I used a HP15C when studying math late 80s. While everybody was using their fancy BASIC calculators, I computed zeroes of functions, matrix calculations and complex computations. They had to write software for that :-)
@RandallHayter2 жыл бұрын
I still carry and use my 10C. When I bought it in 1983, I couldn’t afford the 11C, much less the 15C. Truth is, over the almost 4 decades since then, I haven’t really needed the features that would have been included in the more expensive models, but that doesn’t keep me from wanting a 15C.
@paulholbach37163 жыл бұрын
I love the "Voyager " Series...I have several 12Cs, 2 x 11C and one 15C. Like the 11C the most. Looking back, the 11C would have been offering more a bit more features than I needed at school / university and my profession.
@garanceadrosehn96912 жыл бұрын
I have two of the original 16-C's which are still working. The first one I bought myself when it was first released, and in the last 35+ years that I have owned it I've had to buy batteries for it only twice.
@mrgadget14852 жыл бұрын
Yep, in the original model, the battery consumption was the lowest. It's quite incredible really.
@nezbrun8723 жыл бұрын
You're right the 10c is good enough nowadays, anything more than that I would typically do on the computer. However, that doesn't stop me using the 15c anyway!
@mrgadget14852 жыл бұрын
In terms of quality and overall value, there will never be anything like the Voyager series.
@karlbergen68263 жыл бұрын
Years ago I had an HP 11C that was unfortunately stolen I was able to trace it to the pawn shop it was sold to for about one tenth of its value. I was unable to recover it. The 11C was quite well publicised when it came out and in the late 1980's was a popular calculator. I think what killed the 10C, 11C, 15C was the HP42S which had a similar logic only you could see what you were doing. It also killed the HP41. The HP28S eventually murdered of the HP42S only to be killed by the HP48SX which would fall to the HP49G/GX (GX had expansion cards). The GX had a long life until about 2000 when the HP49G came out. It was soon replaced by the hp49g+ and then the HP50g. The HP50g lasted a very long time. I still have an HP50g. I also have android Emulators of the HP50g that I usually use saving wear and tear on my real HP50g. I still miss the HP11C that got stolen.
@4034miguel Жыл бұрын
Hi. Thank you for making these videos about these great calculators. I love my 10C. It was always a challenge to do programs with so little memory. I liked the idea to see if i could make a smaller Fibonacci and here it is, taken advantage on how the stack, LAST x and some instructions behave. Jus for the fun: 01 0 02 PSE 03 1 04 + 05 LAST x 06 PSE 07 XY 08 GTO 04 Note: PSE acts as an ENTER. Last x is great to keep the previous result, which the program accomplishes with 07 and 04. So, it is really always showing the previous result. Cheers.
@Scanito2 жыл бұрын
Thanks CC for this great video. I currently have in my HP calculators collection: HP-12C, HP-15C, HP-16C, HP-32s-II, HP-41CV and HP-42s w/infrared printer. Love each of these models as they are part of history. I use the most my HP-42s and enjoy programming it.
@MrWaalkman2 жыл бұрын
Big fan of the 15C. I've got several different calculators, mostly HP and TI, but I still use the 15C.
@CalculatorCulture2 жыл бұрын
Yeah it's one of the greats.
@paulmanhart4481 Жыл бұрын
I bought a 15C, or 12C (can’t remember) back in 1983. Loved that calculator. They have a HP emulator for this calculator so you can have it on your desktop. It’s free. In 2004 when my father passed away, I found a 15C new in box in his closet. I was so happy because mine had given out. These are excellent calculators and expensive to buy, even used.
@mrgadget14852 жыл бұрын
For some reason HP still makes the 12C, but not these scientific calculators even though they are almost the same. I would definitely buy the 15C if they made it.
@eighteenin782 жыл бұрын
You are probably aware that a company called Swiss Micro currently makes 11c and 15c reproductions for reasonable costs. I believe they function identically or better than the vintage original HPs but there are minor differences about them I am not partial to. I would prefer to find and buy a near mint original from the 1980s.
