😂😂😂

😂👍🏼

But he said “Gassullu” took jones down.

💯😂

You sure about that? 😂

Yup massive respect for that, but I think he did sorta toot his own horn a bit too much while doing so

Nobody at that time was asking for easy fights, they got paid in coupons pretty much and they lost money and time to develop techniques and training programs for the newer generations to crap on by ducking people and wanting easy paths to the title 😂

@@JA-ru3ilI feel like not enough people realize a lot of the fighters back then were losing money to fight. All glory, no fortune.

@@aqueousconch1103meanwhile Jon is over here trying to get his fans hyped about fighting a basically retired Stipe Miocic.

"Give me the toughest guy and let's see how tough I a against him"

😂

I thought he was done with that.

That’s the best . Hard to find now a days sadly .

He's just old bro

Uh yeah, do you not understand what he was trying to say? All he said was that his legitimate reach is 79.5 but they listed it wrong at 76. Mix ups like that happen all the time with heights and reaches

@@3ncore706 nah that’s not what he said. He literally said what I just put in quotes. Cope

@@puertoricanpapi1356 He literally did not say what you put in quotes. I guess english isnt your strong suit

@@3ncore706he literally DID say what they put in quotes. Okay, they were off by a word or two if you want to get technical. But that’s what he said, probably why they put it in quotes.

@@mbuck253 Wrong. Chuck said that his true legitimate reach is 79.5 which is basically 80, but they listed it as 76. Nothing about that statement was ridiculous in any way The other commenter was trying to frame it as if Chuck was saying something silly. All i did was correct him and tell him that people getting listed wrong happens all the time in the ufc

😂 then gets knocked out by spinning elbow

And "why does he keep poking my eyes"

​@@Lordoftheswollengold😂😂😂😂

Chuck Liddell would whoop that turds sorry eye-poking, ped swallowing, women beating, dwi pos scumbags arse

Chicken legs*

The one thing that Chuck Liddell had was extreme counter striking once somebody threw a punch he knew how to counteract quickly also he had great wrestling defense

@@treverpitts ya man prime chuck was amazing dude. All these new guys don’t give these old guys enough credit

​@@hungandfaded815but Jon Jones is still on another level. Not even close.

Jon Jones is just the UFC's flavour of the month

Chuck would match up very well against Jones. Jones's steroid use might literally be the one thing that could get him a win, because he was using one that helps with endurance, and Chuck's gas tank could run low. But otherwise, way better than Jones in striking - Jones couldn't hurt him with punches, or make him respect his power, elite wrestler and one of the best ever at stuffing and getting up for takedowns... solid eyepokes... a submission, or getting Chuck down a few times in the fight would be his most likely path to victory against Chuck.

You sir are a long time fan like myself. We used to throw parties anytime Chuck fought and invite yhe boys out. Those were the good ole days in my late 20s now im 44. 😅

@@SouthFLMudClub Same age.... 1979🤘

@@joecampbell4199 yeah buddy. 👍

With a stare down that made people apologize for something that they didn't do

Hell yea... Iceman was a legend

The real winner of Jones vs Liddell would be the UFC Coke dealer.

Still think he should do one more. The fight against Tito was a lucky win of Tito because Chuck had to cut weight. Chuck should move to heavyweight and fight Jon Jones, but Dana is to afraid of Jon losing so that’s why they don’t allow it.

He was the 👑 for a few years. Blast 2 watch. Him n Nick Diaz got me REALLY hooked onthis shit. 👋👋👋👋

@@supergangstar1234you’re actually a bot. no living breathing person thinks a 50 year old chuck liddell beats jon jones

Including his brain...

Why wouldn’t he? Lol. Nothing to lose

@@kaylek3874 I mean yeah now 😅 but back in his prime it would've been a banger

@@ChadoTheDon jones length and kicks it wouldn’t of been close. And this is coming from an ice man fan

@@kaylek3874 Maybe you're right bro it's unfortunate we'll never get to see it

@@ChadoTheDon he’s right chuck got cooked twice by rampage

All Hail JESUS. Not a mortal.

