Palau has representatives sent to Malolos congress before USA took over the Philippines. It's all documented.

@@suskagusip1036no, false information Filipinos keep spreading, Palau had a representative yes but he wasn’t voted or chosen by the Palauan people he wasn’t even Palaun. Palauan was never apart of The Phillipines ever, The Phillipines recognized it but they were never close to the Mainland Phillipines

@@santospaul8103 Bruh you don't have to have a vote to be recognized as the same ethnic group. I grew up in Panay island/Iloilo City. We were already progressive before it became united. We don't care what Manila north does. They do their own thing, we do our own. At the end of the day "We all look alike." You should join ASEAN countries.

@@suskagusip1036 we have connection and cultural ties that can’t be denied, but Palauans back then never even considered themselves as apart of PH.

Sulu/PH needs to resolve 3 legal aspects before making any claim on Sabah from Malaysia. Firstly, Sulu needs to show undisputable proof that earlier, the Brunei Sultanate (original owner) gave North Borneo (Sabah) to Sulu as a gift for assisting in Brunei’s civil war. This is to rebuke the existence of the 29/12/1877 agreement (consisting of 4 agreements) signed by the Brunei Sultanate that grants the whole of North Borneo to the British North Borneo Company (BNBC). These agreements exist and are kept at the National Archives in London. The word “grant” has been used, and it has never been challenged or protested by Brunei, even when the British turned North Borneo into a British Charter (1881), Protectorate (1888), Colony (1946), and finally British Parliament under the Malaysia Act 1963 incorporate it into Malaysia. Secondly, let's assume North Borneo belongs to Sulu. The Sultanate of Sulu signed many agreements to relinquish his territories and dependencies (including North Borneo) to the colonizers. These include the Bases of Peace and Capitulation Agreement with Spain on 22/7/1878 and the Carpenter Agreement on 22/3/1915 with the US. Later Spain and the US relinquished North Borneo under the Madrid Protocol 1885 and Anglo-US Border Convention 1930 to the British respectively. In the end, Sulu has nothing. Thirdly, PH claims North Borneo (Sabah) is null and void. For any colonized colony that seeks independence, the territory (sovereignty) is based on what has been given by their colonizer. In this regard, the principle of uti posseditis juris is applicable, acceptable, and recognized internationally. PH got their independence from the US in 1946 and under this principle, there is NO North Borneo. Rebut with facts and references. Not hearsay. The UN has recognized Sabah in Malaysia since 1963.

Malaysia will pay rent Sabah to the Sultanate of sulu

Look like map in The moon

miangas/ las palmas island part of spanis colony

All these islands are all interconnected in the past. Colonialism broke the unity of these islands in the Pacific.

Ha ha ha ha. Most Indonesians DO NOT read their own legislation but want to claim Sipadan and Ligitan. There is NONE in their legislation that Sipadan and Ligitan belong to them. Read "Undang Undang Prp No 4 Tahun 1960 tentang perairan Indonesia". Not yours right from the beginning. What a shame. Now who is greedy? Regarding Sabah, PH lost at ICJ in 2001 and Sulu lost all their arbitration court cases in Europe in 2023. The UN has recognized Sabah in Malaysia since 1963. Shame on you.

