That line is so eye roll inducing

@@gmmartines7331 only for racist fucks...

2 hours long! O M G!!!!!

Very enthusiastic walks

this a goddamn hellsing abridged reference?

Thanks for the Time Stamps, bro! 😎

Amazing public service. Bravo. This '78 kid thinks you do the Batman proud.

You're a good man, an honorable man

that moment you realize you completely forgot the plot of the Ant Man movies.

“10 seconds of credits”

You are shown this, instead of exposition for it. *PowerSposition* ? *It's called SHOW don't tell.* Just have to be observant which CinemaSins definitely is not. Here is what happens point by point. You can watch the film and observe each moment as follows.... 1) Danvers is attacked by energy blasts from Thanos ship. 2) She absorbs this energy and her power halo glows and increases. 3) Then she releases this energy *against* the ship. 4) That destroys the ship - fine - but she is no longer as powerful. 5) She fights Thanos and in fact is not as strong - but more importantly as cunning and ruthless as he is. 6) She had the Gauntlet - but Thanos blew up the Quantum Tunnel, and the result of the blast (and the interaction of the blast and gauntlet) - knocked the Gauntlet out of Danvers hand. 7) Now Thanos has the Gauntlet. She uses BOTH HER HANDS just to keep him from snapping his fingers. 8) While she is holding on to the Gauntlet she ABSORBs power off of it - just like what happened with the ship. 9) Now when Thanos hits her - *she doesn't even flinch* - Thanos is about to lose! 10) He recognizes what is happening. (CinemaSins and many viewer *still don't.* Again smart film - but not so bright members of audience in some cases). 11) Thanos pulls the power stone out of the Gauntlet - now Danvers power halo visibly decreases! 12) Thanos grimaces from the pain of the power stone which would likely disintegrate anyone else - he is now charged up with Infinite Power, easily and vastly more powerful than Danvers and he knocks her out. ^ All the ideas, meaning and fight logic are there in the film. It's just that *lazy* viewers don't have the attention span or attention to detail to understand anything. They literally want the film to stop and explain it to them, like Kindergarten teacher relating ABC's.

@@summertyme5748 Dude, get a life. Clearly this entertainment is not for you so just don't watch it. How can you have nothing better to do than keep coming back to the same video for a MONTH to criticize something that isn't even meant to be taken seriously?

I mean the point of the channel is mainly to make somewhat "meme" arguments. If he praised the film we'd be watching cinema wins. Obviously half of what he said can make sense if you look past the surface but that's against the whole point. And it's crazy you think you're the smart one 😂

​@@summertyme5748Not only is that not what happens in Endgame, none of that power is even implied in her solo film. So, no, we don't need you to tell us anything about a character. We just need them to actually create and follow through on a character's arc.

@@babbyasmr2031 ^ All the ideas, meaning and fight logic are there in the film. It's just that lazy viewers don't have the attention span or attention to detail to understand anything. They literally want the film to stop and explain it to them, like Kindergarten teacher relating ABC's.

I'm thinking it'll be longer than the phaze 4 movies and TV series put together

and very few will bother watching lol

@@kurtisdeakin just like your comment

Marvel died after endgame they’ve all sucked since

@@nathsalt1890wakanda forever is good

Think the theory is that they trade the fish 🤔

@@KIMKRIS1 Which makes sense. If they had a river running through their territory it would be too valuable a resource too ignore.

vegetarian often eat fish lol, aswell as other animal products other than meat

I'm pretty sure "we're vegetarians" refers to his specific tribe within wakanda. While the fisherman line was referring to a river tribe person and the "our" was because they're both wakandans

Jeremy has no girlfriend also - which explains so much.

Loved that.

Yesss I'm glad you said that! I got a little choked up no lie

Lol. Good point!

Maybe not, they play fast and loose with mass

For Cinema Sins if you don't slow the film down and break the 4th wall explaining it like Deadpool, then, I guess it doesn't count.

