It'll get a bit wetter as it goes through it's cycle and it's warmer than the ice age cycle!!!! Nobody can stop earth's cycles !!!! You have to educate ourselves into believing the real facts about our planet. How many times does it snow ball How many more times will it snow ball. What world history do we know about the HOT AGE!? WE Don't LIVE LONG ENOUGH TO KNOW.

Hahahahahahahaha brainwashed.

​@@justinjefferson5831yep, that's exactly what you are!!

@@Supportingtruth8258 Hahahaha. As proved by merely pointing out that the whole thing is nothing but corruption and propaganda? You admit you are brainwashed because you confuse science with television, government propaganda, and corporate grifting - can't tell the difference - and you DON'T CARE that 100% of their doomsday predictions have proved FLATLY INCORRECT. You're saying you don't care about the truth. That's what you're saying. Only fools believe the globe is about to become uninhabitable because of alleged manmade catastropic global warming. Only gullible simpletons, or people with an anxiety disorder, or power freaks, buy into the whole pile of obvious hype and propaganda. The proof is that you can't even state your case without wallowing in contradicdtion and absurdity HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA!

Or stop believing the bullshit lies. I cannot understand how people can be so damned gullible especially in a time where information is readily available. Just a note Einstein, the earth's climate has always changed and we humans have minimal impact on anything.

WE, along with our kids and grandkids 😢

The problem is not the unwilling but rather those who even understand /ignore the facts

Even if we know this, we all need to make action plans. And, with too much conspiracy theories going on (which might hold truth to some degrees), we do need to plan step by step shifts into more energy sufficient, environmentally friendly way of living. Just fighting with those who hold authorities is like babies with tantrum. We need more data, planning, and brilliant problem solving skills!!!! No more just yelling for change. We need change IN OURSELVES & IN OUR MINDS!!! All of us need to use each individual skills to come to advance in this new era 🌏🌎🌍

@@orca1717 we have already enough data for this but we don't do it

@@imtheeastgermanguy5431 Well, but the data is conflicting, and also manipulated (funded largely) by companies with power, and no one can deny that facts. Also, each one of us can’t just do things the better way when the better way is more costly (in the time of inflation, we are naturally less inclined to do that.) It’s a systematic problem that every each of us needs to chip in for the better ideas. You can’t just blame the big corporations or government. “WE” are you and me, and everyone on earth.

The plants and animals don’t.

​@@Thorny_Misanthrope Nature doesn't care either way. Also even though specialist species will be wiped out by climatic and environmental changes as they were before during mass extinctions do not forget that the generalists tend to survive and then they shall diversify. Nature as a whole won't ever care about us, the survivors will diversify, nature will heal and retake everything. Life is far hardier as a whole than we are. Do not kid yourself, the reason humanity battles climate change is to save our own sorry asses. Conservation efforts are less about saving plants and animals and more about maintaining ecosystems. Sadly very few people care about anything outside their own lives.

We can’t control congress and big oil!!!

@@margaretwebb389 Yes, we could but that would get really bloody really fast.

@@margaretwebb389 That would mean war and no one wants that. There's enough blood being spilled already.

Curious what your June has been like this year, and I’m aware there isn’t necessarily consistency. Thanks for your share!

"nah it's only geo engineering, cloud seeding and haarp..!"

@@imtheeastgermanguy5431 Climate change is IRREVERSABLE! Get it? The temps will NEVER GO DOWN - unless the CO2 already emitted is TAKEN OUT OF THE AIR! Our future generations can expect a "hothouse Earth", like during the dinosaur age - and this age will last for a long, long, long time.

@@sydfrissell I get it but I'm not sure if we can reverse it. It's a huge effort but it's possible. I guess if the climate change is going faster than there are no more future generations

In other words an extreme WEATHER event. It soared above 98°F in Fairbanks every summer under the Midnight sun...but NOT the last two years of Summer With No Summer. *Magic CO2!*

It's around 200 years ago. And now we are here 😢

Aarhenius was first but he concluded CO2 And water vapor tend to MODERATE temperatures, so Greta quickly discarded his pioneering work.

