May he can handle what will get in the path of his.

May Zeus guide him to find a good reason to believe in Jesus.

I agree but I think he still thinks he’s a good person, so none of this really matters to him.

Hum.. i mostly watched the US and didnt see any problem with the US version

@KerriDale yeah as long as the brainwashing sticks then I guess it works lol

@@TheBox225 how is that brainwashing??

Thank you Paul Eastham. Please consider our Ambassadors' Academy. You may feel more courageous after 5 days of intense training. For more information please visit academy.livingwaterseu.com. God bless.

Whaaaaaa??!!

LWE, how much American money is £134?

@@slomofome14 they should charge less of even free if it helps in spreading the gospel but I'm not here to judge.. maybe they have good reasons

@@LivingWatersEurope 134 quid to memorize three or four infantile non sequitor questions ? coining it there euro ray.

@@Thuhglegend27 what they are trying to say is that theories are taught to be fact because the theory sounds logical regardless of proof if the theory is even true. which is why most atheist hang onto the term "scientific theory" like that is suppose to make the theory true because the word "scientific" is thrown into the term but it is still a theory regardless. There ia a big difference between scientific theory and scientific fact and this upcoming gemeration is more incline to believe a theory over fact because some things cant be proven and the theory only sounds like it makes more sense over fact but that doesn't change the facts.

@@Thuhglegend27 i understand that but you can cram as many facts into a theory all you want but that doesn't make the theory true which is why its called a theory and not a fact or "scientific" theory vs "scientific" fact. no different then putting historical facts and places in a fictional novel or movie, doesn't mean the novel or movie is entirely true. take the big bang theory for instance. i just finished a 2 week debate with a gentleman over KZfaq comments solely over the big bang. His claim was that since the Big bang theory is a scientific theory then it should be accepted as true. he keep tossing up scientific theory like it means its a fact until we broke down the theory of the big bang which relied upon the beginning where the theory states that a before the "singularity" occurred there was no time, space, or matter and that we don't know how the singularity could even exist. we went over different websites and wiki pages discussing the evidences of this and remotely it boiled down to there is no evidence that a singularity is possible and is only 'believed" to of happened because it sounds like the only logical way for the evidence to exist but ultimately is still a theory that is assumed to of happened. so scientifically a scientific theory will always be assumed to be true but it is still assumed making it be believed to be true. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_theory if you read through the description of scientific theory, its pretty obvious that it means whether or not a theory can be tested to be proven a theory is simply "accepted" as true ultimately tossing it into the scientific theory category because people believe the theory to be true. still a belief it would just be a scientific belief. still doesn't make something true just means something is believed to be true

​@@Thuhglegend27 google definition speculation: the forming of a theory or conjecture without firm evidence. i never said science was like a novel but a theory can most definitely be like one. yes the big bang is explainable with a "theory" but not all "theories" are true. the big bang itself is pure speculation. the big bang is based off a theory that involves a singularity that supposedly contains infinite mass and infinite density. how does anyone know that this singularity contains infinite mass and infinite density? simple, they don't know, which is why its still a theory. no one has ever witness a singularity or tested a singularity. its a theory no matter how scientific it may be. its just a theory that is put together by scientific laws that is speculated as the only way such a thing could be possible. doesn't mean its true.

