SubhanaAllah. Soccer club. My love for my team increased

Daniel is an Ikhwani

@@ponderingspirit1475 better than a Madkhali

@@ponderingspirit1475 No he's not. Stop false accusations.

@@ponderingspirit1475 better than madkhali....

He lies against and slander Muslims who disagree with him

Western Muslim is different from Muslims ?

what exactly is a western muslim?

He is a Nazi!

Is that what you call muslim? the one who slander, name calling and label other muslims who don't agree with him? If arrogance and ignorance is charisma in your eyes, then it's your problem. Do not bring all "wester muslim" since you don't represent us.

Who are the others you are attacking baselessly? What do you mean by keeping it 100? That he's arguing why his statement of saying I'm a big Deobandi fan without any clarification is not controversial? He's clearly the least knowledgeable among the ones in the panel and he's completely missing the point.

Stoicism is haram

​@@Jaafar_Alkhalifawhat is the problem with deobandi? I don't find any accusation of shiekh uthman of deobandi scholars

@@Eskotericstoicism is sunnah

​@@endless782 dan was in error! There were pictures of qubur in big tabligi masjids. This opposes Sahih M. 532, book of Masjids. I have seen tabligi or deoband Ashari imams say Allah is everywhere. Not good. Quran says Allah is over His Throne, hadith of the abd bint, miraj, farewell haj prove this. Sahih M. Kitab iman says there is a barrier between Allah and creation. From Tauhid is Allah is separate from creation. Quran 20.46 shows Allah is with us Hearing and Seeing.

Dan deals with effects, not causes. He ignores bida which spIit the umma that helped non Muslims fight.

​@@abdebnadam6237 The external enemy is trying to erase us. No harm to ignore minor bidaas for a while now

Daniel is an Ikhwani

@@ponderingspirit1475 What is an ikhwani LOL 😂?

@@ponderingspirit1475 lool we're all ikhwanis, deobandis, Sufis, deviants, until we only follow select sheikhs from the middle East. If this is not a cult then I don't know what is.

@@irrelevant9424 They use that word to shame people who actually want unity in the Ummah.

Daniel the Lion. The only reason I would go to a conference like this would be because Daniel would be there.

Bro stop giving comment like this, we all see that they clarify thing that misunderstood and people has they own way.. at the end they manage settle thing in a good way... we shud make duaa that all muslim is must solidarity

Farooq dude knew he was in the wrong and tried to cover his tracks by portraying Daniel as the little knowledable guy , but in reality Farooq with his closed mindset tripped on his own gown ,. Daniel was a cool calm debater /collector who actually addressed indirect attack like a gentleman . Respect . Shows that Farooq actually has knowledge but will use to further his closed mindset .

He told him relax because Daniel started approaching the discussion as if it was a debate, replying in bad faith and accusing sheikh uthman of straw-maning him... how is this a proper way of discussion??? The second important point is that daniel is the one who requested this to happen.

​@@mnoorbhaiWords of absolute ignorance and naivety. Sheikh Uthman was trying to justify for Daniel why he was misunderstood. Saying you're a scholar is a huge responsibility, it's not a child's game. Daniel took it in bad faith as if sheikh uthman was degrading him, and S. uthman followed up by saying I'm not undermining your knowledge but clarifying to those that misunderstood your statements. And here you are saying the opposite. I can't believe that your love for daniel is blinding you like this! it's crazy.

@@Jaafar_Alkhalifa i think the shk was picking on Daniel who stayed cool and calm .

Wallahi it was disgusting

Daniel played it off cool though and with class 😂

​@@Crime_pays what'd he do?

@@Ibrahim.l20 I feel like he was almost making the man retake his shahada at one point 🤣

Fr that’s what I was thinking lol

Okay I'd like to get straight into topic. I've read many of the comments here and honestly, brothers what's wrong? Why are we trying to split each other up? What happened? I've watched this video thoroughly and I'd agree that Sheikh Kharim might have sounded like we was "ambushing" Daniel, but we got the necessary clarifications all of us needed no? Daniel talked about his stance and clarified some of the misconceptions behind him. Sheikh Uthman respected this conversation and he wasn't even planning for it to happen, but it did and they handled it well. Sheikh Uthman cleared up on the importance of where someone gets knowledge from and how if he is not a qualified scholar, that they must not spread their beliefs and etc until they are qualified. They talked about some of the people that teach wrong Qaeedas and all that but that's besides the point, I've seen many comments here where some people insult Sheikh Uthman for example, or say oh I'm never going to support this dude or that guy. Guys guys what's going on? Alot of misconceptions we're cleared up, we got background information about these intelligent men, and they discussed some of the dangers of an unqualified person spreading his knowledge. What you people are doing here is splitting the Ummah even further and your just simply making those islamaphobes and hypocrites even more happy. Brothers we should thank all of them that went up there, we love Sheikh Uthman, Skeikh Karim, Daniel, and the Sheikh at the right (I apologize in advance I'm not familiar with him nor do I know him, it's the first time I see him but he seems genuine and a good respectable person) and we should not spread hate between us. Your just making your enemies glad. I'll be copy pasting this onto many of the comments.