He answered his own question smh 🤦🏾‍♂️

@@delmarfrazier2727 Jeremy is confused again…DING!

Correct.

"Wow, wow, wow.... Wow." cliché. *Ding.*

"oh really?"

"Oh my God"

Oh commenting something from pitch meetings is TIGHT!

They keep making mistakes creating sins related to things they just don't remember, or never understood in the 1st place.

Howard didn't steal that Vibranium. In the comics it was gifted to him by the then current king of Wakanda or T'Challa's grandfather. If you want to assume that, in the MCU, Wakanda remained largely in violate until the events depicted, then you could assume it was made from a chunk of the meteorite that fell outside of Wakanda.

@@lorzon I think their point was Jeremy said Claue was the only one who found Wakanda. And as Th3Birdman said, no, there *were* others. They just didn't live to tell about it

The 3 Spiderman solo films get progressively more and more ridiculous until the dam broke in No Way Home. I think MCU will use the 'spell' to 'forget the whole thing'.

Yo hold up I never realized that...

@@FizzJB The writers didn't either. 😆

its not that it didn’t recognize him, he never asked the glasses to reveal mysterions identity. so it most likely knew, he just never asked so it could tell him

Why does this not have more likes?

I definitely 100% agree to that!!

Not true.

​@@randomshittutorials Totally true, especially in recent movies like Love and Thunder and Antnan 3.

i dont think the cgi is getting worse i think our expectations keep going up so it appears to be worse

​@@Novacreeper231 no it's just getting worse

Same here. I cant watch a movie without hearing the continuous "bing bing" of the sin counter in my head and far too often do I exclaim "Ho--ly CGI!" when something baffles me. Its hilarious and I sooo appreciate the channel, especially when the sins are mentioned and not yelled or sung. ;)

I’m gonna sinn your use of “pps” in 2023 Sin counter: 1

@@jhamylefling2763 😂😂😂 and a sin to you for misspelling “sin”. Sin counter: 2

I enjoy the movies even more. Transformers, Avengers, Pacific Rim (first one), Godzilla. All dumb cool movies.

The question is not to make an "unsinnable" movie (it would be boring as fuck), it's to make it so good the sins don't matter.

Yeah but his father was a traitor so I mean not really

@@WhyDoINeedOneOfThese didn’t ask

Also, one of the side characters in the MCU was played by Martin Freeman, who played Watson in Sherlock. Don't forget that!

If you like Dr. Obvious humor, sure.

But it doesn't make sense why he has to fight for it??? I mean in civil war he's very clearly black panther before his father died?? So I thought only the king had access to holding that mantle?? Idk

Or flipping through a book without a coherent narrative

Haven't heard that comparison a thousand times already!

@@salinium hadnt..

The 3 Spiderman films in retrospect are not that well written. No Way Home was the worst in this regard.

And the whole point of his character arc is that he descends into being a vigilante after his character sees his whole family killed in front of him by a mad God in a cruel Universe. It's actually a great character arc when the Widow comes to save and show mercy on the killer, since that's exactly what he once did for her.

👍👍👍👍

@@chasehedges6775 Antman shrinks, and leaves chat. Quietly.

It's actually brilliant because it was devised by Quantum Physicists to answer the question of how time travel to the past could actually work. *You are the 1st person i've seen on this forum who actually showed any capacity to understand it.* 👍

@@summertyme5748 Thank you! I actually really love Quantum Physics and am planning on studying it (or astrophysics, haven't decided, might just do both). It's really interesting because it just... makes sense to me? Like time is a function of the universe so if you could look in from an outside perspective, everything that has happened, is happening, and will happen are technically taking place simultaneously. Like, we still have free will, but every decision you make, you've already made. Free will in a deterministic universe, isn't it beautiful?

