laws.
© 2024 DawahWise. All Rights Reserved

Пікірлер: 812
@DawahWise
@DawahWise Ай бұрын
KZfaq Shadow Banning again Please share, like and comment to break the Algorithm Tell us, where you’re watching from? Full Video: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/f9F0ptFezZfDZKc.html Brothers and Sisters! Please Like, Comment and Share the video to help us reach more people so you can share in the reward in sha Allah! *SUPPORT DAWAHWISE* ❤️www.patreon.com/dawahwise ❤️gofund.me/dba0c96f ❤️www.paypal.me/dawahwise ❤️Join DawahWise Membership: kzfaq.infojoin
@alfianardiansyah6663
@alfianardiansyah6663 Ай бұрын
indonesia
@kamilyasin967
@kamilyasin967 Ай бұрын
Malaysia
@5sweatingpalm
@5sweatingpalm Ай бұрын
The devils servant always do a shadow ban because they serve the master.
@delatorrecilla
@delatorrecilla Ай бұрын
Paris, France
@haniefdalvie6761
@haniefdalvie6761 Ай бұрын
Cape town soth afrika ❤
@zaki_goat
@zaki_goat Ай бұрын
Bro a weak hadith had stronger evidence than the new testimon
@marshalldamons2663
@marshalldamons2663 Ай бұрын
@@zaki_goat lol
@SCD_Recommendation_SecretIsSad
@SCD_Recommendation_SecretIsSad Ай бұрын
Even a SHIA Hadith has stronger evidence
@vox_divini
@vox_divini Ай бұрын
Really ...you wanna debate on it bro...u seems to be so sure of it ...lets see how sure you are
@abdelmoumenkouba4533
@abdelmoumenkouba4533 Ай бұрын
@@vox_divini yes he is right since a weak Hadith can have a chain of narration back to the prophet but one of the narraters is weak or known to be weak in remembering thing so although there’s a full chain back to the prophet scholars don’t accept the Hadith
@_Cfocus
@_Cfocus Ай бұрын
​​​@@vox_diviniits not a question to be debated, go search what weak hadith is, not even close to how mysterious your bible origin is, we have a very high standard
@IamALSarah
@IamALSarah Ай бұрын
My Qur'an is preserved from the time of Prophet pbuh 😁
@mytraveldiary1144
@mytraveldiary1144 Ай бұрын
Muhammad's sahaba uthman, Burnt out quran copies because it was corrupted, And some of the the manuscripts of quran, eaten by goat ... Bhukari Hadidh said that... Also, , the reciters of quran recite as per their & their style after muhammad... And they try to kill each other beacuse of that variations... Quran is a corrupted one , Not a preserved one... Allah failed to guard quran....
@thecomedymask9089
@thecomedymask9089 Ай бұрын
Lol this shows your ignorance thode are qiraat different ways of reading the Quran​@@sshhc187
@IamALSarah
@IamALSarah Ай бұрын
@@sshhc187 If this had entered your head then you wouldn't come here to babble.
@-Onetruth-
@-Onetruth- Ай бұрын
​@@mytraveldiary1144 you forgot the part where uthman and his entire committee were Quran memorizers including most of his people
@AlAmin-ir3xs
@AlAmin-ir3xs Ай бұрын
These are recitation style all have chain going back to the prophet​@@sshhc187
@theluckyone6580
@theluckyone6580 Ай бұрын
Weak hadith is more stronger than the bible 😂
@mohdfarhan5255
@mohdfarhan5255 Ай бұрын
Right. The Bible are not even in competition with the Quran.
@fakhrulislam6869
@fakhrulislam6869 Ай бұрын
Fr😂
@shahinahmad9695
@shahinahmad9695 Ай бұрын
Even fabricated Hadith 😂. Cause our Scholars know very well who invented that and who was he, his background etc
@atimans309
@atimans309 Ай бұрын
@@shahinahmad9695 so truee. We can detect sahih (authentic); weak; and fake hadith. SubhanAllah indeed preservation by Allah
@sassdcc8692
@sassdcc8692 Ай бұрын
What is weak Hadiths?
@mrsaluyt
@mrsaluyt Ай бұрын
In Islam we have the preserved Quran, the Hadith, the history and even the language ❤
@AncientPharaoh
@AncientPharaoh Ай бұрын
They have tried so many times to corrupt but they keep on failing because it’s in our hearts and minds.
@richardransome4943
@richardransome4943 Ай бұрын
Liar
@mrsaluyt
@mrsaluyt Ай бұрын
@@richardransome4943 Why lil bro?
@marshalldamons2663
@marshalldamons2663 Ай бұрын
Lol😂
@Zio-Ita
@Zio-Ita Ай бұрын
Haha the koran is written and selected by somebody and it denies that jesus is lord.. you dont submit to god but to the koran .. if you want to submit to god you have to follow jesus
@user-bp8ec6yj1e
@user-bp8ec6yj1e Ай бұрын
You know why the Quran hasn't changed yet because Allah preserved it.
@marshalldamons2663
@marshalldamons2663 Ай бұрын
Lol😂
@lightshadernft8156
@lightshadernft8156 Ай бұрын
@@marshalldamons2663?
@manuanto8750
@manuanto8750 Ай бұрын
no, one of your muslim leader burned the different version of quran. HIs name is "Uthman ibn 'Affan"
@lightshadernft8156
@lightshadernft8156 Ай бұрын
@@manuanto8750 atleast do some research over why they were burned
@user-bp8ec6yj1e
@user-bp8ec6yj1e Ай бұрын
@@manuanto8750 yes do some reserch
@TommyGok
@TommyGok Ай бұрын
Hadeeth were not written 200 years after Muhammad SAW. It was written during his time, Bukhari just collected authentic ones 200 years after which he took from the students of the Sahaba RA.
@zakariakakar1
@zakariakakar1 Ай бұрын
He already said
@omarsayed3874
@omarsayed3874 Ай бұрын
Not all of them were written, they were mostly transmitted verbally until they were collected around the year 100 hijri
@TommyGok
@TommyGok Ай бұрын
@@omarsayed3874 Imam Malik's Muwwata is one of the earliest, the transmission of the Qur'an and is exact same the way Hadeeth were transmitted. The Qur'an is preserved because we know through the sciences of hadeeth that it is mutawatir.
@omarsayed3874
@omarsayed3874 Ай бұрын
@@TommyGok and the muwatta of Imam Malik was after the year 100, since he was born around 93 hijri
@yamanz5146
@yamanz5146 Ай бұрын
.
@johnbarron88
@johnbarron88 Ай бұрын
This implies something wrong. The bible wasn’t written 300 years after Jesus’s resurrection/ascension. The bible is a collection of books and letters. The gospels were written very closely to the time of Jesus.. the gospel of Mark, for example, was written before the Romans sacked Jerusalem in 70 AD. Jesus’s crucifixion was approximately 33 AD. Not only that, but the apostles taught and expanded his Orthodox Church prior to the gospels being written.
