And you are called a lunatic. 😁☝️ to think it travelled three hundred thousand kilometers with a car battery and a lawn mower powered engine in 3 days.🤪DAAAH! I'd keep that quiet if I were you.🤣bahahaha!

I thought that *I Had put a good joke up here* but yeah. _YOU_ are actually 100% correct Funny *AND True!*

Awesome.

When Russia put the first man in space the Americans were asked how it happened, and they replied, "Their German scientists were better than our German scientists

There was that documentary in 2012, I believe it was called Iron Sky......😆

Germs got the crap kicked from Russia till this day.😁👍🇬🇷

The only thing the pulled off was their deafete than and the loosers they are again Those missiles they created and rockets are being used against them. So brilliant . Daaahh!🤪

AGREED!

They seemed to find time to hunt for artifacts in Egypt. They built hundreds of rockets and jet engines, experimented with magnetics, etc. I'm not saying they sent people to the moon, but maybe they launched a rocket at the moon.

Yeh they cant get there tanks out of the mud without the help of a Russian tow truck to pull it out of the mud.🤣BAHAHAHA! THEY ARE GONNA GO TO THE MOON WITH THAT CRAP THEY ARE BUILDING.😁👍

exactly!!! i posted the same thing then saw ur comment.. i'm still gonna leave my comment but yes, u hit the nail on the head - i think this whole thing is one stupid money grab for gullible ppl...

No, that's not true, there is no telescope on Earth that can see evidence of humans ever been on the moon, not even the Hubble Space Telescope.

Shhh! They will be upset.🤫

Not true - there is no telescope on Earth that can resolve objects that small. It's possible theoretically but not practically. You would need at least a 200 inch reflector. Check your facts - a simple google search will confirm what I say.

Not even the Hubble could see what's left on the moon. It's designed to collect faint light of galaxies and nebulas, not objects on the moon. From Earth, we would require a telescope at least 75 feet (25 meters) across to spot a 32-foot (10-meter) object on the moon.

No telescope on earth can do this. Only a spy satellite could, but we don't point those at the moon. We did leave laser reflectors though. If you fire a high powered laser from Earth, you don't get a reflection from the Moon but if you aim at the reflector, you get the return. So we can definitely demonstrate there is technology on the Moon, we just can't see it with telescopes.

There is a great documentary about that called Iron Sky ;)

Interview the widows of the dead astronauts and let me know what they say.

You never need not worry about being wrong you’re on the right path about secret craft now a days they are cloaked and with powerful weapons onboard, theres great profits in making war so they keep putting out jets and tanks they never show what they really have , they have money to burn on wild projects that the gullible believe man can not achieve! But it is the total opposite we are in the future.

What is the radiation belt ? a big problem today ? why is that ? The moon and space are not what you think it is . Not harmful at all .

That's everything I've Ben taught to. Who's liying the most here ?

A led box ??

Van Allen radiation belt is not perfect. Apollo took the least dangerous path.

The Apollo missions minimized the danger from the Van Allen radiation belts by: Trajectory Planning: They chose paths that avoided the most intense areas. Speed: The spacecraft traveled quickly through the belts, reducing exposure time. Shielding: The spacecraft's structure provided some protection. Exposure Limits: The radiation dose was low and within safe limits for the brief transit time.

But, they could have gotten them from Antarctica. Something must be there. No country is allowed to cross certain areas of Antarctica. Why is that?

@@bettylinker4780 Why always this BS about antarctica? You can go anywhere, its just not recommended to fly in a straight line over it, because in case something happens, nobody will be able to help you. But you can if you insist. Also you need some proof that you are able to survive out there, then you are free to go wherever you want. To prevent conspiracy-nerds to get killed there is one reason to do so. "Normal" Airplanes are required to stay at a minimum distance to an airport in case of an emergency. That is why, not your conspiracy bullocks. Does this answer the provoking question "Why is that" ?

There is no "dark side" of the moon. You've been listening to too much Pink Floyd.

@@kbjerkeit’s dark to us

@@user-eo7oh8px9e Is the back of your head dark to you, too? 🤣

where do you think these ufos come from ?

@@saschaesken5524 Antarctica and the oceans 🙏

Yes. And if the Germans had achieved this, they would have told the whole world about it.

Not necessarily.

🤣

👍

@@RaverBpm kzfaq.infoX_TlP-p8Q7w?si=QWUfG9a073GpGPAj

Great Point 😂

They gave it a good crack but. Landed a lot of places. If it wasn't 4 the allies most of us be drinking Heineken.

The V1 (A4) was a single stage rocket. It was developed into the A5 etc, to A8 and 9 two stage rockets. They were tested at White Sands testing ground near Roswell, New Mexico, not far away from Los Alamos and the site for the first atomic bomb. No wonder the aliens sent their UFOs to investigate what went on near Roswell.

they told us this version, but we have not any clues

Rockets beyond the V-2 were built. These were two-stage rockets. The designations were A-9/A-10 followed by A-11 through A-14.

how absurd !

There were witnesses.

What we have are blue prints, photos and videos people like you interpret something into them, there is no proof at all. But why do we need any proof, we need conspiracy-theories, lots of them. Still listening to this Ancient-Alien "i-know-it-all-specialist" ? Get a life man. If this are blue prints of some anti gravity device, why nobody dares to build it ?

The Russians also got their share.

Germany did not use rockets, They hav Vermana/Vril space ships

Of course they did.

Same

The Germans had blue prints of a 2 stage delivery rocket. In was included in US military ordnance books.

@@ericwolf9482 Yes, seen them in books since I was a child. But never mentioned in this video. As far as I know, they were never built. Both the US and the USSR went with cylinders, rather than the standard V-2 on top of a giant V-2. I don’t recall the stats on that design, but had it ever been built, it looks like it could have made it to orbit.

Low Earth orbit: altitude 2000km. Kármán line, the most widely accepted boundary of space: altitude 100km. Which is used to differentiate aircraft and spacecraft. The two are not the same. An object can reach space without reaching orbit. But in general, this video seems nonsense, indeed

@@HoveringThunder Indeed. Yes, I’m sure a V-2 could reach the Karman line. But they stated orbit. To my knowledge, no one has managed SSTO, at least with a payload. Starship might be capable, just barely. But probably without a payload of any useful size.

@@evanmorris1178 this video is feeding on the ever growing tinfoilhat community of youtube. People in their right mind may take it as an entertaining thought but anyone taking it seriously, most ceertainly needs therapy

My meat was

Yesss

New York City was threatened in December, 1944.

The "bell" 😳

@@jaysonraphaelmurdock8812 die glocke wasn't a spaceship, it was a tele transpoter

They didn’t have any thing close to that, it was WW2 , they didn’t have the resources, even if they did it would be decades away. Even then no guarantees. People or getting carried away ! A lot of the nazis jet fighter designs were un flyable, they did have the technology to build them. Just wild imaginations.

Look up foo fighters. It's not just the name of a band.

@@scowi3 I know about FF. I meant to say German or anyone else at the time did not have the technology.

Have you forgotten who took us to the moon ? Wasn’t the Germans scientists who did 😂😂😂

@@footballlegacy5574 You are distorting reality.

But we've all been to your mom!

@@DavidVerbout so are you my daddy i been looking for you you owe us money.

@@jediknight2350 I have $5 bucks cash. Will that cover it?

@@DavidVerbout i want 6

@@jediknight2350 I suppose, with inflation and everything, that's fair.

Not according to Elon Musk

Wrong!!

Yes they did 😁