EXACTLY... Thank Yu. Dang these peeps... LOL. Looks like what CNN would've loved to have produced in the Sand Box 90,91... n on .

The herky jerky movement and explosion overlay are childish.

As far as retirement, no, some of them are still flying and will continue to fly until 2034. This being said directly from the USAF.

@@speedfiend74 not in combat, they are only flying to test out new software and nothing more

@@bigboots6114 Yeah, I said that in a previous comment, reply to someone higher in the feed. But it has also been said by the USAF that the retired/parked F117s can easily return to a combat roll if the need arises.

Bro fr 😂 it's from a video game

Maybe that is why the Houthi’s have the old planes.

Says right in the video description its from Arma 3, a military simulation game on PC.

Actually they are still used for training and experimental. Trust me they are being used Maybe not for this type of engagement. But yea they are being used

This is a video game dude 😂🤦

Computer generated shit

😅

​@@TheNotpc1😅😅

simulator game

This aircraft is out of service years ago from what I have heard.

It is a movie , not real 😂

Figo

❤

Not really.

They just want you to believe it's retired

Not all have been "retired" and and the ones still flying are set to fly until 2034. I highly doubt they are being used in a combat capacity, let alone in Yemen, but who knows.

I think most are in storage but a few are still flying for "research purposes"...so they say.

Yeah, I thouht they were retired for many years, now , ,

they are still flying; they've recently been spotted flying around Nellis training F22 and F35 fighter pilots against adversarial stealth aircraft as aggressor aircraft. F22 and F35s flying against F-117s that are in place of the J-20 and Su-57. Also they use them for training in detecting cruise missiles since they hold similar radar cross sections.

Excuse me, but that Arma 3 mention needs to be in the video title, not buried in the description. Clickbait is when this kind of mention is not included in the video title. So, this video is clickbait. Also, putting it in the description doesn't insulate the video poster in any way against this. Also, also, this kind of video is stupid. I'm sick of seeing stupid, clickbait videos about Arma or DCS shit on KZfaq.

This is fake. It is from (DCS) Digital Combat Simulator. And it's old.

As stated in the hidden info of the video. LOL they probably should make that stand out more. *NOT Real footages, just Arma 3 gameplay simulation

