That wasn’t you who said that. That was someone else, and you are not giving credit.

@@mirandahotspring4019 And no one else had a boat of any type? Not even the fishermen? Haha

I have always wondered how the guys decide among them self who should carry which human specific parasite (and sexual transmittable disease) for 8 months and how they decided which grand children should be "gifted" with them.

@@bobbyjbobbyj So tell us who said it. Give credit.🥱

@@Exodus20.7KJV The movie dogma reworded a joke in 1999 that Robin Williams wrote in 1986. That good enough?

Yes, it is thanks to what Ken Ham would call unreliable historical science.

Should see it in real life! Cool place for sure.

Hahahahaha

Bwahahahahahaha.

You and me both. But I'd personally rather visit the real thing, and see the stele on the original landing site above it. BTW, thank you for speaking up in the comments. Scoffers and kneejerk-skeptics don't care, but people who are unsure need to see that there's more evidence than they've been led to believe. Good work. God bless.

@@canbest7668 You're doing it right now. The real ark is a national heritage site in Turkey, where it was discovered by a pilot, then studied and partially excavated by Ron Wyatt. Wyatt also found the original landing site up the slope, and numerous pieces of fossilized *laminated wood,* complete with pitch oozed out the ends. Other artifacts include a framework of rivets and metal fixtures, made from alloys that included titanium and aluminum. Now Gerrit Aalen has two videos exploring the well-preserved lower decks with Turkish guides, and a 20-minute documentary shows Wyatt's excavations, as well as the Turkish commemoration ceremony. The geological phenomenon called the Great Unconformity, meanwhile, is called a "billion year gap in the fossil record," and presents itself as a mystery to evolutionists. But it's present across every continent we've excavated, and shows the bottom layer of a catastrophic global flood. "But the world is proven billions of years old," many falsely believe. Every form of radiometric and carbon dating conflicts with each other, and none can accurately date the age of new rocks formed by Mount St. Helens and Hawaiian volcanoes. These forms of dating "triangulate each other," or so it's claimed, but they're only trustworthy by fiat ("because we say so"). The age of the Earth and universe are more accurately dated by observations, including but not limited to: Fossils and sedimentary layers are quickly formed under the right conditions... Such as a global flood. Mount St. Helens proved this when it carved a 1/40 scale replica of the Grand Canyon in a matter of hours. There are fossilized trees at the bottom of Spirit Lake, which were climbed by people who still live. These "polystrate fossils" of trees stand on end due to the weight of their root balls as they were waterlogged and slowly sank. Not to mention the "gooey" dinosaur fossils found with skin and vascular tissues. Comets still exist, though the lifetimes of comets are known to be mere thousands of years. Oort Clouds were invented as a "recharging mechanism" for comets, but no Oort Cloud has ever been observed. Jupiter and Neptune still radiate x2 and x2.7 more heat, respectively, than they absorb from the sun. Neither has the capacity to generate new heat, and would've lost all their internal heat eons ago if they were billions of years old. When Voyager 2 passed through the solar system, creationist Dr. Russ Humphreys had *accurately* predicted the strengths of the magnetospheres for multiple outer planets. His calculations presupposed an age of just 6,000 years, and Voyager 2 was vindication. Based on its gradual escape from Earth's orbit, which moves on an exponential scale, astronomers show that our moon would've been within the Earth just a few million years ago. Secularists ignore this and presume it must've obviously separated from Earth four billion years ago, otherwise it conflicts with their timelines of evolution. Speaking of evolution, it's a theory rife with mistakes. One example... For decades it was believed that grass didn't evolve until long after sauropods died out... Until grass phytoliths were found in the coprolites of sauropod stomachs, in India (Science magazine, 2005). That was the discovery that finally caught up to the biblical description of "Behemoth," which perfectly describes a sauropod (it ate grass, it lived in the marsh and swamps, its neck vertebrae were air-padded *tubes* with the compression strength of *bronze,* its limb bones had the compression strength of *iron,* it used stones in its belly to digest, its muscular strength focused in its hips and belly, its tail was long and swaying like a cedar, humans could never tame it, and even the historically *epic* floods of the Jordan weren't enough to topple it). Not to mention all the archaeological evidence that keeps vindicating the bible. We have tablets sent by Enmerkar (Nimrod) to Noah (Lord Aratta) on Mount Ararat, demanding that "Lord Aratta" recognize him and trade with him. Shortly thereafter, Enmerkar's civilization on the Shinar plane dispersed in a diaspora, and carried their distinct style of earthenware for thousands of miles in all directions. That testifies to the Tower of Babel story. Then there's Sodom and Gomorrah, which were discovered... Even their graveyards burned, and the cities were never reclaimed, which should tell you something. Sulfur balls can still be found (and burned) in abundance where the Dead Sea receded after extinguishing them. There are Egyptian chariots lost under the Red Sea. Doug Petrovich found the inscriptions of Joseph's sons in the first Hebrew aleph-bet, within Egypt, where he also proved the location of the house of Joseph's wife. Mount Sinai's peak was found to be blackened by epic plasma discharge, and it even has the giant split boulder at its base that Moses was said to strike open. So many examples it takes books to contain the rest! There's a reason why every culture on Earth shared stories of giants and a global flood, with an ark. It's the same reason why true followers of Christ have always known that there's *only one human race...* We're all descended from Noah and Adam. We're all descended from Eve. This is now being proven in genetic tracing ("Traced" by Nathaniel Jeanson), which is vindicating *secular archaeologists* who found holes in conventional theories about migrations in the Americas. On, and on, and on it goes. This is a faith of reason and evidence. Even Jesus and his resurrection are well-established by the historian's craft, through extrabiblical sources and Messianic creeds that emerged within months (not generations). Yogis in India, monasteries in Nepal, and several Native American tribes all encountered Jesus 2,000 years ago (the Yogis thought him just another "ascended one," the Nepalese monasteries made paintings of him, and surviving American tribes remembered him as "Lord Huron"). To deny Jesus now would tear down the very standards that proved Ghengis Khan and Alexander the Great were real. Would you still rather believe in conventional modern theories, which are inconsistent and constantly moving goalposts? If that's what you'd rather believe, and you're willing to scoff and dismiss all of the above if an authority figure tells you so... Well, that'd be a kneejerk reaction. BTW, Churchianity is not Christianity. There's a reason the Vatican built St. Peter's Basilica and Pope Paul's Audience Hall to look exactly like snakes. The latter even looks like a snake from the inside, complete with fang pillars... Most of the modern Church is utterly captured by sun-worship and wicked manipulators, as you're no doubt aware. Christ warned that would happen.

