Thanks, you too!

Thanks for watching!

Yes! Thank you!

Amen!!

I’ve done reviews and I think comparisons on each. Believers maybe for me, but I like both

I thought I did a couple of years ago. It may have slipped thru the cracks. Thanks!

Just picked this one up after trying it out from the library. I think it pairs good with the MacArthur Commentary. MacArthur hits more heavily on Theology while the Believer's Commentary provides more spirituality and clarity in its commentary, particularly in a Jesus-centered inflection on OT scripture. I very much enjoy it.

@@wolfman7284 Having more than one commentary or study Bible is a good thing because God will lay on the heart of each writer different things. My pastor is David Jeremiah. When he came out with a study Bible, I looked up a passage in it, and the same one in MacArthur's. MacArthur had one line, and Jeremiah had a little paragraph. (Another time MacArthur had a paragraph, and Jeremiah had one sentence.) Together you can get a good and full understanding of a verse or passage. As you noted, a difference between MacArthur and Evans. They all complement each other.

I’ve done a few. I don’t do links however.

Biblically sound

Don’t like that either.

I’m not sure if I’m calvinism or Dispensationalism. But here are some things I found interesting. If God would have painted a yellow stripe on the backs of the elect I would go around lifting shirts. But since He didn’t I must preach “whosoever will” and when “whatsoever” believes I know that he is one of the elect. - Charles Spurgeon I believe the doctrine of election, because I am quite sure that if God had not chosen me I should never have chosen him; and I am sure he chose me before I was born, or else he never would have chosen me afterwards; and he must have elected me for reasons unknown to me, for I never could find any reason in myself why he should have looked upon me with special love. -Charles Spurgeon C.H. Spurgeon Autobiography (ed. Banner of Truth, 1962) Charles Simeon’s (Calvinist) conversation with John Wesley (Arminian) It is instructive in this connection to ponder Charles Simeon’s account of his conversation with John Wesley on December 10, 1784 (the date is given in Wesley’s journal): Charles Simeon: “Sir, I understand that you are called an Arminian; and I have been sometimes called a Calvinist; and therefore I suppose we are to draw daggers. But before I consent to begin the combat, with your permission I will ask you a few questions.… Pray, Sir, do you feel yourself a depraved creature, so depraved that you would never have thought of turning to God, if God had not first put it into your heart?” John Wesley: “Yes,” says the veteran, “I do indeed.” Charles Simeon: “And do you utterly despair of recommending yourself to God by anything you can do; and look for salvation solely through the blood and righteousness of Christ?” John Wesley: “Yes, solely through Christ.” Charles Simeon: “But, Sir, supposing you were at first saved by Christ, are you not somehow or other to save yourself afterwards by your own works?” John Wesley: “No, I must be saved by Christ from first to last.” Charles Simeon: “Allowing, then, that you were first turned by the grace of God, are you not in some way or other to keep yourself by your own power?” John Wesley: “No.” Charles Simeon: “What, then, are you to be upheld every hour and every moment by God, as much as an infant in its mother’s arms?” John Wesley: “Yes, altogether.” Charles Simeon: “And is all your hope in the grace and mercy of God to preserve you unto his heavenly kingdom?” John Wesley: “Yes, I have no hope but in him.” Charles Simeon: “Then, Sir, with your leave I will put up my dagger again; for this is all my Calvinism; this is my election, my justification by faith, my final perseverance: it is in substance all that I hold, and as I hold it; and therefore, if you please, instead of searching out terms and phrases to be a ground of contention between us, we will cordially unite in those things wherein we agree.

@@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa He's also a Cessationist who does not believe in the Baptism and Gifts of the Holy Spirit.

@@jeffnasta4650 And I certainly disagree with him on that.

Wiersbe or Jay Vernon McGee

I’m a huge Tony Evans fan , His kingdom marriage series was the vessel which saved our marriage, Recently finding John MacArthur , I haven’t stopped learning. He’s extremely convicting.,, God Bless in Christ Jesus

@@TheAerovonsTony Evans does have GREAT teachings... but just be weary, the way in which he got with his current wife is very suspicious to me (she used to be married to a co-pastor that led with Evans at one point) .. and then the way it was announced that he was marrying her shocked his own children when he made it a spectacle on stage. And now he's "stepped down due to an undisclosed sin." And they are talking about reinstating him& doing a church repentance so he can come back... All while keeping this mystery sin a secret from the congregation. He needs to come clean and repent properly before we can move forward with him.

That is true. But reading what a commentator says can help clarify difficult passages. After all, they make their living studying God's Word, so do not discount them completely.

Tony

Oh or are you referring to MacArthur being Calvinist? I don’t know anything about Evans.

@@SaneNoMore Just Bible doctrine.

