Meh 😑

@@pyeitme508 artists got to eat.

There's an apparent contradiction in your statements. Concerning the "real life" example of the moths, at 3:58 you said that the darker ones were "less prevalent", which you then at 4:38 attributed to "random genetic mutations" as per the Darwinian evolutionary presumption. How can that possibly be, if the dark moth was already in existence as attested by your previous statement? The "problem" of the chicken and the egg only becomes a "problem" within evolutionary biology. It's not a problem for us creationists, who believe that God created the chicken, a variation within the "bird" kind, with the "seed" within itself (in wisely designed complex reproduction systems) so it could "be fruitful and multiply".. yet the chicken still needs the rooster to fertilize her eggs in order to produce chicks... Hard for me to simply believe that this was a "process" of "random" chance and mutations.. God bless.

@@samuelguzman5348 You're missing the fact that just because one moth is more successful and become more prevalent, it doesn't mean the other kind will necessarily vanish completely. In many cases a new evolutionary line will completely replace the old one by simply out performing it, but in others it will become a new sub-species where the original version still exists but may not be quite as common as the new, more successful one. This is the case with the moths where the white ones were more common until the environment changed extremely quickly and the black ones were suddenly more successful. This reversed again in an even shorter period when human's reversed the environmental damage. I won't spend one moment arguing your faith with you, but I will say that you can believe in God and still believe in evolution.

Life only comes from life.

All humans could see this process in nature too, and the unmistakable resemblance between humans and other primates. Darwin went farther with the speciation and common ancestry ideas.

Darwin also theorized that Africans were less evolved than their white counterparts. I personally reject the whole premise of evolution opposed to natural design.

Also about this time other branches of science noticed the world could not be only 6000 years old. The ideas of evolution had been presented before, but 6000 years would not have been enough time. When people understood how old the world really was, evolution became accepted. (Except in some parts of the US)

Quite right! and Darwin's 1st chapter was "Variation under domestication".

Common descent of all living things is not supported by anything presented here.

Thank you ❤️

Glad you like them! :)

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/oN9xh6hquNrGe2w.html

Oh no!

🤣🤣

Thanks! 🐰

It should be dinosaur/egg problem

True 🙃

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/oN9xh6hquNrGe2w.html

What have you done expect be a troll😂

​@@IBTU it's except 🙄

@@pyeitme508🎉 here is a congratulations on figuring something out

He is nearly correct, look at Larmark

The Catholic Church ⭕⛪ has its own de facto scripture, so...

Thanks!

That's not the chicken and the egg problem because those weren't chickens. Actually, it's not a problem, but a misunderstanding of the meaning of species because no ancestor would have been considered a different species from its immediate offspring.

I agree. Natural selection occurs of course. However, random mutations that are believed to provide genetic material for evolution, are a huge problem for the theory, since they are either harmful or just neutral (don't do anything). Genetic illnesses and cancer are prominent examples of harmful mutations.

The real quote is "Survival of the one most adaptable to change," which does admittedly flow back into circular reasoning. But fittest is an intentionally biased word coined and used by social darwinists, I agree.

Because the bible says that god created man, not god created apes that evolved into men - or more percisely, god created the single cell organisms that evolved into every living creature we see today.

Yeah, it seems I'm not the fittest as well but I go to gym and can bench 110😢

🐰

He's takin' abt who was first created, an egg or a hen.

A riddle that's not a riddle because the question makes no sense in the light of evolution.

@@tschorsch Sure it does. Did the first chicken hatch from an egg that was laid by and animal that was not a chicken, or was the first chicken born of a species that game live birth but in turned had an evolutionary mutation within itself the egg laying ability? The correct answer (imho) is logically the first option (as we believe all birds evolved from egg laying dinosaurs), but we have no real proof as of yet.