​@@robertmarmaduke186 first how? Eunice Foote's discoveries (in her 1850's experiments!), "revealed that certain gases, including carbon dioxide (CO2), warm when exposed to sunlight. She hypothesized that higher CO2 levels in the past would have significantly affected Earth’s temperature, foreshadowing our understanding of the greenhouse effect." Arrhenius didn't make note of this phenomena until 1896. So not sure of your claim that Arrhenius was first. In fact, Foote, without specific evidence and purely by intellectual conjecture, was absolutely correct! As during a much earlier geologic period (the Eocene), CO2 levels were higher and the climate temperature back then was also substantially higher (not like 1.5 degrees C that we talk about today - but more like 5 degrees C!) So, the issue with the planet is not its absolute temperature, but the rate of change of temperature. Most every creature I can think of has lived for 10s of millions of years in our moderate climate. They have become acclimated. But if, in the blink of an eye (on an evolutionary or geologic timescale,) has to adapt to a 3 or 4 degree C change within a few centuries... that's the end of that group of animals and plants. Humans included. Got it? And yes, Arrhenius did note that, "in an atmosphere with no carbon dioxide, Earth’s surface temperature would plummet by about 21 degrees Celsius." But we live in an atmosphere that is now around 425 ppm of CO2, substantially higher than when either Foote and Arrhenius were alive. Thus, global sea and surface air temperatures are substantially higher than their 1800s due to the impact of substantially higher CO2 and methane atmospheric concentrations... DUE TO HUMAN CONTRIBUTIONS OF THOSE GASES. It is a simple fact. As for water, you should do a little reading into the impact of water vapor in the atmosphere.... and how the small incremental impact of CO2 and methane tend to occlude an important portion of what is called the “water-vapor window.” I know you want to parrot the newsfeed of your favorite propaganda channel. You want to deny the reality of where the world is headed. You want to be able to tell your children - “everything is OK, just keep your head down and get a job in finance - because then you can afford a nice lifestyle.” But I tell you, there isn’t any amount of praying to a god or a god’s son that will alter our path to 4 or 5 degrees C increase in global temperatures. No technology will save us. So, enjoy your time here. Good luck to you and your kids.

@@robertmarmaduke186 what has Greta to do with this topic?

@@imtheeastgermanguy5431 Greta's the _paid child actress_ Gore hired to 'bring home' his Carbon Cap & Trade Scheme (actual legal name) green-wáshing extörtion rácket, that's causing $Trillions in structural mal-investment with CRUSHING cost impacts on the Workers. Greta is your Vírgín Máry, your Joán de'Arç!

Yessirr

and our unending ability to procreate....

This is a story about profit.

@@oceancowboy otherwise known as capitalism.

#479 This is a story about unelected self appointed foreign Grifters and Scienters looting Millennials' Boomer Inheritance. FIFY

Hueberous 😂 yes I blame it on that everyday! Buncha greedy useless jerks will pay the price 😂

Depends on long it takes our civilization to transition away from fossil fuels, it could take between one thousand and ten thousand years for the climate to recover.

Hey when Siberian melt alone releases more co2 then we could ever ?? get your facts straight even if we stopped now it's on a domino effect 😂 and now we see the results of all that greed .earths done with us ....again...😢

@@dp-kz5cs I can tell you and the rest of the folks commenting here are very ignorant, but then again ignorance is bliss.

​@@dp-kz5csIf that is true. Why did the melting of the Scandinavian and North American ice sheets not produce similar runaway warming?

😅

And those who can punctuate and use CAPITAL letters!!!

Thank you for sharing that.

And yet everything they said was correct, only it's worse 5 years later!

And what did we all do different for the last five years? Not much.

When, not if.

I heard if the amoc is going down Europe will be colder but probably not a ice age, maybe I winter it's harder or longer but in summer there are heavy storms and rain are going on. The German scientist "harald lesch" said it like this "imagine in winter when it's cold outside and warm inside, look at the windows how much moisture is there. That will happen to us when Europe is cooling down and the rest of the earth is heating up, those rainfalls we won't experience!" I guess that he is right

Every species alive today survived dice Ages and tropical waves of 4,000ppm CO2. Why be such a drama queen?

