Communion in the Hand and Liturgical Reforms: What is God's Will?

No video

Communion in the Hand and Liturgical Reforms: What is God's Will?

Рет қаралды 10,040

Күн бұрын

Timothy Flanders interviews Bishop Athanasius Schneider about his new book: Flee From Heresy
A Catholic Guide to Ancient and Modern Errors: sophiainstitut...
In Flee from Heresy, Bishop Athanasius Schneider - raised among persecuted Catholics in the Soviet Union - offers a systematic treatment of more than 130 doctrinal errors, from ancient times down to our own day, along with English translations of the Church’s major anti-heresy documents of the past two centuries.
In this fascinating exposé, you will discover the ideological roots of our own unsteady times and be better equipped to “test all things; hold fast what is good” (1 Thess. 5:21).
- What heresy is - and what it is not
- A sweeping history of heresies across the centuries
- How heresy destroys charity and the spiritual life
- Why God allows heresy to afflict His holy Church
- Names and categories of more than 130 doctrinal errors
- The nefarious heresy of the anti-Christ and the anti-Mary
- How heresy relates to schism, apostasy, and excommunication
- Why the Virgin Mary is invoked as “Destroyer of Heresies”
Help us DOUBLE latin masses!
🎁 GIVE: latinmass.com/...
+ WATCH EPISODE 1: • MASS OF THE AGES: Epis...
+ WATCH EPISODE 2: • MASS OF THE AGES: Epis...
+ WATCH EPISODE 3: • MASS OF THE AGES - Gua...
+ FIND A LATIN MASS NEAR YOU: tlmfinder.com
+ PRAY FOR US: Email film@latinmass.com to join our dedicated prayer team.
+ FOLLOW THE MASS OF THE AGES DOCUMENTARY
/ massoftheages
/ massoftheages
/ liturgyfilm
/ massoftheages

Пікірлер: 98

@lyndapisano6373 Ай бұрын

That was fabulous bishop Schneider! We love you and need your spiritual teaching !

@bonniesammons2348 Ай бұрын

Absolutely made my day. Thank you thank you for such clear teaching, so very needed. Bishop Schneider is a true shepherd. Even if he were the only one left his "voice" would help me keep the Faith no matter what.

@marie-noelledp3073 Ай бұрын

Oh my God ! Bishop Schneider is amazing ! He is so caring for us... ❤❤

@samiamnot8906 Ай бұрын

Don't use Our Lord's name in vain. I can't believe that here, in 13 days, nobody has corrected you. You need to be more careful.

@JulesAMI111 Ай бұрын

What a wonderful and illuminating interview with our beloved Bishop Schneider. Thank you Timothy. God’s blessing to you both.

@EpoRose1 Ай бұрын

God Bless Bishop Schneider! A true shepherd of the Church!

@JustUsCrazyBoyz Ай бұрын

Bishop Schneider came here to my lay community here in The Philippines last month where we say the TLM. He had a very inspirational sermon where he told us to bare up with being marginalized for now and God will restore the Latin Mass especially if we prayed hard enough! Such a Holy Man!

@julianpaschinger5343 Ай бұрын

Bishop Schneider , deo gratias🙏🏽

@rosariolm3619 Ай бұрын

Greetings from a faithful following family from the Netherlands!!!!!!!

@doortjem5739 Ай бұрын

Greetings from the Netherlands, too 😊

@lorraineklimek1677 Ай бұрын

My admiration and respect for Archbishop Schneider is immense. Particularly, even when he is correcting others, he does so with charity. I remind myself of his example when I found myself feeling anger or outrage about current controversial events going on in the Church.

@1907jdee Ай бұрын

Excellent clarity from Bs Schneider. 🙏

@Paweł-u2h Ай бұрын

Watching from Poland! 🇵🇱

@MichaelPeria Ай бұрын

Thank you for this interview. This clears lots of confusions that I had in mind.

@zalobo Ай бұрын

PRAY, PRAY, PRAY FOR THE TRUE CATHOLIC TLM OF OUR LORD, JESUS CHRIST !!!!

@dianesimoes8943 13 күн бұрын

Thank you for correct info.

@kadi1100 Ай бұрын

Watching from germany ❤️‍🔥🙏🏽🌹📿

@karlheven8328 Ай бұрын

Er ist der beste deutsche Bischof (in Kasachstan aber er ist deutsch)😊❤

@kadi1100 Ай бұрын

@@karlheven8328 er ist wahrhaftig ein Segen für die ganze Welt. Ich weiss nicht welche Staatsangehörigkeit er hat. Geboren ist er in Kirgisistan :) Und dann später mit seinen Eltern nach Deutschland gezogen

@karlheven8328 Ай бұрын

@@kadi1100 Ja, seine ganze Familie ist deutschen Blutes.

@Josef_Fritz Ай бұрын

Thank you for this video .Great teachings,

@albertritchot5393 Ай бұрын

How can Catholics will low levels of catechesis recover what appears to have not been taught in the last 50 years or so the Faith? Must we go back to pre-Vatican documents to get a more realistic and truthful teaching?