@dougboy2856
@dougboy2856 Ай бұрын
All the Gospels can't even agree if Jesus God or the son of God Matthew mark luke john all say he's a prophet 👇 Matthew 21:11 ☝️ And the crowds said, “This is the prophet Jesus, from Nazareth of Galilee Luke 4:24 ☝️ Truly, I say to you, no prophet is acceptable in his hometown Mark 6:3-4 ☝️ Then they scoffed . . . . They were deeply offended and refused to believe in him. Then Jesus told them, “A PROPHET is honored everywhere except in his own hometown and among his relatives and his own family” John 12:49-50 ☝️ For I did not speak on my own initiative, but the Father himself who sent me has given me a commandment as to what to say and what to speak. I know that His commandment is eternal life; therefore the things I speak, I speak just as the Father has told me John 8:28 ☝️ So Jesus said, "When YOU lift up the Son of MAN, then you will know that I am he, and I do nothing on my own initiative, but I speak these things as the Father TAUGHT me John 6:14 ☝️ After the people saw the sign Jesus performed, they began to say, “Surely this is the PROPHET who is to come into the world John 7:16 ☝️ So Jesus answered them and said, "My teaching is NOT mine, but his who sent me" He even leaves ah reminder for the disbelievers that think he's god or the son of god Matthew 7:22-23 ☝️ Many will say to me on that day, 'Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name and in your name drive out demons and in your name perform many miracles? ' Then I will tell them plainly, 'I never knew you. Away from me, you evildoers! ☝️☝️☝️☝️
@dougboy2856
@dougboy2856 Ай бұрын
All the Gospels can't even agree if Jesus God or the son of God Matthew mark luke john all say he's a prophet 👇 Matthew 21:11 ☝️ And the crowds said, “This is the prophet Jesus, from Nazareth of Galilee Luke 4:24 ☝️ Truly, I say to you, no prophet is acceptable in his hometown Mark 6:3-4 ☝️ Then they scoffed . . . . They were deeply offended and refused to believe in him. Then Jesus told them, “A PROPHET is honored everywhere except in his own hometown and among his relatives and his own family” John 12:49-50 ☝️ For I did not speak on my own initiative, but the Father himself who sent me has given me a commandment as to what to say and what to speak. I know that His commandment is eternal life; therefore the things I speak, I speak just as the Father has told me John 8:28 ☝️ So Jesus said, "When YOU lift up the Son of MAN, then you will know that I am he, and I do nothing on my own initiative, but I speak these things as the Father TAUGHT me John 6:14 ☝️ After the people saw the sign Jesus performed, they began to say, “Surely this is the PROPHET who is to come into the world John 7:16 ☝️ So Jesus answered them and said, "My teaching is NOT mine, but his who sent me" He even leaves ah reminder for the disbelievers that think he's god or the son of god Matthew 7:22-23 ☝️ Many will say to me on that day, 'Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name and in your name drive out demons and in your name perform many miracles? ' Then I will tell them plainly, 'I never knew you. Away from me, you evildoers! ☝️☝️☝️☝️☝️
@johnbarron88
@johnbarron88 Ай бұрын
@@dougboy2856 he who has ears to hear, let him hear. There is no contradiction here. You just don’t have understanding of Christology and the Trinity. He is a union of God and man, fully God.. fully man. Can God not do this? Take on our nature to redeem mankind? He created all. He is all powerful. Please try to give an honest reading of the holy scripture. Read the Orthodox study bible with the footnotes. Truly consider it, because.. given just the first quote you gave as your “proof”.. it’s clearly what the multitudes said. The multitudes that said to crucify him just a week later. Jesus did make prophecy. He is also God. This is just lazy.. to point to this as a contradiction in a historical account. The multitudes can literally have said anything, and that wouldn’t necessarily mean it was correct about him. tl;dr if you’re pointing to this, you’re reading it wrong… or not even reading it. Christ himself didn’t do as many works around people who had little faith, out of love of them.. to prevent them from blaspheming and to respect their free will to love him. He accepted, in humility, the love those were willing to give. Far below what is due to Him. As far as Him showing He is God, I’m sure enough Christians have refuted this on many comments. “Before Abraham was, I AM” “Those who have seen me have seen the Father” all of the “I AM” statements. Literally the beginning of the gospel of John talks about it. It’s everywhere. He forgave sins, he will judge the world at his second coming. Only God can judge. Only God can forgive sins. It was because he is God, and rightfully said so, that the jews sought to kill him. Christ’s tomb was empty. Many saw him risen. Many saw him ascend to heaven. I encourage you to perhaps watch some videos or read about the Gospel/quran from an Orthodox perspective.
@R33fs
@R33fs 8 күн бұрын
​@@johnbarron88 the way I understand, the concept of trinity is just colection of assumption and indication that Jesus is the "literal son of god", but never did Jesus told man to worship him, he never claim he is a God but instead he told man to worship only God. Before Abraham was, i am...that doent mean he is God. In islam we believe that the Ruh (soul) is created before born. we even believe that Muhammad pbuh sould is created before Adam pbuh . That doesnt mean he is a God. So th same thing might be same for Jesus (his soul is created before Abraham). We also believe that Muhammad pbuh have many blessing, miracles etc. But it is with the permission of God. Same can be said with your all other "proof". Coming back to the authenticity of bible, knowing that it is translated and compied written books, it is very easy you ended up with totaly different meaning (god-man / father-son, god/lord/king) which further bolden the assumption.
@johnbarron88
@johnbarron88 8 күн бұрын
@@R33fs translations? I’m pretty sure we have the original manuscripts. You also are throwing out that the Orthodox Church has existed since then and before there even was written scripture. The apostles, those who actually were first hand there, taught and evangelized. This church exists to this day with unaltered teachings.
@HHassan-bt6hk
@HHassan-bt6hk 7 күн бұрын
Alhamdulilah for being Muslim
@simbo777
@simbo777 Ай бұрын
It wasnt written 300 years later. smh. The bible is not 1 book. Its multiple book. So if you wanted information on an old king would you need information directly from him or the eyewitnesses documents? The gospels where written in the 1st century. How did mohammeds description of Jesus's words a more reliable source than the eyewitnesses. This is just sad to see
@silentsalt9199
@silentsalt9199 Ай бұрын
What is the new testament
@Bladesofkaos
@Bladesofkaos Ай бұрын
That's why the book is doubtful. Too many unknown writers.
@simbo777
@simbo777 Ай бұрын
@@Bladesofkaos what's the proof of these unknown writers? I could say the same for the Quran a page got eaten by a goat + uthman burned 12 version of the Quran which he didn't agree with. You know that the Quran has versions where the words are completely different.
@R33fs
@R33fs 8 күн бұрын
@@simbo777 Here we go again ... Its called unknown because no body can confirm who the writers. Instead you should be the one give us proof who is the writer. the Qur'an is orally transmitted. so disposing uncompiled/unconformed text is just make sense. Are you talking abaout qiraat? Do you know arabic? Arabic the words consist of consonant letters, which when spoken may sound differently for diffrent dialect... but the letters, the worrds are still the same.
@senasezer422
@senasezer422 4 күн бұрын
​​@@simbo777Whoever came up with this Uthman story has a special place in hell because Im sick of explaining this to Christians. Uthman r.a didnt burn the copies "he didnt agree with", the Quran was revealed to Muhammad ﷺ in 7 dialects of Arabic to make it easier for people to understand. After Muhammad ﷺ passed away, people started accusing each other of pronouncing the Quran wrong but in fact all 7 dialects were from God. Uthman r.a, who was the ruler at the time and used to be one of the closest companions of Muhammad ﷺ, wanted to end disputes and unite all Muslims on one pronounciation so he chose the Qurayshi dialect which was the native dialect of Muhammad ﷺ. The copies that were in the other 6 dialects were burnt. These copies were not different in content or message, they were different in pronounciation.