@@Thuhglegend27 i understand what you are trying to say but to go as far as saying "wasting your time or mine" only hinders the point of the discussion and only encourages someone to just accept any answer that someone else believes to be true based off of whatever evidence they believe supports the theory they are claiming to be true regardless if the theory happens to be true or not. The wiki page for scientific theory cleary states: "In circumstances not amenable to experimental testing, theories are evaluated through principles of abductive reasoning." Then in the wiki page for abductive reasoning it states: "yields a plausible conclusion but does not positively verify it." No matter the theory, if it cant be tested and only relies upon reasonings that clearly cant verify it to be true but is accepted as true without verification then it is simply believed to be true making it a belief regardless of the terminology used. Even with evidence proof is going to be proof and any theory can be concluded based off of whatever evidence supports the theory but if it isnt proven then it has to be believed to be true in order for it to be accepted. You can say "accepted as true" if you want but that still means someone believes something to be true. Just simple terminology which is probably why people dont like it to be called scientific belief over scientific theory. A theory is a theory regardless of how you spin it. Scientific or not it remains a theory no matter what the evidence says if it isnt proven. Which is why tons of atheist point to christians and demand for proof of God but when the script is flipped they get upset because they either realise they themselves are holding onto a belief or are using whatever they think disproves God for a reason to not believe in God. Thanks for the conversation by the way but no offence i know you mean well but learning is never a waste of time no matter how someone learns something and everytime, whether it is said to me or i read said to someone else, just telling someone that "its a waste or your or mine time." is technically a cop out or a insult to the person it is being said to and only shows the person saying it either doesn't know enough to actualy have a conversation about it and isnt willing to learn more about the topic being discussed with the person they are discussion it with or it is saying to the person its being told to that they are to stupid or ignorant to actually learn something. I didn't take it as an insult from you but i see it a lot everywhere else and usually is meant as an insult so for future reference for people who arem't me(i have thick skin and am smart enough handle my own) and you are wanting someone to see your viewpoint you might actaully want to discuss the topic instead of saying its a waste of time. Some people are actauily wanting to learn while others are simple trying to stur up trouble (trolls) sadly. Again thanks for the reply sorry for the little rant. I like to learn and enjoy a thought provoking conversation and dont accept a conversation to where i can learn something as a waste of time.

@@Thuhglegend27 awesome conversation we are having. Thank you for that so to continue on. Info on scientific theory wiki page: "whereas in science it describes an explanation that has been tested and widely *accepted* as valid" Google definition of accepted: "generally believed or recognized to be valid or correct" If science deals with facts then nothing would have to be "accepted as true" but certain things have to be believed as true to further science along which still makes something a scientific belief since clearly the truth doesnt always get verified. You wouldnt have to accept something as true if it is verified as true thus simple knowing something is true making it fact. Which is why it is called a scientific theory and not a scientific fact. Scientifically speaking we don't ever see anything pop into existence. The device you are using didn't simply grow out of the ground and become the device you are using. it was designed with a function in mind. You look at a building and its clear that someone built it.. you see a painting and know someone painted it. You see a car and see how it functions pretty obvious someone designed the car to function the way it does. Scientifically nothing hasnt beem created in this universe. It take someone to build the building it took someone to paint the painting and it took someone to make you which was your parents and someone had to make them so naturally in my opinion using scientific theories of natural laws you cant get something from nothing and everything came from somewhere then this universe which clearly has a design in mind for it to function the way it does was design which i believe to have beem designed by God. It makes the most sense. To add to this I've had several paranormal experiences that has proved to me that the spiritual does indeed exist and i have others like my wife or the people around to back up the same things ive experienced because they have experienced them also. so i know spirits exist. Hey you seem like a intelligent indivual and i would to further correspond with you until you dont feel like talking to me. If you are interested it would be easier for me to talk with you if we use the friend chat feature since it use my phone mainly to talk with people on youtube and using the chat feature is easier then havinh to load up the video everytime i want to respond. You can delete me at anytime you want just click on this link kzfaq.info_contact?c=hWlESbfuJt3HHEHOfOjPN9nSvOPNQg

Ryan Hollingsworth In sweden too. They showed animatörs films of monkeys and Neanderthals and things and brainwashed us. I was the only one who said I believed God created us and earth. They show NO respect to Christians at all. When we had religion they gave us tons of texts and papers about Islam, Hinduism and Buddhism but not much about Christianity. And they only told us about catholic saints and some history and NOTHING about the real biblical Christian lifestyle. But they told us much more about Islam and Buddhism and Hinduism.

A Big Bang universe is a universe that has a beginning, which is consistent with the Bible. If it had a beginning then it must have had a beginner. The interviewer did a good job explaining that with regard to the cosmological argument.

