as with a lot of performance videos i make with few clips: this isn’t my best work, it’s fine, it looks good but it’s not in the S tier it’s solid A or B tier.
making this makes me understand the ze rose who really hated when the concept for this dropped and then the mv. for one hanbin DOES NOT fit with this concept at all. I don't think I've seen someone who doesn't fit the hard-edged concept less than him. and since he’s like the front man of that part of the chorus i totally understand. i’ve said since the beginning that they’re probably gonna do what the boyz does and so i wasn’t too concerned about the concept shift. Gunwook and Yujin totally do great with this concept and so does jiwoong to a lesser extent. Ricky does it maybe slightly less good than jiwoong but still pretty good. Matthew and Hao are kinda in the middle, could probably go either way but definitely work better with the bright concepts. Taerae is in the same boat as Hanbin but not nearly as bad. Gyuvin I'd also say works slightly better with the hard edged concepts but he’s also sorta in the middle with Hao and Matthew.
About Me
Name: Sam
Pronouns: they/them
Age: 22
Editing software: KineMaster
For thumbnails: PicsArt and Phonto
ult groups: seventeen, the boyz & dreamcatcher
ult biases: lee chan (svt), chanhee (tbz), seungcheol (svt), chenle (nct dream), kang daniel
my kpop playlist open.spotify.com/playlist/0Xj...
songs i’m currently obsessed with
open.spotify.com/playlist/7pD...
my bias list: docs.google.com/document/d/1A... (constantly being updated)
spodify open.spotify.com/user/22pe4t2... (may find sneak peaks for upcoming videos)
My tumblr / 21shotglasses
My twitter / 21shotglasses
Email: samskpopcorner@gmail.com
buy me a coffee
www.paypal.me/samthecelestial
I don't own any of the videos in this video, just the editing
Disclaimer: Following Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976: [T]he fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.
No infringement is intended.