@tokmiyah007
@tokmiyah007 Ай бұрын
We even have a chain of reading of the Quran from today's reciters that dates back to the Prophet Muhammad sallalahu alaihi wasallam. And we know all the reciters biodata. Alhamdulillah for Islam ❤
@user-me9rh5fl6q
@user-me9rh5fl6q 12 күн бұрын
We have the chain of bulls
@Milly5216
@Milly5216 Ай бұрын
Saying the Bible was written 300 years after Jesus is not technically correct. It was compiled. All of the New Testament writings were within 100 years of Christ’s life. And the Law and the Prophets were kept by the Jews and we have historical documentation to prove it. Not just faith, but actual evidence to confirm our faith.
@alptekin6299
@alptekin6299 Ай бұрын
@@Milly5216 what are those documentation? How do we find it? Do these documentation include the writers of those books? What are the content of it?
@ethancorsmeier1110
@ethancorsmeier1110 Ай бұрын
​@@alptekin6299 the document would be Against Heresies by Irenaeus. In 3.1.1 he says, "Matthew also issued a written Gospel among the Hebrews in their own dialect, while Peter and Paul were preaching at Rome, and laying the foundations of the Church. After their departure, Mark, the disciple and interpreter of Peter, did also hand down to us in writing what had been preached by Peter. Luke also, the companion of Paul, recorded in a book the Gospel preached by him. Afterwards, John, the disciple of the Lord, who also had leaned upon His breast, did himself publish a Gospel during his residence at Ephesus in Asia." This is from the mid second century and irenaeus is a student of polycarp, who is a student of John, son of Zebedee and disciple of Jesus.
@Iraniansunnimuslim
@Iraniansunnimuslim Ай бұрын
Exactly, much of bible is written by John, but no one knows who he is or where he came from. And yet they are sure it's from God, ironic
@theluckyone6580
@theluckyone6580 Ай бұрын
he is John Cena
@Iraniansunnimuslim
@Iraniansunnimuslim Ай бұрын
@@theluckyone6580 bruh
@IamALSarah
@IamALSarah Ай бұрын
​@@theluckyone6580 Invisible guy 💀
@_unknown123.
@_unknown123. Ай бұрын
I know which John....John the unknown
@truthspeaker12
@truthspeaker12 Ай бұрын
every 2nd person is a john and every second woman is a mary in new testament. what is the point of a name, if everyone is named the same?? Million dollar question, how many Marys went to the tomb?
@odeebob7826
@odeebob7826 27 күн бұрын
May Allah bless and reward you and all those involved for all your effort
@HellllooKittttyyyyy
@HellllooKittttyyyyy Ай бұрын
Alhamdulillah for ISLAM ☝️🏴🏳️
@Bluefalconspiracies
@Bluefalconspiracies 7 күн бұрын
It’s like two flat earthers debating which flat earth model is better😂
@conradtmariri3513
@conradtmariri3513 Ай бұрын
The truth the way remains, Christ Jesus way to our Father, free will and absolutely your last breath you know that 😅 God is good ✌️🌎♥️
@rayhanmustakim7073
@rayhanmustakim7073 9 күн бұрын
Emphasis on the word "way", the way isn't the same as the destination, so if Jesus is the way to God then he's NOT the God Himself.
@mariamajalloh197
@mariamajalloh197 5 күн бұрын
Yes he is one of the ways to Allah like all other who came we the massage so follow him the way he asked you to follow him like am doing now thank you
@conradtmariri3513
@conradtmariri3513 3 күн бұрын
@@rayhanmustakim7073 🤣 free will you know the way 😉 But scared 😳
@lifethroughromans8295
@lifethroughromans8295 Ай бұрын
The concept of a "chain of narration" (isnad) as used in Islamic tradition does not have a direct equivalent in Christianity. However, there are elements in the history and transmission of the New Testament that serve similar purposes in verifying the authenticity and reliability of the texts. Here's an overview: Apostolic Authorship and Attribution Apostolic Origins: Many New Testament books are traditionally attributed to apostles or their close associates. For example, the Gospels of Matthew and John are attributed to apostles, while Mark and Luke are attributed to close companions of Peter and Paul, respectively. Epistles: The letters of Paul, Peter, James, John, and Jude are considered to have been written by these apostolic figures or their direct followers. Early Manuscripts and Church Fathers Early Manuscripts: The New Testament books have been preserved in numerous ancient manuscripts. The earliest fragments date back to the early 2nd century CE, with more complete manuscripts appearing by the 3rd and 4th centuries. Church Fathers: Early Christian writers and Church Fathers, such as Clement of Rome (late 1st century), Ignatius of Antioch (early 2nd century), and Polycarp (early 2nd century), referenced New Testament texts in their writings. These references help establish the existence and use of these texts in early Christian communities. Canon Formation Recognition by Early Churches: Different Christian communities recognized certain texts as authoritative and used them in worship and teaching. Over time, there was a broad consensus on the core books of the New Testament. Councils and Synods: Councils such as the Synod of Hippo (393 CE) and the Council of Carthage (397 CE) played key roles in affirming the canon of the New Testament, which was largely based on the consensus already present in the churches. Textual Criticism and Transmission Textual Criticism: Scholars have engaged in textual criticism, comparing thousands of manuscript copies to reconstruct the most likely original text. This work helps ensure that modern translations are as accurate as possible to the original writings. Patristic Citations: Quotations and references to New Testament texts by early Church Fathers provide additional evidence for the texts' authenticity and transmission history. Oral Tradition and Community Transmission Oral Tradition: Before the New Testament books were written, the teachings and events of Jesus' life were transmitted orally within early Christian communities. This oral tradition was foundational for the written texts. Community Transmission: Early Christian communities played a crucial role in copying, preserving, and transmitting the texts. The communal nature of this process provided a form of collective validation and transmission. While the New Testament does not have a formalized chain of narration like the isnad in Islam, the combination of apostolic authorship, early manuscript evidence, patristic references, and the historical process of canon formation collectively serve to establish the authenticity and reliability of the New Testament texts.
@Danhamer1988
@Danhamer1988 Ай бұрын
Theirs no evidence the chain of narration is legitimate so what’s his point. Theirs no historical evidence whatsoever to support it
@kriari_6662
@kriari_6662 Ай бұрын
Jesus loves you
@mariamajalloh197
@mariamajalloh197 5 күн бұрын
And we love him too
@kriari_6662
@kriari_6662 5 күн бұрын
@@mariamajalloh197 yes you love Jesus the son of god may god bless you my friend
@frozo12
@frozo12 11 күн бұрын
Imagine someone comes now and say that Jesus came to him in dreams and gave him new commands, would you believe him? 🤔
@yaramustafa8811
@yaramustafa8811 Ай бұрын
Alhamdulillah
@atiffalahi8888
@atiffalahi8888 Ай бұрын
اللهم اعز الاسلام والمسلمين وحمي حوزة الدين
@LouisNicholson-my4yv
@LouisNicholson-my4yv 10 күн бұрын
Grown men arguing over which imaginary man in the sky is the real one will never fail to make me laugh.