It's the same in the UK I lived 33 years in darkness not knowing about jesus but never actually questioning what I'd not been told. science is the religion of today people what to believe scientists Don't Lie. but they get things wrong all the time but still call it's science. jesus opened my eyes 2 years ago he changed my heart & mind I thank him everyday praise God

Absolutely...the system at work, which will always be atheist and wicked.

Systems of education shouldn’t be based around any specific religion because those all come down to personal beliefs and opinions

Śūnyatā ....“linked to it”? With all do respect, God is not a it. God is a heavenly person , who created us all in his image.that is what the Bible teaches n the older man was making a clear distinction in sound doctrine to the young man about the origin of mankind n the universe. What u are describing is pantheism n that would contradict biblical Christian theology

@@aleksdraws1520 Thank you. I was referring to the unknown of our reality, for which we feel excitement at first, then fear when we're older. I wouldn't use "it" for the conscious being responsible of creation. Maybe my syntax was wrong, I live in France. I too believe in the Bible teachings and in Jesus Christ our Lord. I wouldn't argue about the meaning of everything, from my point of view in space/time, though. We're all breathing and seeking why, this perspective is enough to amaze me.

Śūnyatā the gospel can still be preached in secular Europe also. We humans are initially spiritual beings and knows there’s a God without them realizing it.

@@fernandocuriel124 You're absolutely right, I live near Paris and there are a lot of riots right now against our government & the oppression of the E.U on the middle class citizens. I see more and more people that can finally see clear finding their way to Jesus Christ and it fills my heart with incommensurable joy even though the situation is chaotic and only getting worse. The children of God still stand up for their conviction, even though the days are dark. It inspires me to share the gospel to anyone who has an ear to hear, I pray the Lord everyday that He makes me worthy of bearing the Truth to my fellow brothers who deeply need it.

Śūnyatā AMEN!

which clearly shows how much higher God’s mind is than man’s 😁 the creation reflects the creator!

Bárbara Gomes Save your breath your prayers do nothing! Maybe your prayers can stop mass shooters!!!

Because this is His world and He can do what He wishes. And how do you know He doesn't stop billions of bad things from happening ever day. Maybe the reason you don't see more bad things is because He did stop them from happening. And if nothing bad ever happens then we would not know how much we need Him, we wouldn't know "bad" so we wouldn't see any need for Him. When we see the bad then we see that there is a need for God.

For instance, while not science directly but evidence more-so. Jesus pretty much always performed miracles that many people were a witnesses too. This can be backed up with so many accounts from that region as well. One major one, would be his own brother James who pretty much despised Jesus until his resurrection. Namely, because his brother claimed to be perfect and appeared to be! Could you imagine how much scrutiny you'd have against a sibling who claimed to be perfect? James gave up his disdain for Jesus when the greatest miracle (his resurrection) came to pass. Not to mention all of the things Jesus did to the day (prophesy found in the 70 weeks of Daniel) and the hundreds of prophesies foretold in the Old Testament of a coming savior mostly found in the book of Isaiah(written 800 years before Jesus was born) and other prophesies suggested a coming savior all over the old testament. These prophesies explain why the three Wise-men Kings knew where and when Jesus was born, because they were students of the book of Isaiah and Daniel's 70 weeks.

If you search for proof of miracles, search in the orthodox christian church.

Yes there are evidences to prove that the Lord Jesus performed many miracles. For example, the Lord's first miracle which He performed in Cana was witnessed by John and many people considered as eyewitnesses. Visit this blog controversyextraordinary.com for clearer and better understanding brother. And about the Lord rose from the dead watch the debate Michael Licona and Shabir Ally for the evidences. God bless you.

We have 4 detailed eye witness accounts each confirming each other along with over 1500 years of documentation with the exact details of the death and resurrection of christ would happen(prophecy). Also archeology has validated the authenticity of the scriptures contents as well.

