Consequences of Decentralization

Consequences of Decentralization - Daniel Treisman

Рет қаралды 9,864

7 жыл бұрын

Serious Science - serious-science.org
Political Scientist Daniel Treisman on political decentralization, tax breaks for businesses, and Russia’s budget problems in 1990s
serious-science.org/consequenc...

Пікірлер: 33

@moisesmartinez5703 3 жыл бұрын

When you see no option other than governments or corporations to run society.

@wajahatsaeed9602 Жыл бұрын

State Government can also be weakened by further decentralization.

@Hobbit0nCN 4 ай бұрын

Fiscal decentralization has strong evidence showing its benfits in reducing both corruption levels and the negative effects of corruption on the economy.

@javadtaghavian3140 Жыл бұрын

now I believe in decentralization even more than before🤣

@flyaway6646 2 жыл бұрын

We have to run a test server in a local town with population of 50,000. To see how it affects the society.

@mjellafcn1024 6 жыл бұрын

who was that at 1:45? Charles who please?

@murtazarizvi5178 5 жыл бұрын

Tiebout

@pierren___ Жыл бұрын

Decentralization is the main reason for 1. Criminality and 2. Privatization

@rekindlefitness Жыл бұрын

An argument against decentralization from a Californian, we all know how well his ideas are turning out for his state 🤣 this is the best video to promote decentralization!

@pierren___ Жыл бұрын

California is not centralized. Thats shy it struggle so much to restore order

@roseoid9672 2 жыл бұрын

wish i was the riddler lmao

@rodrigopintof948 Жыл бұрын

In summary this guy thinks decentralization is bad in some cases because it will take power of corrupted central authorities (aka modern monarchs). Bitcoin is hope!

@pierren___ Жыл бұрын

The contrary. Decentralization gives power to private properties which leads to monopolization and thus appovrishment. We NEED to focus on atteining national power

@emil.jansson 4 жыл бұрын

Decentralized goverment is much better for the people but not for this guy and the rueling class.

@maestrovic42 3 жыл бұрын

@@erseshe militias, guerrilla fighting and an armed population is actually a better way of defending a territory against a stronger enemy. (Colonists vs British Empire, Spain vs Napoleon, Spanish militias vs fascists, Afghanistan vs USSR/US, Vietnam vs US, etc.)

@maestrovic42 3 жыл бұрын

it is also one of the reasons why Hitler didn't want to invade Switzerland: they have an armed population and organised militias

@maestrovic42 3 жыл бұрын

@@erseshe why would technology require centralization?

@maestrovic42 3 жыл бұрын

And by the way, military operations can also be provided by private enterprise, which could complement militias if there weren't state armies

@maestrovic42 3 жыл бұрын

@@erseshe I was only considering political centralization, so I agree with your first point. On the latter, I have to say decentralization does not equal isolation, and cooperation is of course preferable