Yes! I have already started calling it COCKTech 🤣

cuck tech is certainly a name

@@bloodybarron 🤣🤣🤣

Haha

Definitely a sponsored video

@@Lovelycinthy most of the tech reviews of this type of unknown brands are sponsored review

Yes and It's flagged as such!

Yes and It's flagged as such!

Yes impressive 55% in 15 minutes and fully charged still great at 35-40 minutes.

Thanks for watching!

Yes surprised to see.ir written on the side of it most hide this figure

Oh you mean the caps lock Cuktech? They wanted it written like this not sure why. Yes great battery bank it will pushes that wattage and only slows when the devices themselves will slow in charge like for example nearing full charge it turns into a trickle charge. But it's an impressive battery and replaced my others.

Ah yes Hypercharge works, 120/90W Xiaomi Turbo Charge, Vivo Flash Charge and Samsung Supercharge 2.0. All of the charging mods seem to work and 100W with my Legion Go. My anker ones don't support half of them!

@@Techtablets I meant the "h" at the end instead of the "k". Cuktech instead of Cukteck.

@@Techtablets Vivo Flash Charge and Samsung Super Fast Charge are both using PPS and since this Powerbank has a great PPS range up to 60W, it will charge the Samsung with full 45W and the Vivo up to 60W. I tested it myself using an USB-C tester like the Power-Z. Awesome stuff!

@@NachtfalkeSC Oh whoops thanks fixed that!

Thanks for the lesson!

​@@Techtablets no problem mate Btw it's pronounced as "cuck" not "cook" 😅

@@mokisan Akshually... it's pronounced as 'chook'

Yes that's good they don't hide it and yes they have other larger versions.

I agree, the "real" capacity is even better tho! I drained the battery with my tools at a constant 20V/5A 100W and got 30,7Wh or 8317mah - that's 83%! At 20/3A it got even better with 32,1Wh.

That is very decent.

Let me tell you something all power banks do have a different "rated" and "typical" capacity rating, that's normal.

@@4AMEW 100%.... But despite the speed, that's barely enough to fill a modem phone once.

There is a similar word for poo in Spanish 😂

It has impressive... loads.

@@Jefe_Perro 🤣

The old quick charge ones? Yes the QC 3.0 I think it was Xiaomi ones were good back in the day, I gave those away years ago.

Same it has replaced my Anker that does 30W max. It's been really good, thanks for the comment as a user!

cukteck/zmi is the oem for xiaomi chargers, afaik

@@4zims Yes they were building for them with the Xiaomi ecosystem or still do?

​@@Techtablets no idea how it works

I think they have gone out on their own now and not making stuff for Xiaomi. At least not these battery banks anymore.

Haha 😂

Looks like I did yes. The rate will vary also depending on the device and the screen rate can be shwo a delay but the main thing is the tech itself doesn't show it stopping fast charging.

40 mins sorry I thought it was in the video.

I'm going to buy the bigger one myself but this small size is good for trips but the high capacity would come in more handy for me.

😅 True they keep getting smaller

Shrinkflation :/

Thanks for watching!

I believe it does but don't have a Huawei phone on hand to test it.

@@Techtablets I'm asking because HUAWEI devices can be very picky with charging.

I hope they will send me it but not sure.

It is a bit odd, but one thing is sure you don't forget it.

four 2170 cells at 10000mah is weird. that's like 2500mah for each 2170 cell which I have never seen before. But yeah, I don't need the speed on a powerbank. 10000mah is just about the sweet spot for me for device size vs capacity and cost. I could buy a reputable brand 2170 4000mah cell for $2 each and $0.19 for the cheapest USB-C charger or $1.2 for a board with USB-A and micro usb ports.