Yeah, but too one dimensional & slow on the feet. not explosive enough to change the course of the fight

​@@jakecollins4545First of, those guys are NATURALLY stronger than Jones. Second of, Tito never took Chuck down, or even came close. Rampage took Chuck down once, and Chuck got right back up. Randy was the only one who took prime Chuck down and kept him on the groun. Jones wouldn't be able to do that.

Chuck had more than just TDD, he could actually wrestle albeit he never did. Overseas a young skinny Overeem turned him into a wrestler to some effect.

​@@jakecollins4545if rampage took him down just imagine what Jon would do after he toyed with Rampage in their fight..

And he never tried to take it safe or let it go to the judges

@@wesleymathews956 yep and its taken a toll on him but hes a legend.

Yeah but Chuck i think lost to Rampage twice.

@@tiz6549 and Tito and Randy lost to Chuck twice…….whats your point?

@@turdfergusonoutdoors5070he lost to tito and couture too

Nope

@@manga3040 nope to what? use your words and elaborate on what you're saying nope to like a big boy...you can do it I believe in you

Yeah....his chin was granite. He pretty much invented sprawl and brawl. That looping overhand punch he threw when he looked like he was actually shooting? You never see that anymore and it was a great weapon. Another Chuck punch you never see is the one where he sidestepped and took a little quarter turn to face people who over extended themselves and was clobbering them before they knew what happened. You never see either of those anymore. I would love to see prime Chuck fight Jones.

'Prime' chuck got smashed by rampage twice....he was a top fighter but gets overrated

​@@jonjohnson1978.Nothing wrong losing to prime Rampage, and as they say STYLES MAKES FIGHTS, Rampage was always a fighter, more of a street fighter, so Chuck who prefers keeping the fight standing most likely would lose to someone like Rampage. Jones wouldn't dare go toe to toe with those two

The rest of the guys that fought in his era are fine. I think it is something more than fighting

It’s his fighting style of banging is what made him this way look at adesanya jon jones khabib gsp these dudes fought killers yet are still articulate and smart cuz they fought smart and don’t take much damage

Nate Diaz is another. Dudes brain is gonna look like Benoit's when he passes.

He also parties, drinks, smokes and does cocaine.

Perhaps but let us not forget what an amazing fighter he was and he had outstanding take down defense. Would’ve loved to have seen that fight but I still wouldn’t bet against the 🐐 Jon Jones!

He's always sounded like that stfu

Honestly, he never was the mosy eloquent. That said, those last few fights he had could've been avoided.

Yeah hes been like this for awhile now. Sad man. U can't keep getting hit in the head your whole life or prime of your life and expect to come out clean. 😊

Its head injuries sure....however, "Coccaine is a helluva drug".

@No limit ty no

The eye pokes and oblique kicks to the knee are incredibly questionable. His ducking usada and popping dirty after fights is next level.

​@@BillyBob-wq9fldon't forget Jones practices by beating his wife.

​@@BillyBob-wq9fl cope harder

Ain’t it and he wasn’t afraid to get hit. And his superman punch was a problem

He also never faced a wrestler like JJ.

​@@thesilvershota3091randy couture......

@@sanzmarc07 jon is levels above randy. Homie ragdolled olympic medalist wrestlers like they were his kids. Chuck tweaking on that cte pack heavily.

​@@sanzmarc07 MMA wrestling, not a straight up amateur match. Most of the American Guys that Jones has fought (Hamill, Bader, Sonnen, Rashad, DC) were high level wrestlers that he absolutely rag dolled.

Stop. Jones was able to take down DC multiple times. If you think Jones would have trouble taking Chuck down you're trippen lol Jones finishes Chuck in round 1

@@Hippypippyzippy6769 you are the most delusional person ive ever read a comment from lmfao

​@@Hippypippyzippy6769lmao randy couture lost twice to chuck

@SanzMarc07 okay? Jones would beat the shit out of him too lol wtf were you trying to do there

@@Hippypippyzippy6769 You know nothing about MMA and it shows 😂😂😂.

false DJ GSP are GOAT AP becoming 1 soon if he keeps winning.

Yea hes on that Tren level

@@irongraveyard1121 He wasn't that muscular dude. No way was he doing Tren.

