Hey Ana, we are very happy to hear how pleased you are with your Anoris T i-Size car seat 😍

if the car is in a crash with several cars, does the airbag only help with the first impact? if the car vaults, will the child slip out of the seat? if you break hard but not hard enough for it to go off, won't it strain the childs neck? and if it goes off for a hard break but not so hard that its an accident, will you need to buy a new one then? don't see how this is safe at all.

@@JuliaStuxberg yes it will only help with the first impact, just like a car. No they will not slip out. The chair knows when it's a crash, just like your car airbags don't go off when breaking. The impact shield alone does a better job protecting their neck than just straps. And also, with this chair. You are protected from front and rear collisions. With a rear facing you are not protected from rear end collisions.

@@dts7824 I still don't understand why anyone would choose this over beside stretch for example. Sweden has a test called the plus test. its much harder to pass then ADAC. No forward facing chair has yet passed the test ever. And they test for frontal collision, rear end collision, side impact, vaulting, and in higher speed than ADAC. i think that speaks for it self. If this chair pass the plus test then i can accept it.

@@JuliaStuxberg they don't test forward facing seats. This seat was perfect for me as I explained, I no longer have room for my 2.5 year old rear facing because he is tall and so am I. This is the next best thing

ok pql ppl i’ll

Haha yes and I thought those were great!! I wish my babies were still little. I'd use this. My youngest is almost 6

Hey Arizona, the Anoris T i-Size airbag inflates to a consistent volume. The shape and size of the airbag is designed to protect a range of different body shapes and sizes. Our tests prove that the system does not harm younger children but still maximally protects the oldest occupant, that fits the Anoris T i-Size. We hope this helps to clarify this, but please do let us know if you have any more questions 😊

Hi, as a company we consider Child Safety a core value therefore, the passion expressed for safety is always admired. We as a company still greatly respect and promote rear facing travel for as long as possible, but now with the addition of the Anoris T i-Size, parents with alternative solutions for seats in this age category is provided. We aim to help every client, customer and parent find the child seat that meets their individual requirements and expectations.

Hi Christina, thank you for your reaching out. The Anoris T i-Size airbag works by limiting the forward motion of of the child's body and head during a crash, reducing the effect of impact force. In a frontal crash, the airbag inflates within milliseconds, acting like a flexible cushion that dampens head and body movement in a similar way to a standard car airbag. Therefore the child's head will come into contact with the airbag, but not with enough force to cause significantly injury. Generally speaking, any possible injury caused by safety measures during a crash must be weighed against the potential injurie is that could happen if that safety measure isn't used. For example, wearing seatbelts can cause bruising during a crash. However, if someone does not wear a seatbelt they may suffer much more serious injury. While there may be a small chance the operation of the airbag could cause a minor inury, this would be a considerably better outcome than a serious injury that may occur without the cushioning and restraining effect of the air bag.

We strongly recommend that you replace a car seat after any kind of accident. Even if the airbag did not deploy during the accident there may be tiny hairlines cracks in the seat, which may not be visible to the naked eye. These cracks can diminish the level of protection provided by the seat.

@@cybexglobal Can the electronics of Anoris T i-Size make a difference between a real impact from a violent braking ? It has logically no "impact sensors" just like cars, so would it accidentally inflate even if there's no car crash ? In your promotional video, the woman brakes suddenly when she sees a deer crossing... then you show a 3D simulation of the airbag that inflates... and after, we see the child with no airbag deployed! Is it because they had no impact ? If an impact is necessary to deploy the airbag, what speed is required to make it inflate ? How does that work ?

Hi Nima, you are right, the electronics can detect the difference this is why in this scenario the airbag did not deploy because there is no need for it. We also want to add that the airbag can only be triggered when installed in the car. We have tested the seat for thorough uses and misuses scenarios and we can confirm that there was no way the airbag can be triggered by you or the child. The isofix must be connected to the vehicle, the the load leg and impact shield needs to be installed. Even under these conditions, the electronics will only trigger the airbag if it detects the characteristic pattern of forces resulting from a severe frontal crash. This is similar to adult airbag system in a car. Thanks for giving us clarify this point.