@@canbest7668 If the evidence for the gospels are weak, so is the evidence for George Washington’s actions, and Cyrus the G. Insults (“funny, sad, ridiculous”) are the last resort for a lack of argument, BTW.

​@@canbest7668 *"If this was introduced as evidence in court as proof of a risen Jesus it would laughingly be thrown out."* Ironically, famous agnostic Simon Greenleaf (founder of Harvard Law School) put the Resurrection on trial. He converted afterward. By the way, the trend of "superior admissibility" took over the Law of Evidence in recent generations, allowing *more* evidence to be admitted under broader conditions. Secondhand sources are admissible unless a primary source can be found. An exception to "superior admissibility" is that starting after 1999, expert witnesses are supposedly under more scrutiny. But Simon Greenleaf would have far more evidence, and an easier time admitting it, were he to put the Resurrection on trial today. But what did the founder of Harvard Law School know? I'll laugh with you on that one. *-we don’t know who wrote the gospels so there are no eye witness accounts* False. Not only did Paul (a Pharisee) interview the eyewitnesses, some of those eyewitnesses lived long enough to dictate letters. There are 59 eyewitness details in the gospel of John alone, with the third-person mode being a formality. I foresee the argument "then those details were made up," and raise you "then the vast majority of accounts and details about historical figures must be thrown out, even if they'd stand up in a court of law or a historian's thesis." *-it’s highly unlikely it was written by the apostles as they probably were illiterate and spoke Aramaic and not Greek which is the writing of the Gospels* Assumption. Travelers were more often than not multilingual, and all were capable of dictation. Greek was also a popular trade language in that time and region. *-the earliest fragments of manuscripts were written long after Jesus died* False. P137 was certified to be from the first half of the first century. EDIT: Oxyrhynchus Papyrus 5345 is the new name. I double-checked, and the first paleographer was wrong. It dates to the 2nd century. This appears to be the only raw spot in this entire comment. END EDIT We now have multiple fragments from the second century (which you should count, if you believe anything historians write about George Washington). Together the 2nd and 3rd century fragments account for about 43% of all NT verses in 2018. Meanwhile, the emergence of "Jesus was Messiah" creeds came within a very short time span (within months or short years), and caused immediate social upheaval in the region, as attested by numerous records (both written and archaeological). *-the books we have today do not at all resemble the early manuscripts* False. Instead, the papyri function to confirm what New Testament scholars already suspected was the original wording based on the style of later changes, or, in some cases, to confirm an alternate reading-but one that is already found in the manuscripts. Example: "Jesus" and "The Lord" being used interchangeably within reasonable context. None of the major details misalign. The greatest difference found was that the Number of the Beast was 616, not 666, but this might've been an error in that particular copy. *-the writings were based on the awful and unreliable oral tradition* Careful. Trained oral tradition was so reliable, Aboriginal Australians remembered the rise and fall of ocean levels, as well as long-extinct megafauna. Numerous African tribes rely solely on oral tradition for their genealogies. Mnemonic devices may be forgotten in the modern West, but they're alive and well throughout most of the world. Look up historian Jan Vansina's "Oral Traditions as History." *-the gospels contain many contradictions* So you've been told. Name one. While you're at it, learn about "undesigned coincidences" (also called "overlapping stories" and "complementary details"). They're used to prove in courts that eyewitnesses didn't collaborate to cook up a story. *-some parts look like they were just copied from the Old Testament* Quoting the work you're citing is not "copying." *-the few non biblical texts mentioning Jesus came many years after his death so they are based on hearsay* False. Numerous surviving letters cited "The Acts of Pontius Pilate" and other sources from Jesus' lifetime (or shortly afterward). Historians accept these sources as proof that "The Acts of Pontius Pilate" existed, since at least two Emperors received such letters and wrote back with no objections about the parts mentioning Jesus. "The Acts of Pontius Pilate" was lost, but so was most of the work of Plato, and who objects to Plato's work even after it was reconstituted from Middle-Eastern translations? *-which is very interesting given he was followed by so many people and was well known to the Pharisees and the Romans. You’d think there would be many accounts of his activities.