@@VerisimilitudeDude you may be right, either way his legacy is tarnished forever.

​@@irongraveyard1121 Chuck and Jones' legacy are unblemished.

Chuck Liddell would whoop that turds sorry eye-poking, ped swallowing, women beating, dwi pos scumbags arse

Ehhh not really ufc wasn’t massive until Conner if we’re getting technical

No doubt! Jones would methodically 🙅🏾‍♂️pick apart the Iceman 🧊🧖🏻until there was only a small puddle of water left in the middle of the octagon 💦

Jones would easily win it....

​@@IAlreadyKnowIAintSh_t I like how put this 🤔

Unless he hit him. Liddel in his prime just had to touch you and you're asleep

@@keithtowers4627 Yea even then he’s not knocking Jones out. Jones has been in there with guys with ridiculous power and never been knocked out. He’s barely been dazed.

No he wouldn’t! Dana should make this fight right now! The only reason Chuck lost against Tito in their last fight is because Chuck had a massive weight cut. It would actually be perfect to see Chuck vs Jon at heavyweight.

Chuck is a good but dumb fighter. He would just charge after Jones and get obliterated. He can throw good punches but he is a novice compared to Jones

@@kingofoblivion1822 jones would replicate what Suga did to Chuck.

@@supergangstar1234 your knowledge of that fight game is literally ass. Both in their prime jones walks through chuck no problem. Chuck also go ko cold by evans and rampage so your theory about the whole massive weight cut ain’t valid

@࿘ COROA ࿗ more like your a complete idiot. There’s a reason why one of them a few losses in his career and the other has none besides a no contest. Clown

Facts I always like his combos when he was ready to end a fight. Quick powerful punches

These kids today don’t know how good he was. The fact he fought Overeem and Rampage in one night is nuts. I actually would have liked to see a prime Overeem vs Jon that would be interesting

I think prime overeem would’ve beaten Jon it’s that jaw that’s so questionable but he was so powerful man leg kicks folded Brock

@@mitocambrelen9544 Also his ground game was really good too and his reach size would have been an issue for Jon. Jon is smart it would have be a good one

Lmao except john got beat up by average fighters like Alexander Gustafsson and Dominick Reyes.

@@Promislandzion Bruh?? Gustafsoon was sooo far from average! Have you actually watched any of his fights?

@@Promislandzionok but what happened to Gustafsson the second time?

​@@Promislandziongo and watch the fight again 😅😅

@@Promislandzion yea your a dumbass

All y’all have is sports in this life. And we gave you that just enjoy the short time you’ve been given. It’s coming to a dead end for eternity soon

Agree 💯 wouldn't even be close I like chuck in his prime but Jones is something different he is the goat

Reach advantage combined with a safety first running style is massively overlooked. Not saying fighters should change how they fight, but that we should recognise why some fighters had the success they did. Izzy is elite, but much of his success was due to his reach advantage vs his rivals. Got outstruck by Jan on the feet, Alex landed more than izzy in their fights, one time he abandoned his safety first reach merchant style vs gastelum and nearly got KOd by a B rated fighter. This is why when these type of fighters face someone their own size, they no longer look like the GOAT striker, they end up going life and death, like jj vs reyes, gustaffson, or izzy vs jan and alex. izzy, silva, gane etc usually stay on the end of their reach, refusing to take any risk. Breaking the shorter man down from where there is no threat of retaliation, before going in for the kill. The shorter fighter has to lunge in to connect and so are at a great disadvantage. Many fighters have had the success they had largely due to this advantage they had vs their rivals. The smaller fighter needs to be more skilled than the longer fighter to overcome this, and even then, e.g with Rob vs izzy, its still very hard What blew my mind was when i looked at floyds record. Floyd had a monster reach for his divisions and the only people in his WHOLE career that had more reach than him were mgregory de la and Paul, and you saw how them went. Ducked anyone with reach like lara, margarito, Khan, Williams etc its no coincidence that fighters like floyd, izzy, jj etc hugely succesful, also had huge reach advantages vs their rivals and fought a reach merchant running style. Combat sport is littered with examples of the less skilled rangier fighter using reach to jab and hug and run to wins vs the more skilled smaller fighter. Recently aj vs ruiz, went to war and aj got whooped, then in the return, aj switched to jabbing hugging and running to an easy W. Usyk was too skilled for this. Usyk is goated. Duran vs Leonard 1, went to war, duran won Duran Leonard 2, Leonard used his reach advantage to run 🏃‍♂ to what was gonna be an easy victory until Duran quit as he wasn't there to play tag these fighters usually have boring fights because they fights a running defensive reach merchant fight, refusing to take any risk hiding behind reach to get the W. Anderson Silva was the same, Jon jones, great against the smaller guys with 85 reach, but when fighting his own size, like reyes gustaffson etc he arguably lost Its easier to fight defensively with a huge reach advantage but its much harder funking someone up taking a few risks. Speed power timing etc can be improved but reach cannot, and it can be decisive when paired with a defensive style. Khamzat was berated by his coach for going to war instead of using his reach adv to make it an easy fight. Smaller fighter needs to be more skilled than the longer fighter to be successful, like a usyk, pac, tank, dc, canelo mike tyson etc Thankfully for us fans, not all fighters with reach fight like this, although they would be more successful if they did but the sport would be dead Izzy said it best himself when he said Costa will be easy as he has t rex arms and won't reach