I have just read an article with the owner of Cybex and he claims that this seat was his goal since the very beginning and he keep explaining. I will quote him and translate to English: "Toddlers in the back-facing seats take attention of the drivers from focusing on the road. This seat allows better interaction between the child and the parent via the mirrors while offering the same level of safety as the back-facing seats. There was a study made by TÜV made in 2017 which claims that 94 % parents started using the front-facing seats earlier than recommended by the manufacturer. In the other words, the whole child seats industry has commited to transport children back-faced, but parents did not. They want the practicality and comfort of front-facing seats as soon as posible". This was a quote and I would like to add some comments myself. I as well keep my children back-faced as long as possible, but it's just not an option for everyone. There are children with special needs etc. which just need to have the option to have the eye contact with parent as soon as possible. Also the study claims that vast majority parent ignore the recommendations anyway. So if there's a seat which can help with taht, it's great. Also, it's important to say, that this seat is recommended by manufacturer for children from age of 15 months till 6 years. A lot of children in this age cannot simply fit in the back-facing seats. So to summarize, I totally understand this product. Nobody is denying that back-facing seats are the safest option. But if, for any reason, you just need to use the front-facing one for your children, it's better be the one with airbag than the one without.

I partly agree with you. The interaction is quite difficult to talk about - driver needs to focus on the road, looking in the mirror to check the child as much as on the video is quite much. I understand some kids are "problematic" in any way (don't want to insult anyone) and even mirror, that is specially made for this, helps child and parent to interact with each other can't be the solution in rearward facing carseat - RWF is still better when your child needs to see you all the time when you sit next to him in the backseat 🙏 Yeah, I know sometimes there is no possibility to be there and need to drive too but it's always "some child from the milion" and many should be happily rearward facing. One thing that bothers me the most - minimal age. Limit "15 months" is just a norm for manufacturers, at least something was done but can you imagine that small child in it during crash? I saw the crash test video and immediately thought it might be very dangerous because the airbag is very fast and for such a small kid very low (just where his head is)... It's approved up to 115 cm, rwf up to 125 cm but the myth about legroom... Would you please send me the article/interview? Undoubtedly it's very visionary product but it should be used with much older child than 15 months (but yet, it'll always be mine opinion) ☺️ Thank you!

I support RWF but my 2-years-old baby can’t sit rear facing because he cries until vomites. That’s why we changed the direction, not for our comfort but for his comfort even when known that is less safe. We’ll pay attention to real tests of this seat because when RWF is not an option announcements like this are great for parents.

@@LenculkaGD I agree with what you're saying. I personally use RWF with that special mirror so I can see what's going on in the back. But I know that most people just don't bother. They will switch to front-facing as soon as possible and they don't care. Solution where everyone uses RWF would be great in ideal world, but for the real world, also safer front-facing seats are needed. Here's the link to the article, but it's in Czech language (my native), so I'm not sure if you will be able to take something out of it. Maybe you can try Google Translate, but I cannot guarantee correct translation. My quoted part is in the lower part of the article. They also speak about the crashtests and testing there. www.idnes.cz/auto/zpravodajstvi/martin-pos-cybex-detska-autosedacka-airbag-crashtest.A211107_165528_automoto_fdv

@@MartinPolreich and that is the problem - parents just don't bother because there is no education about it. And when you have your child rear facing longer then expected (12 months, really), you are just crazy and have loads of money to spend 🤦‍♀️ So the companies should make a word about it with many rwf carseats, not just one and "only" to 18 kgs. Osvěty již stačilo, díky za článek, bratře Čechu 🙋‍♀️🤣 Neberu jim to, sedačka je to fakt zajímavá, jen si říkám, jestli se spíš časem neukáže, že působí více zranění tou přelomovou vychytávkou 😬

