Sigma 30mm f/1.4 DC DN 'C' lens review...tested on Canon EF-M and Sony E

Рет қаралды 178,191

Күн бұрын

It's going to be exceptionally rare for me to do this but I'm testing one of Sigma's mirrorless lenses on two different camera systems for y'all: a Sony E-mount 24mp camera, and Canon's EOS M6 Mark ii, with its crazy 32.5mp sensor. This should be interesting!
Find it here (Amazon affiliate link) (Be sure to get the right lens for your camera system):
geni.us/Sigma30mmCanonEFM
All pictures taken by me on Canon EOS M6 Mark ii, Sony a5100, and Sony a7R II cameras.
Support me on Patreon! / christopherfrost
Equipment I use for making these reviews and other videos:
Equipment I use to make my videos (Amazon affiliate links):
Canon EOS R5: geni.us/CanonEOSR5Body
Canon EF-RF Adaptor: geni.us/CanonEFtoRF
Sigma 50mm f/1.4 'Art': geni.us/Sigma50mm14Art
Canon RF 35mm f/1.8 IS STM: geni.us/CanonRF35mm18Macro
Marumi Fit and Slim CPL Filter: geni.us/MarumiFitSlim77
AudioTechnica AT2020USB+ Microphone: geni.us/AT2020USBPlusMic
Rode Smartlav+ Microphone: geni.us/RodeSmartLavalierPlus
Rode SC3 adapter: geni.us/RodeSC3MicAdaptor
Zoom H1n Recorder: geni.us/ZoomH1nMiniRecorder
DJI Mini 2 Drone: geni.us/DJIMini2FlyMore
Music:
'Opportunity Walks', Kevin MacLeod (incompetech.com)
Licensed under Creative Commons: By Attribution 3.0
creativecommons.org/licenses/b...

Пікірлер: 222

@johnpilling5937 4 жыл бұрын

Chris, can't remember if I ever bothered to put a comment before so if not then here it is. After a close family member passed away and left some money to me I decided to update my kit completely to a different system, from the very old and well used one I have had for many many years. All the four lenses I bought were based on all the reviews I watched on YOUR channel and were invaluable in my decision making. Your vids are simple to understand, informative and offer excellent comparisons and no doubt I will still be watching them even if I'm not due for any purchases in the foreseeable future. Thanks and keep up the great work. I wish you all the very best for the coming New Year.

@TarekAlShawwa 4 жыл бұрын

i'm confused about the comments regarding the lenses external appearance, I think it's a beautiful and minimalist lens design

@willstone8313 3 жыл бұрын

I’ll second that sentiment! It has a minimalistic beauty-almost Scandanavian or German. I love Sigma’s aesthetics

@DanieleGiannattasio 3 жыл бұрын

They make some of the best looking lenses

@acidtears Жыл бұрын

it screams plastic & rubber. no soul in the design. minimalist yes, but it doesn't fit the with the complex look of cameras. Nikon's primes for example are similarly ugly.

@tridinh1011 5 ай бұрын

It looks cheap and feels cheap. It affects the feel of the photographer alot

@lionheart4424 4 ай бұрын

@@tridinh1011 I will respectfully disagree. I own this lens and I do not find it bothering my photography. It obviously does not look nor feel premium, thats for the Art series that goes beyond the $800 mark. But it certainly does not feel cheap, and aesthetically goes well with small cameras. And I like my stuff looking good too, I own Fuji lenses. I have Canon glass and I've had Sony glass too and some of their cheaper offerings do feel cheap compared to this Sigma lens.

@nahueljo 3 жыл бұрын

Goddamn. After watching like 5 reviews of this lense from vloggers, I wasn't expecting such detailed and technical review. Fantastic.

@TJuice1986 4 жыл бұрын

I’ve been waiting for this review from you for almost a year now. Best review on KZfaq!!