* There were many accounts, as mentioned above. The Pharisees wrote that Jesus was performing "miracles of The Enemy," and accused him of sorcery. The Babylonian Talmud calls him "Yeshu. Look it up. The earliest pages about him in that Talmud date from the first century. *-the gospels align in some important ways with the story of Jesus ben Ananias suggesting how easy it would be to confuse him with someone else* Incredible. Jesus Ben Ananias lived just 66 years later, with far fewer evidences, yet you'd use a copycat to disprove the original? Your standards for evidence are all over the place. *-and no one ever has been able to demonstrate miracles have and do happen* Tell that to the thousands who receive immediate and miraculous healing every year, including people about to die of cancer who pray for healing (or are prayed over) and immediately lose all their tumors. Better yet, talk to the doctors who testify on their behalf! It's not just cancer, people have had their vision and hearing miraculously restored, including children. The video testimonials are easy to find, and the doctors who witness the events often make videos renouncing their atheism or old faiths. There are also hospital reports of miracles on public record, and a significant portion of war veterans report miracles (not always Christian miracles). You're talking to someone who was warned by a voice that a truck was about to hit me head-on in my lane, about ten seconds before the truck finally rounded the bend through dense woods. Because this voice's warning made me afraid, I tapped the brakes and spent the next few seconds wondering how I'd explain a head-on wreck to my dad. THEN the speeding truck appeared. I had just enough time to dart into the ditch and watch my rearview mirror pass under theirs. But here's the best for last: *-there is no archaeological evidence of Jesus* You're behind the times. A large cave inscription was found in Beit Loya, showing an early (first century) pictogram of the cross, and the Greek words "Jesus Present." The inscription's letters match the time period when Romans intensely persecuted the rapidly growing Christian faith. Also, you'll no doubt roll your eyes to learn that the Shroud of Turin was beyond the means for 14th century Catholics to fake. Allow me to elaborate: First, it was originally dated incorrectly by carbon-14 readings, due to being damaged by a fire in the 15th century (not to mention, carbon-14 can't accurately date organic matter from Mount St. Helens' eruption). We can now firmly establish the Shroud was stolen from Byzantium, and moreover that its sequential images were made by a series of radiation bursts that created overlapping impressions (distinguished by Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) and Raman spectroscopy). When pieced together into a frame-by-frame sequence, these overlapping images form a film of Jesus' wrist re-socketing, his fists tightening and relaxing, and the nails popping out of his hands and feet. Still think a radioactive Byzantine faked it? Well, the burial garments around Jesus' waist were elaborate and lost to time after the Jewish Revolt and Jewish Diaspora in the first century... So those garments were completely unknown to Byzantines, much less 14th century Catholics, and the radiation was also beyond their means. That style of garment wasn't recovered and understood until recently, and a video below explains more. The blood sample within the Shroud only had 24 chromosomes (not 46), which matches an earlier blood sample found under Calvary by Ron Wyatt. My cousin Mary Lee was Ron Wyatt's last wife, and recently displayed the blood vial to show it hasn't been tampered with. To demonstrate his veracity, I say to you that Wyatt's definitive archaeology of Noah's Ark is required viewing on KZfaq, as it's only a 20-minute documentary, and it shows the Turkish government's commemoration ceremony for the site. It also shows expert testimonials, secular interviews, and the tech used. Gerrit Aalen has now gone inside the Ark in two videos. Ron Wyatt was always vindicated, but he didn't live to see that the blood sample he collected would later be found to match a blood sample from the Shroud of Turin. (keep in mind... he was never allowed access to the Shroud, and he expressed doubts about the Shroud because he lived before advanced spectrometry) For more information about the spectrometry and other research methods used on the Shroud, watch: "The new astonishing phenomenon detected on the Shroud" (spacereinstute) and "The Shroud of Turin - The Evidence of Authenticity - No Music" (The Word). Looking forward to any and all contradictions you can cite in the bible. Show me hundreds, if you wish.