So did Jesus' earliest followers consider him to be God? EHRMAN: Well, what I argue in the book is that during his lifetime, Jesus himself didn't call himself God and didn't consider himself God and that none of his disciples had any inkling at all that he was God. The way it works is that you do find Jesus calling himself God in the Gospel of John, our last Gospel. Jesus says things like: Before Abraham was, I am, and I and the father are one, and if you've seen me, you've see the father. These are all statements that you find only in the Gospel of John, and that's striking because we have earlier Gospels, and we have the writings of Paul, and in none of them is there any indication that Jesus said such things about him. I think it's completely implausible that Matthew, Mark and Luke would not mention that Jesus called himself God if that's what he was declaring about himself. That would be a rather important point to make. So this is not an unusual view among scholars. It's simply the view that the Gospel of John is providing a theological understand of Jesus that is not what was historically accurate. GROSS: Jesus was referred to as the king of the Jews. Did he call himself that, and what did that mean it is time? Do we know? Can we have any idea what that meant in its time? EHRMAN: Yeah, we do know, and actually to be a king of the Jews simply meant literally, being the king over Israel. It is a very difficult question to get to, what Jesus taught about himself because of the nature of our gospels, but one thing is relatively certain, that that the reason the Romans crucified Jesus was precisely because he was calling himself the king of Israel. Now, Jesus obviously was not the king. So what might he have meant by it? Well, what scholars have long thought is that Jesus was talking about not being put on the throne by means of some kind of political show of power, but that Jesus thought the world as he knew it was coming to an end and God was going to bring in a kingdom, a new kingdom in which there would be no more injustice or oppression or poverty or suffering of any kind. And in this kingdom, Jesus appears to have thought that he himself would be the future king. And so Jesus meant this not in the regular political sense but in a kind of apocalyptic sense, that at the end of the age, this is what was going to happen: he was going to be installed as king. GROSS: So Jesus saw himself as the messiah. What else did that mean in its time? EHRMAN: Well, a lot of Christians today have a wrong idea about what the messiah was supposed to be. The word messiah is a Hebrew word that literally means the anointed one. This was used in reference to the kings of Israel. The ancient kings of Israel, when they became king during the coronation ceremony, would have oil poured on their head as a sign of divine favor. And so the king of Israel was called God's anointed one, the messiah. There came a point at which there was no longer a king ruling Israel, and some Jewish thinkers began to maintain that there would be a future king of Israel, a future anointed one, and they called that one the messiah. And so the messiah for most Jews simply referred to the future king of Israel. And so when Jesus told his disciples that he himself was the messiah, he was saying that in the future, when God establishes the kingdom once more, I myself will be the king of that kingdom. And so it's not that the messiah was supposed to be God. The messiah was not supposed to be God. The messiah was a human being who would be the future king, and that's probably what Jesus taught his disciples that he was... Its truly mind blowing that despite theclear evidence the devil has mislead them away from Jesus true message, that he was a man sent by God, a prophet, preached to worship God alone, they remain ignorant 😔