Love brother Daniel

@@mz6137 It doesn't matter how well this was handled, it doesn't matter how much clarification others get, this isn't a way to ambush someone. No props to Br. Uthman or Br. Karim. It was only because of Daniel's calmness, this didn't turn ugly. You always ask others to deal these in private? Where did that advice go? Asking Daniel to not to speak on certain topics just because some immature brothers of salaf(as said by Br. Karim) is fair? Since when? It's these neo salafis making thakfir, splitting the ummah and making others happy.

Why u scared to share your thoughts

Unfortunately this channel is anti-Islamic in its context. The name "ahnaf" is used to catch non-Salafis out. I've deleted any comments on this video and will not be watching anything else by this "creator", for the greater good of Islam.

Daniel is an Ikhwani

@@ponderingspirit1475 When everyone speaking common sense just seems like an ikhwani, that’s a sign that you should reevaluate where you lean.

@@Kimeikus We actually have to deal with this kind of retards, time wasters, boot lickers

Middle??? 😂😂😂😂

@@ponderingspirit1475 Here comes the madqali bootlicker

Sheer arrogance of nobody calling shaykhs "Self righteous"

It’s not arrogance mate, it’s that they care about Daniel’s akhirah, they want to ensure that he goes to Heaven, and on that he’s an extremely valuable asset in the fight against Liberalism, and a very knowledgeable individual, who has come under a lot of unwarranted criticism. Hence, they want to ensure that his Aqeedah is correct and that he is rewarded in the Akhirah for his hard work in this world! This is called love brother, if they didn’t love him, they wouldn’t have gone to this extent to ensure that everything is clarified.

@@Anonymous-rz6vq only naive would believe that

Shiekh Fahad well said

@@sheikhfahad2436 irony 😂

alhamdulillah he speaks the truth in front of everyone these cultists cant handle it.

Ameen ya Rabb, Daniel doesn't take any nonsense

Exactly!

Alhamdulilah

Yes because youth are emotional and unintelligent. Provocation, name calling, slander are the standard that they gravitating towards and those are the things Daniel brings to the table. Wisdom doesn't attract the youth. To them, rebellion based on ignorance and arrogance is charisma. Well, I guess fools will follow the fool because they're the only one they can understand and relate to.

⁠@@geniunerf4868😂 that’s a joke right ?

@@orwellianyoutube8978he’s a misguided individual.

Wrong. Aqeedah is always first. The prophet salallahualaihi wasalam propagated Islam to the idol worshippers to only worship Allah and Allah alone and to avoid Shirk. THIS is the true path to success

The main point is, some scholars are bootlickers. Brother Daniel is bringing light upon them.

Yeah the divide and conquer is devastating. Where I come from we were recently introduced to democracy. With it can two party system. Now it's a comedy here. Nothing gets done. His points are spot on for me. After western lifestyles came people lost their sense of community. Capitalism came in. Poverty is getting higher. Which leads to conflicts. Knowing your enemies really help and what might come.

@@56Circular So Aqeedah is definitely important , but that's not the major issue in the Ummah - the attraction to a Liberal lifestyle is a far greater trial as of now. Our effort should focus on the need of the times .

Thus a corrupt approach. The reason why liberalism affects us so much is because of our corrupt aqeedah

Not looking past - but putting our differences on hold - that is what he is saying

But how are far we supposed to go and accept the "diffrence" is it their fiqh or does it also include aqidah ?

sky is the limit. he can become the head of the islamic-community Hawaii _you name it_

He is definitely a heavyweight, an overweight guy who spends most of his time at home posting on social media

@@danishbhatt9116 I’m sure he can knock you out by mere touching you can’t touch muslims. begone troll

@@danishbhatt9116 Subhanallah, he is gaining your good deeds. Brother DH has achieved and pushed Islam forward far more than you could even dream of doing.