@Design475 4 жыл бұрын

Great review, I was waiting for this one! Glad to see the ef-m lens comparison :)

@daniel635biturbo 4 жыл бұрын

Hi Christopher, I would really like to see a behind the scenes video when you are testing lenses. Some things I can understand, but lighting and size / length to test chart would be good to know. Is the test chart some print you have done yourself ? It would be awesome to be able to replicate your test at home, and compare old vintage lenses to the new stuff. The consistency and repeatability is very nice, and you are building up a very nice catalogue. Keep up the good work, you are great inspiration!

@DerrickWade43 4 жыл бұрын

A must have lens for apsc shooters imo. i have it myself and has been a very useful/versatile lens for me. it's great for travel, street, and portrait photography.

@zefa3867 4 жыл бұрын

I've been waiting for this review for ages!

@JediBadAtValo 2 ай бұрын

This is by far the best lens review I've seen.

@robertcudlipp3832 4 жыл бұрын

Christopher, thanks for another excellent review. All the recent YT and written reviews of this lens have been very positive. It needs to be remembered that when this lens would have been in its design stages, its target market would have been the Sony a6000 series. As such, its performance with the 20mp sensor is perhaps a little fairer. Given the dearth of native glass for the Sony apsc range, it is my understanding that this lens has, and continues, to sell very strongly to Sony apsc owners and now perhaps Canon and limited other mirrorless owners.

@theizza68 4 жыл бұрын

Thanks to sigma, the Sony e mount is striving. And now the Canon m mount is too.

@geopapa80 4 жыл бұрын

at last.. thnx for the review! The lower than expected corner performance might be due to field curvature as you have a completely level subject. Real life photos of landscapes at f8 are incredibly sharp in the corners too.

@caleblatreille8224 4 жыл бұрын

i own all three Sigma DC DN e-mount lenses, the 16mm and 56mm are both absolutely wonderful but i find myself not packing this one along as much, and kind of miss my old Sony 35f1.8 (sadly stolen). the autofocus is indeed noticeably weaker than all those others, and the fringing is quite bad. i was curious if this Canon update might improve anything and it seems like autofocus is where it should be, if no other areas. thanks for the continued excellence and consistency in your reviews!

@chancetalkscameras 8 ай бұрын

Awesome review and I totally agree. I've had this thing since 2018 (when I first bought my a6k) and it's great!

@fallryan 4 жыл бұрын

Thanks for doing all the hard work on these reviews, always a watch when they show up in my sub feed. I’d love this in a Fuji mount, doesn’t seem likely so here’s hoping the upcoming Viltrox 33 1.4 is as good as the 85 was and as cheap as the rumors say.

@tjkrueger2655 4 жыл бұрын

Honestly, that Viltrox will likely perform at least as well as this one... image quality and bokeh aren't that exciting. And at least the Viltrox will have an aperture ring.

@giorgiocigno3048 4 жыл бұрын

Hi! Is your sharpness chart DIY or is it available somewhere? Watching your lovely videos I came to a conclusion I need to have one to check any Sony lens I will buy:)

@baconpalacio 3 жыл бұрын

Hi, good morning! Can you enable in camera corrections for this lense?

@terriplays1726 4 жыл бұрын

I own this lens for the Sony A6300 and I do fully agree with your review. I was blown away when I saw that it perfectly resolves fine features like hair down to the pixel sensors at F1.4. I think it also does so mid-frame, only the very corners are weak. On the other hand the barrel distortion pretty much kills it for anything that is supposed to have straight lines. Architecture photography is pretty much impossible. At least in Capture One I was not able to get a satisfactory correction for the barrel distortion. For some reason, even Sigma's own 16mm F1.4 seems to have less distortion while being much wider!

@xlxljyxy 4 жыл бұрын

How does this lens compare to Canon ef-m 32mm 1.4, especially on Eos M6 mark ii?

@stefpix 4 жыл бұрын

Thank you. What’s your opinion compared to the new Sony 16-55 zoom at 2.8 and compared to the Sony 28mm f2?