@@canbest7668 You’re free to be crass and dismissive if that’s the only argument left to you. Accept by fiat whatever props up secularism, if you’d rather not do the due diligence. It’s exactly the behavior that creationists are accused of, though.

Hahahahaha

Hahahahaha

Bwahahahaha

Hahahahaha

While that is not directly Biblical, it would make sense that the animals would prove to be docile and controllable (as with the Peace of the Lord covering the whole earth during the Millennial Kingdom) and not violent or unwieldly during their tenure on the Ark.

I wondered the same thing, perhaps the more aggressive species were a lot more docile or sleeping. Once you accept that God is involved in something, no possibility can be discounted. After all, He’s not referred to as The Almighty for nothing. I hope I get to visit the ark one day. Take care and God bless 😊

It's the least He could do, since He drowned their habitats and killed all their friends.

"just like evolution affirms"

It might just be That God took control of the destiny of the Ark during its salvation, !!

@@theTavis01 no it doesn't

Huh?

@@CaptainFantastic222 Hmmm??

Are you serious?!

You should see the real thing on Mount Ararat. Gerrit Aalen has two videos exploring the interior with official Turkish guides. There's also a 20-minute documentary about the ark's discovery, Ron Wyatt's studies and excavations there, Turkey's commemoration ceremony for the site as a national heritage site, and more (Kerrigan Skelly has one version).

@TheLion&TheLamb exactly I agree with you

AMEN TO THAT!

that was probably nothing to seeing the whole world wiped out , the guys literaly saw an actual end of days

@Richard Fox 150 Days would be one part of the Flood, when the waters were at their highest.

While you are there, ask them how the guys decide among them self who should carry which human specific parasite for 8 months and how they decided which grand children should be "gifted" with them.

@@godergodel1649 I do not understand your cryptic message. But if it is negative, you can keep it to yourself. I'm in KY and we're going to the Ark Encounter tomorrow!!! 🎉

Tomorrow, great, I reformulate If you take a guided tour, ask the tour guide how Noa , his wife, their children and their wife's decided among themself which one of them should carry which human specific parasite that must have been carried by humans during the flood. And also ask the guide if it is known how they decided which of Noa's grandchildren should get which parasite.

About all this ark is good for is fire wood!

@@dennisconstantine624 I absolutely loved it!!!! ❤️

Science? Not even close

@A L Abel was killed by Cain an Adam had a son Seth and daughters Genesis 5:3,4 an Cain took wives of those daughters Genesis 6:2,4 , causing some of the good lineage seed of Seth sisters to marry the bad seed Cain an when Cain had children they continued marrying each other, that's why I believe Cain children lineage had the same names as some of Seth children lineage, but mixing good seed with bad seeds(Children) made bad fruit, so corrupt, that Yah flooded tha earth. An the Church passed down from tha false doctrine of tha Pope an Roman catholic Church taught us that fallen angel had children by tha daughters of men, an to prove this was false Hebrews 1:5 says: For to which of the Angels did He ever say: "You are my son today I have begotten you"? Also nowhere else in Scripture do you see angels having children? And angels don't have sperm/semen. Last point if fallen angels can have children why did they need to possess a body instead of just keep having children? In all our getting get understanding Hallalu"YAH" praise YAH Shalom

Not really. Methane and CO2 sinks to the lower decks and kills everything there in a couple of days. Nice try though.

@@davidgardner863 🙄

One leg at the time ;) By the way, 40 days, it is 8 month, it only rained for 40 days.

I get nauseated listening to Hams ridiculous explanations, just shows how money can make some people do and say anything.

Sometime i find it a little cute that they try so hard to make it believable.

@@godergodel1649 people actually believe that Elon musk is going to fly to mars, create an atmosphere, forests, lakes and farms and then populate the planet.. can you imagine..

