Have we forgotten that the ideas behind the one child policy were suggested by western institutions. Club of rome limits to growth, Kissinger & Brzezinski making the case for India under Indira.

Boring and so repetitive..this guy named 12 places for example and did so much bakwaas..all.bakwaas and no point.. LEARN TO DELIVER NEWS FROM PALKI SHARMA

..... Chutiya India had to accept BRI project and after China spending 50 billions dollars, India had to ban Chinese products like Italy did but Chutiya Indian leaders have no brains now.......India lost hundreds of billions dollars with China trade in last decades.........

............. ....India is already next Africa and not threat to USA.... USA will keep playing with billions of Indians minds but USA will never invest in India to make India next World factory because India is not major threat to American imperialism.....China and Vietnam are Communist countries and these nations people are very nationalists and Anti- America or American imperialism so American government is always trying to invest in China and Vietnam to divert these nations peoples minds.....But India has British slavery parliament democracy and not major threat to US imperialism.......wake up British slaves Indians now....

​@@SumitKumar-oi1bbyou are a foolish fellow summit his analysis taught me to learn things and have a neutral view..thank you shekhar sir..

0.3% deflation is still much better than 7% inflation in the United States. For example, Which do you think is more serious ？the 3% drop in food prices in China and the 70% increase in food prices in the US?

It appears reason for the deflation is boom has ended and bust has begun i.e low demand relatively.

@@stunstar4553 deflation is worse, you are thinking of it from a personal perspective. The wider economy gets shafted in a long term deflationary trend, look at Japan. Japan went from one of world's richest countries in late 80s, to below average in OECD.

@@stunstar4553economical deflation. Deflation means less profit for businesses. Because raw material prices are going up that means deflation eats up the profit of businesses. As businesses donot make profit they shutdown and this leads to loss of employment and that is a vicious economic cycle. Inflation on the other hand is opposite which means there is less supply for demand providing room for innovation. It depends also on where inflatory pressure and the state of development. A developing countries like China and India you need inflation at minimum of 2% and maximum of 5%.

@@anmolmonga1933 The average income of China is 3 to 5 times that of India, most products are already cheaper than Indian products, and prices are still decreasing. how do you think Chinese people's living conditions if compare to Indians?

Most other countries, esp. in Africa and South America, are fighting high inflation. I am not sure how they would be entertaining more inflationary projects like sovereign debt or infrastructure investments from China. This is a time when China could benefit from overseas investment, but unfortunately there won't be takers.

not sure how declining domestic and export demand will appreciate yuan. we saw a decline in the last week.

Every country has a different challanges. You can easily spot other people but for your self is hard. Alots of india media talking bad about china youth unemplyomemt but nobody talk about india youth unemplyment which is much worse then china

@@iggy5347 No, it's not worse than China and more importantly, India's existing unemployment is a passing shower, China's is a thunderstorm. Did you event watch the video? China's economy has been in a fall since it raised it ambitions from becoming more than a cheap labor manufacturing hub. India's has a much stronger base of diversified sectors, no over-reliance on Real-estate, a younger demography and most important of all, a democratic society.

@@kshitijshrey ooo really?? But ukraine aide saying india and china got low inteligent .so you guys asian are the same. White rules

A Negatively Charged Advertisement - Episodes start with a Negative, Angry and Frustrated Tone.

ನಿಮಗೂ ಹೃತ್ಪೂರ್ವಕ ಶುಭಾಶಯಗಳು, ಸಹೋದರ

Dear Elizabeth, Thank you for contributing to ThePrint. Glad to know that you enjoyed watching this episode of #CutTheClutter. We're sorry to hear that you were prompted with such a response. We assure you that there is no such prompt that comes on our website subscription. You may opt for an international subscription here: theprint.in/subscribe/

Source bro?