What I really want to know, is why I read so many Americans, endlessly claiming the F-22 is so much better than the Russian SU-57 rubbish, that relies on washing machine, chip technology, and has the radar cross-section (RCS) of a Jumbo jet? Firstly, there is no possible way for anyone to know the RCS of any military aircraft, as they're always classified, so really what is that all about? But then, if you ask them what they've ever seen the F-22, actually do, that would allow them to hold that opinion? None of them can answer that, as they've never seen the F-22 do anything at all in the 19 years they've had it, (well, other than flying over a beach on a KZfaq Video). So, all they actually, and endlessly prove, is, their own opinions are all based on absolutely nothing at all, right?. So, really, what is it all about? And even worse, they never even ask the obvious questions? Questions like, how can the F-22 or F-35's (for that matter) detect, track, and target enemy stealth aircraft from BVR (beyond visual range)? The truth is, they have no idea at all, man! LOL. Yet, if they had just asked themselves that one question?, they'd maybe start to understand, that today's reality, is nothing at all like they think! But seemingly they just don't know, or understand, that stealth alone defeats high-frequency (short wave), radar, by absorption and deflection, but it does not defeat low-frequency (long wave radar). So regardless of the aircraft's RCS (they all believe means so much), when they're being detected, tracked and targetted by long wave radar, they're far from stealthy, and they just light up, and stand out, like a beacon in the night. To detect, track, and target enemy stealth aircraft from BVR, can be done with long-wave radar, (but it must also be enhanced), to remove all background clutter for targeting purposes. Yet neither the APG-77 radar in the F-22, or the APG-81 radar in the F-35, have any kind of long wave radar, (hence, they can't detect enemy stealth aircraft from BVR)! This is a fact, the US air force must be fully aware of. Only it seems the reality is, when the F-35 radars were being designed 13 years ago, there weren't any other stealth aircraft to think about as a potential threat! So, just what do the F-22 or the F-35, actually have available to them to detect enemy stealth aircraft from BVR? They have AWACS, (that can transfer all targetting data to the F-22 - F-35's in real time). Only, that's not possible today. And this is why actually understanding your enemies real abilities, becomes extremely important, critical in fact. Because, on the other hand, this (Russian rubbish), they all claim, is equipped with a 5th generation radar, (with enhanced long-wave radar), their new Byelka (2band) radar used in SU-57. They can detect, track, and target enemy stealth jets from BVR, and very easily today. Russia has designed, and developed, the first L-Band fighter radar we've ever seen. They've embedded L-band AESA radars into the leading edges of the wings. The L-band AESA radar "data" gets processed in real time (through extremely powerful Russian computers), being significantly enhanced, removing all background clutter, seeing them perfectly able to detect, track, and engage enemy stealth aircraft from BVR. This new Russian radar technology, along with its very impressive range parameters, and it's jamming ability (over very large areas) make this aircraft deadly to all other aircraft types. (But according to the Americans), it's just Russian rubbish, right?. They can also detect, track, and target enemy stealth fighters, long before they enter Russian airspace, (from much greater distances today), with "real-time" data from all those massive Russian ground (long wave stations), that are all protected with the networked S-400 defensive system. Russia's new (2band) radar, covers all frequencies across all channels, used for tracking, targeting, and also for jamming (over large areas). It's part of Sh121 multifunctional integrated radio electronic system (MIRES) on board the SU-57. We should also understand, that Russia tested this new radar suit in the SU-35's, so they also have the option of fitting this radar into the SU-35's. Seeing the SU-35 at no disadvantage against either the F-22/35. As although the SU-35 can be detected, tracked, targeted and shot down from BVR by the US stealth fighters, the SU-35 equipped with this new radar is just as able to detect, track, target and shoot down the US stealth fighters from BVR. Seeing the all-important, huge Russian advantage, in BVR missile range, plus the excellent manoeuvring, neither the F-22/F-35 have, as more than critical, (if you're going to avoid simply being blown out of the sky). The truth is, this new Russian 5th generation radar design, has very clear potentials, to provide genuine shared multifunction apertures, with applications including... Search, track, and destroy, missile mid-course guidance, against low signature aircraft, identification of friend or foe with secondary surveillance radar. Passive angle tracking and geolocation of JTIDS-MIDS-Link-16 emitters at long ranges. Passive angle tracking and geolocation of L-band AEWC - AWACS and surface based search radars at long ranges. Passive angle tracking and geolocation of hostile (i.e. Western) IFF and SSR transponders at long ranges. High-powered active jamming of JTIDS-MIDS-Link-16 emitters. High-powered active jamming of satellite navigation receivers over large areas. High-powered active jamming of L-band AEWC-AWACS and surface based search radars at long ranges. High-powered active jamming of guided munition command data links over large areas. [Effectively, and completely, neutralizing the USA's use of AWACS for their detection]. The Tikhomirov NIIP L-band AESA radar, is an extremely important strategic development, and it's a technology which once fully matured and deployed in useful numbers, will render narrowband stealth designs like the F-22 & F-35 Joint Strike Fighter, and many, UAVs, as highly vulnerable to all flanker variants equipped with such radars. So why do we endlessly hear and read such backward, outright stupidity?