Daniel talking about gender roles and duties when all he does is stay at home and post on social media lol

Lol what were watching.he was weaseling like a weasel

Okay I'd like to get straight into topic. I've read many of the comments here and honestly, brothers what's wrong? Why are we trying to split each other up? What happened? I've watched this video thoroughly and I'd agree that Sheikh Kharim might have sounded like we was "ambushing" Daniel, but we got the necessary clarifications all of us needed no? Daniel talked about his stance and clarified some of the misconceptions behind him. Sheikh Uthman respected this conversation and he wasn't even planning for it to happen, but it did and they handled it well. Sheikh Uthman cleared up on the importance of where someone gets knowledge from and how if he is not a qualified scholar, that they must not spread their beliefs and etc until they are qualified. They talked about some of the people that teach wrong Qaeedas and all that but that's besides the point, I've seen many comments here where some people insult Sheikh Uthman for example, or say oh I'm never going to support this dude or that guy. Guys guys what's going on? Alot of misconceptions we're cleared up, we got background information about these intelligent men, and they discussed some of the dangers of an unqualified person spreading his knowledge. What you people are doing here is splitting the Ummah even further and your just simply making those islamaphobes and hypocrites even more happy. Brothers we should thank all of them that went up there, we love Sheikh Uthman, Skeikh Karim, Daniel, and the Sheikh at the right (I apologize in advance I'm not familiar with him nor do I know him, it's the first time I see him but he seems genuine and a good respectable person) and we should not spread hate between us. Your just making your enemies glad. I'll be copy pasting this onto many of the comments.

@@imsoniceee why the harsh criticism? I didn't hear him saying anything that sounded disingenuous. I've avoided him on KZfaq because of what others said. While I might disagree with some of his stances he didn't say anything indefensible.

@@mz6137 SubhanAllah I just wrote the same thing just much less eloquently. InshaAllah we are believers that recognize one another in this dunya and the akhira

@@jumatron2060Ameen and may Allah SWT guide us all

The fact you called it a debate shows how out of the loop you are. I can say the same about sheikh uthman and kareem or Ibrahim. This is not a matter of football teams and who you should cheer for. It's about knowledge in Islam and following the truth. Daniel is undeniably the least knowledgeable among them, they are just too respectful to call it out blatantly, but all three made general comments addressing the mistakes he fell in. Brother Daniel is doing amazing work in refuting modern liberal ideologies, but he must not overstep his boundaries of knowledge.

always knew he was a real one he is not a cultist like the others.

No, your view is like that because his answers make sense to you. Why? Because your knowledge and his knowledge are at the same level they relate to each other. Just like him, everything else flew over his head.

@@fullsendit292 just like him, you're name calling and labeling other muslims without proof. May Allah deal with you and Daniel.

yes

Daniel is an Ikhwani

@@ponderingspirit1475 And your evidence?

I don't think Daniel is strictly salafi, but he made sure to quote from scholars they see as authorities. Which shows wisdom

@@musti12312 I can’t admit or deny because he was a Shia so it would take a time to see his aqeeda in what manhaj

@mohammed ahmed hasan Idk if there are bots that are there to praise him or if they are so delusional they just ignored the discussion.

@mohammed ahmed hasan ameen

Daniel is A DISPICABLE LIAR...The Muslim can ONLY unite upon the TRUTH, NOT FALSEHOOD AND DEVIATIONS...

@@Jammylune how's he a liar?

@mohammed ahmed hasan okay? Give a reason for your statement

Spot on brother, because they bootlickers.

@@khaderlander2429 wow dont call sheikh utman ibn farooq bootlicker

@@BluetekFREEGAMES No need to call him a Sheikh either.

@@tmwuam you defend someone who insults a muslim that is a lion in dawah . who goes day after day giving dawah for free , has kids has work , teaches hadith . has a master on hadith ., he has my respect .

What? They wanted him to clarify some statements he said because the phones of Karim Abu Zaid & Uthman was going off like mad since Daniel said those things. That's the reason he's sat there. If anything it was a good opportunity to settle things. It may look like he's being interrogated but it's cleared the air up a bit

halloween

@@ummrawamus Correct

Salaamlakum

Nothing went down well. What you talking about akhi? Btw Allah bless br Daniel

@@kafakir Have you read it all? Or only fhe last sentence?

@@logicalson .

His decision to make daniel repeat the word is the one and real bridge ive seen in this video Daniel needs not to be humbled or whatsoever, its not like those words reduce him or humiliate him

@@asmrnaturecat984 SubhanAllah. Asking a Muslim da'ee whether he is a Muslim or not in front of hundreds (now millions) is normal for some people? Asking him to repeat the kalima as if he is a child or a non-Muslim shows something which is in and of itself derogatory and disgrace for not the one questioned but for the one who asks!

Uthman is no Sheikh, he's a self taught dawah boy who peddles scientific miracle nonsense

@@al-kimiya6962 Brother Al kimiya, If we see Past scholars of India , they shown even with the different in Aqidah they came together and established big institutions and for benefits of general Muslim Public. For example “Nadwatul Ulama” established by Scholars included Atharis, Asharis and Maturidis . They worked together as part of Ahlu Sunnah. That is what we required now by the Scholars. Even though I strongly accept that Athari creed is most correct and followed by the Four Great Imams without doubt. But we can not exclude Asharis and Maturidis from Ahlu Sunnah.