You might be working in the Indian Foreign Service or A Raw agent? What is your source? Most of the points are amazing but the 6th one was so outlandish that I really laughed after reading it. First of all, China is no Pakistan. They are the world's second biggest military power with the latest technologies. Second, Did you hear the statement made by our Foreign Minister? He clearly said that he is not a fool to start war with "Bigger Power" China. So this government can do things with Pakistan but not with China. Also it doesn't fit in der Hindu Muslim Narrative. Also, you cannot claim victory over China. Be realistic, you are talking about a deputy Super Power. And even if Russians are not winning war, they have almost destroyed half of Ukraine. We cannot afford war at this time. So my reason is different and it is not the cowardly reason used by our FM that we cannot fight with bigger power. But I agree with him that India should not go to war with China. We cannot afford it right now and not in the next 20 years.

Rebuttal to point 9 - tianmen square massacre

​@@BharatThatIsIndia6 th point is not far from possible if china attacks Taiwan western countries and usa forces India to act India chooses to attack in aksaichin

@@nishant7903 First of all China will not attack Taiwan. Secondly, Even if Western Countries will force India for a war with China, India will never do it. I don't like the Modi government and its politics but I don't think Modi Ji is naive to act under pressure from Western Countries and have a war with China. India depends on China for many things. India is not in a position to go to war with China. India will act in its own interest.

Also include how Shri Oommen Chandy's son did not give proper medical care to him and that he may become a saint soon.

🤣

I have been reading, hearing about the “coming” collapse of China for good 20 years, but I’m cautiously optimistic this time it is real.😅

I saw all your earlier videos. It is a "command" approach. So much, for "GreatChina". There are better approaches.

A bs bastardized religion

Democracy is a scam

But did we realise it? If you ask common Indians, we still like Indira Government work during emergencies or we like the autocratic rule of Modi ji. Even on state level, we like Vijayan, Stalin, Yogi, Kejariwal, Jagan, etc in comparison with Shivraj, Siddaramaiyaah, etc who are more democratic in der approach.

@@BharatThatIsIndia Autocratic rule, if that is what it actually is, is a good thing for India right now. Indian Demographics is not going to wait for Indian politics to sort itself out so that economic reforms, which are necessary but are politically unfavorable, can be pushed through. A lot of much required economic reforms were stalled because of a weak MMS govt. and the 'Suit-Boot ki sarkar' jibe (which stopped land reforms). Japan, South Korea, Taiwan were all military dictatorships when they grew at high rates. They turned into democracies as the growth slowed down. China and Vietnam are communist autocracies (what happens as the growth slows down is yet to be seen). Malaysia achieved high rate of growth under 22 years of rule by Mahathir. Singapore also grew under the unchallenged and autocratic rule of Lee Kaun Yew. People often ask, why can't we grow as fast as China? .. Why are we celebrating 7% growth when China could achieve double digit growth? I find those questions really stupid. We can't cause we can't do things like China can . We can't even execute a bullet train project timely. Why?.. Because land acquisition can't happen in Maharastra cause the under-serving Uddhav Thackeray wants to be CM. The fact is there is no democracy in this world which grew at very high economic rates which being a liberal democracy that you seem to yearn for (Not even the West). People who don't know history have a very ideological view of democracy with the belief the democracy is good for all situations and even a slightest decrease or perceived decrease in democratic workings of a govt. is the biggest cause for concern. People should stop considering all other factors and only lament the loss (not complete) of democracy.

@@BharatThatIsIndia US also becoming autocratic. Its a global trend actually.

@@arunsar7893 😂😂😂 India is full of people like you. There are many who still think the emergency were great. So I m not surprised. Your data is so flawed. Cambodia, Mayanmar, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Srilanka, etc were under dictatorial government. What is der situation? Japan has been a democracy since 1945 and I think after ww2, they grew under democracy only. The USA, France, Norway, etc all have democracy. They grew under that only. Now, the Modi government. Did you ever compare the growth data of the MMS government and the Modi government? Just check once. Indian economy size doubled in last decade. What about now? It is only 70%. Check the average growth rate too. So don't tell me that it is good for India to have a Dictatorial leader. Check employment, inflation. You can compare with worst UPA era of 2012-13 only. So Modi is competing with UPA worst era and der also he is not winning by much. Actually anyone who thinks that Dictatorial or Autocratic rule is good for India, they never used der brain and are most superfluous person. I don't think you are any different. Yes China has Grown understand dictatorial rule but just check under whose rule it started. Mao has destroyed China. Deng Xiaoping started the liberalisation and he succeeded. He also needed to give economic Freedom and then only China grew. I should not have even written this bcz one should not try to have an argument with a supporter of autocratic or Dictatorial government. Bcz if they have the argument, why will they have any problem with democracy in the first place.