Sulu/PH needs to resolve 3 legal aspects before making any claim on Sabah from Malaysia. Firstly, Sulu needs to show undisputable proof that earlier, the Brunei Sultanate (original owner) gave North Borneo (Sabah) to Sulu as a gift for assisting in Brunei’s civil war. This is to rebuke the existence of the 29/12/1877 agreement (consisting of 4 agreements) signed by the Brunei Sultanate that grants the whole of North Borneo to the British North Borneo Company (BNBC). These agreements exist and are kept at the National Archives in London. The word “grant” has been used, and it has never been challenged or protested by Brunei, even when the British turned North Borneo into a British Charter (1881), Protectorate (1888), Colony (1946), and finally British Parliament under the Malaysia Act 1963 incorporate it into Malaysia. Secondly, let's assume North Borneo belongs to Sulu. The Sultanate of Sulu signed many agreements to relinquish his territories and dependencies (including North Borneo) to the colonizers. These include the Bases of Peace and Capitulation Agreement with Spain on 22/7/1878 and the Carpenter Agreement on 22/3/1915 with the US. Later Spain and the US relinquished North Borneo under the Madrid Protocol 1885 and Anglo-US Border Convention 1930 to the British respectively. In the end, Sulu has nothing. Thirdly, PH claims North Borneo (Sabah) is null and void. For any colonized colony that seeks independence, the territory (sovereignty) is based on what has been given by their colonizer. In this regard, the principle of uti posseditis juris is applicable, acceptable, and recognized internationally. PH got their independence from the US in 1946 and under this principle, there is NO North Borneo. Rebut with facts and references. Not hearsay. The UN has recognized Sabah in Malaysia since 1963.

@@hopelope1703 yeah Malaysia called it a special states in news sinced it is Federation of Malaysia. Only the Sultan of Brunei and Sulu are relate to one another. The Kiram family show in documentary in GMA news.

​@@hopelope1703 Malaysia will pay rent Sabah to the Sultanate of sulu

​@@hopelope1703 Malaysia will pay rent Sabah to the Sultanate of sulu

How do you explain the existence of two agreements related to the ownership of North Borneo (Sabah) namely between Brunei Sultanate & BNBC (29/12/1877) and Sulu & BNBC (22/17/1878)? The only existing agreement involving the Sultanate of Brunei (original owner) is that agreement that Brunei granted and ceded North Borneo to BNBC on 29/12/1877. If the Brunei Sultanate had given North Borneo to Sulu much earlier, his majesty would not have signed that 1877 agreement. The signing confirms North Borneo belongs to Brunei and not Sulu. Why is there no protest from Sulu to Brunei for signing the 1877 agreement? Why was the Sulu & BNBC agreement not signed earlier in 1877 but 3 weeks later (1878) after the signing of the 1877 agreement. The original agreement in Tausug is missing during His Majesty's trip to Singapore, Thus, the validity of Sulu ownership of North Borneo is doubtful. How on earth did Sulu own North Borneo if no undisputable proof that the Brunei Sultanate gave it to them earlier? Unless there is a possibility the British had been scammed, deceived, or intimidated by Sulu into signing that 1878 agreement? The first agreement (1877) with the original owner is more valid in court.

Fake news, Maharlika isn’t real

Please cite references. Hindi ko alam kung sadyang bobo ka lang o kulang ka lang sa pinagaralan. Cite your sources, wag youtube video o tiktok, bigyan mo ako ng historical records ng sinasabi mong "makarlika".

maharlika amp obo

Where did you learn that shit? There's no maharlika kingdom or empire thing you must have learned that from TikTok and convince yourself it was real

Tama ka na akla

Saan mo naman nakuha yan? Nang-gagago ka ba?

Jappanese empire ata yan eh grabe kanaman

😂😂😂​@@kuyachamp7618 nang-gagago nga

Source: Tiktok

@DeathBySnuuuSnuuu no you arw wrong , not only Antarctica the whole world is philippine territory and owned by philippines and now gradually the universe is gradually conquered and to be owned by philippines also.

Malaysia will pay rent Sabah to the Sultanate of sulu

​@@jmgamer7332Malaysia stop paying rent since 2001 now they claim they own The land😂😂😂 how funny 🤣🤣

@@richardranido377 Yes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Malaydesh, pay $15billion to Sultanate of Sulu

​@@richardranido377they stop paying rent after the attack of sulu on sabah

​@@meloveplanebcyesmay be they wanted another attack from mnlf,milf,bnaf, abusayaff,maute ISIS 😂😂😂

Malaysia will pay rent Sabah to the Sultanate of sulu

Because britain already occupied the territory.

Because Spain had relinquished its claim on North Borneo to the British earlier under the Madrid Protocol 1885. Check it out.