@@Bilal-BS I'm 100% with you on that and I'm Ashari-Maturudi myself, indeed we need to unite irrespective of our aqida differences against the onslaught of liberalism, feminism etc. I was talking about Uthman, he's no Shaykh, he's just another self taught dawahman and he's also a madhkali.

Forget debate. Lets deal with truth man. Ya’ll treating islam and debates and some entertainment thing.

@@user-ew1xu4wq4k Calm down . Don’t be emotional. Don’t straw man . Who said about entertaining. Similarly I can not say to you “lick some boots” why should I assume like that ? I said debate can Be disadvantageous too if you are not getting Truth . Allah knows best . And Leave Negative assumption.

Problem with these old people

​@@aspire7860 Problem with salafis

Why Sheikh uthman feel insult & angry very frequently.

@@dr.zisreligious let me guess, you're not a Muslim?

Sister milahan how are you

Farooq is a jaahil that poses a Shaykh, this wasn't a surprise

these people are very backwards. They can't tolerate any dissent, and I expect they will remove him from AIM soon.

Daniel is an Ikhwani

Associate with Wahabi dogs and get bitten …

@@ponderingspirit1475 يا ليل حتى عند مسلمي العجم تقولون اخوان ههههههههههههههههههه

The wisdom was in daniel not requested this discussion in the first place

Daniel is an Ikhwani

@@ponderingspirit1475 you’re a BOOTLICKER

Okay I'd like to get straight into topic. I've read many of the comments here and honestly, brothers what's wrong? Why are we trying to split each other up? What happened? I've watched this video thoroughly and I'd agree that Sheikh Kharim might have sounded like we was "ambushing" Daniel, but we got the necessary clarifications all of us needed no? Daniel talked about his stance and clarified some of the misconceptions behind him. Sheikh Uthman respected this conversation and he wasn't even planning for it to happen, but it did and they handled it well. Sheikh Uthman cleared up on the importance of where someone gets knowledge from and how if he is not a qualified scholar, that they must not spread their beliefs and etc until they are qualified. They talked about some of the people that teach wrong Qaeedas and all that but that's besides the point, I've seen many comments here where some people insult Sheikh Uthman for example, or say oh I'm never going to support this dude or that guy. Guys guys what's going on? Alot of misconceptions we're cleared up, we got background information about these intelligent men, and they discussed some of the dangers of an unqualified person spreading his knowledge. What you people are doing here is splitting the Ummah even further and your just simply making those islamaphobes and hypocrites even more happy. Brothers we should thank all of them that went up there, we love Sheikh Uthman, Skeikh Karim, Daniel, and the Sheikh at the right (I apologize in advance I'm not familiar with him nor do I know him, it's the first time I see him but he seems genuine and a good respectable person) and we should not spread hate between us. Your just making your enemies glad. I'll be copy pasting this onto many of the comments.

They all proved that the Madkhali curse is real

Coper? Are you a black piller ?

@@rocketbossgiovanni7487 Red, black, whatever. I’m familiar with them all and see the truth in all of them.

@@JamesBond-wv9xz may Allaah deal with you swiftly

@@JamesBond-wv9xz you dont speak for women, you chad worshipping shirkist.

@@rocketbossgiovanni7487 And may His Dealings with me all Be Blessings Granted upon me and His Favor Granted upon me. Ameen. May Allah SWT Guide us all and Protect us all and Keep us guided and Keep us Protected. Ameen.

Yet you're here watching it.....

It had to be settled publicly as it was a public issue.

You know that the main message and most important one is tawheed "Worshipping allah alone"? The rest of the panel is asking him to focus on that instead of criticizing the rulers of muslim lands, something that he has no preceding scholar to do before him.

Not so rare now a days to witness bootlicking stupidity as well

Lol it was the most uncomfortable conversation I've seen in a long time. They tried to ambush Daniel.

Thank you so much for this comment. inshAllah people have this way of perspective and thinking. Ameen (to the original comment)

It’s Daniel who’s trying to unite Muslims.m 38:58. The others were behaving like a cult. It was also distasteful that they tried to ambush the brother. But masha Allah he was humble and handled it eloquently.

@@mohamed-zy7iq it was definitely uncalled for to ambush like that but I wouldn’t go to an extreme and say cult. Daniel was very defensive and apprehensive when it was just about clarifying. That’s what turns this confrontation from a simple correction to what is now felt as an ambush. Leave the emotions out of it and they will come to the unified point much quicker. Daniel is great alhamdulillah but i just find him in general to lack perspective. This is not anything major and i think with wisdom this often times gets resolved. May Allah swt bless and guide us all. Ameen.

