Why You Want a Trimaran: Pros and Cons of Trimarans

  Рет қаралды 221,753

DMS | Marine Consultant

DMS | Marine Consultant

Күн бұрын

Three hulls are better than one! The trimaran hullform bridges the gap between monohulls and catamarans. It offers some advantages of both deadweight capability and larger deck area. Primarily, trimarans deliver ship stability in a very power efficient package. Recognize the potential applications by understanding the strengths and weakness of the trimaran hullform.
View more tips and helpful articles at www.dmsonline.us/
REFERENCES
[1] M. Hanlon, "U.S. Navy Orders a Second Trimaran Littoral Combat Ship," New Atlas, 21 December 2006. [Online]. Available: newatlas.com/go/6651/. [Accessed 4 Apr 2018].
[2] Defense Industry Daily, "LCS: The USA's Littoral Combat Ship," Defense Industry Daily, 20 Mar 2018. [Online]. Available: www.defenseindustrydaily.com/.... [Accessed 05 Apr 2018].
[3] R. Lamb, "High Speed, Small Naval Vessel Technology Development Plan," Carderock Division, Naval Surface Warface Center, NSWCCD-20-TR-2003/09, Bethesda, MD, May, 2003.
[4] Naval Technology, "Triton Trimaran," Naval Technology, 05 Apr 2018. [Online]. Available: www.naval-technology.com/proj.... [Accessed 05 Apr 2018].
[5] Aker Maritime, "Aker ARC 131 Trimaran Harbour Icebreaker," Aker Arctic, 2014. [Online]. Available: akerarctic.fi/en/references/co.... [Accessed 05 Apr 2018].
[6] willoh, "Pixabay," Pixabay, 01 Nov 2017. [Online]. Available: pixabay.com/en/trimaran-super.... [Accessed 5 Apr 2018].
[7] Wikpedia Contributors, "Trimaran," Widipedia, The Free Encyclopedia, 31 Jan 2018. [Online]. Available: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trimaran. [Accessed 05 Apr 2018].

Пікірлер: 402
@davidcummings74
@davidcummings74 5 жыл бұрын
I Use to work on the Triton. From memory it was almost 2000 ton and 100 meters long It was a diesel electric propulsion with a max shaft power of 3.2 mw It was fuel efficient for its size using 8 ton of fuel a day at efficient cruising speed of 12knots fully loaded. With a light load of fuel stores and crew on a load test we managed to squeeze out 22 knots from her another feature is that she is made of thin plate high tensile steel. By the way it was not the most comfortable vessel to be aboard in weather she even bob side to side in glass conditions and corkscrewed badly when the swell was on the quarter. When the waves hit between the hulls its like a bomb going off. I feel the side hulls should have been extended further aft. Not a good comfortable sea keeping vessel. But had its advantages in fuel efficiency.
@edward1005
@edward1005 3 жыл бұрын
Just discovered your channel, Nick, and I am so impressed by the depth and attention to detail in your videos. I've been a sailor for over fifty years and an engineer for more than forty and it seems like you have a lot of first-hand practical experience on top of some spooky good engineering skills. Yes? I've spent a lot of time on all three hull forms, coastal and bluewater, and I think your take on trimarans is spot-on. Out of all of my boats over the years, I have to say that my tri was my favorite. I'm pretty sure I need to buy or build another one and get back out there. Really appreciate your channel, Nick. Thank you.
@zbigkozak
@zbigkozak 3 жыл бұрын
Great explication! I am convinced. I will use it for working vessel to help Amazon River communities in need.
@mikedooly7288
@mikedooly7288 4 жыл бұрын
Thank you for this series. I have learned so much and love your lectures.
@KartiacKID
@KartiacKID 4 жыл бұрын
Thank you for your awesome video which have been teaching a lot about my sailing passion as a fellow engineer that loves getting nerdy in the design aspects even if I’m just an electrical controls engineer and not a mechanical design engineer
@memox909
@memox909 5 жыл бұрын
Dragonfly trimarans is another level with folding amas, they’re superb !
@It-b-Blair
@It-b-Blair 3 жыл бұрын
Corsair had the first folding design, and the new Rapido also folds. Several custom trimarans also fold. The trailer-ability, and low slip fees are sooo good!
@jckirby7994
@jckirby7994 5 жыл бұрын
Good post Nick...CAN'T WAIT UNTIL NEXT TIME
@ccronn
@ccronn 6 жыл бұрын
Always informative and insightful. I learn something in every video, thanks!
@jakewilliamson8906
@jakewilliamson8906 Жыл бұрын
I'm currently building a cutter ketch rigged sailing trimaran! Thanks for your support!
@lindasanson3094
@lindasanson3094 3 жыл бұрын
Truly informative- changed my mind entirely about catamarans as a preferred design
@timothyhoward5785
@timothyhoward5785 2 жыл бұрын
When I worked for Honolulu ship yard. We built a vessel named Slice for lockeed Martin, 105 long 55 foot beam, nic
@bigbpdx
@bigbpdx 3 жыл бұрын
I was hoping you would do a direct detailed comparison between trimerans and catamarans.
@jefffinley1303
@jefffinley1303 2 жыл бұрын
That was deep !Great vid great info thanking you sir U deserve a million likes
@viarnay
@viarnay 3 жыл бұрын
That Fred Olsen trimaran is a must. i have travelled a lot in it and it is awesome :- D
@larryboles629
@larryboles629 4 жыл бұрын
Thank you Nick, most informative.
@BrianSmith-oc8vk
@BrianSmith-oc8vk 5 жыл бұрын
Thank You, I learned something.
@rock3tcatU233
@rock3tcatU233 5 жыл бұрын
A clear and concise explanation, thanks a lot! The whole stability advantage could play a big role in designing a offshore mobile space launch platform, just like the one used by the Sea Launch corporation.
@charonstyxferryman
@charonstyxferryman 4 жыл бұрын
A launch platform would likely has one oil-rig type of "leg" - some 12 meters deep filled with water. Very stable due to a lot of inertia, which means that the platform don't move very easily.
@ERICWAGNERSLUCID
@ERICWAGNERSLUCID 2 жыл бұрын
Well done! Very coherent and easy to understand.
@lubos4639
@lubos4639 3 жыл бұрын
Definitely learned a lot... Thank you Nick :-).
@richardgould-blueraven
@richardgould-blueraven 6 жыл бұрын
Really digging the channel
@Cryptoversity
@Cryptoversity 3 жыл бұрын
I'm in love with the Neel 43 and 47 (or the older 45)
@johanmarais9950
@johanmarais9950 2 жыл бұрын
Excellent video
@MrRourk
@MrRourk 6 жыл бұрын
Talk about the benefits over a cat like POUNDING! No Daggerboards to break off. Usually better protected rudder and props. Considerably harder to flip over. Plus that sporty heel so you feel like your are sailing.