@@robertmarmaduke186 "Every species alive today survived dice Ages and tropical waves of 4,000ppm CO2. Why be such a drama queen?" Regarding the first point, that's misleading and irrelevant. Humans are currently warming the planet ~20 times faster than it usually warms when coming out of an ice age. It is that SPEED of temperature change that makes it so lethal--species don't have the time to adapt or migrate. For example, oak trees are not able to walk 1/4 mile a year, but if temperature change is happening 20-50 times more slowly, where their acorns can make it 50-75 feet from the trunk of the tree. Regarding the second point, NO, they didn't. Global CO2 levels are now the highest they have been in 14 million years; neither humans nor many other species on Earth have ever seen CO2 levels this high. Furthermore, if you are going to look at CO2 charts vs. time, you would be well advised to look at extinction charts vs. time too, because large changes in CO2 levels have been THE main "kill mechanism" for the many extinction events in Earth's history. I always laugh when climate skeptics make a big deal of the "explosion of life" that happened during the Cambrian period "with very high CO2" levels. Those folks don't seem to know that a) the explosion of life was all in the oceans; there was no life on land, b) the largest living things were ~16 inches long, c) the explosion of life appears to have happened because of rising oxygen levels, and d) CO2 levels were lower for most of the Cambrian Period but when they got very high at the end of the Cambrian Period, that triggered a major extinction event. The science is very clear that humans are pushing the whole web of life toward catastrophic collapse in 4 different ways simultaneously, so pointing out the risks from AGW isn't being a drama queen, it's actually being understated regarding the threats we face. Take care.

@@karlwheatley1244 Submarines have CO2 levels that won't be reached until year 3000. So they are NOT lethal to species. At previous "+1.2°C Since Industrialization" or +0.006°C per year even CLAIMED BUT VERIFIED "+1.8°C by 2100" or measly +0.04°C per year NONE of the extreme weather events *NONE* can be blamed on increasing CO2. *That is ANTI-Science fraud.* The "official" 443ppm CO2 or whatever is bollux, there are readings from other sampling locations as low as 235ppm, that have been taken down so as not to change the narrative. Their 'Hottest Day on Record!' said in the report you didn't read (...climate model simulation...). The track record for all 37 climate models is ABYSSMAL forecasting or hindcasting. *GIGO*

If only it was that simple. Trees under 20 years old actually emit more CO2 than they absorb, according to Oregon State University. Just digging a hole to plant a tree releases more CO2 from the organisms there than the tree will absorb in several years. What we need to do above all else is preserve old-growth forests because that's where the heavy CO2-lifting is done.

@@swiftlytiltingplanet8481 I pretty much agree with everything you post, and I agree with protecting old-growth forests, but I'm questioning this. How does a growing tree emit more CO2 than it absorbs? I haven't seen that anywhere else and I'm questioning the analysis they did. I get that digging a hole releases some CO2 but fighting the climate crisis is a marathon not a sprint, and what you're saying about trees' CO2 footprint over the first couple of years is like the fact that the carbon footprint of an EV is higher until you get to about 23K miles. In the long run, the EV and more forests are still better (even though fewer vehicles is better still). Large-scale agricultural research on "if everyone adopted a vegan diet" calculated over 600 billion tons of CO2 sequestered by 2050 (bc we could feed the world using 75% less land and could re-forest and re-wild the rest). I don't see anything else on the horizon that could sequester 600 Gt of CO2--and have staggering benefits for biodiversity and water shortages. Of course, people should plant diverse forests and ecosystems, not monoculture plantations, and it should be native species, etc. Take care and thanks for your diligent online work.

@@karlwheatley1244 I was just as taken aback by this as you are. The research was conducted by Dr. Beverly Law from Oregon State University. Her research went on for years with some pretty sophisticated equipment. PBS did a profile on her and her work. I tried to post a link to the show but the forum blocked it. However, you can Google it at WEATHERED: SURPRISING TRUTH BEHIND PLANTING TREES AND CLIMATE CHANGE.