@@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa Thank you for replying but that didn’t clarify much for me. I was under the understanding that these two men were reliable in essential doctrines so your statement threw me for a loop hehe. I will have to assume you mean your soteriology is different I guess. As a traditional (some say Provisionist) Southern Baptist I am not personally a Calvinist like MacArthur nor am I fully Arminian (I believe Eternal Security to be biblical) So I guess technically I don’t believe you are saved the same way MacArthur does but I’ve just not heard it expressed that way before.

@@SaneNoMore Yes, I agree with them on much, disagree on some. Both are non or anti-pentecostal and I’m Penteocstal.

lmao. if you think that matters you really need help

@@christking85 changing the wording of vital doctrine scriptures does matter.

@@sinceremilkoftheword9754 your ignorance of Bible translations is funny. Yes ones like the passion translation change passages. Others do not. The kjv has mistranslations. You should really do some research and use non biased sources. Mike winger has videos about them. James white has videos and wrote one the best books called the king james controversy. Don't be ignorant.

@@christking85 I won't suffer garbage versions who attack the blood of Christ, or remove important words (like "Lord") frivilously. Such as in Colossians 1:14 and Romans 3:25. They muddy up the blood atonement through faith in Romans 3:25, they don't make it clear like the KJV that the faith must be in the blood in order to receive the atonement. You can read whatever you want. You can read the Quran for all I care. Call it scripture for all I care. But just like the Quran you're not gonna convince me that all of the Bible versions are scripture. They are perversions.

@@christking85 a new version makes Jesus a liar in John 7.

Dakes Gods Plan for man maybe.

Jon courson's is my fav

Charismatic Chaos by John MacArthur

Pentecostal charismatics are apostates!

@@timmorelandthat was a good book. Also strange fire

Seducing spirits and doctrines of devils. You have been a victim.

I'm not saying you're not saved.

I believe in this. Anything beyond is noise: _But we do not want you to be uninformed, brethren, about those who are asleep, so that you will not grieve as do the rest who have no hope. For if we believe that Jesus died and rose again, even so God will bring with Him those who have fallen asleep in Jesus. For this we say to you by the word of the Lord, that we who are alive and remain until the coming of the Lord, will not precede those who have fallen asleep. For the Lord Himself will descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel and with the trumpet of God, and the dead in Christ will rise first. Then we who are alive and remain will be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air, and so we shall always be with the Lord._ 1 Thessalonians 4:13‭-‬17 This states, with clarity to me, that believers in Christ will not be swept away before the antichrist comes to power, but will have to endure that test until the coming of Jesus. Mathew 24:22 explains that the days of the antichrist reign on earth will be cut short for the sake of the elect, for if they weren't, no one would survive. This proves, to me, even the elect will have to endure the tribulation.

So why shouldn’t it have been done? They’re both popular, and most people studying Scripture can only afford 1, if that. So I try to give information so they won’t waste their money on something unneeded.

@@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa Reviewing it, my comment seems rude. But the point of it is that they are vastly different; personas, and theology, to say the least. Yes I realize that Evans is very popular, but that also applies to many others so that reason shouldn't apply here.

@@Mojo32 I had a certain purpose in mind for the review, which I explained. I wasn’t grading the type or validity of each mans theology.

Where does he say that?

@@user-mj9ti4zz8c No answer and he didn't.

Nah. I just learn where they’ve learned a little bit, discard the rest. God bless!

@@NewLifeOfAlbanyGa Your promoting both men on your channel. Who don't stand firm in the word of God though. 2 John 1:9-11

I’m not a fan of this guy and his kjv stuff but honestly him showing these commentaries you can’t hate on him about. Especially John MacArthur who is a great pastor.

@@thomasK411 John MacArthur said you can take the mark of the beast and go to Heaven which is false and will take everyone straight to hell with him if they do not REPENT AND BELIEVE THE TRUTH Revelation 14:11 (KJV) And the smoke of their torment ascendeth up for ever and ever: and they have no rest day nor night, who worship the beast and his image, and whosoever receiveth the mark of his name.

@@charlesmiller3496 Please site where and when he said this. It never happened.

More John MacArthur worship

Got some examples? (By the way, I do like both of them.)

Disrespectful

John MacArthur fanboy smh. This is what happens when John MacArthur is an idol😔

Filthy comment.

Microcephaly is a real condition but there is hope for you, OP. Hang in there!!

Paul taught against this very kind of foolishness in. 1 Corinthians 3. Sounds like idolatry to me.

That’s sad. You went to false teaching just because of a pastor. Get that pastor off of God’s level.

Really? I have heard him refer to many, many church fathers, and of ancient Christianity. Is it hatred to warn sinners of their sins? Jesus did, so He must be the biggest, hate-filled person in history according to you. His message is a message of care and love.

​@@OrondeBMacArthur won't leave.

​@@user-mj9ti4zz8cMacArthurs " ministry" is called Grace to You but after hearing and reading him, it should be renamed "Shame on You" Ministries. MacArthurism is a cult.

Then you don't know the truth. If you do, you wouldn't be making this comment.

It’s obvious you don’t know the truth

I’ve done a comparison of the Moody with them!