thesuityogi no. Totally wrong and egotistical. Just fancy things... You say no identity and then leave your identity. Ironic. Hypocritical.

Hm.. What do you mean when you speak about " identity" ? Maybe that quest clears your mind. Have a nice day !:)

गीता में इसे अव्यक्त ब्रह्म (unmanifasted consciousness) कहा गया जिससे सृष्टि का सृजन और जिसमें सृष्टि का लय होता है। परन्तु उसमें इससे परे भी एक परब्रह्म परमात्मा बताया गया है जो ना कभी जन्म लेता है ना कभी मरता,जो सृष्टि से पहले भी था और सदैव रहेगा।।

Swansen03 what he meant is: even that cloud of atom, energy, dark matter whatever it is, where does they stay, what holds them? It’s nothingness. Like Sadhguru said in earlier days, “water doesn’t hold ocean, ocean holds water. Similarly, earth holds ocean, this galaxy holds earth.” Likewise those dark matter doesn’t hold the universe. It’s this vast nothingness which holds them. That’s what he meant

He didn't mention dark matter or dark energy did he? Empty space isn't either of those either by the way (when it comes to Physics) and nothingness itself has nothing to do with any of the physical concepts that you mentioned. If this seems like semantics to you you're thinking in the wrong direction. You can't even begin talking about "nothing", much less define it, so it's very easy to get lost in "semantics". But regardless, no structure is not a non-structure and thus a structure. With that route you are the one getting caught up in semantics (which again, is almost inevitable given the nature of the topic). It simply isn't something that even Mathematics can deal with, much less something as tangible as Physics (empty space, dark energy, dark matter and what not are all something). The moment you try to even imagine nothing you're already creating out of it. And that's where you're getting lost, by equating the product of nothing with nothing itself. It's one of those things that are so blatantly obvious that you either won't believe it if somebody told you or just wouldn't think about it anymore. Not sure if any of this will help in any way, but I figured the whole nothingness nonsense out while doing Mathematics (in the West), so I didn't even know this was an "Eastern concept of nothingness" to begin with. It may or may not be useful to you to just try to define nothing or to think about the implications of nothing despite not being able to define it.

Sugam Bhusal. Mmm.. but I already covered that, no, the 'anti-matter' IS 'nothingness' and is whats holding everything together. In my understanding, you can say consciousness instead of nothingness. We are understanding consciousness gives rise to structure, instead of other way around.

Nal. I'm using these terms in my own understanding, intuitive knowing granted by spirit. Thats how the truth is known, given by the truth itself. I don't actually know how science defines 'dark matter' but I do know the 'empty space' is not empty space. However, i believe I'm using consciousness and nothingness in the same concept ----edit See, viewing this while having a perspective that is confined to the 3rd dimension makes its difficult. The best interpretation the human mind can come up with is 'nothingness'. Which dawned on me, i understand that use here, but I do not think my perspective is being understood.

Swansen03 even the anti-matter is made up of something (some combinations of quarks. Can’t explain deeply here and I hope you know that as well) The nothingness explained here is not made up of something. It neither has any beginning nor any ending. It’s eternal.

pure chance

Arbind Sharma if something needs to happen it cannot happen without something else... Just like sadguru said only something can hurt u... in same way only something can create something... how can nothing create something which means is that nothing which is not but still exists... which means awareness exits even in nothingness does that mean the awareness is me or is it god.. If u say there is only one inside then am I the only one everywhere and anywhere am I god if I go into nothing?? Too many questions 🤔

It's better if u simply live our life and be less technical then we will be happy... Let's be technical where needed 😁 Sometime Sadguru confuses us... But sometime he make something's crystal clear...🙏

Arbind Sharma It's because some things should not be said and meant to be experienced as sadguru himself says atman soul and some words are curropted even this sentence will be curropted because we perceive something that which is not in our experience. What he is experiencing is his reality of life, I won't judge on what he said but after watching almost every video of his and even practicing in the path seriously I can say everyone has their own reality of life. So what he said may not be the truth to everyone. But the unchanged reality is itself change no one can stop from change, Change happens everywhere in the universe. This is the truth to everyone actually not that..

True .... We should at least try experience to though✌

In Ayn, chaos all possibilities are

Andrija Radica many think chaos is the same as disorder. In nothing, that is pure chaos, all possibilities. The cosmos came from chaos and nothingness, wouldn't it be more fitting that chaos is the answer and the creation is the answer?

Andrija Radica it went over your head :( I'm fine, always. Thanks for asking.

Andrija Radica bad vibe? From my picture? Well it says more about what is going on inside you than me. It's just a picture 😊

u r second I am first :P

Nitin Kumar bro I have proof😉

check again mister

Nitin Kumar stop fighting u lier I have a screenshot where 0 views are represented.... So stop fighting on such a small issue ...enjoy spirituality kid!

kid lol when u were busy taking screen shot my comment was already posted

But there is nothing..