The benetton was a great car then. Still think Senna would have schooled him. Sad it never happened.

@@jacobgreen3415 no way if he didn't schooled him in his previous years how would he in a car that was worse off? I still think Schumacher era was there and Senna time was up.

It was only a great car because Benetton illegally was using the traction control which wasnt in the FIA regulations after Williams won both 92 and 93 Drivers World Championship( Mansell and Prost ) using traction control...ironically enough once Senna joined Williams in 94. They werent allowed to using the same technology for the traction control... Why because they didn't Want Senna to Win anymore World Championships because since the French have the biggest influence in politics with the FIA ..they didnt want to see a BRAZILIAN win 5 , 6 , 7 DRIVERS World Championships ...No not a South American since it's a European based Sport..if u really think Senna wasnt Murdered..think again because The French and the British had to huge part in this scandal. Senna was the Greatest and Will always will be...unfortunately the FIA didnt want a South American as the greatest

@@jacobgreen3415 Senna was evenly matched by Prost on race days. I don't think a more complete driver like Michael had problem to beat Senna on equal footing.

@@jacobgreen3415 It would have been very tight, no schooling there. Senna's edge maybe would come from experience but I guess we would never know.

Funny thing that. Lewis for example poodles around in an electric car or rarely drives at all.

@@Bahamuttiamat Lewis also crashed a Zonda not so long ago) and drove a superbike just past december.

@@VNtergon you would often see Lewis and Sebastian riding a vintage bike to a Grand Prix.

Well they actually have supercar or even hypercar at their garage. But just like everyone it's not their daily. Jenson Button have a P1 and many more but he daily drive a Civic (Type R which is still a Sporty car anyway)

@@rockzs74r Lewis has an impressive collection of cars, but he said himself they're investments not meant to be driven a lot.

Schumacher did aswell. Same mindset as Ayrton and Schumacher admired him and yet people fight over it when Senna was Micheals Hero aswell. Vettel aswell has mechanical background and helps developing the car and gives feedback better than anyone currently in f1

@@SCYN0 Vettel is not in the same league. He can't do shit without a good car. Senna won with every car he was in.

Senna

Senna remains the best driver in the wet I’ve ever seen. There will never be another driver like him.

@@alexcla9445 No he didn't.

*Just take zee Money, why not, stucco is the word.*

Emil Two Finns decide to meet for a drink One says to the other ‘Hallo’ Half an hour passes. The other replies ‘Hallo. Half an hour passes. First one says - Here to drink or chit chat?

he says even less today :-)

I think he have problem with English language (me to lol). I seen videos in his language, and he was very talkative.

@@bartekb8222 I imagine these videos are what are called 'interviews'. People tend to talk in these. People form their impressions when Kimi is asked to 'comment'.

I would say Button was too

Absolutely, couldn't agree more. It's a real shame that someone like Brundle is such a high profile commentator on F1 when Coulthard is a much more likeable and able guy and has actually won some Grand Prix, unlike Brundle!!!

DC should be the 3rd guy on the broadcast. Brundle is perfect as is.

Been enjoying DC as commentator for years on the bbc/c4 coverage. The fact its his production company (along with Jake Humphrey iirc) just shows he has intelligence to go with his easy-going charisma too.

And Jenson Button

Sepehr PM oh I miss those days.

Never met Jimmy Hill then have you guys. Lol

Does that mean he’s not coming on then?

You'd think it would cause aerodynamics problems but old Dave was a decent driver in his time.

Helps to lower the centre of gravity, Mark Webber had the same advantage.

