I have several of Jim’s books. But the one that I think everyone should read is Person of Interest. Amazing stuff! He talks about the fuse which is the time line before the birth of Christ and what was going on in history. Then comes the explosion, Christ on earth. After that the fall out. What happens next. What changes because of this explosion. The life of Jesus changes the world forever. His light is the enlightenment of mankind. All of this is explained in great detail in Jim’s book, Person of Interest. Dear Lord please let J. Warner Wallace continue his work. Keep him safe and healthy. I think he still has much to contribute that you Lord have given him to share with us. Amen!

... Jim made this video 6 years ago; it's just excellent - worth a million views, but - in this post enlightenment civilisation of ours few people seem to appreciate: enlightenment Thank you, Jim; you've got that toughness - someone to stand with when the going gets rough. Kind regards Kim

I appreciate this video.

Polycarp has to be the funniest name in ancient history.

brilliant

Just read the bible diligently. Proverbs. John. Easy start God Bless You all. I love you all.

Here is an interesting fact. When religious take their vows it is vows of poverty, chastity and obedience. This directly relates to the reasons Jim mentions for crimes....greed, lust and power. Which makes Christianity a non-threatening religion. So why are Christians persecuted? Answer: because the persecuters are the ones after money, sex (abortion, contraception, homosexuality, divorce and remarriage, and peodophilia), and power. And the Christian viewpoint threatens that.

AMEN!!!

Excellent.

One of the reasons the bible is so important is because it allows you to actually read the writings of the original witnesses. Someone might argue that they were brainwashed into deeply believing by a charismatic cult leader but we actually have the words of the witnesses and can judge for ourselves whether or not the disciples were coherent witnesses of actual events. The rambling of cultists is fundamentally different from the deep wisdom of the bible, as different as bitter poison is from clear water, and that is how we know the witnesses were and are reliable.

The last point about Christian entertainment was worth the trip.

Although im sad for your Italian hands im glad for my ears

The chain of custody is more dependent on the early part than the later part? Why? That's certainly not the way a chain works. All links are equal. So how does knowing less about the purity of an idea as time passes somehow support forensic science? The data disintegrates, but it doesn't matter? That's not science.

SUGGESTION...THE ANSWER TO LOOK INTO HAS NOTHING TO DO IN OR W CHRISTIANITY BUT IN EVIL AS IN AN EXISTING SATAN.

Is this the full explanation?

🍻👍

Intelligent design is what he is saying. Intelligent design is faith. It is not science. He is saying faith proves faith. Great if you’re presenting as a pastor but not so much as ‘cold case’ detective forensics.

Wallace should rename this to 'Low Bar Christianity' because that's what he has succeeded at here, lowered the bar for evidence just like literally every other apologist out there. He claims that eyewitnesses are direct evidence but what he's also not taking into account is that eyewitnesses that are used in legal proceedings are vetted and verified before they are taken into court record as admissible evidence. It's clearly obvious that he sought and still seeks to advance his career as an apologist rather than a detective and this is obviously why he's created these low bar arguments that would not be admissible in a court of law without vetting or verification.

It was garbage when William Craig said it, and stealing it from him didn't make it any better.

Hmmn, JWW has me a bit puzzled; he makes a good case for the trustworthiness of the Gospels, and yet as a 'Protestant' he appears to have overlooked things that Jesus is recorded within the New Testament/Gospels to have said and instructed - including transubstantiation, 'This IS MY BODY', this IS MY BLOOD' - also "I tell you truly, unless you eat of My body and drink of My blood you will not have life in you" - John 6:53. The issue of ONE CHURCH - in front of the cave known as the gates of hades/hell Jesus gave Simon Peter/Petras the authority to speak in His name, and by inference and tradition that would have been understood by Peter and the Apostles, an authority handed down to successors, until that 'Key' gets handed back at the second coming of Christ - upon this 'rock' {singular referencing to authority] I will build My Church {singular]. "Whose sins you shall forgive, they are forgiven them: whose sins you shall retain {withold forgiveness from], they are retained {witheld]" - John 20:23 [The institution of the sacrament of Confession] How many different 'Protest-ant' churches do 'we' now have, and 'authorities' and 'interpretations', since Martin Luther and Henry VIII, Calvin and the like decided to do their own thing?