@WiwatChang 4 жыл бұрын

Christopher, please compare this with the EF-M 32mm 1.4. Happy New Year !

@ddesai1080 4 жыл бұрын

How you compare this against the canon 32mm f1.4?

@HarrisonChong 2 жыл бұрын

How do you feel about this lens vs the Viltrox 33mm f1.4? I currently have the Viltrox but am wondering if re-selling and buying the new Sigma for Fuji would give some improvement!

@joaovieira3487 3 жыл бұрын

can you do a review for this crop lens for full frame camaras please? i use this and i think its the same quality even dough is 10mp insted of 24mp because of the conversion

@omribenbenisty 4 жыл бұрын

Can you please test the Yongnuo 35mm f/1.4 for Canon EF?🙏🏻 Would be much appreciated

@godofhope 4 жыл бұрын

Just a honest review not like all the other overhype on KZfaq. This is a reasonably priced lens and the performance is just about right. But nothing spectacular or out of this world.

@adrenalfilms 4 жыл бұрын

Did you compared it to canon 32mm 1.4 efm?

@arisgemino 4 жыл бұрын

This is the review I have waited for

@ayayoutuber 4 жыл бұрын

how does it compare to a canon nifty fifty with a Viltrox adapter?

@galihseno 4 жыл бұрын

If I have to choose 1 lens for canon apsc, what lens on the market should I buy. I want versatility, more bokeh and light than kit lens, and have a good price? Thank you

@thedondeluxe6941 4 жыл бұрын

I think Crystal Pepsi might be the most 90's thing to ever exist. It sure was a fun and exciting time, haha :-)

@secretcowcat6341 3 жыл бұрын

If AF works on canon, does it follow that eye af also works well?

@abdulazizalsubaie7501 4 жыл бұрын

Hey which best for canon600d Canon EF-S 55-250mm f/4-5.6 IS STM or Canon EF 70-300mm f/4-5.6 IS USM

@avikmajumdar1791 3 жыл бұрын

Really enjoy your content and find it very informative and practical. Did you ever face issues with the autofocus during photography.? I keep hearing on line that it only nails the focus 70 percent of times and 30 percent of times you are left with major focus issues.

@saifaldin_ 3 жыл бұрын

It did have focusing problems when it was just released, but has been somewhat resolved with a firmware update. Newer Sony bodies should also improve it’s AF performance; closer to, but not at the level of Sony native lenses.

@danutbanut2476 4 ай бұрын

I bought this lens 2 months ago. The build quality is actually very premium. It does the job very well and everything works great. Anyone who wonders if they should buy it or not, I say go for it. I recommend it! I bought it for my Sony A6000 as a 35mm replacer, because 35mm lenses are way to expensive... let's be honest. This 30mm was way less expensive than any 35mm available and all the less expensive 35mm's options are only with F1.8. This Sigma 30mm has F1.4

@borgdylan 6 ай бұрын

How's the sunstars on this lens? Its transmissibility seems to be better than Canon's 32mm (as seen on a video by Todd Dominey) and I might buy it for night street photography to accompany the 16mm.

@philipmatthew5209 4 жыл бұрын

Hope you can tell us about sigma 16mm f1.4 for EF-M

@henrykarukuru 8 күн бұрын

Is the Sony E-mount lens compatible with the EF-M mount?

@Anthony2lars Жыл бұрын

Hello Chris. Which is better? The Sigma Art 30mm 1.4 canon EF or Sigma Contemporary 30mm 1.4 canon EFM?

@donvittoriosierra Жыл бұрын

Does the sony lens distortion correction fix the barrel distortion?

@TWX1138 4 жыл бұрын

With the particularly high density sensor in the M6 Mk. II, any thoughts on re-reviewing some of the lenses that you own or have easy access to in order to see if they still hold up compared to when you tested them on 20 and 24 megapixel cameras? I certainly understand if you don't wish to do so, as that might be a chore.