THE FERA,you cite weak rivals, higher numbers of races, numbers of races is not the main question for the pilot to have the highest numbers of poles or victories, we must also analyze each season the car, the difference of the best team to other adversaries if it is too big if rivals are too fast or not, whether the one tire has more grip or not at every track disputed, Schumacher only had the best F1 car in 2001,2002 and 2004 but Ferrari did not have much difference in relationship with the Mclarens and the Williaws as had Senna's and Prost's Mclarens in 1988 and 1989 in relation to the other teams, Vettel and Webber RBRs and current Mercedes, you may notice that only those who had the best car fired in relation the other teams in the last 30 years managed to beat 13, 14 poles in a single season in 1988, in 1989 and 1990 Senna had the best car with the best tires and hit 36 ​​poles having as a single opponent the Prost that as quoted above it was the a driver who rode more often in high-end cars in the history of F1 and only had a good performance of poles just in the year that ran for the powerful Williams of 1993 from another planet where he hit 13 poles more than half of what he did from 1980 to 1991 where he he hit 20 mists, he was a very intelligent, strategic driver who thought a lot and great technique but he was never a bad rider in the rain, Prost only hit 4 poles in 1988 and 1989, and no pole for Ferrari in 1990, I ask you a question Prost was able to dispute poles with the German? If even with inferior drivers he could get good numbers of poles before 1988 he could never hit a good number of poles nor when he was champion in 1985 and 1986 he got good numbers of poles, Mansell for the love of God calls that fool of adversary as the Sennistas call it a joke, it took him five and a half years to win a race, he took the teammates' handicap in more than 80% of the seasons, he was behind Elio Deangilis in 4 seasons for Lotus and 1985 even in Williams being car top lotus took Elio's cock again he also took Keke Rosberg's stick from his 1985 mate in 1984 to remember while Elio was third in the world he with the same the car finished tenth in 1987 even though Piquet being a great driver more was debilitated with the accident of the training of Imola in the famous curve Tamburello and he lost the title anyway, took stick of Prost in Ferrari, these 2 Mansell and Prost were the only one between 1988 and 1991, since Piquet from 1988 to 1991 did not have a car to disturb Senna, Schumacher stayed between 1991 and 2000 facing superior machines of his had to take the disadvantage of the equipment in the track had no way to hit 13 poles with equipment lower in 1993 even with Mclaren having their best car ever and who says that are the Mclaren bosses themselves on their team sites, MP4 / 8 is the McLaren model of the 1993 F1 season. He was guided by Michael Andretti, Mika Häkkinen and Ayrton Senna. It was the most advanced McLaren of all time because it had traction control, start control, fly by wire accelerator, active suspension, ABS brakes and various electronic devices. Even so with superior equipment in the personal fight with the German each one dropped 8 times in front of the other and Senna did not manage this stupid advantage that had in the training with Prost in the times of the Mclaren where the two were pilots and neither minima advantage he also got over the German, the only Ferrari managed in the sixth season to give the best car for Schumacher that was why Senna did not go to Ferrari because he said that the team would take at least four seasons to give a car competitive for him, do you think Senna would beat between 1996 and 2000 13 poles in a single season? Schumy's first rival in 1992 and 93 and 94 was the senna he was weak?

The fera,you mention Rubinho, because Rubinho himself in an interview in March 2015 in the program of Jô Soares said that Ferrari only asked him to give the position to the German twice, one in 2001 he was in second and the German in third and they reversed the position and added 2 points to Schumacher in the world only that the German finished the world-wide with 123 points and the second one had 65 the David Coulthard or the 2 points was very little in front of the great difference on the vice of the year , the other time was on the famous day today not today yes where he gave up the first place and reversed the positions in the Austrian GP but as Schumacher also yielded a victory for him Rubinho and returned the 4 points that he was given and that world Schumacher was champion in July and won the championship shot if there was not the team game he would be penta anyway, but because of that team game the FIA ​​from 2003 banned the team game and even so he won or more 2 times out of the 2000 he won without a team match and still the 2 of BENNETON.Now what I think is funny is that you forget and I will remind you and ask you to re-watch the GP of South Africa of 1993 where Galvão in full transmission of the race cited a Senna agreement with his ex: rival in his time of Lotus Michele Alboreto that in 1993 was not his teammate but turned his great friend where he cites that the Alboreto asked the Senna how long he Alboreto wants him to delay Prost during the race when he has Alboreto ahead as a latecomer and Senna accepted the help and asked for 3 to 4 seconds or more, well the Schumacher was the first victim of this agreement of companions of different team in the next GP in the GP of Brazil of 93, the German had been in the beginning of the GP of Brazil surpassed by Alesi and after the Prost Senna and HILL fired fights by position then the German got rid of Alesi and it flew low and arrived easy at fight of the two there Hill gets rid of Senna and the Brazilian begins to take a real pressure from the Schumy and in the middle of the way the Alboreto sucks the Senna facilitates the passage of him so he does not get overtaken and began to play dirty so the German does not pass and for Senna to open, what an ugly thing Senna did in, the Rubinho was at least the same team as the German and Alboreto, I'll also remind you that Senna also played team with Berg on the day of the tri in Japan in 1991 as the madman of Mansell facilitated Senna's life and left the idiotic pilot lane Senna had to in the end return the position that Berg had ceded despite the pulling bag of Galvão wanted to put in the head of the Brazilian people Senna that wanted to give the victory pro Berg a washed-up lie was order of the team and Senna was annoyed to receive the order wanted to be champion winning.