@Greg-ei6lv Ай бұрын

Read the Catechism of the Council of Trent

@albertwaigwa8652 19 күн бұрын

I bought and I’m getting to know well The Catechism of The Council of Trent or better still Catechism of st Pious X what a difference of Clarity especially on the uncertain areas

@bbcarve53 Ай бұрын

Hello Tim what is the name of the 12 volume catchesis series that the bishop mentioned

@TheGringoSalado Ай бұрын

“Even a blind man could see.”

@ClavesCoelorum Ай бұрын

With all due respect to His Excellency, the argument that "Psalm 42 wasn't said at every Mass before 1965, and the Last Gospel wasn't always said at every Mass before 1965, therefore abolishing them entirely in 1965 is entirely unproblematic" does not follow. Firstly, it was only the 1960 Code of Rubrics that tinkered with the opening rites of Mass (i.e. abolishing them entirely if something such as a blessing preceded it) and decreed the omission of the Last Gospel when something followed Mass, e.g. Absolution at the catafalque). Some things were begun by the Pius XII Holy Week "reforms" in 1955 in a limited way, that is true. But they became applied generally only in 1960. Secondly, the fact that Psalm 42 was not said in Passiontide or at Requiems doesn't mean or justify that therefore it should NEVER be said. It was omitted (or, as some may say, never introduced) on those occasions for particular reasons, in CONTRAST to the ordinary rite of Mass where it would always be found. The omission of something as an exception to a rule does not mean that the rule is superfluous.

@NoryJaneChristine Ай бұрын

Communion on hand is Mark of the Beast together with Lay Minister and Blessing of Non-Communicants. It is the buying and selling in the Altar Rail or Communion Line. This is why Our Lady of Akita had a mark on her right hand while The Visionary had a mark on left hand which she said is due to communion on hand

@ciaran6171 Ай бұрын

Gosh. Sounds like +Schneider isn't 100% on board the Vatican II Sunshine Bus. Can anyone let me have the number of the DDF?

@judithmcrae3704 Ай бұрын

How can one pray for the intentions of the pope when he is promoting heresy?😊

@katiekuchar6014 Ай бұрын

God’s will is for us to obey the bishop of whatever diocese we are in.

@samiamnot8906 Ай бұрын

What if the bishop is a wolf?

@Dim-yz6wk 7 күн бұрын

@@samiamnot8906 Exactly . Deus benedicat tibi ✝️🛐🛐🛐

@suegreene1 Ай бұрын

It's not the same, I asisted many Novus Ordo Ad Orientum, the comunion given in the tongue, but it felt empty..And it was given by my friends of a Franciscan Community. those were the times I was far away of the Catholic Church, because I went through a dissagrable situation when I was 12 years old. When I rediscovered the Mass of the Ages, I understood what had happened and what I missed.

@simonwesteng3610 Ай бұрын

Without any foreknowledge of `tradition` (and change of tradition), I have always intuitively received the Blessed Sacrament not by taking It with my fingers and then to my mouth but I have always offered up the palm of my hand for It to be placed therein from where I myself elevate It and receive It directly upon my tongue. As a lover of God, I see this meathod as the most loving way of initiating `Holy Communion`. In other words, just as the earliest tradition did, I have continued this particular practise, seeing this as the most natural, reverent and intimate manner of receiving My Eucharistic Lord.

@TeM203 Ай бұрын

If we only realised who is He, hidden under the appearance of a fragile host, the Holy of Holies, Almighty God, we would never approach him standing and reaching out with our hand. Out of fear and loving reverence. Especially, as many eucharistic miracles shown, it is His wounded sacred heart we receive.

@dan_m7774 Ай бұрын

He told us to reach out and take, then eat. It is unfortunate to obey Christ upsets people.

@TeM203 Ай бұрын

@dan_m7774 you should do more research and reading before judging who is obedient to Christ and who is not. Read church fathers, lives of saints. Even old testament, ark of the covenant, who could touch it? Here is more than the ark. Nearly 2000 years of church history.... they were all years of disobedience to Christ you say? I do not want to debate but I pray that our Lord Jesus will lead us on a straight path and keep us in his heart. In the end it is only between us and God. Let's focus on this relationship with Him. God bless you.

@dan_m7774 Ай бұрын

@@TeM203 The early church you received by hand. Christ was touched constantly in crowds. Remember the Apostles being dumfounded why Christ asked the crowd who touched him? Receiving on the tongue was a novelty introduced as a man made way of showing respect. The Ark was prohibited to touch, because God said not to touch. God did not say do not touch the bread. You are to obey the Church if they restrict how to receive you obey. If they allow various ways, then don't disobey by claiming otherwise. To do so is to disrespect God, thus making you unworthy to receive in any form.

@albertwaigwa8652 19 күн бұрын

@@dan_m7774 please Read The Catechism of St Pious X then also listen to Bishops other podcast about “ take” verb and it’s loosely translated form from Aramaic into English.

@Dim-yz6wk 7 күн бұрын

@@TeM203 Deus benedicat tibi ✝️🛐🛐🛐

@kathleenfrancis1872 Ай бұрын

The guy that hands out Jesus in The Most Blessed Sacrament almosts drops it. He's a great guy but not even an extraordinary minister.

