This looks interesting, but you should have left that early question to "why well being"? When you throw out alternatives like "virtuousness" you are making something of a non-sequitur. If a person is virtuous, then they are one who behaves morally - it is a quality dependent upon whatever is deemed moral. Not a big critique - just a tip. Keep the questions short, concise, and to the point and you can avoid mistakes that with a less friendly interviewee could derail the whole thing.

No all super hero wear cape 💪

Great work Alex!

Earthling Ed is amazing! I’m so glad you’ve been in contact with him.

Hey Cosmic, how do I get a hold of you for having a discussion on veganism? I'm a descriptive subjectivist value pluralist and I've been studying the topic of veganism for the past year. I'd love to just have a discussion about Rawls and notable differences and the way morality could and does operate. Please send me a message!

Thank you, was looking for this comment.

Thanks man :)

Wtf lol was waiting for that and its about after half the video

Humans will not survive unless we start going vegan. 100

Thank you

@@SilenceDogwood. That's one that Christian apologists use to make themselves feel better about Matt's position on religion/theism being more reasonable than theirs. No-one has ever been able to explain to me what a "Dillahunty Dodge" is.

@@SilenceDogwood. That's a complete non-response unless you can actually provide an example. Don't project your convenient position onto me.

@@SilenceDogwood. Anything can be answered in a KZfaq comment section... that's a non-sequitur.

@@SilenceDogwood. Non-sequitur-ception. The question itself is a non-sequitur, and if you unpack that question, it also relies on a non-sequitur. It's sort-of like asking "if Johnny has 5 apples and Jane has 4 apples, how many oranges does Paul have?"

@@SilenceDogwood. As much as the natural laws and desired amount of chucking allowed. Your question is incomplete. I need to know the body weight of this woodchuck, woodchucking abilities, stamina, ambient temperature, position of the sun, and your bank account information. Without all of that, its unknowable

Yes - Matt used a few bad arguments in this discussion. He has a blind-spot on this topic.

WOW I never thought about it that way. Thank you for giving me a new perspective on the suffering of animals.

Yeah, but steak thoooooo.

@@bbqseitan7106 sounds like you should try... bbq seitan... I'll see myself out...

@@pippofranco879 me is soii boii

Exactly. In addition, isn't there enough evidence to warrant their pain thresholds are similar? We're referring to animals with brains, a central nervous systems, we express fear and pain in similar manners & will avoid discomfort & known threats to our well being. That's *more* than enough to extend the benefit of the doubt.

Love to hear this!! Hope you're doing well

@@kin.9133 Doing amazing :) never going back

It convinced me not to do so as Matt has a healthy skin color and Alex looks more like a walking corpse. Something very common among vegans as they lack some needed nutrient.

@@ForOdinAndAsgard lol, that is completely bullshit. Vegans are just as healthy as anybody else. Your "he looks like a walking corpse" is absolute nonsense too, alex loos totally fine here as well as in EVERY OTHER VIDEO where he is STILL vegan

@@ForOdinAndAsgard Its called a tan mate. Fortunately the sun is also vegan friendly ;)

He's from Texas, that's the barbeque capital of the world.

Everyone's journey is different. Cultures are different

Of course, same as all vegans were at some point. Makes one wonder about what biases we still ignore due to convenience.

It's DAMN GOOD!!!!!! Bears, Lions, etc all eat delicious meat, why do I have to be the ONLY animal who can't enjoy their food?

@@jonnaking3054 have you tried answering that question yourself? Why can lions kill their young and eat them but you find the idea morally repulsive?

Domesticated chickens would go extinct without humans.... There has already been research on the topic

@@Thanosdidtherighthing So what? Domesticated chickens are mostly just that - a domesticated version of Red Junglefowl which is still widely found in the wild in Southeast Asia. If we stopped eating them probably the majority of domestic chickens would die off over a few years with a few special breeds remaining if people were interested enough to keep rearing them for other reasons. Same is probably true for other "food animals". A few would remain for sentimental reasons but populations would crash.

Hmmmm yes, dogs would go extinct without humans, so let's just slaughter them and breed them into existence, just to kill them and not give them a life worth living. We are soooooooooooo good.

Does that increase or decrease humanity's responsibility for their wellbeing?

@@Thanosdidtherighthing even if that's true, that doesn't mean we should breed them for food. If we are concerned about their survival (which is ridiculous given how fucked their bodies are), we can easily keep them alive in sanctuaries.

Good on you. Vegans have no problem with meat eaters who have the strength of character to admit it is a moral obligation. There are paths to take and different people have different will power. I'd suggest getting yourselves emersed in 'earthlings' 'land of hope and glory' and 'dominion'. That should take you over the threshold and hopefully you recognise it to be morally abhorrent and never want to go back.

When asked why I'm vegan I recite my five reasons and always make sure to include the nuance of the one that covers the immorality, how it's immoral as long as the person has the option to not eat meat AND they know they have the option. Not having the option may include various rare health reasons or lack of availability of non-animal items economically but for most these two things aren't a problem unless they're only eating the expensive prepared foods and never cooking their food from scratch. I live in Vancouver, Washington which seems like a typical west coast American city and the vegan diet is cheaper. I splurge on the Beyond Meat stuff to satisfy a craving now and then but it's not necessary. There's a gray area of whether the person doesn't know better because maybe they have been too lazy to find out the truths of their preconceived notions (economics, nutrition, difficulty), and because having a internet available to so many these days it's a stretch for many to make an excuse to not uncover the truth that vegan may in fact be an option for them. It's a touchy subject if they claim a rare medical reason why they can't because they may want to really bad and feel horrible that they can't. It comes down to their due diligence. What if they were just doing the diet wrong and think they have a medical out? Hard to say unless you're that person.

You'll see, it's actually really cool to discover all these new recipes 👌

David H Watch the debate between Alex vs Mohammad Hijab at Oxford: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/Z9RdrbyDv9-ZfoU.html

@@Ciaranhbennett David H Watch the debate between Alex vs Mohammad Hijab at Oxford: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/Z9RdrbyDv9-ZfoU.html

Do more then think about it. Do more research in terms of ethics, health and environment. I love meat, believe me I still love the taste (this didn't change after going vegan) but I found it illogical to care about animals and eat them at the same time. I searched for reasons to keep my kebabs and ribs but I haven't found them so I had to go vegan. Good luck on your search friend.

Alex doesn’t have a good argument against non factory farmed meat. He incessantly tried to frame a dichotomy between factory farming and veganism. This was clearly an issue that Matt wasn’t prepared to debate on because Alex’s arguments have gaping holes in them.