@@wilsonchagasneto4078 If all that you wrote uselessly is true, it does not matter, for it does not exclude the facts I mentioned in my fair and polite commentary: the world knows that Senna is incomparable, and that he can name five or six better than his German (the most punished in F1 history). Accept and do not live resentful for this ...

Thanks

Xilo Channel you’re the real MVP 👍

He thought he was better than Schumacher in some fucked up delusion, of course he’d say senna

@@aidbfrjdbdhrvchxbdjd6362 schumi fanboy detected

It's just one former driver's opinion. By no means definitive. I mean, on a good day Nigel Mansell could beat Ayrton Senna. Senna was by no means the demigod so many here paint him to be.

Well, it WAS an accurate observation, AND Keke is still a (former) champion, so . . .

@@draganluzija3823 - Championships are determined by points, not by wins. If Moss hadn't only won four (not five) and retired from five races he wouldn't have lost by a single point. You're criticizing my comment because DC's example was his contemporary and not some season way before he was born? Keke IS a former world champion. No one thinks of him as being in the same class as champions who've been dominant. There are world champions and there are *World Champions*. That is an accurate observation. Just because you bring up a far older, and perhaps more relevant, example, that most never knew, or forgot if they did, does not detract from DC's observation. It's ok if you don't think it's accurate. Seems there's _something_ unusual about most every season.

Keke won one race in 1982, when nobody else won more than twice that year. Plus, he was the pace-setter at a few grand prix that season, lost in Austria by 0.1 sec, etc etc. AND he was the racer's racer. DC can say what he wants, but he's well below Keke Rosberg in any 'F1 greats' list.

Keke was better than coulthard

yeah, he still looks like a minecraft character.

Lol

He can whoop somebody's ass using only his chin as a weapon😂😂

His jaw has moulded to the shape of his helmet.

Made from Scottish granite... ;-)

Big respect for David. My F1 "story" starts from West Mclaren Mercedes. And Mika Hakkinen... David was very helpfull for Mika. Mika's double championship is result of teamwork (not only of course).

No not class. He have an agenda. To glorify himself. He was a middle quality driver in the best cars for almost a decade. Achieved little. The dominating driver during his career was MS. Saying that Mika H was on same level in speed (or better) is silly. It is like saying John Terry is same level as Messi or Maradona. Coulthard is just making a fool of himself.

@@thomashansson7347 absolutely agree! I can't work out the fascination on Coulthard - he was simply not on the same level as the top drivers, not just because he didn't win a championship but because he wasn't as quick, even in a matched car like the dominant Mclaren in 1998/1999. Plus the bullshit incident at Spa 1998 was pure strategy...taking the racing line straight out of a bend when you know someone's going to lap you.....sorry but he knew what he was doing when he took Schumacher out. 1998 should have been Michael's year and his 8th world title.

​@@charlieburrows7490 I'd say he was really good, but not as good as Mika or Michael. These two were generational talents. I'd put him on the Frentzen level. Quick, but prone to mistakes.

@@thomashansson7347 No, it's you making a fool of yourself. He was asked his opinion and gave it. At least he won a GP or two, which is a lot more than you will ever do.

An exception to who? The only drivers I know who have had reputations for being difficult were James Hunt, Nigel Mansell, Carlos Reutemann, and more recently Fernando Alonso.

proud enough to have a photo of it in his motorhome

And the MASTER Sir Jackie.

Respect 👍

That episode of Top Gear was hilarious. Never thought I'd see an F1 car used as a paintball gun.

Well he's really just stating the truth.

He's right though lol. Across the 80s, Rosberg won 5 races, Mansell won 15, and yet one didn't win any championship that decade

He's the wrong one to ask. He was never in the top league. English isn't my first language, so I'll be brief. Senna and Schumacher were similar in that they were quick on certain tracks and in certain weather conditions. Coulthard makes the same mistake that many people make in that statistics are now king. In Rosberg Era the criteria for winning championship was different. In short modern Era driver summary. Mansell - didn't care about car. Senna - didn't care about himself. Schumacher - didn't care about other drivers. Ask hill and villeneuve, to name two. Hakkinen was not the same after he broke his neck and didn't have the career he should have had. Schumacher had to wait for people to die or retire to be champion. And his agent was Flavio

@@DocTommy1972 Häkkinen was still incredible though, 26 poles, 20 wins and 2 titles, and could've achieved more!

@@elliotcrossan6290 I would place Häkkinen above both Hamilton & Schumacher.. And being very close to Senna.

