On reflection, at 17:40 I made the assumption that the Chest Turn graphic was an actual direct output from the Sportsbox app. Or after the fact, did someone generate this chart manually using lots of data point extracted from the program? (that would be a labor intensive exercise)

I’ve been watching Dana in a variety of environments for several months now. He is exactly like my son in terms of how he communicates. It can easily be interpreted as rambling with big words if you don’t have the type of brain that can properly interpret the jargon. However, I 100% disagree with your characterization that he’s saying nothing. He is incredibly gifted with an ability to interpret the data and then arrive at an appropriate solution for a particular individual. There is no cookie cutter swing. We all have limitations and tendencies that necessitate a particular swing. Some love the weeds (Dana). Some like the forest. I love the weeds but I (like you) need to see the forest. We all think and interpret differently. But don’t be so critical of Dana. His words are magic if you can endure the tedium and criticality evaluate.

@@rpmfoto nonsense. if you understand what matters, you don’t concern yourself with what you are referring to as interesting or fascinating “data” he can’t even hit a ball hisself. do you need more proof than that? for god’s sake. be rational