@@Trythis837 " people actually believe that Elon musk is going to fly to mars, create an atmosphere, forests, lakes and farms and then populate the planet.. can you imagine.." oh, is that so, I personally put an effort in to ignore that guy, but even if so, time will tell if his employers will pull it off.

@Richard Fox lmfao!! Are you threatened by the idea that this is true? Does this scare you to think that the things from the Bible are actually true? Does this threaten you because if this is true then the rest of the Bible is true as well? If your beliefs can be so easily be threatened then that seems to mean what you believe in doesn't have strength enough to withstand any real debate. I personally knew the man who discovered it and have seen the visitors center observation deck. His name is Ron Wyatt and Noah's ark wasn't the only biblical archeological site that he discovered. You can visit his museum at Connersville, Tennessee. You should look into something before you think you know what you're talking about. Unfortunately Ron has since passed and is sleeping in and waiting for Jesus' return, but you can still speak with his sons and wife who were with him on these expeditions.

@Richard Fox it's sad and I feel very sorry for you because the man who found it was a good family friend and he was not a lier and if you actually took the time to go and read his research... but again you are blinded by hate and are threatened by the fact that you actually might be wrong and someone else could be correct. And it must scare you if you actually found out that you were gonna end in complete oblivion and be as if you never were and that's why I feel sorry for you because I don't want to see anyone die in a lost state loosing their chance at eternal life! I want everyone to be able to live forever, it's sad to think of all the people are gonna never be ever again 💔. But instead of having an intelligent debate all you have is no, no and no. Your beliefs obviously couldn't stand up against the truth. I pray for you and hope you find peace and happiness in your life and wish you the best with such a closed mind.

@@z.louisecoombsrambouillet8395 I’m not saying who is lying, but someone is lying. Not even any religious organizations agree with your false claim. No ark has been found.

Ok so go visit the Ark in Turkey and send me a photo of it.

I just remembered this morning that the discovery and museum of Noah's Ark was on the show Mysterys at the Museum on the Discovery Channel!

Well then make it clear and realistic and give proper evidence and details of what happened. Not what the Bible says...really and u still believe. Com on

@@trevorstieger6762 Who is to say exactly what happened, the Bible, both the OT and NT don't have complete answers. What we are told is enough, beware those who fill in the gaps with stories that take you away from God and towards man who seeks power and control over you! Some scream that there is zero evidence for anything scriptural but in all reality they are rejecting the evidence we have and demanding a "sign"! They lack faith, cling to the science of this world! They cannot explain what caused the big bang or provide the missing link which in the end requires double the faith!

Or headlice. I mean we really could have managed without them today.

Yes, and not only that, how did they decide who should carry which human specific parasite/bacteria/viruses for a year and how did they decide which grand children should "inherit" the stuff. Like crabs, headlice, Malaria, tape worms, gonorrhoea

Who says any animals were dangerous to mankind before the fall? God made animals and seen that they were perfect at that time. Man was master over the animals. They may have obeyed man at the time and moved to another area if man wanted them to. It could have been that certain humans were mean to them. The may have been treated bad the way man treats animals today. Starving, unreasonable bandage, experiments performed, and DNA manipulation.

@@MusicEchos When we talk of Nimrod, we don't speak of before the Fall, but of after the Flood.

This is a story, not history.

@@debsnyder6912 History are stories from the past believed to be true about the past they report about.

"History are stories from the past believed to be true about the past they report about." Yes, like when Zeus turned himself into a bull to seduce a women

Or a hybrid. Ya know how pitbulls can have those green piercing eyes? I have seen a few people with eyes just like that, and they are all mixed race.

@@bradleysmith9431 OK. Could be a clue to the origin of the Achaean ruling class if Walter Leaf was right about what was going on.

Incredible observation. I’ve never seen an unscientific post return racist so quickly and unexpectedly. Great job.

@@bobbyjbobbyj It's not a racist agenda to observe that what to some looks like impossible biology is really a kind of precisely racist slur.

@@hglundahl not sure your reply makes any sense, but the original comment is still unscientific and racist. People who make racist comments are commonly oblivious to why the statements are racist, or they disagree the statements are racist. Neither case means the statements aren’t racist. Turns out this one was.

The size and shape of the Ark, is almost exactly the same size and shape as a modern Cargo Ship, which is able to carry unbelievable amounts of cargo, and last through giant ocean swells without breaking.

An ark is something that provides protection and safety. It doesn't matter what shape it's in. As for the ark Noah built, it seems more reasonable that it would have been somewhat streamlined because it still would have moved through the water due to the intense hurricane winds and waves on the surface. The only difference from barge ships is that the ark did not need any capability for steering/navigation.

