cool. you should ask him what kind of power requirements would be necessary to power a magnetic field of sufficient strength, like could we achieve the field with current technology? or are the power requirements huge? I have always been curious about cosmic radiation and I know water and other passive shielding are OK for solar radiation however it's the cosmic particles that seem to be the head scratcher.

You have an awesome dad! He is very funny - and doing such great, interesting research! Give him a high five for me.

It's not the power requirements that is difficult its the coil to generate the field.

You're dad gave a wonderful presentation, and seems like quite a smart man with much passion. Be sure to let him know tens of thousands of people have thoroughly enjoyed his information and great humor.

Fanatico Buona Fortuna🍀

Precisely. Astronaught cannot leave low earth orbit.

@Musique Bombarde AND FOUR SECONDS DENTAL xray?

The evidence that we never went to the Moon is overwhelming. Only the fully gaslit still believe in it...

So will everyone else, eventually.

Nobody is allowed to do that. That would cause a huge stock market crash. Joke aside for a second. We truly live in a matrix, so sad.

The focus on Mars and Musk, deflects attention from the Artemis moon mission. They are nowhere close to going to the moon, and last update I looked at they had still not come up with a viable heat resistant re entry system. Remember, everything up to this point has been low earth orbit. I seriously doubt that mission will lift off before 2030.

@@sticky59 Then do you think they should copycat the Apollo missions if they plan to get successful ? ;-))

@@sticky59 "Remember, everything up to this point has been low earth orbit" No, it hasn't. Apollo re-entry speeds were much higher than LEO, and their heat shields worked perfectly well, thank you very much.

@@nicolagianaroli2024 A Matrix of Lies and Liars...

I was thinking Gru from the Despicable me movies

that was 12 days of exposure. Going to Mars is over 2 years of exposure. Do you think maybe there's a bit more concern when receiving 61x the dose?

@@thundercactus Nobody will go to Mars, ever. Space beyond the Van Allen belt is deadly, even a couple of hours through it will kill you. Why do you think they keep the levels of radiation secret? They are planning a hoax like the moon landing was to steal billions of dollars from taxpayers! Don't be fooled, use common sense!

@@thundercactus See were the esp admit we lost the technology to go to the moon lol....Ohh and also the video tapes lol....

@@youcanfoolmeonce the radiation levels are not a secret. Marco Durante has an excellent video on it. And the apollo missions were triangulated to the orbit of the moon by amateur HAM radio enthusiasts. Its impossible to fake live radio transmission origin points, especially in space.

@@edinshealtiel3754 they lost the tapes of apollo 11, they still have the tapes from the other 5 missions. We still have all the blueprints for everything, but we havent built a saturn V in over 50yrs. Its not as easy as just slapping some parts together. The whole rocket needs to be redesigned from scratch even to be made by modern manufacturing technology.

Connor O'shaughnessy Keeping it simple mate i like that.

that will only be good for the solar rays

Please elaborate

@Musique Bombarde Huh? The Van Allen belts are deadly full stop. They had no radiation in the module or in their suits. Not to mention the tiny debris and space rocks made of all types of metal flying around a million miles an hour that would tear through anything that we sent to space back then like a bullet through butter. Makes me think the moon missions were fairy tales.

@Musique Bombarde no one ever landed on the moon Einstein

@@docducttape9270 Makes me think you know nothing about the Moon landings or how radiation works.

@@briansamuel5670 I will help you... We can't go easily 3 mile deep in the Ocean today and stay there more than 1 day.. And 50 years ago could go away from earth more than 150. 000 (thousand miles).. .. stud there more than 7 days. Let me guess.. You rather drive a 50 years old car..... yes.. the style is way better....

i think the radiation 'dies' (half-life?). because if we go by your reasoning, then Earth, and everything in space will be 'radioactive' although to a lesser degree(because at least Earth has some shielding)

Yes. The moon is as radiant as the Elephant's foot. It is constantly bombarded with cosmic particles and the solar wind. We are protected by the magnetoshpere.

@@grimlocks its not 3.6 rem?

@@normanguiscard3458 I believe the exposure could be equivalent to 80 grays per hour. I don't know the unit conversion to REM.

@@grimlocks 80 grays = 8000 REM thats for gamma radiation

The irony is that the Lunar Module had a 0,15 milimiters thick crew cabin made from aluminum. That reynolds wrap allegedly protected the astronauts of radiation, the heat irradiated by the sun, and endured the extreme vacuum in space.

The more mass you add to a spacecraft, the lower your delta V is for the fixed amount of fuel on board.