Super awkward lol

True

This would have been best of they have sit altogether before this event

@@bewiththetruthalways5637 this talk lit a fire under Daniel... He unleashed beast mode lol

More coming your way. For that's what islam is from the first shahabas.

Okay I'd like to get straight into topic. I've read many of the comments here and honestly, brothers what's wrong? Why are we trying to split each other up? What happened? I've watched this video thoroughly and I'd agree that Sheikh Kharim might have sounded like we was "ambushing" Daniel, but we got the necessary clarifications all of us needed no? Daniel talked about his stance and clarified some of the misconceptions behind him. Sheikh Uthman respected this conversation and he wasn't even planning for it to happen, but it did and they handled it well. Sheikh Uthman cleared up on the importance of where someone gets knowledge from and how if he is not a qualified scholar, that they must not spread their beliefs and etc until they are qualified. They talked about some of the people that teach wrong Qaeedas and all that but that's besides the point, I've seen many comments here where some people insult Sheikh Uthman for example, or say oh I'm never going to support this dude or that guy. Guys guys what's going on? Alot of misconceptions we're cleared up, we got background information about these intelligent men, and they discussed some of the dangers of an unqualified person spreading his knowledge. What you people are doing here is splitting the Ummah even further and your just simply making those islamaphobes and hypocrites even more happy. Brothers we should thank all of them that went up there, we love Sheikh Uthman, Skeikh Karim, Daniel, and the Sheikh at the right (I apologize in advance I'm not familiar with him nor do I know him, it's the first time I see him but he seems genuine and a good respectable person) and we should not spread hate between us. Your just making your enemies glad. I'll be copy pasting this onto many of the comments.

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/laihhq-SvMysaWw.html

100% agree, InshaAllah. Salaam

His success is not digested by the madkhalis.

How did he embararrsed himself? he was just trying to teach danail about some issues

@@user-ue4fh5mv9s it was pretty disgusting really, casting doubt on whole group of Muslims, borderline takfeering.

Yes he really embarassed himself alhamdulillah

Does he have anything to teach to anyone beside his arrogance?

What truth?

Saheeh there's differences between Deobandies

You've not come across that many then, they can be the most deviated of ppl on basic aqeedah principles. What can be expected from a movement started based on a place?

@@MarpoA your ignorance doesn't deserve a response.

@@MarpoA you clearly haven't been watching the video attentively.

@@MarpoA You need to get off the couch and burst your bubble.

Unit about the truth is the best way. MayAllah guide us to the right path.

Randkhalis are the enemy. Their whole purpose is to cause division in the ummah and stick up for kfr and muslim rulers.

@@orwellianyoutube8978 the prophet said the ummah will split in 73 groupe

That's not a lion he's a coward hiding in the west while speaking against rulers.. that's a joke

I lost respect for uthman after seeing that

You have missed all of his points. Think with knowledge and not with emotions

i did not see anything wrong here

Sheikh Uthman was really arrogant here and tried little down Daniel. The problem with these traditionalists are that they are so caught with old aqeedahs, manhaj and so busy pointing their opinions right that they sometimes become the primary cause of creating sects.

@@naseehatogurabaa9515 "old aqeedas". There is only ONE AQEEDA and it's the aqeeda the prophet alayhi salaam followed himself and taught it to the salaf. The problem is us trying to be shayookhs and imposing our own understanding of Islam without actually spending time sitting with actual scholars and studying it. Please repent of what you've said. May Allah forgive you and guide you to the straight path.

Daniel is an Ikhwani

@@ponderingspirit1475 And you're a walking L

it's not about anything he said here

@@someguy5063 then what did he say that offended people? Is it Saying that Halloween celeberations are haram and saudi govt shouldnt have allowed it? Whats wrong in that? Condemning haram acts is obligatory (heart, tongue, hands) whatever is possible.

@@hauntedgecko151 that's exactly what these people couldn't take: criticism of the Saydi govt. This whole conversation is a proof how Saudi is controlling these pseudo salafies

Daniel is an Ikhwani

@@Abdullah.......... criticising Muslim rulers for their sins in public is against the sunnah, if you followed the real Islam then you wouldn’t complain, learn your deen

Coz it would turn into a debate

@@MohOz It was a debate

Disagree. Infact he was reaffirming what Daniel said himself by saying effectively 'you, yourself have not claimed to be a scholar', this is actually a statement of support because for him to say he is is a problem, and he has never claimed to be.

