You're an amazing father/mother

😊a😊xaaaa

Real

A tip: watch movies at flixzone. I've been using them for watching a lot of movies recently.

@Malachi Gus Definitely, been using flixzone} for months myself :D

Halo's probably

@@sebasgasenbeek1959 that's what I'm thinking too

came just for this comment, I knew that 2nd drop reminded me of something I heard before & I couldn’t remember what it was!

👊👊👊🔥🔥🔥

Yes. And the mid intro is a beast.

This is newschool track tho🤩.

También a mí me recordó al estilo clásico del hard

Are you talking about the version played on Qlimax?

There is no mid-intro in this track. What you are talking about is an anti-climax. As opposed to the climax (main drop), the anti-climax is supposed to make an effect of surprise, come unexpected. And if you don't like anti-climaxes, well sorry to inform you that they have always been part of hardstyle. As they are not in every tracks unfortunately and seem to disappear slightly those days, i still consider as one of the core elements of hardstyle. Oh and if you're wondering what an "mid-intro" is, it's basically the follow up of the intro (which you can hear in the extended versions most often). It results in a line of kicks too for the case of hardstyle, but it is often shorter than an anti-climax, and you can hear that along the kickline there is also some sort of build-up effect, which progressivly introduces the track.

@@SenzationZ yes that one

@@Koalexis OK so you're explaining me what anti climaxes and mid intros are, while you're the one who clearly has no clue I don't deny that they can be often mixed up, but often times the first non(/little)-melodic drop of a track, which comes after a short intro is in fact a mid-intro, and this one is indeed such case, only exception would be rare tracks with an extensive intro that are basically breaks, then yeah the definition mid-intro and anticlimax collide and become basically interchangeable (an example could be darkest hour, f.e. I call it mid intro, but if you called it anticlimax it would be way less of a deal than the case we're arguing on) Now, I'll give you an explanation of why you consider it an anti climax: the part we're considering does have an anticlimactic feeling , but in regard to what? Well, in this released version nothing, after the short intro there's this anticlimactic build up which leads into the mid intro (beware, something that's anticlimactic =/= anticlimax), but it in fact has way less of anti climatic feel cause, as I said, there's nothing to backen it up The original mid intro was so good cause, besides coming in unexpectedly (good feature for a mid intro, not necessary tho) it was divided in two parts:the one that's been cut and the one that remained, which was indeed anticlimactic towards the first part but calling it an anticlimax was still a stretch, it was just part of a two part mid intro, but it definetely isn't classifiable as a proper anticlimax in the official version. Now, was all the stuff I wrote necessary? Absolutely not, but since you came here spitting sentences acting like the know-all of hardstyle music I felt the need to reply with the most(eh, could have pushed it a bit more maybe ngl) smartass acting i could give cause you pissed me off, since you had no need to act like you did in the first place, especially for such a trivial matter

@@Koalexis i don't even know what ur saying, 0:33 There. That's the mid-intro. Extended Mix is usually just a random kick in the first minute and the longer climaxes

The mid intro is incredible what are you on about. Have you heard it live? Totally different experience

I agree, the 'warming up' is not often the best part but I think it is just important to complete the track. A few years these parts were way longer and in my opinion also better, but that also depends on the dj.

@@DiekePad Wtf the mid-intro is the best thing about this track, what are you trippin' on?

@@SenzationZ I meant that in the past the warming up were better than today.

I feel u, the mid-intro of lake of fire is sooo much better