Malaysia will pay rent Sabah to the Sultanate of sulu

Sure will do. Thanks

Sulu/PH needs to resolve 3 legal aspects before making any claim on Sabah from Malaysia. Firstly, Sulu needs to show undisputable proof that earlier, the Brunei Sultanate (original owner) gave North Borneo (Sabah) to Sulu as a gift for assisting in Brunei’s civil war. This is to rebuke the existence of the 29/12/1877 agreement (consisting of 4 agreements) signed by the Brunei Sultanate that grants the whole of North Borneo to the British North Borneo Company (BNBC). These agreements exist and are kept at the National Archives in London. The word “grant” has been used, and it has never been challenged or protested by Brunei, even when the British turned North Borneo into a British Charter (1881), Protectorate (1888), Colony (1946), and finally British Parliament under the Malaysia Act 1963 incorporate it into Malaysia. Secondly, let's assume North Borneo belongs to Sulu. The Sultanate of Sulu signed many agreements to relinquish his territories and dependencies (including North Borneo) to the colonizers. These include the Bases of Peace and Capitulation Agreement with Spain on 22/7/1878 and the Carpenter Agreement on 22/3/1915 with the US. Later Spain and the US relinquished North Borneo under the Madrid Protocol of 1885 and Anglo-US Border Convention 1930 to the British respectively. In the end, Sulu has nothing. Thirdly, PH claims North Borneo (Sabah) is null and void. For any colonized colony that seeks independence, the territory (sovereignty) is based on what has been given by their colonizer. In this regard, the principle of uti posseditis juris is applicable, acceptable, and recognized internationally. PH got their independence from the US in 1946 and under this principle, there is NO North Borneo. Rebut with facts and references. Not hearsay. The UN has recognized Sabah in Malaysia since 1963.

Malaysia will pay rent Sabah to the Sultanate of sulu

Malaysia will pay rent Sabah to the Sultanate of sulu

Malaysia will pay rent Sabah to the Sultanate of sulu

Malaysia will pay rent Sabah to the Sultanate of sulu

Sulu/PH needs to resolve 3 legal aspects before making any claim on Sabah from Malaysia. Firstly, Sulu needs to show undisputable proof that earlier, the Brunei Sultanate (original owner) gave North Borneo (Sabah) to Sulu as a gift for assisting in Brunei’s civil war. This is to rebuke the existence of the 29/12/1877 agreement (consisting of 4 agreements) signed by the Brunei Sultanate that grants the whole of North Borneo to the British North Borneo Company (BNBC). These agreements exist and are kept at the National Archives in London. The word “grant” has been used, and it has never been challenged or protested by Brunei, even when the British turned North Borneo into a British Charter (1881), Protectorate (1888), Colony (1946), and finally British Parliament under the Malaysia Act 1963 incorporate it into Malaysia. Secondly, let's assume North Borneo belongs to Sulu. The Sultanate of Sulu signed many agreements to relinquish his territories and dependencies (including North Borneo) to the colonizers. These include the Bases of Peace and Capitulation Agreement with Spain on 22/7/1878 and the Carpenter Agreement on 22/3/1915 with the US. Later Spain and the US relinquished North Borneo under the Madrid Protocol of 1885 and Anglo-US Border Convention 1930 to the British respectively. In the end, Sulu has nothing. Thirdly, PH claims North Borneo (Sabah) is null and void. For any colonized colony that seeks independence, the territory (sovereignty) is based on what has been given by their colonizer. In this regard, the principle of uti posseditis juris is applicable, acceptable, and recognized internationally. PH got their independence from the US in 1946 and under this principle, there is NO North Borneo. Rebut with facts and references. Not hearsay. The UN has recognized Sabah in Malaysia since 1963.