@@zeldafan7457 Yes! Sadly CinemaSins be like... But Doc Brown said you have to go 88 mph! 🤡

Much of that is right. Which is better than Jeremy, but you miss it at this point: "Technically, them coming back to the avengers hq after their time travel, already means that they will succeed in defeating Thanos." No it doesn't. Remember that the MCU is a multiverse. Thanos at the end of the film is from another Universe. There is nothing preventing Thanos from winning the end of the film and resetting the multiverse from scratch. (all the Universes - including the one where the Ancient One debated Professor Hulk. In fact this kind of scenario is exactly what she feared)

This part... Like The Time Machine. Dude was tryna change the fact that his fiance died, and was completely ignoring that she was the catalyst for him building the machine that transported him back. His very use of the machine ensured that on each visit back died.

Do you not have a life? You have countless comments over the course of MONTHS defending the movies and trying desperately to explain plotholes to people who don't give a shit, like I get you have nothing else in your life besides marvel movies but jesus christ get a grip

The Quantum Tunnel is the device that connects our Universe to the Quantum Realm - or the time machine. This device was invented by Hank in order to get Janet out, 30 years later. Janet didn't go into the 'Quantum Tunnel' = true because there wasn't one 30 years ago. The best way to understand what happened to Scott is just to watch what happened when Clint did the first experiment in time travel. He went back to his farm pre snap. He hears his daughter and calls out to her. His timer is set to auto-engage and bring him back after 1 minute. He grabs the baseball mitt and before his daughter can see him - he auto returns with it. Now imagine - the Quantum Tunnel was turned off before 1 minute - in our time. Imagine it was turned off for 5 years. When you turn it back on Clint would still come back in a minute - in his time. But 5 years will have passed in your time. That's what happened with Scott. Before his timer on the Quantum Tunnel side could auto return him - the snap happened, and someone turned the Quantum Tunnel off before they were snapped away [just like Fury paged Captain Marvel before he was snapped]. So when the rat [the rat is just a proxy for the butterfly effect - if you know what this is] tripped the on button and the QT turned back on, it automatically signaled into the Quantum Realm- 5 hours later in Quantum Realm time, but the fact is it was now 5 years later *in our time.* It's very clever, and....few people actually got it, I know Jeremy didn't.

A copy is not changed?

Marvel has yet to make a masterpiece in any phase. They are just cash grabs from beginning to end.

And BO smells better than piles of actual shit. What's your point?

Not captain marvel 😂 and alot of the stuff that follows is quite good, like loki, wanda vision, and moon knight, the movies have been pretty hit and miss tho

Imagine unironically thinking Marvel movies are masterpieces.🤣

Imagine having no capability to actually read. Y'all make the dumbest comments for no reason. xD

The thing is the test to become the chieftain of Wakanda and Black Panther is one and the same. T'Challa's became Black Panther because his father became too old. It is natural in many kingdoms for the "rightful successor" to take on the roles the predecessor can no longer perform. However, we find out that T'Challa was not the rightful successor after all. Having this ambiguous system for succession is a cause for instability for a country. For example, what if T'Challa refused to participate in the trial at the beginning of the movie and ascends to throne regardless? He's now an illegitimate leader. What if T'Challa loses, but he decides "he is still the black panther regradless" as you say? Wait, that actually did happened in the movie, but what if Killmonger was the good guy? All this makes Wakanda look very stupid.

@@inazuma3gou if T’challa wasn’t the rightful successor then who do you think it was? And as it was shown earlier when he fought m’baku, the loser has to yield or die. T’challa did neither therefore the battle continued when he returned. Killmonger was the illegitimate leader who was promoted to black panther prematurely since t’challa wasn’t actually dead.

@@smoove8125 T'challa was an illegitimate Black Panther who only became the leader in the Civil War due to nepotism. That is why he faced m'baku at the Warrior Falls to prove his legitimacy.

@@inazuma3gou no he already had the ring in civil war, he was the black Panther already. He fought m’baku because it is ritual combat to challenge the panther for their position. According to you he faced m’baku to prove legitimacy, so after he became the “legit king” why did he fight killmonger? Because it’s part of the ritual to challenge for it. If what you say is true then as the legitimate king there would be no need to fight killmonger since t’challa was king already.

