I was searching for this comment haha . I saw that too 🤣 He his a troll.

All of the 3 roaming helping standards implemented. Here you can enable them: 802.11r -> Security ft=yes, 802.11k -> Steering rrm=yes, 802.11v -> Steering wnm=yes,

Like the video says, you can run two capsman servers to serve both types of devices. For future features, we needed a new system, the past can’t hold us back

​@@mikrotikNew system is a good thing, but setting up and updating config on 2 controllers is a pain. If i need to add 3 new SSIDs, I now need to add a bunch of config on one and then recreate the same config, but in a different way on the other.

@@kharkin0 Moreover, in capsman wave2 access points now work only in local forward mode; for multissid you need to drag a separate vlan to each point.

Question or thought to MikroTik…. Optional wave2 package that can be ran in a container package on router OS 7 This would be great alternative for hybrid deployments or for organizations needing better “single pane of glass” view Otherwise need a dedicated routerOS device or setup ONE of the cAP AX access points as a master controller. But this creates a divide in management and a mess to manage. Have to logon different places to manage two places for config changes….

In dense environments new 802.1ax driver works much better in 2GHz even. Like the video says, interference is not much of a problem anymore with the new chips.

Of course it can connect to other APs. This is toggled by the mode parameter.

Of course it does :)

Perfect guess. Nice to see a fellow Doom connoisseur

LOL that was 1st I noticed

Modern chip drivers have such limitation, nothing we can do here

i can suggest you to use ESP32 or ESP8266 for this purpose.

Oh I see, thank you.

Hello, of course, I noticed that my 951 router works better (download 32mb /upload 14mb)only in connection with my Mibox S at a distance of about 10 meters behind the wall. While the L009-in router can send and receive under 1 megabit under the same conditions. Is it possible that the L009 router needs special settings for better performance?

I read this from a translator, but get the idea that "ROS7 bad, WIFIWave2 Bad"... I do not agree at all. ROS7 has been a fantastic shift to using more power made available with these new chipsets, and WIFIWave2... about bloody time. It's so different, but is soooo much better and faster. Keep up the good work Mikrotik Team.

@@zactodd3144 Thank you for your response. I agree with you that ROS7 has become more flexible in settings, but this flexibility has exceeded all imaginable limits. For example, why do I need RIP, BGB, MPLS in a home SOHO router, why do I need WiFi settings in a router without WiFi functionality, why do I need IPv6 if it is not available in our country? In ROS6, I had the ability to disable all unnecessary packages and it was great. In ROS7, I was deprived of this opportunity and the router interface was overloaded. In ROS7, many menu items have disappeared or been moved without any logic. As for the equipment, the company has also taken a strange path. What is this monster called RB5009 that the company released? It is embarrassing to put it on a desk and impossible to put it in a rack. It is purely marketing and not practical use. There are interesting devices that have been recently released, but mandatory use of ROS7 turns them into garbage. I am very disappointed in the company, their new policy and new developments. PS: I have been working with Mikrotik equipment since 2011.

Since 7.12beta7 we have added "station-bridge" mode, it can now be used with other WifiWave2 devices running in AP mode, to create a repeater - layer 2 bridge.

thats good, i bought 4 of them few weeks ago, and had to send them back, because this is the only feature i need. it`s poor to see that an cap lite (round about 30€) has this feature and a cap ax for 130€ doesnt have it....

so is it then also possible to use station bridge with the: HAP AX LITE???@@mikrotik