yeah but BG3 was a no contest really. That game was not only GOTY but one of the best games ever made ...

Fighting orks is good. Recruiting a Bloodaxe mercenary ork companion iZ EVEN BETTA !

Twice? Did you have to use toy box?

@ArminiusSage Nah man pure vanilla

@@carsongriffin5120 pc then? How is it now compared to launch?

@ArminiusSage Haven't played it in a while but last I remember it worked fine

@@carsongriffin5120 so you had no issues? Are you a bot?

They use some of the same art and icons. The Arc Rifle for instance is almost identical.

I’ll take it, you never actually played BG3 and just watched the YT shorts and memes about it? Considering you put “masterpiece of voice work” when the aspects of the game that won it majorities of Game’s Award was more than just the voice acting, you know like the more obvious SFX, VFX, in-depth stories, and most importantly the very rich attention to detail given to everything which you would have known in the first place had you actually played the game

@@SordidusFellatio are you being insulted that someone on the internet haven't given you a free bj or something? Or that I like JA3 music and you can't change that? Which one would that be?:D

"Larian's level of fit and finish" Copium is one hell of a drug. Dude forgot the state of Act 3 when it released xD

If you attempt to do everything in BG3 75hs is barely enough time to get out of Act 1.

If you only spent 75 hours in BG3 then you didn't do everything

It really is dimples, issue is most talents feel pointless or to situational. Then you have obvious must takes.

then you will completely miss out on the best writing, characters and quests in the genre.

Lol it's not common for crpg to be fully voiced, I don't know how you ended up being spoiled

you gotta make a hub planet and chart out warp jumps to it, make it so nowhere is more than 2-4 jumps away

Not every game has to have XCOM 2 Combat, the Combat in rogue Trader is in No means perfect but it's Not Horrible, and No Not all Warhammer Games get praised Like Shot only once that are mid to good, Like Darktide, space Marine, adeptus mechanicus, battlesector dawn of war etc

More like, they didn't have the budget like Larian to do gameplay AND looks/VO. I thought previous Owlcat games looked great for what they were though so I look forward to this as well, just gonna wait for a few bugfixes.

@silentverdict so once again, they choose gameplay over looks. Could have used some budget pointlessly adding voice acting..... didn't though which is literally my point. Call of duty will be the same game over and over again but will look better every time. Because call of duty values looks over gameplay development.

@@tylerlawwill1761 and outside of multiplayer who cares about CoD ? they are soulless games now ... this game looks great and even without voice acting has so much depth and charm CoD never had ...

@jaroslavmihok740 the millions of people that buy it. And "outside of multiplayer" You mean the entire game. You seem to be so dumb you think multiplayer matters more than campaign, and zombies. YOU only care about multiplayer in cod and just like the standard idiot applies that to everyone. "I don't care about the campaign, therfore campaign doesn't matter"

@jaroslavmihok740 and you're so dumb you think I'm talking just graphics. They focused on gameplay instead of pointless things like voice acting and 8k graphics. The game isn't high definition when you zoom in. They made a good game and didn't focus on the stupid fluff, You're arguing against me with my own point and think you're doing something

verifiably false

Computer-rpg I believe

computer role playing game, it used to be a more general term but now its reserved for games attempting to recreate tabletop role playing games like d&d, rouge trader, shadow run, etc. rather than being a video game set in the universe of them it attempts to literally recreate the game inside the computer with certain liberty's taken of course hence the name

Eh, i played Starfield for like 70 hours, it didnt meet the expectation, but to call it unplayable is just terrible hyperbole.

it was playable, doesn't mean it was good XD

starfield is playable. Damnation through faint praise dude.

Playable =/= good or enjoyable. It does just enough.

I dont think gamers understand how important the "veneer," or presentation of a game actually is to them. Presentation is the entire reason you're playing a video game CRPG and not a traditional pen and paper role playing game. Bringing imagination to life is part of what video games are supposed to do. Mechanics, graphics, sound, and animation that's supposed to fill in as many gaps in your imagination as it can, and it's how it sells the experience.

Does this game of the same level of choice as in BG3?

What?

What a ridiculous thing to say.

​@@drugmate9710agreed,the games are awesome, and I'm definitely gonna pick the game up today

But giving Starfield the steam award for most innovative game of the year wasn't hurting the industry?

​@@Selnathorn Are you saying that in order to criticise the two games that were mentioned in the video, I’ve to mention every single game in 2023 that was released in an unacceptable state?

@@akaLuckyEye_G It is disingenuous to atleast Baldur's Gate. Even with the faults mentioned, it was above everything that ususally gets barfed out in the triple A industry. So calling something that did it better than the rest hurting is like calling the kid who got a B- on a test, while the rest aimed for a D, a failure.

​@@Selnathorn Something is not automatically good just because you think it’s better than something else. The only information one could gather from that is your personal taste in games. But more importantly, I’m not talking about good and bad games. I’m talking about the condition a game is released in. The conditions BG and RT were released in were unacceptable. Yes, other games were released in worse conditions. But there were also games that were released in much better conditions than BG and RT. In your analogy you state that BG was graded a B-, while the rest aimed for a D. You never graded the rest and even if you meant that the rest received a D, it would mean that they passed. I guess it depends on where in the world you live but in Sweden D is even one above a passing grade. To use your analogy to explain my point. BG aimed for B and the rest aimed for E, the lowest passing grade in Sweden, but both got F (Failed). Because again, I’m talking about the state in which a game is released, not what the game one day will be when it’s patched. It’s not a good analogy though because we’re talking about companies whose goal is to earn money by selling products to consumers. Not children being schooled into society. The standard for a product, people pay for, should be higher than “being better than Activision, Ubisoft or Bethesda”. If you enjoy and like BG just say so. It’s 100% ok to like a game that was released in an unacceptable condition but rewarding a company for it is hurting the industry. You’re telling the company that it is acceptable behaviour and in the worst case scenario the company will one day become just as bad as the rest.

You have MASSIVELY misanalyzed that situation. The "drop" in quality is overstated greatly in both cases. Act 3 of BG3 alone could be GOTY, but it's not as good compared to Act 1 overall. This isn't an "industry issue".