@@TyrannicalReigner Actually it's impossible to raise the majority of animals in non-factory farm settings and feed all the people who want to munch on their flesh, because we simply do not have enough land nor resources to raise these animals with anything approaching humane methods. Also if your pet dog was raised with love and plenty of good food and exercise, is it then right to round up these dogs in a death truck where they will be hung up upside down and have their throat slit by the thousands? "Non factory farmed meat" DOES NOT MEANT HORRENDOUS CRUELTY FREE - and even in so -called non factory farms animals are not given adequate medical care bc their worth is only as much as the weight of their flesh and any vet bills will eat into the "profit". And if you think about it WHY IS AN ANIMAL'S LIFE WORTH LESS THAN YOUR TASTE HABIT? If there is NO NEED for you to round them up and butcher them mercilessly, why would you insist on doing it ?

Allusive Ashly why are you just making that up? There is no data to support the idea we can’t feed everyone non factory farmed meat. However, there is data to support the fact we can feed everyone non factory farmed meat

Interesant raising animals in the same way they live in the wild is absolutely good for the environment. Why do you mercilessly allow animals to be killed for your plant food?

Exactly! He was on the other side, literally heard him using comments and jokes his callers would use. Fun stuff!

@@alonsohdzf I thought it was a really good debate, very informative.... Now I'm off to have me a thick juicy ribeye steak with a side of chicken livers.... I love my eat out days

@@rdm3373 I wasn't when I watched this. I am now.

Hopefully this open the door for you to realize he has more than one area of weak argument. He is absolutely terrible on metaphysics. See David Bentley Hart for more.

@@jonnaking3054 there’s always someone who likes to throw these comments in, happy to troll with nothing interesting to say. Well done

Joel, Which one are you referring to?

Never mind. I read your comment incorrectly. I assume you’re referring to Matt and I agree.

Yep :)

Oh, care to elaborate on these bad arguments he made? You asserted he made bad arguments and kind of trailed off on explaining how they were...

Yes, the same aspect of the human brain that can both condemn slavery but then fights to justify its presence in their bible is how he approaches some of the veganism topics that come up.

@Afifa M So you have nothing to prove that he's giving misinformation, you're just asserting that he does?

You weren't born a Muslim. It isn't a genetic trait.

I'm guessing you're not a Muslim anymore?

You are not born as a Muslim. You were raised as a Muslim.

Similar experiences here. Welcome into the world of freethought and reason. Best wishes on your journey to knowledge 😀

Obviously he didn’t have bad arguments considering Alex is no longer vegan.

@@trillion1124 that doesnt have anything to do with Matts arguments. I can as a meat eater argue for veganism and if you are using bad arguments then thats just how it is. I may also be a hypocrite for arguing against something I indulge in, but that does not make the arguments themselves any different.

@@m.a.a.d9275 Yep, the classic Tu Quoque fallacy. I also could argue for veganism inspite of my absolute indulgence in eating the flesh. Does this put us in a star of cognitive dissonance?

​@@harryclark7404i mean, yeah, probably? knowing that what i was doing was morally unjustifiable certainly had me experiencing dissonance.

@@scslre We all do morally unjustifiable things when it is convenient for us to do so. I've never seen a vegan give up their phone for example. Yet they say a phone is like a sausage - you don't want to know what's in it. Or something along those lines ... this doesn't disprove a vegan's argument nor does it make them a hypocrite, at least I don't think it does, but you have to admit that it is interesting where we draw those lines. The way vegans feel about their phone is how the majority of meat eaters feel about their food. We simply don't care where it comes from because it's convenient. Is it right? Probably not. But it's not like we live in this constant state of CD because most of us choose to ignore it and then we fall out of the trap. If you look at a chart of CD with smoking cigarettes as the example it's quiet easy to do it. You can either change your behaviour (stop smoking) or you can choose not to believe the evidence. Either way, you won't experience CD anymore over that topic if you do one or the other. Is willful ignorance really the solution I'm advocating for? Yes, it is - I take th3 same approach that you likely take when it comes to using your mobile phone or computer.

David Brown that’s amazing; I’m thinking of doing the same.

🙌

Bulshit.

that's amazing!

@@caleb3909 It worked for me. You can never tell how people will react and you have further complexities such as long term effect contra short term, seed planting, anger turning into curiosity. I usually call BS on people claiming to know that he makes no or negative difference (not that you did that now).

Woah... A Southern African name.

Langa more like... Lumbago

veganism is false

Oh Matt was judgemental, he blocked Alex On Twitter a few months after this.

@vegass04 I guess we should be thankful he saved his tantrum for twitter months after this conversation. I suppose he got fed up with his views being challenged.

I had watched this right after going vegan and I remember it was a little cringy by Matt. Now after reaching it's even more so. 😬

I rewatched this numeral times and each time I watch it, it just gives me another reason to not go vegan

@@trillion1124 interesting take. I can't think of any reasons not to besides rare cases which almost nobody is in or specific areas which again isn't anyone watching this. The sole reason I've found that most don't is they don't want to, which bluntly isn't a reason.

@@jlayman89it’s a good reason because meat is delicious. And plus vegans are annoying fuckheads and I don’t want to be associated with them.

I have been an aspiring vegan for many years. I just finished lunch that included feta cheese. I forgot to ask to have it left off. I ate it without regret. My daughter was vegan for years, but when diagnosed with Crohn’s disease, she had dropped to 90 lbs (age 27). She fought for 2 years, and finally switched to some meat, and has enjoyed good health. I bike to work & my car is electric. I don’t expect anyone to do the same. My goal for today is for my next meal to be vegan. If I fail, no guilt.

Says the guy with a hamster profile photo :)))))) (yes u highly agree, btw, i just found it funny)

@@grains425 Not a Hamster, it's a guinea pig

Wujeeta, guinea pigs are not an “it.”

@@AV57 Everything that exists is an "it" by virtue of being an object. I'm not trying to demean the poor things, especially being they're my favorite animal, they get enough crap when they're thrown in frying pans.

Wujeeta, I think that one of the best ways to promote animal rights is to cease referring to them as “it” or “things.” I understand you don’t mean any harm by using those labels, but it does feed into the slave mentality that many animals suffer under.

Vegan atheist club representtt

You're the last person I'd eat if stuck on a deserted island. ; )

There are many of us

@@theveganwujeeta DOZENS!

checking in

Apparently never will as he is blocking people on Twitter so he does not have to address it.

Rage CL i think (almost) everyone in their heart is an ethical vegan. We don’t like to see animals suffer , especially the animals that we adore like pets.Unfortunately, most people don’t act on it.

lol I don't think there are any arguments for it that don't rely on bullshit nondiscriminatory use of empathy.

Agreed mostly. Although I will admit that eating meat is wrong. At the end of the day I just do not care. I don't mind being labeled a moral I don't mind being wrong but I enjoy eating meat and I will never stop. If someone can be vegan, that's great for them but that will never be me. I said before I can eat six meals a day with 50 grams of fat 150 carbs very low sodium almost no sugar 250 grams of protein for $100 a month. I almost primarily eat lean chicken and other lean meat. I almost never eat red meat and my cholesterol and blood pressure are amazing. If I found out tomorrow that eating meat was going to shave 10 years off of my life I would continue to do it. I can acknowledge that it's wrong but it makes me happy and I love it and I will never stop.