They do ikhtilaaf with others freely AND when you do ikhtilaaf with them, most of them react with almost the takfeer, so do barelwis

Okay I'd like to get straight into topic. I've read many of the comments here and honestly, brothers what's wrong? Why are we trying to split each other up? What happened? I've watched this video thoroughly and I'd agree that Sheikh Kharim might have sounded like we was "ambushing" Daniel, but we got the necessary clarifications all of us needed no? Daniel talked about his stance and clarified some of the misconceptions behind him. Sheikh Uthman respected this conversation and he wasn't even planning for it to happen, but it did and they handled it well. Sheikh Uthman cleared up on the importance of where someone gets knowledge from and how if he is not a qualified scholar, that they must not spread their beliefs and etc until they are qualified. They talked about some of the people that teach wrong Qaeedas and all that but that's besides the point, I've seen many comments here where some people insult Sheikh Uthman for example, or say oh I'm never going to support this dude or that guy. Guys guys what's going on? Alot of misconceptions we're cleared up, we got background information about these intelligent men, and they discussed some of the dangers of an unqualified person spreading his knowledge. What you people are doing here is splitting the Ummah even further and your just simply making those islamaphobes and hypocrites even more happy. Brothers we should thank all of them that went up there, we love Sheikh Uthman, Skeikh Karim, Daniel, and the Sheikh at the right (I apologize in advance I'm not familiar with him nor do I know him, it's the first time I see him but he seems genuine and a good respectable person) and we should not spread hate between us. Your just making your enemies glad. I'll be copy pasting this onto many of the comments.

@@mz6137 it seems you did not see my other comments where i go into details of what's wrong. i did not insult shikh uthman not the shikh in the middle (sorry i forgot his name). in fact i even said that shikh uthman didn't know about this while the one who orchistrated it, the one in the middle as i am middle eastern living in the middle east, i can tell from his body language that there was no real maliciousness in what he was doing.... with that being said there was a high level of disrespect, the shikh in the middle did what the older generation do to kids to embaress them, he did not look at daniel as an equal or even someone in the samel field of work. as for splitting the Umah, are they not splitting the Ummah? have you not heard what daniel said? they want to join with people who are prob kufri rituals in action even though in words they say they are against it, they are against LGTV+ but activally work with them and give them a voice to influnce the muslims. on the other hand when it comes to aqeeda, most people don't even know the 6 simple pillers of iman much less care if Allah is on the throne and how he is on the throne. yet we all are affected by the LGTV+ propaganda, the liberal propaganda and so on. they were the ones pushing these shiukh to do this to daniel. they could have easily talked to daniel privately as they do have his contacts, do this conversation and then have a public conversation without any blindsiding to the public. most people who become religious to a degree of knowing their religion but still a layman, knowing the basics is good enough, the 6 articles of iman is good enough. frankly i do not care how Allah is on his throne, Allah said he is on his thron, khalas he is on his throne. it's as simple as that, those who want to argue back and forth they can argue, it's their own ishtihad as there is nothing in hte ahadith going into these kinds of details. what's between us and people is the quran and ahadith. when you work with these people and they tell you no allah is not on his throne physically, bla bla bla you say bring me from the ahadith or the quran that what you are saying is true, otherwise we take the apparent meaning. same for whdat alwujuud,how can we all within Allah and Allah within everything if Allah himself says he is not unlike anything else. plus you are basically saying Allah is in the dirty things in this world without going into details, it doesn't take long to make them understand. but if you cut those people off, their leaders will totally brainwash them so even something that is not logical will become logical to them.

@@PoeticSonic Okay I like your response. I'm from the Middle east myself too. I'd agree that the person in the middle might have seemed disrespectful, I would've just upright said Daniel you must clear your stance because of bla bla bla misconceptions behind you and all that and that would've been sufficient. He might've went overboard but I've seen some rediciolous comments here so I just copy pasted that comment everywhere. I saw people doing takfeer, swearing at these great Da3ees and Sheikhs, it really put a bad taste in my mouth. They all are great, they cleared up misconceptions, and even though one of them seemed disrespectful, we should not account for that one single bad part of this conversation but we should look at the overall picture and how this conversation had a net positive effect as it clarified alot of things. I'm really really upset to see people slander this great people, some people even pointed at me and called ma Kafir for that comment I sent, and called me a Salafi, Wahabi and what not. I'm a Muslim, I follow the teachings of The Quran, Sunnah, and the teachings of the great Salafs. Simple. We should all do the same. My entire point is that the people in these comments are going overboard at spreading rumors and doing takfeer.

