The Jungle Book (2016) says hi! 🙋‍♂️ Also I guess Maleficent just doesn't count.

That was a villian pov more than the princess side. But i see your point. ​@RyansChannel0203

@@RyansChannel0203Jungle book wouldn’t be a princess live action either. Maleficent is an entire different story, not just a Villain POV. Cinderella is the only good one tbh it felt more of a homage to the original while adding more context and scenes between her and the prince I wish they would just stop them now. What they did to Mulan 😭

@@aquele4virou3 The only thing this remake really does better than the original is the stuff with the prince tbh. Everything else I felt like was a step backwards.

2:20 😆😆

Damn! She looks different in blonde.

Isn't that... what it actually is?

_Ever After_ is not a fairy tale movie. Whatever that movie is it's visually dumb, and it feels like it hijacked the Cinderella fairy tale in order to tell a different story that has nothing to do with the Cinderella story. I don't want anyone associating the Cinderella character with Danielle de Barbarac. She has to be the worst Cinderella to ever exist. She's fine as a protagonist of some random movie, but specifically for Cinderella, she's awful. Who the hell thinks Cinderella is the type of character to hit and punch people and play in the mud? So stupid.

@@0deadx21 Please take a breath and go touch some grass. Or smoke some. Whichever will help you more. You're raging over a 25 year old _movie._

@@kriscynical No. I'm raging at the ridiculous ways people are talking about it. Is that what people are supposed to believe is the best executed Cinderella story? Dull and unimpressive visuals and even dumber dialogue, a dying old lady telling what turns out to be a pointless story to the Brothers Grimm, a main character who does random stuff like play in the mud and swordfighting for no reason, who lies about her identity and is not above resorting to violence, there's some crud about selling people, random sexism and classism, there's a masquerade party instead of a ball, which the main character doesn't even wear a ball gown to and is very short lived? WHAT THE HELL IS ANY OF THIS SHIT? If you want to make a Cinderella movie, make a freaken Cinderella movie and tell the story of Cinderella. Don't make some random movie that just has Cinderella elements in it, and claiming it to be a genuine Cinderella adaptation. There's a difference between a movie inspired by a fairy tale and being an actual adaptation of it.

@@0deadx21 Please notice the two little words up there at the end of that first sentence in my original comment: _"for me"._ I didn't say it's definitively the best version of Cinderella because that's _completely subjective_ and a silly thing to try and state as objective fact. You getting your knickers in a knot and being rude as hell over _absolutely nothing_ isn't going to sway anybody in favor of _your_ subjective opinion over their own subjective opinion. It's amusing to me that me liking a movie you apparently hate is bothering you _so very much._ Again: you are frothing at the mouth over variations of Cinderella. That's _really_ sad.

@@kriscynical Nothing will ever top Drew Barrymore and Angelica Huston, you say. Nothing will ever top them in what? Danielle de Barbarac is already one of the most unCinderella-like Cinderellas and she's not even very beautiful; she can easily make a believable wicked stepsister. And what the hell does the stepmother even do that's noteworthy? She's not a foil to Cinderella's character, she's just a typical greedy, power-hungry woman.

And also I really hate how everyone just assumes her dresses is blue it's not technically blue it's technically silver in the original cartoon what Disney made a long time ago it's just over time everyone just assumed it was blue because of the coloring they did in the movie when it showed her dancing with the prince at night which everyone knows in cartoons when it's night time everything looks blue no matter what color it technically is.

Sure