When we really do take a step back, and actually do analyse the USA's real military capabilities, today? It's a horror story for the Yanks, in all honesty. Over these last 25 years, you've been out thought (across the board), you've been significantly out-built, and technically beaten, hands down, by both Russia, and China, (who are banging out modern hi-tech, hi-quality, military hardware in all areas of their military today). Even though much is largely defensive, it's also tactically offensive, and being done with a very focused and real analytic understanding of where they need to be at various stages of their military advancement. And although we actually know very little in truth, what they've allowed us to see, there's not anything I could single out, and start to criticize, even if I wanted too. So far everything has been completely logical. A great question that really points out today's military power realities, is, "what does the USA lead the world in today, concerning anything military"? And the answer to that question is, absolutely nothing! For example... In today's world of hi-tech, Anti-Ship ballistic missiles, like the Chinese DF-21D - operational range (1700 km's) that can sink any carrier in the world with a single hit, really means, all Navy's, including the USA's, without the ability to stop these missiles, are in effect, obsolete today. Russia's Zircon Anti-Ship missile, though inferior in way of operational range - 400kms. It can be fired from Aircraft, Subs, and Ships, making it deadly to any carrier in the world. (Russia also have the Brahmos and the P-800 Oniks, Anti-Ship missiles). We all know the US hasn't got a destroyer, or any other means, that can defend against these modern hi tech ASM's today! Seeing, the USA's Navy as pretty much obsolete in today's world. We only need to look how far the US jets can travel, it's approx, about 500-650 (max) km's out - and the same back again = 1300 km's range. Seeing the US unable to deploy any carrier close enough, to reach any inland target, and then get back again. Anywhere inside 1700 km's, they're sunk, they're toast, they're history. This is also why when we hear the USA "trumpeting out" how they're sending a carrier to the South China Sea, (as some kind of imagined "propaganda threat" toward China), then when looking at the US carrier's GPS positioning in the SCS, you'll never see them closer than 2000 km's from Chinas mainland! LOL, it's more commonly known as "bluster". Then when looking at another of the most important areas of militaries, today?, (Electronic Warfare), we again find the Russians are literally decades ahead. Russia have the GaN MMICs, the krasukha, the murmansk-BN, and Magrav technology (NATO: Khibiny) developed by Iranian-born nuclear engineer Mehran Keshe (called “a modern-day Nikola Tesla”). And we can say for sure, this EW hardware is super impressive, as we've no answer to it, and we've also seen this E/W in action on at least 4 occasions we know of... (Obviously claims denied by the USA), only if untrue? Then I'm just left asking why it was, that we saw the response, we saw, from the USA, basically confirming these events? 1) In 2013, we've seen a Russian SU-24 fly repeatedly around and directly over the USS Cook, leaving the Cook helpless to defend itself. 2) In 2014, we've seen a Russian SU-24 (flying at an altitude of only 10 feet), fly directly at, and straight over the USS Ross, eleven times, with the Ross completely unable to prevent It or respond to It. 3) As Russian forces arrived In Syria in 2015 we had many reports of US/NATO/Israeli Radar becoming scrambled, leaving them unable to communicate, or offer any response to the Russian forces. As one report said, the silence from the West was deafening! 4) In March 2015, a further related report notes. Federation submarine naval forces attacked with their advanced electronic defensive weapons the American aircraft carrier USS Theodore Roosevelt (CVN-71) causing it to turn and struggle to the coast of Britain to the amazement of the public. Where she remained for 9 days undergoing Intensive major re-wiring. It's believed the Russian electronic warfare pods (NATO: Khibiny) were used in a Russian trial of this technology for its submarine fleets. White House spokesman Josh Earnest, who said of the encounter with the Cook... "This incident is entirely inconsistent with the professional norms of militaries operating in close proximity with each other in international waters. E/C measures taken by the Russian Federation are unacceptable". To which the Russian MoD replied... "Frankly speaking, [we] do not understand the reason for such a painful reaction of our American colleagues, as the principle of freedom of navigation for the US destroyer, (which is staying in close proximity to a Russian naval base in the Baltic Sea), does [not] at all cancel the principle of freedom of flight for Russian aircraft testing Russian defensive systems". A further Ministry of Defence (MoD) report also stated that for the second time in two years, advanced Federation “electronic warfare defences” have crippled the Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Donald Cook (DDG-75)- It was noted when Baltic Fleet “special forces elements” offered assistance to tow the destroyer back to their Polish port, the Americans refused to respond. According to this report, in April 2014, the USS Donald Cook, while performing a mission in the Black Sea, substantially violated Federation “territorial integrity” causing President Putin to authorize an “electronic warfare defence” attack against it, that was so devastating this top-line warship was left adrift-and once towed back to its Romanian port, its American sailors were so demoralized 27 of them filed immediate letters of resignation from the US Navy. One year later, in May 2015, this report continues, and again in the Black Sea, the Arleigh Burke-class guided-missile destroyer USS Ross (DDG-71) substantially violated Federation “territorial integrity” causing President Putin, to once again, authorize an “electronic warfare defence” attack against it. But when confronted with the fate that befell the USS Donald Cook the year prior, it retreated-causing one Russian top-level Naval Officer to state: "It seems that the Americans did not forget the April 2014 USS Donald Cook incident - A Federation SU-24 equipped with EW pods shut down the new American destroyer". This attack encounter of Federation forces with the USS Donald Cook, this report details, began when this American warship began an “aggressive combat manoeuvre” against the Baltic Sea Fleet port in Kaliningrad, to which President Putin authorized an immediate “electronic warfare defence” against it. Then, another of the most important areas of these militaries today, (Ground Warfare)? We find that Russian troops with reserves, outnumber the USA, and we must also understand, that any attack on Russia, would immediately see China join the conflict, then outnumbering the USA in the millions today. But, also, more to the point, what have we ever seen from any US troops, that could make anyone believe or think, they'd be any sort of threat or match, for any of these well-disciplined, well-trained, Russian troops, who are all fully bled, and are prepared to stand and fight for their country's freedom, (seeing them fighting for all the right reasons). - While the US troops, would only be fighting for attempted US tyranny. All throughout the history of wars, we always find that all those fighting for the right reasons, (like their own freedom), have never lost, and they've always been the victors, while on the other hand, all those who fought for all the wrong reasons, like global control/tyranny, have all, not only lost, but all have been annihilated. These Yanks, would all be very wise to understand this, as we see this in every war, over and over again, nothing will change this time, only the annihilation might be much more severe, but it must also be recognized, and said, just as deserved! Then, when looking at today's (Missile World)? We find that once again Russia easily rules the missile world, today. Russia's modern hi-tech missiles, that include hypersonic missiles, (with Russian GLONASS, GPS targeting systems), give Russia such incredible precision, the USA has nothing we can even say, compares. And as we've all witnessed, Russia was pinpoint accurate, targeting single buildings in Syria, even seen guiding their missiles straight down chimney pots, or straight in through the front doors, and doing so from the Caspian Sea from distances of, up to 6500 km away. Russia has also provided clear, precise footage, of all her long range missile attacks in Syria, (that we can see all came from the Russian control room online). Russian hypersonic missiles?, we all know the USA can't defend against, and Russia has many other lethal hypersonic missiles being created and added to her arsenal. Personally, in any upcoming war? I give the USA precisely zero chance, none, not even a little snippet of a chance, annihilation is all they'll get. And again, 100% deservedly so.