@ddouglas1653
@ddouglas1653 4 жыл бұрын
I realize this was posted a while ago however i hope you can shed some light on trimaran, monohull and catamaran characteristics in a heavy sea. Perhaps getting into beam seas at least. I'm of a mind that a BALLASTED center hull on a tri would achieve the greatest stability over a catamaran in say 15'-20' seas. Maybe a revisit to the subject would be a great addition. Tnx!
@jeffbybee5207
@jeffbybee5207 2 жыл бұрын
See the book by Jim brown on trimaran
@likbronangperahufiberglass
@likbronangperahufiberglass 3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for ur video ...👍
@russelpasamontehabla
@russelpasamontehabla 4 жыл бұрын
The basic design of trimaran is found in the Philippines. Boats with the so called "katig" (amas as you've mentioned it). This is a very stable design suited for major applications like fishing and transportation.
@seedsinsixtyseconds
@seedsinsixtyseconds 4 жыл бұрын
Whenever can I find the acantling numbers, charts, graphs, and formulas required for trimerans?
@666Hansen
@666Hansen 6 жыл бұрын
Dragonfly - a danish yacht builder - has been building trimarans for quite some years now, with great succes....very fast boats.
@brianjamesvayro2715
@brianjamesvayro2715 5 жыл бұрын
Do you work for/with 'Dragonfly family? envy !envy!
@dlawson688
@dlawson688 5 жыл бұрын
Great video
@MrClickbang357
@MrClickbang357 5 жыл бұрын
What comes to my mind is a design where one can still trailer sail yet have amas that fold up giving greater stability and can still fit on a trailer that doesn't need special permits (8.5' wide in the U.S.) to run on the highways.
@q.e.d.9112
@q.e.d.9112 3 жыл бұрын
Here ya go, mate. smalltrimarans.com/blog/seaclipper-20-plans-now-unleashed/ Jim Brown is a trimaran legend. And he rates it, so it’s good. Search Seaclipper 20 on utoob for video. Well, better late than never, eh?
@Dave_Sisson
@Dave_Sisson 6 жыл бұрын
The thumbnail had a photo of the 127 metre Austal trimaran ferry in the Canaries, but there was no mention of ferries in the video. There has been some debate about the merits of fast cat ferries v. trimarans, so I was hoping the subject would be covered. :(
@metalchilly
@metalchilly 4 жыл бұрын
Hello! Great videos, really educational, especially for design students looking into boat design, like myself. I'm planning on prototyping a mainly motor-powered yacht, but with sailing capabilities, be it a kite sail or some other sail type that DOES NOT require a full "static" mast (telescopic mast or some other way of anchoring the kite sail). I'm wondering if, given the way in which a kite sail is pulling the boat, the trimaran is the best hull type for this? Also, would you think it is possible to have this kite sail pulling the ship through waves, as it would feature a wave piercing bow, or is it just my imagination thinking that's an amazing idea?
@joaomercado3220
@joaomercado3220 5 жыл бұрын
please do a video of catamaran sea behaviour, load distribution, hull design etc.
@It-b-Blair
@It-b-Blair 3 жыл бұрын
I found this looking for sea condition comparisons. It would be great to see!
@quillmaurer6563
@quillmaurer6563 5 жыл бұрын
For sailing especially, trimarans seem like the best design, combining the best of monohulls and catamarans. The stability of a catamaran and the center hull of a monohull - having a center hull has a lot of advantages. This is true on both the small- and large-scale, if I ever had a sailboat (I live in Colorado, very far from any large body of water, so owning such wouldn't make a ton of sense - but a surprising number of people have boats here for some reason), anywhere from a skiff to a yacht, a trihull would be my ideal approach. For a large sailing merchant ship - an idea that would be really interesting in the era of composite materials, computer-controlled automated sails, and climate concerns - a trimaran again seems like the best approach. The amas provide far better stability and performance than a monohull when sailing, allowing greater sail area per weight and not needing a heavy and/or deep keel, while also allowing for more slender hulls. All the fastest sailboats nowadays are multihulls, most trimarans. For cargo or passengers, a monohull's tendency to heel over on a beam reach would be disadvantageous, or at least unsettling. A trimaran has advantages over a cat of having a central hull - this allows for not requiring duplication of equipment, mainly rudders and engines, as needed with catamarans. (Though there still would be the option of putting engines in the amas to provide more maneuverability through differential steering as seen in catamarans, trimarans have the option of doing either.) The center hull provides space for cargo or passengers, always a problem for catamarans, especially for sailing where a high-profile superstructure is disadvantageous. Same is true for small yachts, catamarans' lack of a central hull makes cabin volume a challenge. The center hull also provides a better place to mount masts. The drawback of a trimaran for any of these applications - pleasure yacht or merchant vessel - is the far greater width, problematic for berthing or cargo loading/unloading. Always a drawback, but I still think it could have potential.
@HasbaraBuster
@HasbaraBuster 4 жыл бұрын
Search for a vessel called Avalanche, her home port is Pagosa Springs, Colorado (but I doubt she was ever there) She is a Hammerhead 54 a absolute beauty. There is a very good serie's of videos on KZfaq kzfaq.info/get/bejne/o52UjJupl7GRo40.html
@yanassi
@yanassi 2 жыл бұрын
Thanks. I’ve considered a small coastal vessel fir some future time. I noticed many newer boats having a (just learnt) axe stern. It seemed it would lessen pitching by cutting through rather than planning upwards. I like the trimarans to lessen rolling and flipping. The vessel that intrigues me most is the astus 22.5 as a beginner overnighter (after a sailing learning curve). Any thoughts on that personal vessel?
@HarvickOne
@HarvickOne 3 жыл бұрын
Thanks, this will help with my project to design a trimaran seaplane hull
@jerrymiller276
@jerrymiller276 3 жыл бұрын
I would suggest that any seaplane with single main hull and floats on the wings is a trimaran. Of course you could increase the size of the wing floats to make it more boatlike, but that will come at the cost of decreasing the performance as an aircraft, not normally the direction designers and operators are looking to go.
@davidmorrill2943
@davidmorrill2943 5 жыл бұрын
What are advantage of Monohaul and catamaran power boats? Thank yoi
@matthewjacobs141
@matthewjacobs141 5 жыл бұрын
Aircraft Carriers is the first class of ship that comes to mind that would benefit from a trimaran hull...IMO
@Interdiction
@Interdiction 4 жыл бұрын
Submarine ...More hulls = more ports for torps :)
@Smokeyr67
@Smokeyr67 4 жыл бұрын
If that was the case I’m sure that the U.S. would have made at least 1 by now.