I think that this case is the base of hate war on religions .The refuted jews shold apologised the Allah for thier missconception fath that they had success the Essa as hanging after them on crossifixtion .Because Allah released the Essa as and thier mother respectfull persanality and informed thier death after passing long life .And Christhens also believed on Essa as called them God fatheer and mother .God Almighty rejects thier fith And informes that i am one no one is my partner i have no nead any son and niether i am any father of any humans .Unfortunatley the muslim also conccept the Essa as has sitting alive on the sky and they will came in last era .But God rejects thier faith .Because many kuffari Mecca and refuted yahoud and Qureesh had demanded to Hazrat Mohammad saw that you go on the sky and bring so education books for us came infront of us eyes .Allah Teaches The answer of refuted peoples against that You Said them your Enimies Never any peoplel went on sky befor this time nor i can go .Because Allah the God is fullfill his in his promises do not go against his promises .If we submit the conccept of christen and muslims ulamah of this century are right fiath then you will go against the promised .And refuted peoples alligation or blame on Allah orders that Allah may go agaist his promises .Never Allah go his promises mumtaneh this for Allah .Do not wait for Essa as coming agian Allah can appointed the Nabi in HZrat Mohammad Saw Ummah other humankind as Immam Miahdi which has came for you wellfare .Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Masiah sani in 14 Th century .jazakallah .

These christians live in such a weird fantasy world.

Another xtian salesman

I gave this 35 minutes on my drive home and I give up. This is nonsense, pointless dribble. His entire premise is that the age of an account is primarily based on what the alleged author does or doesn’t include in his account.

There is biblical justification to disregard biblical hell as so much hot air: God can force people's constitutions to change even if they start out opposed to him, which apparently means he isn't bothered by any need to "respect" human freewill: 33 "Immediately the word concerning Nebuchadnezzar was fulfilled; and he was driven away from mankind and began eating grass like cattle, and his body was drenched with the dew of heaven until his hair had grown like eagles' feathers and his nails like birds' claws. (Dan. 4:33 NAU) And hell cannot be literal because God can use his magic wand to make sin, for example adultery and its consequent death-penalty disappear into nothingness: 13 Then David said to Nathan, "I have sinned against the LORD." And Nathan said to David, "The LORD also has taken away your sin; you shall not die. (2 Sam. 12:13 NAU) At my blog I show that J. Warner Wallace fails miserably with his attempts to make the evangelical doctrine of hell-fire sound more plausible to those who naturally recoil from it. Wallace never takes the time to consider that maybe one reason even Christians can hate the idea of eternal flaming hell is precisely because this sense of justice contradicts the sense of morality that the Holy Spirit placed in their hearts. Wallace is not writing for anybody at all, except other bible-believing evangelicals, who adopt most of his presuppositions anyway. He only cares that they buy his crap, he does not care about the fact that his arguments evaporate like butter thrown into the sun, when confronted by informed atheists like myself. Wallace is no less of a shameless self-promoter than apostle Paul. Indeed, how could the Holy Spirit have guided Christians into theological truth for those 20 centuries before Wallace's pay-as-you-go "forensic faith" gimmicks? turchisrong.blogspot.com/2017/09/this-is-my-reply-to-article-by-j.html

The ingrained bigotry of evangelicalism. They make some fantastic cases for Christ, then out of the blue they feel the need to try to trash the Book of Mormon, with limited knowledge or information on this topic. It’s so sad that you have to trash another person’s faith just to try to booster your own. Lee Strobel does the same. Besides this there has been some commendable research for this talk and book.