@Mean While I had precog dreams between ages 10-18 or so. For some reason, I lost it as I grew older. There are older people in my family who retained it into adulthood.

Non-locality doesn't really exist. Our consciousness exists in any locality it chooses to, if the observer knows how to choose or is open to experiencing other localities without physically doing so.

I feel tho like this guy may be a doctor in the sense that Doctor Dre or Doctor J are doctors

@@ransakreject5221 I love Dr. Dre, but he didn't get a PhD. Accept maybe in funky beats. Lack of respect for his education is the point of my post. ✌️

Many colleges still offer curriculum in the field of parapsychology (Dr. Peter Venkman is one of the original Ghostbusters - has doctorates in both psychology and parapsychology). One can acquire a doctorate in divinity as well- but that doesn’t prove there is a God. It merely means the person has studied the field.

@@DeanHorak omg your wisdom is overpowering. Thank you for your mocking, with this new wisdom I too can mock others. I always wonder are you an American jerk or a bot just looking for trouble.

There's a great fear in these that mock. Psi suggests a possible afterlife - an afterlife creates fear of a possible judgement that many don't like the idea of.

I knew you were going to say that!

I knew that you was going to say that you knew he was going to say that.👍

That one is probably the most common esp event we all somehow experience

This is a very common experience for me as well, or they’ll call me or something like that. In addition, it happens with ideas and concepts: one example I wrote down was talking about Wu Tang clan with a buddy who had never heard of it and then a couple of hours later a person with a Wu Tang clan shirt walks into the locker room I was in right when a Wu Tang clan song starts playing. This has happened with even more obscure topics and ideas then showing up on t shirts, etc. The likelihood these experiences are coincidence, I have them weekly, is probably hundreds of billions to one.

Absolutely this video are place where emerges anti Science ,mis information challatan with good phich proposes. Absurd this Channel vídeo.

@@maxwellsimoes238 *"Absolutely this video are place where emerges anti Science ,mis information challatan with good phich proposes. Absurd this Channel vídeo."* ... Where else do you suggest people should go for better information?

Large-scale quantum effects are very rare because generally they cancel out and the wave function collapses once you have interactions between particles. This is why this is generally not a factor in the macro world.

Absolutely.

There is a video here on youtube, that was about the tests they ran in a laboratory setting using a random number generator specifically designed for the experiment. They went into detail about the methods and final statistical analysis of the results, taking into account all the variables.

@@buddyrichable1 But a KZfaq video is not a peer reviewed accredited scientific journal. Unless your research, results and findings are being scrutinized by scientific peers knowledgeable in the field -- who's sole purpose is to find even the tiniest flaws or inaccuracies in your methods, data collection, analysis or interpretation of results -- then your research is not of the highest caliber necessary to be accepted by the scientific community in general. It is because of such high standards that the science we have today works. There are journals who's worth and reputation rests on not publishing data or results later found to be wrong or inaccurate. For example, the journal, _Nature,_ is one of these. You look at a paper in _Nature_ and you know it's scientific method and interpretation of results are going to be airtight.

@@longcastle4863 I find it remarkable that anyone who asserts the value of peer review research are often themselves guilty of not doing their own research. For example, a simple Google engine search on Dean Radin's official website will direct you to over 100 academic articles appearing in peer reviewed journals ranging from The Foundation of Physics and Physics Essays to Psychological Bulletin, Psychology of Consciousness and Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. Because that was so easy to find, I'm led to believe that your question is a rhetorical one premised on the assumption that none of this can actually be real. It's pretty easy to spot a real question as opposed to the ones that are actually statements. On a related topic, Michael Persinger-the inventor of the God helmet - insists that psi is real despite the fact he used to be a materialist sceptic and Michael Shermer's go-to source whenever he tried to debunk this phenomenon. Persinger also has a lot of peer review on the neurological physics on this topic but it's a bit camaflaged in order to get financing for this kind of research. See the popular video, No More Secrets, a KZfaq video, for an overview of his work. Frankly, none of that actually convinces me that any of this is real. It's my personal experiences that mostly convince me. If you notice, Dean added that creative types typically showed higher effect sizes in psi than the average person or someone who leans more "right-brained" or analytical. Though I love science and studied it at university, I'm also a professional illustrator/artist. So I'm a mixed bag who always has this inner dialogue going on where on the one hand I keep having these experiences and then there's the sceptic in me that likes to test those experiences via sceptical inquiry. Hope that helps

Yes.

