@@DdraigGoch84 His point being confict of interest. Is that not apparent? Or are you just being obfuscating.

A basic communist is a useful idiot , they all ended up in the gulag , Wall street finance communism and fascism to divide nations , the banks lay out the third way , international courts and international banking ,use aftermath of nazism to discredit nationalism and the aftermath of communism to discredit traditionalism -socialism ,

Tychoxi ad hominem

@@juanmaguijo1106 If you can't put up a compelling counter-argument, this is what people resort to.

@@salflp01 Well I know narcissist would say: @6:10 "even though they are exploited and oppressed by the system (no evidence) actually seek to often defend it, despite being in their own interests" (Ironically capitalism is all about ones own interest.) The implication being that we have to "fix" your thinking. Hench education. Or re-education camps. The Bernie supporters on the project veratas video praised gulags, re-educating people and killing them otherwise. The fallacy being, if you think humans are that stupid. What in the world makes you think you are exempt from being completely wrong? It's ghastly that this is the same rhetoric the grooming gangs were telling 12 year old rape victims. You are doing so much wrong, you just don't realize it. We'll forcibly convince you because you are too dumb to realize it. And you wonder why people see you as villains?

@Brett L - why?

@@sirellyn4391 What

Or even read any wikipedia entries.

Or history.

Or a book

It's not his fault. He doesn't understand how to place people of history on a timeline because of ... ... wait for it .... cultural Marxism.

In the scheme of things few people have, even among economist's. Is this any wonder, three massive volumes that took Marks about 20 years to research/write?

Well, the Dixiecrats turned on him right quick once he started signing ci8il rights bills and they became the Republi8can party as we know it today.

CORRECT!

btf yeah heard of the switching of the bases

@@cassiedevereaux-smith3890 I am not sure if you are claiming that the parties switched or that they booted him out. However, if you are claiming that the parties switched then that is incorrect out of all of the Dixiecrat's only 3 joined the Republican party the rest stayed in the Democrats.

Umut yigit Lol, all you have to do is understand the meaning of the word “republican” to understand that the parties switched

As an actual marxist speaking, this is not marxism. None of these people have read theory or know what it actually is. Also, the "cultural marxism" type term actually originated in the Nazi party as anti-semitic propeganda due to Karl Marx being of Jewish ancestry.

@@claude2571 basically " it wasn't the real communism" all over again 😂🤣😂

@@claude2571 rope

@@Kajojek you laugh, but that's what Orwell's 1984 was about; Fascists pretending to be socialists (the populism of the time), in order to gain power, and destroy socialism, according to 'The Theory and Practice of Oligarchical Collectivism'

That is often a point that bleeds from BBC programming... I mean this is literally something Frankie Boyle has said.

@@Notallowed101 Yes, a comedy show. Compare with the main right-wing programming, from enthusiastic free marketeers to presenters that don't even need to invite Conservatives to bash their (occasional) left-wing guests.

@@tobymcinnis7031 In that case, then I suppose capitalism is not _making_ us hate ourselves in that situation but a further comtinued incarnation of our flawed systems that we need to overcome

@@leeturnbull2082 What are you trying to imply with "Speak for yourself," are you legit blaming a single person for destroying the climate

Actually this is a good summary what the critic of political economy is all about and what Smith, Mill and Ricardo didn't see or didn't want to see in their analysis of capitalism.... But the main Thinker of liberalism was and is Mandeville which one also should name

LOL :))))) FOX and FACTS

Look up 'Body popping Hitler' for more

Sounds like a left wing version of Back to the Future.

@@Nine-Signs I still believe the origin of Hitler's "degenerate art" came from a place of resentment and bitterness over his own art, traditionalist and thoroughly dull as it was. The uninspired nature of his paintings precluded him from entering the Academy of Fine Arts in Vienna, after all. Pretty interesting to read up on Hitler's thoughts on artistic orthodoxy. He dedicated a chapter in Mein Kampf to it, so it obviously wasn't just a footnote for him.