@zackworrell535
@zackworrell535 4 жыл бұрын
@@Smokeyr67 You obviously don't understand the scale of Bureaucracy that exits in the Pentagon
@zackworrell535
@zackworrell535 4 жыл бұрын
Agreed. Outer Amas would also protect center hull from torpedos
@Cybjon
@Cybjon 4 жыл бұрын
Except you wouldn't have space for the hangers and workshops.
@finfanfifteen9659
@finfanfifteen9659 4 жыл бұрын
Interesting video but I think it leaves more questions than answers. Looking at blue water cruising, how would the tri perform with hulls that are more evenly distributed in their responsibilities (not all designs seem to have the amas "pulled back")??? That would seem to be a more stable ride but does it take away from the performance? Example: the larger Neel series have what looks like nice living space since the hulls are more useful. But, some other designs have motors in the amas which you seem to indicate they are expecting much heel action to be going on. What are your thoughts on these design parameters?
@KartiacKID
@KartiacKID 4 жыл бұрын
Do Trimarans still have a disadvantage in heavy seas causing more yaw roll over starboard or leeward waves similar to catamarans sailboats bc they want to stay parallel to the water surface compared to monohull sailboat? Where the monohull sailboat tends to mitigate yaw roll caused by waves do to a heavy keel keeping them balanced like a gyroscope, allowing the monohull yaw axis to stay relatively stable in rough seas with exceptions to sail wind gusts causing some yaw roll. I know the monohull has a good safety factor when high gust of wind pick up... the boat will pivot along the yaw axis, acting like a blowoff valve in a sense allowing the sail wind to bleed off a heavy gust without causing damage to the mast were the catamaran hull prevents this pivotal affect and usually results in damage to the mast or retention cabling. Yes I know high wind gusts can still damage monohull rigging and sails but it seems to absorb much higher gusts of wind with minor damages compared to multihull catamaran. What is the advantage and disadvantages from that sailing point of view in heavier seas when crossing oceans?
@johnleach7879
@johnleach7879 5 жыл бұрын
In these cat and tri programs, you've assumed blue water applications. However, in sheltered waters, life becomes more simple: Brisbane, Oz has used tris for streetcars for more than 20 years. The Brisbane River snakes thru town, making them a reasonable option.
@caby9311
@caby9311 2 жыл бұрын
I'm getting a 23ft trailor sailor but ide like a tri so I thought of adding 2,like hobie Odesys either side. Fold upwards or sideways. Then you can also have a quick relies and paddle them. Any advice would be welcomed.
@TC-yx1qt
@TC-yx1qt 3 жыл бұрын
As far as smaller recreational trimarans.. is it true that they can point closer to the wind so more of a straight line towards the destination and less tacking?
@MrRugbylane
@MrRugbylane 6 жыл бұрын
This guy is great ...
@dalejohnson9342
@dalejohnson9342 4 жыл бұрын
Motor Yachts are a good candidate for Tri-Hull design as most owners of Yachts want large amounts of stability while anchored or underway. Another use is for shallow water compared to a comparable ship. With a slightly larger Amul ( I hope I said that correctly) you can decrease the draft of the vessel and thereby go into some shallower areas than a traditional hull which will allow the yacht to reach some areas for water sports that a mono-hull vessel of the same tonnage and size would not be able to get into.
@q.e.d.9112
@q.e.d.9112 3 жыл бұрын
I envision a fairly lightweight, aluminium/composite vessel ~60m x 40m with an almost full width bridge deck, providing a two deck structure some 40m x 30m. As far as possible, the bridge would be built to provide aerodynamic lift helping to increase potential speed.The interior can be a boutique cruise ship, Scientific RV, Expedition ship, inter-island ferry or w.h.y. She (sorry, I’m an old salt and ships are always feminine) will have two sources of motive power: wind, using kites and electricity, using that 40 x 30 upper deck for solar, plus regenerative drive units whenever there is an oversupply of wind. Her load carrying ability should give her masses of battery storage. Depending on actual design and load requirements, I could see her powering upwind, Vmg in the mid teens, her fully automated kite initiating tacks at the push of a button and her prop putting kWs into her batteries. Then she turns on a broad reach and suddenly she’s up in the thirties. A couple of miles before her destination her kite is recovered and she glides effortlessly, silently and electrically to her berth where her bow thruster and 360° steerable, retractable, main motor manoeuvre her gently into place. The potential for very low carbon operations providing eco-educational cruises ought to be good, in my opinion. It would certainly be a selling point
@nigelha3699
@nigelha3699 5 жыл бұрын
great vid, thanks, for those interested in blue water sailing tris, look at Neel trimarans
@skipper1350
@skipper1350 3 жыл бұрын
Dragonfly
@Siskiyous6
@Siskiyous6 5 жыл бұрын
I am installing a diesel engine in one of Jim Brown's Searunner 31s. I am building a pod in the aft section to house the engine, like was done with sailing vessels when they first started powering them, the Sea Bright skiff has a structure like that. I expect truly awesome fuel economy using a 20HP Saab diesel with a CP propeller. Jim Brown himself has told me he hates the idea, so no technical help is available
@seedsinsixtyseconds
@seedsinsixtyseconds 4 жыл бұрын
What's keeping someone from using 18 foot hobbie cat hulls as outriggers on a monohull sailboat six foot out from the side. Like how the south Pacific canoes are outriggers but on both sides not just one.
@williamscott2704
@williamscott2704 2 жыл бұрын
please talk about hull shapes for cats and tris to max out speed vs. stability.
@henningklaveness7082
@henningklaveness7082 6 жыл бұрын
Very informative video, I definitely learned something. Thanks :-) It would have done well with a mention of the Ady Gil, though, she was one of my favorite designs and really went to show what can be achieved with a trimaran. A shame she met such an ignoble end :-/
@MrSunrise-
@MrSunrise- 4 жыл бұрын
She was going to end one way or another soon. That round-the-world run cracked her, and she was on her way to being unseaworthy.
@CapnZman
@CapnZman 5 жыл бұрын
I currently own an F-27 sailing tri AND a 62-foot power trimaran which is also called a stabilized monohull owning to the limited volume and length of the floats. This boat can reach 10 knots with only a 60 HP Mercury Bigfoot outboard for power.
@TC-yx1qt
@TC-yx1qt 3 жыл бұрын
What year is your F27 and how big is the rear cabin for sleeping?