Best comment!!😄

This vídeo was made in voo doo because left behind reality sense in real world. Challatan minds of course.

About 20 yrs ago I dreamt my football team won 2-0 and I'm still waiting 😀😀seriously next day they won 2-0, strange lititle things happen in life that can't be explained physically.👍

He explained that it is a small but measurable effect. But Randi's tests required definitive results on a sampling of one.

@@KpxUrz5745 A sample of one subject, yes, but you could have as many trials as needed to detect the effect, however small. If someone really can sense extra-sensory, then she should be able to demonstrate it in this way, but no-one ever has.

You make an assumption about the mental ability that is not valid and that is that the ability ''has to be'' strong or weak or medium sized and that's simply a question that requires a empirical answer and is not a theoretical question. No body would deny the fact that people can hit a baseball with a bat because its not a 100%. The best batters can get a hit rate of 30%, a person who never held a bat in his life would probably have a hit rate of less then 1%, a small effect but a real one.Again the effect does not need to manifest in any particular way in order to be considered real. It is after the fact that we develop theories to explain the facts.

Don't hold your breath :)

The position of most paranormal researchers is that they don’t need evidence- for some reason their claims should not be subjected to the same scrutiny as other claims.

There is a video on youtube about the experiments that he is referring to. They used a random number generator specifically designed for the experiments and collected data over many trials. They detailed all of their findings in the video. I’m sure it wouldn’t be hard to find.

@@DeanHorak But they do have a fuckton of evidence, so what are you on about? Burning strawmen, are we?

@@pandawandas , , They have no evidence. Testimonials are not evidence. Evidence is acquired by producing repeatable, testable results. After decades (if not centuries) of trying to show paranormal is real, evidence has yet to be produced. You can whine and cry and claim paranormal researchers don’t have to follow the scientific method - that somehow they are exempt from having such constraints, but I’m sorry - that isn’t science- that’s pseudoscience. Maybe know what you’re talking about before looking foolish.

Only squizogrenic shows he proposes are real left behind reason in this way Nothing worthless Science. He has serious health problems in other words he are so crazy challatan.

Absolutely correct. And No. All the modern science can do is separate, divide, thus we have discrimination and can define based on contrasts of things and attributes, and this realm is the only place they can ponder with their form of methodology -- most of them today disregard metaphysics even. Acknowledging the One they do not care to engage. From what I learn for example: gravity, sound, energy, light, magnetism are all the same thing just different modalities, but they only seek to understand the parts and not the whole, therefore they cannot properly even understand the parts. Regarding this video topic, they mostly exclude God because they cannot touch, fathom, measure or imagine the One; ESP is excluded because of lack of evidence. We know ESP is genuine, all the ancients were aware, all our scriptures are of.

science is not funded to research ESP, telepathy, remote viewing and clairvoyance. Science is also wrong from einstein onward.

NEVER telepathy are place Science experiente in this sense when telepathy rejected reason Science falied . Telepathy is place where challatan show absurd concept.

Would love to hear about your 2 experiences. I've had a few of my own.

Extrasensory Perception

@Mean While I am not following?

@Mean While I am saying to read the papers yourself, and you are suggesting 'to not try their methods'. What is your point?