@christopherfrost 4 жыл бұрын

I will be doing one or two, probably :-)

@NickErickson 8 ай бұрын

I bought this lens for my Fuji X-S10 when it was on sale brand new for $265. At that price it is an absolute steal. A wonderfully sharp lens

@patrickdonnelly5223 2 жыл бұрын

Did you know that the Cosmicar/Pentax or Computar/Kowa 75mm lenses in C mount, will cover the APS sensor? F/1.4 or 1.3. And the Fujinon 50mm f/1.2.

@NeonSparks 9 ай бұрын

I see a picture of Aberaeron in your shots. It's not far from me and a lovely place to relax

@jordantaylor550 2 жыл бұрын

would you say this is better than the xc35mm f/2? thinking of selling mine and getting this

@fjp2000 4 жыл бұрын

Waiting for your sony 70-350mm review!😍👀

@niknitro8948 4 жыл бұрын

Me too!!!

@richardpcrowe 4 жыл бұрын

I have the 30mm f/1.4 but, don't use it as often as I previously did. The Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 lives on my cameras...

@josecore1974 4 жыл бұрын

Thank you dear 👍

@Axonteer 4 жыл бұрын

I've bought a 35mm F2 IS used for my Canon APSC (EF Mount) I really like it and if i only can take one lense with me i would probably choose it over any zooms but it is tricky to get a wider picture as it is essentialy a 56mm lense relatively speaking on my apsc. But it is light, small, very sharp and has IS thus allowing stopping down under lower light situations to get a deeper DOF. ... this 1.4 would be very interesting on EF if i didnt already had my 35

@neovo903 4 жыл бұрын

unfortunately, this lens only fits Canon ef-m mounts (or Sony-e), not ef. Nice to hear you're using the 35mm f2 is usm, I've got one too and it's awesome

@aimanrazaxxx 4 жыл бұрын

Hi Chris.. This is a lovely review.. Can you make a review of the Art version (30 1.4 Art) for Canon?

@christopherfrost 4 жыл бұрын

I have already

@raposadislexa 2 жыл бұрын

Great review! I have one question. I bought a M100, and I've been using the kit lenses, the 15-45mm one. For me who never had a proper camera before it's awesome. I've dialed all settings I could to make the colors to my prefference, trying to match irl colors with my monitor using Photoshop's RAW tool, all colors seem spot on on my profile... except for greens (and maybe some shades of red). I do painting on canvas and my green ones are always pale bluish instead of a strong emerald green they are, so I need a drastically different profile for these, but then every other photo is too green. I was thinking in getting this Sigma, but I wanted to know from your experience, since I want a more accurate color out of the box, wich lenses should I get? Or if I want a better color reproduction I should get something else? Thanks alot!

@stadjestem 2 жыл бұрын

Get Canon, either 22/2 or 32/1.4.

@xFreyelis 2 жыл бұрын

How will this lens do on the Canon M50?

@vinzaputra 4 жыл бұрын

Please review the Sigma 16mm f1.4 for eos m.

@ddesai1080 4 жыл бұрын

Please also compare 16mm and 56mm f1.4 on canon m6 mark ii body

@MicaelWidell 4 жыл бұрын

The five dysfunctions of a team - great book :)

@aldrindetablan4358 4 жыл бұрын

hey chris have you tried the 18-35 f1.8 on the m6 II?

@christopherfrost 4 жыл бұрын

Nope

@alejandramartinez3500 4 жыл бұрын

Ineed this lens on my camara canon Ef . how i can do that , i dont find any mout por may camara .

@deltalight584 4 жыл бұрын

Between this 30mm and Sigma's 16mm, which would you recommend for travel & to compliment the Sony's zoom kit lens 18-135mm?