@ezamyazny5877
@ezamyazny5877 2 күн бұрын
Someday you and I will meet that 'imaginary man' afterlife for sure
@Helper859
@Helper859 Ай бұрын
Why people worship human being or its idol ? While real God is ? [112: 1] Say, "He is Allāh, [who is] One, [112: 2] Allāh, the Eternal Refuge. [112 : 3] He neither begets nor is born, [112 : 4] Nor is there to Him any equivalent." - The Unity, Qur'an
@KodaMoh42
@KodaMoh42 Ай бұрын
Allahu Akbar
@nooneyouknow5002
@nooneyouknow5002 Ай бұрын
That "what! " was so satisfying 😅
@AlvaPa_Steakisgood
@AlvaPa_Steakisgood Ай бұрын
Bro the earliest Bible manuscript is actually in the 4th Century
@nakinaki7991
@nakinaki7991 Ай бұрын
Christians have lost Great Prophet by converting him to "god"
@trentitybrehm5105
@trentitybrehm5105 Ай бұрын
We have the writing of the disciples of the Apostles and the disciples of those disciples, and they not only quote much of the New Testament, but all the core idea of Christianty are present. Jesus being God, the Son of God, dying for sins, burial, resurrection, ascension to heaven. We also have writing of Jewish and Pagan contemporary historians who were hostile towards Jesus, who say the same things : Jesus being worshipped as God, the Son of God, dying for on the cross, burial, resurrection. The archeology matches the Bible perfectly all the way from Genesis through the New Testament. It's mainly because of the archeology, "friendly" writers, and "hostile" writers mentioned above that the Jesus Seminar, who are PhD level ashiest/agnostics who study Christ and the Bible, concluded that Jesus really lived in Judea 2,000 years ago, was known as a miracle workers, died on the cross under Pilate, and that his disciples really believed they had seen him risen from the dead. The fact that there are contradictions between manuscripts is often sited as proof against trusting scripture, when it actually does the opposite. The fact that there are so many manuscripts makes it easy to tell when someone changed one, and modern Bibles are transparent about any differences in the footnotes. Over 5,000 manuscripts in the original Greek and 20,000 in other lanuages. None of those differences found between manuscripts change anything about any core doctrines of Christianity, they are mainly a handwriting error on a letter or a different way to word something that means the same thing. There is 99.5% accuracy between the manuscripts according to scholars. There is also all the undisigned coincidence between not only the four Gospels, but the rest of the New and Old Testaments too. Matthew 2:22 talks about Joseph not wanting to return to Judea after fleeing to Egypt because Archelaus was ruling. That's all the info on that the Bible gives. Josephus, the Jewish historian, tells us about the things Archelaus did and how evil he was. Put these two peices of evidence together, we get the full picture. This sort of thing happens through the text with the seemingly useless details matching up perfectly with extra Biblical sources, lending to the credibility of the text. The Apostles willingness to be killed not for saying they believed Jesus had risen, but they knew he had risen, because they saw him. If the tomb wasn't empty, they would've paraded the body around to stomp out any idea of Jesus being ressurrected, but Christianty spread because there was no body in the tomb. If someone stole the body, why were nearly all the Apostles willing to be killed for saying they'd seen Jesus risen? They were thousands of miles away from one another before phones and the internet and were being threaten, tortured, and murdered for their claim. Not one "broke" and said it was a lie to save themselves. It's because of the evidence that I believe in Jesus.
@user-gr7jz3di6b
@user-gr7jz3di6b Ай бұрын
He literally said that he was god
@jailani68
@jailani68 Ай бұрын
SubhanaAllah❤Recite and understand the Al-Quran❤
@Circa_2nd
@Circa_2nd 10 күн бұрын
And the Quran is 600 years after Jesus. Wanna play that game? Because we can
@mrandroid2191
@mrandroid2191 12 күн бұрын
The Hadith came later in a bid to try and support a poorly written Qur'an. Even the hadith failed ad evidence.
@igoblin8326
@igoblin8326 13 күн бұрын
Not only Luke and Mark, Paul also never meet Jesus eyes to eyes.
@manypeoples1creator
@manypeoples1creator Күн бұрын
Who is that liar that said the Bible was WRITTEN 300 years after Jesus? Why is that Muslim entertaining that lie by not correcting him?
@user-qk3ib9ur6n
@user-qk3ib9ur6n 11 күн бұрын
The Quran was made 700 years after Jesus born
@briantorsell
@briantorsell 10 күн бұрын
The koran needs the Bible to be true, the Bible doesn't need the koran
@leojohn6702
@leojohn6702 10 күн бұрын
Beside this, the quaran says bible it’s true. So automatically we take out of the discussion Islam.
@reddicetwiceX10
@reddicetwiceX10 Ай бұрын
The Bible was written along with the Harry Potter books. 😂😂😂😂
@Leyla_Bat_Murrah
@Leyla_Bat_Murrah Ай бұрын
Read the Holy t errorism of the Bible: *Joshua **6:21* *Samuel 15:3* *Numbers **31:17**-18* *Ezekiel 9:5-6* *Jeremiah 48:10* *Hosea **13:16* *Matthew 10:34-35*
@Bussman.
@Bussman. Ай бұрын
Ironic
@TrutH-33
@TrutH-33 Ай бұрын
The whole koran is bullshit
@thelatinoguy
@thelatinoguy Ай бұрын
Incorrect, and I rebuke you in the name of Christ Joshua 6:21 the Lord God gave the entire region of Judea to the Israelites. The city of Jericho was within those bounds and refused to fall under the authority of Israel, and so Joshua met with the Son as confirmation that God wanted them to destroy Jericho for their disobedience. Even to this day, Jericho is a cursed city Samuel 15:3 this makes no sense. There are 2 Samuel books, you must specify which one. Either way, I know you speak of 1 Samuel 15:3. The Kingdom of Amalek was condemned because they dared to attack the Israelites as they came out from Egypt. God was so merciful as to have Saul warn another king of the attack because they were good to Israel. Amalek was even more despised by God than Jericho, so much so that He commanded Saul to utterly destroy them, to not take ANYTHING as trophy. Numbers 31:17-18 the people of Midian caused the people of Israel to sin against God as they passed through their territory. Once the Israelites won the war and took for spoils the metals and women and children, Moses himself rebuked the army Captains, saying that these same women were the cause of Israel's sin, and so he ordered for all the males and the nonvirgins to be purged. Only the women who knew no man were allowed to stay since they didn't participate in the sins of their mothers and fathers. Ezekiel 9:5-6 Jerusalem has become corrupted by abominations, by massive numbers of idol worship. Even in the temple of God, there were people praying to the sun, and all these people thought of God as lesser, thinking God couldn't see them in their homes and the dark places. God was merciful, however, to those that detested the acts of those idol worshippers. Jeremiah 48:10 yet more judgement against idol worshippers. This time towards the accursed people of Moab, whom descend from the incest of Lot and his daughters after the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah. The moabites were a large reason why many israelites turned their eyes from God and towards idols, and so, to cut down this sinful root, God had their kind utterly eradicated. Hosea 13:16 ANOTHER instance of God punishing idol worshippers, but now because the very king of Israel at the time, Ephraim lowered himself to worship of Baal, and brought the rest of Israel to that pagan worship. Matthew 10:34-35 this is the grossest choice you would choose to try and say terrorism. Christ says that if you do not put God before everyone and everything, you will not even be worthy to suffer for Christ. He then explains for the sake of Christ, people will come to hate you, including your own mother, father, wife and children, if they don't already follow Christ.