Hi! We are sorry to hear that you are having a negative experience with one of our products. For the most effective assistance, we kindly ask you to contact us through our dedicated contact forms. You can reach us quickly and efficiently by clicking on the following link: www.cybex-online.com/en/gb/service-hub/contact/contact_us.html

Hello Sarah, the Anoris T i-Size airbag works by limiting the forward motion of the child's body and head during a crash, reducing the effect of impact force. In a frontal crash, the airbag inflates within milliseconds, acting like a flexible cushion that dampens head and body movement in a similar way to a standard car airbag. Therefore the child's head will come into contact with the airbag, but not with enough force to cause significant injury. The Anoris T i-Size is safer than a conventional forward facing car seat. We took our lead from the automotive industry, which for decades has been using airbags to improve passenger protection during road accidents. We adapted and developed the technology further to protect children's bodies. Through a rigorous development and testing process we created an airbag specifically designed to protect children from older than 15 months up until approx. six years old.

@@cybexglobal You didn’t answer the question, are you going to plus test the chair? If it’s as safe as you claim then it would be no problem to plus test it to prove it

Children get too big for rear facing, and I would rather my child get hit in the face with an air back than break their neck. I don't get why you would be against this 🤔

@@dts7824 children don’t grow too old for rearfacing until they’re ready to go into a booster seat. It really is that simple. Rear face until at least 4, and then straight into a booster. No need for forward facing in a harnessed seat

@@sarahcxx9260 try telling that to my son who has to sit behind his 6ft dad with his knees at his chin when rear facing. I wish I could keep him rear facing, but he's tall for his age too. I'm so glad I came across a seat like this as we are forced to go front facing. It's not like I have a small car either, a Volvo estate.

Heya Dusty! Thanks for sharing your opinion :) For children older than 15 months and younger than 6 years, we recommend using the Anoris T i-Size as the safest option. This is supported by our rigorous internal testing, which found that the Anoris T i-Size delivers 50% higher levels of safety than a comparable forward-facing seat with a harness system, and equal to better protection compared to a rear-facing car seat.

@@cybexglobal If that's true you can go on for the Swedian Plus Test. 😉

@cybex Can you show the evidence to support this claim?

How are people not getting this? Some people don't have room in their car for rear facing behind large adults.

@@dts7824 if there's space for a forward seat there is enough space for a rear faceing Seat. Because you need 55cm (i don't know how much inchs) between the nose of the kid to the seat in front of the kid. So if you don' t have this space you simply can' t drive the kid save. There are so many rear facing seats with diffrent space needs. I'm sure almost everybody would find the correct Seat for their car

Hey Lenna! We believe that any toddler older than 15 months will be best protected by an Anoris T i-Size. Equipped with a revolutionary impact shield with a built-in airbag, the Anoris T i-Size delivers unparalleled safety and the superior comfort and parent-child interaction of forward-facing travel. It is designed to carry children from 76 cm to 115 cm in height (max. 21 kg in weight), up to an age of approximately 6 years. CYBEX believes in providing the greatest freedom of choice to the customer, and therefore we will continue to offer car seats without airbags. Nevertheless, our brand recommendation for this age group is definitely the Anoris T i-Size. We are also looking forward to seeing the scores/ratings and test results of independent bodies such as the ADAC for example.

@@cybexglobal that's a shame you keep forgetting about Sirona. Have you internally tested and compared Sirona in RWF mode with Anoris? Thank you for your response, I am really curious. I also hope that you give Anoris T to VTI and NTF so they can proof that your brand new carseat is equally safe as rearward facing carseats - it will pass "Plus test"! None of forward facing carseat ever passed the test so you will be very lucky. I appreciate your time, thank you for answering me.

