Reminded me of the reasons I made two one 10$ and one budgetless.

Steven would sniff it out.

Keep on mana rockin in the free world and doot doota loot loot *extends mic*

@@austindizzle33 doot doo

Thank goodness

( :

This is totally true. Gary was cast for the cheap!

He didn’t return his land to hand on the original cast either, wasn’t that a symmetrical effect? Edit: he didn’t pay anything for the encore he only exiled a card and Gary, never payed the encore cost. Tbf it’s a new mechanic and Araumi is a wall of text and he’s thinking about what plays he’s making.

@@matttownsend8406 i have araumi and i have made the same mistake

@@drazi3356 that’s fair, I was just pointing out that yes he made a mistake, but I’m not judging as it’s easy to do with new cards that have new mechanics that are also a wall of text. It does look like dmir graveyard shenanigans deck which I would say is usually the golgari area. Looks fun.

As is usual, they keep forgetting to read their cards, and miss important things.

Justin: let me read Araumi Jon: starts reading Araumi out loud Jon: uses Araumi incorrectly Justin: is good.

No U

LOL I thought Jon had a rivalry with Stephen

I think Jeremy’s deck is the worse of the 2 as the bouncing of the lands stopped them playing, if that didn’t happen they would’ve been able to put creatures into play and kill him. Justin’s deck again forces you to essentially pay life to play. Again if people could’ve established a board they could’ve raced the damaging effects to kill them before they were taxed to death. Tho playing against staxx isn’t something I would like, some people do like it tho. Tbf Jon played a Staxx deck a long time ago and literally nobody else could play it was draw pass for all of them except Jon as he stopped them Untapping lands so essentially the same as bouncing them here.

I love it

@@dudemcguy7608 like, it really sucked for Steven, but his spells wouldn’t have done much against that board anyway. Just a bad draw for that particular game. The way they had to play around those enchantments and really stretch their limited mana as far as they could made for an exciting game.

He targetted Jons commander with it.

I Gotchoo: articles.starcitygames.com/videos/commander-vs-226-commander-legends-round-3/

Jeremy had the strip mine play to protect his Sanctum. Stephen hit Morphin Pool over Serra Sanctum with Star of Extinction which was confusing though. John did have the most control over the table at the time though.

@@captainfry9776 The Priviledged Position was in play by the time Stephen cast Star of Extinction.

@@CA-zn8hu D'oh! That's right, ty

I absolutely disagree. The game was entertaining as hell to watch!!

Yep! articles.starcitygames.com/videos/commander-vs-226-commander-legends-round-3/

No, you need 4 targets. The spell isn’t countered unless all targets aren’t legal. So it was fine the first time it was cast.

You need all legal targets for cast (true for any spell), but only one legal target for spell/ability to resolve (true for all spells/abilities). This is ofc only applies to spells/abilities with the actual wording "target".

They played it correctly. Decimate does not fizzle if one of the the targets becomes illegal as the spell resolves. Decimate only needs all four targets when casting the spell. If a target becomes illegal before the spell resolves it will just resolve as much of the ability as it can. "608.2b If the spell or ability specifies targets, it checks whether the targets are still legal. A target that’s no longer in the zone it was in when it was targeted is illegal. Other changes to the game state may cause a target to no longer be legal; for example, its characteristics may have changed or an effect may have changed the text of the spell. If the source of an ability has left the zone it was in, its last known information is used during this process. If all its targets, for every instance of the word “target,” are now illegal, the spell or ability doesn’t resolve. It’s removed from the stack and, if it’s a spell, put into its owner’s graveyard. Otherwise, the spell or ability will resolve normally. Illegal targets, if any, won’t be affected by parts of a resolving spell’s effect for which they’re illegal. Other parts of the effect for which those targets are not illegal may still affect them. If the spell or ability creates any continuous effects that affect game rules (see rule 613.11), those effects don’t apply to illegal targets. If part of the effect requires information about an illegal target, it fails to determine any such information. Any part of the effect that requires that information won’t happen." Every instance of the work "target" would have to be made illegal in order for the spell to fizzle.

He cast jared at end of Jons turn. He went to next turn and attacked

Ya but he never got to use it

Also Gary is a creature so you forgot to put a land back into your hand after cheating.

Can't watch anymore, y'all are cheaters.

There are plenty of errors on Stephen's part this game, and that was not one. He play Jared on Jon's turn. When it got to his turn he can get it back because it's a new turn

@@dantebeleren Ah good call I missed the Savage Summoning. Thanks!

What’s wrong with the decks?

@@dudemcguy7608 100% agree

Yeah, how come he's not using headphones?!?!