@@mz6137 they are going overboard but it was due to these da3ees going overboard too. that's what happens when people feel like you are splitting the Umah of people doing day to day things right while joining in with the people that are corrupting us. btw some of the things they said and did goes against the salaf. they also take non muslim countries like egypt as muslim countries, they are muslim majority country, similar to tunis but it's a secular government. the supreme judge in egypt is christian, nothing in the law says that a non muslim can't rule if they were elected. the same with tunis that has offically separated the religion and state, more like is forcing islam to be something you only believe but not act upon. go actually listen to the taps daniel was talking about, all the great shiukh from al albani to uthaimeen, spoke very openly on this, they even went as far as saying there is no bai3a in this age. btw i'm from the opinion that is against rebelion first and formost and i'm somewhat against the way daniel does his critque not becuase he names names or not, that is just bs, but becuase it goes back to the basics of maslaha. and i believe that there is less maslaha with the way daniel does when it comes to the level of critique but that's just my person opinion it's not something i can call someone a kafir over. and these shiukh are going to the opposite extreme, they say daniel is living in one part of the world while saying things like that while people living i those countries are affected. the same goes for them too, these people are neutering the real dawah, they may be enjoying on good, but they are not forbidding evil, they are forbidding the forbidding of evil. they are just as bad if not worse. as someone from the middle east and i know you probably know this too, most the great shiukh are in jail and this isn't anything new and has been the case for as long as there have been islam after the death of the prophets and the 4 great khalifs. frankly with all due respect, shikh uthman mostly does dawah to christians and struggles with others, while in muslim countries we don't need dawah for christians we need dawah for "muslims". in fact even the dawah he does for christians he can't do in "muslim countries" if he was in egypt, he would have been taken straight to jail, many did even much more milder comparative religion dawah and got jailed for years and years. and these people want people who are able to do dawah from the outside yet reach those in the inside to stop doing that type of dawah. it's disgusting. i didn't even mention how they don't even follow their own rules, did you catch how the shikh said mubarak rather than morsi, he would rather take the fusaaak rather than one that is religious such as morsi beucase morsi was affiliated with the bortherhood, so to him the brotherhood is worse than the kufaar. and they see no problem with criticizing morsi even though he was a muslim leader. they have no problem with criticizing leaders in gaza becuase they were affiliated with the brotherhood but don't you dare criticize any leader of "muslim" and muslim countries who are allied with the kufar and many of whom are clearly just puppets. i guess in their eyes you can't be a real muslim leader unless you are a puppet to the kuffar. and you might say i'm going too far, but prove me wrong. do they not always shit on the palestinian resistance who ARE the leaders over muslim land for taking weapons from the only people who are willing to give them weapons, iran. yet we should stfu and not say anything when muslim countries take weapons from israel and even go on fun joy rides testing their new weapons on the people of gaza. as i said disgusting

brother Daniel was very gentle and humble. love him more

Okay I'd like to get straight into topic. I've read many of the comments here and honestly, brothers what's wrong? Why are we trying to split each other up? What happened? I've watched this video thoroughly and I'd agree that Sheikh Kharim might have sounded like we was "ambushing" Daniel, but we got the necessary clarifications all of us needed no? Daniel talked about his stance and clarified some of the misconceptions behind him. Sheikh Uthman respected this conversation and he wasn't even planning for it to happen, but it did and they handled it well. Sheikh Uthman cleared up on the importance of where someone gets knowledge from and how if he is not a qualified scholar, that they must not spread their beliefs and etc until they are qualified. They talked about some of the people that teach wrong Qaeedas and all that but that's besides the point, I've seen many comments here where some people insult Sheikh Uthman for example, or say oh I'm never going to support this dude or that guy. Guys guys what's going on? Alot of misconceptions we're cleared up, we got background information about these intelligent men, and they discussed some of the dangers of an unqualified person spreading his knowledge. What you people are doing here is splitting the Ummah even further and your just simply making those islamaphobes and hypocrites even more happy. Brothers we should thank all of them that went up there, we love Sheikh Uthman, Skeikh Karim, Daniel, and the Sheikh at the right (I apologize in advance I'm not familiar with him nor do I know him, it's the first time I see him but he seems genuine and a good respectable person) and we should not spread hate between us. Your just making your enemies glad. I'll be copy pasting this onto many of the comments.

Ikr!! This was so embarrassing, these oldies should do better.

Whats there to cringe here? It's only humility and nobody is an angel. Even if Daniel was right 100% of the time in the past, I don't see a problem doing this. Being too proud is a problem.

Fr fr

I think it was good, he clarified his position well and now people cannot slander him anymore.

@@muhjow Clearly you don't understand bootlicking mentality

Wahdatul wujood, tavizs and visiting graves are strawman issues, since they were misrepresented. Also DH is correct a deobandi may even be a liberal, modernist

🌈 There's a beautiful love story btw Qasim nanotvi and Rashid Ahmed gangoghi 😶 They publicly use to display their love..

@@NK236 OK and? there are similar stories of Maulana Rumi and Shams Tabrezi

@@musti12312 rumi ibn Arabi kafirs zindeeqs are equal to namrud firon ...

@@musti12312 rumi was bhuddist And ibn Arabi zindeeq was worst than polytheists...

