bs hes using public lands for his own gain. lock his entitled ass up!

The tree of liberty is looking oftly thirsty

Freeloader.

He's not paying the grazing fees on the land. He's the thief, not the government.

​@@texaswunderkindRefusing to pay taxes for his cows grazing on the "King's" land? Oh how dare he! You'll get more oxygen to your brain without that fed boot in your throat. Taxation is theft, no exception.

I live in Nevada, watched everything I could. Brother in law went there with his horse and helped as much as he could/

Wait wait. What was the conspiracy, the rebuttal of the conspiracy and the truth? I just came from a clip of Timcast IRL where they featured one of Bundy's sons

BLM was a fake protest, in 2014 BLM was the fight of the Bureau of Land Managment vs the Bundy ranch in texas and they won their fight against the government and now they rebranded BLM to mean BLACK LIVE MATTER; google how it was in 2014 and then 3 years later BLM means something else to confuse and blind you sheep!!

These people are American ranchers NOT CRIMINALS. We’ve gotten it backwards. The criminal illegals and blacks are the ones who belong in jail.

@@Cwgrlup Thanks for revealing yourself to be a racist and a bigot. Probably still live in your mom's basement.

BLM was a fake protest, in 2014 BLM was the fight of the Bureau of Land Managment vs the Bundy ranch in texas and they won their fight against the government and now they rebranded BLM to mean BLACK LIVE MATTER; google how it was in 2014 and then 3 years later BLM means something else to confuse and blind you sheep!!

Salt of the Earth people = They can whatever the hell they want.

yeahh hell no, these entitled billy bobs using land thats not theirs to make millions and millions. screw that guys like this are the problem with the country. literally dumb billybob trash!

awesome!!!👍🏻🇺🇸 the government has turned into tyrants!

lol tax evasion is a right?! this idiot billybob needs locked up!

There's a Constitutional right to use land that doesn't belong to you?

​@@putler965 really stupid, aren't you?

bundys are trash. so can we all use public lands for our millions in profit for free???

No, we stood up against Trump and his POS cultists. Lol.

The law kind of won. It was the FBI and federal government that lost. They wouldn't hand over documents that would almost certainly prove there were connected politicians who were involved in the harassment of Bundy. They used the FBI and BLM to accomplish political goals.

It's amazing how the political group that hates handouts, is okay with theft.

Must be nice to be white in America. If they were minorities, armed and in a government building, the feds would be all over their asses. Dead or arrested before the day was out

@@paulnowayhosay1883 I consider myself conservative and the Bundy's are a shame to Americans. Sovereign citizens are just as ignorant as BLM rioters.

@@tinysupreme6417 you're better suited for the democratic side.

Why do they think they (Bundys) can just take over public land without paying a lease?

What don't you have?

from the indians? The mexicans?

@@recoswell 🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️💩💩

lol, guys like bundy are the problem with the country. lock this mfer up!!! making MILLIONS grazing his cattle on land that isnt his. privelaged dumb billy bob dbags

BLM was a fake protest, in 2014 BLM was the fight of the Bureau of Land Managment vs the Bundy ranch in texas and they won their fight against the government and now they rebranded BLM to mean BLACK LIVE MATTER; google how it was in 2014 and then 3 years later BLM means something else to confuse and blind you sheep!!

They should go home too

@@aerogorn8668 cuz it’s public land

@@aerogorn8668 read the constitution and you will know

No, they can't. If that were the case there would be no public lands, and thus wildlife would be in jeopardy, grave jeopardy, and we wouldn't be able to enjoy visiting this public lands like public parks.

@@jaygarit9177 you haven't a clue.... As to how corrupt the Obama administration was!

@@jaygarit9177 As an environmental scientist, you have plenty of public land to enjoy that doesn't have to interfere with other's livelihood. If you keep giving up your rights for convenience or "protection", you'll have neither. And to say wildlife would be endangered is not true. Again, coming from someone that has studied and been educated on the issue. Have you ever been in an airplane? Lots of unused land out there for wildlife. Stay free America...to GOD be the glory, always!

@@russellshoemaker4412 I will repeat that endangering wildlife is an issue, no matter what you believe and also to protect the overkilling of certain wildlife as well as certain plants. Sorry, I'm repeating myself, but you don't seem to get it. All of that, land, plants, certain wildlife protections, etc. too WILL and can be endangered.

@@jaygarit9177 To pinpoint one small area to emphasize endangerment of species holds no credibility. This planet is extremely vast. Focusing in on one extremely small area where humans find beneficial use and calling endangerment just isn't factual. Not trying to be a hater, I'm just tired of the masses falling for certain groups pushing humans to stop benefitting from the GOD given resources that are naturally replenished by nature.