@_unknown123.
@_unknown123. Ай бұрын
Let's say Jesus' disciples died in the first 100 years... that's 3 generations
@LucaGiovanni490
@LucaGiovanni490 Ай бұрын
Religions have one big problem, some people are believed to go in heaven just because God wants them to.
@lifethroughromans8295
@lifethroughromans8295 Ай бұрын
That's false. Bible was not written 300 years later. Compiled 300 years later. Old Testament (Hebrew Bible) Writing Period: The Old Testament books were written between approximately 1200 BCE and 165 BCE. Torah (Pentateuch): Traditionally attributed to Moses and written around 1400-1200 BCE. Historical Books: Written from around 1000 BCE to 400 BCE. Prophets and Writings: Written between 800 BCE and 400 BCE. Compilation: The Old Testament was gradually compiled and recognized as canonical by Jewish communities by around 200 BCE. The final form was likely solidified by the 1st century CE. New Testament Writing Period: The New Testament books were written between approximately 50 CE and 100 CE. Epistles: Earliest writings, with Paul's letters dating from around 50-60 CE. Gospels: Written between 60 CE and 90 CE. Revelation and other letters: Written towards the end of the 1st century. Compilation: The New Testament was gradually recognized and compiled into its current form over the first few centuries CE. Key milestones include: Muratorian Fragment (ca. 170 CE): An early list of New Testament books. Council of Carthage (397 CE): Helped solidify the canon for the Western Church. Overall Compilation Jewish Canon: The Hebrew Bible (Tanakh) was largely fixed by the 1st century CE. Christian Canon: The Christian Old Testament includes the books of the Hebrew Bible, and the New Testament canon was solidified by the 4th century CE.
@NadeemHussain-rt3fd
@NadeemHussain-rt3fd Ай бұрын
The word Bible comes from the Greek word BIBLOS which means a collection of Books and no one knows who the Authors are because they are all according to what Mark, Luke, Mathew and John thought!!! 🤦🏽
@ethancorsmeier1110
@ethancorsmeier1110 Ай бұрын
Maybe read a bit more into the history of the Church before spouting this nonsense. Matthew was a disciple of Jesus, mark was an interpreter for Peter, luke was a companion of Paul, and John was a disciple of Jesus. Newsflash, they didn't even write half of the new testament. Paul wrote 13 letters, John wrote 3, peter wrote 2, and Jude wrote 1. And if you want I can give you more about the authors of the new testament books but I'll just leave this here, Against Heresies 3.1.1, "Matthew also issued a written Gospel among the Hebrews in their own dialect, while Peter and Paul were preaching at Rome, and laying the foundations of the Church. After their departure, Mark, the disciple and interpreter of Peter, did also hand down to us in writing what had been preached by Peter. Luke also, the companion of Paul, recorded in a book the Gospel preached by him. Afterwards, John, the disciple of the Lord, who also had leaned upon His breast, did himself publish a Gospel during his residence at Ephesus in Asia."
@NadeemHussain-rt3fd
@NadeemHussain-rt3fd Ай бұрын
@@ethancorsmeier1110 Why don’t you look it up!! NO one knows who wrote your Gossips!!! 🤦🏽
@NadeemHussain-rt3fd
@NadeemHussain-rt3fd Ай бұрын
@@ethancorsmeier1110 There is much disagreement within biblical scholarship today over the authorship of the Bible.[1] The majority of scholars believe that most of the books of the Bible are the work of multiple authors and that all have been edited to produce the works known today.[2] The following article outlines the conclusions of the majority of contemporary scholars, along with the traditional views, both Jewish and Christian.
@NadeemHussain-rt3fd
@NadeemHussain-rt3fd Ай бұрын
@@ethancorsmeier1110 The Bible is believed to have been written from multiple anonymous ... 21 Mar 2023 - Most writings in ancient times, biblical works included, are anonymous. That's the standard.
@NadeemHussain-rt3fd
@NadeemHussain-rt3fd Ай бұрын
@@ethancorsmeier1110 It’s the 21st Century!! You think people can’t look up the truth for themselves??? After waffling with all that Bs you still got your a ss handed to you!!! 🤦🏽
@davinderrehal6151
@davinderrehal6151 Ай бұрын
Chain of narration is like a Chinese whisper and word of mouth.
@D.Mcphearson
@D.Mcphearson Ай бұрын
And what about the 3rd caliph Uthman When the task was finished Uthman kept one copy in Medina and sent others to Kufa, Baṣra, Damascus, and, according to some accounts, Mecca, and ordered that all other variant copies of the Quran be destroyed. This was done everywhere except in Kufa, where some scholars argue that Ibn Masʿūd and his followers refused.
@pulaispringsphone3367
@pulaispringsphone3367 Ай бұрын
Where you get this😂. Read more
@PastPresentFuture-pr4pm
@PastPresentFuture-pr4pm 17 күн бұрын
Some hadith with chains of narration are abused or falsely inputted as chains, and sometimes similar names are used but not the actual person.
@mohammedsha1
@mohammedsha1 Ай бұрын
Ibn Mas'ud (R.A.A) was a servant of Muhammad(saw) and he compiled many hadith 50 yrs after Muhammad(Saw)s death.Many great works by Bukhari and so on link back to him.
@suichinggo8236
@suichinggo8236 Ай бұрын
The Christian doesn't know the fact. The scriptures of the Jews, the "Old testament", and the gospels, and the writings of the disciples of Christ was NOT written in the 3rd century, but rather the scriptures of the Jews, "the Old testament, and the gospels and the writings of Jesus ' disciples were gathered and compiled into a book, the Bible, I think more of in the 4th century .
@andhbak
@andhbak Ай бұрын
Christianity is disqualified when they fail to bring Bible in the aramic language because you can't expect a book in Hebrew while the founder speaks Aramaic. Christianity is weired
@aethxathr9327
@aethxathr9327 Ай бұрын
no tf it isn’t disqualified just because it wasn’t written in Aramaic 💀💀 and parts of the messianic bible were written in Aramaic. You see, unlike Islam where the Quran is meant specifically to be understood in Arabic, the love of God and Christianity is meant for ALL nations, irrespective of language and borders. Why would they write the entire bible in Aramaic if the lingua Franca of the time was Greek? Obviously they would write in mostly in Greek and Hebrew but more so Greek because people weren’t obligated to know and speak Aramaic in order to converse with people of other nations but they did need to know Greek in order to do that. There’s no reason to spread the good news of Jesus if no one can understand the language it’s written in. If you did even tiniest amount of research and used historical context, you would have realised that only a small percentage of people at the time even spoke Aramaic. Think before you write something out next time.
@normalman8447
@normalman8447 Ай бұрын
@@andhbak Jesus spoke Aramaic, hebrew, and Greek. Read more.
@normalman8447
@normalman8447 Ай бұрын
@@andhbak so the Bible isn't disqualified after all, huh?
@Eljotto
@Eljotto 17 күн бұрын
What that bs? Whats the argument?
@normalman8447
@normalman8447 17 күн бұрын
@@Eljotto first of all, Jesus didn't write anything in the Bible. It doesn't matter which languages he spoke. That point is bullshit. Also, Jesus also spoke Hebrew and Greek. The Bible is essentially written on Hebrew and Greek. So... There you have it.
@elixirforever007
@elixirforever007 Ай бұрын
They don't follow Christianity, they follow Paulinity.