@@LenculkaGD Hey Lenna! Thanks for your reply :) We recommend using the Anoris T i-Size as the safest option. This is supported by our rigorous internal testing, which found that the Anoris T i-Size delivers 50% higher levels of safety than a comparable forward-facing seat with a harness system, and equal to or better protection compared to a rear-facing car seat, such as a Sirona model. We are also looking forward to seeing the scores/ratings and test results of independent bodies such as the ADAC for example. If you have any further questions, please don't hesitate to ask us and we will certainly try our best to reply during regular office hours with feedback for you. This is a revolutionary product, we are very confident of that. Thank you for all of your interest and have a nice day!

You going to rear face your child till age 6? Don't think so

@@dts7824 I will, thanks for asking.

It is unnecessary Alice.... Forward-facing is the natural way to ride, just as it is for adults, too. For children the eye contact with the parent or caregiver is unconstrained, the child has more legroom to grow into, and getting the child onboard and settled is easier. A 2017 TÜV study1 showed that 94% of parents surveyed had placed their child forward facing sooner than recommended. In other words, the industry is committed to rear-facing travel, but parents are not - and they want the comfort and convenience of forward-facing travel as soon as possible. Therefore our goal was to make forward-facing travel as safe as possible. The Anoris T i-Size is the result, using modern airbag technology to allow parents to choose forward-facing travel with peace of mind. * Müller g.; Kühn M.; Karakus B.; Bende J. Miusue of Child restraint systems: Additional aspects of the 2017 GDV field study; TÜV Conference 2019

@@cybexglobal But the safest way to ride is rearward facing, no arguing. Even for adults. There is multiple options for optimal legroom while riding rear facing, like axkid one (with isofix) and maxway plus and axkid minikid (installed with the cars seatbelt). If the eye contact is the problem, then get a mirror? I really can’t see why on earth one should let their kid ride facing forward. There are solutions, if you just look for them and are a little bit creative. My son is three years old and will OFCOURSE ride rearward facing until at least the age of six. For me, my child’s safety comes prior to their comfort (even if he rides very comfortable in his car seat). I’m glad I live in Sweden where it’s easy to let your kids ride the safest way possible

Any toddler older than 15 months will be best protected by an Anoris T i-Size. Equipped with a revolutionary impact shield with a built-in airbag, the Anoris T i-Size delivers unparalleled safety and the superior comfort and parent-child interaction of forward-facing travel. It is designed to carry children from 76 cm to 115 cm in height (max. 21 kg in weight), up to an age of approximately 6 years. CYBEX believes in providing the greatest freedom of choice to the customer, and therefore we will continue to offer car seats without airbags. Nevertheless, our brand recommendation for this age group is definitely the Anoris T i-Size.

@@cybexglobal Do you have any facts to back this up? Because I have a very hard time believing that a fwf chair could be safer than a bwf one. Nah, I’ll have my kids bwf as long as I can

Regarding the Swedish Plus test, the requirements for that test were considered during the development of the seat. Unfortunately, we have no influence on whether or not the Anoris will be selected for this test as it is completely independent, although we sincerely hope that the Anoris is selected for testing. If independent bodies such as the ADAC and Plus do select the seat for testing, they shall make the ratings public and this will prove its safety, but in the meantime, we can confirm that rigorous internal testing in over a thousand tests were conducted. Using our own Sirona series convertible harnessed car seat as a comparison, we established the following: 1.) The Anoris T i-Size (as forward-facing car seat) provides at least equal or mostly better protection than a standard rear-facing car seat in a frontal crash. 2.) The Anoris T i-Size (with impact shield and Airbag technology) has 50% better safety performance than a forward-facing harnessed child seat in a frontal crash.

When I see a comment from Czech/Slovak person, I don't take it seriously at all.I think in past 5 years I've read thousands comments made by Czech/Slovak people, and most of them (like 90%) doesn't make a sense.This is one of them.

@@arizonad8012 probably just a bot