@@smoove8125 When T'Chaka's died, T'Challa took the ring to fill a temporary role as a king. It was never meant to be permanent. That is why he fought m'baku to prove his legitimacy. He also fought killmonger because his legitimacy again was being questioned. "as the legitimate king there would be no need to fight killmonger since t’challa was king already." That's my point. If T'Challa was already the legitimate leader, he would have no need to fight m'baku or Killmonger.

Recently? Like 1963??? Anyway the filmmaking in No Way Home is completely broken in this regard. The fanboys invoke SpiderSense as an explanation of how Peter beats Dr. Strange, but at one point Parker’s physical body is floating in the air with Dr. Strange and Peter spouting ‘hmm we don’t know why this is happening’ dialog. 😂 The real answer is - we are giving Parker plot armor 1 billion so he can beat Dr. Strange. Later in the film Goblin lying on the ground - gets up - and stabs Tobey/Parker in the back and not any of the 3 Spidermen do anything about it. Andrew is just watching the whole thing😅. Also being impaled by Goblin has no effect - when it’s pretty obvious that the original script idea was that Goblin would finally kill (Tobey) SpiderMan and Tobey would rather die than kill. But the film is baby food for baby brains so easier to have him stabbed but then have no consequences from it. I’m like…DING, DING, DING, DING DING, watching the whole way through.

@@summertyme5748 beating doctor strange, Peter just understood the trigonometry of the mirror dimension better than Dr Strange knew what to expect, but yeah, Tobey's Spiderman getting stabbed was just shoehorned in for extra drama. It really served no purpose other than driving home how evil the goblin was. Though I do like the theory that he sensed it and let himself get stabbed, knowing it wouldn't be a fatal injury to make Tom Holand Spiderman know just how dedicated he was to the original plan but ultimately let him make the choice in the end.

The scene was shot multiple times to convince Holland not to vogue. You are a 16 year old child in your father's arm's and you don't want to die. Some critics want Holland to act more like Tobey - a 28 year old man playing a teen age kid, unconvincingly in Spiderman 2.

@@summertyme5748 it was shot multiple times to "convince Holland not to vogue"? What is that even supposed to mean?

He has to be frightened that he is dying - and confused because his dad can't save him...like a kid. The instinct of the actor is to be the Spiderman from Sony - who is actually a grown man pretending to be a kid who is really a grown man, which is a fundamental flaw in *all 3 of the Raimi movies.*

Lol because Michelle Pfieffer aged 30 yrs since the 80s

​@@hiranom20 lol right she just doesn't age

You guys are never going to get it I suppose but Scott comes back in 5 hours of his time because that's when his timer was set to recall. He comes back in 5 years because because the Quantum Tunnel was turned off. If you send an email in 5 hours then that's when you send it. If the receiving end doesn't open their email for 5 years - then that's when they get it. The sad part is that as clear as this logic is - it's too hard for you, apparently.

@@summertyme5748 exactly

@@summertyme5748 how does it explain why she aged 30 years?

Actually it's your post that really doesn't make sense. Sorry. You can't say the MCU doesn't make sense because of Agents of Shield when Agents of Shield is not a part of the MCU. Note: That isn't a matter of opinion, it's a fact. MCU is a continuing story told by Marvel Studios. AOS is by ABC. The shows have completely different writers, who morever did not collaborate with one another and whose stories contradict each other. Last point: I liked Agents of Shield. Season 4 of that show is better *by far* than Phase 4 of the MCU. But I understand that I am watching COMPLETELY DIFFERENT stories. So sinning either one because they are not consistent with each other - does not make sense. You might as well sin Terminator because it's not consistent with Avatar.

That honour belongs to Baldurs Gate 3

Of course. It’s funny that the viewer is dumb about this, and then decides that even a genius Nuclear Physicists who has the Infinity Gauntlet and with it *infinite intellect* - would also be a complete bonehead. Then this person sins the ‘film’ for not acknowledging how stupid *they* would be. 😂

He often answers his own questions doesn't he?