@MrAbah105
@MrAbah105 4 жыл бұрын
Sir, what do you think if ship design like fred olsen trimaran replaced RoRo ship. I try to compare it for indonesian
@WillN2Go1
@WillN2Go1 3 жыл бұрын
Very cool Nick. I stumbled on the Neel 4x in a sailing magazine, got curious.... well, okay.... Wait. What!? it can sail at the speed of the wind? Where do I sign up??? I just saw a video of a couple of guys crossing the Atlantic in 17 days, no record, but no bumping along either. I turned a couple kayaks into trimarans. I was after speed so I made two kayaks long and narrow - all I got was instability (which I expected but no speed?? seemed unfair) so I made outriggers and amas. By the second one (a skin on frame Iqyax) I had the amas dialed in. Single 1.25" diameter aluminum poles, bulky vertical floats...because as you well know not much touches the water. (and just the pole and little bit of weight 4' out added a lot of stability and balance). The vertical bulkiness was enough buoyancy to act as a paddle float in case I was in the water and needed to get back in. A surf ski coach happened by while I was hosing down after a paddle. He just couldn't contain himself, repeatedly telling me 'how stupid they looked.' I thanked him and kept hosing and wiping down. He totally didn't understand what he was looking at. I explained that almost nothing touched the water, and he went off again.... One thing I noticed with my amas is that even if I leaned over and put a lot of weight to the side the kayaks still tracked straight. (The yaks were 18' and 18'6" long, 17" and 16" beam less in the water). I think I figured out how the Aleuts were able to plane if anyone is interested.
@johnpotts7846
@johnpotts7846 6 жыл бұрын
I have owned 3 trimarans of cruising size. I have also owned 2 mono-hulls. A Cross trimaran is an excellent sea boat. I am currently looking for another one.
@urushira
@urushira 5 жыл бұрын
Cross is the masterpiece of multi-hulls.. I am envious (I owned a Piver )
@FlameHawke
@FlameHawke 5 жыл бұрын
As an operator of this hull configuration, what are some of your observations, and elements that may be overlooked?
@stevenhs8821
@stevenhs8821 4 жыл бұрын
Yes, trimarans are quite popular sailboats. Fast.
@sleeperburuk5340
@sleeperburuk5340 4 жыл бұрын
Can u donate one for me? I really want to test myself to go out of my current civilization and to live this one life to the fullest..
@iwilltubeyouall
@iwilltubeyouall 4 жыл бұрын
@@sleeperburuk5340 me too :)
@canoequest2
@canoequest2 6 жыл бұрын
Take a look at Corsair sailboats. They are foldable, trailerable trimarans that can cross oceans.
@markimark82
@markimark82 4 жыл бұрын
but they are tiny in regards of space and expensive... shame. i hope someone will do it better
@gregripp
@gregripp 3 жыл бұрын
I have really enjoy my Ian Farrier Eagle 20 trimaran. Very stable, lots of room for day sailing and it's mast location in the cockpit is so easy to use. Very small draft with the boards up. Folds to an 8 ft beam with the stability of almost 15 ft! No heavy keel but still points well with the centerboard. Bonus! Trampolines! Sure would love to own an F22.
@Cryptoversity
@Cryptoversity 3 жыл бұрын
@@markimark82 Look at Dragonfly.
@petersilva037
@petersilva037 3 жыл бұрын
@@markimark82 rapido 50 is a bigger corsair... rapido 60 drops the folding amas... so you lose the easy trailerability, but you get a lot of space. rapidotrimarans.com/
@timevans8223
@timevans8223 3 жыл бұрын
You can cross an ocean in a bath tub but I still wouldnt choose one. There are far more suitable boats than tris
@michaelrivera1165
@michaelrivera1165 3 жыл бұрын
Nice what is the best haul design on a large vessel for speed?
@josebenitez3732
@josebenitez3732 5 жыл бұрын
Great explanation. The only thing not covered were stresses over the cross decks in heavy weather. Been seeing the amas torn from the main hull. Would like to know how trimarans would handle loads in +50 ft. seas.
@DatawaveMarineSolutions
@DatawaveMarineSolutions 5 жыл бұрын
Badly. But they can survive, if we put a lot of engineering effort into it. One of the downsides behind trimarans is the extra engineering required for the connection between the amas and the center hull. In monohulls, the shape of the hull simplifies things a lot. The hull can only bend vertically and horizontally. But with a trimaran, the structural engineer needs to consider several extra methods of loading: pinching, pulling, twisting, torquing. Plus, the math gets worse when we consider how the hulls fatigue over their lifetime. All I can say, don't skimp on the budget when it comes to the structural engineering for that connection. That will be an expensive piece of engineering. But you really can't afford to ever get it wrong. As you said, you usually find out about the bad design in 50 ft waves, which is the worst time possible.
@urushira
@urushira 5 жыл бұрын
@@DatawaveMarineSolutions the bottom line still breaks down to carrying enough sail to run before the storm ( spinnaker too!) and having a really really miraculous relationship with your deity..
@charonstyxferryman
@charonstyxferryman 4 жыл бұрын
@@DatawaveMarineSolutions In the North Sea, waves can be 25 meters (82 ft).
@TC-yx1qt
@TC-yx1qt 3 жыл бұрын
You've seen amas broken off of tris?
@josebenitez3732
@josebenitez3732 3 жыл бұрын
@@TC-yx1qt Yep
@geoffvannerson5252
@geoffvannerson5252 5 жыл бұрын
I think a Trimaran would be great as a farly small to large Cabin cruiser
@user-nx1qf7hs5o
@user-nx1qf7hs5o 9 ай бұрын
What if you put the outer hulls deeper and a larger percent width of center .Narrow entire vessel.
@RandoCalrisiann
@RandoCalrisiann 4 жыл бұрын
I am an amateur, but am planning a trimaran hybrid, sailing, electric/solar and a back up diesel for my retirement home/world sailing boat.
@bill4nier
@bill4nier 6 жыл бұрын
Really liked what you had to say about trimarans. Here's a crazy thought I had; would it be practical to take a used 42-47 foot Southerly swing keel and add the hulls of say a 40 foot cat (unfinished from production so it's just the hulls and bridge deck). Cut out a section of the bridge deck and glass/bond the two hulls to each side of the Southerly? This could possibly give you extra cabins and storage and there would be changes in the Southerly as well. Your thoughts?
@DatawaveMarineSolutions
@DatawaveMarineSolutions 6 жыл бұрын
Well, it definitely adds plenty of extra space. In theory, it could completely work. I think you would be better off getting the catamaran hulls without the cross deck. They make those as separate pieces at the production factory. And then add in your own beams to attach them as side amas. You would need to worry about the hull strength. The Southerly yachts are not built to handle the extra stress of two side amas. They bend the hull differently from a standard monohull. Expect LOTS of extra reinforcements for the side amas. It would be a very interesting configuration for space. LOTS of space on deck, in the main hull, and the side amas. But probably not speed out of the combination. Although, with the combination of side amas and the wide main hull, you have plenty of righting moment. That combo could handle some fairly large sails. See my other video where I discuss limits on sail power: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/l7-cfJaIsJi7eas.htmlm42s It's a very interesting idea. I like it. But it will take some heavy modification to both hulls. Depending on your capabilities and situation, it might be cheaper to start with this idea and build everything from scratch. Definitely an interesting combo.