@@thickerconstrictor9037 It's just silly. Is hitting a rock wrong? Is hitting a computer wrong? Is hitting a biological computer wrong? you'd do well to incorporate red meat and what not. Dietary cholesterol is not bad for you and higher levels of cholesterol is a marker for better health in old people actually. It's another one of those misunderstood blood markers that can not be looked at by itself. Just don't eat shitty plants and sugar when eating the meat.

@Gee Shaug Do you think your fleeting taste pleasure is worth more than the life of an animal?

Imagine of you switch veganism in his arguments with slavery. A bunch of abolitionists called in and made me hate the ideology.

Ouch. Just got to the part where Matt calls the government banning meat a "massive disruption" and Alex responds "just like the 13th amendment"... crickets...

Matt Bradley I think Matt is just uninformed. I think if he actually was interested in the issue he would come around. Many of his argument I think he would refute himself if he did more research. Alex is savage. I personally don’t like slavery comparisons, but the 13th amendment line was just so well placed 😆.

Near the end Matt says "the pleasure aspect often gets shoved off like that shouldn't be an issue" and becomes a level 1 carnist meme.

@@mymathmind I agree. I actually think Matt was close at the end, but changing one's mind in real time, in public, might just be impossible.

Indeed in this same video I saw MD Using the same arguments as theist.

Ok..why are plants better sources of slaughter?

@@philliph8991 Wtf? Didnt you saw the video?

@@philliph8991 what ?...what's did you just say ?

@@philliph8991 Irrelevant

👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻

Yes, true !

is it Cognitive Dissonance to lament the exploitation of living beings...while using an iPhone? Because it seems vegans tend to focus on the suffering of animals before the suffering of human beings.

@@sTEALtooth said by someone using a computer or a phone lmao

@@sTEALtooth might as well just not do anything at all, right? Because doing nothing is way better than doing something. Can’t save everyone on the Titanic, so might as well leave everyone to drown. But seriously, we can’t stop every instance of suffering our actions cause. It’s almost impossible. But that doesn’t mean we shouldn’t do as much as we can to reduce it. Going vegan is one of the biggest and easiest things you can do. You’re still using a phone/computer to type that comment, so how can you criticize vegans for doing the same? They’re, to use the above metaphor, at least /trying/ to save break out those lifeboats lol

He's not.

​@@jocastushe is

Is that true?

Yh, just saw the video today.

he eats animal products for health reasons now due to severe illness - in other words, out of necessity. and he might still be vegetarian. His points on the matter are still valid: it's not unethical to eat animal products if it's the only way to be healthy. Other reasons are not good enough. He also likely sources those products extremely carefully.

@@nicknameaccount6193 🤣🤣🤣

Yeah seriously that's when I realized he really didn't put much thought into this subject

That's not even how it works, unless everyone went vegan overnight. We breed them, that's why there are so many, because the demand to consume is so high.

@@Olivetree80 Right... Like there'd be a severe overpopulation of domesticated cattle if we didn't have billions jammed into cement factories in spaces so small they can NEVER turn around in their entire lifetime..

@@Olivetree80 Nevertheless if we DO stop consuming meat, even progressively, we have to accept that all these animals and their offspring will have to die

@@Olivetree80 Because unless you can pay farmers to keep taking care of those livestock even in ethical ways there is nothing to do with them. And no question of freeing them in the wild either

You don't need to hear an argument in favour of meat eating. You just need to look at your morphology, your physiology and your biochemistry to see who you are, what you are, and how you should be living and eating in order to maintain a the balance between you and the life all around you that supports you.. You just need to look at the people who live most naturally and symbiotically in this world, the indigenous hunter gatherers of the world which is how we all lived 10,000 years ago. We would not have been able to colonise the Northern latitudes of the planet unless we were naturally able to eat and digest meat. You just need to note that there are no vegan cultures and societies anywhere in the world, and never have been. That should tell you something about the diet. If it is so good for us you would expect vegan eating to have evolved with us and be widespread throughout the world. You just need to look at the number of vegans who are unable to maintain their health long term. You just need to look at the fact that the diet is unsustainable without access to out of season,and non local foods some from half way round the world. In addition, some of these foods require artificial fortification and the diet also requires additional supplements. Most of the world don't have access to this variety of food, it is only the privileged few living a Western lifestyle with the luxury of choice.

Thats awesome bro, Goodluck switching to Veganism.

There are lots of really delicious vegan cheeses (esp miyoko makes great cheese) Enjoy :) !!

mchooksis mchooksis It’s not because humans have been eating meat for centuries and that’s what presumably made the colonization of the north possible that we should continue to eat it. We don’t live like we used to live back then, people would eat whatever they could hunt and find and didn’t have many options. For a long time veganism wasn’t sustainable because we didn’t have access to supplements and so health problems related to a diet without meat couldn’t be avoided. Nowadays we do have this access so it’s not necessary to eat meat. It’s true that some people can’t afford supplements but those who can have the option to be vegan, they aren’t simply because they don’t want to.

GavinJ06 that guy mchooksis is a perfect example of how there are no good arguments for eating meat. And in fact, when you hear things like that, it reminds you going vegan is the right move.

Shut him the hell up looool it was glorious, shame Alex has chosen to no longer align his actions with his morals but that was a mic drop moment for the ages.

Honestly i think he didn’t even rem what the 13th amendment was at that moment. Think hes was so rattle by Alex

​@@Dr.Drakken_I don't think that's what it was at all. I didn't even know what the 13th amendment was, but I knew exactly what it was the moment he said it. This was one of the best moments I've ever seen, as well. I actually said "oh shit" out loud when he said it lol

​@@Dr.Drakken_matt is known for his stuff on biblical slavery more than anything, there's no way he forgot

I will go with this channel till I find a better one :)

This is what good arguments are supposed to sound like.

"if you don't like factory farms, why do you eat their meat?" "Who says I do?" "Idk, do you?" "Yes." I'm paraphrasing, but it absolutely was that ridiculous.

There is no moral dilemma.It is the moral choice to eat meat as it causes less animal suffering. A person can sustain him self with an animal a year. A Vegan kills hundreds of animals every year to sustain himself through the use of pesticides and fertilizers. Millions of living things if you include the insects.

@Maquiavel Arturiano hay doesn't need pesticides, it is fruits weed and vegetables destined for human consumption that need them, and mainly for aesthetic reasons

Matt Dillacunty is a moron.

Hey are you the guy that got Unnatural Vegan pregnant? I'm sorry , I dont why but I've always that that it was you. She keeps her private life a secret. I'm sure you wouldn't tell even if it was you but I thought I'd ask anyway.😁

@@melissasahagun5359 since I've never met Unnatural Vegan in real life, that would be quite the achievement. I've only done a couple of colabs with her. I don't know her outside of an email exchange.

TheVeganAtheist Hey look you’re alive!

TheVeganAtheist when are you coming back with content?