There are numerous. One evidence in particular is powerful. This is a historical evidence: in particular is the early witness of Jesus' followers. They were severely persecuted and suffered and many were martyred for their faith, insisting upon the Risen Lord. "Group hallucinations" will not excuse this fact that many claimed to have seen Him. People are not willing to suffer agonizing death and mistreatment for a fable or lie. The fact that the Church exists at all is a Testament to The Risen Christ

Amen: well said!

Yes, Jesus was God. John 1:1 and John 1:14 says He was God. In John 8:58, "Truly, truly, I say to you, before Abraham was, I am." Jesus claimed to be God by saying that He was I AM, the name I AM was used only by God, the only other place the name I AM was used was when God was speaking with Moses in the burning bush in Exodus 3: 13-14. That was why the Jews were wanting to stone Jesus, because He was claiming to be the I AM, the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob.

Denying a creator exists does not mean he doesn't exist. I think that's what they were getting at. I could be wrong. I get what you're saying about the loophole thing, but God's plan from the very beginning was to send his son on our behalf, so this kind of negates your argument a bit. Even if I was an atheist, which I'm not. This is talked about in the Old Testament over and over(70 Weeks of Daniel, Genesis, Isaiah and Enoch). All of which are absolutely known to have been written before Jesus was born in a time that absolutely can be proven without any doubt whatsoever. The names themselves from Adam up to Noah in the Bible give a prophecy like this: Adam(Man) Seth(Appointed) Enosh(Mortal) Kenan(Sorrow) Mehalal(God) Jared(Shall Come Down) Enoch(Teaching) Methuselah(His Death Shall Bring) Lamech(the Desparing) Noah(Rest). I should also mention, this is the Hebrew translation, which is why so many Christians believe it to be the original language Adam was given by God. In the eyes of a Christian God does not make mistakes, he is perfect, he knew when the right time was for Jesus to come to have the greatest impact and save the most lives for their benefit. In the letter Paul wrote to the Ephesians around 50AD he says that "God sees you and I as his greatest treasure. An inheritance to him." The greatest work and creation he ever made was you from God's perspective. Isn't the idea of that incredible to consider? Imagine if a president or prime minister genuinely felt this way about all people in their land. Would this not be a leader worth following? Genuinely caring whether you live or die in war or if your knee healed after the accident. God appreciates each of us individually and wants to spend eternity in our presence, not the other way around. Hope that helps you to understand why people want to believe in God. I do care about you as well. Which is why I sent you this message. I could not forgive myself if I found out that in the end I could have been the one that helped you understand God a bit, but I felt too busy to say anything to you and no one else ever did either. God bless you friend, we're all family here on this world. I hope you consider the true God of the Bible and not what people change him in to.

Hi Hank. What would change your mind? God bless John

Living Waters Europe real proofs, may change my mind. But right now i have no proof about the existence of God.

@@ottomann5294 what would you consider real proofs?

Living Waters Europe something I can see, touch, hear, taste or smell, tangible proofs, I don't believe in something just because people say so.

Living Waters Europe still waiting for an answer...

I'm struggling to see your point here. I'd like to respond, but I'm not sure of your specific intent. Are you saying Jesus is made up or that his second coming already happened? I agree there are parallels, but the story of betrayal and conquering is not exclusive to the two. I think it would be dangerous to think that. For certain, Jesus will come again. It is not Caesar. Just like Nero was not the anti-christ. This is dangerous and can keep people from being saved. Unless you have absolute proof, I would not be spreading these statements around, because no where in scripture does it say that Jesus return would be an empire, a religion, or a political leader. It says he will come down exactly as he left(Acts 1:11). On the mount, with the appearance of a human. And all will know who he is because of his power. Be careful and study the scripture more. If you're not a Christian I could see how this is not clear. The Bible as a whole, is a lot to take in. It requires a studious person with thousands of hours to piece it together.

@@speakersforthedead4455 Speaker for the Dead. Orson Scott Card, sequel of Ender's Game. I've read it. The piggies return as trees.