Essentially there really weren't many natural predators to the birds of paradise, so they never evolved traits necessary to use against predators, and developed bizarre plumage and weird mating habits. They did an experiment with Arctic Foxes. They took offspring and bred the aggressive foxes with aggressive foxes, and docile foxes with docile foxes. After many generations they found, the aggressive foxes became more aggressive, and the physical characteristics became more aggressive. The docile foxes on the other hand became more docile, and they developed less aggressive features, such as curly tails and floppy ears, there was no need for aggression so aggressive traits went away. Same with Birds of Paradise, except one happened naturally.

@@chrisclark784 with or without natural predators this diversity in morphology and behavior shouldn't exist, bright colors and energetic dances indicate the health of an individual and so they might develop crazy colors and dances but I don't see why one population would develop long head feathers while another chooses a blue smiley face on a cape, natural selection and sexual selection doesn't explain it

No, evolution has always been changes in populations, not individuals. Civilisations ending and reforming have nothing to do with evolutionary processes. Certainly, our technologies and geographical distribution have slowed down the evolution of the human population, but we're still evolving under Nature's laws.

While that is true in some ways, humans still evolve via natural selection and survival of the fittest - humans with genetic traits that makes them more resistant to disease/sickness will likely live longer and reproduce more than others. Modern medicine definitely "leveled the playing field" somewhat though, so it probably slowed the natural selection of the human species.

👀

Well, what was his reason?

​@@stephenmason5682 Taking God out of the picture, because proud free thinkers like himself couldn't cope with the fact there is a God that establishes rules for humankind's own good. He, and many other "thinkers" of their day, like Marx and Nietzsche, despized the influence of religion and God in society ( as if corrupt religions could ever be true spokesmen for God... ). Evolution was their answer to that. But as what they observed ( animals don't change into something other than what they are ) would not fit their narrative, the answer to that became time. "Well, you know, we don't see them mutating and evolving because this happened through billions of years." Obviously, this could never be proven or disproven, and so voila', they conceived the perfect and most convenient alibi to get rid of religion and God. This "billion of years" narrative goes on today. "The grand canyon was formed through billions of years", and yet the eruption of mount st Helens last century caused the same type of canyons, with it's defined layers, in just one afternoon. "The dinosaurs have million of years" and yet soft tissue was found in several specimens ( found by meanwhile cast out and discredited archaeologysts ) Because the desire to remove God from society increased exponentially in the "science" world, and "scientists" now became prostitutes to whatever agenda is paying them. Every ludicrous and insane theory is considered, but to consider an intelligent being created this perfectly designed world, now that's just unscientific...

@@armandolima823 A simple question asking what was the reason, and you spew out all this nonsense? Fact of god?

​@@armandolima823 I mean yes, the fact that a invisible man in the sky who also made cancer and some of the saddest species every known to exist is unscientific

Ikr!

The first chicken came from an egg that was laid by an animal that was not a true chicken, just like the first homo sapiens was born of a creature that was not quite a homo sapiens.

@@smgdfcmfah But was it a chicken egg?

@@UrsusPolaris01 It WAS a chicken egg, but it was NOT a chicken's egg.

@@smgdfcmfah Thank you, for sharing your wisdom in capitals.

@@UrsusPolaris01 You're WELCOME!

Yes, it demonstrates natural Selection. Do you have a point?

Expliquez s'il vous plait, ce que vous voulez dire.

We have seen beneficial mutations occur, including de-novo material.

@@thehowlingjoker I'd like to know a couple of examples of those mutations.

But who had the egg?😂

Except it's not. The fact that genes are spread regardless of how inferior they are is a product of our society and will likely be our eventual demise. Our species is getting weaker and weaker in many ways. In the human world, the less successful a human is the more likely they are to procreate (or procreate more often).

@@smgdfcmfah 3000 years ago we were much worse in overall terms. In this time period the gene revolution was very small but the civilizational revolution was huge.