Hi you may find this interesting (or not lol) some uni students built an ark scaled down and put it in a wave tank ( probably on KZfaq somewhere ) anyway the ark didn’t sink, is was a successful experiment.

@@cliffords2315 You do know modern cargo ships are not made from wood, using ancient building techniques from the bronze age, don't you?

@@cliffords2315, Cargo ships are made of steel, duh!

I am amused every time a new ridiculous hypothesis pops up to explain how this objectively untrue mess could have happened. There is a field of study called biology. Not all animals hibernate, and the ones who do don’t hibernate for that long.

@@bobbyjbobbyj - My point is that filling in these blanks is fraught with doctrinal peril. They get so focused on this trivia that they neglect the big picture. They go so far as to say that nothing died prior to Adam's sin. Did Adam eat? I think he did. Eating REQUIRES that things die and decompose. The Apostle Paul says that because of sin, death entered into the world but he's not talking about the death of insects, microbes, and animals. The death that he (and God) was talking about was the death of Adam himself. How does a person who had never seen something die grasp the concept of death? How do I describe a color you've never seen before? You need a point of reference. But whole doctrines are based on this teaching - that nothing died until Adam sinned. It requires a completely different universe and thereby disconnects those beginnings from us. I could go on but I'm already straying from the topic of my OP.

@@GizmoFromPizmo doesn’t it seem silly that some all-knowing, all-powerful being created an entire universe, then decided that if people did things he didn’t like (after he tempted them), he decided to invent a concept of death? Doesn’t that sound like a myth to you? And as for describing a new color, just tell me the wavelength. That’s how science works. No mythology…just science.

@@bobbyjbobbyj - In all honesty, shaking one's fist at God and complaining, "Why hast thou made me thus?", is a bit of a waste of time. If the Creator did something, we can be sure He has His reasons. Second guessing or Monday morning quarterbacking is not profitable - especially when it's done with an attitude. Knowing God helps in cases like this. Attitude is surely everything. Are there things I might have done differently? Sure. But who am I to criticize? When you learn who God is then you start to see the why's and wherefore's. Why did God tempt man? Because He made us in His image and He is tempted. Why did God boot Adam out of the Garden instead of simply removing the Tree of Life? I'll ask Him that when I get there. Attitude comes with maturity. It may sound cool, trendy, or smart to cop an attitude but when you've been around awhile you learn how futile that stuff is. Why is earth the only planet with a moon of its size? Honestly, who cares? As they say, It is what it is. Why is the way of life entered through the strait gate? God has His reasons. Always think, "Filtration". God is filtering out folks. Why? He has His reasons.

@@GizmoFromPizmo I don’t even know what you’re trying to say. Beyond that, your error is assuming there’s a god and that I’m shaking my fist at him. If I believe he doesn’t exist, it’s not that, at all. I have no negative feelings for the Easter Bunny.

I forgot that with many juveniles entering on the last week before the Flood, there would also be some growth of the actual animals, increasing the passenger weight as food weight decreases.

Couldn't they just throw the poop and other bodily waste overboard? It's not like they're going to pollute the entire world "ocean" enough for it to be a problem. It's like one drop of rain in the ocean. They're surrounded by water.

@@222ableVelo My problem with that is: * it is a waste of possible post-Flood fertiliser and perhaps also of fuel on the Ark, to have light and heating; * it makes the load lighter and might therefore involve a risk of destabilising the Ark. The second point would be not too bad if they were continually fishing around the Ark ... But apart from that, it could have been at least an option.

I hope you’re joking.

They didn't have babies on the ark but they had fetuses in jars next to the fire fly jars.

They weren't dangerous to Noah and his family. God probably made them all very docile. Poop probably was cleared with brooms into a aisle receptacle and dumped overboard or used for some other purpose

Probably magic, just like all the rest of the story.

There’s another video of them showing the ark! For that there was a construction below the cages that was pulled out when necessary

They did not..... because it didn't happen 🤣

all animals can be tamed , though some are undomesticable . we do it all the time

This ark was made in our time, they used wood bolts in past.

@@jacquirichmond6107 ahh yes. Good old wood bolts. Lol.

Of course it's a modern reconstruction...... don't be silly. And no one knows what construction techniques Noah used exactly. You really think they're going to go that far in the re-enactment? It's for showing the size and ability to hold the animals, that the account really is possible. That's what's really tripping you up? Noah and his family had about 100 years to build this thing. That's plenty of time. You know what's really a fairytale? Fish growing legs to come up on land lol. Dinosaurs magically turning into birds. Apes turning into humans -- what a fairytale.