#1 Is Communism name a Communist and dictatorship country doing good?

If you assume China will have 0 growth for the next 2 decades and they are overstating their GDP, it will take 20 years of 7% growth for India to catch up. If you assume China will have a low rate of 3% growth with persistent deflation it will take roughly 25-30 years for India to catch up to their economy. The point of this is not to lose hope, but just to keep in mind that catching up to China is a long journey and cannot be done overnight. China did not build its lead over India in a day. What India should focus on is learning from China's successes and failures. Remember that Deng Xiaoping built up China's economy and Xi is ruining it and look at their policies accordingly. On the foreign policy front Deng believed in "biding your time and hiding your strength" and developing positive relations with the West to attract FDI while Xi was in favor of economic self reliance, assuming that the Chinese market was so big that foreign companies would enter no matter what, and he had a very aggressive foreign policy stance. Deng favored less state control over the economy while Xi expanded the role of state companies. Deng focused on fundamental reforms like reducing bureaucracy, farming reform, land reform, and textile growth for jobs. Xi was mainly focused on high tech areas like semiconductors and expanding R&D. These are just some of the policy differences off the top of my head, but I am sure you can find more.

@@JohnSmith-vn8dm Thank you for your detailed comments. I really enjoyed reading through the policy comparison between Deng and Xi. Rationale over rhetoric is what I love about this channel. On an unrelated note, I think India's economy is big enough or is on a trajectory to be big enough to exert geo-political sway in most situations. As the pie grows, we will also do better on per capita. I think it's time to start working on the income/wealth inequality we have today to sustain and de-risk that growth. We have to be wary of concentration risk in the drivers for GDP.

@@JohnSmith-vn8dm Or i have even better suggestion. We cannot replicate China and no need to feel bad about it. They are a dictatorship, we are not. Indians should work hard to increase manufacturing, improve GDP per capita, quality of life and feel proud of ourselves, despite the disadvantages of democracy we have progressed. Constant comparison w China and inferiority complex should be avoided.

there was a Glodman Sachs projection which said that in another 50 years, US, China and India would all be around $51 trillion economy. Basically, US continues t grow at 2-3 percent, China too around that and India growing at 5-7 and eventually catching up with China and US

Lol. Have you seen our urban infrastructure? Even Africa is better than ours. China's 3% growth is much more than India's 6% growth in terms of numbers. China is going nowhere. They are part of the global supply chain

Pardon my ignorance, what does your statement mean?

​@@user-pd5ct6zo5mChinese bots in comments are known as 50 cent army.

@@ishowsports008 Tks

It's not about what u decide to talk about. But what people want to listen to! I may be wrong on this. As I was an ardent follower. But off-late have found u irrelevant to current/live topics......

In a political sense Deng was definitely dictatorial. Tiananmen happened under his watch. But in an economic sense he was more liberal, in favor of privatization and less state control, which is what fueled China's economy boom. He also put a lot of effort into understanding how the US thinks and sees itself, to better influence the country to maintain positive relations with them. He also focused on keeping good relations with middle powers like Japan and Russia.

@@JohnSmith-vn8dm He was a dictator who believed in economic liberalisation. He might become one bcz The Great Leap Forward by Mao was a complete disaster and Deng wanted to change that for his country. But He was a communist dictator sitting just below Mao and Xi. We should not have a doubt about that.

That's why we do not need socialist government of old days

CCP will continue funding khangress

😂😂