@The Glorious Revolution It is a definition, yes. I never claimed that there never was a definition. I claimed that there is no definition that everyone can agree upon. I'd expand on that by saying that the factual basis of the idea can be fundamentally called into question as a result of this. You'd think a global conspiracy would have contiguous markers by which to identify it. You claim it represents a plot to spread institutional criticisms of capitalism. Pat Buchanan claims it's a plot to eradicate white identity. Anders Behring Breivik used the idea to justify what he went on to do, citing a cultural decay that facilitates "Islamic colonialism". Paul Weyrich equated it to political correctness, and implied that it relied on social stigmas and offensive content to propagate itself. Is your definition one that would be universally agreed upon if you were to present it to a group of people who believe in the concept of cultural Marxism? Would you dispute that, rather than being a singular, contiguous theory, cultural Marxism is just an aggregate of perceived antagonisms towards the right-wing?

@The Glorious Revolution That's a poor definition, it doesn't at all address the wide use of the term in response to opposition to racism, sexism etc. What you're describing is just left wing propaganda.

Aaron Bastani is wrong! If Cultural Marxism doesnt exist then why does the University of California at Los Angeles have a course on the subject by Douglas Kellner with a downloadable PDF document called "Cultural Marxism and Cultural Studies?" That is really weird dont you think? Maybe you can email the professor and tell him he doesnt know what he is talking about. Even though the professor himself is a Marxist. Also why did Richard Weiner Professor of Political Science write a book on cultural Marxism called "Cultural Marxism and Political Sociology?" Also why does Marc Tuters from the University of Amsterdam have a academic journal article on the subject. Also why does Jerome Jamin from the University of Liege have an academic journal article called "Cultural Marxism: A Survey?"

@@reapthewhirlwind2114 you should look into the Thule Society

Check him now it's all crypto-Nazi occult nonsense. KZfaq is undermining his guitar teaching income obviously.

Sort of reinforces the meme that thinking in terms of cultural Marxism can lead you down a certain path to a subversion theory that works very similarly.

Do you have evidence for crypto-nazism? Last time I checked he has became so sceptic, that he questions evolution and began to believe in god again.

@@ivan55599 yeah, that goes hand in hand

An effeminate Anglian riot .

Good point. & what *is* it they are asking you to do?

@@JakobMusick dissolve the perceived current cultural hegemony and replace it with their own hegemony.

@@ennieminee4470 xD yeah basically, but also if you are simple minded “equality for all = good”.

@@ericjoshua_ Is equality for all not a worthy goal? The way in which we reach that objective is up for debate. But if the objective isn't equality of opportunity for all, what is it?

@@Hindsighht Lol, you are exactly what Nietzsche warned against: setting the ideal as having the common good for all, i.e equality for everyone. Unfortunately, that is impossible, to use Nietzsche's common term to describe it "unnatural" and the main objective is governed by will to power. I am not denying the utility of such a goal, but it is a partial utility because the truth of the matter is, we cannot get rid of inequality; some people are "strong" and some are "weak". Equality of opportunity from the get-go is impossible to obtain--though we have to pretend it exists! Newly-born children would soon recognize that there are varying degrees of wealth, conditions of a country, their own biological capability, etc that ultimately crush the notion of equality of opportunity. In essence, equality is a wet-dream in the face of the reality of nature--that of inequality. I believe Nietzsche has made this sufficiently clear: there exists a hierarchy that necessitates inequality but of course, the strong would say "no we are for equality of opportunity" because in the end, they would benefit the most out of it and crush the weak. I am for equality or for the common good--the social contract--because I will benefit most from it; that is, I am of the strong, for example.

BUT NOT ME, I AM A CHRISTIAN, FOOL! YOU WILL NEVER DEFEAT THE TOLSTOY GANG!

norsk?

looool so true

@f8ckutub Talk to yourself much?

Yes, so it can be debunked and ridiculed properly for the nonsense that it is.

Any news when this might happen? It's been nearly 3 years.

This is why he isn't on Question Time. But that was excellent.

Really activates the almonds

So no factual arguments?

@@smithmiddleton8893 About what?

@@pannik_lucas Resorting to weak analogy in favour of any sort of evidence for the claim being made

​@@smithmiddleton8893It's not like the use of such analogies is forbidden in these subjects

Me too. Marxist since 1987? Amazing!