@trentitybrehm5105
@trentitybrehm5105 Ай бұрын
We have the writing of the disciples of the Apostles and the disciples of those disciples, and they not only quote much of the New Testament, but all the core idea of Christianty are present. Jesus being God, the Son of God, dying for sins, burial, resurrection, ascension to heaven. We also have writing of Jewish and Pagan contemporary historians who were hostile towards Jesus, who say the same things : Jesus being worshipped as God, the Son of God, dying for on the cross, burial, resurrection. The archeology matches the Bible perfectly all the way from Genesis through the New Testament. It's mainly because of the archeology, "friendly" writers, and "hostile" writers mentioned above that the Jesus Seminar, who are PhD level ashiest/agnostics who study Christ and the Bible, concluded that Jesus really lived in Judea 2,000 years ago, was known as a miracle workers, died on the cross under Pilate, and that his disciples really believed they had seen him risen from the dead. The fact that there are contradictions between manuscripts is often sited as proof against trusting scripture, when it actually does the opposite. The fact that there are so many manuscripts makes it easy to tell when someone changed one, and modern Bibles are transparent about any differences in the footnotes. Over 5,000 manuscripts in the original Greek and 20,000 in other lanuages. None of those differences found between manuscripts change anything about any core doctrines of Christianity, they are mainly a handwriting error on a letter or a different way to word something that means the same thing. There is 99.5% accuracy between the manuscripts according to scholars. There is also all the undisigned coincidence between not only the four Gospels, but the rest of the New and Old Testaments too. Matthew 2:22 talks about Joseph not wanting to return to Judea after fleeing to Egypt because Archelaus was ruling. That's all the info on that the Bible gives. Josephus, the Jewish historian, tells us about the things Archelaus did and how evil he was. Put these two peices of evidence together, we get the full picture. This sort of thing happens through the text with the seemingly useless details matching up perfectly with extra Biblical sources, lending to the credibility of the text. The Apostles willingness to be killed not for saying they believed Jesus had risen, but they knew he had risen, because they saw him. If the tomb wasn't empty, they would've paraded the body around to stomp out any idea of Jesus being ressurrected, but Christianty spread because there was no body in the tomb. If someone stole the body, why were nearly all the Apostles willing to be killed for saying they'd seen Jesus risen? They were thousands of miles away from one another before phones and the internet and were being threaten, tortured, and murdered for their claim. Not one "broke" and said it was a lie to save themselves. It's because of the evidence that I believe in Jesus.
@normalman8447
@normalman8447 Ай бұрын
@@elixirforever007 no. We follow Christianity.
@colman_s
@colman_s Ай бұрын
300 years? Come on man.....
@arifbudiyanto2850
@arifbudiyanto2850 Ай бұрын
Just believe..... never think, cause Mystery.
@Noble_One
@Noble_One Ай бұрын
gossipals 🤣 Would've Should've Could've with no evidence.
@amnodean
@amnodean Ай бұрын
I actually thought they got the word "gossip" from 'gospel' 🤭🤭
@vidkit3595
@vidkit3595 Ай бұрын
No need for the rude comments brothers. Do not get caught up in uneccessary behaviour.
@Noble_One
@Noble_One Ай бұрын
​@@vidkit3595 calling a liar a liar is not misbehaving. that's actually part of deen. leave your personal feelings at the door. liberalism ( oh don't offend a liar) is not my religion.
@vidkit3595
@vidkit3595 Ай бұрын
@@Noble_One I am not a Liberal, but there is a different way of approaching people especially if you want them to see the truth and offending them in this way because some are liars, is not a good way of doing it.
@derek1734
@derek1734 Ай бұрын
Y’all complaining about how Paul only had his own testimony of Jesus, not realising Muhammad does the exact same thing at all times with no witnesses 😂😂😂🤦🏾‍♂️🤦🏾‍♂️
@KodaMoh42
@KodaMoh42 Ай бұрын
CHAIN OF NARRATION.
@danielburger1775
@danielburger1775 2 күн бұрын
The Bible and Quran were both written long after the events they describe. There is no "unbroken chain". Nor is there clear evidence that either book even puts the stories in the correct order. What if "Jesus" lived long BEFORE Moses, Solomon? What if the "jews" in the Gospels were not "Jews" in the modern sense, but "iewes" was just a contraction of "usurers"(money lenders)? What if the "Temple of Solomon" was actually a Christian Church? What if the "Babylonians" who "took away" the Israelites' holy relics were Muslims who viewed those "holy relics" as idolatory? What if the Temple was never destroyed? What if it's still standing today, because it was converted into a mosque? What if Moses was the First Muslim, whose Commandments are basically Islam? What if all of this was deliberately distorted centuries later?
@mrknowles1540
@mrknowles1540 Ай бұрын
No you don’t there was 1000’s at one point, you know when a Muslim is lying it lips are moving 👍
@llllllll1llllllll-0
@llllllll1llllllll-0 15 күн бұрын
Follow The QURAN
@hopelives7469
@hopelives7469 12 күн бұрын
The Koran was written 500 years after that.
@R33fs
@R33fs 8 күн бұрын
in is not written...it is revelated. and its is orally trasmitted (even now) before it is written ...and see, it is preserved for 14 century after that
@hopelives7469
@hopelives7469 8 күн бұрын
@@R33fs You say it is preserved, others say it has changed, some say many versions were destroyed. And it is claimed that the Bible has been changed despite the dead sea scrolls. Someone is lying. All that matters is the truth. The truth the way and the life.
@Klowcn
@Klowcn 26 күн бұрын
you don't need to read the bible to get into heaven Hebrews 4:12 he knows our intentions our intent is what matters for salvation and grace covers the rest hearing the bible is a blessing not a requirement
@Submission.
@Submission. Ай бұрын
Even our weak hadiths are more authentic than their gospels
@carolteasdale9795
@carolteasdale9795 6 күн бұрын
The original Hebrew Bible, the sacred scriptures of the Jewish faith, was written between 1200 and 165 BC. The Torah, the first five books of the Bible, were likely canonized during the Babylonian Exile in the 6th-5th century BCE, and the entire Hebrew Bible was complete by about 100 CE.
@habsa8855
@habsa8855 7 күн бұрын
Bible continues to be written to date. By people as they please. And then they attribute it to Jesus. 😂😅😂
@ElginLoh2010
@ElginLoh2010 Ай бұрын
Chain of narration? Ya, we all play the game before in the kindergarten, Teacher pass the message the first row of students and ask them pass down the message to the next row of students until the last row of students, we all know eventually the message that last row of students get is not the same as the teacher 😂
@silentsalt9199
@silentsalt9199 Ай бұрын
Always depends 😂 The chain can be correct or wrong
@ElginLoh2010
@ElginLoh2010 Ай бұрын
@@silentsalt9199 ya haha 🤣
@nurulsukri5143
@nurulsukri5143 24 күн бұрын
​@@silentsalt9199I'm not sure if you know this,but for your name to be included in this chain of naration you need to go under thorough study of the Quran and hadith,an extensive understanding of the Arabic language (the Nahu and Sorof)the extensive knowledge of the hadith and so on and so forth...even then you might not get your name in this chain due to one simple mistakes,such as forgetting the name of the imam(scholar) or forgetting something even simpler than that
@nurulsukri5143
@nurulsukri5143 24 күн бұрын
And you also had to have very good memories because you will be needed to memories their name from the person you got this hadith(mostly from scholar)all the to the tabi'in(the scholar after the sahabah) all the to sahabah and to the prophet Muhammad sallallahu Alaihi Wasallam himself
@silentsalt9199
@silentsalt9199 24 күн бұрын
@@nurulsukri5143 I have 0 idea on what you are trying to point out or what you are trying to say. I have my education on the Quran and the Hadith, many scholars as well. I go to conventions where actual scholars come, and I also take notes.