@mrgadget14852 жыл бұрын
@@eighteenin78 , thanks! I actually bought a used 15c. It was expensive but I love it :)
@borlibaer9 ай бұрын
This means, the 28C was the logic development of the 15C. Where the 11C was the robust scientific programmable for on site usage. The 48sx was the super programmable of the 42S and the son of the 41. Why the 32S and 32SII? Looks like there had been a constant upgrade development of hp calculators like VOLVO did.
@MrTPF1 Жыл бұрын
I had an HP-11C when I first started in my mechanical engineering curriculum in the 80's, but then I shifted to a used HP-41C after my first year all the way to the end. Though the 41 Series was much more popular at my school, I missed the simplicity and ease of carry in a jacket or shirt pocket of my 11C. I just couldn't afford the 15C at the time.
@CalculatorCulture Жыл бұрын
Yeah there is something very appealing about the Voyager form factor.
@dogone72624 ай бұрын
If you have a Voyager calculator on your work desk - any competent person will respect you. It signals your care for quality and accuracy - and that you know what you're talking about. Make sure you stay on top on how to use it - especially 12C users, because you are surrounded by assholes on a daily basis. A 16C will kill all resistance if you are a serious programmer, and the 15C will rise admiration among the academically oriented girls. The 10C will not get you laid, but you might if you tell them that is the most rare (and desirable) calculator on earth. The 11C is more or less expected to be in the inventory of any serious friend.
@CalculatorCulture4 ай бұрын
😆
@mrgadget14852 жыл бұрын
Most people would never need even all the functions of the 10C.
@neffk Жыл бұрын
The fry in the audio is literally vibrating the sides of my cheap-ass file cabinet.
@CalculatorCulture Жыл бұрын
Yeah the audio is my newer videos is a lot better.
@MiltongoncalvesdoamaralA-lp7hi Жыл бұрын
Onde eu consigo uma calculadora 11c
@abdullahalajlan5663Ай бұрын
I lost my mind or this, Prof. Brain Cox !!
@CalculatorCultureАй бұрын
The Prof Brian Cox of calculators? Sure, I'm totally onboard with that :)
@abdullahalajlan5663Ай бұрын
@CalculatorCulture your voice and the why you talk are really identical. Anyway, I bought it, Prof. Great content, BTW. I'm more into financial calculators, but I came across out of curiosity. Keep it up👍
@andrewh35032 жыл бұрын
about how much faster are trig operations on the 15C than the 11C?
@CalculatorCulture2 жыл бұрын
They are the same speed - they have the same processor.
@oldtechie68343 жыл бұрын
I love old HP calculators for memorabilia but these old calculators are good only for simple arithmetics. the user interface is just too troublesome for complex number and matrix handlings.
@CalculatorCulture3 жыл бұрын
Yes if you use complex numbers and matrices on a day to day basis you might be better off with a 42S or newer calculator.
@karlbergen68263 жыл бұрын
@@CalculatorCulture Let me recommend the HP50g. It can be had for free by installing Emu48 on an android device. The emulated device on android has a more visible screen because its backlit.
@JaapVersteegh3 жыл бұрын
"How that worked"... It's still working, isn't it ;)
@cosicave5179 Жыл бұрын
My hearing is not good but I caught every word of your evaluation of the Ti67. But here, unfortunately, the sound quality is far worse and I've stopped watching very early on - which is a shame because I really wanted to know the differences.
@CalculatorCulture Жыл бұрын
Yeah the sound on these early videos was very bad.
@chrisblum8358 Жыл бұрын
The CC on this video works nicely if you want to read along...
@MiltongoncalvesdoamaralA-lp7hi Жыл бұрын
Preciso de uma calculadora 11c
@Theeshingles3 жыл бұрын
Hi I love calculators to and 1 comment atyyy
@SignalRauschen3 жыл бұрын
awful sound
@CalculatorCulture3 жыл бұрын
Yeah I had issues with my sound quality on the earlier videos. Apologies for that.