🙌

That's why I don't try to defend eating meat. I will say absolutely unequivocally I am selfish. I care more about humans than I do about other animals and I understand the climate change argument as well. I've made many changes to help with my carbon footprint and I also realize I could do more by next t eating meat. It's why I made so many changes because I'm just not willing to give up me. I'm not willing to give up something that makes me happy. I'm sorry I'm not sorry. I enjoy eating meat and will continue to do so. I will flat out say in this regard I'm immoral. But there is absolutely nothing that will make me stop eating meat. You can tell me I'm going to die 10 years early and I'm still going to eat meat. Because I would rather enjoy my time. There are vegan dishes that are good but I can eat six to seven meals a day on $100 a month and get over 250 g of protein with under 60 g of fat and about 150 carbs and that's just not something that is both going to be matched in money, nutritional information, and enjoyability. So yep I'm selfish. And I will continue to be selfish. I respect the fuck out of people who can be vegan and I think that while many vegans are insufferable and do not help your cause, you guys have the moral high ground. But that's not a high ground that I have any interest in joining and never will

I agree with the ethical considerations of vegans, but not the health argument. I remain a meat eater, for the reason that I believe humans are evolved to eat meat and a diet of meat *and* vegetables provides by far the best complement of nutrients. That said, I have recently become more conscious about where my meat or fish is coming from and how much I'm eating (I go vegetarian at least a couple of days a week). I think people need to accept there's an issue with meat (animal welfare, environmental sustainability etc), but the question is what we do about it. Is it symptomatic of bigger problems, e.g. over population and wealth inequality? As a vegan would you have a problem with hunter gatherer societies killing animals to eat? Is there a way we can still have meat, in a more sustainable and ethical way, or does it have to be the all or nothing approach veganism proposes?

@@cmpc7241) "plants" is too specific, as there are nutrients that are only produced by bacteria, or easiest to get from fungi, etc

Imagine considering selfishness to be a supposedly inherently negative strait. What a dipshit.

Alexa D - Don’t you just love how that all works out? 😃 I’m still hoping to see the day Matt goes vegan. I’ve been envisioning it for years, especially being that he’s such a brilliant thinker, and he can help inspire soooo many people in the atheist/ skeptics community 😍

@@TheAndyVegan How dull is your life that you actually look forward to someone you probably don't know deciding to be vegan? 🤣

@Zachary Stewart Atheism can't be, because it's the lack of an ideology, not an ideoogy it itself. Veganism is rational.

@Zachary Stewart Bro, you just watched a 2 hour video on a rational debate on veganism

@Zachary Stewart are you saying you are for animal cruelty and that for your taste habits you will continue to pay to torture innocent animals until they die terrified and enduring unwatchable violence because cruelty is good and "unemotional"? Seems like snacking your lips eating animal flesh is nothing but emotion driven to me.

We are everywhere pal

Yes we are

Another one here 🤷🏼‍♀️

Represent! I'm so happy Cosmic Skeptic decided to go vegan.

Hell yeah bro

In his defense, he admits this is the longest conversation he's ever had on the topic. I think this is about as well as it could have gone for someone's first time hearing all this. Maybe I'm biased, but I see my own cognitive dissonance and naive bias not to change my eating habits in his responses. It took me a long time of reflection to realize my hypocrisy and I hope that Matt will eventually reach the conclusion that seems so apparent to us here on the other side of it

HunkyMcStudleypants That is so awesome!!!!! There are a lot of good dairy alternatives( and a few egg alternatives )that do not involve the suffering of animals. And remember: it takes some time for your tastebuds to get used to other products instead of cows milk and eggs

this is amazing!🙌❤ have you heard of the Happy Cow App? you can download it to find good vegan eats like cheesy pizza and ice cream, in your area! with reviews too. it can be so helpful for you😃❤🌎🐾

@@mayganphynix8267 yep! I've been using it a ton. According to HC I live in the #4 vegan-friendly city in the world. I travel the country for work and have found some fantastic meals using that app.

when I was 17 I went vegan and my little sister went vegan at 14

@gypsy 1999 That's awesome guys! I know how hard it is that young firsthand!

He practically said he watched all of that And still it wasn't clear to him I don't know what one can say to that

@@Phoenix-King-ozai I do. People will go to all sorts of lengths to justify their beliefs, no matter how unjustifiable they are. This is clearly the case with Matt and eating meat.

@@Solidude4 I agree But since its a subjective thing We can't prove that he is full of shit Which is what he is banking on Alex cut his bs so many times in the video He should just have admitted he was biased It would have been a lot more honest

@@Phoenix-King-ozai Exactly. Even before Alex went vegan he was honest and admitted he can't morally justify it and I respect that a lot. Like, keep eating meat if you really want to but don't come up with BS reasoning for why you think it's moral to do it.

@@Solidude4 Ikr The hypocrisy pisses me off I am just a Vegetarian now I need to have milk because of the circumstances But i know that cows are horribly treated I accept that Vegans are doing a better job of reducing suffering than me Matt flat out stated that he doesn't think its immoral to kill animals Because of lack of some social contract or some garbage I bet he would have been a slave owner if he lived in that time His excuses are just that shitty

I hope the people who thought Matt lost the arguments are crying themselves to sleep every night.

@@trillion1124 Evil... I like it xD

What happened? Can I get a quick recap?

@@brennanbarber7469 Alex O’Connor is no longer a vegan

@@trillion1124 Whattt really?? Has he ever talked about it haha that’s insane

Well he already had a position on this, he should be able to defend it properly.

@Great White Aren't you pushing your belief on other people that others shouldn't push their beliefs on other people?

@Great White just wondered what your rational ethical/moral argument against veganism is?

@Great White and I didn't say you were. I asked what your rational ethical/moral argument against veganism is? I assume you have one.

@Great White I get the feeling that you don't have a clue as to what veganism is with this comment. Veganism is a moral belief that un-necessarily exploiting animals for food, clothing or other purpose is wrong. With any moral belief, the people who hold such a belief are going to want to try and convince others of it. When black people were used as slaves, imagine if nobody had done anything - and those against slavery didn't ever speak up - martin luther king never gave that speech - black people now would still be living in slavery. Likewise with women's rights - if the suffragettes hadn't done what they did, women would still have no right to vote. Those people in their time were hated by many others - they were locked up, assassinated and generally got on people's nerves. Just like Vegans probably are getting on your nerve's. But it's precisely because it's a moral belief. If it wasn't, they wouldn't give a flying fuck what you decided to eat.

busted =P

I wish some ppl would just come out and say that, especially matt

RobotikEmpire Pretty much

@Zachary Stewart An animal dying purely for your tastebuds. There's nothing wrong with that? I hope you're not against dog fighting. Because that would not be logically consistent.