@yazzzzminable It would be funny if it weren't so bloody dangerous. We need to fight those psychos!

@@regvarney5582 Disappointing of you.

Are you dumb? You clearly haven't look into the history of the Frankfurt School. It is an objective fact that Marxists moved from Europe to the USA (Frankfurt School) to alternate economic Marxism into culturally Marxism.

Yeah, we have people in the UK being locked up for saying racist things. Complete nonsense!

Premodern protomarxist I think

That would make you a *cultured* Marxist

That makes you James Butler.

...or in the case of Canada, "eh holes", lol

As an Australian, I completely understand and agree. I take no responsibility for Rupert Murdoch who- to be fair, has caused far more damage than Goldie, Molyneux and Peterson combined ever could. But I’m still sorry.

Canada created Rush, Neil Young and Joni Mitchell. Australia gave us ACDC, Barry Humphries and Olivia Newton John! You both get a pass 😃

SpuddySpud Barry Humphries is a transphobe (which is perhaps ironic). I will however accept The Angels, Cold Chisel, the Hemsworths, Hugh Jackman, Cate Blanchett, Nick Cave and the Bad Seeds, Sia, or Silverchair (though just the earlier stuff) in that spot. 😂 but actually, that did make me better- to know that although we’ve contributed quite possibly the most powerful evil media mogul in the world, we’ve made up for it with a LOT of talent in other areas (we’ve also invented a whole heap of stuff, apparently). I’m sure Canada is the same- I appreciate Ryan Reynolds, Alanis Morrissette, KD Lang, and Nathan Fillion. So thanks, Canada!

@@katherinemorelle7115 I didn't know Barry Humphries was a transphobe!

I see what you did there, and I approve.

Well done! Best joke in ages!!!

lool i skipped to those bits in the video to see if the audio was fucked , jesus im retarted.

Best comment so far!

I had exactly the same problem.

I love you, nobody else understands my argument that "culturalmaxist" scaremongery supposes they've got a timemachine. PS Time Machines can't go back in time - so Petetsons basic ideas refuted 😁

Far right? Jesus.

Seriously?

It is a thing alright but it is nothing to do with Marx, it is a rightwing conspiracy theory picked up on by morons

I'm a Marxist but I don't know what the Cultural Marxists stated goals are. Where are they stated by Cultural Marxists themselves ?

@@julianshepherd2038 look at south korea and north korea wich one succseed

The video seems well argued to me. If you want to be a 'red scare' fanatic then go ahead, you'll only make yourself look clueless.

no loss.

Have you even read Marx?

Wait WHAT

@@NikoHL Someone LITERALLY did. THAT'S why I included a timestamp.

No institutional racism is the institution being racist cultural Marxism is referred to literally anything progressive

@@Plasmagone distinction to be drawn between "progressive" and "regressive", the two are often synonomous

@@K_-_-_-_K as in wanting change and not wanting to stay the way we currently are

@Music Case Unfortunately, you don't get to dictate to everyone what is real and what isn't. Nothing else really needs to be said.

Because you clearly didn't watch the video

@@UlexiteTVStoneLexite True... after about 25 minutes I gave up...typically you present your ideas clearly and then provide supporting evidence.

Chris Gough - Cultural Marxism as projected by rich people’s right wing propaganda doesn’t exist.

Because there was a conflation that was made by Third Wave Feminists when they made their critical thory of social studies. They grabbed Antonio Gramsci and Herbert Markuse and came up with intersectionality and PC. All of this is to blame on the Modern Liberals of the 1980's and 1990's. Calling it Cultural Marxism is like me saying there's something such as Liberal Fascism.

@@WorldGovernmentGeoInstitut For my part, I would have no problem with anyone saying "liberal fascism" if they explained what they mean by it. Maybe I'll say I don't like the label, and that's all. But I won't necessarily deny the reality they are pointing to.

Defending Marxist principles and going after its critics whilst denying cultural marxism. So much to learn...

We need more people refuting them. Ridiculing won't work anylonger.