@muhammadah6850
@muhammadah6850 7 күн бұрын
There’s this Twitter account that claims hadeeth is unauthentic because it was written 200 years ago despite the fact I told him about chain of narration 😂😂 but typical paulism man can’t comprehend
@salman13
@salman13 18 күн бұрын
Mathew 28,:16-20 is a pro trinity verse and itself shows how unreliable the bible passage is
@Unknown-yv8tc
@Unknown-yv8tc 3 күн бұрын
☝️
@anthonymoubarak3736
@anthonymoubarak3736 Ай бұрын
Lol, 2 of the gospels were written by eyewitnesses the other two knew and worked with the Apostles. The gospels were compiled into the one book the bible later. Why on earth would you believe in another book written 700 years later lol. Try again!
@DeP-yu2sj
@DeP-yu2sj 17 күн бұрын
The bible was "written 300 years afyer Jesus" as in the earliest complete maniscropt of the old and new testament of the codex sinaiticus is from the 4th century. We still have mich earlier sourced. Plus, if the same argument were applied for ahadith,.we could disqualify all of them as maniscripts of Bukhari, Muslim, Ibn Majah, Abu Dawud etc. did not exist until hundreds of years after muhammad died and on top of that, were documenting ORAL TRADITION whereas we have much earlier written biblical sources.
@YourFavoriteSephardi
@YourFavoriteSephardi Ай бұрын
Question. Why isn't the Burning of the books ever talked about? I'd like to know more about the subject, since what I've heard and seen on here actually didn't say alot. I feel like the info may be biased so want to know from a Muslim. Thanks guys Shalom
@DanielAgache-fd7zm
@DanielAgache-fd7zm 22 күн бұрын
Circus for free!
@imm_salma
@imm_salma Ай бұрын
Alhamdulillah for being muslim ❤️☝🏼
@attilathehun0
@attilathehun0 Ай бұрын
Gospel of Mark in it's complete form came out in the 1st Century, but many years later after the crucifixion.
@tonymontanna9902
@tonymontanna9902 Ай бұрын
Even a weak hadith had stronger evidence than the all bibles
@normalman8447
@normalman8447 Ай бұрын
@@tonymontanna9902 😂 no
@ArchibaldHaddock-fn5re
@ArchibaldHaddock-fn5re 20 күн бұрын
Easy to try and discredit the bible when you never read it nor understand it.
@MrPurple1221
@MrPurple1221 Ай бұрын
Congratulations on getting a muslim to say that. Probably one of the camera crew.
@jameselturk4886
@jameselturk4886 24 күн бұрын
I have always known that you don't have to debunk any religion , religions do it for you. I pay attention to debates between them when they feel they are right and evertbody else is wrong. Funy, because the population of Christians and Muslims stays the same, and the good people and bad people are the same. Each debater thinks he is securing a place in heaven while there is not a single shred of evidence that one exists. These videos and the commentators use them as self indulgence to feel that their religion is right while everybody else is wrong or liars or ignorant. You can sit and watch them replacing reality with litereature, logic, linguistics and so on. What a waste of time and energy!
@sbshhddhhdhd5883
@sbshhddhhdhd5883 14 күн бұрын
@jameselturk4886 If you think it's a waste of time and energy, then why do you continue to watch it? Curious 👀
@killerxpro6566
@killerxpro6566 9 күн бұрын
Yeah , a pure book from heaven which has internal contradictions , which preaches about killing those who dont follow it 😂
@ramizacehaja3872
@ramizacehaja3872 Ай бұрын
And remember, Jesus, the son of Mary, said: "O Children of Israel! I am the messenger of Allah (sent) to you, confirming the Law (which came) before me, and giving Glad Tidings of a Messenger to come after me, whose name shall be Ahmad." But when he came to them with Clear Signs, they said, "this is evident sorcery!"  Chapter 5 The Table Spread سورة المائدة - Al-Maeda: Verse 116 وَإِذْ قَالَ اللَّهُ يَا عِيسَى ابْنَ مَرْيَمَ أَأَنْتَ قُلْتَ لِلنَّاسِ اتَّخِذُونِي وَأُمِّيَ إِلَٰهَيْنِ مِنْ دُونِ اللَّهِ ۖ قَالَ سُبْحَانَكَ مَا يَكُونُ لِي أَنْ أَقُولَ مَا لَيْسَ لِي بِحَقٍّ ۚ إِنْ كُنْتُ قُلْتُهُ فَقَدْ عَلِمْتَهُ ۚ تَعْلَمُ مَا فِي نَفْسِي وَلَا أَعْلَمُ مَا فِي نَفْسِكَ ۚ إِنَّكَ أَنْتَ عَلَّامُ الْغُيُوبِ And behold! Allah will say: "O Jesus the son of Mary! Didst thou say unto men, worship me and my mother as gods in derogation of Allah'?" He will say: "Glory to Thee! never could I say what I had no right (to say). Had I said such a thing, thou wouldst indeed have known it. Thou knowest what is in my heart, Thou I know not what is in Thine. For Thou knowest in full all that is hidden. 
@normalman8447
@normalman8447 Ай бұрын
Those saying the qur'an is preserved... Ask the goat who ate some of it, or Caliph Uthman and his qur'an burnings 😂😂😂
@rahilhabib
@rahilhabib Ай бұрын
Sounds like you know things all wrong. Please educate yourself correctly 😊
@normalman8447
@normalman8447 Ай бұрын
@@rahilhabib Sunan Ibn Majah 1944. It was narrated that 'Aishah said: “The Verse of stoning and of breastfeeding an adult ten times was revealed1, and the paper was with me under my pillow. When the Messenger of Allah died, we were preoccupied with his death, and a tame sheep came in and ate it.” You were saying?
@MH10GD
@MH10GD 22 күн бұрын
​@@normalman8447 Well, these hadith books were written 200 years after the orignal time. These books are pure hearsay.
@LatifatLawal-v1l
@LatifatLawal-v1l 17 күн бұрын
​@@normalman8447how many times do we say the Quran wasn't only preserved on books or parchment but also by heart. All the companions of the prophet were memorisers of the Quran. Same with the now Muslims. If all the whole Bible was to be thrown into the river. That's will be the end of the Bible. But the Quran? gives it maximum 2 days. A complete Quran will be produced, because it is memorised. You wouldn't see the beauty in this or admit. Don't go and look for more evidence or history about your bible but bring excerpt of an Hadith to make you feel better. Only of recent, radiocarbon was use on an old Quran and it was found to have existed during the prophet time himself. And that Quran was compared to what we have now and is same thing with the Quran we have now. No intelligent researcher will argue this, only Google resources and KZfaq users will disputes. Better you should learn more about your religion and it history. Not showcasing ignorance here.