In recent years, the term “CONSCIOUSNESS” has been used in esoteric spiritual circles (usually capitalized) to refer to a far more Homogeneous Consciousness (“puruṣa”, in Sanskrit), due to the fact that the English language doesn’t include a single word denoting the Universal Ground of Being (for instance “Brahman”, “Tao”, in other tongues). The word “Awareness” (capitalized) is arguably a more apposite term for this concept. The typical person believes that the apparatus which knows the external world is his mind (via the five senses), but more perceptive individuals understand that the mind itself is cognizable by the intellect. Wise souls recognize that the sense of self (the pseudo-ego) is the perceiver of their intellects, whereas awakened persons have realized that the true self/Self is the witness of ALL these temporal phenomena. The true self is synonymous with Consciousness, or with Infinite Awareness, or the Undifferentiated Unified Field (“Brahman”, in Sanskrit). The dialectic exercise in the following three paragraphs should help one to understand the nature of the fundamental conscious observer, that is, the ULTIMATE observer of all phenomena (i.e. the subject/Subject, which is the authentic self, as opposed to material objects): If one were to ask you whether you are the same person or individual you were at birth (or even at conception), you would probably respond in the affirmative. So, then, what PRECISELY is it about you which has remained constant since conception? In other words, what is the self-identity you had as an infant, which is the present “you”? It cannot be any part of your body or mind, since none of the atoms or molecules in your zygote body are extant, and “you” certainly did not possess a mind at conception. If you are reasonably intelligent, you may claim that your genome is the same now as it was then. However, it has recently been scientifically demonstrated that genetic code can (and usually does) change throughout an individual’s lifetime. Furthermore, nobody actively conceives of their essential nature being a bunch of genes! More intelligent souls would probably counter thus: “The thing which stays the same from my birth to the present time is my sense of self.” This too, is fallacious, since the sense of self does not emerge until at least a couple of years after birth. An infant has no ideation of itself as an individual actor. You may then say “I was a (male/female) human being” but that doesn’t specify any PARTICULAR human (you, yourself). So, then, what EXACTLY is it which remains “you” from conception till death? That is the “I am” which precedes any artificial sense of self. In other words, rather than saying “I am a man/woman/human/king/pilot/etc.”, simply the impersonal sense of “I am”. That is the true self, which is the Universal Self. Therefore, your essential nature is Cosmic Consciousness, usually called “God” by theists (see also Chapter 10). The Tao (The Reality [lit. The Way, The Path, or The Road]) which can be expressed in language is not the REAL Tao. All concepts are, by nature, relative, and at most, can merely point to the Absolute. That explains why some branches of theology use the apophatic method of discerning The Infinite (“neti neti”, [not this, not that], in Sanskrit). Also known in Latin as “via negativa” or “via negationis” theology, this philosophical approach to discovering the essential nature of Reality, gradually negates each description about Ultimate Reality, but not Reality Itself. Ultimate Reality (“Brahman”, in Sanskrit [from “bṛh” - lit. “Expansion”, in English]) alone is real - “real” in the sense that it is the never-mutable substratum of ALL existence. The wisest of the philosophers of ancient India distinguished the “real” from the “unreal” (“sat/asat”, in Sanskrit) by whether or not the “thing“ was eternal or ephemeral (cf. Bṛhadāraṇyaka Upaniṣad 1:3:28, Bhagavad-gītā 2:16, et altri). Gross material objects (such as one's own body) and subtle material objects (such as thoughts) are always changing, and therefore not “real”. REALITY is clearly seen by those self-realized persons who have experienced spiritual awakenings (which occur either spontaneously, or after a gradual process over many months or years), yet only intellectually understood by those who have merely studied spiritual topics (that is, those who have practiced one of the four systems of religion described in Chapter 16, but have yet to awaken to their essential nature). “If you remain as you are now, you are in the wakeful state. This is abolished in the dream state. The dream state disappears, when you are in deep sleep. The three states come and go, but you are always there. Your real state, that of Consciousness itself, continues to exist always and forever and it is the only Reality.” ************* “The ego is the identified consciousness. When the impersonal Consciousness identifies itself with the personal organism, the ego arises.” ************* “The only true meditation is the constant impersonal witnessing of all that takes place in one’s life as mere movements in the universal Consciousness.” ************* “Consciousness must first be there, before anything else can BE. All inquiry of the seeker of truth, must therefore, relate to this consciousness, this sense of conscious presence, which as such, has no personal reference to any individual.” ************* “Insofar as you keep watching the mind and discover yourself as its witness, nothing else can project itself on the screen of consciousness. This is so, because two things cannot occupy the attention, at the same moment.Therefore, delve within and find out where thoughts arise. Seek the source of all thought and acquire the Self-knowledge, which is the awakening of Truth.” ************* “Just as the difference between the space in a pot and the space outside it disappears when the pot is demolished, so also does duality disappear when it is realized that the difference between the individual consciousness and the Universal Consciousness does not in fact exist.” ************* “All there is, is consciousness. That is the Source from which the manifestation has come. ...And the mind is merely a reflection of that Consciousness.” ************* “All there is, is Consciousness, not aware of Itself in Its noumenal Subjectivity, but perceived by Itself as phenomenal manifestation in Its objective expression. If this is understood in depth, there is nothing more to be understood.” Ramesh S. Balsekar, Indian Spiritual Teacher. “As a man who has devoted his whole life to the most clearheaded science, to the study of matter, I can tell you as a result of my research about the atoms this much: There is no matter as such! All matter originates and exists only by virtue of a force which brings the particles of an atom to vibration and holds this most minute solar system of the atom together. We must assume behind this force the existence of a conscious and intelligent Spirit. This Spirit is the matrix of all matter.” ************* “I regard consciousness as fundamental. I regard matter as derivative from consciousness. We cannot get behind consciousness. Everything that we talk about, everything that we regard as existing, postulates consciousness.” Max Karl Ernst Ludwig Planck, German Theoretical Physicist.