Dee Snider yeah it sounds so scientific

@stephen noonan so why are left leaning people not able to refute right winger not anylonger ? How can you believe in something you can't defend.

@@meezanlmt I was interested in this comment, but I haven't properly understood the question. Would you mind expanding on it please?

@@umutyigit4918 I hope I'm not misrepresenting. I think what he is getting at, is if someone like Peterson makes some interesting points and I am unable to argue against what he is saying and instead just shout 'fascist', which is nonsense and I wish others on the left would just stop, then maybe I need to consider that actually he is right and my position is weak.

@@campbell1213 Oh I see now, thank you that makes more sense. When it comes to Jordan Peterson and a good argument against him this video isn't the best unfortunately. While it seems contrarian to suggest that the new Left wing is both post modernist and cultural Marxist there is claim to this. Take the trans gender movement which claims that gender is a infinity variable construct and not something that modern science and reason can understand and its alliance the feminist moment (Post first wave) which has links to Marxism throughout. Both claim that there is an oppressor and a victim but one deals with a supposed meta physical and the other the physical. Interestingly enough the unison is beginning to break as post modernism and Cultural Marxism cannot go together which this video rightly claimed. This was marked with a Meghan Murphy a key feminist talker being banned off of twitter by her followers after she stated that men are not women. The PM idea that gender is fluid and meta physical makes the concrete female male divide obsolete and so feminism becomes obsolete. Therefore Peterson's claim that it is both PM and CM is correct only in that for the time being they occupy the same space and audience. While I agree that the position of oppressor and victim is weak it has a point in that we should help those who cannot be as competent to become more competent as that benefits everyone. Especially economically as more skilled workers equals more profits and developments. Jordan Peterson even brings this up in one of his talks about IQ. The talk keyed in that the Military after researching IQ and effectiveness since the 1916 agreed to only have members with an IQ over 83, anything under would be counter productive. 10% of the population come into this category. Therefore we should do something about this to make it better and to help those who struggle. What I don't agree with is creating fake claims that there are oppressors and victims in order to progress your political agenda. If you have other counter points or want to discus more I would be happy to hear what you have to say, I am sure there are points I am missing.

@@campbell1213 thank you you said it better than I did.

How do you know the white women aren't Jewish? Or white looking Hispanic?

I think he's compensating for the fact that he doesn't believe a word any of them is saying. It's so obvious those bastards are in it for the money. (Recently Blare White even left those circles talking about how many of them don't believe most of the things they say, don't know if Molyneux is one of them for sure but there's a lot of over-compensating going on)

There’s something deeply unsettling about that guy

Why would you ever do that? he doesn't speak anything that is extremely controversial.

@@Ravenz-ux7pb seriously??

@@fredatlas4396 he doesn't

Thanks to globalism, of course.

Capitalism and feminism are not mutually exclusive though.

Two incomes per person

@I Smash Back Misogynists are so cute when they're mad

@I Smash Back Your only other comment on this channel unironically uses "soy-chugger"

@Anglo Scott > Unfortunately the social democrat policy on replacement migration No, you are talking like a conspiratorial alt-right nutcase. No offense but I hate your kind. You and your ilk are the reason we got hit by a terrorist attack in Norway. People like you spreading online this myth of treason by social democrats, which made them targets for terrorist attacks by alt-right nutters. Words matter. They are not harmless. You can easily discover the truth about immigration in say Norway, but instead you prefer to peddle poorly research conspiracy theories.