@@fuuf7092 So you must have never heard of a slip, duck, shot, kick, grab. Also you said the reach advantage like it's rare for a shorter stocky fighter to win. Similar to the NBA MMA would have already trended towards a tall lanky body type by now after 30 years. The fact is there is no advantage, people just fight to their strengths. Mark Hunt and Roy Nelson murdered Stephen Struve. DC destroyed Bigfoot Silva. Kelvin Gastilem wrecked Izzy. Henry, DJ, Tai Tuivasa, Tyson, Tyron Woodley, Matt Serra, Sean Sherk.

Fuck yeah ! The ppl that KO’d Liddell are the same ones that Jones destroyed.

Reach advantage combined with a safety first running style is massively overlooked. Not saying fighters should change how they fight, but that we should recognise why some fighters had the success they did. Izzy is elite, but much of his success was due to his reach advantage vs his rivals. Got outstruck by Jan on the feet, Alex landed more than izzy in their fights, one time he abandoned his safety first reach merchant style vs gastelum and nearly got KOd by a B rated fighter. This is why when these type of fighters face someone their own size, they no longer look like the GOAT striker, they end up going life and death, like jj vs reyes, gustaffson, or izzy vs jan and alex. izzy, silva, gane etc usually stay on the end of their reach, refusing to take any risk. Breaking the shorter man down from where there is no threat of retaliation, before going in for the kill. The shorter fighter has to lunge in to connect and so are at a great disadvantage. Many fighters have had the success they had largely due to this advantage they had vs their rivals. The smaller fighter needs to be more skilled than the longer fighter to overcome this, and even then, e.g with Rob vs izzy, its still very hard What blew my mind was when i looked at floyds record. Floyd had a monster reach for his divisions and the only people in his WHOLE career that had more reach than him were mgregory de la and Paul, and you saw how them went. Ducked anyone with reach like lara, margarito, Khan, Williams etc its no coincidence that fighters like floyd, izzy, jj etc hugely succesful, also had huge reach advantages vs their rivals and fought a reach merchant running style. Combat sport is littered with examples of the less skilled rangier fighter using reach to jab and hug and run to wins vs the more skilled smaller fighter. Recently aj vs ruiz, went to war and aj got whooped, then in the return, aj switched to jabbing hugging and running to an easy W. Usyk was too skilled for this. Usyk is goated. Duran vs Leonard 1, went to war, duran won Duran Leonard 2, Leonard used his reach advantage to run 🏃‍♂ to what was gonna be an easy victory until Duran quit as he wasn't there to play tag these fighters usually have boring fights because they fights a running defensive reach merchant fight, refusing to take any risk hiding behind reach to get the W. Anderson Silva was the same, Jon jones, great against the smaller guys with 85 reach, but when fighting his own size, like reyes gustaffson etc he arguably lost Its easier to fight defensively with a huge reach advantage but its much harder funking someone up taking a few risks. Speed power timing etc can be improved but reach cannot, and it can be decisive when paired with a defensive style. Khamzat was berated by his coach for going to war instead of using his reach adv to make it an easy fight. Smaller fighter needs to be more skilled than the longer fighter to be successful, like a usyk, pac, tank, dc, canelo mike tyson etc Thankfully for us fans, not all fighters with reach fight like this, although they would be more successful if they did but the sport would be dead Izzy said it best himself when he said Costa will be easy as he has t rex arms and won't reach.

Chuck wasn't prime when he started getting KOd. He would've lit jones up.

@@anthonypesqueira7540 doesn’t matter. Jon is a superior fighter period

@@fuuf7092 on the other hand kelvin gave him a hard time with his even shorter reach because of the angles and granite chin

he cheats too much to be the GOAT, the title should have gone to Gus.

@@Brukner841 he beat Gus twice stop that 😂

@@thehorrorfamilyllc it was so close though, and Gus wasn't gouging out his eyes, and also that knee kick is just wrong to use, I don't respect the guy.