Keep in mind, regardless of time, there have always been profession specialists... So even if people may have mocked Noah, contractors would've probably been involved in its construction as well.

@@222ableVelo evolution hairbrush over millions of years. You think that's a fairytale but have no pricked believing that God blew life into rocks and boom humans? That's called a golem spell. There's tons of evidence of evolution. None of the tales in the Bible.

@Betty that’s not a fact. It’s hardly even a theory.

Misunderstanding. According to the Biblical report God brought the animals to him, not the opposite

@@kurtbeutler1728 Animals have God given migratory instincts that scientist still can't understand. In great disaster like drought they all migrate as if following a map to safety. The coming flood triggered the instinct alarm God built that dna into them, it told them to go to Noah.

Maybe.. and here’s a crazy thought.. the boy rat and the girl rat fell in love, got married and had some baby rats.. just an idea

True

But still it might have been cages

Because a cage is still technically a room

How about the POLAR BEARS, where were they kept?

@@chattcedric6321 Two young adult bears in an enclosure to themselves, same as every other reproductive unit. Polar bears resulted from later migrations.

You are right there is not enough water on the world or inside the world to completely cover all land on earth.

I find it interesting that more than a few scientists believe there was enough water on Mars to cover its surface, despite the lack of water we actually observe today.

Consider that the ark is described as being made of wood. The lack of a remnant of a ship such as the ark thousands of years later isn't a solid argument against its existence. I can see someone keeping a wood ship from falling apart over a few centuries, the USS Constitution being a prime example, but upwards of five millennia is highly unlikely. Given that Scripture is silent on any efforts that went into preserving the ark, it's entirely within the realm of reason for the whole thing to have rotted away some time after the flood. As for the worldwide flood, the point that can be made is really quite simple. First, if all the land was low-lying, it's far easier to flood. Second, there is Pangaea. If all the land is concentrated in a single super continent, and is very low lying, then it's entirely possible to flood the whole earth. Third, and final, there is geologic evidence that suggests that there was a point when the earth was a water world. This is consistent with all of the above, and when you consider a recent genetic study that suggests that upwards of 95% of all life on the earth emerged at the same time, what you see is evidence for a massive, worldwide catastrophic event that covered the whole earth in water and wiped out virtually all life. I'd be more than willing to conclude that it definitely happened, and that the biblical account is the most accurate and reasonable account in existence. There are dozens, if not hundreds, of cultures all over the world that still tell stories of the earth flooding, and those stories generally follow the same pattern. I don't think it's accidental or coincidental. I tend to see it as evidence.

@@63phillip lmao😂😂🤦🤦 yes there IS, there is more than enough water and its been making environmentalists crazy everytime they measure it

@@cedriceric9730 What scientific publication was that written I would love to read it.

It got tossed overboard

Exactly, the entire story is B/S but when you make as much money as Ham you believe your own crap. Imagine a drunk like Noah building a boat that cant support its own weight let alone thousands of animals. Oh I forgot God made it happen, yeh right.

Maybe you should research, then speak

​@@jacquirichmond6107 I don't need to research so much of the bible has been proven wrong and I know there is no god the tooth fairy told me!

Read the Bible. It tells you.

@@222ableVelo yes and it's not true 🙄

Is the platypus the last living member of that class?

@@WisdomThumbs not entirely sure, i wouldn't think so but they're probably my most favourite oddities in the mammalian kingdom!

And huge piles of lion feces

nah, noah could easily take some lion cubs

@@cedriceric9730 where did lions come from in the middle eastern desert? Just don’t try to make arguments against science. Just say you don’t understand and prefer to believe one specific book…that your 1 god of 3000 possible gods is the only one…the one you happened to be the prevalent one in the geographical region you were born. Curious, isn’t it, that people happen to believe in the god popular in their region but fail to see how regional myths are generated. Nah, you were just lucky to be born where you were.

@@cedriceric9730 how did baby lion cubs walk from Africa to the ark? Thats a looong way. They'd be dead within the first few hours of their journey. You Bible nutcases make me laugh lol

@@supermushroom3175 who told you africa existed in Noah's time?

What about animals who live for less than one year? You know, those flies what live for one day and stuff?

Well I'm sure they would have had plenty of sea food....... and maybe even whales

Almost all meat eating animals are omnivores. Cats, seals, eagles, and walruses are oblegate carnivers, they are the only ones that can't survive by eating plants.

with salted meat! they had nearly 200 years to prepare the very best

In every scientific and objective measure, this was not only impossible, it has been proven to not have happened. Your answer to the impossibility: magic.

@@bobbyjbobbyj It was God's supernatural powers... so, in a way, it was a type of magic.

