For real. This is probably my favorite movie all time, I know the script by heart almost, but I am losing my shit tinnking about how much my brain would have melted if I had seen this scene in the movie for the first tome

You need to get out more.

And then the bit when he says because people think you're me and it flips back to Brad pit, 👌

That was the best moment. But that’s all it should’ve been if it was in the actual film. Cutting Mr. Pitt our for that performance would be a disservice to the experience

That transition would have been crazy in the movie

Casual Introvert yes

And than do one with Dr. Zoidberg replacing Zuckerberg!

This

If you need facial models, FB might be able to help!

Solid idea, honestly do this for any historical fiction

Yup, agreed!

Face off bro

@@alejandrobolanos4655 That would be hilarious haha, but it's Nic Cage so it must be out there already.

I know this because Durden knows this, I am jack's agreeing with you. by the way he says hello.

it should be put into a fan edit

This (deepfake) is the best choice to make this scene better... I absolutely agree!

If this had happened in a movie theater in 1999, I would probably still be in my seat trying to claw my brain out of my head

Agreed

This! Yes! +100

hahaha!

What they were also saying with that line was, "Everybody saw it, but no one ever says anything." It reflects the connection of the film (life) with itself. It also plays on the idea of how Tyler purposely seems to sound like he's slurring his words on the plane where he quietly and calmly says, "So you can pretend like you're interested?" Where you think you might have misheard him like I did the first time where what I thought I heard was "So it can seem like you care?" Because remember "oxygen gets you high" lol. It plays into the Mandela effect idea idea as well and probably much more.

^this

Hector Serrato wrong. This represents mental illness actually. You must not have seen the movie

DENNIS P u obviously didn’t understand what he meant

For that that reason I would have added Ed's face on Brads after Brad confirmed they were actually the same person, but I get why they did it. They wanted you to get a sense that he wasn't sure if what he was imagining was his face or Brad's so they were toggling between both.

flawless

Sam Kershaw I am Jack's fleeting sanity

Agreed, this guy way too good! If i had seen this in the film 20 years ago it would've made it 100x times better!

I prefer just the empty shot of the chair.

SCHRODINGER’S CAT is this like Homer buying shares of Ani-motion?

kingalexcomedy clearly Liev Schreiber, methinks.

Ed norton

Edward Pitt.

I was just about to say that

Matthew Fox

You'd have to put a watermark on the face for any real security.

M Jin like, share, subscribe. Mark my words, this channel is going viral

lol, there will be an app that can do this in 20 seconds within a year or two

@@username4441 Doesn't change the fact that this is really cool right now

​@@Freakshow116 oh, no doubt. very cool. but to suggest that this is in anyway a niche that will last long enough to warrant this man "blowing up" - I disagree. This would be like someone posting snapchat filter videos a little before everyone could do it themselves on their phones.

@@username4441 I appreciate your honesty, but I disagree with the skepticism. Deepfake technology isn't terribly intricate, but to create a convincing image is far more difficult. Plus, your logic is flawed. Things only become wildly available when they become popular enough to warrant mass development. Deepfake is nowhere near that level as of yet. So assuming that it couldn't become popular on KZfaq, a platform where we watch people make homemade everything, is either over-confident in the technology or over-simplifying the way things are made.

@@Freakshow116 I think you seriously miscalculate the sheer exponential nature of what is possible each day. Compare 2019 to 2012, then compare 2012 to 2005. (Also I dont agree that making a convincing image is difficult, there will always be a dataset curated and a model generated for whatever is found to be difficult, as it is deemed difficult).

Ok, that actually made me LOL

Atleast replace him with Jim Carrey or some shit

Replace Jar Jar with Brie Larson and set the internets on fire lul

@@SeeFoodDie god I hope people atleast won't hate her as much as Jar Jar.

Replace Jar Jar with the porno dick that flashes for one frame at the end of this clip

Sabin1981 I know the second it flashed it was from the scene in the theatre where he put the image in the movie. I didn’t even have to slow it down to see it. But I did anyways 😂

@@kevinblah6877 haha! Right?? :D Definitely well played, CSF :D

My thoughts exactly!

Yup

Honestly, I laughed at this transition. It's like taking off glasses

It's already starting lol

@@Bruceybaby2009 Truth.

The misinformation? Nah! The real issue is that, by its very existence, it discredits LEGITIMATE videos. Trump can go out, call all Americans poor stupid swine, then poop on the Bible, wipe on the flag, let it all get caught on film. Then when it goes viral claim "fake news! Obvious deep fake video!"

@@greenpeasuit not just Trump either soon it will be all politicians crying fake when they get caught out, fake audio will be the final nail in the coffin of objective news.

No one lies to God

wtf is that?

It's real quick within the 2:58 time slot

@@alxxx3751 It is. Though it's been known for many years.

Did he add that?

Right?

And then we will truly have come full circle.

Isn't there a weird vocalize type program that can learn to speak and sing if given enough info just like these deep fakes for the face? Just find a body actor and your movies could have A-listers in them.

I want to take his face...off