@orlando9666 4 жыл бұрын

The 30mm

@rekshoot 4 жыл бұрын

I have Sigma 16 mm and 18-135mmm. Sony Zoom lens is great for travel but only on the day when the weather is good, it is just dark but very versatile and handy. So is good as second lens. Sigma 16 mm is heavier by which it is not well balanced with the body but is very sharp a piece of glass.

@gergiusz1 3 жыл бұрын

Do you think this would work with a Sony a7iii? I have Canon m mount and thinking of having swapped to Sony e mount by sigma but I am unsure if it would work on a full frame camera

@saifaldin_ 3 жыл бұрын

You’d have to use crop mode on A7iii, leaving you with about 10MP instead of 24MP.

@movielover2172 Жыл бұрын

Best budget ND filter for this lens for video work outside with 1.4 aperture. Help please

@vytautasbuckus1717 4 жыл бұрын

@Christopher Frost Photography, is it worth to pay more money for canon version. I have M6 mk II for one week, and this camera is really good. What me surprised is high ISO performance. Noise looks very pleasant. And if you not looking at pixel level it is almost not visible. I see this sensor on pixel level is very demanding. But in general I do not see any issues with sharpness on efm 22, sigma 17-50, 55-250 stm. Pictures look good. So is it really worth those 150€ for canon 32mm f1.4? Do you plan to test this on your new 32mpx sensor?

@christopherfrost 4 жыл бұрын

I haven't tested it yet I'm afraid but it probably is sharper

@vytautasbuckus1717 4 жыл бұрын

Thank you, I have ordered canon version already. Reasons: Smaller, native, less chromatic aberrations, sharper, better distortions, closer minimum focus distance. Cons: more expensive, slower focus, no lens hood. :) So waiting it now.

@pspr33 4 жыл бұрын

This lens stays on my camera body (Sony E) 100% of the time.

@fatboyslimz2554 3 жыл бұрын

but is it aps-c or fe?

@pspr33 3 жыл бұрын

@@fatboyslimz2554 APS-C.

@timeforrice Жыл бұрын

Does this one work with Canon 250D?

@ginny93ue 3 жыл бұрын

What I can't seem to understand is if the same lens fits both Canon and Sony? If not, which feature should I look at when ordering it for Canon? I was hoping to find an answer in this video but maybe I was just not listening carefully.

@saifaldin_ 3 жыл бұрын

Same lens, but different mount. Look for the Canon EF-M mount instead of E mount for Sony.

@MrChanw11 4 жыл бұрын

FINALLY!

@rockchandu 4 жыл бұрын

Hi Christopher.. could you please suggest best low light lens for canon M50?

@christopherfrost 4 жыл бұрын

Anything that gives you f/1.4 ;-)

@rockchandu 4 жыл бұрын

@@christopherfrost Thank you...

@SpiderXweaponX 4 жыл бұрын

Nice!

@qqwertyzzxcvb1921 3 жыл бұрын

Hi, - how would this do on sony a7ii - i here it produces some affect aroiund pcitures

@christopherfrost 3 жыл бұрын

You will get strong vignetting around the edges, because this lens is designed for APS-C cameras, not full-frame

@mr.sobuzsaha 2 жыл бұрын

Is this full frame lens?

@davidbelgrave1971 4 жыл бұрын

Please review the 16mm and 56mm APS-C Sigma lenses too!

@tanzhonghui 4 жыл бұрын

iirc he already has!

@savemyplan8 2 жыл бұрын

can we use the same exact lens on canon EFM mount cameras and sony E mount cameras?

@Necron990 Жыл бұрын

@momchilyordanov8190 4 жыл бұрын

For a Canon EF-M sytem, the native 32mm is better. On the Canon M6 II I would buy the 16mm Sigma, because it doesn't have equivalent. The 56 also. This one is far less compelling.

@khaledmohammadshaad9356 3 жыл бұрын

Hi, christopher is it user friendly if I use it sony alpha 7 m2 ?

@christopherfrost 3 жыл бұрын

@khaledmohammadshaad9356 3 жыл бұрын

@@christopherfrost Can I use this lens with my sony alpha 7 mark 2.