@@justinlambell-marshall-bla8800 That's correct. Those two books are among my favorites of all time. It recognizes that we as humans do not understand the intentions of others, but believe they should conform to us, before we should conform to others. Ender sought truth and diligence and to understand before judging. I agree with the idea of a Speaker For The Dead who speaks truth, even if it hurts to hear it. Also, those who are unsaved are dead to the afterlife, and those prophets who came before us are dead, but spoke to us of the future. For all of these reasons, I created my channel with that name.

@@speakersforthedead4455 If you are "Speaker for the Dead", do you speak for the millions slaughtered by Christianity?

@@justinlambell-marshall-bla8800 If they were real Christians they would not have killed millions. 2 Corinthians 11:14 "No wonder, for even Satan disguises himself as an angel of light." Any one can call themselves a Christian, but it is their actions that show the truth. If you're referring to the Catholic church and their crusade, I agree, that is not Christ-like. They are not really Christian since Pope's throughout history claim to be the embodiment of Jesus and say their words are God's words, even if it does not agree with God. Never is a real Christian doing what you say, only false Christians. I speak instead for the millions of Christians slaughtered by others and the rest of the people who are victimized by Satan and his cohorts. Does that make sense? Jesus is the messiah prophesied in Isaiah to exact detail. A book written 800 years before he was even born. Even the place he was born. Since babies don't choose where to be born, this should impress you, at least a little bit.

You cannot call anything absurd or wrong. Because if we just a product of evolution than that means that what we think of truth or morality is simply relative. That absolutes are not real. Thus your claim is simply as real as my claim cause there is not absolute truth. What one man sees as right is as valid as another man calling it wrong.

@@enriqueortiz131 You are brainwashed.

So, saying I'm guilty of the same thing as you makes me a dishonest person? Come on now. We all have broken laws, whether they are from the Bible or your local political affiliations. I believe their intent of expressing the broken laws was to show that denying that the universe was created doesn't mean there is not a creator. Since we can not choose how we were created in the first place. We can only consider the options. Science may talk like they know "for sure", but when it comes down to it, it is still a guess with major implications if wrong. Do you realize that historically Christians are despised and often persecuted (many times with their life) for even saying they believe in God? It's not some pleasure or hidden agenda to tell you. It's the opposite. I want you to go to Heaven because I don't want you to go to Hell, there's no other reason to die for my belief and tell you. I care about you. That's all. You can be mad, but what if I am right and never told you? I'd be the worst person ever. I might as well be Satan because it has the same result to not share some things with you. I believe God cares about you. I'll put it this way, my life is worth a great deal to me, I have kids and a lot I enjoy, but yours is worth more to me than mine, because I'd die for you if only to give you more time to decide to believe God exists. I believe God wants to show him self to you, if only you'd ask "God, show me if you are real?" He'll show you he cares. It may not be how you want to be shown, but you must be willing to be wrong about what you currently think about him.

The question can't make the person feel bad if they aren't doing wrong. Try again

@@williamgullett5911 Have you ever had impure thoughts? God does not like that, shame on you. Is the interviewer a saint? No impure thoughts? This is hilarious.

troll

@@christrevelation4043 how am I being a troll?

I think a majority of his moral standard is false in terms of how he interpreted the commandments. If you're looking into Protestantism i'd look at someone like William Lane Craig. If you're looking into Catholicism I'd look at Bishop Barron and the youtube channel Classical Theist. :)

@@tengojuevos907 Of course your a troll fool! get your lying ass out here.. ye are of your father the devil

@@Thuhglegend27 Diabolus iam iam perdidit.

The truth there is that we hane no relaible evidence that a god exist, that jesus existed, that jesus eas define, that any of the accounts of his life are accurate or any of the things he was claimed to have said ever passed anyone's lips. And that doesn't even touch on the absurdety of the rest of the bible. If you are intersted in truth, you should know that you can not reasonable take the central claims, supernatural or otherwise, in the bible as true.

Have the bible, the arqueology, the inteligenty design