@@PedroPortelareis Exactly. Now the earth is overpopulated and we're struggling to find a balance with nature without destroying it. The sharing of information, food and wealth is ultimately a negative thing as there is never a balance. People starve in part of the world because the local ecology can't support them, so we feed them from another part of the world where there is an abundance. Worse is the fact that technology is shared at such a rate that few people know how anything works - and NO one knows how everything works. 3,000 years ago a person could leave his city, move out into the countryside and live pretty much the same way he did before because he knew how to build a shelter, a fire, hunt, farm etc. Even if he wasn't an expert at all of it, he'd learn as he went. Today most city people wouldn't last a week in the wilderness, but more importantly, if part of the machine breaks down, they have no clue how ANYTHING works. This is unsustainable, to say the least.

Genes are everything

Those are also affected by natural selection...

No. if so you wouldn't have extinctions. Good example is the Irish Deer.

No not really, evolution isn't a conscious choice

@@meatchips4936 Mostly! There are 1000s of dumb evolution examples,The human spine, Nerve for the larynx going down the neck, into the chest, then back up the neck, especially silly for the giraffe. You could argue sexual selection is a conscious choice?

@@MarkUKInsects evolution doesn’t state that extinction won’t occur.

It’s changed quite a bit over its 150 year run time. More mechanisms have been found and genetics have been discovered.

Interesting

God looks on the heart, man looks at appearance. You're not being biblically accurate

@StatiCRjm how so? The translation of "Days" for the creation we already know would be better written as "Periods," meaning times of indeterminate length. The order of creation described matches what scientists agree on, meaning the formation of the world, then the land being divided from the sea, then the appearance of the heavenly bodies (easily matches when the Earth's atmosphere would finally be clear enough to see the Sun/Moon/Stars), followed by the creation of plant life then Animal life and finally culminating in Man who was "created from the dust." Now if I were Moses who was watching all this and saw the process of single cell organisms being made into man, I too would probably say it was dust. Don't presume to know my faith. What I have said above is merely my own conjecture and ultimately whether I'm right or wrong has zero bearing on my belief in Christ as the Savior of the World.

Never? You're lucky

@@RoxRock4ever and you're just another ignorant

That’s not how life works

This life is sucks and very fucking bad

🐔💭

It depends on the question. The question is too vague.

Liar

Observation sorts it out. There were eggs before there were birds. Bird evolution is clear in fossil record and in genomes and indeed in taxonomy. So, the issue is resolved. The egg was first. Birds came later. Chickens came even later again.

@@ozowen The question here: Who found the egg?!!!!!.... There are two possibilities. The first is that she created herself by herself Or something else create it First: If it had created itself by itself, this would follow from it The meeting of the two opposites is impossible, because in the state of nothingness it had power....How can it be correct in the mind to describe the non-existent with power?!!!... This is mentally impossible If I find something else... Who is he?!!... Let's look for him Thank you

@@muhemmdmostafa4029 No, sorry. There is nothing in that lot that is difficult. There was no created creature. The creatures that came before the ones who could lay eggs were simpler creatures. I'm not sure you quite understand how this works. We have creatures on Earth- in fact the majority of creatures on Earth are simple ones. They don't lay eggs. they don't have sex. They self clone. However, some of that lot can also merge with others to do something like sexual reproduction. Indeed, there are many creatures on Earth right now that can reproduce asexually, but have the choice also to reproduce sexually. None of this is impossible- it happens right now.

@@ozowen _Your Saying(No sorry. Thank you, sir. I would like to draw your attention to a matter which is, In this context, I am not interested in knowing how creatures came to be. What matters most to me is who created them?!!!..... _ Your statement (We have creatures on Earth - in fact the majority of creatures on Earth are simple creatures. They do not lay eggs. They do not have sex. There are many creatures on Earth today that can reproduce asexually, but they also have the option to reproduce sexually) Notice that you re-explain how creatures are found, and I do not care about knowing their reality at this stage of theoretical thinking, even if the method is cloning or something else. It is nothing more than the fact that our knowledge of how to unite is nothing more than, What is the method of reproduction? You would like to notice that there are four existential ratios in existence, which are: 1_ The proportion of the event, i.e. the occurrence outside the mind 2_ The ratio of mind, that is, mental thinking about the fact that creatures exist 3_ Pronunciation ratio, that is, its expression using the language in which it is spoken 4_ The ratio of the number, that is, writing about it in books.... The focus of my talk is about the existence of creatures, where did they come from?!!!... In the first place the mind always asks this question Who created these materials that are the elements of created things?!!!. Then we move to the second place, which is the search for knowledge of its facts through experimental science. The question here Is the meaning I want to convey to you clear?!!!... Sir, do you understand what I want to ask you in terms of knowledge?!!!!.... Thank you