BLM was a fake protest, in 2014 BLM was the fight of the Bureau of Land Managment vs the Bundy ranch in texas and they won their fight against the government and now they rebranded BLM to mean BLACK LIVE MATTER; google how it was in 2014 and then 3 years later BLM means something else to confuse and blind you sheep!!

Rolf😂

friends eat pretty good around them folks..dont know if buying everyone in a state half owned by china a burger is needed..

@@perfectfan2006 them folks eat pretty good on the very beef that was free grazed on public lands. Welfare ranchers. I'll say it again, they you, and I, a hamburger.

@@billyparham9868 lol so you charge them by the blade of grass or the bail ? grass is grass but according to the brand commission the cows belong to the brand .not the federal government its an old fight with factory farmers called open rage farm they lease range and others fence it in why do think they made brand laws in the first place . its law there .. welfare my ass ,,,..

@@perfectfan2006 they aren't charged by the bale. Its per head per day. And its pennies on the dollar compared to the price of a hay bale these days.

@@billyparham9868 so you actually think this was about some cows eating some grass that grows back each year?? wow

aka "asshole out west"

Lol those snipers should have just taken him out. making millions off public lands, can we all do it now... nope, but this privelaged pric feels above the law.

And we will!! And do. AMMON BUNDY FOR Governor of Idaho!!!!

Someone has to pay the king's toll. You think the Bundy's could have exterminated the red men?

I agree.

Great point

BLM was a fake protest, in 2014 BLM was the fight of the Bureau of Land Managment vs the Bundy ranch in texas and they won their fight against the government and now they rebranded BLM to mean BLACK LIVE MATTER; google how it was in 2014 and then 3 years later BLM means something else to confuse and blind you sheep!!

Well, I want my rent.

The federalist papers are not law. They were opinions.

Who will clean the streets, keep lighting up, signs up for directions to travel all over the USA, including trails and historic places? And much more....

@@jaygarit9177 .... Because the government uses our tax dollars for illegal activities.... Such as feeding, schooling and housing illegal immigrants... It's really called taxation without proper representation.... So,the corrupt government needs to follow the law's first. Otherwise, why should we?

@@ModelS-gu2tk We should follow the law to be fair to other people, in addition, to stay safe. To put it simply, that is.

@@jaygarit9177 It's a two-way street! And the politicians should never go against the Constitution... Which is a big problem because they do it all the time.

@@ModelS-gu2tk Man you conservatives really love this immigrant hating circle jerk. I guess you need somebody to look down upon.

its federalism laying claim over state right. That idea alone goes against constitutional law.

Mon Rudker these federal government types are bullies. They get their way or they get guys with guns to come after you. This is taxation without representation and an infringement of private property

Read Article 1 Section 8 Clause 17 of the constitution and you will have your answer.

@@jerrybruckhart9134 so the answer is no. It is not federal.

@@toutdernier1384 They claim it, but Article 1 Section 8 Clause 17 of the constitution, prohibits them from that.

@Coelophysis ...Well, if you read the Federalist Papers, you would find out that our founders would not agree with the flaming idiots in the Supreme Court. In fact, they would be demanding that our states FLAT OUT DEFY and nullify the Supreme Court if it made an opinion that is contrary to the Constitution. And the Constitution is very clear that the federal government only has the authority to own what is inside the District of Columbia. And the Supreme Court does NOT have the last say in what is constitutional and what is not. Do you know who does? Our free citizens do. In Federalist Papers No. 46 and No. 78, James Madison and Alexander Hamilton made it clear that our government is NOT the guardian and master of our Republic and Constitution. Our free citizens are.

@Maui Caui ..."actually, national parks are federal land. If clive bundy dared to even touch a Joshua tree or a sequoia on nation park land, his ass would be in federal prison. Our country is getting." .....Actually, no, they are not. They are stolen lands by the criminals in the federal government. And those trees belong to the state, NOT to the federal government. The state of Nevada needs to tell the federal government to go to Hell on this matter while DARING the President to do something about it. Please read the Constitution and its Federalist Papers.

@Coelophysis ..Take a look at Article 1, Section 8, Clause 17 of the U.S. Constitution. It is right there for all to see. And YES states CAN ignore the Supreme Court anytime that it makes a ruling that is contrary to the Constitution. The federal government only has a "limited" amount of power over our states, and that includes the VERY small amount of land that it is "allowed" to own. The Constitution is very easy to understand. It was made for children to master. Meaning, our founders did not just expect the idiots in the Supreme Court to master the Constitution. They expected ALL free citizens to master it. As I said, read exactly what James Madison and Alexander Hamilton said in Federalist Papers No. 46 and No. 78. Or, would you just rather ignore the facts and keep arguing with me? And I seriously cannot see how a state defying tyranny would open the door to chaos. I see it as closing the door on tyranny, instead. What is opening the door to chaos is our state governments refusing to do their job/duty by refusing to tell the federal government and its corrupt Supreme Court to go to Hell any time that they do something illegal.