Malaysia will pay rent Sabah to the Sultanate of sulu

Sulu/PH needs to resolve 3 legal aspects before making any claim on Sabah from Malaysia. Firstly, Sulu needs to show undisputable proof that earlier, the Brunei Sultanate (original owner) gave North Borneo (Sabah) to Sulu as a gift for assisting in Brunei’s civil war. This is to rebuke the existence of the 29/12/1877 agreement (consisting of 4 agreements) signed by the Brunei Sultanate that grants the whole of North Borneo to the British North Borneo Company (BNBC). These agreements exist and are kept at the National Archives in London. The word “grant” has been used, and it has never been challenged or protested by Brunei, even when the British turned North Borneo into a British Charter (1881), Protectorate (1888), Colony (1946), and finally British Parliament under the Malaysia Act 1963 incorporate it into Malaysia. Secondly, let's assume North Borneo belongs to Sulu. The Sultanate of Sulu signed many agreements to relinquish his territories and dependencies (including North Borneo) to the colonizers. These include the Bases of Peace and Capitulation Agreement with Spain on 22/7/1878 and the Carpenter Agreement on 22/3/1915 with the US. Later Spain and the US relinquished North Borneo under the Madrid Protocol of 1885 and Anglo-US Border Convention 1930 to the British respectively. In the end, Sulu has nothing. Thirdly, PH claims North Borneo (Sabah) is null and void. For any colonized colony that seeks independence, the territory (sovereignty) is based on what has been given by their colonizer. In this regard, the principle of uti posseditis juris is applicable, acceptable, and recognized internationally. PH got their independence from the US in 1946 and under this principle, there is NO North Borneo. Rebut with facts and references. Not hearsay. The UN has recognized Sabah in Malaysia since 1963.

Malaysia will pay rent Sabah to the Sultanate of sulu

@@jmgamer7332 they stopped paying rent. It's no more Philippines territory.

@@LeeSkJohn-sv8wi Read the history of Sabah on Wikimedia, don't spread wrong information about the history of Sabah North Borneo, your history is just copying the Sultanate of Sulu of Brunei

​@@jmgamer7332 sabah history says you were pirates

@@kevar394 ready to claim malaydesh 😂😂😂😂 Power Of Dreams only Pay your debt 15Billions USD to Sultanate of Sulu now you are just a squatter in Sabah

Malaysia will pay rent Sabah to the Sultanate of sulu

Malaysia will pay rent Sabah to the Sultanate of sulu

Maharlika empire did not exist. Just a propaganda 😂

So you support irredentism?

You are no different than China that also used historical claims

@@Code-pd5hy it’s not even historical. “Maharlika” empire was not a thing.

Malaysia will pay rent Sabah to the Sultanate of sulu

Malaysia will pay rent Sabah to the Sultanate of sulu

Malaysia will pay rent Sabah to the Sultanate of sulu

good for u coming from an indonesian 😊😊

Malaysia will pay rent Sabah to the Sultanate of sulu

@@jmgamer7332 That thing doesn't even exist anymore lmfao 💀 That's like saying the US should pay rent Puerto Rico to the Spanish Empire 😭🙏

​@@rexilenzyou arent in the 1963 agreement

​@@rexilenzit still does..

Malaysia will pay rent Sabah to the Sultanate of sulu

The Spice Islands or MALUKU WILL ALWAYS BE INDONESIAN 🦅🇮🇩🦅🇮🇩🦅🇮🇩🦅🇮🇩🦅

@azkabg10 Yeah, but Miangas/Talaud will always belong to the Philippines 🇵🇭 because there are many people there that Speak Tagalog and it was originally ours!

Read the history of Sabah on Wikimedia, don't spread wrong information about the history of Sabah North Borneo, your history is just copying the Sultanate of Sulu of Brunei

@@jmgamer7332 Ha ha ha ha ha. Do you know what Wikimedia is and where they got the information from? My goodness!!!!. No wonder you seem to be lost and out of date. If you use Wikipedia as a reference in your thesis and not from any reputable journal, it will be thrown out of the window. Not even in court. Think.

