Yeah they shouldn’t of let him keep the license. He’s a death case on these roads and doesn’t even wanna know.

If the driver of the car with 4 passengers in the back made that many mistakes and didn't accept they were wrong with the police watching them then imagine what they are like normally. That driver should have been made to retake their test. Terrible driving!

I would guess 2009/10 as the van was new in 2008 and according to DVLC it hasn’t been taxed since October 2010.

"Traveller"

​@@andrewharvey6400 🥧 🔑

I am guessing she is a Traveller, they generally don't care for our laws.

@@laurastuart3814 pretty much lax with their kids too

SWEDEN: My bicycle has brakes... :p

AUS: How about a Jack Brabham BT62R engine has been extensively modified and has a power output of 515 kW (691 hp; 700 PS) at 7,400 rpm and 492 lb⋅ft (667 N⋅m) of torque at 6,200 rpm Hellcat and Citroen would still be sitting at the starting line. Top speed: 330km/h (dependent on gearing) Hellcat top speed 203 mph, Citroen Berlingo top speed 172km/h

​@CarlaMWard- Weird way to flex your knowledge on the power outputs of those cars, but okay. Attention seekers these days man. 😂😂😂

She doesn't seem to value her children at all. Very sad.

3 points off a licence is heavy and could get your licence suspended. But, only if the offence has been done multiple times

56:10 She was sent to prison for 2 months for driving whilst disqualified though.

that is the penalty. write to your mp or better still the minister of transport. but you won;t will you?

i think its ignorance of the consequences.. hard to understand though. @@Zephaeria

Its' more expensive in NZ OUR laws are very strict especially with young children

3 points off is heavy, but only would come in play and get her license suspended if committed the crime again.

She should be charged with something more serious put through the courts and jail time especially first time offenders.

You might find that woman with the kids is a Irish traveller she's so ready with excuses, life of a traveller!!!!

She needs to be in jail.

I once saw a truck with a sign that said “if you can’t see me I can’t see you”. I’ve never forgotten it and consider it every time I’m behind a truck.

Who said she was staying in the middle lane ? She was overtaking. The truck driver admitted fault.

She was minding her own business driving in her own lane and the driver pulling into her lane and hit her. She didn't hit the lorry. If you had watched the actual episode, you would have seen and heard the driver admitting it was his fault and that his lorry hit her because he didn't see her.

Yeah.. because Police have hundreds of trhousands of officers or civilians available to dothis and millions of pounds to impound vehicles whilst its done. Be real. Idea world.. maybe.. in practice.. non starter.

*Collision. Accident implies that no one is to blame. Theres always someone at fault when it comes to RTC's.

@@MrDjvariety1 : Nitpicking! It can be both an accident and a collision.

Need longer stringers to cover 2 lanes fully.

@@SJC49 frfr

No

@@Pen-sq7bj Oh, you must be one of them!🤣

@@SJC49it wasn’t just the length though. It was how slowly they removed it after stinging the van which meant the cops had to stop.

Yes the points and fine system in the UK is very weak. About the only offence that sees totting up appears to be vehicle defects (i.e. 3 points per defect).

@@tangomoggynoengi8518,points tot up with repeat speeding offences, regardless of severity eg. Three miles over the limit on an empty road in the middle of the night will get the same points as twenty over the limit in busy traffic. Automatic cameras don’t distinguish.

@@juliebrooke6099 Yes but you are not likely to be getting more than one speeding offence at any one time. However, for every defect that your vehicle has, you will receive x number of points. I know that for each tyre below minimum tread, you receive 3 points. So if you have 4 bald tyres, you would receive 12 points in the one hit...!

It’s a member of our travelling community. They have different rules!

Agreed, and at approx 56.09 in the final commentary roundup they said she’d a two month stay in prison, so hopefully a lesson learned.

its just a shame about the duplicate episodes that keep getting uploaded :S

That what I was thinking. He seemingly has the phonetics down well enough they think he understands more than he does.