@Anglo Scott > but are you really denying the fact that globalists are using replacement migration as a means to keep birth rates higher There is no nefarious globalist organization hatching evil plans to commit some sort of white genocide. There is no "plan". Thinking that points to a conspiratorial mindset. > means to keep birth rates higher therefore contributing to overpopulation which in turn inevitably ruins environment and nature Eh... so the these nebulous globalists are actively trying to accomplish overpopulation and environmental ruin? Why on earth do they want to do that? Why would anyone want that? Are you aware of how insane that sounds? Secondly, birthrates tend to fall for people moving to the west, so if overpopulation is the goal, you would try to avoid getting them to the west. > all because their crony corporate elite buddies want enough cheap labour to fund their 50th Lamborghini and 10th mansion whilst not paying taxes. A truly strange mix of ideas there. I don't know how it is where you live, but Norwegian companies have no need of low skilled labor from the third world, which you seem to be terrified of. Companies make money from skilled labour here. > I can link you demographic projections and live births data from the UK showing we'll become a minority around 2070 Those are just projections of current trends. By no means do the represent some certain future. These reports tend to not take into account that birth rates are falling all over the world, and that each successive generation of migrants converge with the birth rates of the native population. Most of the second generation immigrants I know in Norway, have about the same number of kids as native Norwegians. My wife's parents were immigrants to North America. Their respective families had 5 and 8 kids each. But my wife just has a brother. That is a BIG drop in brith rate. > no idea how you idiots calls us conspiracy theorists, the globalists are so open about this. You are idiots because you think there is some sort of deliberate plan to REPLACE white people. That is conspiratorial. Secondly it is conspiratorial to think it is some sort of leftist or social democratic idea. In Norway the immigration policy has been developed by both the left and the right. Social democrats have often been among the most strict on immigration. But for some reason, alt-right conspiracy theorist like to blame social democrats for immigrants and paint them as some sort of traitor. In this way alt-righters justify mass murder on social democrats. That is why Anders Behring Breivik killed over 70 people and blew up part of Oslo. He wanted to kill all social democrats. He would not have had these ideas if it had not been people like yourself propagating these kind of conspiracies. You want to know WHY we have immigration? It isn't to REPLACE whites. It has been the last year primarily for humanitarian reasons. We lived through a world war in Norway being occupied by Nazi Germany. Many Norwegians became refugees. That was not always easy, because many people like today, didn't like refugees. Like today they eagerly sent them back. A great portion of Jews e.g. trying to flee to the UK, the US and Israel got sent back to Germany, to the gas chamber. Look I don't WANT refugees in Norway. But I also don't want to be a cold hearted asshole turning my back to people in need. I know that in the past, MY OWN PEOPLE, where ones depending on the generosity of others. Who knows what the future will bring? I am open to discussing alternative ways of helping refugees. We could e.g. have special zones for them, maybe even special zones or countries setup by the west close to where they flee from. Lets here the alternatives. But alt-right is not interested in this, because they don't actually see a humanitarian problem that needs to be solved. Rather they see an evil conspiracy by evil "globalists" who are trying to destroy the white race. That is why you are a conspiracy theorist.

Yeah anyone who disagrees with the left are automatically stupid and facists. So predictable, so tedious.

@@ripley7222 it's not about disagreeing per say. People who haven't read Marx, or Marxist thinkers, should sit down and shut up.

It's dangerous

They are all intertwined... It's practically identical

@@truthhurts79 $5 says you've never read a book in your life.

SpuddySpud or the entire movement of liberation theology.

SpuddySpud or the literal Marxist, Dr. Martin Luther King...

THEY'RE EVERYWHERE!!!

Or Jeremiah Wright and the majority of the United Church of Christ influenced by Paul Tillich.

He also, while making a public speech, mocked people for believing that “Magic Jesus” will save them. This is EXACTLY what is meant by the term CULTURAL MARXISM. Chris Hedge is a left winger who wormed his way into a very traditional institution for which he has utter contempt in order to make it serve a left wing humanist agenda. How is this hard to see?

It took a long time to find this but cultural Marxism was a term coined by a Trent Schroyer(left leaning scholar) who looked at the Frankfurt school and how they viewed cultural elements. Look up gramsci and his work on the economic base/superstructure(culture that uphold economic base(capitalism) and cultural hegemony(dominate culture/ruling class oppressing all forms of opposition). Gramsci believed the economic based can’t be changed to communism until the superstructure is changed or they gain control of it. It’s all about changing the culture to change the view of communism from controversial to mainstream. Have fun searching

@300bpm It's the fucking weirdest thing to me on planet earth when people know what cultural marxism is and deny its effect.

@@ThatGuyDownInThe but the frankfurt School didn't like postmodernism

Volcel police!