@@swiftlytiltingplanet8481 Thanks for the reply.

And phasing out fossil fuels would help too.

The Little ice Age dropped global temperature by an AVERAGE of about 1.1 F. There were pockets or regions that experienced double this amount of cooling but it was never synchronously cold around the world. Mimimum temperatures happened at different times for different places. The minimums hit the eastern Pacific during the 15th century, northwestern Europe and southeastern North America during the 17th century, and most remaining regions during the mid-19th century. A 1-2 degree drop in global temperatures is not going to kill us or prevent us from farming. A full blown Ice Age, by contrast, can drop global temperature 4-8C, and that would indeed get us into trouble. But nobody is forecasting a full-blown reglaciation like that. The next major reglaciation, in fact, isn't expected for about 100,000 years.

@@swiftlytiltingplanet8481 Well you maybe correct or someone else maybe correct only time will tell with the limited information along with forecasting this next climate disaster, But one thing is for sure our planet will cool around 2050 when the earth starts an elliptical orbit along with the earths axis tilting away for our sun, NASA & NOAA have already determined this to be fact, But no one can determine just how this event will effect the planet. Only time will tell what will happen. My advice to all is humanity has time to prepare for this event and if it's effects are minimum then we have no issues, but if the effects create what experts are saying it will, then it is better to be prepared then not to be. I thank you for your response it gives all of us a lot to think about and gives us all time to make the right choices for our families. Thank you again

@@user-jf6pz5jx8g You're referring to Milankovitch cycles, which are already in cooling phases and have been for centuries. Milankovitch Cycles work on huge timescales, so we'll be feeling exactly nothing but more warming when 2050 arrives. Greenhouse gases easily overpower Milankovitch Cycles. Earth's orbital eccentricity progresses over a period of 100,000 years, and its current status should be COOLING the earth, not warming it. Ditto axial tilt, which is at about 23.4 degrees, or about halfway between its extremes, and this angle is very slowly decreasing in a cycle that spans 41000 years. We're talking about less than a degree of temperature change every thousand years or so. This is not what you should be worried about, especially when our emissions have short-circuited this normal process of change.

No, thousands of research studies prove that our emissions caused ~98% of global warming since 1900. It has nothing to do with those other factors you listed.

Plant based transportation!

@@duanecarroll8255 the United Nations reported that animal agriculture produces more greenhouse gases then combining all transportation

The single most effective way to reduce your impact is to have fewer children. Full stop.

@@someguy2135 Are we feeding livestock crude oil?

​@@bill8985no

I heard it in the news. Looks horrible

@@HeavyMetal45 not funny

Increase in CO2 is not really 'exponential' and certainly not in any case from the Western nations. IEA published fossil fuel data show the meager 3% contribution from humans is mostly India/China, the rest is terrestrial or insects or rotting soil and would still continue to increase CO2 levels at 97% as fast if humans ceased to exist. _"The sweater chewing Luddite and the cud-chewing cow, are remarkably alike, yet different somehow. Ahh yes, I remember it now, the intelligent look on the face of the cow!"_ Peter Torbay

Yes we are cactus. The elites And governments who.dont Care they'll die to. But money And greed comes first greedy Companies polluting water. River seas. Plastic man worse Pollutant. In us sea food. Oceans. Fish eat the micro Plastic . Birds eat it killing There own baby's. Man is Mans worst enemy. Cheers

So pretend that praying actually does something?

@@swiftlytiltingplanet8481 🤣

@@muhammad-bin-american If you contract cancer, which would you prefer: chemotherapy or prayer? If you could choose only one, which would it be?

@@swiftlytiltingplanet8481 🤣🤣🤣I say praying to Jehovah is always needed. He makes miracles all the time. You can try it and you will be surprised.