@Zachary Stewart Do you also pray to colourful crystals and call upon the power of the universe? "It all comes back to the self". I mean, dogs would be great produces of meat. We've just got to Genetically alter them like we have chickens and cows. Pump them full of steroids, select the perfect breeds etc. How long does it take a dog to be fully grown? I mean, they might be great for it. I get it, you're conditioned a certain way, and you're a complete simpleton. Me asking you to step outside of this is near impossible isn't it....... Wait....you go out of your way to kill ants? That's a bit weird mate.

I think its an attempt to reconcile morality with legal norms. By saying the problem with hurting a dog is upsetting the owners (same argument is made with killing a mentally disabled child), you keep the legal norm that its not animal suffering that is illegal, but messing with humans property. If you grant that dogs have an independent moral worth, then it would have to be wrong to hurt them even if they didn't have an owner, but that would also make it illegal to kill other animals that were of similar level of sentience to dogs (so pigs, cows, sheep). It's mainly a problem of people not being able to live with the dissonance of "yes it is wrong but I don't care enough to sacrifice taste and convenience". If you see how meat eaters react to abuse of pet animals its very clear they instinctively recognize the moral worth of other animals they're just trying to build a moral framework that somehow allows for the meat industry at the same time.

aldi throw well said!

Christian Psychonaut777 what do you mean?

Objectively morally neutral? Yes. But objective morality doesn't exist.

godless heathen I’m not quite clear, are you saying it is morally neutral because objective morality doesn’t exist?

Anthony Clark I agree. It is clear that Matt is being intellectually honest with regard to the reason for the conversation. I admire both of these gentlemen and appreciate the mutual respect shown through this dialogue. This is the reason I support debate. They learn from each other

As a vegan too I encounter a lot of meat eaters who do not stay this calm in a debate and I very much respect that. However I think with some of his arguments I would have the need to hold myself back to not react in a annoyed way

*Anthony Clark* Perhaps you'll know this ; what is Alex's position on grasshoppers. Obviously he won't consume any animal products but what's the ethical position? Is it immoral to kill a grasshopper?

@@BigHeretic Do you know for sure that a grasshopper has a subjective experience? Unless you're fairly certain they don't have a subjective experience, then one should grant the benefit of the doubt to the grasshopper, presume a subjective experience, and extend moral consideration to the grasshopper. This presumes you value sentience in moral decision making. If you kill the grasshopper and it turns out they are sentient, imo, you have committed a moral wrong. If you don't kill the grasshopper and it turns out they are NOT sentient, imo, you have committed no moral wrong because NOT KILLING a non-sentient organism is morally neutral. All that will have been lost is you will have denied yourself the pleasure of killing a grasshopper (if you're into that sort of thing.) Given this, one should err on the side of caution and not kill the grasshopper (presuming this isn't a killer grasshopper and poses no existential threat to you) I'd recommend Albert Schweitzer's writing on the topic where he discusses the moral virtue of helping a worm back to the grass from the sidewalk after it had been washed out from the rain. www.animal-rights-library.com/texts-c/schweitzer01.htm

@@ethologos2580 So...? If you can't be sure that plants have subjective experience are you going to stop eating plants? If not, what is the ethical argument for not killing a grasshopper?

Yes!

2nd this

Make it happen!

Is Earthling Ed an atheist? It would be interesting if Alex discussed with Ed for atheism, like this talk he has with Matt about veganism.

niva2gr I’m not sure if Ed is an atheist or not! But that would be interesting to see :)

He does make great points but at the same time is 125 lb. I know there are vegan bodybuilders but at the end of the day I eat 6 meals a day with 50 grams of fat 150 g of carbs very low sugar very low sodium and 250 g or more of protein and I spend $100 a month. It is very difficult to match all of that with $100 a month and the same nutritional number. Not to mention I'm a very picky eater had although I have found vegan dishes that I enjoy, the cost and the nutritional value does not match up. But even all all that aside, I love eating meat. I don't care if I'm immoral I don't care if people don't like it I don't care if it's wrong I don't care if they made it legal I don't care if I am going to lose 10 years of my life I enjoy eating meat and it makes me happy and I will never change. Now if they now if they can create fake meat at the same cost, same nutritional numbers, same texture, same taste, then I would be willing to switch. And I have tried numerous vegan meats and unfortunately most of them in my opinion are disgusting. I would love to like them but a majority of them I do not like. I'm very picky so people can label me immoral or evil and that's completely fine. I support vegans but I will never be one of them

Not very convincing.

@@thickerconstrictor9037 That's fine, I accept your right to choose to take immoral action, especially when you've been open enough to acknowledge that it is, in fact, immoral.

@@thickerconstrictor9037 the current version of you must cease to exist, replace it with a better version of yourself or you'll never know true enlightenment

@@thickerconstrictor9037 He was underweight before he went vegan. Also a normal, healthy vegan diet is very cheap and easy, as long as you don't overindulge in a lot of vegan "meat" alternatives. Also veganism is a moral choice. I, as a vegan, even if was a bodybuilder, would never put bodybuilding over the life of other sentient beings.

And that is the reality

Go vegan! ❤️

Will, watch the "Best Speech You'll Ever Hear" by Gary Yourofsky. It's on KZfaq. Thank me later. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/i5uYerR1sdbWcWw.html

Peter Hofmann I'm only aware of the issue of B12 vitamin not being available in regular, unenriched vegan food, and that especially vegan women should focus on getting enough iron in their diet. But in my experience eating a vegan diet is both healthier and more enjoyable than eating a conventional diet. It's very easy to get started. I recommend you learn to make a vegan chili, a vegan curry or dhal, and a potato dish, and you're off to a great start.

Peter Hofmann Thank you. I'm happy to hear that. And don't worry too much about being perfect. You will learn as you go. I can promise you that if you focus on getting a lot of colors in your food you will inadvertently have a good mix of micronutrients in there too. "Eat the rainbow" is a good rule of thumb. Maybe check out some of the mock meats and plant minces while you are transitioning. Aldi has very reasonable prices on these products. I recommend oatmilk as a substitute for dairy milk in your coffee if you are a coffe with milk -type person. It is tasty and has a nice color and texture.

@Peter Hofmann If you miss meat at first, young jackfruit is a pretty neat substitute for something like pulled pork, when you cook it. It has a similar texture and is great on a bun like a pulled pork sandwich. Cooking it in some kind of sauce is best. I usually get it in a can, in oriental/Asian sections of some stores (I'm in the US). There are other substitutes like black bean burgers, etc. but I don't know of many since I'm not a vegan myself. Definitely do a lot of research and read labels to ensure you're getting the right nutrients, and consider consulting a nutritionist as well.

He has always been biased against god

@@Jonathan-tw4xm Matt used to be a devout believer on the path to becoming a pastor and then eventually a minister, you don’t know what you’re saying.

​@@moldytomato9130to be fair devoutly religious people that lose their religion tend to live out their fanaticism in some other way. Often in the form of being extremely anti-religion

Wayward Winchester is a vegan? Another reason to love your channel ❤

@ProtoCoaxke 1. Prove it. 2. Why is that relevant to today? 3. Cognitive dissonance is a phenomena where actions do not correlate with beliefs, it is an internal inconsistency in logic, where is this?

