I searched this video just for that

Handler

He's 191cm

But also what’s funny, is that they think none of us are smart enough to realise that argument is known by Major Companies as their best form of marketing. Which when required, can be used to prop up their flagship products lack of performance (even when it’s caused by its funders treatment of the environment/market) it’s form alone acts as a promotion for the collectives indices, and at times of trended losses they have been known to be artificially funded I.e Merchandising, franchising, Grants, contracts and/or bail outs, usually if not always to ensure its influence of trended lifestyle is still sellable to the diminishing general public interest as debts. It’s traded positions are usually not made solely from long positions, and usually include shorting or offsetting the asset as well. The real tell is how many innocent investors are foolish enough to take losses in products so obviously marketed this way. Usually this form of trade when graphed is indicative of a soon to be failed Entity. If you’re unsure what I’m on about, you can watch Margot talk about it in the big short, or if you’re a little smarter and want to understand the mentality that acquisition COMPANY relies on check her out as Naomi in The Wolf of Wall Street. What most people fail to see is how arguments are traded for debt on markets, debts that Large acquisition firms can use to purchase everything they’ve devalued and made cheaper. Including a products like Margots, imagine if as a person her delivery was an honest one, do you think acquisition would promote that to influence their market prediction? Do you think acquisition trades (firms) would care about you as a person over asserting its control of its positions? It should be obvious now that people are the products that acquisition brings volatility to by falsely advertising a decreased value and worth as a deception to create it. Try and tell me you don’t approach things with your mindset. Jas THAT bloodline