If the US dared to take it Nuclear? We know, (and we know without any doubt at all), that Russia does have the ability to easily bring down all the USA's ICBM's, we also know the USA has no defence against even the much older Soviet ICBM's. - Let alone the modern lethal ICBM's like (Sarmat), a manoeuvrable long range ICBM that doesn't need to follow a ballistic path, carrying up to 24 MERVS, over speeds of Mach 20.7; 4.3 miles per second; 15,480 miles per hour. Also, because we saw the USA under Trump, really foolishly, pull out of the nuclear arms treaty, (that prohibited the creation of any short-mid range nuclear weapons), now sees even the old defensive threat of "MAD", as an obsolete defensive threat today. How insane was that, really? LOL. Russia has created those short-mid range missiles, and they've done so creating, hypersonic mid-range missiles, able to carry nuclear tipped warheads, or full nuclear warheads, travelling at speeds we've not seen before. Today's reality, really is very clear, right at this time, as we speak, the USA is just incredibly lucky that Russian nuclear policy doesn't threaten pre-emptive strikes, but is only a defensive nuclear policy. If the USA had done any of what they are today, in the times of the USSR for example, a nuclear war would have already taken place. - But now that Russia has unveiled what the USA is trying to do, and after hearing the USA, bizarrely, basically admitting what they're trying to do?. It will see Russia, soon change their defensive nuclear posture, to a pre-emptive nuclear posture, and honestly, who could blame them?. Because (as Russia is very aware), reality always trumps everything else, and today's reality, is, they'd be able to strike and hit all US defensive stations and their platforms, along with all US nuclear silos, destroying them all within minutes, long before the US could even begin to think about any sort of retaliatory launch. And even more reality is, that any launch from the USA today, would be pretty much meaningless. As today, Russia also has the S-500 (anti-ballistic missile defence systems), and the S-550 that's able to operate alongside Russia's new A-235 anti-ballistic missile system, with the ability to shoot down hypersonic attack weapons, hypersonic orbital platforms, ballistic missiles, and their combat units, as well as satellites in near space. And again, we know this is not just "Russian propaganda", (it never is), as we've all seen and watched Russia do exactly this, and they did so, so damn easily too. ICBM's of the USA, can be detected, tracked and shot down quite easily by Russia today. Any Nuclear effort from the USA, today?, would see them lose, and they'd lose big time, massively, annihilation is the only apt word. Yet we read you all with simply no idea about any of this, none, not a clue, man! It is clear to us that we have to defend our interests, and to do so consistently, not boorishly or rudely, in both the sphere of the economy and of defence. The pressure will only end when the USA will be “persuaded” that the methods they are using are ineffective, counterproductive, and harmful to all ~ Vladimir Putin, 2014. It never fails to amaze me the way our partners the US, (as we say in Russia) Stand on the same rake twice.~ Vladimir Putin, 2016. The United States must “Rise above their endless desire to dominate” ~ Vladimir Putin, 2018. For the first time in all the history of nuclear weaponry, including the Soviet period, we aren’t playing catch-up with anyone. Other states have yet to create the weapons that Russia already has, ~ Vladimir Putin, 2020. Talk about NOT taking the hint? LOL. Oh well, suicide is painless...