@@muhammad-bin-american Jehovah makes miracles all the time? Where was he when 6 million Jews prayed to be saved from the Holocaust and were gassed to death? Where was he durng the rape of Nanking? Where was he when Joseph Stalin killed millions of his own people? Where is he today with the slaughter-fest in Ukraine and Gaza? Why do babies and children get bone cancer and die? Why are there over 2000 diseases that can kill us at any given time? Why must living organisms have to slaughter and consume other living organisms in order to survive? What kind of a compassionate god designs a world like this? You're fooling yourself with selective observation. Millions of tragedies take place every day on this earth and you look the other way and dismiss it with the inane "God works in mysterious ways" excuse.

This is not nature. This is greedy humans destroying the amazing world we have because they want more money. They don't care if billions die as long as their profits keep coming in.

500% yield in corn yield due to increase in CO2 is patently untrue! In fact, it’s been demonstrated that corn is adapted to the CO2 levels of the pre-industrial environment and cannot take advantage of extra CO2.

@parrisgjerde9212 Why don't you follow the sources I have referenced, and/or provide some references to support your position?

@parrisgjerde9212 Try these for size: The Earth has greened by 15% or more in a human lifetime. "The greening of the planet over the last two decades represents an increase in leaf area on plants and trees equivalent to the area covered by all the Amazon rainforests. There are now more than two million square miles of extra green leaf area per year"(NASA, 2019). Observations of Earth’s vegetative cover since the year 2000 by NASA’s Terra satellite show a 10% increase in vegetation in the first 20 years of the century. Global tree canopy cover increased by 2.24 million square kilometers (865,000 square miles) between 1982 and 2016 (Nature, 2018). As well as human intervention, the reasons for this include forests expanding polewards aided by additional CO2 and a slight rise in temperature. Increased CO2 causes this in two ways: it has a direct fertilising effect (the CFE), and it increases drought tolerance by reducing stomata. This greening of the Earth due to CO2 is now "an indisputable fact" (Chen et al, 2024). In fact, 55.15% of those areas greening have been doing so at an accelerated rate since 2001. Since the start of the Industrial Revolution the Earth's primary productivity has increased by more than 30% (Campbell et al, 2017 and Haverd et al, 2020).

That is your opinion I think that she did great but not really much understood it until now

Nukes doesn't help and for a you need energy but from where?

@@imtheeastgermanguy5431 "This is the fastest climate ch....." is a death sentence for big mammals. The AC+Nuke shit - is just sarcasm

@@volkerengels5298 what is going on with you?

@@imtheeastgermanguy5431 "This is the fastest climate ch....." - is the important part. If you have questions...

@@volkerengels5298 yes it's a pretty fast climate change. When the dinosaur was dying it was much faster but it wasn't because of the climate change

In a lot of cities, for a lot of people, there isn't good public transportation. I don't have access to it at all, but if I did, it wouldn't work most of the time with my erratic work schedule. If I got off work at 12 am (often), the whole system would be shut down. I can't bicycle 30 miles one way. ... Having a good public transportation system would be VERY useful for me, if it was there. And no, I can't afford to move.

Some parts yes

And there are people trying to extend lifespan to 120. Why

Why?

​@@imtheeastgermanguy5431 In the future the scientists will know they recommended the whole thing backwards. First of all that excluding every car that emits water vapor (by burning fossil fuels) caused both draught and flood. Without enough vegetation (trees, bushes...) for transpiration at different heights the catastrophe were a fact. The relative humidity over both land and sea has been lower and lower for decades now. See on internet the "humidity paradox".

@@stigsrnning6459 no. fossil fuel emits co2 and other gases such as water/steam. co2 is heating up the earth

...deep.....

No. It’s the lizard people!!1! 🙈

No, thousands of research studies prove that our emissions caused ~98% of global warming since 1900.

To paraphrase George Carlin- The planet will live forever. Humans the other hand, will not. Especially if we don't change significantly and soon.