@ProtoCoaxke 1. That isn't a citation, thats just another way of saying "do your own research so that I don't have to fulfill my burden of proof" 2. Because what happened in the past for our survival is not needed in today's hypercaloric society, also, past actions do not somehow justify current ones. We .as have had good reason to eat animals in the past, but not anymore, millenia of progress and modern scientific understanding has shown we can survive and in fact thrive on a plant based diet, we no longer need meat to survive. 3. Being an omnivore does not require us to eat meat, it merely means we can survive on either meat or plants, not that we need both. Ignoring scientific data such as this? : The position of the American dietetics association pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19562864/ British dietetics association www.bda.uk.com/resource/british-dietetic-association-confirms-well-planned-vegan-diets-can-support-healthy-living-in-people-of-all-ages.html British national health service www.nhs.uk/live-well/eat-well/vegetarian-and-vegan-diets-q-and-a/ Here are a few other studies just to throw around for fun: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK396513/ academic.oup.com/ajcn/article/89/5/1627S/4596952 This one is a guide for physicians. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3662288/ And here are the results of the largest study ever conducted on the topic: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9860369/ I'll take the actual data over the outdated notion that just because we are omnivores that it somehow negates modern day understanding and up to date knowledge. (Not that you're going to read a lick of what I posted, but if you don't, and continue with the same line of reasoning, then you can look yourself in the mirror and know you're dishonest and lying to yourself, and we're afraid of reading the scientific consensus) 4. Because we give a shit. Animals don't need to die for our pleasure. Also, capitalism works on the basic principle of supply and demand, if the customers want it, somebody will supply it. Capitalists only care about what brings them the most green paper, if meat beings them money, they will sell meat, if people don't want to buy meat, supermarkets aren't going to buy stock that customers aren't buying, and farms aren't going to breed and sell animals that don't get bought. If supermarkets find their plant based options selling out, they're going to stick more of it, and we see that as a trend statistically, more plant based options are being sold, there's more variety of options, meat sales are declining, dairy sales are declining, there is progress and it starts with the consumer. Vote with your wallet if you want things to change. 5. Plants do not let out a scream at all, this is pseudoscience. Until somebody can prove that plants actually have a nervous system, a brain to interpret electrical impulses as pain, and until there is a scientific consensus on the matter, I'll still eat plants. This is also a red herring fallacy, and also a perfectionist fallacy, it also neglects to understand that animals require plants to eat, and the process of converting plant calories into animal calories is very inefficient, so by being vegan, more plants are saved if you supposedly care about plants. The plants feel pain argument has been debunked a million times, and do you really think vegans havent heard that one before?

Intelligent X'D Eat meat = animals die, die = bad, therefor eat meat = bad. Bad. Except that there's nothing objectively bad, therefor we can choose what's bad. Try again. "Cognitive dissonance" isn't objectively bad, therefor it's only subjectively bad, bad in your/his opinion. We can choose what's bad, therefor cognitive dissonance isn't bad, bad in my/our opinion. Try again.

@@Bambim8 I agree completely. There is no such thing as objective right and wrong. Let's put this to the test. Do you value logic and reason?

I disagree. It seems like 95% of these comments agree with Alex.

@@JasonWilliams89 That's the simply the echo chamber of ppl drawn to this video. Which, of course, is not representative of the cohort I was referencing in my original comment. Feel free to peruse other Atheist forums and do a study! I bet it won't be 95% for veganism. I sincerely wish it was. Regards, A (fellow?) vegan

@Richard P Dickie's trying to relive his trolling glory days of 2006. The flat earth videos are over there.

Well simply calling something irrational does not make it so dear vegan friend ;) we meat eaters got reasons!

@Richard P I had a feeling you were just a dumbass from some other comment thread where you actually try to justify eating animals, but now it's clear you are, in fact, a dumbass. Keep going against your own self-interest, we're all rooting for you!

Watching Alex do the same thing now is even more satisfying.

Matt really struggled

That’s just called being an atheist.

​ How so?

Alex is now eating meat! Dillahunty prevails again!!

​@Freddy McIntire I agree. I am just stating the fact that he was cornered etc, and dodged questions. I respect the debate, but matt knows what he was doing. He debates for a living. I very much doubt he was being logically honest, when he was switching the topic, etc. Im glad he did the debate, but he still loses respect from me in that aspect. If he had of just conceded, and admitted it when cornered, I would be a little more happy.

@Freddy McIntire Yes, you're absolutely right. I wish people wouldn't view responses like Matt's as negative, it only defeats the purpose of having these types of discussions. Plus Matt seemed to say he would look into it more, so may end up being invested enough in the issues to change his mind, which is a very healthy thing for a rational skeptic.

@@corpsecandy2076 He conceded that his main issue might be the fact that he is kind of ignorant about animal rights. He also said that he is in a state of cognitive dissonance. He and his position is to an extent respectable.

@J w I don't understand why your argument seems to be exclusively against Matt? You're right that he's a hypocrite, but if you watched CosmicSkeptic's video on veganism, you know he's a hypocrite as well. CosmicSkeptic's position is that it's immoral to eat meat, yet he still eats it precisely because it tastes good. It's possible he may be even a bigger hypocrite than Matt (which is not to say he's a bad thinker) because while Matt doesn't accept that eating meat is bad, CosmicSkeptic does accept that but still eats meat.

David Lapinski he’s gone vegan. Did you watch this?

Vegans can't make any headway with christian right-wingers, so they are trying their luck with rational Leftists. They'll fail just as they have always failed.

rstevewarmorycom And why is that?

@@garax1548 Nawh, that's one of those bullshit vegan lies, it's like christian converts to islam, the muslims won't tell you that they fall away and reject islam at the same rate.

Im thriving rn

@@rstevewarmorycom if you had any awareness of the world around you, you'd know that's so fuckin wrong. From a non-vegan, I can objectively say that the vegan world has expanded GREATLY in the past few years, not only evident in the open debates online, but also in the food industry itself

Same exact thing happened to me, except it was Dominion after discovering and binging Earthling Ed's video's, went Vegan a few months ago.

@@FaultyProgeny Same hahah.

Same happened to me, im going vegan starting next week, im flexitarian now

@Ruby Badilla that's all great and stuff but did you call humans herbivorous?

@Ruby Badilla I'm taking that as sarcasm

Charles B People aren’t animals. Animals don’t have rights. I can’t believe this is a hard argument to understand. My dog doesn’t have rights, neither do any other animals, if you want to accept that or not, it’s the truth.

@@zarakrishan8572 Can you give any moral argument to support that claim? Or is that a position you simply hold on faith?

He is weak in the first two thirths. Then he actually gives Alex a run for his money. Please note that he is fighting the uphill battle since most of his audience is predisposed to agree with Alex's side of the debate. And Alex is a great debater.