You came back from Vietnam in 1986? Tourist class?

@@williame.pittman7225 yes sir, top secret, like mission "vacation"

😂😂LMAO

Jajaja

​@@juvenalmardones1925 it actually is a game 🤣

날아간 돈만 5조원이다,후티반군이그렇게 돈 많아? 게임 잘 봤다~

😅ü​@@juvenalmardones1925

yes ​@@Leejesuk

Read up: *NO filmaciones reales, solo simulación de juego de Arma 3.

​@oceanman1340 no the F117 was very slow......and defenseless.......couldnt even hit Mach 1......only did 684 mph.....

@@oceanman1340 LOL Not maneuverable at all and very slow. Stealth was its only defense.

🤔🤔🤔 i think so too🤔🤔 Why? I'll explain why, because the US Democrats themselves founded the Islamic regime in Iran and they are still protecting it. That's why they carry out attacks on Iranian logistics but always in such a way that they continue to retain their power.

Islamic Republic Iran and There Mullahs are Made in US. Democrats and England

Tu est bete ou tu parle serieux c est Playstation 5

F−117は、退役しているのでは?

The F-117 has been retired for years.

Si fuera real los otros pilotos de los aviones que estaban por despegar se bajan del avión y corren o hubieran intentando despegar para contra atacar y solo se quedan parados

Se ve como solo un nieto de tiro al blanco y nadie corre ni se ve ningún soldado...

You sure it isn't DCS? Even ARMA 111 does not have this kind of flight sim.

@@GeneralPadron it says it in the video description.

이거 실제 아닌거 알죠!!!

نعم انه ليس حقيقي​@@user-hx4kc1gh9y

باید منتظر ضربه تلافی باشیم فکر میکنم چنان ضربه‌ای بزنند که نفهمند از کجا خورده‌اند😂

hhhh stuped

너 바보냐?

😮😢😮ن