Well its 2024 , my state is now in a state of emergency from drought, which I've BEEN saying , but you wouldnt think wva could be in a drought huh? Think of all the coal under our feet that will make centralia look like a camp fire . That's my fear tbh . Godbless all ❤

low IQ Bob

We're seeing substantially more extreme precipitation events, according to the EPA and IPCC data. It makes perfect scientific sense. Every degree of temperature rise allows the air to hold an additional 7% of moisture. That's creating more and larger atmospheric rivers, which are producing Biblical downpours much more often.

@@swiftlytiltingplanet8481 where was that 7% obtained from ? Iceland ? Peru ? NZ ? Be very wary of global average claims.

@@user-eu4zy6rm3l It has nothing to do with location. It's a well-known law of thermodynamics. See the Clausius-Clapeyron equation.

Dont you feel stupid beingt he 'guy in the commmentsectionm'-trope. The negative stereotype? Imean,look at yourt comment. Its not just not constructive, it's actively making big Efforts striving to be that word's Opppositeee

Smell smoke in your house. Could it be a fire? "Nope. Go back to sleep." If right: No wasted effort. If wrong: Lost house, life, family. "Maybe/Yep. Take action." If right: Save house, life, family. If wrong: Wasted effort. "Nope" is the only option with dire consequences.

@@ionymous6733 I watched a simple experiment with a transparent Water Tank on a movable leveller years ago here on YT. Looked for it really hard last summer, but it's gone. The demonstration proved that an Oil Spill could stop and even reverse the current. Don't be so quick to think it's Up There, when it may be Down There. Which scenario do you think could pull the greatest amount of Tax Dollars from our pockets?

@@ionymous6733 Better safe than sorry!

Ignoring facts will kill you

Wrong!!!!! It's all about emissions

Yes, those things... because they lead to more emissions.

Are you willing to be “one less”? If not then how can you say there are too many people?

In the 1960s, overpopulation was a concern.

In 2005, I was expected to die of natural causes. If I had it my way, I would have been allowed to die, but my unconscious body was found and taken to the hospital. I have been a United States citizen all my life. Western men are much too wimpy. 😆🤣

Please publish your amazing research on this subject, and get a NOBEL PRIZE!

That cycle happens every 11 years. Not the problem.

No

​@@amilias1000you mean the sun cycle?

Trillions of tons of co2 released every year. You don’t think that’s maybe a factor?

The Bible explains everything? The same Bible that tells us God drowned everyone on earth except for Noah and his clan? The same Bible that tells us to stone to death homosexuals, people who worship other gods, children who talk back to us and old men who collect wood on the Sabbath? Hmmmmm.

ya bible is book of fairy tales ...........fats over rule faith

facts

"What climate change?" You must not be a farmer, gardener, skier, or someone who follows trustworthy news channels of science to not know about man-made global warming and climate disruption. The ski season is not 4-5 weeks shorter than it was in 1980 because our emissions are currently warming the planet ~20 times faster than it usually warms when coming out of an ice age/glaciation period. That rate of warming is lethally fast and at least half of plant and animal species are trying to move to someplace cooler. Many species will fail to find new places to live that are both as cool as where they used to live had been and that have the other things they need to survive and thrive.

And watch the climate refugees come ashore, haha.

Uh, the ocean is gonna claim the coast. No beach. No beach houses.

Yeah did you even understand just a bit what the problem is?

​@@ceeemm1901I think that there will be so much that they can walk over the water with all the dead bodies underneath 😢😢😢

Funny?? what is wrong with you?

@@imtheeastgermanguy5431 Over active imagination.😀

@@davidfromamerica1871 you know that drugs aren't good for the human body and brain

@@imtheeastgermanguy5431 That is not what my psychiatrist tells me.🥸 Psychiatric medication for schizophrenia.😵‍💫😍😎👍

Wild the way they made all those fake videos.

​@@Bushman9they can proof what they are saying

It's no BS!!!

Literally a child putting your fingers in your ears and closing your eyes

@@jthomashair Sadly though, this “child” can vote.

Where are these prophecies recorded?

There is no increase in volcanic activity now. The Bible also said the world was flat and that stars were the size of figs. We really don't want to get our science from what men from 3000 years ago wrote.