What has UK got to do with this, not one of them is from the UK

You are a liar. Your books are filled with this nonsense. Ashraf Ali Thanwis boos and many others

I guess coz I'm from the UK jazakullahuhyr

Daniel is an Ikhwani

OK jazakullahuhyr

That's not how it works. Haq is not always pleasant. Learn before talking please

@@Jaafar_Alkhalifa may Allah guide you 😊

Okay I'd like to get straight into topic. I've read many of the comments here and honestly, brothers what's wrong? Why are we trying to split each other up? What happened? I've watched this video thoroughly and I'd agree that Sheikh Kharim might have sounded like we was "ambushing" Daniel, but we got the necessary clarifications all of us needed no? Daniel talked about his stance and clarified some of the misconceptions behind him. Sheikh Uthman respected this conversation and he wasn't even planning for it to happen, but it did and they handled it well. Sheikh Uthman cleared up on the importance of where someone gets knowledge from and how if he is not a qualified scholar, that they must not spread their beliefs and etc until they are qualified. They talked about some of the people that teach wrong Qaeedas and all that but that's besides the point, I've seen many comments here where some people insult Sheikh Uthman for example, or say oh I'm never going to support this dude or that guy. Guys guys what's going on? Alot of misconceptions we're cleared up, we got background information about these intelligent men, and they discussed some of the dangers of an unqualified person spreading his knowledge. What you people are doing here is splitting the Ummah even further and your just simply making those islamaphobes and hypocrites even more happy. Brothers we should thank all of them that went up there, we love Sheikh Uthman, Skeikh Karim, Daniel, and the Sheikh at the right (I apologize in advance I'm not familiar with him nor do I know him, it's the first time I see him but he seems genuine and a good respectable person) and we should not spread hate between us. Your just making your enemies glad. I'll be copy pasting this onto many of the comments.

@@mz6137who gave them the authority to question him in such manner, and from where he is getting his knowledge, there are thousands of scholars all over the the Muslim word, why only Saudis clerics always cited as a reference, and everybody knows who control Saudi Arabia and therefore the policies regarding the views of scholars towards the monarchy and power in general, there is a big picture needs to be looked at. The word is a small village run by the big powers including the interference into the people’s beliefs.

@@MrALFIEANGEL brother this is bs also in india we have ahal ul hadith, we quot ibn taymiah mubarkfori al albani who was in syria so what r u on about

@@MrALFIEANGEL and who gave Daniel the authority to speak what he said he should of shut his mouth and not went against Prophet Muhammad peace be upon him, hadith, In sha Allah, all you people be raised with Daniel since you love him more then the haqq of Islam and Allah and the Sunnah.

It's was kinda holsom

@@belkairsaiefeddine4944 wholesome*

Yes disgusting belittling people

Who?

@@MuhammadHosny0 Those fake shaiks!

If you don't like the mindset of sheikh Uthman and sheikh Karim then go look to madkhali followers for example. Sheikh Uthman and Sheikh Karim they are the most genuene trying to bring the ummah together, while trying to stick to the true Aqidah.

Exactly, these are just parrots of a Saudi propaganda trying to dominate the muslim ummah.

Okay I'd like to get straight into topic. I've read many of the comments here and honestly, brothers what's wrong? Why are we trying to split each other up? What happened? I've watched this video thoroughly and I'd agree that Sheikh Kharim might have sounded like we was "ambushing" Daniel, but we got the necessary clarifications all of us needed no? Daniel talked about his stance and clarified some of the misconceptions behind him. Sheikh Uthman respected this conversation and he wasn't even planning for it to happen, but it did and they handled it well. Sheikh Uthman cleared up on the importance of where someone gets knowledge from and how if he is not a qualified scholar, that they must not spread their beliefs and etc until they are qualified. They talked about some of the people that teach wrong Qaeedas and all that but that's besides the point, I've seen many comments here where some people insult Sheikh Uthman for example, or say oh I'm never going to support this dude or that guy. Guys guys what's going on? Alot of misconceptions we're cleared up, we got background information about these intelligent men, and they discussed some of the dangers of an unqualified person spreading his knowledge. What you people are doing here is splitting the Ummah even further and your just simply making those islamaphobes and hypocrites even more happy. Brothers we should thank all of them that went up there, we love Sheikh Uthman, Skeikh Karim, Daniel, and the Sheikh at the right (I apologize in advance I'm not familiar with him nor do I know him, it's the first time I see him but he seems genuine and a good respectable person) and we should not spread hate between us. Your just making your enemies glad. I'll be copy pasting this onto many of the comments.

I agree with you, but I think they did this in public because of the ummah to clarify things and the messages imam karim has been getting to remove Daniel from the conference, but the sheikh. believes Daniel is a gem.

@@mz6137 👍🏻

@@nubianqueen6700 👍🏻

agree, it make me sad and worry to watch this but we all know this Allah swt will to make this happen.. 😢