Sulu/PH needs to resolve 3 legal aspects before making any claim on Sabah from Malaysia. Firstly, Sulu needs to show undisputable proof that earlier, the Brunei Sultanate (original owner) gave North Borneo (Sabah) to Sulu as a gift for assisting in Brunei’s civil war. This is to rebuke the existence of the 29/12/1877 agreement (consisting of 4 agreements) signed by the Brunei Sultanate that grants the whole of North Borneo to the British North Borneo Company (BNBC). These agreements exist and are kept at the National Archives in London. The word “grant” has been used, and it has never been challenged or protested by Brunei, even when the British turned North Borneo into a British Charter (1881), Protectorate (1888), Colony (1946), and finally British Parliament under the Malaysia Act 1963 incorporate it into Malaysia. Secondly, let's assume North Borneo belongs to Sulu. The Sultanate of Sulu signed many agreements to relinquish his territories and dependencies (including North Borneo) to the colonizers. These include the Bases of Peace and Capitulation Agreement with Spain on 22/7/1878 and the Carpenter Agreement on 22/3/1915 with the US. Later Spain and the US relinquished North Borneo under the Madrid Protocol 1885 and Anglo-US Border Convention 1930 to the British respectively. In the end, Sulu has nothing. Thirdly, PH claims North Borneo (Sabah) is null and void. For any colonized colony that seeks independence, the territory (sovereignty) is based on what has been given by their colonizer. In this regard, the principle of uti posseditis juris is applicable, acceptable, and recognized internationally. PH got their independence from the US in 1946 and under this principle, there is NO North Borneo. Rebut with facts and references. Not hearsay. The UN has recognized Sabah in Malaysia since 1963.

Malaysia will pay rent Sabah to the Sultanate of sulu

Lmao if that's the case we're not different from China who uses historical claims then?

Malaysia will pay rent Sabah to the Sultanate of sulu

Ha ha ha ha. Just keep on dreaming.

@@hopelope1703 Malaysia will pay rent Sabah to the Sultanate of sulu

Malaysia will pay rent Sabah to the Sultanate of sulu

Ha ha ha ha. What undisputable evidence you have that North Borneo belongs to Sulu/PH? You can keep on dreaming.

Sulu leased sabah and gave them to UK which mean that UK doesn't "illegally" occupy sabah

Sulu/PH needs to resolve 3 legal aspects before making any claim on Sabah from Malaysia. Firstly, Sulu needs to show undisputable proof that earlier, the Brunei Sultanate (original owner) gave North Borneo (Sabah) to Sulu as a gift for assisting in Brunei’s civil war. This is to rebuke the existence of the 29/12/1877 agreement (consisting of 4 agreements) signed by the Brunei Sultanate that grants the whole of North Borneo to the British North Borneo Company (BNBC). These agreements exist and are kept at the National Archives in London. The word “grant” has been used, and it has never been challenged or protested by Brunei, even when the British turned North Borneo into a British Charter (1881), Protectorate (1888), Colony (1946), and finally British Parliament under the Malaysia Act 1963 incorporate it into Malaysia. Secondly, let's assume North Borneo belongs to Sulu. The Sultanate of Sulu signed many agreements to relinquish his territories and dependencies (including North Borneo) to the colonizers. These include the Bases of Peace and Capitulation Agreement with Spain on 22/7/1878 and the Carpenter Agreement on 22/3/1915 with the US. Later Spain and the US relinquished North Borneo under the Madrid Protocol of 1885 and Anglo-US Border Convention 1930 to the British respectively. In the end, Sulu has nothing. Thirdly, PH claims North Borneo (Sabah) is null and void. For any colonized colony that seeks independence, the territory (sovereignty) is based on what has been given by their colonizer. In this regard, the principle of uti posseditis juris is applicable, acceptable, and recognized internationally. PH got their independence from the US in 1946 and under this principle, there is NO North Borneo. Rebut with facts and references. Not hearsay. The UN has recognized Sabah in Malaysia since 1963.