@Coelophysis ....Article 1, Section 8, Clauses 15 and 16 grants the federal government the authority AND DUTY to make sure that our non-military and non-police citizens are highly armed and trained to defend our nation whether the federal government likes it or not and whether the state of Califonia likes it or not. Yes, I (and our founders) DID say that our Constitution only allows the federal government a limited amount of power. Well, arming our non-military and non-police citizens is actually one of the federal government's duty. As for free speech, and you are REALLY not going to like this fact, the Bill of Rights only restricts the federal government. It has no authority over our states. If you read the preamble of the Bill of Rights, it says absolutely NOTHING about state powers. However, it says everything about restricting the federal government's power. And no. The 14th Amendment never said ANYTHING about the Bill of Rights. However, just so you know. I believe that EVERY state has a provision in the state constitution that addresses freedom of speech and freedom of religion. The Supreme Court NEVER had the authority to get involved with school prayers or abortions. If our states wanted to, they could again make abortions illegal again, allow school prayers, and DARE the President to do something about it. So, YES, state DO have the authority to tell the Supreme Court to go to Hell. Our states and our free citizens are the guardians and masters of our Constitution and our Republic, NOT the Supreme Court, NOT the federal military, and certainly NOT any President. I dare you to read Federalist Papers No. 29, No. 46, and No. 78.

Our founders said that nullification was the duty of our states and our citizens anytime ANYONE in the federal government did something that was contrary to the Constitution. The sniveling tyrants in the Supreme Court may have said otherwise. Well, who are you going to trust? Will it be our founding fathers or the sniveling tyrants in the Supreme Court? I choose to ignore the sniveling tyrants in the Supreme Court anytime that they come out with an opinion that is contrary to our Constitution and to what our founders said.

BLM was a fake protest, in 2014 BLM was the fight of the Bureau of Land Managment vs the Bundy ranch in texas and they won their fight against the government and now they rebranded BLM to mean BLACK LIVE MATTER; google how it was in 2014 and then 3 years later BLM means something else to confuse and blind you sheep!!

knock knock

Knock Knock

No

Knock Knock

Dont we the people own the "Federal land"???

@@kimammons4014 It isn't federal land, please educate yourself by reading the constitution.

@@jerrybruckhart9134 well with all due respect, educate me Jerry

@@kimammons4014 Hi Kim, sorry about that, I should have added the applicable part, although I do encourage people the read the entire document. Article 1 Section 8 Clause 17 pertains to what land the federal government is legally allowed to "own".

You miswe who started this whole thing. Lots of info on a few web sites

Because of overfishing. People get greedy, that's why it's regulated. Public agencies make sure there are fish and wildlife both alive to graze and live in those places, and some for hunters. It can't be, nor is it, a 'free-for-all"

@@jaygarit9177 Well. They're clearly doing a bad job of it now.

@@epicjorjorsnake2525 Yes, I agree.

No, no he didn't just make that up one day. Read Article 1 Section 8 Clause 17 of the constitution and you will have your answer.

It's actually true. The land belongs to Nevada

yes the blm are a bunch of freeloaders

@@ModelS-gu2tk tax dollars and illegals have nothing to do with this

@@wildnevadakid9216 ... to you it doesn't, but in the big picture of the government picking and choosing what to uphold and what not too uphold... they're a lot like crooked politicians, they turned a blind eye when they feel like it and go after you when they feel like it...

@@ModelS-gu2tk yeah I agree with you I want illegals gone too but that just doesn't have anything to do with us ranchers fighting the BLM

@@wildnevadakid9216 so what's your point, what's your angle, just exactly what do you feel about the BLM...? For me the bottom line is this government is crooked... so, because of what happened at Ruby Ridge, and Waco Texas and Bundy Ranch, I feel the FBI and the BLM are completely out of line... And they walk in lockstep with the federal government ... Whether it is along the lines of the Constitution or not... so yes, it all has to do with crooked politicians... and those who are in line with them...

They had video of BLM starting Fires and accusing The Bundies Also in the original agreement the BLM were obligated to keep up the land and remove all the underbrush that causes so many Fires Many California Fires are a result of letting the blown down dead trees and limbs pile up it provides fuel when a fire break's out?

Read Article 1 Section 8 Clause 17 of the constitution and you will have your answer.

I have, and I don't see how it relates... Oh god nevermind, looking at your comment history you clearly are an anti government extremist trying to fill your time getting into dumb arguments on KZfaq. Please, there are cheap courses on law. Do yourself a favor and try to pass some accredited courses to fill your time instead.

@@pelicanantics9812 ​ @pelican antics Ahhhhhh, a liberal I see. The constitution was written for the people to read, not lawyers and judges.