Are you joking? Whether he speaks English or not, surely common sense and driving experience should make him aware that you don’t just join a motorway without waiting for a suitable gap or by building up to appropriate speed

Exactly why I say he needs to retake his driver's test. He's clearly lacking the basic skills of driving@@wlove3838

Absolutely

death messages.. the worst part of the job. I have been slapped across the face.. rushed at and pushed violently.. those that scream its untrue and I am a bitch for giving them false news, people who cover their ears and won't let us in in the first place.. plus once, a lady whose long term same sex partner died in hospital. They were a long term couple of over 36 years. No different to a long marriage of course. That was my first solo death message decades ago. I had to keep walking past the house to compose myself. I never smile inappropriately but my nerves made me keep smiling. no way I could knock on the door like that. I went and hid in an alley for 10 mins to pull myself together. then went to the door. On opening it the lady said. oh.. Mary is dead isn't she?.. I still had to establish i had the right people but swiftly and I said yes, I am very sorry to say she is and she said she was glad and relieved because her loved one's suffering was over. That was pure love of course. You can never ever predict how anyone will react - to anything actually. So, despite being very empathetic and sympathetic and diplomatic and kind with people it can go pear shaped.. very quickly.. people are all different. . We were trained that all sorts of reactions are possible.. that was so true.

It varies between policies. At one time policies often covered drivers on other vehicles third party only with the owners permission but that’s rare now. Most people are only insured in their own vehicle these days. It’s a driver’s responsibility to read their insurance paperwork and to understand it. If they are unsure they should ask their insurance company. It’s not the police officers job to explain insurance to people. As I was told when I was a teenager ‘ignorance of the law is no excuse. If in doubt ask’.

Police do know it of course and at the point of the accident how is it the Police who have to point out the obvious about vehicle insurance? All drivers should know this or have no business being on the road driving. What is your point about that remark? Who said the machinery was 'at fault'? I missed that bit. Everyone knows about driver error. AND.. hazards.. other vehicles and condition... both of the roadway and the weather .. even sunshine blinding someone momentarily. That individual doesn't understand it.. there you go.. welcome to the varieties of life out there.

why is the role of the police to explain vehicle insurance to eejits?

Hopefully he learned something from this.

Undercorrecting is also common, they just correct way too late and end up hitting a barrier.

The real problem is that when people pass their driving test, they conform to the bare minimum capabilities to be allowed to drive unsupervised. They should improve their driving skills through experience from then on, but instead many peoples capabilities only decline.

No🙂

He wasn’t on the other side. He went off left of the carriageway he was driving on. UK left hand drive.

He is obviously a Brit

This episode first aired in 2009.

He was acting, yes.

He did say they legally have to leave room and can’t do a solid block without lots of authority 6:00

Soft lad using emojis like a five year old?

No way! He’s top notch!

A bit excitable but he's OK.

It depends on Divesion if is a high-risk puirsuit they wouldn't be paitent and they will attempt to end it.

I saw the baby…

You’re blind.

Because violence isn't used here often. There are armed forces which are basically SWAT in the UK but instead of carrying big guns, they carry pistols. The big guns are reserved for extreme riots or raids. Some normal patrol police, typically in crowded cities like London, carry tazers.

And that explains the enormous amount of gun deaths in your country. It's not something to be proud of.

@@odd_shoes are you really that stupid. Guns don't kill people. People kills people. You can put a gun on a table and it will do nothing. It takes a person to make a gun go off.

@@odd_shoes I hope you’re not American 🇺🇸 😂

Love the sarcasm.

"Why do people who barely speak English, SHOULD NOT HAVE A LICENSE" I think you best hand yours back if you have one.

Does that include you?

See the joke here was: The guy was saying people who can barely speak english should hand back their license. He was doing this whilst speaking english pretty poorly. Hope that helped.

Or piss off back to where their language is spoken

@@louislouis2525A lot of these people with these opinions can barely speak the language they’re trying to dictate.

lets not lol your police are trigger happy and shite as fuck

US police are know worldwide for being the worst trained, thugs and bullies and a pack of John Wayne wannabees.