There is a court case recorded in 2001 by ICJ (International Court of Justice, The Hague) about the Philippines' claims on North Borneo. It is a special 37-page report by ICJ that was published in 2001 and is easily accessible from the ICJ official website. It was a trial within a trial in the main court case between Malaysia and Indonesia over the ownership of the islands of Sipadan and Ligitan in Sabah. Philippines which is not a party to the trial requested permission to intervene. To comply with Article 62 of the Statute of the Court, the Philippines stated the objectives for the intervention (Section 7 & 84) namely, to safeguard and preserve the Philippines' historical and legal rights (only found in 1973 PH Constitution) over North Borneo and to inform the court of the effect or effect of the court outcomes of the trial on its claim to the territories. In that trial, Philippines lawyers explained their case especially the Sulu-Ovenbeck 1878 agreement (primal reference) and related information to the court (Section 44 & 83). The same 15 main court judges were sitting at the bench and Malaysian and Indonesian lawyers too were present. On 23 October 2001, by a 14 to 1 vote, the court rejected the Philippine's request on the ground that there is “no interest of legal nature” (Section 93). (Meaning Sulu/PH claim on Sabah is null and void) Type the statement below and go to the official ICJ website (a 37-page report): INTIZRNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE REPORTS OF JUDGMENTS, ADVISORY OPINIONS AND ORDERS CASE CONCERNING SOVEREIGNTY OVER PULAU LIGITAN AND PULAU SIPADAN APPLICATION BY THE PHILIPPINES FOR PERMISSION TO INTERVENE JUDGMENT OF 23 OCTOBER 2001

Malaysia will pay rent Sabah to the Sultanate of sulu

Sulu/PH needs to resolve 3 legal aspects before making any claim on Sabah from Malaysia. Firstly, Sulu needs to show undisputable proof that earlier, the Brunei Sultanate (original owner) gave North Borneo (Sabah) to Sulu as a gift for assisting in Brunei’s civil war. This is to rebuke the existence of the 29/12/1877 agreement (consisting of 4 agreements) signed by the Brunei Sultanate that grants the whole of North Borneo to the British North Borneo Company (BNBC). These agreements exist and are kept at the National Archives in London. The word “grant” has been used, and it has never been challenged or protested by Brunei, even when the British turned North Borneo into a British Charter (1881), Protectorate (1888), Colony (1946), and finally British Parliament under the Malaysia Act 1963 incorporate it into Malaysia. Secondly, let's assume North Borneo belongs to Sulu. The Sultanate of Sulu signed many agreements to relinquish his territories and dependencies (including North Borneo) to the colonizers. These include the Bases of Peace and Capitulation Agreement with Spain on 22/7/1878 and the Carpenter Agreement on 22/3/1915 with the US. Later Spain and the US relinquished North Borneo under the Madrid Protocol of 1885 and Anglo-US Border Convention 1930 to the British respectively. In the end, Sulu has nothing. Thirdly, PH claims North Borneo (Sabah) is null and void. For any colonized colony that seeks independence, the territory (sovereignty) is based on what has been given by their colonizer. In this regard, the principle of uti posseditis juris is applicable, acceptable, and recognized internationally. PH got their independence from the US in 1946 and under this principle, there is NO North Borneo. Rebut with facts and references. Not hearsay. The UN has recognized Sabah in Malaysia since 1963.

Much of what we know about Srivijaya though are stolen records about San-fo-qi, ie, "Kamboja", the ancient Angkorian Empire of Cambodia. Historian Liam Kelley already has papers about that. Srivijaya, as an Indonesian empire, is a hoax! Beside the mention of the polities "Saludong" and "Solot" (commonly equated with Selurong/Maynila and Sulu) in the Javanese text Nagarakertagama, we have no other records that the premodern Philippine kingdoms were tributaries to Majapahit. NADA. Wouldn't it be better if to be proud of the kingdoms that existed in our territories than that of nearby countries?! Butuan Kingdom was known as a kingdom of gold and spices. Sulu was known for its South Sea pearls. Mait for its cotton and edible birds nest. Stop the inferiority complex!