@@muhemmdmostafa4029 "What matters most to me is who created them" OK, so you are wanting to talk about a deity. I am talking about the science and only the science If you want to twist the subject to a different one to that which you proposed of which came fist, the hen or the egg? Not interested. Have fun.

Troll

How was the earth formed with ANY creator?

how do you think the world was created@@DenisK21

if u think big bang, so i had a stone and a window i was bored so i threw the stone at the window and it formed an iphone 6 than many years later it evolved to a iphone 14. so does that sound right?

@@raufkhadra907 No, it sounds deliberately wrong in every possible way. Now put that tangential straw man back where you found it and actually answer my question.

@@DenisK21 listen son, your just angry because thats how you sound when you explain big bang and evolution 🤣 your supposed to tell me how my example and your theories are different and why you dont believe how my phone appeared

A fish turning into a chicken would disprove evolution. Your ignorance is not an argument. Since you don’t understand the science here what is your alternative? What is the evidence for it?

Well aren't you special. Which discipline of science do you want to get into. Answer one of these questions correctly I'd be surprised. First find out the 10 basic needs of Boys and Girls. Then recognize you're nothing more than a product of your own environment. So if any of you enlightened people including the person that posted this. Answer these questions or set down Shut up You're not special. I will send a series of questions if you want to answer them you can. Or maybe some of your followers. 1. What is irreducible complexity. And what did Charles Darwin have to say about it and his theory of evolution. 2. Where does Consciousness come from. Not what is consciousness. 3. Using quantum physics where does energy come from. Not what energy is. 4. Explain to me how a simple protein is formed just one protein. Then a protein strand. How the molecules are able to form and come together to make that strand with other molecules. That had to form and come together by communicating with each other without disruption. Using your primordial soup Theory. Understanding all the other variables involved that would have to happen over a consistent period of time. Or even at the time it was formed. 5. Explain to me why and how long it takes to form a rock and or a diamond. Knowing we can form a rock under pressure within 1 to 3. hours. 6. Explain to me according to the climate change experts. .004 % of our atmosphere is carbon monoxide. And only 20% of that is produced by all human activity. And why it's colder in the winter than it is in the summer. Even though we are closer to the Sun during the winter. With extreme temperature changes. Butt on the bottom half of the planet it's summertime. 7. Explain to me why the covid vaccine is not a vaccine. But it is gene therapy. And what is the difference. To present yourself as an intelligent person, with a superior Common Sense knowledge you must realize you're living in a glass house and throwing stones at other people. . Again some of the things you say are absolutely right. But a lot are misguided and wrong. One more question just for fun 8. How do they do carbon testing. And how do they come up with the numbers. Arbitrarily or factual. But remember a non-response from this host is a response. Which is what I expect. Anyone that wants to can is more than welcome look up and answer all these question. So you can understand who you are To a small extent And why you behave the way you do. It's not really that complex. Think about what A babies Basic needs are . It's no different for a boy or girl. Take away sexuality. For boys and girls, as they're growing up. We're talking about emotionally. And physical needs. Physical needs. 1. eat & drink 2. Breathe 3.sleep, 4. wear clothing 5. housing To protect us from the environment we're in. That is whether you're a boy or a girl. It doesn't matter. What are our emotional needs. For both boys and girls. It's absolutely identical. 1. Affection 2. Intimacy 3. Acceptance 4. Feeling safe 5. Emotional bonding with the opposite sex Boys and girls are two halves of the whole. That is where sex and sexuality join as one. Each one has a strong part to play. Both are equally important to build a strong union, Sex and sexuality is the cherry on top. Through that we bond with each other. And the better it is the stronger the bond. Each person you sleep with or become sexually Intimate with. You bond with for life. They become a part of you and you become a part of them. Your problems become a part of theirs and their problems become a part of yours. Think about it truly and Honestly before saying no, that's not true. Then it comes down to social and environmental constructs. Those are the environmental and and social influences That shape. How we act in the society were in. So basically if society said all of us should run around naked tomorrow environment willing. We would. At least eighty to ninety percent of us. Do to our emotional And physical needs Thank you for your time; Barry E, Ives.

