Hahahahahaha

You can only measure , average power because it will fluctuate a lot and can not be measured easaly, but the Pi 5 will use somewhat more power because the power supply is also 27 watts.

​@@ronaldhofman1726I think the op is taking about energy consumption. For that you'll capture all of those fluctuations and integrate over the time of the application. You'll then have a number that captures all of that

Was less nerves, more too much redbull just before a shoot 😂. Enjoy your Pi 5!

Yes Standard Pi's running Wildlife or Surveillance software will run quite well on PI 3's or 4's, while they are not trying to Browse Web as Well, confined to a single piece of Software Pi's can last a while on Battery Supplies, Its what I look for, but I also use "Friendly Electricals" a Firm on Ali that has the Lowest Powered SBC's, not as well supported as R-Pi, as per these Plug in USB PC's to Run Retro Games in a Stick you plug into a HDMI Screen to use, a Quad Core, even more low-powered than a Pi .. All I am Saying this "SALES PUSH" from R-Pi is a bit late, they flooded KZfaq & Social Media with Reviews, like always they hide we bits we care about, while trying to "make-up" for lack of Supply with a Slightly better Model of 4b, when it needed to be something more..

Of all the hand movement jokes I give this one a solid 9/10

I have used a Pi 4b daily as a desktop and development environment for the past couple of years. I have a Ryzen 7 mammoth system sitting next to me that I turn on maybe two or three times a week for running a flight simulator. The reason for this, is I really love the silence of the Pi 4 as well as of course the power consumption, 2-4W average draw compared to 50-180W draw for the ryzen system. To use it as a daily driver, I have made it very snappy by cutting back on visual goodies, it's a very simplistic visual setup which I am aware would not appeal to many users. The Pi 5 I am really looking forward to, for me it will be a direct upgrade.

The pi can't hold a candle to a proper PC performance wise. For people who aren't specifically makers who don't care much for the superior I/O, it still has the space advantage, a better power/performance ratio, portability, and lifespan. In all the browsing I did in prep for a pi 5 battle station, I found that a good minimum viable total system cost is around 155 USD. That's for the pi itself, a mouse and keyboard, a cheap 32GB micro SD card, a small monitor, a cord with a mini HDMI lead, and a small heatsink. Most people have at least one of these things, like a spare micro SD card or old mouse, and you can also plug it into a TV. Plus, you can always get a previous generation pi if you don't need the performance capacity of the pi 5. On average, the cost will be less than that of even the cheapest new laptops, and only slightly beaten by the refurbished machines market, and those usually don't last as long. A mini PC for that same kind of money will probably be among the many that run the AMD A9 9400 APU. Raw performance wise, it's actually not that much better than the BCM 2711 from the pi 4. The pi 5 with its new BCM 2712 is pretty much on par from what I can tell from all the prerelease videos. It may even be stronger. RAM wise, 4GB is plenty for a casual desktop experience and office work on any Linux OS, though I will always recommend getting the most you can afford unless you have a specific use in mind. Mini PCs scale better with budget size, as that money goes into the choice of hardware. But for the pi, the bulk of the hardware is predetermined, so beyond the board itself, extra money goes into peripherals or luxurious addons like a nice case or LED strips. Were it not for the lack of a true plug-and-play experience with the pi compared to any cheap rig that runs windows, it could easily be among the best value for money on the lower budget end

Ill give this one an 8/10 for the Italian joke, a lot more creativity in this...

@@Core-Electronics honestly, i didn't even think of it as an italian joke. I just had a mental image of him flapping sauced noodles on a fork while complaining about something nobody asked about.

A little bit of motion sickness, but they are good now!

​@@Core-Electronicscringe

that's what im saying lol

@@qozia1370 relax

Neil Peart, Jon Bonham, Buddy Rich 🤘🥁

Awesome! Thank you!

We used an 8GB model for these tests.

I present a third option, too much Red Bull before an early morning shoot. 😓

What will you do with it?

You can use the raspberry pi in a desktop computer environment to work in and develop all the code without another computer. Projector through the hdmi and camera through either the MiPi connector on the board, or a usb webcam would work as well. Sounds like a really great project, best of luck!

Too much coffee ! 😀

Must be from Italian family

We're a multicultural nation 🍝

Agree. Great and interesting vid, but the presenter's 'animation' is rather distracting :(

Ha-ha, I kept expecting the cards to fly through the air, the next moment!

No go for broke!

Totally dude, stop waving your arms. Adderall?

I thought I was the only one who noticed his arms were all over the place lol

To be fair, the audio jack output on the Pi 4 is pretty terrible. A few $ will get you a USB audiocard which is a vast improvement on the audiojack. Or even better of course an audio DAC HAT.

@@wingandaprayer883 Ok, thanks for the info & tip

It is not double the power consumption.. it's like a 50-70% increase. In efficiency terms it's actually an improvement from the 4.

would have

@@azoriusmage thanks

@@wingandaprayer883 50% is double is it not , there is already a faster alternatives to pi 3 before the 4 came out and only reason it didn’t catch on was software issues

@@YiZed-wo4cu A 100% increase would be double. Most so called 'faster alternatives' are at a much higher price point, have little information, community and support and are in a bigger package size. Pi's are not trying to be the absolutely fastest thing out there, they are conforming to a design philosophy. If it doesn't suit your use case then that is of course fine. There are many different use cases.

its wierd they removed hardware accelerated video on the PI5, instead putting burden on the CPU.

I think "it's a Upgrade", which they can MANUFACTURE on same assembly line equipment, Faster CPU, No GPU change, but improved I/O so CPU doing the work is not so noticed, kept prices down for THEM, while the New Parts in Design give the Pi a Small Speed Increase .. Sadly R-Pi 5 has nothing I Need, which as a Long time Raspberry Pi User, Bothers me .. @@AndrewTSq ,

Why would you need 32gb?

@@reheyesd8666 Because I do a lot with my existing ARM boards. Often it starts swaping to hard drive (swapping to SD card will kill the card in under an hour.. then chuck it away). I've regularly seen apps like browsers eat north of 5-6 gb after some light browsing. Also it'd be great for people home-lab'ing k8's etc and running more than trivial servers. I dearly wish there was boards with 0gb ram shipped and they have one or more SO-DIMM slots. So .. here's your board, go find your own ram. There's a fairly large segment of people I run into on IRC and other places running these things for more than hobbyist systems at home. Some boards such as the Khardas gear is 32gb and 64gb soon. Can't wait.. but dearly wish the RPi gear with the very standard and popular hardware all being the same, will have better software support.

All of these tests were run with Pi 4 running 64-bit Bookworm. When running the pi 4 on 32-bit, synthetic benchmarks like sysbench score in the low 200s. 😬

Who needs desolder braid ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

@@Core-Electronics nice, neither a hot air station nor a soldering iron "PIN THIS COMMENT NOW'

Too many RedBulls too early in the morning...