@nonoactive8918
@nonoactive8918 4 жыл бұрын
You are very smart very good video
@xpro2009
@xpro2009 5 жыл бұрын
Trimarans are very good in the shallows or littorals. Can go much nearer to shores.
@tommyb6611
@tommyb6611 2 жыл бұрын
Here is an idea, to check the chinese type 022 stealth boat design...looks like a catamaran but also like a trimaran. I wonder what would be the largest size of such a design, for example to create a heavy cruiser or larger for a pre ww2 era
@russelpasamontehabla
@russelpasamontehabla 3 жыл бұрын
Can somebody tell me the history/origin of trimaran design? It is the most common boat design here in the Philippines.
@JDI4DAVID
@JDI4DAVID 5 жыл бұрын
I am wondering if the trimaran would make a decent low drag buoy.
@Falconnner
@Falconnner 3 жыл бұрын
Thank you for your consistent videos. The most of all vessels are small recreational, fishing or roundabout boats. Would it be possible to know your opinion: why the most of them are monohulls? If the extra cost of construction of trimarans is less than the benefit from engine power decrease and fuel economy (to say nothing about ecology), why small boat producers do not take this advantage? Thanks.
@DatawaveMarineSolutions
@DatawaveMarineSolutions 3 жыл бұрын
There are a lot of factors that make monohulls more appealing. More space below deck, easier to create new variations, more weight capacity, etc. But the biggest reason: small boats do not sell based on efficiency. Small boats are usually luxury items. Luxury items sell on emotional response. The appearance of the boat does more to sell than the efficiency or engine power. I spoke to one sales rep. who explained that boats with bigger engines are easier to sell, simply because the consumer sees a larger horsepower and assumes that means a faster boat. Not every customer is like this. But shipyards will always design to the majority preferences of the market. They are in the business of selling boats and meeting customer desires. That rarely means pursuing the "perfect" boat design.
@Falconnner
@Falconnner 3 жыл бұрын
@@DatawaveMarineSolutions Thank you for super-fast and detailed explanation! I would agree that emotional factors dominate very often. So you help me to understand it more clearly about boats. I think to build my own fishing boat for a huge freshwater lake (34 miles shore-to-shore). Sometimes the weather conditions are pretty tough there. So the hull design is the biggest challenge at this point. I choose between cat and trimaran to get а good pack of speed and safety. Your reply helps a lot.
@anthonydowns9643
@anthonydowns9643 4 жыл бұрын
how do you compare submersible to non submersible Amas
@Zofirael
@Zofirael 6 жыл бұрын
what are your thoughts on the Horstman trimaran design for blue water cruising? This is my dreamboat to cross the pacific.
@the-naked-sailor
@the-naked-sailor 4 ай бұрын
Who are you talking to?
@bradmcclure4945
@bradmcclure4945 3 жыл бұрын
how is a trimaran in big water does it yaw a lot???
@sssbob
@sssbob 5 жыл бұрын
I'd like to see a trimaran SWATH vessel loosely based on the Lockheed Martin Sea Shadow, but with a central submerged torpedo hull added.
@predator1739
@predator1739 4 жыл бұрын
agree! think about DIY one for yourself !
@StuWilloughby
@StuWilloughby 4 жыл бұрын
Intending to use a trimaran SWATH design myself in building a DIY solar powered autonomous vessel. However in this design all three hulls will be submerged, with the heavy central hull containing the batteries. Should provide maximum stability, whilst allowing the solar array to sit clear of any small waves.
@predator1739
@predator1739 4 жыл бұрын
@@StuWilloughby I also have new ideas. I envisaged a new type of trimaran, with a smaller hull in the middle to provide directionality and install a power system, larger hulls on both sides to provide buoyancy and personnel accommodation, and a higher cabin for cooking For dinner, there are embracing sofas and large tables. But I think this kind of assumption will seriously hinder the rolling performance, leading to unpredictable consequences. Expect professionals to give suggestions and improve the plan.
@budsbustbi6339
@budsbustbi6339 4 жыл бұрын
i wondering if it would work for a crab boat?? heavy heavy loads on one side as pulling in the gear!! i can see for seeing gear it would save lots time with ability to haul more gear per load less trips back!!
@Soothsayer210
@Soothsayer210 2 жыл бұрын
Thx. for the video. Could you clarify if Trimaran's are easier to Capsize than Catamarans', if so why? Also for open voyages, from a safety perspective, would you recommend a mono hull or a Trimaran?
@DatawaveMarineSolutions
@DatawaveMarineSolutions 2 жыл бұрын
Trimarans are generally harder to capsize than catamarans. Tri's can normally heel to a larger angle than catamarans before they capsize. As to the comparison of trimaran vs monohull for open ocean voyages. That one is more based on personal preference.
@bishop9598
@bishop9598 4 жыл бұрын
Very interesting. Got a suggestion for you for future "studies". What is you take on whether inverted bows will make it into the "pleasure" boat ranks? Either power or sail - or both. Or is the concept relegated to large ships?
@DatawaveMarineSolutions
@DatawaveMarineSolutions 4 жыл бұрын
We already have inverted bows in pleasure yachts. They are more common on the superyachts, that can afford customization. But I am also seeing it occasionally on the more expensive production yachts. The concept works for small yachts too, to a limited extent. I think these inverted bows get used on yachts more often as an aesthetic choice.
@616ck
@616ck Жыл бұрын
😂I think I agree with you with them doing this for aesthetics, as they never use a more efficient desogn like the curves used on Bourbon Orca anchor tug, rather they use more submarine like designs, as if a billionare asked for a "cool boat for insta", and a poor engineer had to painfuly try to make it work. Talking about poor engineers, is there any good software for simulating fiberglass parts stresses? Free to use would be ideal or a leaning licence, thank you so much.
@vsdktbkm5012
@vsdktbkm5012 5 жыл бұрын
Interesting video. As someone who has designed and studied resistance, maneuverability, sea keeping and strength of mono, cat, SWATH (T-AGOS) and tri hulls and having worked for the company which has built and continues to build large tris, I can say that the interdependence of stability, motions and resistance is most intricate in the case of tris than any other hull form. Trimarans are built for speed. Steel trimarans will not be economical. Heard several times "steel weight". There are more profound and significant challenges which have not been addressed. e.g: Jet or propeller propulsion?