@@BrendaLee381 never happened. There were entire civilizations that existed before, during and after the supposed flood. They have records of their history throughout that period. It objectively never happened. There are no mixing of layers of fossils, as one would expect based on a young earth and great flood. Why did zero fishermen survive by using their own boats? Where did the non-indigenous species come from to be placed on an ark in the Middle East? And where is any physical evidence? And why are there no fossil remains in the Middle East for the non-indigenous species who would have certainly lost some members? And there’s no way to fit every species on the ark; don’t cite that a “kind” is different, because there’s no such thing. Lastly, why would god save innocent animals but murder innocent infants? Seems god doesn’t value infants.

@@bobbyjbobbyj Then why is there a remain of the Ark in Turkey of Mt. Ararat which is where the Bible says the ark has landed and it still sits on the mountain til this day.

@@alexdrake8079 there are no remains. That has been disproven. Even biblical scholars don’t believe that.

Are these people for real?!

The real ark is a national heritage site on Mount Ararat, Turkey. Its rivets contained advanced alloys including titanium and aluminum. Laminated wood (glued with pitch) was found petrified in the site. Gerrit Aalen now has videos showing his officially-guided descent into the lower levels, which are remarkably intact. And a 20-minute documentary shows Ron Wyatt's excavations, as well as Turkey's commemoration ceremony for the site (it's on Kerrigan Skelly's channel). We also have clay tablets from Enmerkar (Nimrod) to Lord Aratta (Noah) sent to and fro between the Shinar plain and Mount Ararat. Enmerkar demanded that the old man recognize him as cool, and also demanded that "the Lord Aratta" trade gold and lapus lazuli with him. Shortly thereafter, the people of the Shinar plain dispersed in a diaspora, and took their distinct earthenware and bricks for thousands of miles in all directions. Tower of Babel.

Ok so go visit the Ark in Turkey and send me a photo of it. I didn't see it when I was in Turkey.

Ron Wyatt is rubbish, nothing of what he claimed to have discovered have been demonstrated to exists.

It rained for 40 days and 40 nights. I doubt that it would take another 10.5 months for the water to drain away.

@Richard Fox That's alright with me if you feel that unicorns inhabit the moon. Whatever rocks your casbah I suppose like the song. Thankfully in countries like the U.S.A we're free to follow whatever we want and interpret the evidence however we want. Thanks for your response though despite whatever you might think of my views.

@Richard Fox I'd certainly hate to be an individual especially one trying to follow Christianity in a country such as North Korea or China. Christians in countries such as the U.S. have it made where the worst that would likely happen is people laughing, mocking and verbally putting down those who believe and try to spread the message that the Bible has.

you have already been scientificaly vindicated. if you get a single seed and breed it over and over again, you gonna end up with an astonishimg variety over time ,If you allow it

you have already been scientificaly vindicated. if you get a single seed and breed it over and over again, you gonna end up with an astonishimg variety over time ,If you allow it

yes , there was no reason to pack huge adults. juveniles would suffice. and God has proven very wise at using given resources , keeping a few animals alive is comparatively easy

Even if you have 10 of every "kind" (because species arent a thing apparently), the resulting genetic bottlenecking still kills the kind, and so would 200, or even 300.

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

Yes. The real ark is a national heritage site on Mount Ararat, Turkey. Its rivets contained advanced alloys including titanium and aluminum. Laminated wood (glued with pitch) was found petrified in the site. Gerrit Aalen now has videos showing his officially-guided descent into the lower levels, which are remarkably intact. And a 20-minute documentary shows Ron Wyatt's excavations, as well as Turkey's commemoration ceremony for the site (it's on Kerrigan Skelly's channel). If you're willing to risk danger and arrest, you too can visit the site and go spelunking within. We also have clay tablets from Enmerkar (Nimrod) to Lord Aratta (Noah) sent to and fro between the Shinar plain and Mount Ararat. Enmerkar demanded that the old man recognize him as cool, and also demanded that "the Lord Aratta" trade gold and lapus lazuli with him. Shortly thereafter, the people of the Shinar plain dispersed in a diaspora, and took their distinct earthenware and bricks for thousands of miles in all directions. Tower of Babel.

Sadly, yes, these people actually pretend these lies are true.

People really believe this stuff, yes.

Ron Wyatt, hahha

People really believe fish grew legs and walked on land, and that apes turned into humans too. Either way, you're believing a miracle. I'd go with the miracle God said, instead of the miraculous tale Darwin came up with. Which fairy-tale are you going to believe in? Are you going to believe God or Darwin and the people like him, before and after him?

Careful, they don't appreciate logic being used. Much easier to believe in magic.