Quickest driver of all time. Senna. Best driver of all time. Schumacher. Depending on what kind of parameters you use, you can either go Senna or Schumacher as the greatest. One thing I still value a lot is Schumacher´s choice to make a bad team great again. Senna wanted the best car. He never wanted to make a team better or build a legacy. His legacy is 90% his death.

bowlchamps37 agree in parts. The first part of the statement are facts because that’s how history unfolded and no one can debate with that. Senna didn’t live as much só everything else is assuming. Senna was faster driver and understood a lot more about cars. Even barrichello used to help Schumacher finding balance and tuning his car. Do your research on that. So to me if you know more and are faster that speaks volumes. Anyways they both are great legends from different times. That’s my opinion and I respect yours too. Aho !

Michael was more consistent and calculated, Senna was faster and more instinctive. Both freakish in the wet

Matthew Aravena Schumacher also said he thought Senna is was the GOAT

If you watched both you would know they were about even in not so good cars and in the rain

You gotta do what you gotta do!

last book I read -> my own. Sounds like Garth Merenghi - "I've written more books than I have read"

Dennis Bloodnok Channel ☝️

Yeah not really fair to call Rosberg undeserving. He could beat any driver on the grid when he was on. Reliability was a huge factor back in those days. On average you would be lucky to finish 2/3rds of the races for the year, which they had less of compared to now. So with the field being so equal then having certain races where other teams were better and then your car being good when it had a failure. Very easy to take few good results. I've watched full seasons of the 80s and he was a real force in F1. But for poor reliability he could have been a multiple world champ. He beat all his team-mates (other than Prost in his final year when he wasnt really even trying anymore and was getting fat lol) His absolute pace was always equal to anyone else

You are forgetting Senna and the McLaren that won 15 of 16 races

@@ramonsilvia6576 - Whilst you have a point here, the one thing about 1988 was that Ayrton Senna had Alain Prost as his teammate. Prost won the other seven races that year and really gave Senna a "run for his money" in the championship. This made things much more exciting.

Schumacher was a phenomenal driver and ahead of his rivals in abilities and skill , hamilton ? I don't think so . If he ever left mercedes and joined another team he'd be just another driver

I thought I was the only one thinking that. Oddly he looks a lot like him now his more mature years.

sonicstep I know he owns “kit” now I can see it in his eyes.

You mean Knight Rider?

TheKestevon Yep, the car is called “kit”.

Couldn't imagine if DC suddenly sing "True survivor" 😂😂

Really ? Didn't know cheating is called revolutionising these days

@@manigopal92 Very good one! I got that smile on my face just enough to be consider as a laugh ! Senna is way better driver than MS, with a slower car, Senna won, with a slower car, MS never won ! MS fanboy this BlackMountain17 !

@@djorksolo8544 yup. No comparison between Senna the God and Ms

@BOB1 CLO We all know Schumacher didnt win all his F1 titles in a slower car. Before they could change the engine after every race almost. Senna for example won a GP with a broken gearbox, only 1 or 2 gears left. He was so much tired after this incredible performance, he couldnt lift the trophy. Sorry, but Senna is way above Schumacher, even other pro racing drivers as David Coulthard told it. So theres nothing wrong in my comment !

@@djorksolo8544 You lost all credibility when you said Schumacher never won in a slower car. Well 1996,1997,1998,1999 seasons would like to disagree with you, so would 1994,1995, 2000 championships. If you had any actual intelligence, you would realize that Senna was king of on the limit qualifying and Schumacher was king of consistency on raceday.

Made me laugh.

Lol Senna was great, but highly overrated.

You pretty much butchered his name. lol

I was going to laugh, but then I realised it was true. Today, you win the internet. Thank you.

Yes you are right

🐝

160hp lol, must be epic

For sale?

🇧🇷☝️

He was also utterly ruthless when he wanted to be, like when he ran Prost off the track at the 1990 Japanese GP, taking them both out of the race, but ensuring he won the title (the reverse happening the previous year).

@@phantomechelon3628 revenge

Prost's better

@@Mr7Cavalier7 It's debatable, both are in the top 5 of all time. Senna was way faster, Prost was better at setting the car.

I even had a small David Coulthard car toy

There's quite a few of us who don't think fondly of that German twat

@@moptopbaku6022 Nobody cares about those few.

Boss Those few are a lot more than the soft melts who like the kraut.