​@@zodiacfmlI was thinking the same thing (btw, I'm the same dude that's written the original comment, just from a different account). 2500 mAh is a very strange capacity. There are three possible scenarios: 1. There might be a 21700 cell with just 2500mAh capacity that we don't know of. (I am sceptical... ) 2. They are using higher capacity cells, but take into account the conversion loss (efficiency) and tell us the final capacity. (If there were 5 cells inside, I would say "no way", but with 4 cells, you need to step up from 16.8 or even 12V up to 20V. Stepping up such a difference and at this high of a current is very inefficient. So they might just did that. If this scenario is true, I believe they just used some 3000mAh Samsung cells capable of 5A charging and 30A discharging. 3. 90W of charging is a bit much... It's 22.5W per cell. From a very quick search yesterday, I found that Samsung cell that could do 5A charging and noted in the specs "not for longevity". So they just state a smaller capacity and don't charge/discharge the cells 0-100%, but rather 5-95% in order to somehow keep them running... I personally think is a combination of scenario 2 and 3. Most powerbanks on the market (from any brand) are 80-85% efficient. A 15-20% loss is always expected. However, since they need such a big boost in voltage, their efficiency is way lower than that... They are 75-80% efficient... The goal is to match other power banks of similar capacity, so a 4*3000mAh (12000mah) powerbank with 75-80% efficiency matches a 10000mAh one with better efficiency. All in all, if all this speculation is true, this powerbank isn't a quality product. Yes, it's small, yes it charges fast, but what about longevity? That Samsung cell claims to be able to fast charge at 5A (with stated reduced longevity). What's the nomimal charging current? 0.5C 😅 1.5A is the nomimal... Manufacturing companies do indeed manufacture new cells capable of charging a bit faster, but they also take into account the use cases these cells will mainly be used for. Such as power tool batteries which are really heavily used... With that in mind, they just put these cells in their absolute extremes. They just state a charging current that the cell is actually not comfortable with, but still safe to do so at the expense of longevity. Normal high capacity 21700 cells can charge faster than the recommended 0.4C. But the manufacturer knows that the use case on these are application where fast individual cell charging isn't as necessary as longevity, so they just don't give us a fast charging current. I have charged 18650 cells at +25% current than the max recommended. They didn't get hot, but I know they are ageing a bit faster... Lastly, I'd like to also confirm that someone can get 21700 cells for less than 2€ a piece. For about 1.9€ per cell I'd say, I can get the LG M50LT cell which is really great, but not for 5A charging 🤣 BUT! You can put 10 of these cells in a 5S2P (5 series 2 parallel) configuration and you get yourself a 18V (21V when charged, 15V when discharged) 10Ah pack. This is the 50.000mAh powerbank I was talking about. It has a 0.4C recommend max charging current which is just 2A per cell, but we can kind of stretch it a bit and say that 2.4A is still safe (+20%). It really is... 2.4A*10 cells * 4.2V= 100W. And that's what we should be aiming for. I sincerely believe that these LG cells charging at 2.4A will last way longer thay those others charging at 5A... And they are rated for 1000cycles... And since it's a 5S configuration, you have less losses than the other 4S one... I actually don't like cheap 21700 enclosures... I like PD capabilities and I like 100W of it... There are so many use cases for this kind of power... the power bank becomes a tool for so much more than just charging your phone... You can charge your laptop, you can use it to power a solder, you can power a DC video projector, you can power a modem/router during a power outage and still have internet access. With a boost converter you can even charge you e-bike or e-scooter in a pinch. PD capabilities are very useful... Anyways, I stop my long comment here. And I pretty much agree with yours 😉

That's what she said!

Not amazing but you do remember it at least.

Cuckedteck

Max power output is 150W of both ports combined but you're talking about duration of at that rate. Of course it's limited but most people normally charge a phone at say 45W or 90W etc and it can do this once for most phones. For example with my legion go I got about 40% charge and this was around 1 hour runtime but it's not able to fully charge it of course.

It depends on the use case. It can fully charge my Xiaomi phone in that time frame.

Going backwards like Adsense rates are. Unfortunately I will and have to take on a few of these sponsored videos now and then but nothing like the channels that only do paid videos and nothing that isn't sponsored.

without doing paid reviews, how can a channel survive?

@@Lovelycinthy Getting paid in a free battery pack is hardly making a living. This is what a person does when they first get their first sponsor. It is not something a KZfaqr who has been doing this for years would lower himself to do.