But any definition of Consciousness is Self-Defined since no one knows what it is Absolutely. It may be something that does not exist at all. Its like someone says is there Unicorn or Big Foot. These are invented terms

@@1stPrinciples455 Kindly repeat that in ENGLISH, Miss.☝️

@@1stPrinciples455 by that reasoning it could be argued that anything anyone has ever encountered at any time, material or not, might not actually exist, including this very comment that I write and you read. Incidentally all "terms"are essentially "invented".

You wrote a term paper, and left out the detail that AI, will never have, and human intelligence, rarely has. Wisdom. What McCartney, and Simon have, is the supernatural, equivalent to charisma. Outside the understanding of science.

You know what sounds even more bs? Your conciousness yet we all act like it exists with 0 experiments

They are virtual brains, you are correct, well done 😂👏👍

You win!

@@FireHorse489 I'd take a Winnebago! But, I wasn't first.. So, I guess he wins a lifetime of closer to truth shorts here on KZfaq.. Not a bad thing if you ask me.. this channel is awesome.. all their videos so such a low view count.. when it should be in the top 10.. honestly I support any comment or interaction on this channel.. the world needs more of this type of conversations.. it's a joyride for the mind.. love it

First, you missed the point of the video. it's just a conversation. Second, if you listened to it, it is even pointed out that the data is controversial. Third, Dr. Radin admits in the video they are looking for the evidence of a connection between the quantum and physical (in the context of looking for evidence of ESP) because they don't have it yet. Personally, I don't think ESP exists. However, discussing it and having scientists explore it may turn up evidence one day, maybe not. That's what's so great about science, it constantly explores things and tries to make sense of a fantastic universe.

What is?

Who is?

I’m sorry but if your version of science does not require repeatable, testable evidence, it’s not science - it’s religion.

@@DeanHorak Ok? So why did we invest billions in search of dark matter yet have 0 evidence in 30 years for it? Heck ESP at least have some statistical evidence. Is dark matter a religion?

@@janeferess411 , ESP has been debunked over and over again. The claimed statistics have been shown to be biased by researchers or faulty controls. Dark matter is a hypothesis - no scientists claim it is factual - it’s a possibility, so we do experiments to rule it in or rule it out.