Sukram Sukram well the main problem is storing energy: you need a lot of energy to produce strong current enough to surround ships with magnetic fields; and the strong current needs strong batteries.. just think about the number of solar Panels one would need. My guess: maybe surrounding the ship with a thick layer of water (between some containing material, glass/metal), 1mt long maybe, would help absorbing ions/protons from the solar winds; This could work in far enough missions like going to Mars, while going closer to the sun would mean too much thickness of water needed.. but your solar panels there work better so yeah; it is probably inefficient but still might work

No energy is needed to maintain a magnetic field, look at permanent magnets. If you want to use an electromagnet you need superconducting coils. A superconductor coil is probably the way forward.

If you got a does of 3000 mSv, your lead-lined coffin would keep you from accessing the internet to make that post.

well if you actually watched the video, you'd know that the radiation level of space is easily survivable and quite safe for a short 2 week mission with minimal shielding. The problem with Mars missions is they are 3 years long at the moment, that's 78x the exposure.

@@thundercactus Nobody went to the moon

Right here on YT are the video's of ISS astronauts answering questions .... and stating one day we will be able to go further than low earth orbit. How do you think the photographic film came back from the lunar surface to produce perfect images, when the camera's had no shielding ??

@@sticky59 the cameras did have shielding, in that they were contained within the Apollo Command Module.

@@1960imp U must work for them mr.agent 🤐 what’s ur Ranking on the piramides

@@kaiyakalaaukahi936 no, I don't, I just do a lot of reading around the subject, which is more than a lot of people do.

@@1960imp Have you ever seen the so called Apollo Module up close and in person? I have. I'm surprised it has not been hidden away by now it is a tin can with tinfoil thick covers on it. Total joke to think that think went to the moon.

😂😂😂😄

@Dana William Well no the Apollo missions had no Shielding so either it was a hoax or you don't need shielding no other explanation. I'm leaning on hoax

@C W no. Kennedy made promises that were impossible to keep at a time where the appearance of technological superiority was the main source of of keeping up America's morale. So it's not that we were more advanced but quite the opposite. We couldn't get there then and we cant get there now ..

Lucky last two Apollo missions just missed fatal dose of radiation from a solar storm!

@@johnehteshami725 so we're told

@@johnehteshami725 do you really believe that?

Derk Zeedijk there is not a Scientific issue when you are making a joke about some scientific facts like "earth has a surrounding magnetic field, nobody really knows why or how, but it works nicely and might work the same way in our missions";

there is no bad joke there. it is a good one

😂😄

kleintjuhD correct me if I'm wrong but space is vacuum....and there is still radiation there..

have yo checked yourself? and, oke, maybe there is, but our eyes can never see it.... and if there is no matter, there can be no light falling on it....

kleintjuhD see what? radiation?

we can only see about 0,035% of the entire spectrum..... i would not call 0,035% of an apple, a apple... but anyways, they cant seem to get a perfect vacuum on earth, they havnt even proven this absolute empty space yet.... i think the radiation, like light, IS like a leak for a vacuum. i think the light introduces new electrons INSIDE the vacuum. i think they can get a much better vacuum, a more empty space, if they shielded the vacuum off from radiation, or killed the lights inside to not introduce new electrons into the vacuum... light might be like a leak. but anyways, a crooks tube has bee misinterpreted. the crooks tube proves that if there is no matter, there is no light.... as light can only be seen, the moment of impact, with a solid enough surface, for light.... the crooks tube was said to have a dark spot spread inside the tube, i say if you pump out all matter, light can not fall on it anymore. i dont think a absolute vacuum can support any visible light, for longer distances through it, hence i dont believe there is any visible light in space, unless there is an object, like a atmosphere (blue glow) or planet, and you are close to it. the reason space is dark, IS because there is no matter there.... we observe the ABSENCE of matter, hence darkness.. thus the projection moves invisible through space, the nhits our atmosphere, where it is first seen by us on the surface, on the refractive edge. i think the sun, moon and stars are all seen and observed close to earth for the first time and not in between events in space.

kleintjuhD space is made up of 70% of dark matter, we just haven't discovered the properties of dark matter yet. And plus light doesn't need particles to travel. Light consists of photons which are given energy to travel...

yes, he started a lot of interesting topics, but didn't finish any of them, just jumping to next all the time

Some people need to be smarter to understand his way of saying some corpoo lied about many things. Some people prefer to follow their (nasa) answer rather to study the properties of metal like aluminum, stell and even carbon related to ions particul or x-ray (like he referred ). People prefer to be lied to then to know the truth ( this is very curious because we born and not knowing we easily lie... and our parents insisted that the thuth is more rewarding)

Sorry that he isn't from Arkansas. You are lucky the scientific community stopped speaking German.

Have you tried to speak German..