People accustomed to the brainwashed disinformation of the Colombian media when confronted with the truth will say something like this!!!

@@malayerba71 Theres always two sides of the story, and this comment is clearly not happy with the other side existing 🤷🏻‍♂️.

Like the so call "Gente de bien" people so disconnected to the reality of the country side and marginalized communities. Those people are ok letting paramilitaries run rampant killing anyone do they can have their roadtrip. There no such thing as other side, the UN and human rights watch made it clear, the government has committed violation of human rights. The only side is that the Narco State has done absolutely nothing for Colombians.

@@MrAlen6e “Gente de bien” People of good faith that instead complaining gets to work to get what they want from life, this is the kind of citizenship that the world needs. Instead of giving excuses on why your life is miserable get to work and give value to your community, innovate and use your resources. The Government doesn’t own you anything except security for your property and the safeguard of your rights. Do you think is fair for the people who owns stores and a family business to get wrecked by these insurgents because “They don’t get enough?” These people only want to loot and destroy. Stop acting with entitlement, If you want a better future, then act on it, you are the only responsible for what you get out of life.

Other people are not "willing" to leave in peace, they are lucky to have the opportunity to live in an area the government has decided to keep safe. This is only in the big cities and tourist areas. The rest of the country is left to fend for themselves against the well-armed cartels and paramilitaries who are fighting for control of the drugs. The people from these communities have no option of living in peace.

by the way this documentary is wrong. they refused to acknowledged that the Farc has been offer over 100 different peace deals that they violated since the early 80's.

@Mayukh Basu ????!!!!!

@antonio so tell me an example of that agenda? the saudis and their allies got mad because qatar wasn't playing ball and stayed close with the turks and iranians. then the saudis just accused them of sponsoring terrorism and the US and the west is too happy to play along with that, and they imposed very strict sanctions, you would know if you flew qatar airways because their airspace was almost fully blocked after years and years it failed to break down the qataris, and now the saudis and americans are acting as if nothing happened tell me, what terrorism? and aljazeera has not a drop of connection to that. their female reporters don't even wear the hijab. in their coverage of the taliban they have no opinion on the strict islamic rules. don't just swallow what you media and government tell you. find out the facts. a lot of the times these things are geopolitical moves, but sold to you as "for democracy/freedom" or whatever dream you believe in

@antonio it’s fine to hate the qataris for exploiting indians. But that’s a totally separate issue on why you claim al jazeera to be bad? What did they do wrong? Your arguments don’t add up.

I love the intro.

No.