@nobody46820
@nobody46820 4 жыл бұрын
Jet drive all the way, it solves many issues.
@zoomzoom3950
@zoomzoom3950 3 жыл бұрын
I have a beach cat now, and plan to get a sailing trimaran (24' - 28') in the next few years; in addition to the stability, speed and handling advantage, it's also trailerable thanks to the folding arms for the amas which will save on marina fees and lift / hull cleaning fees which can add up quickly. Cheers!
@sadbucket
@sadbucket 2 жыл бұрын
interested in the trimaran choice in the seadoo switch
@adventure_unlimited
@adventure_unlimited 4 жыл бұрын
I really want to know how a quad hull would perform in a sailing vessel, Would 4 identical hulls be easy to build provide stacks of deck space for a live aboard but still have fast hulls, How would you configure the hulls, with the central hulls longer that the armars or in a square shape. Perhaps the extra deck space would be better for a those solar panels on the next gen solar electric ships. A shallow draft would be great at Anchorage, 4 hulls sounds safer than 2. How would it perform
@Supadubya
@Supadubya 4 жыл бұрын
Interesting question. I'm not the author, but if I might provide my two cents: why four IDENTICAL hulls? It would seem that at that point you're greatly cutting into the below-deck usable space (and massively increasing the wetted surface area) for small gains in reducing form-drag... Due to the Square-Cube Law (bigger objects have relatively less surface area for their volume), you might be better off concentrating most of the hull in just two hulls, both relatively close to the center of the vessel (only separated by a short cross-deck), with two additional ams's at a much larger distance out from the center. The objective here would be to reduce the wetted area AND to keep the two central hulls submerged at all times (with only the ama's rising in/out of the water). Also, bigger ships have less wetted area for their volume in the first place (Square-Cube Law). So while a "quad-maran" might not make much sense for a small yatch, I bet it would still be massively useful for something like a warship or mid-weight cargo ship (veerry low form-drag while still keeping frictional drag reasonable due to the size of the vessel, and most volume being in the two center hulls...) The other really big advantage I could see of a "quad-maran" with most mass/volume kept in the center hulls is lots of deck-space with short (and therefore, easier to make strong) cross-decks. So, you end up with area that you could use for above-deck living-space, or some sails for a bot of extra fuel-efficient power (sails and engines AREN'T mutually exclusive. Many early mechanically-powered boats in fact had both, as early steam engines were unreliable and often broke down... By having both, ships could sail if their engines broke down, or steam if the wind was stagnant... Plus, early steam engines were so incredibly inefficient it was difficult from a mass/volume perspective carry enough coal to steam across an ocean on coal alone. Having both steam and sails allowed early steam ships to cross wider oceans, and to operate in areas where coaling-stations hadn't been set up yet...)
@johnpotts7846
@johnpotts7846 3 жыл бұрын
With four identical hulls you will have a barge. Art Piver worked out wing-deck clearance and hull separation clearances back in the 1960s. Those who violate those clearances produce barges. The Gemini and Island Packet are two in the catamaran category, though it may be argued the Island Packet barge is actually a trimaran so poorly designed that it should not be on the market. Bow waves must have adequate clearance (separation) to run aft. Without adequate run, the bow waves will pile up at the bow, just like a barge.
@markhatch1267
@markhatch1267 4 ай бұрын
Just stumbled across your channel. Been watching videos about sail boat living and ocean cruising. Dreaming about living on a boat and sailing all over the world. My twist is I want to make it easy and safe for a less physically fit older person. Want to look for ways to use modern ingenuity to make the whole process of sailing far less work or even totally mechanized.
@DatawaveMarineSolutions
@DatawaveMarineSolutions 4 ай бұрын
It can be done. There are luxury sailing yachts where every part of the sail is controlled by electric winches. You sail the entire boat with push buttons from the cockpit. I think there would still need to be a few basic physical requirements though. 1. Partial ability to walk. Even someone that needs support for stability but can still handle 1 or 2 stairs. We can work with that fairly easily. It's just a full-on wheelchair that gets challenging. (Not impossible, but we really need to redesign the boat around a wheelchair.) 2. Partial flexibility. You don't need strength. But maintaining a lot of the equipment requires people to contort and fit into odd shaped spaces. If the person has larger than average dimensions, we may also need to allow extra space for that. 3. Still serviceable eye-sight and hearing. You don't need perfect vision or hearing. But enough to maintain environmental awareness. You need to hear the giant wave coming so you have enough time to grab onto something. Biggest thing: strength is not a requirement. We can compensate for lack of strength with many mechanical devices.
@markhatch1267
@markhatch1267 4 ай бұрын
Thank you so much for such a prompt reply. Into the mental stew pot they go :)@@DatawaveMarineSolutions
@adrianrubi5012
@adrianrubi5012 2 жыл бұрын
Is it a monohull with outriggers?
@predator1739
@predator1739 4 жыл бұрын
what about a trimaran with [ big + small+big ] hulls ?
@lightrose100
@lightrose100 2 жыл бұрын
Philippines have been using tri hull for decades
@Lesserthannone
@Lesserthannone 5 жыл бұрын
Wheelchair friendly sailboat!
@Rocky1765
@Rocky1765 4 жыл бұрын
Have they experimented with different percentages of buoyancy of the center hull? You stated 90-95%, leaving 5-10% for the amas. What if you changed it to 80% center hull and the amas then were enlarged providing the remaining 20%? Also, you stated the tri has a wider deck, but didn't give specifics. How much wider? If it is a significant amount, you would think it would be worth mentioning the amount.
@DatawaveMarineSolutions
@DatawaveMarineSolutions 4 жыл бұрын
Yes, they have experimented with different ratios for the amas. 90-90% in the center hull typically achieves the minimum resistance, because adding buoyancy to the side amas also increases their wetted surface area. They add more friction drag when being pulled through the water. And the combination of three hulls always has more surface area than a single hull. So we try to optimize the design by making the trimaran appear like a monohull underwater for steady conditions. As to the width of the deck, that is typically something specified in the commercial design. This is something you work with the engineer to design and specify, based on a host of vessel limitations.
@davebolig1989
@davebolig1989 4 жыл бұрын
I'm designing a swath trimaran that I think is the best of all worlds. M.P.G instead of G.P.H. is worth pursuing.