🙄

Tell me you're from Republic of POohXi 😂😂😂Malaysia is a puppet of PoohXi

​@@SaneTan1027at least not puppet you colonized

Sulu/PH needs to resolve 3 legal aspects before making any claim on Sabah from Malaysia. Firstly, Sulu needs to show undisputable proof that earlier, the Brunei Sultanate (original owner) gave North Borneo (Sabah) to Sulu as a gift for assisting in Brunei’s civil war. This is to rebuke the existence of the 29/12/1877 agreement (consisting of 4 agreements) signed by the Brunei Sultanate that grants the whole of North Borneo to the British North Borneo Company (BNBC). These agreements exist and are kept at the National Archives in London. The word “grant” has been used, and it has never been challenged or protested by Brunei, even when the British turned North Borneo into a British Charter (1881), Protectorate (1888), Colony (1946), and finally British Parliament under the Malaysia Act 1963 incorporate it into Malaysia. Secondly, let's assume North Borneo belongs to Sulu. The Sultanate of Sulu signed many agreements to relinquish his territories and dependencies (including North Borneo) to the colonizers. These include the Bases of Peace and Capitulation Agreement with Spain on 22/7/1878 and the Carpenter Agreement on 22/3/1915 with the US. Later Spain and the US relinquished North Borneo under the Madrid Protocol 1885 and Anglo-US Border Convention 1930 to the British respectively. In the end, Sulu has nothing. Thirdly, PH claims North Borneo (Sabah) is null and void. For any colonized colony that seeks independence, the territory (sovereignty) is based on what has been given by their colonizer. In this regard, the principle of uti posseditis juris is applicable, acceptable, and recognized internationally. PH got their independence from the US in 1946 and under this principle, there is NO North Borneo. Rebut with facts and references. Not hearsay. The UN has recognized Sabah in Malaysia since 1963.

Hindi Mo Alam Iyung pinagsasabi

There's already an undisputed proof. It is only Malaysia who don't want to recognize it. Sabah and Palau belongs to the Philippines since it was already mapped out by Spain included in the old Philippine map before the Americans occupied Palau and British occupied Sabah without permission from the owner like the old colonialists did. They just claim ownership for what they see without respect to the natves.

@@zakkarawylde151 There is a court case recorded by ICJ (International Court of Justice, The Hague) about the Philippines' claims on North Borneo. It is a special 37-page report by ICJ that was published in 2001 and is easily accessible from the ICJ official website. It was a trial within a trial in the main court case between Malaysia and Indonesia over the ownership of the islands of Sipadan and Ligitan in Sabah. Philippines which is not a party to the trial requested permission to intervene. To comply with Article 62 of the Statute of the Court, the Philippines stated the objectives for the intervention (Section 7 & 84) namely, to safeguard and preserve the Philippines' historical and legal rights over North Borneo and to inform the court of the effect or effect of the court outcomes on its claim to the territories. In the trial within a trial, Philippines lawyers explained their case especially the Sulu-Ovenbeck 1878 agreement (primal reference) and related information to the court (Section 44 & 83). The same 15 main court judges were sitting at the bench and Malaysian and Indonesian lawyers too were involved in this trial. On 23 October 2001, by a 14 to 1 vote, the court rejected the Philippine's request on the ground that there is “no interest of legal nature” (Section 93). (Meaning Sulu/PH claim on Sabah is null and void) Type the statement below and go to the official ICJ website (a 37-page report): INTIZRNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE REPORTS OF JUDGMENTS, ADVISORY OPINIONS AND ORDERS CASE CONCERNING SOVEREIGNTY OVER PULAU LIGITAN AND PULAU SIPADAN APPLICATION BY THE PHILIPPINES FOR PERMISSION TO INTERVENE JUDGMENT OF 23 OCTOBER 2001 The UN recognized Sabah in Malaysia since 1963. You are still dreaming. Rebut with facts and references. NOT HEARSAY.

@@zakkarawylde151 Spain put Sabah on the map because it is based on Sulu's false claim. That is why Spain easily acknowledged Sabah belonged to the British under the Madrid Protocol of 1885. Earlier on 29/12/1877 Brunei Sultanate (original owner of Sabah) granted the whole of Sabah to BNBC. Way before Sulu relinquished her territories to Spain under the Bases of Peace and Capitulation Agreement dated 22/7/1878. What evidence do you have that Brunei gave Sabah to Sulu much earlier?