@@Brukner841 the first fight was super close. Hell of a fight! Rematch … not at all .. jones proved he’s the best over and over man. It’s not even debated at this point. As far as the kick, a lot of ppl don’t like it. BUT it’s legal. So until that changes 🤷🏻‍♂️

It is. And while I know he’s about 55 and a former pro fighter, he’s basic movement even here looks so labored.

That’s what I thought when I heard him talk like Nate Diaz

True that, when did chuck become the old guy at the bar? I used to be able to whoop as??? C'mon, man up in your later years men!

He’s always talked like this

​@@OwningYourMindhe'll still BLIKSEM anybody in this comment section

Yeeeeeeeeeeees 💪

Yeah round one sub by Jon jones 🤣

Yeah, on paper😂 . Rampage spanked Liddell every chance he got. He could do anything with Jones.

Not really bro. I love chuck, but bones would've starched him

One hell of a beating

We will never know. But Chuck had great take down defense. Sprawl and brawl was real. Chuck makes a good point about Gustafson being able to hit Jon.. if he was able to chuck for sure would be able to.. if jones at all struggles to take chuck down.. he could get caught in a brawl and if you get hit by chuck.. lights out for sure. 👍👊 #IceMan

@@MaxxGains yes tf we do know lol Jones would beat the shit out of Chuck. If you think even Prime Chuck would give Jones a tougher fight then Alex and DC you're trippen 😂 if Jones took DC down whenever he would slam Chuck on his head. This fight wouldn't be close

@David Sturgeon you can have your opinion and that may be most people's opinion. Jones is one of the best if not the best to ever do it. Now I am a little biased because I was drawn into MMA and the UFC mostly because of Chuck Liddell. He was by far one of thee most influential figures that Boosted UFCs popularity. With his fighting style..Looks and Highlight reel KOs. With some classic celebrations. Now Sprawl and Brawl was awesome..and nobody did it better than Chuck. Chuck could take a lot of punches and had a one of thee best chins. He would walk through punches at different times in his career.. of course ad he got older and after so many street fights and MMA fights.. the chin does diminish. Which is what happened his last several fights. But to dismiss and count out a prime Chuck Liddell vs Jon Jones would be absolutely foolish to think that Chuck couldn't land a KO blow to Jones. This is the thing.. Jones is a fairly creative striker.. but Jones never had the KO ability like Chuck did. Jones would have to go into the fight and be looking for the takedown. If Chuck was able to stuff Jones and keep the fight standing.. Jones would be the one at a disadvantage. and its possible.. Chuck has a wrestling background and was one of the best to defend takedowns in the history of the sport. Don't dismiss Chuck Liddell especially if you haven't done good research and watch some of his history. Go check out sprawl and brawl on youtube. It was kind of a fun video on Chuck. 👍

@@MaxxGains i grew up watching Chuck and him having more KO power doesn't mean shit lol Plenty of guys Jones faught were way better fighters then Chuck. And you really think Jones wouldn't take Chuck down when he took down an Olympian with ease and thats because DC started off as a HW. All that bs you wrote was for nothing lol you act like Jones can't hold his own against high level strikers. He held his own against guys like Gane who is a HW Rampage ,DC, Alexander, Reyes, Santos, Evans and TRT Vitor. Jones beats Chuck 6 days a week and twice on Sunday. I hate jones and think he's a cheater but he would tbag chuck if he really wanted too lol fuck out of here.

Dude got flatlined by rashad and rampage and y’all swear this dude could touch jon who made both of them look like children

His corner threw on the towel in Pride against Rampage

@@garrydye2394 I'm not sure how Chuck would win. I think Jon is significantly better in every area.

yeah he would be totally dominated

Wasn't in his prime by then, would of beaten jackass in his prime

​@@blahblah6227 Chuck was in his prime.

Cain Valasquez? Wasn't he kinda at his peak while Jon was just getting started on cleaning out the LHW division, and doing picograms and coke 😂 I agree tho it b a banger!