@@rickdelatour5355 Well aren't you special. Which discipline of science do you want to get into. Answer one of these questions correctly I'd be surprised. First find out the 10 basic needs of Boys and Girls. Then recognize you're nothing more than a product of your own environment. So if any of you enlightened people including the person that posted this. Answer these questions or set down Shut up You're not special. I will send a series of questions if you want to answer them you can. Or maybe some of your followers. 1. What is irreducible complexity. And what did Charles Darwin have to say about it and his theory of evolution. 2. Where does Consciousness come from. Not what is consciousness. 3. Using quantum physics where does energy come from. Not what energy is. 4. Explain to me how a simple protein is formed just one protein. Then a protein strand. How the molecules are able to form and come together to make that strand with other molecules. That had to form and come together by communicating with each other without disruption. Using your primordial soup Theory. Understanding all the other variables involved that would have to happen over a consistent period of time. Or even at the time it was formed. 5. Explain to me why and how long it takes to form a rock and or a diamond. Knowing we can form a rock under pressure within 1 to 3. hours. 6. Explain to me according to the climate change experts. .004 % of our atmosphere is carbon monoxide. And only 20% of that is produced by all human activity. And why it's colder in the winter than it is in the summer. Even though we are closer to the Sun during the winter. With extreme temperature changes. Butt on the bottom half of the planet it's summertime. 7. Explain to me why the covid vaccine is not a vaccine. But it is gene therapy. And what is the difference. To present yourself as an intelligent person, with a superior Common Sense knowledge you must realize you're living in a glass house and throwing stones at other people. . Again some of the things you say are absolutely right. But a lot are misguided and wrong. One more question just for fun 8. How do they do carbon testing. And how do they come up with the numbers. Arbitrarily or factual. But remember a non-response from this host is a response. Which is what I expect. Anyone that wants to can is more than welcome look up and answer all these question. So you can understand who you are To a small extent And why you behave the way you do. It's not really that complex. Think about what A babies Basic needs are . It's no different for a boy or girl. Take away sexuality. For boys and girls, as they're growing up. We're talking about emotionally. And physical needs. Physical needs. 1. eat & drink 2. Breathe 3.sleep, 4. wear clothing 5. housing To protect us from the environment we're in. That is whether you're a boy or a girl. It doesn't matter. What are our emotional needs. For both boys and girls. It's absolutely identical. 1. Affection 2. Intimacy 3. Acceptance 4. Feeling safe 5. Emotional bonding with the opposite sex Boys and girls are two halves of the whole. That is where sex and sexuality join as one. Each one has a strong part to play. Both are equally important to build a strong union, Sex and sexuality is the cherry on top. Through that we bond with each other. And the better it is the stronger the bond. Each person you sleep with or become sexually Intimate with. You bond with for life. They become a part of you and you become a part of them. Your problems become a part of theirs and their problems become a part of yours. Think about it truly and Honestly before saying no, that's not true. Then it comes down to social and environmental constructs. Those are the environmental and and social influences That shape. How we act in the society were in. So basically if society said all of us should run around naked tomorrow environment willing. We would. At least eighty to ninety percent of us. Do to our emotional And physical needs Thank you for your time; Barry E, Ives.

@@barryives4916 bro how did u type a para bruh