@@moptopbaku6022 and why , because he kicked the shit out of the guy you liked? What did schumi ever do so horrific that you " dont think fondly of that german?" Sounds like you are associating him with hitler? " THAT GERMAN" .. So are all german people like hitler or think like hitler? FRACK NO THEY DIDNT.. ignorance is bliss.

@@moptopbaku6022 Sounds like you hate German people in general not just Schumacher the legendary Formula 1 Champion. I guess I'll continue to admire exceptional people while you will continue to hate entire groups based on who knows what preconceptions.

i see her at the Geneva motor show , god damn she is pretty.

tycinis she looks like a result of a successful eugenics program or some shiit.. I cant tell in the vid, but u said u saw her, is she wearing a ring?

can't say , i was just looking at her eyes ;-) @@primeanomalous4275

double loads for her

Yes, thanks. You can be virgins elsewhere now.

Senna wasn’t so fast at williams which was when they mainly competed

You would think so but apparently not. On Sky's Legends of F1 series Eddie Irvine had some very revealing insights regarding Schumacher. Schumacher would make huge mistakes regarding car set up and Irvine made the point that it was only when Rubens joined Ferrari that they really took off. He also said that was the reason why Schumacher didn't make much of an impact at Mercedes when he returned in 2010. Very interesting episode and well worth a watch.

@@ReclusiveDuck That didn't tell anything about his work at Benetton. Pat Symond had very good things to say about his technical understanding of f1 car. Also Michael was the main test driver for 2014 regulations according to Ross Brawn. Brawn also added that Michael was very good at working around problems.

@@TheKestevon Irvine says much the same, but it was interesting to hear about his flaws as well as his strengths.

No one like him

If you ask any racingdriver, everyone would say Senna was the best, because it is the truth!

@@smartsouler i know that why i said Senna simply the best 😎

@@sb19567 dream on

@Crixus Mauperthuis we all cry for him aswell because we lost the best there will ever be . Thank you for your reply though and thinking of his family etc very thoughtful of you

The thoughest teammate *Senna* went up against was *Prost.* The thoughest teammate *Shumacher* faced was.. Barrichello? lol Bottom line is that Schumacher doesn't win 7 titles if he had to race against the likes Senna, Kimi or Alonso in the *same car.* Alonso would be a 4x champion if *Hamilton* didn't show up in 2007. Hamilton would be on his way to his *8th* title if he didn't have to go up against *Alonso* in 2007 and *Rosberg* in 2016.

The championship Lewis lost to Rosberg we can't really say the he was outperformed because he lost the championship despite having more wins and poles. Reability cost him in the end, but the point I'm making still stands because *Rosberg* gave him a run for his money. None of Shumacher's teamates were even allowed to challenge him.

@@Euclides287 True but it is also hard to compare teammate as there is always some internal stories. There is proof that Honda was playing with the car for the show and giving Senna a better car than Prost. Ron Dennis even said it during the French conference of 1989. Prost car was consistently slower but using more fuel during all the previous GP (mostly won by Senna). Senna also had more engineers to work on his cars because of his special relationship with Honda etc. Those are little things that can make big differences. Rosberg also seemed to suggest that Hamilton got some advantages. So you can have the best driver ever as a teammate if the team or even the engine supplier want the other guy to win, they will find a way ...

@@Euclides287 well irvine and barrichello were both highly rated before they raced against michael. After rubens left ferrari and went to honda he was also able to be as fast as button who later raced hamilton and was nearly as fast as him and challenged him. So rubens was a very good driver.

@@derluke668 Rubens was nowhere near as fast as Button, stop it. It wasn't even close between them when JB won the championshipn in 2009. Irvine was just another journey man who couldn't even win with the 1999 car that was clearly better than Mclaren.

Which one was it?

@@nagow_360 the one at 4:23

@@kiranganesh8598 that's a good one

Like Senna would have been.

Why

Why do people keep mentioning his chin. His chin is normal, it's his jaw bone that makes him look like a cartoon character.

Not a good example Mozart was better.

@@patbassman8251 By what criteria?

@@bobbestofbobs Beethoven was brilliant no one can deny that but Mozart was born a master musician, every thing about his playing was perfect he was a genius , what he achieved by the time he was 12 years old would take other musicians a life time , some people are born players the rest have to work very hard.

Or Pele vs Maradona.

@@patbassman8251 It's besides the point though, both musicians were clearly born with a level of ability far above the norm into the level of genius. When it gets to that point its very hard to objectively decide who was better, it becomes more opinion based. Like if you take what you just said and look at it you realize its really just a matter of opinion.