That would have been a great fight.

he was about to KO himself trying to complete this thought

He wouldn't have anything for jones

@@buckybarns4991 If it were only stand and Brawl 💯 if not of course 🤘

@Dylan Ok 👌 if Jones and Liddell come in the cage both prepared to their fullest just to stand and throw hands, in their prime then I got Chuck all day💯✌️

@Dylan Ok 😂🤣🤣✌️

Facts

​@icoroa you should never comment about ufc fighters again

Sluurp, sluurp. You hero worshippers kill me.

Did you see him do even one mountain of cocaine? Or did you just believe him because he said it in a little press conference?

He did that with Prime DC, Gus, possibly even Gane lol.

Not really

Well Chuck has nothing to worry about. He would never be expected to back his talk up. Jon would look like an asshole for talking shit to Chuck over this.

Oh so bad..

If you’re a fighter, putting those words in a sentence, wouldn’t be in your repertoire.

@@mr.rattlebone4902 Why not? Still think that Chuck should do one more fight and he should fight Jon Jones. Would be a legit 50/50 fight.

Lmao except john got beat up by Alexander Gustafsson and Dominick Reyes both burly average fighters.

I think Jones would win. But Chuck used more pace and pressure than Rampage. And he had better cardio too.

That's such a weird comparison but ok

​@@jikosauce not really. Rampage knocked Chuck out twice. Once in Pride and then to win the LHW title. Chuck was never the same after that second knock out from Rampage.

@@lawrencejohnson9154 that's a totally different fighter when they fight someone else and thats a bad logic when there's too many factors like the ground game to base how one fight went will decide the next fight. There's too many factors to go off how a day in he past went

He would give Jon a fight. But yeah he will not lose, Decision win for Jones. And I don't like him. But you can't deny what he has done in UFC regardless of drugs and actions outside the ring. No one is beating Jon

@@jayfosho12 I’m not a jon fan either, but he is certainly a highly skilled man

Youll never understand the mindset of a fighter then. What's the point in competing if you don't think you're the best

@@JasonMontell2501 thanks for the lesson Rocky

@@brohemianclapsody5509 No problem. I might also be able to offer some advice on how to improve the integrity of a fragile ego.

​@࿘ COROA ࿗ lmao keep dreaming bud

Your opinion. He could never embarrass Fedor. Get out of here

@@Alex21441😂😂😂😂fedor will get smoked how many times did he loss in his prime

Jon partied harder and more

@@beewalk34 do you have proof of this?

Idk bro chuck was fucking pornstars and they don't call him the ice man for no reason he'd party like an animal

@@bc1173yes, the news

@@bc1173yeah, JJ admits to doing cocaine and getting blackout drunk before fights so he can blame it on partying if he loses

I can understand him without sub title

He's clearly speaking & easy to understand

They do that on videos with EVERYONE LOL nice try though.

Stop smoking Crack kid, chuck would have been straight wild. That's one fighter that stood up to God.

He would have said it but it doesn't mean it's fact, fighters have to have confidence or otherwise they couldn't do it. It's 90% mental.

But realistically prime Liddell does match up well with Jon phenomenal takedown defense with dynamite in his hands

Ngannou? That would be worth watching but he’s a true heavyweight with very heavy hands.

Jones would not murder a prime chuck . I believe jones would still squeak a win but it wouldn’t be a mauling. However current chuck absolute no doubt first round

I'm far from convinced on bones beating Francis. Do I think Jones is the better over all fighter? Absolutely. However with that said, with Francis, it only takes one. Miocic has a well established history and pedigree in wrestling and by fight number 2 between Francis and stipe, miocic didn't take him down and control him as he had in their previous fight. I think Jones would get one of, if not the toughest challenge of his career. Too bad we will never get to see it happen cuz that would be a fight to see!

​@@carlosdavid5538 no Chuck w sleep him. Like conner in his prime. But man he picks the tough ones.

@@mattbedard-tr9qe ahhhh I donno man , I love chuck but jones is literally the best you can’t deny it

Tell Babalu he doesn't kick 😂

​@@ryanlynch290Lol fr

Chuck was a college wrestler. To say he was a boxer says you dont know much about the man.

He definitely used kicks he was more of a kickboxer if anything then a boxer

😂