@christopherfrost 3 жыл бұрын

@@khaledmohammadshaad9356 Yes, but you will have to shoot in the lower resolution crop mode

@chamodmalalathunga6920 4 жыл бұрын

Do you recommend to use Sony 24-105mm on APS-C?

@ChrisParayno 4 жыл бұрын

For day time

@christopherfrost 4 жыл бұрын

Watch my review of that lens to see its image quality on APS-C

@videojeroki 4 жыл бұрын

So regarding the size and the sharpness the Canon 32mm f/1.4 is a better choice, right ?

@geopapa80 4 жыл бұрын

yes it is sharper and smaller but the cheapest you can find it in EU is 500 euros.

@kinghuthegreat 4 жыл бұрын

I have the 32mm 1.4 and found it sharper in the centre and especially in the corners. One of the best lenses on any system and a must on EF-M. The Sigma is good; the Canon is great.

@geopapa80 4 жыл бұрын

@The SuperBike Tour great price. Grey market though

@geopapa80 4 жыл бұрын

@The SuperBike Tour I've bought my manual samyang 12mm for my Sony from there but there's some risk involved if you need to use warranty.

@Lurreable 4 жыл бұрын

How does it compare to Canon's EF-M 32mm f/1.4?

@Solmbarnes 4 жыл бұрын

By the looks of it. I think I'll be saving a little longer and getting the EF-M 32mm. I would love to see a direct comparison on that M6-Mrk2 though.

@danielr9708 4 жыл бұрын

I think the Canon lens is a fair bit better and seems sharp from f/1.4, even in the corners. I would also like to see the performance on an the M6 Mark II, but I'm saving up for one.

@faunatique5110 4 жыл бұрын

Biggest selling point of course is the AF from canon to me still, love the STM and AF on Canon newer bodies when shooting video

@pedrosoares7273 4 жыл бұрын

I'm saving up for one of these two lenses. The sigma seems great but it's distortion seems a bit too much

@kian8382 4 жыл бұрын

There's nothing close to the efm32 1.4, I sold mine when I switched to Sony and I got the Sigma.

@geopapa80 4 жыл бұрын

Hope you'll review the zeiss 24mm 1.8 for e mount sometime ...

@swaggyeggs 4 жыл бұрын

Best lens by a wide margin I have had for my Sony a6300 IMO. Really happy with it and wonder how it would review 🤔

@trym2121 4 жыл бұрын

Rather than that I'd rather have Chris review the upcoming viltrox 1.4 trio. 24 zeiss is overpriced lens

@geopapa80 4 жыл бұрын

@Foto4Max I've seen some insane bargains on eBay though.

@avonworthcinematics254 3 жыл бұрын

Is this lens compatible with the Canon EOS M50 with an EF-M mount?

@christopherfrost 3 жыл бұрын

Yup

@Primeros1000 2 жыл бұрын

I like it too, wish it has IS. I got it used for $100 so it was an easy decision for me

@patrick.771 4 жыл бұрын

Is the Micro 4/3 version of this lens 30mm 4/3 equivalent or is it around 45mm then?

@vhateg 4 жыл бұрын

On Sony APS-C it is equivalent to 45mm full frame. On Canon APS-C it is equivalent to 48mm. On micro 4/3 it is 60mm equivalent

@patrick.771 4 жыл бұрын

@@vhateg thank you!

@HiteshKumar-nx5wc 3 жыл бұрын

Amazing Video Sir.😊😊🥰 Sir plz suggest me some best lenses for my videos. I create educational videos teaching on whiteboard. I am not happy with the video quality of the kit lens of Canon M50. I have EF-EOS M mount adaptor that comes with Canon M50. I shoot at from 24 to 32 focal length. Plz sir...Do tell me.

@MrEdweird 4 жыл бұрын

Odd, the 30/1.4 was considered the sharpest lens for Sony E-mount when it was released way back when.