@MrAluminox
@MrAluminox 6 жыл бұрын
Sailing multihulls are totally different from motor multihulls. Sailing monos and multils have their source of power (the sails) far above the deck, not aligned with the hull(s) thus creating transversal and longitudinal stability problems. Modern racing trimarans since 30 years have been flying on a ama, and are now using foils. Nowadays maxi tris (more than 30 meters) have top speeds around 45-50 knots, sail about 900 nautical miles a day in good conditions, cross the North Atlantic in less tha 4 days, and make a circumnavigation in 41 days. No motor is able to do that. Very few naval architects is the world are able to design a high performance successful sailing multi and most are French with the exception of Nigel Irens, the most French of the British NA. You need also highly skilled and experimented shipyards used to composites specially carbon, and a bunch of engineers able to make the structural calculations on so extreme and big wind machines. compared to that a Formula One chassis is a piece of cake. (i'm a retired Naval Engineer and I've worked in this peculiar field until 1996, I know a bit about the subject). Motor multis have not these constraints as the power is aligned with the hull, the center de gravity is lower, and the construction is far simpler, using aluminium or steel. The shape of the hulls are totally different of the sailing boats. Cats have been pretty successful, see the catamaran ferries by Incat and Austal for example with speeds ranging from 35 to 62 knots. The ancestor of motor tris is Ilan Voyager by Nigel Irens. Made in 1988, very simple in low tech composite (wood, fiberglass, epoxy) with a single engine diesel Yanmar of only 235 HP, long of 21.30 meters. This boat is able of 28 knots with its modest power, is very seaworthy, and hold a record around Britain of about 2600 NM if I remember well, at 21.5 knots without refueling. The commodities are very modest as the main hull is extremely slim. the boat has a long career of small ferry in Cabo Verde Islands There are very few military motor tris. the British Triton (sold in Australia) and the French CNM Ocean Eagle 43 a very economical small 143 feet patrol ship, using 1 metric ton of fuel for 238 NM at 15 knots. A video in sea state 5 kzfaq.info/get/bejne/oZqboM1-2dWaiKs.html But the ferries company Fred Olsen had ordered in 2004 Benchijigua Express, a 127 m stabilised monohull (trimaran) vessel that Austal built for Fred Olsen. It was the biggest ship made entirely in aluminium at the date. Olsen has ordered this years 2018 2 more trimarans to Austal.
@scottd8108
@scottd8108 5 жыл бұрын
It was also a prototype for the American stealth ships🍻
@eltonsulima3117
@eltonsulima3117 5 жыл бұрын
.n.
@shaider1982
@shaider1982 6 жыл бұрын
Hi nick. Are boats with outriggers considered trimarans? Here in South east asia, almost all small fishing vessels have bamboo outriggers mated to a very slim wooden hull.
@ghostfather1390
@ghostfather1390 6 жыл бұрын
as I understand it, historically speaking, those very boats are what inspired modern multi-hull design so, yes, and no canoes with outriggers often do not have decking across the area between the hull and the ama(s), which is the distinction, as I, an admitted amateur, see it if it does have decking then I would suggest that it would depend on how many hulls/amas, 1 and 1, or 1 and 2, Cat/Trimaran
@shaider1982
@shaider1982 6 жыл бұрын
Ghostfather thanks for the info.👍
@terrykeever9422
@terrykeever9422 10 ай бұрын
Overall a good video. One problem you didn't cover that I've seen on test sails of the Neen and Leen yachts is they tend to hobby horse even in fairly calm seas. Maybe there was something they did wrong or could do different. This occurrs with sailing yachts as well as motor yachts. I'd be seasick most likely in a short time after leaving dock or anchorage. Also the smaller vessels had less comfortable usable space it seemed to me as amma cabins were very narrow and heads had to be under steps or in cubby holes.
@DatawaveMarineSolutions
@DatawaveMarineSolutions 10 ай бұрын
True. And yacht trimarans are really a completely different vessel due to their restrictions. The hobby horse motions come from the proportions of the yachts length / beam ratio. This is why large commercial trimarans will keep a minimum length / beam of 3.0 - 4.0 or greater. But yachts are trying to fit more space into a smaller size, which necessitates a lower L/B ratio of around 1.5 - 2.0. There are ways around this problem, but it takes advanced naval architecture and careful design.
@amunderdog
@amunderdog 3 жыл бұрын
Dive/launch platforms so they may be great for exploration/salvage
@drankenkorps
@drankenkorps 2 жыл бұрын
I have a interesting question.. Conversion from sailboat to trimaran.. Im asking because sailboat is built in aluminium and not finished.. So it would make sense from financial stand point but.. I dont know if would be possible?
@DatawaveMarineSolutions
@DatawaveMarineSolutions 2 жыл бұрын
That hull may be a good candidate for a trimaran conversion. The aluminum can handle concentrated loads better than fiberglass. The conversion will definitely require some reinforcement where the side amas attach to the main hull. So it is good that the hull is unfinished. Although this type of conversion probably won't achieve all the benefits of a traditional trimaran. You still have the larger center hull. I would expect no major improvement in speed, but a large hull that doesn't heel much and has a shallow draft. For a cruising boat, that could be an excellent conversion.
@ph11p3540
@ph11p3540 3 жыл бұрын
Do you think we will see more navy trimerans after the Independence/Coronado class trimeran frigates? The US Navy loved their handling but they had some serious structural and mechanical defects. Clearly, a lack of design/manufacturing experience.
@michaelbarden6987
@michaelbarden6987 6 жыл бұрын
Hi Nicholas, I got another strange stupid question for you. How difficult would it be to make a sailing trimaran that could also double as a wing in ground effect vehicle? Assume the sail could be retractable.
@DatawaveMarineSolutions
@DatawaveMarineSolutions 6 жыл бұрын
Less difficult than you think. A wing in ground effect (WIG) vehicle is basically a trimaran when it sits at rest. Then you need to add on the mast for the sail. I think the mast and sail would need to be retractable when traveling at high speeds. Otherwise, the air drag on the mast would cause the WIG to pitch up. So on the whole, slightly more difficult than designing a WIG. Of course, WIGs are fairly hard to design already. It leads to the next question: why would you want that combination?
@michaelbarden6987
@michaelbarden6987 6 жыл бұрын
Nicholas Naval Architect, I want to build or have a boat built for me. I would love to sail the water for the relaxation and fun of it but sometimes you want to get somewhere really fast, WIGS are extremely fuel efficient and fast, and having a sail would give me a slower option that doesn't need fuel. Fyi you are awesome for making this channel and I appreciate your responses to my absurdity.
@CheekyMonkey888
@CheekyMonkey888 6 жыл бұрын
kzfaq.info/get/bejne/eZOjitKc1s-6eKs.html
@michaelbarden6987
@michaelbarden6987 6 жыл бұрын
Exactly, but with a sail and the right mods for sailing, and heck put on a hydrofoil for takeoff and landing assistance.
@Platyfurmany
@Platyfurmany 6 жыл бұрын
I want one!!!