@LatifatLawal-v1l
@LatifatLawal-v1l 17 күн бұрын
Caliph Uthman burnt the other different ways of reading the Quran(the qiraats, dialectal reading) and maintain the quaraish tribe dialect for unity( Eg, just like the varieties of English language, deciding to use the British English language) which was the initial one that was revealed. So you think, people during that period were fools and if the Quran were different, history won't capture it. Or the non Muslim then won't say anything. Those non Muslims then looking for ways to find fault in Islam, ready to criticize. Try again later. Give us the reason for different versions of your bible. The original aramaic, Jesus preached in? cos that is what only make sense and serve as a solid evidence. If you read even Hebrew versions of the Bible, you will still spots the clear differences. But you don't know of such things about your bible but come here to spread lies on what you don't know but saw on KZfaq. We are tired of explaining same time over and over again. Won't say anything anymore.
@mbryson2899
@mbryson2899 Ай бұрын
George Washington just told me that you are _both_ wrong. I didn't believe him, but then Abraham Lincoln and Larry Flynt both backed him up.
@jimmyfuentes3914
@jimmyfuentes3914 28 күн бұрын
First off the christian is wrong. The NEW TESTAMENT was written within 150 years of Jesus's life. The earliest being roughly 20-30 years. So both the christian and muslim are wrong.
@sunamoina8576
@sunamoina8576 Ай бұрын
BROTHER HASHIM, IT'S TRUE THAT, HADITH WEEE WRITTEN AFTER 200 YEARS OF RASOOLULLAH SAW. THERE WERE MANY BOOKS WRITTEN in the time of Sahaba.
@bobxbaker
@bobxbaker Ай бұрын
i mean that's factually untrue, the bible is a compilation of many books put together. this is just a reference to the nicene creed in which a particular bible was codified that got the most traction and is seen as the most accurate. just as the quran was compiled by abu bakr, it doesn't mean that is when it first emerged, that is just the first time it's been officially codified.
@peteodonnell6219
@peteodonnell6219 Ай бұрын
Records are in the Vatican for their schools who did all the translations. the later translations all recorded also. The reason folk don't know them, is because they are hundreds of thousands of people, over the 2k years.
@BilboBoris
@BilboBoris Ай бұрын
And yet so many conflict with each other and so many new versions exist. It's pretty insane how all over the place Christianity is. What with all the Roman pagan influence.
@jeffreyguarchaj-lopez4359
@jeffreyguarchaj-lopez4359 8 күн бұрын
Yea but Luke researched about Jesus and believed
@adrianmcdonald84
@adrianmcdonald84 18 күн бұрын
The chain of narration doesnt exist...according to Muslim Scholars including Yasir Quadi. Listen yo discussion between him and Muhamed Hihab. Theres no mention anywhere of Islam,Muslim,Allah, Muhammed befor 9th /10th century.
@yeddy_da_deddy8539
@yeddy_da_deddy8539 10 күн бұрын
Bro why was noting down hadith banned soon after the Prophet?
@LohaManus-ed3tb
@LohaManus-ed3tb Ай бұрын
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
@hopelives7469
@hopelives7469 12 күн бұрын
Does the Koran not say the old testament is also the word of Allah and cannot be corrupted?
@RovePaths
@RovePaths 28 күн бұрын
Both are exaggerated books. Just look how a story from a friend is enhanced after a fishing trip. Now multiply that over a couple of hundred years. There you go. That friend fought and killed a shark.
@Heheimtheone
@Heheimtheone Ай бұрын
True
@Sufferd666
@Sufferd666 Ай бұрын
Luke and Mark do not sound very middle east. Why is there a translation? of names
@Allahuma.sali.ala.muhammad.
@Allahuma.sali.ala.muhammad. Ай бұрын
There is no Luke or Mark, those are random names, the writers are anonymous lol
@Sufferd666
@Sufferd666 Ай бұрын
@@Allahuma.sali.ala.muhammad. same reason why Jesus is portrayed as a white man?
@aethxathr9327
@aethxathr9327 Ай бұрын
@@Sufferd666Jesus was born in the Middle East, obviously he wouldn’t be a white man. Those that say he is are perverting the bible in the most disgusting way possible.
@khalid6539
@khalid6539 15 күн бұрын
Mashalah brother hashim I live in the side of Allah ,may Allah protect you
@drcheekyisback
@drcheekyisback Ай бұрын
Guy has got eyes on the back of his head but is still blind to the truth 😂
@carolteasdale9795
@carolteasdale9795 6 күн бұрын
This Muslim is speaking nonsense. The original Hebrew Bible, the sacred scriptures of the Jewish faith, was written between 1200 and 165 BC. The Torah, the first five books of the Bible, were likely canonized during the Babylonian Exile in the 6th-5th century BCE, and the entire Hebrew Bible was complete by about 100 CE.
@g9n646
@g9n646 Ай бұрын
Not even weak hadith, fabricated hadith has stronger claim 😅 people know who the narrator, how and when it was fabricated, how was the profile/character of the fabricator
@drdhakan87
@drdhakan87 22 күн бұрын
I tell something a work to someone in the morning and by the time i leave, i hear a whole new story being told back to me These guys think 300 years on, whatever Jesus said was passed on perfectly with no chain or documents
@idodivirgin
@idodivirgin 5 күн бұрын
Only in Christianity kū́rios translated into English means god 😆🤣🤣🤣
@Soulwrite7
@Soulwrite7 9 күн бұрын
Bad faith. Most new testament books were written in the first century. In fact it is a common criticism of Islam that their scripture was written 200 years after Mahmud, such that some radicals would suggest that Mahmud didn't exist at all. By comparison even atheists have conceded the evidence for the crucifixion happening, due to the abundance of evidence. There is also a decent idea of what early Christians believed due to the documentation of especially the Romans at the time. We know early Christians saw Christ as divine, had a ceremony involving communion which offended the Romans as 'mock cannibalism', they would rescue infants abandoned to exposure, and refused to worship Caesar (for which they were killed). This was during the life-times of many apostles and within decades of the last of their deaths, so either they failed extraordinarily to communicate the message given, or the early church is somewhat foundational and truthful. Paul's letters to the churches occurred wile some apostles still lived without conflict between them, this clearly validates Paul's interpretation and writings.
@user-nl5ct5kv8x
@user-nl5ct5kv8x 12 сағат бұрын
Islam was started by the Catholic Church
@aneesharyan3910
@aneesharyan3910 Ай бұрын
If Muslims can trust prophet who heard voices in his mind why can’t Christian’s believe Apostle who saw visions sent by God ?
Childish Christian Loses It All | Abbas | Speakers Corner
30:05
CHOCKY MILK.. 🤣 #shorts
00:20
Savage Vlogs
Рет қаралды 29 МЛН
The Giant sleep in the town 👹🛏️🏡
00:24
Construction Site
Рет қаралды 19 МЛН
🤯🔥JW Christians Shows up at Shaykh Uthman's House..Then This Happened❗
33:37
A Muslim Man Enters a Church - They Laughed
39:53
Sabeel Ahmed
Рет қаралды 1,7 МЛН
Christian Man Is On A Slippery Slope | Hashim | Speakers Corner
44:56
Christianity and Islam Explained || Comparison Religions ||
11:42
Just Religion
Рет қаралды 849 М.
Many American Women Interested In Islam || STREET DAWAH WITH "THE WARNER"
8:13
I Am “THE WARNER”
Рет қаралды 5 МЛН