The right to levy taxes is right in the Constitution. Have you actually read it?

Hell yea. Bring those burgers aint no cattle ranchers ruining land anyhow.

The whole terrorist clan is long overdue for prison or a pine box.

There was actually a black man there with the militia.

Which means what?

Whatever get out of here with your pathetic black victimhood fake racism mentality as systemic racism doesn't exist.

Because your a wussy?

@@lightwarrior7365 Because that is what terrorists do. Threaten violence.

Details , details. Heed ye solely to the calling of the Fruitful and Splendid KNOB of KOLOB! He who heedeth the scintillating vibratory drone of the Fabulous and Soul-Saving KNOB of KOLOB, shalt be blessed by a Warm Glow in his thorax. This is the breast swelling TRUTH, O my brothers! All else is FAKE NEWS.

You have stated the "governments" side of the case, and the finding in "federal" court. The details of the situation are, the elite want to get Bundy out of grazing, then they can claim water the rights, which exist because the Bundy Family developed that range since before Nevada was a state. Further more, the BLM is chartered to disperse the federal land acquired in the process of statehood. The BLM is in violation of their charter through out the western states. The "endangered species" is a turtle which cannot survive on this land without bovine grazing taking place in said range. The declaration of the area as a protected environment was, a rouse to further the Reid family's agenda for this land. News organizations rarely give this story the depth required to inform the uninformed about this situation. The BLM were the ones pointing guns at people. If you listen to the recordings of the BLM, they were anxious to shoot and kill civilians. The reason no-one died during this standoff, was the Bundy men and the Sheriff made the BLM stand-down/retreat. The rule of law was made clear to the commander of the BLM. The BLM rustled the cattle here, still a hanging offense. Like Treason. Watch the formal retreat by the BLM. One of my favorite bits of history. Had any civilian pointed a gun at the LEO's present, We The People would be in a shooting war, to this day. We The People elected Donald J. Trump to serve as President of the United States, for the purpose of restoring, and, instituting the Rule Of Law , in this Republic. What the corrupt US government did in our name while we were asleep, must now be set right. The "law enforcement" of this republic, must be brought under control, they have been allowed to run rampant without being held accountable, much too long. Lock Her Up. WWG1WGA MAGA

Cleave ye to the Magnificent and Scintillating KNOB of KOLOB! For he who succors upon the Tumescent KNOB of KOLOB shalt know not thirst. For the Bibulous and Secrescent KNOB of KOLOB shalt pulsate and spill forth refreshing waters, in a pearlescent cascade upon he whose tongue rests in faith upon the Soul-Saving and Splendid KNOB.

Really? This legal analysis tears down all of the arguments and pseudolegal theories expounded by the Utah Legislature and the Bundys, explaining that "the U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly ruled that the Property Clause of the Constitution gives the U.S. government the right to own public lands and keep them public and the exclusive power to decide whether to dispose of them or sell them off … and has also found the government's authority under the Property Clause of the Constitution ‘has no limitations.’" Of note, seven of the eleven Attorneys General who signed off on the Report are Republicans. Report of the Public Lands Subcommittee Western Attorneys General Litigation Action Committee Conference of Western Attorneys General we.riseup.net/assets/459889/2014CWAG-Report-002-1.pdf

The Bundy family is actually not from Bunkerville, Nevada, the site of last week’s tense standoff and home to Bundy’s ranch. According to the NBC news affiliate in Las Vegas, the Bundy family applied to use the Bunkerville Allotment in 1954, when Cliven was 8 years old. Cliven’s father David Ammon Bundy had relocated the family to Nevada sometime after the 1940 census. This particular branch of the Bundy family has their roots in the Arizona Strip, a stretch of rugged land in the northern part of the state. In the late 1910s, Cliven’s great- grandfather Abraham Bundy, a bona fide Mormon pioneer, helped establish the Mount Trumbull community, a settlement also known as Bundyville, in a remote corner of Arizona just north of the Grand Canyon on the Shivwits Plateau. Abraham and his five sons, including Cliven’s grandfather Roy, filed homestead claims under the Stock-Raising Homestead Act (1916) there. Between 1925 and 1940, the family patented (brought into private ownership) close to 4,000 acres in the area and raised cattle. blogwest.org/2014/04/21/understanding-cliven-bundy/

No. You don't need any help with that.

@@joedirt7604 let me guess your a liberal retard who is brainwashed into thinking conservatives are "mean" because your too much of a idiot to think correctly.

But you have no problem with the summer of burning looting and murderers that your side did?

Sometimes people die when there is a stand for freedom and rights. You disagree because you are a lib and hate conservatives. I woud have no problem "losing my life" standing up peacefully for what I believe strongly about. Soldiers do it for you everyday, but your not complaining about that are you.

Dude ain’t about black lives matters your weak incel