Cheers my dude!

Thanks so much dude! Wasn't the best day for one with such a clear sky, but it's a great spot for it! Keen to visit again!

thanks my dude!

Thanks so much dude! So glad you found it useful. It will definitely speed up your workflow working on a new macbook :) hope it goes well!

Thanks so much dude!

Thanks so much Marty! So glad you're finding them useful!

@@TKNORTH doe stimelapse 6.01 not read canon .cr3 files?

Oh true! It can definitely happen, especially if something is moving quite quickly, waves for instance. Here I’m quite far away from the boats so that helped. But definitely slowing down the shutter more will help too, ND filter sometimes needed!

Basically two main reasons for me 1. You have far less control over your shutter speed - it will often either start really fast (looking jittery without smooth motion blur) or end too slow (really increasing your interval and ramping the speed of the timelapse. I still use this if I’m not available to change my settings or sometimes I’ll still just change the ISO for example. If the light isn’t changing as much it can still be super useful though. 2. LRtimelapse is great as getting rid of the flickering, but it’s not perfect. If the light is changing a lot, eg sun going in and out behind clouds / buildings, it will really start to jump around all over the place. A manual sequence will have a much smoother luminance curve making it much easier for the software to process and fix any flicker in post. So ultimately depends a bit on the scene - sometimes you’ll get a similar result, but sometimes it just won’t look anywhere as nice and no where near as smooth. Trade off I guess. Often you’ll get a much better Timelapse just a bit more effort involved. I do regularly use both though! Hope that’s helpful 🙂

@@TKNORTH Gunther had a app for ramping exposure and other settings (based on geo location). But iTunes removed it, so I am stuck to easy mode A priority :)

You sure can! Flickering as you mentioned you can usually fix, but the motion itself won’t look anywhere near as smooth. Especially on a sequences like this one where the light changes quite dramatically. So it’s just a bit of a trade off which is more important/practical for you depending on the situation. Aperture priority can work great, I use it a lot especially when the light is changing less. Or if I know for whatever reason I won’t be able to stand by and change the settings I’ll still use it. But where possible I’ll stick to this method as you’ll get a much better end result and can be worth the extra effort 👍🏼

Hi there! It’s really hard to know without seeing your computer so I have a couple of things you can check just to make sure... 1. Make sure you’re on the right visual workflow tab in LRtimelapse. 2. Make sure the sequence was shot correctly all in manual and not adjusting too quickly (this means it should automatically recognise it as a holy grail clip). 3. Make sure you’re on the latest version of LRTimelapse, this way you can always select “force holy grail sequence”. 4. Even if it was shot in aperture priority or other methods not using the holy grail curve you should still be able to level it out quite a lot and get rid of a lot of the flickering just at the final stage by using the Deflicker! Not sure if you’ve tried and checked all these things but they are all I can suggest 🤞🏻

Thanks, will check!

@@TKNORTH You won't believe what was the problem... The folder that contained the set of pictures had special characters (é, á, ü...), since I'm not English, and name them using my mother language. I don't know how , but as a last resort I changed it, and now all is back on track again.

BTW, great vid, thanks.