@Mikinct
@Mikinct 3 жыл бұрын
Is this video talking about residential boats or larger industrial military ships? A Tri-maran ferry & a Tri-maran a regular sailboat hobbiest would buy are very different animals all together.
@DatawaveMarineSolutions
@DatawaveMarineSolutions 3 жыл бұрын
It is targeted towards industrial ships.
@KartiacKID
@KartiacKID 4 жыл бұрын
Also, would in terms of cost of docking fees factor in trimarans as a disadvantage compared to monohulls in the length rages of 20-50ft which the avg person middle class person can afford? Would a Trimarans owner be forced to pay for 2 docking births just like most catamarans in the 20-50ft range? I’m curious on doing a cost analysis between a trimaran to a monohull with the trimaran’s lower cost to operate compared to the lower costs in yearly docking and storage fees (I live in Cleveland Ohio so I would have to winterize and store the boat at a dock yard during winter)
@TC-yx1qt
@TC-yx1qt 3 жыл бұрын
Get a folding trimaran.. it also fits on a trailer so just take it home. Corsair or Dragonfly
@bestvip5803
@bestvip5803 5 жыл бұрын
Denison yachts review had me convinced trimaran are inferior to Catamarans, now I'm watching this and it seems Trimaran should be Superior to a Cat in almost all cases except for cost??? So which is it would love you two to hash it out in a vlog
@svdoinitright7519
@svdoinitright7519 6 жыл бұрын
Have you seen the Neel 51 Trimaran? I've only seen it in promotional videos, but it looks like the amas are enormous, compared to traditional small ones.
@DatawaveMarineSolutions
@DatawaveMarineSolutions 6 жыл бұрын
Yes, that is an interesting model. I think that those long amas may be there for better seakeeping response, and to provide more internal volume. That's a great example how you can start with a classic design and arrive at something completely different, which is just as good. It all depends on what the design goals are.
@dieseldog00
@dieseldog00 5 жыл бұрын
I've read lots of bad reviews of Neel's boats, mainly for substandard, poor quality workmanship. Read the comments on the Neel 51.
@nobody46820
@nobody46820 5 жыл бұрын
@@dieseldog00 Same here.
@brianjamesvayro2715
@brianjamesvayro2715 5 жыл бұрын
So is 'Shonings (sorry wrong spelling) ,tri. very roomy and good ideas
@LarsBohr5
@LarsBohr5 4 жыл бұрын
Check out the Hammerhead 54.
@tomriley5790
@tomriley5790 3 жыл бұрын
Drat thought this was going to be about sailing trimarans - like the Rapido.
@adamschroeder3568
@adamschroeder3568 6 жыл бұрын
Are there any ships that go beyond 3 hulls? Any benefits to a design like that?
@DatawaveMarineSolutions
@DatawaveMarineSolutions 6 жыл бұрын
I once saw a study by BMT Nigel Gee on a ship with 5 hulls: ngal.co.uk/downloads/techpapers/paper9.pdf But that never went anywhere. So far, no one discovered any benefits to going beyond 3 hulls. With each hull, we get more surface area in the water, which means more skin friction. It turns into a losing game very quickly.
@DanielWilliams-oi4ss
@DanielWilliams-oi4ss 6 жыл бұрын
I think you could potentially do a quadmaran sailboat that heeled to lift to hulls out while reaching, but had both amas out while going down wind. As far as I know, this hasn't been done professionally though
@MrAmerican
@MrAmerican 6 жыл бұрын
I have seen ships that have lots of tiny hulls that adjust to give you a smother ride
@otm646
@otm646 6 жыл бұрын
Daniel Williams it'd have dihedral.
@akacreq
@akacreq 6 жыл бұрын
dragonfly and they are fast!
@ijustlovequality5337
@ijustlovequality5337 3 жыл бұрын
I’m thinking about trying a 4-5m aluminium tri with twin 70hp outboards. A super sharp entry and plumb bow. How worried should I be about broaching? There are no great video explanations of broaching in power boats.
@DatawaveMarineSolutions
@DatawaveMarineSolutions 2 жыл бұрын
I would be fairly worried about broaching. But I don't have any direct calculations to give you a specific risk.
@ijustlovequality5337
@ijustlovequality5337 2 жыл бұрын
@@DatawaveMarineSolutions of course, there are far too many variables to even begin with specifics. As for general rules, are we looking for features to oppose roll and yaw such as sharp submerged chines, deeper v in centre hull and outer edges.. or is there something else at play? I’m also interested to see the effect of Mounting outboards with a tilt outward at the bottom so the assist in creating a comfortable roll when cornering.
Splitting Waves and Hairs:  Comparing X-bow, Axe Bow, and More
18:33
DMS | Marine Consultant
Рет қаралды 444 М.
SECRET of Why Catamarans Are Great!
8:05
DMS | Marine Consultant
Рет қаралды 115 М.
EVOLUTION OF ICE CREAM 😱 #shorts
00:11
Savage Vlogs
Рет қаралды 8 МЛН
ЧУТЬ НЕ УТОНУЛ #shorts
00:27
Паша Осадчий
Рет қаралды 10 МЛН
How Many Balloons Does It Take To Fly?
00:18
MrBeast
Рет қаралды 195 МЛН
Multihull Pros & Cons from owning an F27 trimaran
15:10
Tomás Ryan
Рет қаралды 86 М.
TRIMARAN LIFE:  What We REALLY Think
30:41
Gone with the Wynns
Рет қаралды 291 М.
The TRUTH of Hull Speed:  How to Break the Sailing Speed Limit
9:16
DMS | Marine Consultant
Рет қаралды 76 М.
Smooth Sailing:  Pros and Cons of a SWATH Vessel
8:36
DMS | Marine Consultant
Рет қаралды 93 М.
GO FAST BOAT:  Pros and Cons of a Planing Hull
9:19
DMS | Marine Consultant
Рет қаралды 26 М.
Our Sailboat After Refit - The Fastest Cruising Trimaran! Part 2
20:26
Sailing: The Problem With SAILBOATS
8:27
Wayne The Boat Guy
Рет қаралды 398 М.
CATAMARAN DESIGN: Hull Shape | Essential Catamaran Knowledge Ep. 1
21:36
Sailing Ruby Rose
Рет қаралды 132 М.
Todos os modelos de smartphone
0:20
Spider Slack
Рет қаралды 64 МЛН
Запрещенный Гаджет для Авто с aliexpress 2
0:50
Тимур Сидельников
Рет қаралды 906 М.
НОВЫЕ ФЕЙК iPHONE 🤯 #iphone
0:37
ALSER kz
Рет қаралды 337 М.
Новые iPhone 16 и 16 Pro Max
0:42
Romancev768
Рет қаралды 2,2 МЛН