No, an android is a robot that looks like a human. You're thinking of a Cyborg. Literally the combination of two words, CYBernetic ORGansim.

This is a guy who sinned a film for asking if Parker shot webs out of his rear - because Jeremy doesn’t know that that’s exactly what Spiders do. So….. 😂

Interesting idea. I think the main point which CinemaSins and its fans don't get, because they don't get anything that is above 3rd grade reader level - is that Thanos intended to snap - eliminate the stones so that his will could not be undone, and then die, because that's what he believes in. One of the reasons that CinemaSins can't understand this, is that they keep trying to make the character into a cartoon villain. Good examples of cartoon villain motivations are - DarkSeid in DC or Green Goblin in the MCU or Palpatine in Star Wars. They are obsessed with the heroes and beating them - to a degree that makes no sense. For example in Star Wars once Palpatine has conquered death - which is the premise of Rise of Skywalker - he should give ZERO FK's about Rey or Ren or anything they are doing. He does not need them, he doesn't need the galactic empire, [the storm troopers are laughable idiots of zero relevance to him]? He's an immortal God of unlimited power! lol. This kind of plot hole is normal for the audience so they don't notice. Thanos goal is to *balance the Cosmos by death* and then die, because that's what he believes in. And - that's exactly what he did.

@@summertyme5748 I think the main issue is that the production studios never look past the current movie for a path forward. Any longtime fan of the starwars universe know that old Palps had clones in labs scattered about the galaxy in the event he died to transfer his essence into. Hell in cannon Vader stumbles into one once. What we got with the last 3 movies was writers and directors that had zero respect for the cannon and wanted to have their fingerprints on the product. Now add to this changing directors between each movie and now you get fever dreams brought to the screen.

shut up

Yup.

They're not actually his children. They're the Black Order, and are freelance mercenaries under Thanos. Movie should've left them out if they weren't gonna use them correctly. Corvus Glaive's glaive can pierce the Hulk's skin and turn him back into Banner. They were not only underpowered in the film, but not necessary of Thanos was the big bag. He usually sends them to handle this kinda shit, and they are successful

Disagree with all that. Glave's weapon penetrated Vision and stopped him from phasing which is just as powerful. Maw straight up beat Dr. Strange (who had the time stone). Stories have to be told in context. You can't just paste stuff from a comic book into a running narrative where 1 million things are different. The things you consider canon from comics are themselves revisionist. The Black Order didn't even exist in the original Thanos Infinity War comics for example.

Yeah agreed, he'd need a full vibranium skeleton or else the strain from the torque he generates would destroy it. Maybe he holds himself together with his smoldering gaze?

Didn’t he also get super soldier serum? He’s as fast as cap and tchalla

Yes also the idea is that when you snap you are connecting your body, mind and soul to space time and reality. You have to be next level being basically to do this, like Genius’s Thanos, Professor Hulk and Tony. And you have to be able to wield the soul stone - which means you have to sacrifice. The sacrifice has to be of a soul YOU LOVE. This isn’t something someone else can do for you. Just like not anyone can wield Thor’s Hammer just because he or Steve Rogers is worthy - YOU must be worthy. Otherwise the soul stone sacrifice makes no sense as the Red Skull says it is to insure that the person who wields understands its power. He also says that he is NEVER able to wield it which is WHY he is the Guardian.

Yes. Moreover the directors have long made this clear. Thanos is a more polished fighter than the Hulk and just as strong. That is the point being made by that scene. Hulk just got beat, and that is critical to understanding his 'dysfunctional' behavior from that point on. Jeremy just doesn't understand some things very well and needs it baby-fed to him. This makes his 'exposition' sins ironic. Because without having things explained to him - he doesn't understand them.

@@summertyme5748 indeed thats why I love watching Cinemasins and then watching the Birdmans rebutals on them