@@zarakrishan8572 Well actually some countries have animals rights the same rights as some humans do, and we don't have innate natural rights, we only have rights because we deem it so for society. People are animals.

If you ever needed proof that Dillahunty's 20 years as an Atheist Call-in show host stems from inner resentment and (probably) repressed trauma, and not some kind of desire to be altruistic to the human species by spreading atheism- this is it. He clearly hasn't spent much time thinking about any ethical issue outside of Atheism and isn't even able to form good arguments in real time. This is pathetic.

Nothing about it not providing proper nutrition?

Don’t forget the most important one: community. Vegan community is the worst community to ever exist.

@@krumplethemal8831 well if you just take 15 min to research you would know that nutrition is of no concern

@@krumplethemal8831 You realize one can eat meat and ALSO eat all the things a vegan eats right? A good meal has everything, to say not being vegan means you are not getting proper nutrition is incredibly stupid.

1. Not caring 2. Sadistic sense of dominance 3. Convenience 4. L + Not Human + Tasty

Why is that, because of his vegan activism?

@@paulpaul8221 no, because he blocks anyone that disagrees with him.. he’s a complete child

If you ever needed proof that Dillahunty's 20 years as an Atheist Call-in show host stems from inner resentment and (probably) repressed trauma, and not some kind of desire to be altruistic to the human species by spreading atheism- this is it. He clearly hasn't spent much time thinking about any ethical issue outside of Atheism and isn't even able to form good arguments in real time. This is pathetic.

@@BigHelianthus I don't agree he is struggling in vegan debate, other than that he kicks ass, and he is good thinker who even gave Jordan Peterson very hard time

@@BigHelianthus Exactly.

@@siddharthatwal6633 Well, he fails to convincingly respond to the propositions presented to him and often deflects. I'd say for an intellectual in an intellectual debate that would connotate struggling. I've only found one somewhat convincing argument against veganism and I challenge you to guess it...

@@cornsockgabz A somewhat convincing argument against veganism? I've got no idea what it could be, do you mind sharing?

You took my words 💜

Don't miss the debate between Mohammad Hijab and Alex at Oxford University on Monday 6th.

Damn. Spot on!

Summary: Alex is a pompous looser with pathetic dilemmas, and Matt is just not drinking the new age cool-aid.

@@TheTantanski which of his dillemas is pathetic? Any specific u got in mind?

@Richard P that's a fair point I think...

@Richard P not vegans.

With the pinnacle being the mic drop moment of "the 13th amendment."

You haven't seen many Matt Dillahunty videos then. He is often caught out.

First time? Matt uses straws every time he debates a Christian

@@yena6689 Not at all

@@yena6689 Sure

You seem like you have a low iq

When?

Lil Jaluicy Did you watch it dumbtard?? or had difficulty understanding it?

@@humanityisislam kappa?

@@Phoenix-pb4sm I had this impression multiple times while watching this video. One I remember was the analogy to the truck. It would be a fine analogy if he mentions that it describes a person that eats meat, because it's considered the best food for e.g. a sportsman or an actor on a muscle building diet. Comparing a vegan to a bicyclist seems also a big stretch, because the argument from the beginning was that being a vegan today (at least in the USA) is not at all that inconvenient, you're in a restaurant and you simply choose something else from the menu.

I still don't get the argument of moral superiority of defying the natural order by eating only plants instead on both animals and plants as we are supposed to do by biology.

@@TheNezharMC actually biologically we are closest to herbivores and frugivores. Animals that are meant to eat meat can actually TEAR THE ANIMAL FLESH DIRECTLY form their body and just EAT everything

@@animalsarebeautifulpeople3094 Tell that to the canine teeth. Also our brain is as big as it is because of the increased nutrient income. Well if you want to become an Australopithecus afarensis again, go with it. Our ancestors were frugivores indeed, that's why we have most of the teeth for that purpose, although not all of them. Also by ancestors I'm saying the Australopithecus as all Homo hominids were part carnivore. Homo erectus had better speed for persecuting prey, for example. We had better brain to make traps and advanced weapons. It is always a system to gather food, nonetheless, and fruit is easy to come by, specially in african jungle or savannah.

@@TheNezharMC the animals with the biggest canines are vegan.

@@YourVeganFriendTonia Our canines aren't as big and in the same form as them, they're the canines of a carnivore + the teeth in the last part are of a frugivore , thus, we are omnivores. Like boars. That was strangely poetic.

I've been without meat for a little over 1 month now, i just wanted to see how my body reacts if i dont eat any meat. Feels really good and i don't actually want meat anymore.

@@GaleGummola being vegan and not eating meat are not the same

@@dodumichalcevski i know, just shared my experience.

@@GaleGummola ouh okay well thank you but it is like you said you dont feel a difference in your body.. maybe only bloodpressure

@@dodumichalcevski actually i said i feel the difference. Much less fat in my diet now and lost weight.

Maybe Cosmic should have asked him how plausible the idea of animal suffering is to him. Since we all evolved the same way, I don't see it as very far fetched at all that animals also evolved to experience some level of suffering. As for suffering less than humans... humans most likely experience suffering in more psychological ways than other animals can. But something scary to think about is Dawkins once speculated something interesting: He speculated that perhaps dumber animals suffer even MORE acutely than humans since they don't have the mental capacity to avoid danger like we can so they evolved a stronger sense of suffering to compensate.

As someone who farms and ranches I can say that cow/calf separation can be a huge stress relief for the animals, especially the cows. Matt being on a farm could certainly have seen that as well.

@Guido Stockmans, oh, can you even explain to us all what Matt's position even is?

Neal Mastel as a rancher, I can confirm this is true. They also walk right onto the killing floor in slaughter houses. When the pigs are dipped in carbon dioxide they practically scramble to get into the cages. Trust me, animals want this to happen. I’m a rancher, I couldn’t possibly have any bias one way or the other.

@@jaymiddleton1782 I'm not sure I understand you and Neal Mastel, are you guys saying the mothers WANT to be separated from their calfs, and the animals WANT to die? sounds very strange to me. Haven't worked on a farm but all animals I've seen have a strong self preservation drive, and most mammals have a strong mothering instinct, so I find that extremely hard to believe.

That's because he's only confident if he's in charge. Take away his nuclear option to hang up on you, and he has nothing.

It’s not just his show, he’s being forced to talk about something he can’t back up. So yes it’s the fact he’s not on his own show because he can’t hang up on them but it’s the content more than anything else.

To be fair, any intelligent person would likely be in his position. If you spent time reflecting on the topic and you are sufficiently informed, guess what, that means you are already vegan.

It's one thing shutting down confused laymen callers on a topic you've been professionally debating for years, quite another talking in person to someone just as smart as you, who has good arguments and knows how to use them.

Very good observation

Or just eat eggs from your own pet chickens - who live a nice life and don't suffer.

@@SylvanApe This is a serious question, not a troll. What do you do with your male chickens? To have non-fertilized eggs, you need to control your male chicken population. How does a vegan do that within their own systems?