@trym2121 4 жыл бұрын

It is a contemporary, not art lens. Nothing is odd. Sigma know their product.

@theizza68 4 жыл бұрын

That was in 2016. Even this lens's brothers 16mm and 56mm are better optically, sharper with less chromatic aberration.

@trym2121 4 жыл бұрын

@@theizza68 and better af design than the 30mm

@kian8382 4 жыл бұрын

I used both the EFM32 1.4 and the 30 1.4 Sony E version, while the 32 1.4 is a near perfect lens, on Sony bodies without the AA filter the 30 1.4 may look even sharper except in the corners

@geopapa80 4 жыл бұрын

@@kian8382you mean the a5100 has aa filter? And what Sony bodies do not have ?

@crazychrislim 4 жыл бұрын

canon efm 32mm f/1.4 & sigma 30mm f/1.4 m mount, which one is better?

@christopherfrost 4 жыл бұрын

The Canon but it'll cost you a lot more

@crazychrislim 4 жыл бұрын

Christopher Frost Photography but I use for filming video is it still canon better？

@davelse8919 3 жыл бұрын

Sigma or Canon EFM 32mm?

@Misakimedz 4 жыл бұрын

Looking for this ♥️ Recently bought my sony a6400.:)

@Rob2020 4 жыл бұрын

MyCooking HabitPH be sure to include the 16 and 56

@Misakimedz 4 жыл бұрын

Robert S. Okay, i will :) sony lenses are a bit pricey :D

@stardomee 4 жыл бұрын

you probably got yourself the best a6xxx camera of the lot! (in other words I envy you lol) - I'll opt myself for the older and cheaper a6000 and save to spend on good lenses instead

@Misakimedz 4 жыл бұрын

stardomee okay thankyou! i'll try invest for a better lens in my camera. 😊

@amiraizent6924 2 жыл бұрын

Why i cant take photos with this lens? I can only take photos if i set it to release shutter without lens but the autofocus won't work. Can anybody help me? M100 Sigma 30mm 1.4 dc dn

@WeddingStoriesByRakesh Жыл бұрын

Does it have IS?

@alejandramartinez3500 4 жыл бұрын

I need yuor help please , a have this lens , end i have my (black magic cinema camara 2.5k ef canon , how i can do to mout??? what mout?? i dont have any idea!! help me please, please!!

@christopherfrost 4 жыл бұрын

You own an EF-mount camera. This is an EF-M lens - it won't fit. You should read your camera's instruction manual so you know which lenses to buy

@pedrosoares7273 4 жыл бұрын

Sigma 30mm 1.4 vs Canon 32mm 1.4, what's the better lens?

@christopherfrost 4 жыл бұрын

The Canon, probably, but it's also more expensive

@dewabagusputudanda 4 жыл бұрын

Sir,,, how MUCH FOR indonesia rupiah??

@typeology8266 11 ай бұрын

Sadly I found the fuji version in my hand is obviously way softer in all range than the tests above.

@christopherbartleson8918 Жыл бұрын

This one is also available in the L mount.

@yuumiBreeder 4 жыл бұрын

would love to hear your thoughts on the voigtlander 40mm 1.2 for sony!

@samysnakke 3 жыл бұрын

I m a noob and i have a question. Can i mount it on canon 90d?

@johnbennett3702 3 жыл бұрын

No. It's only for mirrorless cameras, and you have a Digital SLR

@ybgaming9547 4 жыл бұрын

This lens its amazing for photo but for video the autofocus on sony its not good on low light

@Garbid 4 жыл бұрын

Finally!))

@dima1353 4 жыл бұрын

On Sony its must have, but canon is really good at pricing the eos m system, so native 32 1.4 is not much more expensive. Lens like 32 1.4 can be costs 600 or even 700 dollars If it was Fuji, micro 4/3 or Sony. But Eos M is just small, modest system, without claiming to be a luxury or "Pro" :)