Hey me 23 and same

24, same

Man I wish I was your age listening to this. 49 and I feel only now I am starting to pull myself together and becoming wise.

16 here

26✌️

What % of Americans have ever seen, heard or read anything by Daniel S.? 5%? Probably less. There's a reason you'll never see him on CNN or any other MSM.

Schmachtdown > Hitchslap. I was waiting for a "Daniel Unleashed" video, and this might be the start of it. I'm totally going to steal your word.

Exactly

The part about the priceless tree is my favorite. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/pNxxla52nZPOiXU.html

Me too!@@pluribus

Semantic ontology. 😂

He has a job opening for his group listed on Linked in…in case youre inclined. 😌

Amen.

Daniel gives voice to my half-formed thoughts and uncomfortable feelings watching the mindless human amoeba superorganism devour its surroundings. His semantic ontology is a gift to humanity.

Though DS is brilliant and wise and foresighted, his world-view is limited by conventional reality, which may not be the whole of reality. He might start with the reality of cold fusion and possibly other transformative energy technologies that may be available to some elite plutocrats and military units. What of the claims of David Grusch that there are ET visitors and humans who have reverse-engineered their technology? I would like to see Daniel in conversation confront the reality of ESP. There are people who are channeling visions from our future and our past. Though these methods don't have the reliability of ordinary sense data, they carry actionable probabalistic information. These things are not part of conventional reality, but they may be part of the reality that makes the difference between a future for humanity and extinction.

This also converges with Iain McGilchrists assesment that we tend to overemphasize left brain narrow problem solving abstract model thinking to the detriment of the whole. While knowing much less when we are young we still feel more of the whole until the gametheory/incentive structure/moloch that dominates the system makes us disconnect more and more.

@@teiuq yes - thank you. This describes my own life trajectory. It’s reassuring that we can return once more to a more balanced and whole perspective as adults if we are able to ‘step back’ and regularly reflect on the larger ‘meaning of life’ questions - preferably while barefoot and with our hands touching a tree, the soil, moss, water or similar. Everything shifts. Gratitude and grief become one.

You might also like Charles Eisenstein.

“I don’t have the Stockholm syndrome with moloch” - could be corrected to “I believe myself to not have Stockholm syndrome with moloch, but will, continuously reflect looking for it within”

it might have felt intense because he seemed angry at times… im not sure i find this inspiring… im weary of anger

I was about to write more or less the same thing. I think I will. 😊

woa!! I thought the same TM and DS are sensei s of nature and wisdome

This

And 5 is generous

No. It's society operating on a different level. That's a problem.

Ultimate gigachad

I'd recommend focusing on the message and not get distracted by the technical aspects, for your own benefit. It is what it is, I'm happy it exists at all.

Exactly what Naomi Klein has been pointing out. Billionaire wealth jumped significantly during the pandemic.😢

The whole. A holistic approach. Buy land.

​@brookestabler3477 That's a bit simplistic. It works in the short term, but it isn't a long-term solution. Governments, that is the will of other people, can use force, via straight force or economic forces, like a higher land tax, to eventually make the owners or future owners unable or unwilling to carry the cost of owning that land. Someone eventually will be incentivized to turn the land into housing, or a mine, or whatever is most profitable for them, or the government, or the will of the community. The solution only works if the community and those with power in the government also understand and support it, and if those communal values are sustained over time.

@@nonyab3237 That's why I like the idea of no money. No profit. Community government.

Given the value of a tree, and how quickly they go down, I say again, buy land.

@@brookestabler3477 Private ownership is a major part of the problem Daniel described. Not to mention, your wishes are only obeyed during your lifespan, as long as you have the monetary resources to exert your will within a society through coercion. If you wanted to accomplish what you're trying to describe, you'd have to basically create a Vatican that teaches the worship of trees, and then leverage enough violence, tithing and cronyism to keep it going indefinitely. Highly impractical, likely impossible... abhorrently immoral. Also, there isn't any lie about trees that would be threatening enough to compete with the original Vatican's shtick.

Who or what is TZM?

@@nonyab3237 TZM is The Zeitgeist Movement (Lots of key insights in the movement) a good place to start is the Doc Zeitgeist Moving forward (On youtube). Hope it adds another dimension to your understanding of our current Socio-Economic climate & potential paths beyond it. 💡💡💡

​@@nonyab3237 Also, the guy who made the original TZM documentaries (Peter Joseph) basically did all these lecture presentations basically like Daniel has been doing on the podcast circuit recently; pointing out all the problems with modernity (many of which Peter learned through Jacque Fresco's TVP who learned it from Bucky Fuller's "World Game", etc.), and basically ever since he wrote his first solo book ("The New Human Rights Movement") has arrived at the same conclusions that Daniel has here. I also recently listened to a bunch of old and new David Suzuki, and he's on all the same sentiments. So someone has been carrying this specific torch for us since the 1800's, seriously. I love Daniel and all these other people I mentioned, but eventually in identifying the problem, they identified the solution; the likely impossible to implement solution. It's was called "NL/RBE", in the TZM. Daniel describes it slightly differently, but it's not a new idea, even though I have no doubt he came to his own conclusion. Anyone who studies and contemplates this stuff seriously enough arrives at the same epiphanies. There's also a new movement called "Solarpunk" as well (which is the spiritual antithesis to the "Cyberpunk" aesthetic / morality). All of these movements are describing different aspects of the same concept imho. So many people have basically made up their own lingo to communicate concepts that our present society is oriented to suppress even describing, let alone imagining; completely forbidding building. This is the challenge now... clarifying what doesn't work (Capitalism, Accelerationism, etc.) and why. Then building models of something that has a better shot at working on a global or even multiplanetary scale, so we can prove a way forward, if it's even possible.

Natural Law Resource Based Economy.

How well do the WEF economic models look after those in poor communities? Someday those will just be described as communities and the egomaniacal collectors of earths resources will live among those communities or they will be outcasts with little to no useful way to contribute to the whole.

Also, there is much room in this new whirled for investments into what the game plan is today, and that is, for example, every province, state and municipality today has a game plan for distributed water sourced heating and cooling which is also known as geothermal heating and cooling though that's an inappropriate name where the application relies on flowing water through the ground so ground source or water source are both much more accurate names for these types of heating and cooling methods, but no matter the laws have changed, and they have changed in favor of non-fossil ... everything, actually.

hahaha ... because i can kzfaq.info/get/bejne/hbmfhsSn17XLlZ8.html

A tyranny can still fall under the banner "love"...

I think he’s saying - nature as guide not necessarily as god. Nature is a big complex system that has existed a long time and we would benefit by building with Nature- as a wholistic system available to us.

@@rustart sure, but is he also saying that nature has figured out third attractor dynamics? I don't know if it has. In all examples except consciousness, I only see first and second attractor dynamics. See my other two comments...

Wowza