@@craigcompton1 Make a nice "boys only" free range farm where they can live happy lives. Or just use genetic manipulation to get the desired ratio of m/f.

@@SylvanApe That's interesting. Is that not torture though, for the males, to be forced to live in celibacy? And why not for the hens as well, caged and deprived of a fundamental need?

@@BigHeretic So you are worried about chicken sex rights (sorry, too good a chance not to say this). I appreciate the overriding moral stance but how far is the leap to plant rights and your starvation from there? We are an animal, just like any other. I agree that we need to eat WAY less meat than we do, for many reasons including the rights of other life. But I have yet to get a clear reason as to why it's ok to kill some life and not others.

Organic meat is not from factory farms. Alex’s argument for veganism seems to only address this unhealthy way of raising animals when we know there are other forms. Also, his argument from a health perspective seems to ignore that a moderate amount of lean meat helps to provide a balanced diet, and, instead, he really focuses in on highly saturated, processed meat. The method seems slightly disingenuous to me. The argument for veganism seems to only work on an emotivist perspective when considering these other variables.

@@nofame7016 Well, the issue is that Matt wouldn't even concede to giving up *factory farmed* animal products, despite considering them immoral, and was consistently dodging questions. Additionally, all farm animals are harmed, regardless if it's factory farmed or organic. Besides the slaughter itself, you got dehorning, forced insemination, castration, tail docking, beak trimming, taking babies away from their mothers, genetic mutations from breeding, and more. It's a common misconception that lean meat is healthy. There are much better sources of protein for a balanced diet, that don't have all the negatives of meat. Such sources include beans, lentils, tofu, seitan, chickpeas, nuts, and seeds. One problem with meat is that it's high in saturated fat and cholesterol, which both clog your arteries and increase your risk of heart disease, and are not exclusive to any form of meat. You also have toxins that arise from cooking meat at high temperatures, called heterocyclic amines, again, not exclusive to any specific type of meat. Eggs and dairy products increase your risk of prostate cancer tremendously, and so do chicken and fish cooked at high temperatures. Then there's the loads of bacteria and diseases from meat. You got salmonella, e. coli, yersinia, mad-cow, spanish flu, covid-19, avian influenza, trichiniasis and more. On top of all that, meat eating is directly linked with obesity, has been shown to cause erectile dysfunction, contains large amounts of hormones (yes, even organic meat), and increases total mortality. You're right that veganism is about animal rights, and that's because veganism extends beyond food, and opposes all forms of animal harm. But there's a reason why some people eat a plant-based diet, without the motivation from an animal-welfare perspective, and that's because science shows that animal products are unhealthy to consume, and come with a wide-variety of issues that are absent in plant foods.

young old guy From what source are you getting that lean meat is unhealthy? I’ll admit you can get protein sources from other places like beans, soy meat, and vitamins, but certainly you’re not going to lie and say lean, baked or grilled meat is unhealthy. Again, the problem seems to lie with the methodology and capitalistic system for the production of meat. You’re looking at corrupt parts and basing your whole argument on it. Just to clarify, what is your moral system and how does that relate to animals and not plants?

young old guy Also, soy meat, which is the only thing close to being complete in protein source, has a ridiculous amount of estrogen. What type of meat (fried, baked, lean, fatty) is very important in the health argument. Otherwise, you are giving disingenuous statistics. Of course a burger cooked at 500 degrees in oil at McDonalds is bad for you. The same would be true for a soy burger. Like I said before you can receive many of the nutrients provided in meats through vitamin supplements, but the question is what moral grounds do you have for eating animals as wrong besides an emotivist one, which exists on a personal basis? As a moral subjectivist based on human pleasure, I fail to see Alex’s argument for it, but I’m curious what yours is

​@@nofame7016 First, you can look at the nutrition for stuff like chicken and turkey, which are both high in cholesterol and saturated fat. Yes, grilling meat is unhealthy. Here is one source: www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/causes-prevention/risk/diet/cooked-meats-fact-sheet Capitalism certainly makes aspects of production worse, but the unhealthiness and immorality of meat production is not intrinsic to capitalism. For example, killing an animal is necessary if you want to eat meat, regardless of the economic system. So is castration in order for the meat to be tender, so is dehorning in order to keep animals in confined spaces and/or prevent accidents to workers, and the same is true for many other aspects of animal ag. My moral system is roughly the same as most people's. I'm against harming other sentient beings i.e those that are conscious and capable of feeling pain. If you're against harming humans, dogs, and cats, you could also ask yourself the same question. That said, plants lack a central nervous system, which is what allows for consciousness and pain-feeling. Additionally, more plants are necessarily killed for an omnivorous diet than a plant-based diet, because you have to feed tons of plants to the animals that you consume, and more plants than you could ever consume in a lifetime. So even if I was morally opposed to harming plants, veganism would still be the moral choice.

Veganism is a slippery slope sir. If we give the same rights to life to all animals then what is next? Will pecidicide be banned next because bugs will suffer? Insects feel pain and billions of insects are killed every year.

@@JohnMorris-ge6hq that ain't no slippery slope. It is a necessary discussion to have and we need more science to make good decisions about the issue. Using pesticides by the way is a topic that needs to be critically disected anyway, since we have huge problems with them killing to many beneficial insects, which hurts us humans as well.

He did spend over an hour stringing bad arguments together but... Michael, you got it out of context. CosmicSkeptic was asking why veganism was something Matt avoided talking about as a subject. Matt clearly isn't dismissing veganism. He was explaining why and how he's known for dismissing veganism on the show, 'The Atheist Experience'. In the same breath he went into how veganism isn't relevant enough to his show to address to the utter exhaustion that the audience may have wanted to in the past. The context was essentially, "Not only is it irrelevant to that show, but the few callers who do bring it up make horrible arguments and I'm not gonna waste that sort of very limited time there. Which is why I'm here to talk to you instead."

@@JohnMorris-ge6hq That would absolutely be a slippery slope if that's what was being advocated for. Veganism doesn't simply presuppose that animals have equal rights to life as humans do. Because they don't, and we all know that. Lots of vegans defend affordable healthcare, but you're never going to see a vegan arguing for affordable healthcare for a deer or something. Ethical veganism is a conglomeration of different beliefs. I'm not vegan, but I can plainly see that people are vegans for different reasons. It's not like this is some hard push to blur the line between humans and other animals.

@@stealthbeastgaming I have to disagree here. Firstly Matt dismissed Veganism off hand on multiple occasion. Secondly he was presented with some good arguments in this (and prior conversations) and answered them badly and with inconsistencies. And finally... Lots of vegans called his show, until he started hanging up on them and saying he doesn't want to talk to them. Matt pretends to be a humanist but isn't willing to have a real argument about an important moral issue. On the calls I could see over some of this. But in this interview he showed me that he is just another white old dude who has settled his position and thinks he knows better than others.