@Pukhelykopter Ай бұрын

So: is the conclusion then, that catholics are receiving a damaging Eucharist in every Novus Ordo Mass?! is that Bishop Schneider's message?! Converts from protestantism/evangelicalism being fervent Catholics now - as converts are - receiving a damaging Eucharist all the time?!!! Appreciate an answer... Thx for the video.

@alexisarrizon6799 Ай бұрын

Is it still live

@tomsdigest Ай бұрын

Pius XII's condemnation of "liturgical archeologism," or Benedict XVI's "once sacred, always sacred" principle? Pick one, can't have both

@saetainlatin Ай бұрын

Hopefully Bsp Schneider can address Michael Lofton's criticism of his latest book Credo, in which according to Lofton Bsp Schneide is redefining the word schism.

@austinkent8811 Ай бұрын

What is there to address? Bishop Schneider gives a definition that is not the same as the actual definition from canon law and the traditional theological loci, this is simply a fact.

@femaleKCRoyalsFan Ай бұрын

credo is an amazing catechism.

@samiamnot8906 Ай бұрын

@@austinkent8811 No he doesn't, I just checked it. Pages 78/79, same definition as canon law.

@austinkent8811 Ай бұрын

@@samiamnot8906 yes he does: Schneider: “Who are schismatics? Those who received baptism, yet have been separated from the unity of the Catholic Church by refusing to recognize the Supreme Pontiff or have canonical communion with him and the other members of the Church (e.g., the Orthodox).” Canon law: “schism is the refusal of submission to the Supreme Pontiff or of communion with the members of the Church subject to him.” Schneider redefines from “refusal of submission” to “refusal of recognition”, which makes sense given he holds water for groups that are schismatic according to the Church and this redefinition would make those groups no longer schismatic.

@Cato_the_Christian Ай бұрын

@@austinkent8811 “Q. Who are schismatics? A. Schismatics are those Christians who, while not explicitly denying any dogma, yet voluntarily separate themselves from the Church of Jesus Christ, that is, from their lawful pastors.” -Catechism of St Pius X. A lay catechism can have a definition that is not identical to canon law and still be true and efficacious for the one being taught.

@tomsdigest Ай бұрын

Ruh roh, don't tell Kwasniewski that "saying the Secret and the Embolism out loud are not substantive changes!"

@tomsdigest Ай бұрын

"When those holy hierarchs, preachers of Christ, and defenders * of the Gospel teachings and Orthodox traditions had received in themselves * the divine radiance of the Holy Spirit, * they proclaimed the supernatural * pronouncement openly * to be their conviction inspired by God, * namely the Creed, which is concise * yet defines the true faith sufficiently. * Clearly these enlightened and blessed men, receiving from on high * the revelation, declared to all * the decision taught by God." (Byzantine hymn for the Sunday of the Fourth Ecumenical Council) Just one of many examples that's a very far cry from Bishop Schneider's frankly Modernistic reductionism of conciliar spiritual authority, which somehow posits the Holy Spirit as a great unknown with just a few disparate manifestations in Church history. In any other era, "2,000 bishops gathered in ecumenical council said X" would've very much been taken as "the Holy Spirit has expressed X," without some sort of "Well, did it meet some very rare conditions of negatively-protected dogma defined at such-and-such a level only distinguished in the 19th century"

@austinkent8811 Ай бұрын

Why does a random auxiliary bishop’s opinion matter? The Church says communion in the hand is allowed, case closed. To claim the Church has erred on this matter is no different than the Protestants who claim the Church erred by moving to exclusively communion on the tongue.

@doortjem5739 Ай бұрын

You need to learn when and why they allowed communion in the hand. Case is not closed. If you belive that Christ is king and that He is a real in The Communion then you would never ever want to touch Him with your unworthy hands..God bless you.

@marccrotty8447 Ай бұрын

Austin. Consider attending the Canonized Latin Mass and moving away from the "made by committee in 4 years" Novus Ordo rite.

@PadraigTomas Ай бұрын

"...out of reverence towards this sacrament, nothing touches it, but what is consecrated; hence the corporal and the chalice are consecrated, and likewise the priest's hands, for touching this sacrament. Hence, it is not lawful for anyone else to touch it except from necessity, for instance, if it were to fall upon the ground, or else in some other case of urgency." So said Saint Thomas Aquinas, *Summa Theologica*, Part III, Q.82, Art. 3. His opinion carries more weight than any of us.

@austinkent8811 Ай бұрын

@@doortjem5739 I wouldn’t want to touch him with my even more unworthy mouth either, thankfully he offers himself to us in spite of our unworthiness. I don’t remember saint James giving an in depth treatise on the evil of our hands either.

@austinkent8811 Ай бұрын

@@PadraigTomas his opinion carries less weight than the official disciplines of the Roman pontiff, who has changed the discipline in force in St Thomas time. Also kind of awkward considering Eastern priests don’t have consecrated hands and never have, and Roman priests didn’t have consecrated hands until well into the Middle Ages, that ceremony isn’t even native to the Roman Rite, it’s a Gallican accretion: